AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief -...

download AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

of 6

Transcript of AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief -...

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    1/6

    Case No. 1120465

    IN THE SUPBEME COURT OF ALABAMA

    HUGH MCINNISH, et a l . ,

    Appellants,

    V .

    BETH CHAPMAN, in her capacity as Secretaary of State,

    ON APPEAL FRCI THE CIRCUIT COURT OF M0NT6CiERY COUNTY,

    ALABAMA

    CV 2013-1053

    OPTIONAL MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE AMJOIS BRIEF

    Comes now W. Spencer Connerat, III, e l e c t o r of the

    S t a t e of F l o r i d a and n a t u r a l born C i t i z e n of the United

    S t a t e s of America, pursuant to A l a . R. App. P. 29, w i t h h i s

    OPTIONAL MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF, which a l s o

    doubles as movant's Brief as Amicus Cnrxae Supporting

    i^>pellants to be f i l e d upon such motion being granted, A

    n a t i v e of Savannah, Georgia, movant f e e l s a k i n s h i p w i t h

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    2/6

    the good people of Alabama, as both lo c al e s were oppressed

    b y E n g l i s h r u l e , as pa rt of the Geo rgi a Colony. I f Alabama

    Law i s not fol lo we d i n t h i s c a se , i t i s movant's h e a r t f e l t

    c o n v i c t i o n t h a t t y r a n n i c a l r u l e manif ested by an unl awf ul

    and pu ta ti ve Pre sid ent of the Uni ted Sta tes w i l l c o n t i n u e ,

    making a mockery of the cou rts and a ls o of the Je f fe r so n ia n

    notion of the r i g h t t o l i f e , l i b e r t y and the p ur su it of

    happyness.

    With a l l due res pec t, and i n the humble opinion of

    t h i s movant, the qu es ti on bef ore the cour t i n the above-

    s t y l e d case i s c l e a r . Must a s t a t e C o n s t i t u t i o n a l o f f i c e r

    set a s i d e p a r t y , pomp, and procedure i n ord er to do the

    r i g h t t h i n g , i n accordance with her Oath? The answer i s

    r e s o u n d i n g l y a f f i r m a t i v e .

    The attached c e r t i f i e d copy of a T a c it Admiss ion of

    I n e l i g i b i l i t y (Confession in Open Court) i s the crux of the

    matter, of t h i s b r i e f of an Amicus Curiae who seeks t o be a

    f r i e n d t o a l l C o u r t s , b ut e s p e c i a l l y to the Alabama Supreme

    Court. A c e r t i f i e d copy of t h i s l a w f u l l y procured Notice

    was duly f i l e d i n a cour t of competent j u r i s d i c t i o n i n

    P i n e l l a s County, F l o r i d a [Connerat v. Obama, 2009, Pinellas

    County Court, UCN # 522009SC005522XXSCSC], f i l e d July 1,

    2009 and dism isse d without p re ju di ce on A p r i l 7, 2010.

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    3/6

    Another c e r t i f i e d copy of such Tacit Admission of

    I n e l i g i b i l i t y was duly f i l e d i n a court of competent

    j u r i s d i c t i o n on December 6, 2012 as a P e t i t i o n f or

    E x t r a o r d i n a r y Emergency Writ of Mandamus [Connerat v.

    Detzner, 2012, Florida Supreme Court, SC12-2516],

    t r a n s f e r r e d on March 27, 2013 to the Second J u d i c a l

    C i r c u i t , i n and f or Leon County, F l o r i d a , pursuant to

    Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1999) which i s

    o f t e n c i t e d i n order to dele gate cases i n which the Supreme

    Court of F l o r i d a be li ev es that disc over y or other lengthy

    processes may be needed to as ce rt ai n the v e r i t a b i l i t y of a

    d i s p u t e d or otherwise u ns et tl ed questi on of f a c t . That

    c e r t i f i e d copy of the Ta cit Admission of I n e l i g i b i l i t y

    (Confession in Open Court) i s c u r r e n t l y before a judge i n

    Leon County, as pa rt of an ac tion f o r a Writ of Mandamus

    [Connerat v. Detzner, filed 4/4/2013 upon transfer order

    from the Florida Supreme Court, new case number 37 2013 CA

    001020] yet there has been no r u l i n g , as of t h i s date. The

    unadjudicated nature of t h i s claim c l e a r s the way f o r the

    Alabama Supreme Court to r u l e with providence, deeming such

    Admission of I n e l i g i b i l i t y as f a c t .

