Alamos corp presentation jan 17 2018 final
-
Upload
alamosgoldinc -
Category
Investor Relations
-
view
72 -
download
0
Transcript of Alamos corp presentation jan 17 2018 final
January 2018 Corporate Presentation
2
Cautionary NotesThis presentation, the information contained herein, any other materials provided in connection with this presentation and any oral remarks accompanying this presentation (collectively, this “Presentation”) has been prepared by Alamos Gold Inc. (“Alamos”) solely for information purposes. No Stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved of the information contained herein. This presentation does not constitute an offering of securities and the information contained herein is subject to the information contained in the Company’s continuous disclosure documents at www.sedar.com.
Cautionary NotesCertain statements in this presentation are “forward-looking statements”, including within the meaning of applicable laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation, including, without limitation, statements Alamos’ net asset value, operating cash flow, free cash flow, forecast gold production, Mineral Reserves, Mineral Resources, exploration potential, gold grades, recoveries, waste-to-ore ratios, total cash cost, all-in sustaining costs, debt levels and future plans and objectives of Alamos are forward-looking statements based on forecasts of future operational or financial results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management that involve various risks and uncertainties. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be “forward-looking statements.” Alamos cautions that forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Alamos’ actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such information, including, but not limited to, gold and silver price volatility; fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates; the impact of any hedging activities; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; costs of production; capital expenditure requirements; the costs and timing of construction and development of new deposits; and the success of exploration and permitting activities. In addition, the factors described or referred to in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Alamos’ Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, which along with other documents setting out risk factors affecting the Company is available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com, should be reviewed in conjunction with the information found in this presentation. Although Alamos has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there can be other factors that cause results, performance or achievements not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate or that management’s expectations or estimates of future developments, circumstances or results will materialize. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Market data and other statistical information used throughout this Presentation are based on internal company research, independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or their published independent sources. Industry publications, governmental publications, market research surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Although Alamos believes such information is accurate and reliable, it has not independently verified any of the data from third party sources cited or used for our management’s industry estimates, nor has Alamos ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. While Alamos believes internal company estimates are reliable, such estimates have not been verified by any independent sources, and Alamos makes no representations as to the accuracy of such estimates.
Note to U.S. InvestorsAlamos prepares its disclosure in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Terms relating to Mineral Resources in this presentation are defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The Unites States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. Alamos may use certain terms, such as “Measured Mineral Resources”, “Indicated Mineral Resources”, “Inferred Mineral Resources” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” that the SEC does not recognize (these terms may be used in this presentation and are included in the public filings of Alamos, which have been filed with the SEC and the securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada).
Cautionary non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP MeasuresNote that for purposes of this section, GAAP refers to IFRS. The Company believes that investors use certain non-GAAP and additional GAAP measures as indicators to assess gold mining companies. They are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared with GAAP.
“Cash flow from operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital” is a non-GAAP performance measure that could provide an indication of the Company’s ability to generate cash flows from operations, and is calculated by adding back the change in non-cash working capital to “Cash provided by (used in) operating activities” as presented on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. “Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP performance measure that is calculated as cash flows from operations net of cash flows invested in mineral property, plant and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets as presented on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows and that would provide an indication of the Company’s ability to generate cash flows from its mineral projects. “Mine site free cash flow” is a non-GAAP measure which includes cash flow from operating activities at, less capital expenditures at each mine site. Return on Equity is defined as Earnings from Continuing Operations divided by the average Total Equity for the current and previous year. “Mining cost per tonne of ore” and “Cost per tonne of ore” are non-GAAP performance measures that could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency and effectiveness of the mine. These measures are calculated by dividing the relevant mining and processing costs and total costs by the tonnes of ore processed in the period. “Cost per tonne of ore” is usually affected by operating efficiencies and waste-to-ore ratios in the period. “Total cash costs per ounce”, “all-in sustaining costs per ounce”, and “mine-site all-in sustaining costs” as used in this analysis are non-GAAP terms typically used by gold mining companies to assess the level of gross margin available to the Company by subtracting these costs from the unit price realized during the period. These non-GAAP terms are also used to assess the ability of a mining company to generate cash flow from operations. There may be some variation in the method of computation of these metrics as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. In this context, “total cash costs” reflects mining and processing costs allocated from in-process and dore inventory associated and associated royalties with ounces of gold sold in the period. Total cash costs per ounce are exclusive of exploration costs. “All-in sustaining costs per ounce” include total cash costs, exploration, corporate and administrative, share based compensation and sustaining capital costs. “Mine-site all-in sustaining costs” include total cash costs, exploration, and sustaining capital costs for the mine-site, but exclude an allocation of corporate and administrative and share based compensation.
Additional GAAP measures that are presented on the face of the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income and are not meant to be a substitute for other subtotals or totals presented in accordance with IFRS, but rather should be evaluated inconjunction with such IFRS measures. This includes “Earnings from operations”, which is intended to provide an indication of the Company’s operating performance, and represents the amount of earnings before net finance income/expense, foreign exchange gain/loss, other income/loss, and income tax expense. Non-GAAP and additional GAAP measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. A reconciliation ofhistorical non-GAAP and additional GAAP measures are available at www.alamosgold.com.
Technical InformationChris Bostwick, FAusIMM, Alamos Gold’s Vice President, Technical Services, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation. Chris Bostwick is a Qualified Person within the meaning of Canadian Securities Administrator’s National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). The Qualified Persons for the National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral reserve and resource estimates are detailed in the tables in the appendix of this presentation. Information pertaining to the geological and exploration content has been reviewed and approved by Aoife McGrath, Alamos' Vice President, Exploration, a Qualified Person.
All figures in US$ unless otherwise indicated.
31 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.2 Includes cash, cash equivalents and equity securities of as of December 31, 2017. Total liquidity also includes undrawn $400m credit facility.
Strong Platform for Delivering Long Term Value
Diversified gold production480,000 – 520,000 oz from four North American mines
Expanding margins$950/oz AISC1 in 2018, declining
through 2020
Peer leading growthPortfolio of 6 low-cost development projects
Strong balance sheetDebt free, $235m cash2 & $635m total liquidity to support growth
Track record of delivering
shareholder value
4
2017 Year in Review – Record Performance
1 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.
