ALI-ABA Course of Study Consolidated Tax Return Regulations Section 1504: Consolidated Group...

ALI-ABA Course of StudyConsolidated Tax Return Regulations

Section 1504: Consolidated Group Membership Issues

Steven B. TeplinskySteptoe & Johnson LLP

Washington, DC

October 4-5, 2007

Copyright © 2007, Steven B. Teplinsky All Rights Reserved

Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure: As provided for in Treasury regulations, advice (if any) relating to federal taxes that is contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any plan or arrangement addressed herein.

§1504:Required Consolidation of a

Nonmember?

CCA 200729035 (Apr. 11, 2007)

P

SeveralForeignOpCos

NationalCooperative

7Regional

Cooperatives

More than 20% voteLess than 80% vote

• Query: Did the IRS conclude that National Cooperative must be treated as a member of P’s consolidated group for all purposes?

• See §1501 (“An affiliated group of corporations shall, subject to the provisions of this chapter, have the privilege of making a consolidated return ….”); Treas. Reg. §1.1502-13(h) (“If a transaction is engaged in or structured with a principal purpose to avoid the purposes of this section (including, for example, by avoiding treatment as an intercompany transaction), adjustments must be made to carry out the purposes of this section.”).

§1504(a)(3):Required Five-Year Lapse

Before Reconsolidation

• §1504(a)(3)(A): “If--

(i) a corporation is included … in a consolidated return filed by an affiliated group …, and

(ii) such corporation ceases to be a member of such [affiliated] group …,

… such corporation (and any successor of such corporation) may not be included in any consolidated return filed by the affiliated group (or by another affiliated group with the same common parent or a successor of such common parent) before the 61st month beginning after its first taxable year in which it ceased to be a member of such affiliated group.”

• Note:

– §1504(a)(3) limits the inclusion of a corporation in a consolidated return filed by a consolidated group. §1504(a)(3) does not affect the inclusion of the corporation in the affiliated group itself.

– There is no definition of “successor” for purposes of §1504(a)(3).

§1504(a)(3)(A)

§1504(a)(3)(B): Waiver of Five-Year Reconsolidation Waiting Period

• §1504(a)(3)(B): “The Secretary may waive the application of subparagraph (A) to any corporation for any period subject to such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe.”

• Rev. Proc. 2002-32, 2002-1 C.B. 959, and Rev. Proc. 2006-21, 2006-24 I.R.B. 1050 (modifying Rev. Proc. 2002-32), provide rules regarding waivers.

§1504(a)(3): Legislative History

• §1504(a)(3) was enacted in 1984.

• Conference Committee Report states that “[t]he rule is an anti-abuse rule, and the conferees expect the Treasury to so apply it.”– Conference Committee Report does not identify the targeted abuse.

– Presumably, Congress was attempting to prevent taxpayers from electively deconsolidating the group or deconsolidating certain group members for a desired period of time.

Year 4

$

X

P

T

100% T Stock

Year 1

$

X

Result

S

P

S X

T

S

T

100% T Stock

§1504(a)(3)(A): Base Case

• T is barred from joining the P group’s consolidated return until Year 7.

P

Base Case – Parent Variation

• The new P affiliated group is barred from filing a consolidated return until Year 7 (absent a waiver). See PLRs 200607012, 200517024, 200539007.

• What if P acquired a new subsidiary in Year 3 (while P was a member of X’s group)? Would P and the new subsidiary be permitted to file a consolidated return in Year 5 without a waiver?

• What if P acquired a new subsidiary in Year 5 (while P was the parent of a new P group)?

100% P Stock

X

S

T

P

Shareholders

Year 1

100% P Stock

X

S

T

P

$$

A

Year 4 Result

X

S

T

P

A

100% V Stock

$

Year 1

90% 10%

Merge

Year 3

10% P Stock

A

S

T

P

V

T

A

V

T

A

S

The Successor Case

PS PS PS

W W S W/V

P P

Result

• Although there are numerous definitions of “successor” for particular consolidated return regulations, there is no definition of “successor” for purposes of §1504(a)(3).

• Nevertheless, W presumably is V’s successor. Query whether the respective pre-merger values of W and V are relevant.

