Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement … KPI Data Q2 KPI Data Q3 KPI Data Q4/EOY KPI...

2011-2012

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

Submit Updated SIP Forms to [email protected]

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

Division Goals and School Board Priorities Goal 1

Prepare all students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

Priority 1.1

Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

Goal 2

Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Priority 2.1 Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Goal 3

Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Priority 3.1 Improve the organization's capacity to build and maintain a high-quality workforce.

Goal 4

Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Priority 4.1

Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

Priority 4.2 Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Goal 5

Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s

vision, mission, and goals.

Priority 5.1 Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

Priority 5.2 Implement the Division's Student Information System (SIS) and Parent Portal.

http://schoolcenter.k12albemarle.org/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sc_id=1301600869403&sectiondetailid=97231

http://schoolcenter.k12albemarle.org/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=97266





General Information

School Name: Cale Elementary

Principal Name: Lisa Jones

Members of School

Improvement Team:

SIP Team - Team Leaders

Virginia Coleman - K

Mark Guerin – 1st

Amanda Brookman – 2nd

Carrie Oertel – 3rd

Chelsey Lundgren – 4th

Virginia Zapata – 5th

Mike Irani – Assistant Principal

Laura Lewis – ESOL

Kelly Lee – Title

Amber Gibson – Special education

Angela Stokes – Reading Data Coach

Lisa Jones – Principal



School Improvement Plan – SIP Goal 1

2011-2012

Strategic Goal(s): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

X Goal 1: Prepare all Students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

X Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Goal 3: Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Goal 4: Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Goal 5: Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s


PL

AN

Board Priority(ies): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

X Priority 1.1: Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

X Priority 2.1: Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Priority 4.1: Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

Priority 4.2: Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Priority 5.1: Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

SIP Goal: Students will be able to read and write for authentic purpose and communicate effectively. All students will experience rigor

through a high quality curriculum and engaging instruction.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound): Develop and implement cumulative assessments that

require students to demonstrate competencies in Reading and Writing. Collect a body of evidence that demonstrates implementation of best

practices in literacy instruction and collect a body of evidence that measures growth.

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence:






Reading

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Black 83.9 85.4 81.6 84

Hispanic 65.5 77.3 89.1 71.7

White 93.5 92.1 86.8 95

Disadvantaged 71.6 76.1 86 68.1

Anticipated Obstacles:

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

ST

UD

Y

KPI (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4/EOY KPI Data

1. 3rd

– 5th

common quarterly

assessment K – 72%

1st – 76%

2nd

– 78%

3rd

– 70%

4th

– 81%

5th

– 80%

K- 78%

1st- 80%

2nd

– 79%

*students target for

K- 81%

1st – 83%

2nd

- 81%

K- 84%

1st – 85%

2nd

– 81%

2. Mid –year Reading

Assessment – SOL Released, 3rd

,

4th

and 5th

3rd

grade – 77%

4th

Grade – 73%

5th

Grade – 73%

This assessment also

includes material that

still needs to be taught.

Reading SOL TEST

3rd

– 86.7

4th

– 86.9

5th

– 85.6



Key Strategies and Qualitative

Progress Indicators

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies & EOY

Reflections

1. Administer, Interpret and

understand the value of literacy

assessments. Common

assessments will be administered,

charted and analyzed to create an

action plan using DIAL sheets for

class and team.

Common assessments

were given; DIAL is

used in PLC meetings to

inform instruction.

1st quarter data

analyzed, teams met to

realign pacing guide.

Teams focused on

common instructional

strategies and weekly

salons addressed an area

of focus.

Weekly Salon on

reading strategies and

analyzed data to target

intervention plans.

Salons on writing,

instructional strategies

and using engineering

in reading.

DO

&

2. Demonstrate best practices in

literacy instruction through

differentiation.

Established Learning

targets aligned writing

expectations and

specific strategies to

connect and integrate in

other content areas.

Each team weekly

shared out an

instructional strategy

their team was focused

on and how they were

implementing in the

classroom. i.e..

metacognition,

questioning , using

technology in Daily 5

rotation.

Team continued to

meet work with weekly

with reading data coach

and instructional

coaches.

Teams continue to meet

with instructional data

coaches and PLC

ST

UD

Y &

3. Teachers will demonstrate and

implement a plan for how they

manage and organize a balanced

literacy block.

1st quarter review teams

shared how they manage

blocks and identified

areas of focus for the 2nd

quarter.

Every classroom was

observed during the

literacy block, using the

ACPS Literacy

classroom look –fors.

Teams were provided

Teams plan for how to

use time for 2012- 13



feedback and

established goals for

target work in the 3rd

qrt

4. Establish Focus Achievement

Team for Reading. Data Coach

will work with intervention team

to analyze reading data, learning

targets and work together with

grade level teams to establish

learning plans for identified

students.

Teams met, identified

Learning salons for 2nd

quarter. Created

intervention plans and

worked with PLC teams

on RTI.

Thursday Salons were

planned for each grade

level to respond to

current data and plan

accordingly

Target Data Sheets for

individual learning

goals

Data analyzed for

intervention for 2012-

13

AC

T

5. Every grade level team will

meet with Administrative review

team each quarter to review – How

using assessment to determine

instruction, - How fluid

differentiated instruction is

occurring and how they manage

the block of literacy time.