• Met production guidance – third consecutive year• 10% production growth driving record performance• ~7% reduction in AISC1
• Strongest operating cash flow & mine-site FCF since 2015 merger• Strengthened operating base – Richmont acquisition completed late November
Record operational performance
• Delivered three feasibility studies outlining >400koz of high margin production growth• La Yaqui initial production early September ahead of schedule• Kirazlı site development underway
Advanced development pipeline
• Debt free having eliminated $315m of debt • Increased total liquidity to >$600m through expanded revolver on better terms• Attractive valuation opportunity
Improved financial flexibility
5
2015A 2016A 2017A 2018E
$1,091
$1,010
$940 $950
2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E
Growing Production, Declining Costs, Expanding Margins
Gold Production (000 oz)
AISC1,2,3 (US$/oz)
-6%
Cost of Sales1,4 (US$/oz)
1 2017E guidance excludes Island Gold Mine with the acquisition closing on November 23, 2017.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures. 3 Total consolidated all-in sustaining costs include corporate and administrative and share based compensation expenses. 4 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.5 AISC Margin calculated as realized gold price less AISC. For 2017E and 2018E this assumes a $1,250/oz gold price
+31%AISC Margin1,2,5 (US$/oz)
-3%
+28%
392
480-520
380
429
$1,241
$1,103$1,065 $1,075
2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E
$57
$229$322 $300
2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E
6
Canada57%Mexico
23%
Turkey20%
AĞI DAĞI (TURKEY) – Permitting3
Average Au Production 178kozMine-site AISC2 $411After-tax IRR +39%
KIRAZLI (TURKEY) – Permitting3
Average Au Production 104 kozMine-site AISC2 $373/ozAfter-tax IRR +44%
ÇAMYURT (TURKEY) – Permitting3
Average Au Production 93 koz
Mine-site AISC2 $645
After-tax IRR +253%
Top 10 North American Gold Producer
MULATOS (SONORA, MEXICO)
2018E Au Production 150-160 koz2018E Au Mine-site AISC US$900/oz
EL CHANATE (SONORA, MEXICO)
2018E Au Production 40-50 koz
2018E Au Mine-site AISC US$1,200/oz
YOUNG-DAVIDSON (ONTARIO, CANADA)
2018E Au Production 200-210 koz2018E Au Mine-site AISC US$850/oz
Producing Assets
Exploration / Development Assets
1 Source: Select street research2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Average annual production and mine-site AISC for Turkish projects and Lynn Lake are detailed in economic studies completed in 2017.Note: Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves. See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.
ISLAND GOLD (ONTARIO, CANADA)
2018E Au Production 90-100 koz2018E Au Mine-site AISC US$825/oz
QUARTZ MOUNTAIN (USA) – Adv. Exploration
Total Au M&I Resources 0.3 Moz (12.2mt @ 0.87 g/t)
Total Au Inf. Resources 1.1 Moz (39.2mt @0.91 g/t)
ESPERANZA (MEXICO) – Permitting
Total Au M&I Resources 1.1 Moz (34.4mt @ 0.98 g/t)
LYNN LAKE (CANADA) – Permitting3
Average Au Production 143 koz (Years 1-10)Mine-site AISC2 $745After-tax IRR +13%
Asset NPV by Geography1
Asset NPV by Stage1
Production72%
Development28%
Canada60%
Mexico40%
North American Production
7
Kirazlı
Ağı Dağı
Çamyurt
Lynn Lake
Permitting & Development
Young-Davidson
Stable Operating Base; Peer Leading Growth Profile
Island Gold
Mulatos
El Chanate
Mulatos District
Island Gold District
Esperanza
Quartz Mountain
>400 kozCombined annual production
growth potential
North American
Production
Exploration
Controlled, disciplined, multi-stage growth
44% After-tax IRR1
39% After-tax IRR1
253% After-tax IRR1
13% After-tax IRR1
~500 koz Stable, long-term production base;
declining cost profile
1 After-tax IRR for Turkish and Lynn Lake projects based on gold and silver prices of $1,250 and $16 per ounce, respectively. For more details, see press releases dated February 15 & 22, 2017 and December 14, 2017.
8
$315m High yield notes retired in April 2017
Strong Balance Sheet – Debt Free
1 Unaudited management estimate as of December 31, 2017.2 Cash, cash equivalents & equity securities as of December 31, 2017.3 Total liquidity includes cash, cash equivalents, equity securities and undrawn $400m credit facility for Alamos Gold as of December 31, 20174As of January 10, 2018
Balance Sheet
Cash & Cash Eq.1,2 US$235 million
Total Liquidity3 US$635 million
Total Debt US$0
Capital Structure
Shares Outstanding 389.1 million
Warrants 12.2 million
Employee Options 11.1 million
Fully Diluted 415.4 million
Recent Share Price (TSX)4 C$7.94
Market Capitalization ~C$3.1 billion
$24m Annual interest savings; $72m over remaining term
$235m
$400m$635m
As of December 31, 2017
Cash & Total Liquidity
Cash, cash equivalents & equity securitiesUndrawn Credit Facility
3
9
671%
8%
275%
-50%
450%
950%
1450%
1950%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Alamos Gold Share Price (TSX)S&P/TSX Global Gold IndexGold (US$/oz)
Track Record of Delivering Shareholder Value
1 Based on consensus analyst net asset value (NAV) estimates.2 Cumulative free cash flow (FCF) generated to date. Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.
15%Annualized return
since 2003
$118m Dividends paid to
date
Mulatos (US$m) Turkey (US$m)Young-Davidson (US$m) Lynn Lake (US$m)
Acquisition Cost (2003)
Acquisition Cost (2015)
Acquisition Cost (2010) & Capital Invested
Acquisition Cost (2016) & Capital Invested
Consensus NAV & Cumulative FCF
Consensus NAV Consensus NAV$20
$23
Consensus NAV & Cumulative FCF
Capital Invested Consensus NAV1 Cumulative FCF2Acquisition Cost
$10$427
$400$950
$1,159
$148$91
$504$71
10
Operations – Diversified North American Production
Long life reserve base
Declining costs & capital
Growing free cash flow
Growing production
11
Record Q4 & 2017 Performance
1 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.2 Total consolidated all-in sustaining costs include corporate and administrative and share based compensation expenses. For the purposes of calculating all-in sustaining costs at individual mine sites, the Company does not include corporate and administrative and share based compensation expenses.3 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures. 4 Includes capitalized exploration5 2017 guidance excludes revised capital budget for Turkish projects approved in April 2017
10%Production
growth from FY 2016
~7%Decrease in all-in sustaining costs3
from FY 2016
429 kozAchieved production guidance
with record performance
2016A Q3 YTD 2017 Q4 2017 2017A 2017E
Total gold production (k oz) 392 309 120 429 400-430
Gold sales (k oz) 389 303 127 430 -
Cost of sales (US$/oz, includes amortization)1 $1,103 $1,056 - - $1,065
All-in sustaining costs (US$/oz)2,3 $1,010 $946 - - $940
Capital Expenditures (US$M) $146.5 $123.3 - - $140-157
Average realized gold price (US$/oz) $1,239 $1,256 $1,275 $1,262
Operating revenues (US$M) $482.2 $381.1 $161.7 $542.8 -
Cash provided by operations before changes in WC (US$M)3 $148.0 $130.6 - - -
Mine-site free cash flow (US$M) 3 $35.4 $40.4
Net earnings (US$M) ($17.9) $31.3 - - -
Earnings per share (basic) ($0.07) $0.11 - - -
Cash, cash equivalents & equity securities (US$M)
$266 $168 ~$235 ~$235 -
Total debt (US$/M) $315 $0 $0 $0 -
Strongest earnings, cash flow &
mine-site free cash flow since since 2015 merger
12
La Yaqui Phase I
Q4 2017 Scorecard
La Yaqui initial production early September ahead of schedule
Kirazlı site development underway
Record Q4 production driven by record quarter from Young-Davidson
Young-Davidson MCM waste pass & pebble crusher completed
13
Young-Davidson – Flagship, Long-Life Production
2016A Q4/17A 2017A 2017E 2018EGold Production (k oz) 170.0 56.5 200.0 200-210 200-210Cost of Sales1 (US$/oz) $1,087 - - $1,050 $1,075Total Cash Costs2,3 (US$/oz) $657 - - $625 $675Mine-site AISC2,3 (US$/oz) $897 - - $775 $850Total Capital (US$m) $95 - - $70-80 $70-80Mine-site FCF2 (US$m) $4 - - - -
• One of Canada’s largest underground gold mines
• 15 year mine life based on YE 2016 mineral reserves
• Large resource base & exploration potential to support mine life extension
• Significant Canadian dollar exposure; ~95% of costs
Location: Ontario, Canada Stage: Producing
Ownership: 100% interest Operation: Underground
Gold Reserves & Resources4 Tonnes (000)
Grade (g/t Au)
oz Au (000)
P&P Underground Reserves 42,054 2.70 3,653
M&I Underground Resources 10,792 3.39 1,177
Inferred Underground Resources 3,524 2.76 313
1 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Excludes Net Realizable Value (“NRV”) inventory adjustments. See associated MD&A for a full reconciliation.4 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.
