Albert Einstein Middle School -...
-
Upload
vuongquynh -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of Albert Einstein Middle School -...
Campus Entry
Mirandy Drive
Albert Einstein Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission StatementEXPLORE, DISCOVER, CREATE
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
AEMS-I
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Albert Einstein Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Albert Einstein Middle School
Narrative SummaryThe site is just over 20.5 acres in a fully developed neighborhood and adjacent, on the north side, to Rosemont Community Park. The school was built in 1964 with a design shared by four other schools in the district and is in generally fair condition. Designed for an enrollment of 800 it currently serves 805 students.
Access to the school from Kiefer Blvd. is convenient but there is not a convenient turn a round or loop route for buses. There are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones. Drop offs currently take place along the Mirandy Drive frontage and in the staff parking lot. Drop off in the parking lot creates conflicts with parking. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades for paving and striping to the parking lot and service drives plus some path of travel upgrades have been made but more are needed. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and separate designated drop off lanes for bus and parent use are recommended.
About 20% of the classrooms are on the second floor and served by a single elevator and two stairways.
Both stairs and elevator need barrier free upgrades. The nearly fifty year old school was built with little considerationfor energy efficiency and improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more efficient lighting and effective energy control systems. The existing windows in the primary classrooms are minimal and do not provide a good level of natural light. The school has undergone some improvements but does not yet meet most contemporary educational needs.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the Quad. This area is adequate and in reasonably good condition. The student snack bar is adjacent to the Quad. Other outdoor student areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings.
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but in fair condition. Some areas need resurfacing and striping. More efficient irrigation and water management for the fields would be a recommended improvement.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor Path of TravelPoor drainage creates hazardous walkways.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreMost planting areas in campus core are on manual valves, on the domestic water system. Irrigation system needs updating.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Undesignated parent and bus drop off occurs along street frontage or in staff parking lot. Neither have barrier free access spaces and conflicting traffic creates hazards.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior Multiple old controllers do not effectively manage irrigation. Replacement with central “smart” system would significantly improve water conservation.
Energy & AtmosphereSome low voltage cabling installed in surface raceway. Other areas cabling is surface mounted or exposed.
Materials & Resources ExteriorInadequate slopes and drainage allows the accumulation or water that damages roofing and creates leaks.
Indoor Environmental Quality Inadequate power for contemporary uses plus surface mounted raceways and exposed wiring reduce functionality and contribute to unpleasant environments.
Albert Einstein Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorReplace plumbing fittings with “low flow” automatic devices.
AEMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Indoor Environmental Quality Barrier free casework, fixtures and teaching stations along with improved storage would greatly improve classrooms.
Mirandy Drive
Albert Einstein Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan of Campus
AEMS-III
Albert Einstein Middle School
The following is a site organizational concept of Albert Einstein Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (46,268 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom HousesIncludes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (6,079 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (8,400 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
PL
OLCOLCCampus
Quad
Staff ParkingCampusCampus
EntryEntry
OLC
Drop Off
Admin.TC Visitor/Parent
OLC
Gym
MP
Campus Campus EntryEntry
OLC
Classroom
Expansion
AEMS-IV
Albert Einstein Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 9
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 9 25 118 PointsAEMS
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 660,270
$ 2,470
$ 0
$ 368,550
$ 37,310
$ 0
$ 1,068,600
$ 791,700
$ 381,290
$ 0
$ 3,320,460
$ 1,590,290
$ 0
$ 6,083,740
$ 5,367,180
$ 357,890
$ 47,580
$ 7,142,460
$ 1,156,740
$6,677,710
$ 20,749,560
$ 6,819,150
$ 741,650
$ 47,580
$ 10,831,470
$ 2,784,340
$ 6,677,710
$ 27,901,900
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
- Overall face lift- Landscaping- New classrooms- New bleachers- Technology upgrades- New school to match Rosemont HS
The vocational shop classrooms have been closed and the spaces are being used for art and science classrooms and storage. In the current condition these spaces are not suited for these uses.
The school is well designed and effectively integrates the older buildings with the newer. The buildings are in generally good condition. Upgrades are needed however, especially to the auditorium and associated classrooms, to comply with code egress and access requirements. Barrier free access upgrades are needed throughout the campus.
The school buildings, especially the older ones, were built with little consideration for energy efficiency. Improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows, lighting and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more effective energy control systems. The schools boiler is not currently in use and the system needs study for upgrading or removal.
Outdoor student gathering areas include a large plaza or quad and a small amphitheater adjacent to the music classrooms and snack bar.
The amphitheater however, is surrounded by asphalt paving and is not an inviting environment. It could be greatly improved with the addition of some drought tolerant landscaping and shade trees.
Narrative SummaryThe site is 13.5 acres at the corner of Land Park Drive and Vallejo Way in a fully developed neighborhood. Land Park Drive is a major street with public transportation. The school serves a student body of 688. The permanent buildings have three distinct components. The Auditorium and six classrooms identified as "3A" & "3C“ were built in 1938. An attached classroom wing, "3B" was added in 1975. Building 1 (core building) and the Gym were built in 1977.
