Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species...
-
Upload
blaise-briggs -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species...
![Page 1: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Alan Tye
Weed Risk Assessment-Galapagos
Johanna Mader
Chris BuddenhagenHawai’i Invasive Species [email protected]
Paul Pheloung
![Page 2: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Someone proposes to introduce a new ornamental plant or crop species. Do you permit it to enter?
What decisions do we mean?
• You have 500 introduced plant species in your country, and you know the top 10 invaders. But which of the many plants in people’s gardens might become the next problem?
• You have a plant known to be a serious weed on other islands, but it is still only found in small areas in your country. Can it be eradicated completely?
![Page 3: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A process:
1. Weed inventories
2. Evaluate invasiveness and impact, or risk of it, for each species.
3. Decide if and how to manage each species.
4. Start eradication- reassess feasibility as you go.
Some principles for Weed Risk Assessment and Weed Management
![Page 4: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Small number of introduced
species- good baseline
before 450 (2001)812 total542 cult.270 wild62 NaQ
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Genov
esa
Santa
Fé
Pinzón
Ferna
ndina
Pinta
Españo
la
Santia
go
Florean
a
Isabela
San C
ristó
bal
Santa
Cru
z
![Page 5: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Not Present in GalapagosNot Present
in Galapagos
High RiskHigh Risk
Exclude
Exclude
Low RiskLow Risk
Determine action?
Feasibility of Eradication (effort
required)
Feasibility of Eradication (effort
required)
Present in GalapagosPresent in Galapagos
Size of infestationSize of infestation
Number of searches
Number of searches
Attempt eradication
Attempt eradication
High RiskHigh Risk
Weed Risk AssessmentWeed Risk
Assessment
2 Steps to Managing Plant Introductions2 Steps to Managing Plant Introductions
1. WRA
2. Action
re-assess
![Page 6: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Environmental focus (but include agricultural, forestry, health etc considerations).
• Intended to permit review of all known introduced plants; species not yet introduced which could be a
risk.
• Produce an risk index for each species.
• Classify each species into one of five invasiveness impact/risk categories.
• Easily adaptable for any island or archipelago.
Features of the Galapagos and Galapagos WRAs:
![Page 7: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Changes to questions and in Galapagos section
Naturalization - Viable seed production
Naturalization - Evidence of seedlings produced without human assistance
Naturalization - Evidence of two or more generations of adult plants
Invasiveness - Evidence of long distance propagule dispersal and establishment
Invasiveness - Evidence of establishment in natural ecosystems (with little human disturbance)
Invasiveness - Current status
Already growing wild in the National Park in the arid zone
En la zona húmeda del Parque Nacional
Presente en dos o más islas
Presente en islas no habitadas
![Page 8: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Five invasive status categories:
A Transformer: already a habitat transformer in Galapagos (includes hybridizers with endemics).
B Potential transformer: naturalized in Galapagos and known as a habitat
transformer elsewhere-or early signs of impact potential.
C Integrator: naturalized in Galapagos but integrating into native
vegetation without causing major habitat change (mainly small weeds).
D Potential invader: not naturalized in Galapagos but a potential invader
(based on behaviour elsewhere).
E Probably harmless: only cultivated in Galapagos (not naturalized) and not
known as an invader elsewhere.
8
![Page 9: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
12 Key Questions that influence the environmental impact categorization:
Behaviour elsewhere:3.04 Environmental weed that is a transformer in natural areas
(elsewhere) 3.05 Other species in same genus are serious invaders elsewhere, or are native or naturalised in Galapagos
Potential environmental impact:5.04 Smothering growth habit. 5.05 Forms dense thickets, particularly woody perennials. 5.06 Is a tree, woody perennial shrub, grass, geophyte or vine.
6.03 Capable of interspecific hybridization. 6.04 Endemic congeneric species present in Galapagos.
![Page 10: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Present in Galapagos? [Yes or no]
Behaviour in Galapagos:9.01 Viable seed production 9.02 Evidence of seedlings produced without human assistance 9.03 Evidence of two or more generations of adult plants 9.07 Current invasive status [Don't know, Integrator, Transformer,
Potential transformer]
12 Key Questions that influence the environmental impact categorization:
![Page 11: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Management options for plants already introduced:
• Do nothing – (E Harmless; C Integrators)
For Transformers, Potential Transformers and Potential
Invaders:
• Eradication
• Containment/Exclusion
• Site-specific control
• Biological control
![Page 13: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
>2000 ha
![Page 15: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Rubus megalococcusRubus megalococcus August 2000 August 2000
![Page 16: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Weed Eradication Feasibility Analysis
Oscar Cacho & Paul PheloungSchool of Economics
University of New EnglandAUSTRALIA
Collaboration: Danny Spring, Susie Hester, Dane Panetta, Chris Buddenhagen
![Page 18: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ISSUES
a) How can we measure weed detectability?
b) How many search/control missions are required to eradicate an invasion?
c) How intensive should these missions be?
d) What is the probability of eradication in x years if we invest y dollars?
e) How do attributes of the weed and the environment affect all this?