14
$1,162$1,087 $1,068 $1,075
2015A 2016A 2017 Q3YTD
2018E
$986$897 $824 $850
2015A 2016A 2017 Q3YTD
2018E2015A 2016A 2017A 2018E
-31%
Growing production; decliningcosts; declining capital intensity
Young-Davidson – Ramp up of Underground Mining
-14%+28%
~6,600 tpdAverage underground mining rate in 2017
-7%
6,000 tpdaverage underground mining rate in 2016
1 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.2 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization
Total Capital Spending (US$m)
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Q1/
13
Q2/
13
Q3/
13
Q4/
13
Q1/
14
Q2/
14
Q3/
14
Q4/
14
Q1/
15
Q2/
15
Q3/
15
Q4/
15
Q1/
16
Q2/
16
Q3/
16
Q4/
16
Q1/
17
Q2/
17
Q3/
17
Underground TPD Mill TPD Processed Grade (g/t Au)
Tonn
es p
er d
ay
g/t A
u
Mine-site AISC (US$/oz)Production (000 oz)
Cost of Sales2 (US$/oz)
160 170200 200-210
2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E
$108$95
$70-80 $70-80
15
Island Gold – High-Grade, Low Cost Production
Location: Ontario, Canada Stage: Producing
Ownership: 100% interest Operation: Underground
Gold Reserves & Resources5 Tonnes (000)
Grade (g/t Au)
oz Au (000)
P&P Underground Reserves 2,551 9.17 752
M&I Underground Resources 479 5.94 91
Inferred Underground Resources 3,042 10.18 996
Highly Productive Gold Mining District2016A Q4/17A 2017A 2017E 2018E
Gold Production (k oz)1 83.3 22.1 98.6 87-93 90-100
Cost of Sales2 (US$/oz) - - - - $1,175
Total Cash Costs3 (US$/oz) $587 - - $550-$590 $575Mine-site AISC3 (US$/oz) $745 - - $725-$765 $825Total Capital4 (US$m) $43 - - $40-$44 $50-55Mine-site FCF3 (US$m) ($2) - - - -
1 Operating results from Island Gold prior to its acquisition has been included for comparative purposes. Production attributable to Alamos totals 9,000 oz in 2017 following the closing of the Richmont Mines acquisition on Nov. 23, 2017. 2 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.3 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.4 Excludes exploration5 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.
• One of Canada’s highest grade & lowest cost gold mines
• PEA expansion to drive production higher & costs lower
• Significant upside potential reflecting inclusion of all mineral resources & ongoing exploration success
• Significant exploration potential laterally & at depth
0 50 100km
Marathon
Wawa
Hearst
Timmins
Iroquois Falls
Smooth Rock Falls
Eagle River, Wesdome
Borden, Goldcorp
Island Gold
Magino, Argonaut
Cote, IAMGOLD
Black Fox, McEwenTimmins West, Tahoe
Holloway, Kirkland Lake
Porcupine, Goldcorp
Bell Creek, Tahoe
Young-Davidson
Macassa, Kirkland Lake
Holt, Kirkland Lake
Lake Superior
ONTARIO
Hemlo, Barrick
144
101
17
17
11
101
Mine/ProjectCity
Dome Mine, Goldcorp
Hoyle Pond, Goldcorp
Cochrane
Pamour (PJV), Goldcorp
Taylor, Kirkland Lake
Detour Lake Mine, Detour Gold>25 Moz gold produced3
>35 Moz in defined reserves
16
90 94125
$735
$881
$550
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,00
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2017E 2018E 2019E - 2024E Average
Gold Production (k oz) AISC (US$/oz)
$550 $7
00
$713
$715
$720
$730
$735
$775
$782
$787 $8
70 $980
$985 $1
,050
$1,0
75
$1,1
13
$1,1
50
$1,2
00
Isla
nd G
old
PEA
2019
-202
4
Seab
ee
LaRo
nde
Mus
selw
hite
Mel
iadi
ne
Cana
dian
Mal
artic
Isla
nd G
old
Youn
g-D
avid
son
Lapa
Mac
assa
Red
Lake
Wes
twoo
d
Eleo
nore
Bell
Cree
k
Det
our L
ake
Eagl
e Ri
ver
Casa
Ber
ardi
Blac
k Fo
x
Island Gold – Growing Production, Declining Costs
2017E All-in Sustaining Costs (US$/oz)
Mineral Reserve Grade (g/t Au)
Source: Company filingsPlease refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.Note: AISC based on midpoint of 2017 guidance where available, otherwise 1H/17 metrics shown. Eagle River AISC shown is Wesdome consolidated. Bell Creek AISC shown consolidated with Timmins West. TMAC AISC excluded due to recent guidance revisions. Island Gold based on PEA.