    Notwithstanding a p o t e n t i a l d i s p o s i t i o n of the F l o r i d a

    case, time i s of the essence i n THIS matter, concerning,

    among other th in gs , the prospec t of an ostensibly unlawful

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    4/6

    usurpation of the Executive Branch of the government of the

    UnitedStates of America. Movant hereby provides f o r t h w i t h ,

    a c e r t i f i e d copy of such t e r r i b l y damning documentary

    evidence, l a w f u l l y c e r t i f i e d by a Deputy Clerk, in P i n e l l a s

    County, F l o r i d a , on A p r i l 4, 2013, a date which may invoke

    the remembrance of the t r a g i c day when one of Alabama's

    g r e a t e s t men. Dr. Martin Luther Ki ng , J r . , was shot and

    k i l l e d . He knew that the purety of Law would u l t i m a t e l y

    trump the f o r c e f u l t a c t i c s of man, and h i s w i l l to power.

    The person named i n the attac hed document has admitted

    i n e l i g i b i l i t y to high o f f i c e . Such prima facie documentary

    evidence i s s u f f i c i e n t for any competent, l o g i c a l , and

    r a t i o n a l C i t i z e n to decl ar e th at such conf essor i s not

    P r e s i d e n t of the Unit ed Stat es , ne it he r i n Alabama, nor

    F l o r i d a , nor even i n the D i s t r i c t of Columbia. May a l l

    f u t u r e Se cr et ar ie s of Stat e, Governors, Congressmen,

    Attorneys Gene ral, and oth ers i n the p u bl i c eye never be

    f o o l e d again, nor forsake any solemn Oath to pr ot ec t our

    C o n s t i t u t i o n for the Uni ted Stat es of America.

    Signed A p r i l 10, 2013, i n B e l l e a i r , F l o r i d a , U.S.A.

    W. Spencer Connerat, 111, pr o se336 C a r l Ave.

    B e l l e a i r , FL 33756

    (727) 512-2571

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    5/6

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby c e r t i f y that on the 10^ day of A p r i l , 2013,

    anno Domini, I mailed the foregoing to the Clerk of the

    Supreme Court, i n Montgomery, v i a the United States P o s t a lS e r v i c e , C e r t i f i e d M a i l , and mailed a copy to a l l counsel

    i n t h i s matter as f o l l o w s :

    L. Dean Johnson

    L. Dean Johnson, P.C.

    4030 Balmoral Dr., Suite B

    H u n t s v i l l e , AL 35801

    L a r r y Klayman

    Klayman Law Firm

    2020 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

    S u i t e 800Washington, DC 20006

    Hon. Luther Strange

    Margaret L. Fleming

    James W, Davis

    Laura E. Howell

    Attorney General of Alabama

    501 Washington St.

    Montgomery, AL 36130

    W. Spencer Connerat, 111, pro se336 C a r l Ave.B e l l e a i r , FL 33756

    (727) 512-2571

  • 7/28/2019 AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERAT

    6/6

    i

    TACIT ADMISSION OF INELIGIBILITYCONFESSION IN OPEN COURT

    WHEREAS Defendant BarackHussein Obama n received a

    Certified Letter ofRedress dated 2/26/2009fromPlaintiff

    William Spencer Connerat III, on 3/25/2009, and numbered

    7008 1830 0000 2749 6597 by United States Postal Service: /\ o