Vehicle access and student drop off is along Vallejo Way just off of Land Park Drive. The main entrance to the school and administration office is along Vallejo Way and reasonably well defined. There, however, is no convenient turn-a-round or exit for traffic back to Land Park except through narrow residential streets. Additionally, there are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones and no barrier free drop off space. Drop offs currently take place along the Vallejo Way frontage and in the staff/visitor parking lot fronting Vallejo Way. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. Path of travel upgrades are needed from the parking lots. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and a designated drop off lane is recommended along Vallejo Way.
Building 1 houses Administration, Media Center, Multi-Purpose Cafeteria, Kitchen and 25 classrooms that include band, vocational and science classes.
Campus Entry
California Middle School
California Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
CMS-I
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but only in fair condition. Resurfacing is needed. Primary service and emergency vehicle access is from 17th Street on the South side of the campus and crosses the playfields.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, California Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Vallejo Way
At California Middle School, we know the importance of setting ambitious goals and maintaining our focus in support of student achievement.
Together we work to support our staff in providing students with a well-rounded program focused on high academic standards. We expect all of our students to succeed, and our commitment is to provide them with the tools they will need to meet those expectations.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityAccess for food service, maintenance and emergencyvehicles crosses both playfields and hard courts.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreThe “Quad” area is ample and well developed with minor irrigation problems. The source of the irrigation water is uncertain and should be investigated.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off There are no designated barrier free compliant drop off areas. Buses and parents use the same street frontage.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior A review of the irrigation controllers is recommended.The addition of a “smart” system could be a valuable conservation effort.
Energy & AtmosphereVery inefficient 30 plus year old HVAC units have gone well beyond their expected life cycle and should be replaced.
Materials & Resources ExteriorStaining indicates leaking areas of roofing.
Indoor Environmental Quality Casework, throughout the school, does not meet barrier free access requirements.
California Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorRestrooms and fixtures are in excellent condition. Installing “low flow” valves and fittings is recommended for better water conservation.
Materials & Resources InteriorShowers in the locker rooms are not being used and iffuture use is anticipated it will require considerable upgrades for barrier free access.
CMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
California Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan of Campus
CMS-III
The following is a site organizational concept of California Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (48,200 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (7,200 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (17,112 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
California Middle School
Vallejo Way
TC
Gym
MP
PL
PL
Drop Off
Visitor Parking
Staff Parking
PL
PL
OLC
Auditorium
CMS-IV
California Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 0 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 8
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 8 25 118 PointsCMS
list pending input from school
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 1,632,800
$ 1,820
$ 0
$ 755,690
$ 0
$ 0
$ 2,390,310
$ 763,230
$ 366,990
$69,550
$ 1,327,300
$ 1,287,390
$ 0
$ 3,814,460
$ 5,041,660
$ 403,650
$ 920,920
$ 3,066,310
$ 1,229,150
$10,741,770
$ 21,403,460
$ 7,437,690
$ 772,460
$ 990,470
$ 5,149,300
$ 2,516,540
$ 10,741,770
$ 27,608,230
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
The school has undergone some improvements but most areas still need considerable upgrades for CBC Access Compliance and to meet contemporary educational needs.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the "Quad" which is adequate for school gatherings and in reasonably good condition. Other outdoor student areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings. Water drainage is also an issue creating large areas of puddles on the walks.
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but in fair condition. Some areas received a seal coat which is problematic on hot days.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Fern Bacon Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Narrative SummaryFern Bacon Middle School ; one of the District’s Priority Schools, was originally constructed in 1960. The site is just under 14 acres in a fully developed neighborhood and adjacent, on the south side, to Bowling Green Charter Elementary School.
The school’s design is shared by four other schools in the district and is in generally fair condition. Designed for an enrollment of 800, it functioned as a K-8 until the K through 6 grade students moved to the new John Still Elementary School in 2006. John Still Middle School currently serves 611 students.
There are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones. Drop offs currently take place along the Cuny Ave. frontage and in the staff parking lot. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades for paving and striping to the parking lot and service drives. Some path of travel upgrades have been made but more are needed.
About 20% of the classrooms are on the second floor and served by a single ramp and two stairways. As with other schools of the period, the fifty year old school was built with little consideration for energy efficiency.
Campus Entry
Fern Bacon Middle School
Fern Bacon Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement.
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
FBMS-I
Cuny Avenue
Statement pending input from school
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition poses safety risk
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreAmple space but uninviting without shade. Concrete walks and surfaces are uneven and broken.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off No designated bus or parent drop off. Parent drop off in staff parking lot with congestion and conflicts. No barrier free drop off space or path of travel,
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior Upgraded irrigation and drought tolerant planting should be incorporated for water conservation.
Energy & AtmosphereOlder fixtures with inefficient T-8 fluorescent lamps should be replaced. Installing/upgrading an energy management system needs review.