![Page 19: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Weed Eradication Feasibility Analysis
Oscar Cacho & Paul PheloungSchool of Economics
University of New EnglandAUSTRALIA
Collaboration: Danny Spring, Susie Hester, Dane Panetta, Chris Buddenhagen
![Page 20: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ISSUES
a) How can we measure weed detectability?
b) How many search/control missions are required to eradicate an invasion?
c) How intensive should these missions be?
d) What is the probability of eradication in x years if we invest y dollars?
e) How do attributes of the weed and the environment affect all this?
![Page 21: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Modelling eradication feasibility
Modelling eradication feasibility
Mature PlantsMature Plants
Seed bankSeed bankYear …Year …Year 3Year 3Year 2Year 2Year 1Year 1
Juvenile PlantsJuvenile Plants
Year…Year…Year 3Year 3Year 2Year 2Year 1Year 1
Search +Control
efficiency
![Page 22: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MODELLING STRATEGY
Search theory
Population dynamics(stage matrix model)
Economic theoryOptimisation techniques
Demographic parameters
Input requirements (labour, chemicals)
Input costs
Invasion costs(environmental
services)
Probabilities
Search parameters
proportion detected and killed
size of invasionsize of seedbank
Optimal strategies:search effort,
cost of control program,years to eradication,
allocation of limited budget
control feedback
![Page 23: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SEARCH THEORY
• initially developed to improve success rate in detecting military targets
• relates search effort to probability of detection of an object
• the concepts of Coverage (c) and Effective Sweep Width (R) are key features of the theory
A
TRSc
S = search speed (m/h)T = search time (h)R = effective sweep width (m)A = search area (m2)
R measures the detectability of the object in the given environment
![Page 24: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
sear
ch p
ath
(A) (A)
(B) (B)
Effective Sweep Width
Lateral range (m)
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f d
etec
tio
n
LATERAL RANGE CURVES
![Page 25: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
definite range
parallel tracks
random search
Coverage (c)
Pro
po
rtio
n d
etec
ted
(p d)
PROBABILITY OF DETECTION
![Page 26: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
PROJECTION MATRIX
A =
0 0 0 1500
0.251 0.251 0 0
0.026 0.026 0 0
0 0 0.050 0.464
new seedsseedbank
juveniles
mature
xt =
x1 x2 x3 x4
xt+1 =A xt
= 1.5
( = er)
![Page 27: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Parameter Value Description T 1.0 Time searching (h/ha) S 1,000 Speed of search (m/h) R 20 Perceptual range (m) K 0.95 Effectiveness of control agent
Parameter Value Description f31, f32 0.05 Germination rate f43 0.02 Juvenile survival f1n 1,500 Fecundity MT 2 Time to maturity (yr) SL 5 Seed longevity (yr) MS 1.0 Size of adult (m2)
Search parameters
Biological parameters
![Page 28: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Yea
rs t
o e
rad
icat
ion
Search time (h/ha)
YEARS TO ERADICATION VS SEARCH EFFORT
(3) perennial, long-lived seeds
(1) annual
(2) perennial, base
![Page 29: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
INPUTS FOR WEED CONTROL
Data from Budenhagen and Yanez (2005)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000
Stems per ha
Lab
ou
r In
pu
t (h
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000
Stems per haH
erb
icid
e in
pu
t (l
)
Labour Chemicals
![Page 30: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Measuring detectability
Harris, Brown and Timmins (2001), p.13
a depends on plant ageb depends on vantage point
![Page 31: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Lateral range (m)
Cu
mu
lati
ve c
ou
nt
detections
non-detections
½ ESW
Measuring detectability (ESW)
![Page 32: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
MODELLING STRATEGY
Search theory
Population dynamics(stage matrix model)
Economic theoryOptimisation techniques
Demographic parameters
Input requirements (labour, chemicals)
Input costs
Invasion costs(environmental
services)
Probabilities
Search parameters
proportion detected and killed
size of invasionsize of seedbank
Optimal strategies:search effort,
cost of control program,years to eradication,
allocation of limited budget
control feedback
![Page 33: Alan Tye Weed Risk Assessment- Galapagos Johanna Mader Chris Buddenhagen Hawai’i Invasive Species Council christopher.e.buddenhagen@hawaii.gov Paul Pheloung.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef25503460f94c04b71/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)