• If W is V’s successor, W is subject to §1504(a)(3).– If P has an excess loss account (an “ELA”) in W’s stock, it appears that the ELA is triggered. See

Treas. Reg. §1.1502-19(c)(1)(ii) & (c)(2).– If W was a buyer or seller in an intercompany transaction, it appears that the intercompany item

should be taken into account immediately before the merger under Treas. Reg. §1.1502-13(d) (subject to other applicable Code sections, such as §267).

• If T had merged into a P subsidiary, the surviving corporation presumably would have been a successor of T and thus would have been precluded from joining in the P group’s consolidated return under §1504(a)(3)(A).

• Because T instead merges into P, it appears that P is T’s successor and that P is precluded from joining in the P group’s consolidated return. Cf. the Base Case - Parent Variation.

• If P is precluded from joining in the P group’s consolidated return, is the P group completely deconsolidated, or is P the only affiliated group member excluded from the consolidated return?

– If S, X, and V can file a consolidated return without P, must they do so?– If S, X, and V file a consolidated return without P, how would the consolidated return regulations work?

The Successor Parent Case

P P P P/T

S S SS

T

T T

A

A A

A

V V VV

X X XX

ResultYear 3Year 1 Year 2

$

T StockMerge

40% P Stock

Old P Shareholders

40%60%

100% V Stock

$

Year 1 Result

Merge

Year 3

10% P Stock

AT

V

T

AP

VSS

P

T

The Interposed Successor Case

90% 10%

APS

P

PSPS

• Presumably, S is V’s successor, and thus is excluded from the P consolidated group under §1504(a)(3).• The treatment of T is unclear. If S is not a member of P’s consolidated group, it is unclear how to make appropriate

adjustments under the consolidated return regulations.– Should S’s basis in its T stock be adjusted under Treas. Reg. §1.1502-32? If yes, should P’s basis in its S stock be

adjusted under the tier-up rules of Treas. Reg. §1.1502-32(a)(3)(iii)?– What of adjustments to earnings and profits (“e&p”) under Treas. Reg. §1.1502-33?– Should appropriate stock basis and e&p adjustments be “suspended” until S is included in P’s consolidated return?– Should transactions between P and T be intercompany transactions under Treas. Reg. §1.1502-13 if the investment

adjustment provisions do not operate in a manner that preserves single entity treatment?– If S sells the T stock, should the loss disallowance regulations of Temp. Treas. Reg. §1.337(d)-2T apply?– If S is not included in the P consolidated group, can S and T elect to consolidate?

• See §1501 (stating that “[a]n affiliated group of corporations shall, subject to the provisions of this chapter, have the privilege of making a consolidated return…”); Treas. Reg. §1.1502-75(a) (generally requiring that all eligible members join in the consolidated return).

S/V

Parent Liquidation Case

• Can the S1 affiliated group elect to consolidate? – Or is S1 a successor to P, causing §1503(a)(3)(A) to apply?– Or should the S1 affiliated group be required to consolidate?

• Does it matter what portion of P’s assets are contributed to S1?• Does it matter when P contributes assets to S1?

– In connection with the liquidation transaction,– In a separate transaction more than two years before P liquidates, or– In a separate transaction more than five years before P liquidates.

(1) P contributes some assets

(2) P liquidates

S1

P

S2

Year 1 Result

A B

S1

S2

A B

Merger S Corp/P

S T

(1) Stock of Other Subs

(2) Merger

S SubP

T

S Sub

Other Subs

TS Sub/S

S Corp/P

Other Subs

Other Subs

• The merger of P into S Corp deconsolidates the P group and disaffiliates T and the Other Subs.• S Corp’s contribution of Other Subs to T reaffiliates T and the Other Subs, with T as the common

parent of a new affiliated group.• Can the T affiliated group elect to consolidate?

– Or is T a successor to P, in which case §1503(a)(3)(A) applies?– Does it matter what portion of P’s assets were contributed to T?– Would it matter if P contributed assets to T before the merger, of if S Corp contributed P assets to T one or two

years after the merger?• In PLR 200438015, the Service concluded that the T group had the privilege of filing a consolidated

return beginning in the first year after the transaction.– In light of taxpayer’s representations, the Service may have viewed T as P’s successor and granted a waiver

under §1504(a)(3)(B), although the ruling doesn’t refer to a waiver or the waiver provision.– The taxpayer represented that “[t]he transfers of assets from [P] to [T] will represent less than X of [P].” – Should the percentage of P’s assets or S’s assets transferred to T be relevant?