Materials & Resources ExteriorStanding water on roofs due to inadequate slopes and drainage.
Indoor Environmental Quality Gym bleachers, classroom case work is not barrier free access compliant and needs replacement.
Fern Bacon Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorExisting fittings should be replaced by low flow metering valves and faucets.
Materials & Resources InteriorFlooring replacement needed.
FBMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Fern Bacon Middle School
Fern Bacon Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan of Campus
FBMS-III
The following is a site organizational concept of Fern Bacon Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (46,268 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (6,079 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (8,400 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
Cuny Avenue
Fern Bacon Middle School
PL
OLCOLCCampus Quad
Staff Parking
CampusCampusEntryEntry
Drop Off
TCVisitor/Parent
Gym
MP
Campus Campus EntryEntry
OLC
OLCAdmin.
OLC
FBMS-IV
Fern Bacon Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 4 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 10
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 10 25 118 PointsFBMS
Rank order of priorities:
1. Install lighting in parking lot (a big safety concern of parents for years)
2. Repair broken bleachers in Gym (extreme safety and liability issue)
3. Replace old and broken lockers in locker rooms
4. Upgrade bathrooms
5. Upgrade WiFi technology infrastructure (not consistent in the building)
6. Improve athletic fields (including drinking fountains and grass that is not lumpy which leads to injury)
7. Plant more trees on campus (quad and back of school)
8. Repair unsightly and unsafe broken cement (work done last year for Priority School upgrade is already broken)
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 268,840
$ 0
$ 0
$ 749,840
$ 36,920
$ 0
$ 1,055,600
$ 1,950,910
$ 0
$ 0
$ 2,813,070
$ 1,493,960
$ 0
$ 6,257,940
$ 5,579,210
$ 704,430
$ 0
$ 4,086,420
$ 1,899,820
$ 7,488,000
$ 19,758,180
$ 7,798,960
$ 704,730
$ 0
$ 7,649,330
$ 3,430,700
$ 7,488,000
$ 27,071,720
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
The vocational shops are not used and the spaces are being made available for other uses. About 20% of the classrooms are on the second floor and served by a single ramp and two stairways. Both stairs and ramp need barrier free upgrades. The nearly fifty year old school was built with little consideration for energy efficiency and improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more efficient lighting and effective energy control systems. The existing windows in the primary classrooms are minimal and do not provide a good level of natural light. The school has undergone some improvements but does not yet meet most contemporary educational needs. The overall condition of the school is generally very good.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the Quad. This area is adequate, however mostly landscaping, and in reasonably good condition. The student snack bar is adjacent to the Quad. Other outdoor student areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings.
The athletic fields and paved play courts are ample for the current enrollment but in fair condition. Some areas need
Narrative SummaryThe site is just over 22 acre in a fully developed neighborhood and adjacent, on the west side to John Still Elementary School and on the southeast side, to Meadowview Park.
The school was built in 1967 with a design shared by four other schools in the district and is in generally fair condition. Designed for an enrollment of 800 and originally served as a K-8. In 2005 the K through 6 grades moved to the new, adjacent John Still Elementary School and the middle school currently serves 313 students.
Access to the school from John Still Drive and is convenient but there is not a convenient turn a round or loop route for buses. There are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones. Drop offs currently take place along the John Still Drive frontage and in the staff parking lot. Drop off in the parking lot creates conflicts with parking and service access. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades for paving and striping to the parking lot and service drives plus some path of travel upgrades have been made but more are needed. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and separate designated drop off lanes for bus and parent use are recommended.
Campus Entry
John Still Drive
John H. Still Middle School
John H. Still Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
JSMS-I
resurfacing and striping. More efficient irrigation and water management for the fields would be a recommended improvement.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, John Still Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
John Still Middle School is dedicated to ensuring the academic success of every student. Our mission is to prepare students to succeed in high school and beyond. We’re a small middle school of only 350 students. We boast a relatively small teacher-to-student ratio and we place a strong emphasis in both Math and English-Language Arts.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition and drainage poses safety riskand maintenance issues.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreQuad has adequate shade but limited paved surfacesfor assembly and barrier free access.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parent drop off takes place in the staff parking lot creating potentially hazardous traffic conflicts. Additionally there in no barrier free drop off space.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior There is no dedicated backflow or meter for the irrigation system. Much of the landscape is irrigated using manually operated valves and is in poor condition.
Energy & AtmosphereOld fluorescent fixtures have T-8 bulbs. Update with new more efficient fixtures.
Materials & Resources ExteriorInadequate slopes and drainage causes standing water that damages roofing.
Indoor Environmental Quality Casework and floor elevation changes are not barrier free compliant.
John H. Still Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorUpgrade fixtures with low flow automatic metering fittings.
Materials & Resources InteriorSteps, landing, railing and door clearances do not comply with CBC barrier free or egress requirements.
JSMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
John H. Still Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Site Plan of Campus
JSMS-III
‘Student Centered Education’The following is a site organizational concept of John H. Still Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (46,268 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (6,079 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (8,400 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
Campus Entry
John Still Drive
John H. Still Middle School
PL
OLCOLC
Campus QuadStaff Parking
Drop Off
TC
Visitor/Parent
OLC
Gym
MPCampus Campus
EntryEntry
OLC
OLCAdmin.
-Upgrade technology-Desktop Computers, WiFi access, cameras and LCD
projectors-Smartboards-HVAC upgrades-Computer lab
JSMS-IV
John H. Still Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 9
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 9 25 118 PointsJSMS
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 189,540
$ 1,820
$ 217,490
$ 837,200
$ 0
$ 0
$ 1,246,050
$ 702,130
$ 0
$ 333,480
$ 2,813,590
$ 194,480
$ 0
$ 4,044,040
$ 4,268,160
$ 0
$ 151,840
$ 4,509,700
$ 209,170
$ 9,220,250
$ 18,359,120
$ 5,159,830
$ 1,820
$ 703,170
$ 8,160,490
$ 403,650
$ 9,220,250
$ 23,649,210
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
Additional parking area is recommended and should be located in reasonable proximity to the school's entrance and administrative office. There have been recent path of travel upgrades to the staff parking lots but more is needed to be fully code compliant.
The campus is a pleasant homogenous design with good internal circulation and the core secured by ornamental steel gates. The campus is well planned for a compact facility and suited to the neighborhood. However an updated color scheme would be more appropriate for the age group. Some modernization has been completed to upgrade restrooms for code compliance but has left unsightly patches in tile finishes. Additional upgrades for code compliance are needed throughout the campus.
The school buildings were built with little consideration for energy efficiency and improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more efficient lighting and effective energy control systems.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the Quad. This area is well located, adequate and in reasonably good condition. The student snack bar is adjacent to the Quad. Other outdoor student
Narrative SummaryThe site is just over 9 acres in a fully developed residential neighborhood just off commercially developed Folsom Blvd. The site is small but appears adequate for this school that was built in 1976, This existing Middle School campus is in generally fair condition and has been looked at as a viable candidate to be converted into an IB Program to support Grades 7-12.
The Buses currently bring about 70% of the students to school and create some traffic issues within the neighborhood. The buses must route through the neighborhood to enter and exit the school but are able to loop from Folsom Blvd. and back with reasonable convenience. There are, however, no designated passenger loading and unloading zones, no separation for parents and buses and no barrier free drop off spaces. Drop offs take place along the "N" Street frontage and in the staff parking lot at the west side of the campus. Both locations currently generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and a designated drop off lane is recommended.
The public and main entrance to the school and administrative offices is located along "N" Street and at some distance from the available visitor parking.
Campus Entry
N Street
Kit Carson School
Kit Carson Proposed ‘IB’ School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings.
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but in fair condition. Resurfacing is needed for some areas of the courts and water efficient irrigation recommended for the play fields.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, the Kit Carson School appears to be a fair candidate to support the facility and programmatic transformation to a 7-12 IB School.
Kit Carson has a flourishing academic culture where students are motivated to learn and are excelling in all subject areas. They take responsibility for their daily and long-term success, and they understand the present and future value of what they learn. Students feel safe and encouraged and have confidence in their abilities.
KCS-I
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition poses safety risk andupgrades for barrier free access are needed.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreTrees in quad are in very poor condition, some are dead and others showing signs of decline. Soil is extremely compacted, and planters are too small for long-term survival.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off No designated drop off area. Bus and parent drop off combined along street frontage.. No barrier free drop off space or signage.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Energy & AtmosphereOriginal 1976 system with electric heating coils should be replaced with more efficient hot water heating coils.
Materials & Resources InteriorAreas modified for barrier free access are poorly patched and need new finishes.
Indoor Environmental Quality Casework upgrades for storage and barrier free access is needed in most classrooms.
Water EfficiencyThere are many old, broken and leaking fixtures that do not comply with barrier free access code.
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Indoor Environmental Quality Vocational shop spaces used for storage could be reassigned and modernized for quality effective teaching environments.
Indoor Environmental Quality Areas that do not meet egress or barrier free codes need upgrading.
Kit Carson Proposed ‘IB’ School
KCS-II
Site Plan of Campus
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
The following is a site organizational concept of Kit Carson 7-12 School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff and Student Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (11,436 s.f.)
Grades 7-12 Classrooms,Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers
PROJECT LABSProject Labs (PL) Art/Music/Tech Transformation (11,436 s.f.)Expansion (7,440 s.f.)
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation 6,500 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer Area, Parent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Expansion (4,608 s.f.)
CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity and Grade Configuration Goals of 768- 840(128- 140 students per grade level or 4 Classrooms and Support Spaces
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
N Street
Kit Carson 7-12 School
Rode
o W
ay
54th
Stre
et
Drop
Off
TC
PL
AdminGym
MP
Student Parking
OLC
PL
VisitorParking
PL
PL
PL
Hard Court
Kit Carson Proposed ‘IB’ School
KCS-III
KCS-IV
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 9
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 9 25 118 PointsKCS
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 274,430
$ 60,320
$ 0
$ 574,860
$ 17,550
$ 0
$ 927,160
$ 320,580
$ 26,520
$ 508,560
$ 606,840
$ 1,795,820
$ 0
$ 3,258,320
$ 6,632,990
$ 148,200
$ 35,230
$ 1,114,880
$ 694,200
$ 9,074,780
$ 17,700,280
$ 7,228,000
$ 235,040
$ 543,790
$ 2,296,580
$ 2,507,570
$ 9,074,780
$ 21,885,760
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
Kit Carson Proposed ‘IB’ School
- Remedy traffic congestion- Fix PE lockers- Sound proofing between classrooms- Sound system in multi-purpose room- Garden improvements- Paint gym- Warm water in the rest rooms- Outdoor tables- Computer lab upgrades- Basketball nets and soccer goals- Efficient HVAC system- Additional restrooms- Resurface blacktop- Technology upgrades- Parking lot improvements- Resurface quad
About 20% of the classrooms are on the second floor and served by a ramp and two stairways. The fifty plus year old school was built with little consideration for energy efficiency and improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more efficient lighting and additional newer energy control systems. The existing windows in the primary classrooms are minimal and do not provide a good level of natural light.
Recent and ongoing upgrades to the site and modernization of the "Industrial Arts" wing to serve as computer, computer drafting and art labs are significant improvements. Some upgrades are still needed to comply with code access requirements.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the Quad. This area is adequate and in reasonably good condition and would benefit from the addition of shade trees or canopies. The student snack bar is conveniently adjacent to the Quad. Other outdoor student areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings.
Narrative SummaryRosa Parks Middle School ; one of the District’s Priority Schools, was originally constructed in 1960. Previously named Charles M. Goethe Middle School, the site is just over 13 acres in a fully developed neighborhood and is adjacent to an elementary school to the south and a city park to the southeast. The properties are separated by 6' chain link fences.
The school was built in 1960 with a design shared by four other schools in the district and is in generally fair condition. It previously had an enrollment of nearly 800 but currently serves just 471 students.
Access to the school is from 68th Avenue just west of 24th Street. There is no turn a round for buses but a loop route to and from major streets is available although long. There are also no designated passenger loading and unloading zones. Drop offs currently take place along the 68th Avenue frontage and in the staff parking lot. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades for paving and striping to the parking lot and service drives. Some path of travel upgrades have been made but more are needed. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and separate designated drop off lanes for bus and parent use are recommended.
Campus Entry
68th Avenue
Rosa Parks Middle School
Rosa Parks Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
RPMS-I
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment and in fair condition. Some areas need resurfacing and striping. More efficient irrigation and water management for the fields would be a recommended improvement.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Rosa Parks Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Statement pending input from school
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition and drainage poses safety riskand maintenance issues.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreThe Quad area is large enough but without shade does not promote education and informal gathering opportunities.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parent drop off takes place in the staff parking lot creating potentially hazardous traffic conflicts. Additionally there in no barrier free drop off space.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior Backflow prevention serves fields but not the rest of the campus. Domestic water and irrigation water are not separated. Cross contamination possible.
Energy & AtmosphereOld fluorescent fixtures have T-8 bulbs. Update with new more efficient fixtures.
Materials & Resources ExteriorInadequate slopes and drainage causes standing water that damages roofing.
Indoor Environmental Quality Casework and fixtures need to be upgraded to comply with barrier free access requirements.
Rosa Parks Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorUpgrade fixtures with Low flow automatic metering fittings.
Materials & Resources InteriorInsufficient outlets and low voltage cabling run in surfaceraceways or exposed in classrooms.
RPMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
68th Avenue
Rosa Parks Middle School
Rosa Parks Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan of Campus
RPMS-III
The following is a site organizational concept of Rosa Parks Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (46,268 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (6,079 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (8,400 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
PL
OLCOLC
Campus Quad
Staff Parking
CampusCampusEntryEntry
Drop Off
TCVisitor/Parent
OLC
Gym
MP
Campus Campus EntryEntry
OLC
OLCAdmin.
RPMS-IV
Rosa Parks Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 4 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 10
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 10 25 118 PointsRPMS
NEEDS:
- School security
- Cameras outside
- Technology ready classrooms
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 1,370,330
$ 144,560
$ 33,020
$ 753,480
$ 98,150
$ 0
$ 2,399,540
$ 1,385,540
$ 53,560
$ 451,100
$ 3,069,820
$ 3,875,300
$ 0
$ 8,835,320
$ 6,123,780
$ 374,530
$ 0
$ 4,320,160
$ 1,762,800
$ 5,675,800
$ 18,257,070
$ 8,879,650
$ 572,650
$ 484,120
$ 8,143,460
$ 5,736,250
$ 5,675,,800
$ 29,491,930
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
There are 7 classrooms on the second floor served by a ramp and two stairways. The fifty year old school was built with little consideration for energy efficiency but improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows, lighting and mechanical systems. Benefits could also be gained through more effective energy control systems. The school has undergone some improvements and Building 3 is currently undergoing some modernization. Upgrades for code access compliance however, are still needed throughout the campus. Classrooms previously used for vocational shops are used for storage or converted to other uses.