+39%
PEA Expansion: Island Gold Operating Profile
20.8
14.6
9.2 9.2 8.8 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.3 6.4 6.14.6 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.2 3.6 2.7
1.1 1.0
Mac
assa
Bruc
ejac
k
Isla
nd G
old
Eagl
e Ri
ver
Wes
twoo
d
Seab
ee
Red
Lake
Hop
e Ba
y
Mel
iadi
ne
Mus
selw
hite
Eleo
nore
Lapa
LaRo
nde
Casa
Ber
ardi
Blac
k Fo
x
Bell
Cree
k
Tim
min
s Wes
t
Youn
g-D
avid
son
Cana
dian
Mal
artic
Det
our L
ake
39%expected production
growth
Significant upside potential >750 koz of Inferred resources not factored into
mine plan + ongoing exploration potential
-25%expected decrease in
LOM AISC
17
67
564
1,037 1,003
768
996
154
111
233 219
72
91
172
141
144 184
562
752
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Island Gold – Mineral Reserve & Resource Growth
Mineral Reserves and Resources Over Time (koz)
Mineral Reserve grade
ReservesM&I ResourcesInferred Resources +309%
Increase mineral reserves since 2014
Strong track record of mineral reserve & resource growth
~$35/ozLow 2016 discovery costs
+30%Increase in 2016 year end inferred
mineral resource; 20% increase in grade
+44%Mineral reserve grade increase since
2014
Gra
de (g
/t A
u)
oz A
u
1,2
1 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.2 Includes Proven & Probable reserves of 752,000 oz (2.6 mt at 9.17 g/t Au), Measured & Indicated resources of 91,000 oz (0.5 mt at 5.94 g/t Au) & Inferred resources of 996,000 oz (3.0 mt at 10.18 g/t Au)
18
Island Gold – Significant Exploration PotentialGold Metal Factor (Grade x True Width) - C & E1E Zones as of March 31, 2017
Significant exploration potential laterally& at depth
>750 k oz of Inferred mineral resources not included in PEA expansion plan
19
Island Gold – Ongoing Exploration SuccessGold Metal Factor (Grade x True Width) - C & E1E Zones as of January 10, 2018
Delineation drilling within C-Zone94.97 g/t Au over 3.83 m (840-529-24)62.85 g/t Au over 4.72 m (840-529-13)109.01 g/t Au over 2.55 m (840-524-23)14.82 g/t Au over 10.03 m (860-509-10)Exploration drilling13.32 g/t Au over 12.18 m (MH11, E1E Zone)10.58 g/t Au over 5.44 m (740-465-63, C Zone)23.71 g/t Au over 2.86 m (840-524-18, C Zone)25.92 g/t Au over 6.80 m (340-587-02, G6 Zone)22.28 g/t Au over 7.71 m (740-465-45, X Zone)
Grades & average thickness increasing at depth
Less than 15% of land package drilled
1 For further details, refer to press release dated Jan 11, 2018 “Alamos Reports Fourth Quarter 2017 Production and Provides 2018 Outlook”
New highlight intercepts since July 20171
20
Mulatos – Our Founding Operation
• Initial production 2005
• ~$400m of free cash flow1 generated to date
• Declining cost profile; 5% NSR royalty nearing completion
• Large underexplored land package (28,773 ha)
Location: Sonora, Mexico Stage: Producing
Ownership: 100% interest Operation: Open pit, heap leach & high grade mill
2016A Q4/17A 2017A 2017E 2018EGold Production (k oz) 154.0 42.7 160.0 150-160 150-160Cost of Sales1 (US$/oz) $1,088 - - $1,015 $950Total Cash Costs2 (US$/oz) $838 - - $815 $800Mine-site AISC2 (US$/oz) $916 - - $890 $900Total Capital3 (US$m) $33 - - $33-40 $26-30Mine-site FCF2,4 (US$m) $27 - - - -
Gold Reserves & Resources5 Tonnes (000)
Grade (g/t Au)
oz Au(000)
P&P Reserves 49,995 1.17 1,885M&I Resources 76,084 1.14 2,798Inferred Resources 10,280 0.98 325
1 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Capital spending guidance for 2017 and 2018 excludes capitalized exploration. 5 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.
21
La Yaqui & Cerro Pelon
Mulatos – District Exploration Potential
1 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.2 Includes Proven & Probable reserves of 608,000 oz (13.5 mt at 1.40 g/t Au), Measured & Indicated resources of 68,000 oz (1.1 mt at 1.91 g/t Au) & Inferred resources of 8,000 oz (0.2 mt at 1.39 g/t Au) for La Yaqui and Proven & Probable reserves of 170,000 oz (3.3 mt at 1.63 g/t Au), Measured & Indicated resources of 47,000 oz (0.6 mt at 2.56 g/t Au) & Inferred resources of 4,000 oz (0.1 mt at 1.23 g/t Au) for Cerro Pelon.
District potentialLarge underexplored land package; >70% of past drilling
focused near Mulatos mine
Mulatos District
Mulatos mine
220 259
778
47
115
236
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
2014 2015 2016
Oun
ces (
000
Au)
Proven & Probable Mineral Reserves
Inferred Mineral Resources
Measured & Indicated Mineral Resources
1,2
La Yaqui Phase I
La Yaqui Grande
778k oz Combined mineral reserves1,2 at La Yaqui & Cerro Pelon,
a 254% increase since 2014
22
El Chanate – Consistent Gold Producer
• $3m site free cash flow2 generated Q3 2017 YTD
• $1,270/oz minimum realized gold price in 2018 with production hedged5
• Significant free cash flow at end of mine life through residual leaching
Location: Sonora, Mexico Stage: Producing
Ownership: 100% interest Operation: Open pit, heap leach
Gold Reserves & Resources4 Tonnes (000)
Grade (g/t Au)
oz Au(000)
P&P Reserves – Open Pit 10,812 0.56 193P&P Reserves – Leach Pad Inventory - - 100M&I Resources 4,415 0.66 93
2016A Q4/17A 2017A 2017E 2018EGold Production (k oz) 68.0 12.1 60.4 50-60 40-50Cost of Sales1 (US$/oz) $1,177 - - $1,265 $1,270Total Cash Costs2,3 (US$/oz) $1,052 - - $1,200 $1,200Mine-site AISC2,3 (US$/oz) $1,069 - - $1,200 $1,200Total Capital (US$m) $1 - - $2 -Mine-site FCF2 (US$m) $5 - - - -
1 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Excludes Net Realizable Value (“NRV”) inventory adjustments. See associated MD&A for a full reconciliation.4 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.5 El Chanate’s 2017 and 2018 production has been hedged through gold collar contracts which ensure a minimum gold price of $1,270 per ounce and participation up to $1,444 per ounce in 2018.