Parent Termination Case #1 (PLR 200438015)

Year 1 Year 1 Result

S

S Corp

Sub

• The conversion of Old P to an S Corp terminates the Old P group effective Date A.• The Conversion of Sub 1 to a QSub disaffiliates Subs 2-4 effective Date A.• The contribution of Subs 2-4 to New P creates a new affiliated group with New P as the parent.• Can the New P group elect to consolidate (without a waiver)?

– Or is New P a successor to Old P, causing §1503(a)(3)(A) to apply?– Does it matter what portion of Old P’s assets were contributed to New P?

• In PLR 200604017, the Service concluded that New P “will not be considered a successor” under §1504(a)(3)(A) and that the New P group may elect to file a consolidated return.

– The taxpayer represented that “[t]he stock of Sub 2, Sub 3, and Sub 4 accounted for approximately x% (less than 5%) of the total fair market value of Old Parent.”

– This 5% threshold is unrelated to the “substantially all” standard contained in Rev. Proc. 77-37, 1977-2 C.B. 568 (90% net value/70% gross value).

Parent Termination Case #2 (PLR 200604017)

Effective Date A Date B Result

Old P

Sub 2

Sub 1

Sub 3 Sub 4

Sub

New P

Old P

Sub 2

Sub 1

Sub 3 Sub 4

Subs 2, 3, & 4

Sub

New P

Old P

Sub 2

Sub 1

Sub 3 Sub 4

Converts to S Corp

Convert to QSubs

Section 355 – New Affiliated Group Case #1 (PLR 200023040)

• P and D continue to be an affiliated and consolidated group, with P as the common parent.• Newco, Controlled and the Other Subsidiaries are a new affiliated group, with Newco as the common

parent.– Can the Newco affiliated group elect to consolidate?– Or is Newco a successor to P, causing §1504(a)(3)(A) to apply?

• In PLR 200023040, the Service expressly granted a waiver of §1504(a)(3)(A), thus apparently concluding that Newco was a successor of P.

P

D F

Controlled Newco

(2) F forms Newco with

some D stock and

other assets

Controlled

P

FD

Other Subs

Other Subs

(1) P contributes

some D stock to F

D

F

(3) D distributes the Controlled stock in return

for D stock

P

Newco

Other Subs

Controlled

P

D F

Newco

Controlled

Other Subs

Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Result

Section 355 – New Affiliated Group Case #2 (PLR 200626011)

• Distributing and the Retained Subs continue to be a consolidated group.• Can Controlled and the Contributed Subs file a consolidated return?

– Or is Controlled a successor to Distributing, causing §1504(a)(3)(A) to apply?• In PLR 200626011, the Service held that Controlled will not be considered a

successor to Distributing for purposes of §1504(a)(3), and that Controlled and the Contributed Subs could elect to file a consolidated return.

– The ruling does not refer to any taxpayer representation regarding the relative values of Distributing and the Contributed Subs transferred to Controlled.

Contributed Subs

Retained Subs

Public

Contributed Subs

Retained Subs

Public

Contributed Subs

ControlledStock

Contributed Subs

Retained Subs

Public

Controlled Controlled

Controlled

DistributingDistributing

Distributing

Taxable Asset Acquisition Case

TTS

BP$

85% of T Stock(1)

85%15%

(2)T checks the box to be treated as a partnership (§332 as to B, §331 as to P)

• Can the P group continue? Or is P the successor of deconsolidated T because P has acquired 15% of T’s assets in a taxable transaction?

• What if P retained 25% of T’s stock (so that (i) P acquired 25% of T’s assets and (ii) T’s liquidation was a §331 liquidation for both P and B)?

• What if, instead, P purchased a significant portion of T’s assets prior to selling the stock of T?

ALI-ABA Course of Study Consolidated Tax Return Regulations Section 1504: Consolidated Group...

Documents

Transcript of ALI-ABA Course of Study Consolidated Tax Return Regulations Section 1504: Consolidated Group...