Alexandria City Public Schools
17
1 DRAFT SNS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT Every Student Succeeds Alexandria City Public Schools PRESENTATION
Transcript of Alexandria City Public Schools
1 DRAFT
S N S F A C I L I T I E S A N D E Q U I P M E N T A S S E S S M E N T
Every Student Succeeds
Alexandria City Public SchoolsP R E S E N T A T I O N
Project Over viewP U R P O S E
The assessment will:
• Provide a foundation to understand the current state of kitchens and cafeterias at ten schools not slated for renovation in the near future.
• Provide the understanding for recommendations ranging from operational initiatives to equipment replacement.
• Support the school nutritional program provided at these schools, including the ability for them to provide nutrient rich foods in accordance with federal regulations in a way that encourages students to participate.
• Assess problems facing the program, its adaptation, as well as provide insight into ways to enhance operations and ensure safety at each school.
• Address cafeteria capacities needed to serve the growing student populations, and the aesthetics of these environments.
2
The Team
Brailsford & Dunlavey, Inc.Operations
Birchfield & JacobsKitchen Equipment and Layout
Potomac Energy GroupMechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering
Cox Graae + SpackArchitecture
3
Primar y Findings Years of deferred maintenance create
issues with current code requirements and equipment needs.
Implementation complications aremulti-faceted.
Aesthetic solutions are the least expensive, but impactful.
Facility and equipment solutions will be
more complex and expensive, but
provide future savings and efficiencies.
Operational solutions may require staffing adjustments, ongoing training, and supervisory modifications over an extended period of time.
4
Par t ic ipat ion Gap Analys i s
5
Faci l i t ies and Equipment Assessment
6
SUMMARY OF FACILITIES & EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT
Re p re s e n t a t i ve E x a mp l e –A re a s t h a t Wa r r a n t A t t e n t i o n
M T. V E R N O N E L E M E N T A R Y S C H O O L
7
MEP Assessment
8
SUMMARY OF MEP ASSESSMENT
Architectural Assessment
Walls – Glazed CMU, muted
Floors – Vinyl tile, muted
Ceilings – 2’ x 4’ acoustic ceiling tile
Lighting – 2’ x 4’ fluorescent lights
9
Dining Aesthetics
Dining OccupancySUMMARY OF DINING OCCUPANCY
*Typical utilization at Maury does not exceed 160, but is 220 when periods overlap.
Representative Example: Matthew Maury
Put in a slide that shows current Mr. Vernon Dining Room and the picture we chose…just a WOW of the difference.
10Current Dining Conditions
Representative Example: Mt. Vernon
Put in a slide that shows current Mr. Vernon Dining Room and the picture we chose…just a WOW of the difference.
11Concept Photo
Example: Aesthetic Renovations
Put in a slide that shows current Mr. Vernon Dining Room and the picture we chose…just a WOW of the difference.
12Current Servery Conditions
Example: James Polk
Put in a slide that shows current Mr. Vernon Dining Room and the picture we chose…just a WOW of the difference.
13Concept Photo
Example: Servery Design & Layout Renovations
Recommended Act ionsF A C I L I T I E S , E Q U I P M E N T , & I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
14
Typical scheme breakout. These differ by school, and not all have three schemes.
Budget
15
RECOMMENDATION
16
QUESTIONS?COMMENTS?
17