23
Development – Peer Leading Growth Profile
Low cost, low capital intensity growth
Capacity to doublecurrent rate of production
6 development projects
24
Development: Kirazlı, Ağı Dağı & Çamyurt
Location: Turkey Stage: Development
Ownership: 100% interest Operation: Open pit, heap leach
• Kirazlı & Ağı Dağı EIAs approved
• Kirazlı Forestry Permits granted January 2017
• Kirazlı & Ağı Dağı feasibility studies completed February 20171 outlining 185% increase in combined after-tax NPV8%
• Tax incentives & mining law supportive of industry
Kirazlı2Tonnes Grade Contained Ounces(000) (g/t Au) (g/t Ag) (000 Au) (000 Ag)
Proven & Probable 26,104 0.79 12.01 665 10,078Measured & Indicated 5,966 0.43 2.18 82 418Inferred 5,689 0.59 8.96 108 1,638Ağı Dağı2
Proven & Probable 54,361 0.67 5.41 1,166 9,459Measured & Indicated 34,887 0.46 2.18 518 2,445Inferred 16,760 0.46 2.85 245 1,534Çamyurt2
Measured & Indicated 17,721 0.89 6.14 508 3,497Inferred 2,791 0.95 5.77 85 518
1 Please refer to press releases dated Feb 15 and Feb 22, 2017 regarding Kirazli & Agi Dagi feasibility studies & Camyurt preliminary economic assessment. The 185% increase is compared to the 2012 pre-feasibility study2 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix
25
Development: Kirazlı, Ağı Dağı & Çamyurt Economic Studies
Afte
r-ta
x N
PV8%
(US$
m)
$82m
$187m$88m
$298m
$86m
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
2012 2017
Kirazlı Ağı Dağı Çamyurt
+236%
1 Please refer to press releases dated Feb 15 and Feb 22, 2017 regarding Kirazli & Agi Dagi Feasibility studies & Camyurt PEA. After-tax NPV8% in 2012 prefeasibility study and after-tax NPV8% and IRR in 2017 feasibility studies and PEA assume gold and silver prices of $1,250 and $16 per ounce, respectively 2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures
11
2017 Positive Economic Studies1Kirazlı
Feasibility Study
Ağı Dağı Feasibility
Study
ÇamyurtPEA
Mine Life Years 5 6 4
Average Annual Productionoz Au 104,000 177,600 93,200
oz Ag 617,300 444,200 403,000
Average grade g/t Au 0.79 0.67 0.92
Mine-site AISC2 US$m $373 $411 $645
Initial Capex US$m $152 $250 $10
Total Capex US$m $180 $313 $26
After-tax NPV5% US$m $223 $360 $111
After-tax NPV8% US$m $187 $298 $86
After-tax IRR % 44% 39% 253%
Gold Price Assumption US$/oz $1,250 $1,250 $1,250
>39%After-tax IRR for each of Kirazlı, Ağı Dağı & Çamyurt1
Low cost, high return growth
26
Quartz Mountain Location: Oregon, United States
Ownership: Right to earn a 100% interest4
Stage: Advanced Exploration
Esperanza Location: Morelos State, Mexico
Ownership: 100% interest
Stage: Development
Operation: Open pit, heap leach
Development: Lynn Lake, Esperanza & Quartz Mountain
1 Lynn Lake December 2017 feasibility study based on gold and silver price assumptions of $1250 and $16 per ounce, respectively. See press release dated December 14, 2017 for more details.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Historic column recovery tests for gold at Quartz Mountain varied between 74% and 88% for the felsic rock hosted mineralization; see Orsa Ventures press release dated February 12, 20134 See mineral reserve and resource estimates and associated footnotes in appendix.5 Additional C$3m due on completion of feasibility study & C$15m or 2% NSR upon successful permitting
Lynn LakeLocation: Manitoba, Canada
Ownership: 100% interest
Stage: Permitting
Operation: Open pit
Tonnes Grade Oz Au
(000) (g/t Au) (g/t Ag) (000 Au) (000 Ag)
M&I Resources4 34,352 0.98 8.09 1,083 8,936
Inf. Resources 718 0.80 15.04 18 347
Tonnes Grade Oz Au
(000) (g/t Au) (000 Au)
M&I Resources4 12,156 0.87 339
Inferred Resources 39,205 0.91 1,147
• Excellent infrastructure; low technical risk
• Low capital intensity & operating costs
• Average annual production potential > 100k oz
• AISC expected to be lowest quartile2
• Located on northern extension of prolific Basin & Range Province of Nevada
• Low strip ratio, favourable metallurgy3
• Acquisition cost $3.5m5
• High grade, open pit with significant exploration potential
• Existing infrastructure in place
• Low cost hydroelectric power
• Feasibility study results announced Dec 20171
• Average production: 143 koz (Years 1-10)• LOM Mine-site AISC2: $745• After-tax NPV5%: $123m; IRR: 13%
Tonnes Grade Oz Au
(000) (g/t Au) (g/t Ag) (000 Au) (000 Ag)
P&P Reserves4 26,800 1.89 2.99 1,625 2,578M&I Resources4 6,815 1.49 4.77 327 667Inf. Resources 45,812 1.11 2.80 1,629 67
27
Alamos – Investment Case
Catalysts
Diversified intermediate gold producer Low-cost growth profile
Strong balance sheet to support growth
Long term track record of delivering shareholder value
Q1 2017: Received Forestry Permits for Kirazlı project
Q1 2017: Positive Kirazlı & Ağı Dağı feasibility studies & Çamyurt PEA
Q1 2017: 31% increase in combined mineral reserves
Q3 2017: Initial production at La Yaqui
Q4 2017: Closing of Richmont acquisition
Q4 2017: Met consolidated 2017 production guidance
2018: Ongoing exploration at Island Gold and Mulatos
2018: Receipt of GSM permit for Kirazlı
H2 2018: Completion of Phase I Expansion at Island Gold
28
Appendices
29
Board of Directors and Executive and Management Team
Board of Directors
Executive and Management Team
Paul J. Murphy John A. McCluskey Mark J. Daniel Patrick D.