Each team met with

review panel to review

1st quarter goals and

plan for 2nd

quarter.

Mid – year Review

Vertical conversation



School Improvement Plan – SIP Goal 2

2011-2012

Strategic Goal(s): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

X Goal 1: Prepare all Students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

X Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Goal 3: Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Goal 4: Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Goal 5: Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s


PL

AN

Board Priority(ies): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

X Priority 1.1: Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

X Priority 2.1: Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Priority 4.1: Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

Priority 4.2: Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Priority 5.1: Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

SIP Goal: Students will demonstrate improved analytical and critical skills as evidenced by improved problem solving in achievement in

mathematics.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound): Develop and implement cumulative assessments

that require students to demonstrate competencies in the ACPS Life Long Learning Standards. Increased SOL pass rates in all membership

groups. Teams will develop common rigorous assessments that measure problem solving that will demonstrate 95% mastery. Classroom

Walk through data will show 65% of middle to high levels of blooms and 55% of classrooms walkthroughs will report evidence of engaging

qualities.






Supporting Data / Gap Evidence:

Math

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Black 73.3 63.4 86.8 80.8

Hispanic 74.2 75.6 93.5 87.7

White 93.5 92.1 96.9 93.8

Disadvantaged 77.3 69.9 88.2 86.7

School Wide strategies are based on the following:

PLC teams consistently to work on clear learning targets, monitoring and assessing student progress and instructional strategies. The implementation of

the Framework for Quality Learning will provide the structure for establishing differentiated teaching practices that encourage and promote critical

thinking and life –long learning. PLC Teams need to establish long and short term goals based on what they know, understand and will do to achieve their

goals.

Know:

• How to determine Clear Learning Targets

• How to use concepts and enduring understandings to organize topics and content

• Questioning techniques

• Key instructional strategies

• How to use assessment to inform instructional practice

Understand:

• Best practice requires monitoring instruction bases upon student need – as demonstrated in student work.

• A variety of strategies and models are incorporated into best practice in order to meet the needs of all learners.

• Instructional best practice uses concepts and enduring understanding to organize learning objectives.

• Questioning techniques are focused on clear learning goals – and encourage higher level thinking from all students.

• Professional Learning Communities support teachers in their efforts to bring best practice to classroom instruction

Be Able to Do:

• Write and deliver a lesson developed around best practice.



• Incorporate concepts and enduring understandings into all teaching practice

• Develop / Use high level questions to help guide student learning

• Deliver instruction that is focused on students’ needs from current classroom data related to learning objectives

• Differentiate Instruction

• Reflect upon lessons and modify them in order to develop best practice

• Observe and critique- give reflective feedback to colleagues.

Anticipated Obstacles:

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

ST

UD

Y

KPI (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4/EOY KPI Data

1. End of 1st quarter common

math assessments.

84% K-82%

1st –92%

2nd

-79%

3rd

- 73%

4th

– 74*

5th

– 78%

K-85%

1st – 90%

2nd

-81%

3rd

- 88%

4th

– 84%

5th

– 79%

Math – SOL

3rd

– 63.6%

4th

– 61.9%

5th

– 54.6%

2.

Key Strategies and Qualitative

Progress Indicators

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies & EOY

Reflections



1. Frequent Assessment

Monitoring - All teams will collect

and analyze common assessments

every 4 ½ weeks and create and

action plan using the DIAL sheet

for their classes. All data in

School Net.

All Grade levels have

administered common

4 ½ week and quarterly

assessments and created

intervention plans for

students who fell below

the benchmarks.

Grade levels

administered common 4

½ assessments as well as

mid- year assessments to

adjust pacing and inform

instructional decisions

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

Data analyzed for

2012-13

DO

&

2. Every PLC Team will create a

meeting and assessment timeline in

accordance with their pacing

guide.

Teams created quarterly

timelines to schedule

and arrange meetings

and work.

Teams met with

administration to share

3rd

quarter goals

Team met to establish

4th

quarter goals

Continued

ST

UD

Y &

3. Each Team will design

enrichment plans, units and

resources and grade level projects

that reflect project based learning,

mid to high levels of Blooms, and

high yield strategies.

PLC teams have met

with GRT and

instructional coaches

and planned enrichment

Partnership with UVA

school of Engineering.

Robotics Club

Teams continue to

develop and implement

units that provide

students learning

activities that challenge

them to solve and

problem and integrate

into other areas of the

curriculum.

Continued Continued

4. Teams will meet with

administrative staff to review

assessment data and team plans

after each 4 ½ week assessments

and plan for Extended Learning

time

Teams met with Admin

to review next step and

plans for Extended

learning time

AC

T



5. PLC teams consistently work

on clear learning targets,

monitoring and assessing student

progress and instructional

strategies. The implantation of the

Framework for Quality Learning

will provide the structure.

Each team met with

Admin for Quarterly

review. Intervention

and Enrichment plans

reviewed.

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement … KPI Data Q2 KPI Data Q3 KPI Data Q4/EOY KPI...

Documents

Transcript of Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement … KPI Data Q2 KPI Data Q3 KPI Data Q4/EOY KPI...