Ajju Project[1]

132
A PROJECT REPORT ON TO ACCESS THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION OF HLL PRODUCTS & SERVICE ISSUES IN BHOPAL CITY SUBMITTED BY: MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA M.B.A. (Full Time) III SEMESTER MAHARISHI CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE MAHARISHI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

Transcript of Ajju Project[1]

Page 1: Ajju Project[1]

A PROJECT REPORT

ON

TO ACCESS THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION

OF HLL PRODUCTS

&

SERVICE ISSUES IN BHOPAL CITY

SUBMITTED BY:

MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

M.B.A. (Full Time) III SEMESTER

MAHARISHI CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE

MAHARISHI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

BARKATULLAH UNIVERSITY, BHOPAL SESSION (2004 – 2006)

Page 2: Ajju Project[1]

A PROJECT REPORT

ON

TO ACCESS THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION

OF HLL PRODUCTS

&

SERVICE ISSUES IN BHOPAL CITY.

SUBMITTED BY:

MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

M.B.A. III(Full Time) SEMESTER

UNDER THE GUIDANCE

OF

PROF. MUKESH PORWAL

MAHARISHI CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE

MAHARISHI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

BARKATULLAH UNIVERSITY, BHOPAL SESSION (2004 – 2006)

i

Page 3: Ajju Project[1]

DECLARATION

I, MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA a student of M.B.A. (full Time) III semesters of

“MAHARISHI CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE, MAHARISHI

INSTITUE OF MANAGEMENT, Bhopal (2004-2006), hereby declare that the following

project report titled “TO ACCESS THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION OF HLL

PRODUCTS & SERVICE ISSUES IN BHOPAL CITY” is an authentic work done by me.

The project was undertaken as the part of course curriculum of MBA programme, Barkatulla

University, Bhopal. This has not been submitted to any other examination body earlier.

DATE: MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

iii

Page 4: Ajju Project[1]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I take this opportunity to place on record my grateful thanks and sincere gratitude to

Dr. (Col.) Rajesh Malhotra , who gave me valuable advise and input for my study.

I am immensely grateful to my esteemed guide Prof. Mukesh Porwal, whose continued and

invaluable guidance can never be forgotten by me but for whom; this study could not have

got present shape.

Last but not least, I would like to express my thanks to my friends and family members who

inspired me to put best efforts for the survey report

MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

iv

Page 5: Ajju Project[1]

PREFACE

The training provides an opportunity to a student to demonstrate application of his

knowledge, skill and competencies required during the technical session. Training also helps

the student to devote his skill to analyze the problem to suggest alternative solutions, to

evaluate them and to provide feasible recommendations on the provided data.

The project report is on the topic of “TO ACCESS THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION OF

HLL PRODUCTS & SERVICE ISSUES IN BHOPAL CITY” Although I have tried my

level best to prepare this report an error free report every effort has been made to offer the

most authenticate position with accuracy.

v

Page 6: Ajju Project[1]

CONTENTS

Chapter-1 Introduction

- Background of the study

- Identification Of Problem Area

- Justification/ Relevance of the Study

Chapter-II Objectives of the Study

Chapter-III Review of Literature

Chapter-IV Scope & Research Methodology

- Scope of Study

- Research Design

- Type of Study

- Area of the study

- Period of the study

- Sample Design

- Tools of analysis

- Limitations of Study

Chapter-V Data Analysis & Interpretation

Chapter-VI Observations & Findings

Chapter-VII Conclusions & Suggestions

Bibliography

Annexure

- Questionnaire

- curriculum vitae

Page 7: Ajju Project[1]

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE

NO.

TABLE 5.1 SOURCE OF AWARENESS

TABLE 5.2 AWARENESS OF ADVERTISEMENT

TABLE 5.3 BEST MEDIUM OF ADVERTISEMENT

TABLE 5.4 REASON FOR USING HLL PRODUCTS

TABLE 5.5 FACTORS FOR PURCHASING

TABLE 5.6 SATISFACTION LEVEL

TABLE 5.7 PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

TABLE 5.8 PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

TABLE 5.9 BRANDS WHICH OFFER ATTRACTIVE SCHEMES

TABLE 5.10 BRAND IMAGE OF HLL PRODUCTS

Page 8: Ajju Project[1]

LIST OF GRAPHS

GRAPH NO. TITLE PAGE

NO.

GRAPH V.1 SOURCE OF AWARENESS

GRAPH V.2 AWARENESS OF ADVERTISEMENT

GRAPH V.3 BEST MEDIUM OF ADVERTISEMENT

GRAPH V.4 REASON FOR USING HLL PRODUCTS

GRAPH V.5 FACTORS FOR PURCHASING

GRAPH V.6 SATISFACTION LEVEL

GRAPH V.7 PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

GRAPH V.8 PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

GRAPH V.9 BRANDS WHICH OFFER ATTRACTIVE SCHEMES

GRAPH V.10 BRAND IMAGE OF HLL PRODUCTS

Page 9: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – IINTRODUCTION

Page 10: Ajju Project[1]

INTRODUCTION

Hindustan Lever Limited (HLL) is India's largest fast moving consumer goods company,

with

leadership in Home & Personal Care Products and Foods & Beverages. HLL's brands spread

across 20 distinct consumer categories, touch the lives of two out of three Indians. They

endow the company with a scale of combined volumes of about 4 million tonnes and sales of

Rs.10,000 crores.