Downey David Fleck David Gower Claire M. C. Kennedy Ronald E. Smith Kenneth Stowe
Chairman Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director
John A. McCluskey Jamie Porter Peter MacPhail Christine Barwell Chris Bostwick Luis Chavez
President and CEO Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer VP, Human Resources VP, Technical Services Senior VP, Mexico
Andrew Cormier Nils Engelstad Greg Fisher Aoife McGrath Scott Parsons Colin Webster
VP, Development & Construction VP, General Counsel VP, Finance VP, Exploration VP, Investor Relations VP Sustainability & External Affairs
30
Sustainability
• Our Objectives
• As we pursue further growth, we will continue to measure our success as an
organization by our performance in achievement of our sustainability objectives:
• Protecting the health and well-being of our employees
• Creating shared value with our host communities and countries
• Ensuring that our operations are net-positive for the environment
• Over the years, Alamos has been recognized for its achievements in these areas:
Clean Industry Certification from PROFEPA• Alamos was certified as an Industria Limpia (clean industry) in recognition of the excellence of environmental management at Mulatos
CSR Award from Mexican Center for Philanthropy (CEMEFI)• Signifies exceptional record of CSR performance; • 2016 marked the 8th consecutive year for Alamos
31
2018 Guidance – Alamos
2018 Guidance 2017 GuidanceYoung-
Davidson Island Gold Mulatos El Chanate Total Total
Gold production (000’s ounces) 200-210 90-100 150-160 40-50 480-520 429 (actual)Cost of Sales (in millions) (4) $220 $112 $147 $57 $536 $442Cost of Sales ($ per ounce) (4) $1,075 $1,175 $950 $1,270 $1,075 $1,065Total cash costs ($ per ounce) (1) $675 $575 $800 $1,200 $740 $765All-in sustaining costs ($ per ounce) (1) $950 $940Mine-site all-in sustaining costs ($ per ounce) (1),(3) $850 $825 $900 $1,200 - -Capital expenditures (in millions)Sustaining capital(1) $35-40 $25-27 $8-10 - $68-77 $40-47Growth capital(1) $35-40 $25-28(2) $18-20 (2) - $78-88 $65-75Total capital(1) $70-80 $50-55 $26-30 - $146-165 $105-122
Corporate & Administrative (in millions) $18 $16
1. Refer to the “Cautionary non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures” disclosure.2. Excludes capitalized exploration.3. For the purposes of calculating mine-site all-in sustaining costs at individual mine sites, the Company does not include an allocation of corporate and administrative and share based compensation expenses to the mine sites.4. Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties, and amortization expense
2018 Guidance 2017 GuidanceSustaining Capital Growth Capital Total Total
Development Projects (in millions)Turkey - $100 $100 $4Lynn Lake - $8 $8 $9La Yaqui Grande & Cerro Pelon - $13 $13 -Esperanza & Quartz Mountain - $2 $2 $3Total – Development Projects - $123 $123 $16
Capitalized Exploration (in millions)Island Gold - $12 $12 -Mulatos - $7 $7 $15Lynn Lake - $4 $4 $4Total – Capitalized Exploration - $23 $23 $19
Total Consolidated Budget $68-77 $224-234 $292-311 $140-157
32
Young-Davidson – Increasing Grade & Productivity
1 Cost of sales includes mining and processing costs, royalties and amortization.2 Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.3 Excludes Net Realizable Value (“NRV”) inventory adjustments. See associated MD&A for a full reconciliation.4 Excludes hydro rebate not attributable to Q4/15
Underground ramp up driving production higher and unit costs lower
Q1/14 Q2/14 Q3/14 Q4/14 Q1/15 Q2/15 Q3/15 Q4/15 Q1/16 Q2/16 Q3/16 Q4/16 Q1/17 Q2/17 Q3/17 Q4/17
Gold ounces produced 35,104 40,166 40,538 40,945 38,098 39,365 38,201 44,694 39,065 42,644 43,629 44,662 40,400 47,300 55,800 56,500
Cost of sales1 (US$/oz) $1,677 $1,625 $1,370 $1,211 $1,216 $1,298 $1,165 $986 $1,058 $1,182 $1,032 $1,077 $1,148 $1,113 $966 -
Total cash costs per oz. (2,3) $1,009 $871 $723 $719 $745 $697 $681 $617 $616 $738 $607 $667 $710 $677 $572 -
Mine-site AISC per oz.(2,3) $1,315 $1,144 $959 $912 $987 $1,008 $979 $980 $846 $965 $849 $926 $851 $895 $ 744 -
Underground mine
Tonnes mined per day 2,611 3,595 3,753 4,140 4,130 5,149 5,081 5,911 5,776 6,123 5,467 6,675 6,400 6,377 6,544
Grades (g/t) 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.9 -
Development metres 3,772 3,545 3,269 3,438 3,409 3,789 3,619 3,769 3,490 3,168 2,677 3,044 3,242 3,425 3,344 -
Unit UG mining costs (US$) $46 $45 $41 $39 $39 $33 $32 $294 $31 $34 $34 $32 $36 $33 $34 -
Unit UG mining costs (CAD$) $51 $49 $45 $44 $48 $41 $41 $384 $42 $44 $45 $42 $47 $44 $43 -
Mill processing facility
Tonnes processed per day 7,163 8,230 7,670 7,757 7,186 7,677 7,680 7,630 7,342 7,006 6,833 7,552 7,718 6,917 7,553
Grades (inc. OP stockpile) 1.8 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.7 -
Recoveries (%) 87% 88% 90% 88% 86% 88% 92% 91% 90% 92% 93% 90% 89% 92% 93% -
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Q1/14 Q2/14 Q3/14 Q4/14 Q1/15 Q2/15 Q3/15 Q4/15 Q1/16 Q2/16 Q3/16 Q4/16 Q1/17 Q2/17 Q3/17
Underground tonnes mined per day Unit UG mining costs (US$/t)
Und
ergr
ound
TPD
Uni
t UG
min
ing
cost
s (U
S$/t
)
33
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Commissioning of MCM shaft
Transition to 100% owner development
Ramp up to 7,000 tpd
Raise boring of lower NG shaft
Completion of MCM waste pass
• Shaft bottom infrastructure
• Northgate shaft –changeover to shaft bottom
• Northgate shaft hoisting from 8900L
Young-Davidson – Development Schedule
Please refer to Cautionary Notes on non-GAAP Measures and Additional GAAP Measures.
