Monitoring andReporting Plans

aka “PAEP” (Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan)

Acronyms

PAEP = Project Assessment and Evaluation PlanPMPP = Project Monitoring and Performance PlanSAP = Sampling and Analysis PlanQAPP = Quality Assurance Project Plan

Steps in a Project

Request for

Proposals

(RFP)

Grant Propo

sal

Grant Awar

dCONTRAC

T or GRANT

AGREEME

PLANNING

Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan (PAEP, a.k.a

PMPP, PMAP)

Environmental Monitoring Plan

Quality Assurance

Project Plan

(QAPP)

Construction Design

Permits

Outreach Plan

PRE-implementation Effectiveness Monitoring or

Surveys

IMPLEMENTATION

POST-implementation Effectiveness Monitoring or

Surveys

REPORTING

Construction,Restoration,

Re-vegetation, Public education campaign, etc.

Scope of Work

Schedule

Budget

Conceptual Scope of Work

PAEP

Monitoring Plan

QAPP

PLANNING

REPORTINGINTRO

TEXT

PAEP - March 2004 MemoCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board

San Francisco Bay Region

1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400, Oakland, California 94612 (510) 622-2300 Fax (510) 622-2460

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb2

Preserving, enhancing, and restoring the San Francisco Bay Area’s waters for over 50 years

Recycled Paper

Terry Tamminen Secretary for

Environmental Protection

Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor

TO: Proposition 13 Grant Recipient Project Directors and Regional Water Quality Control Board Contract Managers

FROM: Carrie Austin, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board On Behalf of the Statewide Grants Work Group

DATE: FINAL – Revised March 2004 – version 1.3

SUBJECT: MONITORING AND REPORTING ON PROJECTS FUNDED BY THE COSTA-MACHADO WATER ACT OF 2000 (PROPOSITION 13)

NOTE: This document will not be revised again. SWRCB DFA staff is preparing comprehensive instructions (contact: Steven Rodriguez, 916/324-9944 or rodrs@dwq.swrcb.ca.gov )

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1

A. Purpose 1 B. Regulatory Requirements 1 C. Project Variability 1 D. Contents and audience 1

II. PROJECT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION PLAN CONTENTS 2 A. Background and Beneficial Uses 2 B. Problem 2

1. Nonpoint Sources of Pollution 2 2. Baseline Water Quality 2

C. Proposed Solution 3 D. Effectiveness Evaluation 4 E. Watershed Program Requirements 4 F. Outline of Draft and Final Project Report 4

ATTACHMENTS A. Regulatory Requirements – Proposition 13 B. Monitoring Requirements – Request for Proposal 1. Prop 13 Phase 1 – Grants Awarded May 2001 2. Prop 13 Phase 2 – Grants Awarded November 2002 3. Prop 13 Phase 3 – Grants Awarded 2004

Memo TOC Section II(NPS Project)

Project Background & BUs

Problem– NPSources of Pollution– Baseline Water Quality

Proposed Solution (the Project)Effectiveness EvaluationOutline of Draft and Final Project Report

Memo Attachment A

ATTACHMENT AMONITORING AND REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS COSTA-MACHADO WATER ACT OF

2000 (Proposition 13)

Memo Attachment B

ATTACHMENT B.1REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS –MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

PROP 13 PHASE 1 – GRANTS AWARDED MAY 2001

Memo Attachment C

ATTACHMENT CEXAMPLE PLAN

PAEP

Monitoring Plan

QAPP

PLANNING

REPORTINGINTRO

TEXT

Reporting –Coastal & Nonpoint Source

Final report includes:effectiveness of BMPs or NPS MMs in preventing or reducing nonpoint source pollutionFor which we need quality data

The End