The campus core is secured by ornamental steel gates and fencing and the student gathering areas of the campus appear adequate and well maintained. The campus core has a large quad with a concrete platform for events and areas adjacent to the snack bar for outdoor eating.
Narrative SummaryThe site is just over 22 acres in a fully developed neighborhood and adjacent to Cabrillo Elementary School and a community park with tennis and swim facilities. The school was built in 1961, it is in generally fair condition and currently serves 706 students.
Vehicle access uses fairly wide neighborhood streets and a loop route is available that helps avoid some potential conflicts. The entry to the school is clear with convenient visitor parking. However, there are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones nor a barrier free drop off space. Drop offs currently take place along the Elmer Way frontage, where sidewalks are narrow, and in the staff parking lot at the north end of the campus. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades to the visitor parking lot and entry walkways but the staff parking lots need paving and path of travel upgrades. At a minimum, a barrier free drop off space is required and a designated drop off lane is recommended along Elmer Way.
Campus Entry
Elmer
Way
Sam Brannan Middle School
Sam Brannan Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission StatementOur goal is to inspire, enrich, and challenge the developing minds of middle school children. We strive to create a safe and secure learning environment ensuring students are provided an optimum learning experience. Our learning community consists of caring, compassionate and committed students, parents, and faculty that aim to make SBMS a true school of excellence.
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
SBMS-I
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but in fair condition. Resurfacing is needed.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Sam Brannan Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityBleachers are in poor condition and are not compliant with barrier free access requirements.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreWalks are concrete and generally good. Some railing, grates and steps do not comply with current access codes.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parent and bus combined in street right of way. Rolled curb without barrier free curb ramps and warnings.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior Irrigation controllers manage part of the campus with balance manually watered. Recommend updating with “smart” system to comply with city conservation ordinance.
Energy & AtmosphereAppears no kitchen cooling or heating except for the transfer air and a single gas unit heater. Hood at oven is too small.
Materials & Resources ExteriorBuilt-up roofing with significant standing water due to poor slopes and inadequate drainage.
Indoor Environmental Quality Cabinets do not provide sufficient storage and do not comply with barrier free requirements.
Sam Brannan Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorNew metering water conserving valves and fittings should be installed at all fixture locations.
Materials & Resources InteriorOld flooring tile is vinyl asbestos in poor condition and should be replaced.
SBMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Sam Brannan Middle School
Site Plan of Campus
SBMS-III
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
The following is a site organizational concept of Sam Brannan Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (53,600 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation/Expansion(6,160 s.f.) Media Center, Computer Lab
Parent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (0)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
Sam Brannan Middle School
Elmer
Way
MP
Gym
Admin.
Campus Campus EntryEntry
OLC
OLC
OLC
TC
PL
PL
PL
Drop Off
SBMS-IV
Sam Brannan Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 1
TOTAL 118 8
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 8 25 118 PointsSBMS
- Technology upgrades
- Fix the hallway locker issue
- Improve the athletic fields
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 798,980
$ 5,330
$ 0
$ 721,760
$555,620
$ 0
$2,081,690
$ 906,750
$ 140,270
$ 850,590
$ 3,780,400
$ 5,127,200
$ 0
$10,805,210
$ 4,561,310
$ 208,260
$ 0
$ 1,913,080
$ 1,907,230
$ 9,972,820
$18,562,700
$ 6,267,040
$ 353,860
$ 850,590
$ 6,415,240
$ 7,590,050
$ 9,972,820
$31,449,600
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
Benefits could also be gained through more efficient lighting and effective energy control systems.
The structure is primarily steel and masonry with large areas of window wall systems including awning windows and spandrel panels. The condition and age of the windows and window system shows signs of deterioration and has numerous leaks. In addition to the overall condition issues, the windows and panels are single glazed un-insulated and inefficient. The interior corridors on the second and third floors of the main classroom building are wide and lined with lockers, but access to and from the classrooms does not comply with code. These conditions will likely require significant upgrades with any future modernization. The design of the school is dated and the classrooms and amenity areas reflect the age of the school with some deterioration and many barrier free access issues.
The student snack bar has access to the Quad for outdoor eating. The gathering areas of the campus appear adequate and in reasonably good condition. The campus core has a small "Quad" area that appears underutilized.
The campus core is secured by unsightly ornamental steel gates and fencing.