Declining capital intensity
34
Young-Davidson – Long Section
Declining capital intensity
Higher underground mining rates – stronger production
Strong free cash flow growth
Development of lower mine infrastructure to support:
Productivity improvements –lower costs
35
Island Gold – 2017 Drilling Program
Significant Exploration Potential at Depth and to the East
36
Island Gold – Regional Exploration
37
Mulatos District
38
Kirazlı, Ağı Dağı & Çamyurt Economic Studies – 2017Feasibility Study - 2017 Preliminary Economic Assessment - 2017
Kirazlı Ağı Dağı ÇamyurtProduction Mine life (years) 5 6 4
Total gold production (ounces) 540,000 937,300 373,200Total silver production (ounces) 3,141,000 2,365,200 1,612,600
Average annual production (ounces)1
Gold 104,000 177,600 93,200Silver 617,300 444,200 403,000
Total ore mined (tonnes) 26,100,000 54,361,000 16,580,000Total waste mined (tonnes) 37,900,000 55,893,000 30,874,000Total material mined (tonnes) 64,000,000 110,254,000 47,454,000
Waste-to-ore ratio2 1.45 1.03 1.86
Average grade (grams per tonne)Gold 0.79 0.67 0.92Silver 12.0 5.4 6.3
Recovery (%)Gold 81% 80% 76%Silver 31% 25% 48%
Average throughput (tpd) 15,000 30,000 15,000
Operating CostsTotal cost per tonne of ore3 $8.49 $6.46 $14.03
Total cash cost (per ounce sold)4 $339 $374 $604Mine-site all-in sustaining cost (per ounce sold)4 $373 $411 $645
Capital Costs (millions)Pre-production capital expenditure $151.9 $250.3 $10.2Sustaining capital expenditure $18.1 $33.9 $9.4Reclamation costs (net of salvage value) $9.9 $28.8 $5.9
Total capital expenditure $179.8 $312.9 $25.5
Economic Analysis IRR (after-tax) 44.3% 38.7% 253.0%
NPV @ 0% discount rate (after-tax, millions) $299.3 $492.8 $173.8NPV @ 5% discount rate (after-tax millions) $222.9 $360.2 $111.4NPV @ 8% discount rate (after-tax, millions) $186.5 $297.6 $86.2
Gold price assumption (average, per ounce sold) $1,250 $1,250 $1,250Silver price assumption (average, per ounce sold) $16.00 $16.00 $16.00Exchange Rate (Turkish Lira/US Dollar) 2.90:1 2.90:1 2.90:1
1 Average annual production is based on five full years of production for Kirazlı and Ağı Dağı and excludes pre-commercial production2 Reported waste-to-ore ratio is over the life of mine. The waste-to-ore ratio during commercial production is 0.70:1 for Ağı Dağı and 1.19:1 for Kirazlı in the 2017 feasibility study3 Total unit cost per tonne of ore excludes silver as a by-product credit 4 Total cash costs and mine-site all-in sustaining costs include silver as a by-product credit
39
Lynn Lake Feasibility Study – 2017Feasibility Study Highlights - December 2017Production Mine life (years) 10.4
Total gold production (000 ounces) 1,495Total silver production (000 ounces) 1,263
Average annual gold production1
Years 1 to 6 (000 ounces) 170Years 1 to 10 (000 ounces) 143
Total ore mined (000 tonnes) 26,803Total waste mined (000 tonnes) 195,188Total material mined (000 tonnes) 221,991
Waste-to-ore ratio2 7.28
Average grade (grams per tonne)Gold 1.89Silver 2.99
Recovery (%)Gold (Average MacLellan and Gordon) 92%Silver (MacLellan only) 49%
Average mill throughput (tonnes per day (“tpd”)) 7,000
Operating CostsTotal cost per tonne of ore3 $36.06
Total cash cost (per ounce sold)4 $645 Mine-site all-in sustaining cost (per ounce sold)4 $745
Capital Costs (millions)Pre-production capital expenditure $338.0Sustaining capital expenditure $126.6Reclamation costs $21.1
Total capital expenditure $485.6
Base Case Economic Analysis IRR (after-tax) 12.5%
NPV @ 0% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $279.0 NPV @ 5% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $123.4
Gold price assumption (average, per ounce sold) $1,250Silver price assumption (average, per ounce sold) $16.00Exchange Rate (US Dollar/Canadian Dollar) 0.751. Average annual production excludes pre-commercial production2. Reported waste-to-ore ratio is over the life of mine and includes overburden as waste. The waste-to-ore ratio during commercial production is 7.06:1 3. Total unit cost per tonne (“t”) of ore includes royalties and silver as a by-product credit4. Total cash costs and mine-site all-in sustaining costs include royalties and silver as a by-product credit
40
2016 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
PROVEN AND PROBABLE GOLD RESERVES (as at December 31, 2016)Proven Reserves Probable Reserves Total Proven and Probable
Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Au) (000's) (000's) (g/t Au) (000's) (000's) (g/t Au) (000's)
Young-Davidson - Surface 1,165 0.91 34 0 0.00 0 1,165 0.91 34Young-Davidson - Underground 14,851 2.80 1,336 27,203 2.65 2,317 42,054 2.70 3,653Total Young-Davidson 16,016 2.66 1,370 27,203 2.65 2,317 43,220 2.65 3,687Island Gold 573 8.68 160 1,978 9.31 592 2,551 9.17 752Mulatos Main Pits 4,173 1.02 137 21,847 0.87 613 26,020 0.90 750San Carlos Underground 72 13.06 30 34 8.64 9 106 11.65 40Stockpiles 7,129 1.38 317 0 0.00 0 7,129 1.38 317La Yaqui 470 1.48 22 1,469 1.37 65 1,939 1.40 87La Yaqui Grande 0 0.00 0 11,548 1.40 521 11,548 1.40 521Cerro Pelon 960 1.70 53 2,293 1.59 117 3,253 1.63 170Total Mulatos 12,804 1.36 559 37,191 1.11 1,325 49,995 1.17 1,885El Chanate - Open Pit 7,008 0.51 114 3,804 0.65 79 10,812 0.56 193El Chanate - Leach Pad Inv. 100 100Total El Chanate 7,008 0.95 214 3,804 0.65 79 10,812 0.84 293MacLellan 9,550 1.91 586 8,530 1.32 361 18,080 1.63 947Gordon 2,310 2.82 210 6,410 2.27 468 8,720 2.42 678Total Lynn Lake 11,860 2.09 796 14,940 1.73 829 26,800 1.89 1,625Agi Dagi 1,450 0.76 36 52,911 0.66 1,130 54,361 0.67 1,166Kirazli 700 1.25 28 25,404 0.78 637 26,104 0.79 665Total Turkey 2,150 0.93 64 78,315 0.70 1,767 80,465 0.71 1,831Alamos - Total 50,412 1.95 3,163 163,431 1.32 6,910 213,843 1.47 10,073
PROVEN AND PROBABLE SILVER MINERAL RESERVES (as at December 31, 2016)Proven Reserves Probable Reserves Total Proven and Probable
Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Ag) (000's) (000's) (g/t Ag) (000's) (000's) (g/t Ag) (000's)
La Yaqui 470 7.40 112 1,469 7.19 340 1,939 7.25 452La Yaqui Grande 0 0.00 0 11,548 19.94 7,403 11,548 19.94 7,403MacLellan (Lynn Lake) 9,550 5.01 1,539 8,530 3.79 1,039 18,080 4.43 2,578Ağı Dağı 1,450 6.22 290 52,911 5.39 9,169 54,361 5.41 9,459Kirazli 700 15.90 358 25,404 11.90 9,720 26,104 12.01 10,078Alamos - Total 12,170 5.88 2,299 99,862 8.62 27,671 112,032 8.32 29,970
41