Narrative SummaryThe site is 7.5 acres in a confined fully developed semi-urban location and is un-suitably small for this middle school. A typical suburban site for this size school would be at least twice the area. The school was built in 1958 and serves just over 1,200 students with most of the classrooms on second and third floors.
Access to the campus is along "I" Street just off Alhambra Blvd. A drop off lane was added along "I" Street but conflicts with traffic into and out of the parking areas remain. There is no convenient turn a round or loop routing for buses. Parking is less than adequate and adversely affects student circulation. In addition to street, parking and drive conflicts there are significant "path of travel" issues around and within the campus. While the area is served by public transportation, there is no fully compliant path of travel to the campus. These are apt to become major circumstances with future modernization.
The upper floors are served by stairs and a single elevator. The fifty plus year old school was built with little consideration for energy efficiency and improvements could be made through the use of more efficient windows, wall systems and mechanical systems.
Campus Entry
I Street
Sutter Middle School
Sutter Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
SMS-I
The site can be accessed from "J" Street by larger vehicles and from Alhambra Blvd. by smaller service vehicles.
The athletic fields and paved play courts are small for the current enrollment and in fair condition. Resurfacing is needed. Library Media Center for small group activities.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Sutter Middle School appears to be in just fair condition and suitable for further modernization although upgrades required for code compliance could be extensive.
J Street
Alha
mbr
a Bl
vd.
Create an academic environment where every classroom is focused on learning so that every Sutter Miner has an equal chance of success here, in high school, in college, and in their career. Students will be able to critically think, problem solve, work collaboratively, and be proficient writers, all skills necessary in the 21st Century.
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition poses safety risk.
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreDoes not promote education and informal gathering opportunities. Recommend updating irrigation to campus wide “smart system.”
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Parent & bus drop off on narrow residential street frontage conflicts with parking and path of travel creating serious hazards.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Energy & AtmosphereReplace old improperly sized equipment with new efficient equipment.
Materials & Resources ExteriorBoth built up and steel roofs are in poor condition. Built up roofs have slope and drainage problems.
Indoor Environmental Quality Inadequate storage combined with casework, plumbing, floors and circulation not compliant with barrier free requirements, creates less than suitable learning environments.
Sutter Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorReplace outdated and inefficient fixtures with efficient barrier free fixtures.
Materials & Resources InteriorDoors do not comply with CBC due to wall thickness created by recessed lockers in corridors.
SMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Indoor Environmental Quality Exposed conduit, patches in VAT tile floor and no acoustic treatment on walls and ceiling in Multi-Purpose room creates a less than quality environment .
I Street
Sutter Middle School
Sutter Middle School
Site Plan of Campus
SMS-III
J Street
Alha
mbr
a Bl
vd.
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
The following is a site organizational concept of Sutter Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYCORE ACADEMIC (47,207 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Science & TechnologyLabs & Teacher Planning Centers.
ACTIVE LEARNINGProject Labs (PL) Transformation Art/Music/Tech.
SUPPORT Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Expansion (8,500 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (11,000 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
OLC
Gym
MP
OLC
Drop Off & Parking
Staff Parking
OLC
OLC
Visitor
Admin
TC
PL
PL
TC
SMS-IV
Sutter Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 9
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 9 25 118 PointsSMS
- Technology (ELMO's & smart boards for the classrooms)
- School needs more electrical outlets
- Working AC/Heaters throughout the school
- Add A/C to multi-purpose room and gym.
- More security cameras
- More white boards for the classrooms
- New windows
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 769,600
$ 96,070
$ 321,750
$ 1,761,630
$ 572,650
$ 0
$ 3,521,700
$ 826,410
$ 939,120
$ 4,715,100
$ 4,135,560
$ 5,018,780
$ 0
$ 15,634,970
$ 1,736,150
$ 1,634,230
$ 128,050
$ 8,109,920
$ 1,138,410
$ 11,613,940
$ 24,360,700
$ 3,332,160
$ 2,669,420
$ 5,164,900
$ 14,007,110
$ 6,729,840
$ 11,613,940
$ 43,517,370
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal
efficiency. Some of Building "E", previously used as IndustrialArts studies has been converted to serve other needs including storage and classrooms. The school has undergone other improvements but most areas still need considerable upgrades for CBC Access Compliance and to meet contemporary educational needs.
The student gathering areas of the campus are primarily associated with the "Quad" which is adequate for school gatherings and in reasonably good condition. Other outdoor student areas include landscape planters, some with benches, between classroom buildings. The large ramp however, in the court between classroom wings, has created concerns for safety and visibility in the core area. The need for cameras to monitor the area behind the gym building and around the portables has also been noted. Some covered walk roofs are leaking and rainwater flowing from the roofs create large, hazardous puddles on the walks. Water drainage is also an issue adding to the problem.
Narrative SummaryWill C. Wood Middle School; one of the District’s Priority Schools was constructed in 1961. The site is just under 19 acres in a fully developed neighborhood and adjacent, on the east side, to 65th Street Expressway.
The school’s design is shared by four other schools in the district and is in generally fair condition. Designed for an enrollment of 800 it currently serves 771 students.
There are no designated passenger loading and unloading zones. Drop offs currently take place along the Lemon Hill Ave. frontage and in the staff parking lot. Both locations generate traffic conflicts and unsafe conditions. There have been recent upgrades for paving and striping to the parking lot and service drives. Some path of travel upgrades have been made but more are needed.
About 20% of the permanent classrooms are on the second floor and served by a single ramp and two stairways. Nine of the 49 classrooms are in portables. As with other schools of the period, the fifty year old school was built with little consideration for energy
Campus Entry
Will C. Wood Middle School
Will C. Wood Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
School Mission Statement
‘Student Centered Education’
Site Plan of Campus
School Location Legend
WWMS-I
Lemon Hill Avenue
65th
Stet
Exp
ress
way
The athletic fields and paved play courts are adequate for the current enrollment but in fair condition.
Based on the opportunities, facility conditions and code issues identified in this report, Will C. Wood Middle School appears to be in generally fair condition and should be a solid candidate for further modernization.
Success For Every Student“Students actively preparing to
become academically and socially capable of meeting the challenges of the 21st century.”
Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition poses safety risk
Sustainable Sites Campus CoreAmple space but uninviting without shade. Concrete walks and surfaces are uneven and broken.
Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off No designated bus or parent drop off. Parent drop off in staff parking lot with congestion & conflicts. No barrier free drop off space or path of travel,
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012
Water Efficiency Exterior Upgraded irrigation and drought tolerant planting should be incorporated for water conservation.
Energy & AtmosphereUpgrade or replace older energy management system to include all rooms, door/window interlocks and plug load controls.
Materials & Resources ExteriorStanding water on roofs due to inadequate slopes and drainage.
Indoor Environmental Quality Replace casework, fixtures and fittings to meet barrier free access code.
Will C. Wood Middle School
Water Efficiency InteriorReplace old fixtures & fittings with new efficient low flow fixtures that are barrier free access compliant.
Materials & Resources InteriorAreas with patched tile and other materials and finishes should be re-surfaced with new material.
WWMS-II
High Performance Transformation
Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.
Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.
Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.
Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.
Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.
Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.
Campus EntryCampus Entry
Will C. Wood Middle School
Will C. Wood Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master Plan
June 2012Site Plan of Campus
WWMS-III
Lemon Hill Avenue
65th
Stet
Exp
ress
way
PL
OLCOLC
TC
Campus Quad
Staff Parking
Visitor/ParentCampusCampusEntryEntry
OLC
The following is a site organizational concept of Will C. Wood Middle School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children Firstand the Common Core Standards.
SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off
Visitor/Staff Parking
Outdoor Learning Courts.
CAREER & COLLEGE READYAcademic Pathway Transformation (46,268 s.f.)
Grades 7 & 8 Classroom Houses, Includes Core Academic, Learning Labs; Science & Technology Labs & Teacher Planning Centers.
Specialized Learning Lab TransformationProject Labs (PL); Art/Music/Tech.
Support Support Spaces – distributed
FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (6,079 s.f.)
Media Center, Computer LabParent Center & Conference Room and Teacher Planning Center.
Multi-Purpose (MP)Gym
ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom Conversion / Expansion (8,400 s.f.)
Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals
‘Student Centered Education’
PL
TC
Drop Off
Admin.
OLC
Gym
MP
OLC
OLC
WWMS-IV
Will C. Wood Middle School
SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sustainable Facilities Master PlanJune 2012
School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:
CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools
Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”
In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.
SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points
Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1
Sustainable Sites 14 5 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental
Quality 23/25 2
TOTAL 118 11
Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing
0 11 25 118 PointsWWMS
• More school security
• Art class
• Security cameras
• School gates modified to prevent access to roof tops and to prevent vandalism
• Gym bleachers refurbished (electrical bleachers are needed)
• More hand dryers for student bathrooms
• Lighting - type of lighting and how they turn on/off
• More lights on campus and fields
Indoor Environmental Quality- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems
Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems
Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off
- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure
Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure
- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems
Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish
Leadership, Education & Innovation- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation
Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost
Cod
e, L
ife S
afet
y &
Acc
ess
Mai
nten
ance
&
Ope
ratio
ns
High
Per
form
ance
Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n
Project Cost Summary Matrix
Schools as Teaching Tools
$ 417,950
$ 16,770
$ 0
$ 377,650
$ 81,380
$ 0
$ 893,750
$ 1,397,370
$ 8,190
$ 910
$ 2,055,950
$ 833,690
$ 0
$ 4,296,110
$ 4,208,360
$ 118,560
$ 317,200
$ 1,804,660
$ 608,270
$11,686,610
$18,743,660
$ 6,023,680
$ 143,520
$ 318,110
$ 4,238,260
$ 1,523,340
$11,686,610
$23,933,520
Sust
aina
ble
Cat
egor
y To
tal