2016 Total Measured and Indicated Mineral ResourcesMEASURED AND INDICATED GOLD MINERAL RESOURCES (as at December 31, 2016)
Measured Resources Indicated Resources Total Measured and IndicatedTonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Au) (000's) (000's) (g/t Au) (000's) (000's) (g/t Au) (000's)
Young-Davidson - Surface 496 1.13 18 1,242 1.28 51 1,739 1.24 69Young-Davidson - Underground 5,876 3.33 629 4,916 3.47 548 10,792 3.39 1,177Total Young-Davidson 6,373 3.16 647 6,158 3.03 599 12,531 3.09 1,246Island Gold 34 4.94 5 446 6.01 86 479 5.94 91Mulatos 8,270 1.24 330 64,221 1.08 2,224 72,491 1.10 2,554San Carlos UG 196 6.11 39 362 4.70 55 558 5.20 93La Yaqui 0 - 0 1,108 1.91 68 1,108 1.91 68Cerro Pelon 117 2.75 10 455 2.52 37 572 2.56 47Carricito 58 0.82 2 1,297 0.82 34 1,355 0.83 36Total Mulatos 8,641 1.37 381 67,443 1.12 2,418 76,084 1.14 2,798El Chanate 1,092 0.55 19 3,323 0.69 74 4,415 0.66 93MacLellan 2,110 1.86 126 2,240 1.24 89 4,350 1.57 215Gordon 10 1.72 0 450 1.96 28 460 1.96 29Burnt Timber 0 - 0 1,021 1.40 46 1,021 1.40 46Linkwood 0 - 0 984 1.16 37 984 1.17 37Total Lynn Lake 2,120 1.86 126 4,695 1.32 200 6,815 1.49 327Esperanza 19,226 1.01 622 15,126 0.95 462 34,352 0.98 1,083Ağı Dağı 553 0.44 8 34,334 0.46 510 34,887 0.46 518Kirazli 118 0.50 2 5,848 0.43 80 5,966 0.43 82Çamyurt 513 1.00 16 17,208 0.89 492 17,721 0.89 508Total Turkey 1,184 0.68 26 57,390 0.59 1,082 58,574 0.59 1,108Quartz Mountain 214 0.95 7 11,942 0.87 333 12,156 0.87 339Alamos - Total 38,883 1.47 1,833 166,523 0.98 5,253 205,406 1.07 7,087
MEASURED AND INDICATED SILVER MINERAL RESOURCES (as at December 31, 2016)Measured Resources Indicated Resources Total Measured and Indicated
Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Ag) (000's) (000's) (g/t Ag) (000's) (000's) (g/t Ag) (000's)
La Yaqui Grande 0 0.00 0 1,108 15 523 1,108 15 523Esperanza 19,226 7.25 4,482 15,126 9.16 4,455 34,352 8.09 8,936MacLellan (Lynn Lake) 2,110 5.34 362 2,240 4.24 305 4,350 4.77 667Ağı Dağı 553 1.59 28 34,334 2.19 2,417 34,887 2.18 2,445Kirazli 118 2.73 10 5,848 2.17 408 5,966 2.18 418Çamyurt 513 5.63 93 17,208 6.15 3,404 17,721 6.14 3,497Alamos - Total 22,520 6.87 4,975 75,864 4.72 11,512 98,384 5.21 16,486
42
2016 Total Inferred Mineral Resources
INFERRED GOLD MINERAL RESOURCES (as at December 31, 2016)Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Au) (000's)
Young-Davidson - Surface 31 0.99 1Young-Davidson - Underground 3,524 2.76 313Total Young-Davidson 3,555 2.75 314Island Gold 3,042 10.18 996Mulatos 8,935 0.92 265San Carlos UG 162 4.93 26La Yaqui 174 1.39 8Cerro Pelon 109 1.23 4Carricito 900 0.74 22Total Mulatos 10,280 0.98 325El Chanate 112 0.71 3MacLellan 750 1.62 39Gordon 620 1.30 26Burnt Timber 23,438 1.04 781Linkwood 21,004 1.16 783Total Lynn Lake 45,812 1.11 1,629Esperanza 718 0.80 18Ağı Dağı 16,760 0.46 245Kirazli 5,689 0.59 108Çamyurt 2,791 0.95 85Total Turkey 25,240 0.54 438Quartz Mountain 39,205 0.91 1,147Alamos - Total 127,965 1.18 4,869
INFERRED SILVER MINERAL RESOURCES (as at December 31, 2016)Tonnes Grade Ounces(000's) (g/t Ag) (000's)
La Yaqui Grande 174 5.55 31Esperanza 718 15.04 347MacLellan 750 2.80 67Ağı Dağı 16,760 2.85 1,534Kirazli 5,689 8.96 1,638Çamyurt 2,791 5.77 518Alamos - Total 26,882 4.78 4,135
43
Notes to Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates
Mineral ResourcesJeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM Director - Reserves and Resource, Alamos Gold Inc. Young-Davidson, El Chanate, San Carlos U/G, Lynn Lake
Marc Jutras, P.Eng Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc. Mulatos Pits, Cerro Pelon, La Yaqui, Carricito, Esperanza, Ağı Dağı, Kirazlı, Çamyurt, Quartz Mountain
Raynald Vincent P.Eng. M.P.M. Chief Geologist, Island Gold Island Gold
Mineral ReservesChris Bostwick, FAusIMM VP Technical Services, Alamos Gold Inc. Young-Davidson, El Chanate, San Carlos Underground, Lynn Lake
Herb Welhener, SME-QP VP, Independent Mining Consultants Inc. Mulatos Pits, Cerro Pelon, La Yaqui, Ağı Dağı, KirazlıLéon Grondin Leblanc, P.Eng. Chief Engineer, Island Gold Island Gold
Resources ReservesGold Price Cutoff Gold Price Cutoff Met Recovery
Mulatos:Mulatos Main Open Pit $1,400 0.5 $1,250 see notes >50%San Carlos Underground $1,400 2.5 $1,250 3.27 70%Cerro Pelon $1,400 0.5 $1,250 see notes 75%La Yaqui $1,400 0.5 $1,250 see notes 75%Carricito $1,400 0.3 n/a n/a >50%
Young-Davidson - Surface $1,400 0.5 $1,250 0.5 91%Young-Davidson - Underground $1,400 1.3 $1,250 1.9 91%Island Gold CAD $1,500 4.5 CAD 1,500 4.0-4.3 96.5%El Chanate $1,400 0.15 $1,250 0.15 30-65%Lynn Lake (MacLellan) $1,400 0.42 $1,250 0.47 91-92%Lynn Lake (Gordon) $1400 0.62 $1,200 0.69 89-94% Lynn Lake (Burnt Timber and Linkwood) $1,555 0.4 n/a n/a 89-92%Esperanza $1,400 0.4 n/a n/a 60-72%Ağı Dağı $1,400 0.2 $1,250 see notes 80%Kirazlı $1,400 0.2 $1,250 see notes 81%Çamyurt $1,400 0.2 n/a n/a 78%Quartz Mountain $1,400 0.21 Oxide, 0.6 Sulfide n/a n/a 65-80%
Qualified Persons:
Chris Bostwick, FAusIMM, Alamos Gold’s Vice President, Technical Services, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation. Chris Bostwick is a Qualified Person within the meaning of Canadian Securities Administrator’s National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). The Qualified Persons for the National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral reserve and resource estimates are detailed in the following table.
Notes to Mineral Reserve and Resource Tables:
• The Company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resource as at December 31, 2016 are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining Metallurgy and Petroleum’s “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definition and Guidelines” as per Canadian Securities Administrator’s NI 43-101 requirements.
• Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.• Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.• Mineral Reserve cut-off grade for the Mulatos Mine, the Cerro Pelon Pit, the La Yaqui Pit, the Kirazlı Pit and the Ağı Dağı Pit are determined as a net of process value of $0.10 per tonne for each model
block• All Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources are pit constrained with the exception of those outside the Mulatos Main Pits on the Mulatos property which have no economic restrictions and
are tabulated by gold cut-off grade.