The leading business magazine, Forbes Global, has rated Hindustan Lever

as the best consumer household products company. Far Eastern Economic Review has rated

HLL as India’s most respected company. Asiamoney has rated HLL as one of India’s best

managed companies. Leading national publications, like The Economic Times, Business

World, and Business Today have also rated HLL as one of India’s most respected companies

and the number one in Market Value Added and EVA.The vision that inspires HLL's 32,400

employees (40,000 including Group Companies), including about 1,425 managers, is to

“meet everyday needs of people everywhere - to anticipate the aspirations of our consumers

and customers and to respond creatively and competitively with branded products and

services which raise the quality of life.” This objective is achieved through the brands that the

company markets.It is an ethos HLL shares with its parent company, Unilever, which holds

51.55% of the equity. A Fortune 500 transnational, Unilever sells Foods and Home and

Personal Care brands through 300 subsidiary companies in about 100 countries worldwide

with products on sale in a further 50.

Page 11: Ajju Project[1]

BUSINESS NATURE

HLL is India's largest marketer of Soaps, Detergents and Home Care products. It has the

country’s largest Personal Products business, leading in Shampoos, Skin Care Products,

Colour Cosmetics,and Deodorants. HLL is also the market leader in Tea, Processed Coffee,

branded Wheat Flour,Tomato Products, Ice cream, Soups, Jams and Squashes.HLL is also

one of the country's biggest exporters and has been recognised as a Golden Super StarTrading

House by the Government of India; it is a net foreign exchange earner. HLL is India's largest

exporter of branded fast moving consumer goods. The company's Exports portfolio includes

HLL's brands of Soaps and Detergents, Personal Products, Home Care Products, Tea and

Coffee.HLL is also driving exports in chosen areas where India has a competitive advantage

– Marine Products, Basmati Rice, Castor Oil and its Derivatives. It is India's largest exporter

of Marine Products, and one of the largest global players in castor.

Page 12: Ajju Project[1]

MARKET LEADING BRANDS

HLL’s brands have become household names. The company’s strategy is to concentrate its

resources on 30 national power brands, and 10 other brands which are strong in certain

regions.The top five brands together account for sales of over Rs.3000 crores. Each of these

mega brands has a potential scale of Rs.1000 crores in the foreseeable future.

Some of the big brands in Soaps and Detergents are Lifebuoy, Lux, Liril, Hamam, Breeze,

Dove,(all soaps), Surf Excel, Surf, Rin, Wheel (the number one detergent brand in India, and

HLL's largest), 501, Sunlight (all detergents). HLL also markets the Vim and Domex range of

Home Care Products.In the Personal Products business, HLL's Hair Care franchises are

Clinic, Sunsilk and Lux shampoos; the company markets Nihar oil. In Oral Care, the

portfolio comprises Close-up and Pepsodent toothpastes and toothbrushes. In Skin Care, HLL

Page 13: Ajju Project[1]

markets Fair & Lovely Skin Cream and Lotion, the largest selling Skin Care Product in India;

a brand developed in India, it is now exported to over 30 countries. It has been extended as an

Ayurvedic cream, an under-eye cream, a soap and a talc, in line with the strategy to take

brands across relevant categories. The other major Skin Care franchises are Pond’s, Vaseline,

Lakme and Pears. In Colour Cosmetics, HLL markets the Lakme and Elle-18 ranges. In

Deodorants, the key brands are Rexona, Axe, Denim and Pond's, while the Talc brands are

Pond's, Liril, Fair & Lovely, Vaseline and Lifebuoy. Axe and Denim are HLL’s franchises

for Men’s toiletries. HLL has recently launched Lever Ayush Ayurvedic Health & Personal

Care Products. Health Care is among the new businesses HLL has chosen to enter. The

product range comprises Cough Naashak Syrup, Headache Naashak Roll-on, Dandruff

Naashak Shampoo, Hair Rakshak Oil and Body Rakshak Soap. The purity of the Ayurvedic

ingredients in Lever Ayush is endorsed by the renowned Arya Vaidya Pharmacy (AVP) of

Coimbatore. It is for the first time that rigorous testing procedures of the pharmaceutical

industry have been applied to Ayurvedic products. That is why the brand seal is ‘Truth of

Ayurveda; Proof of Science’.HLL has started franchised Lakme Beauty Salons, offering

standardised services, in line with the strategy to add a service dimension to relevant brands.

The company has set up the Hindustan Lever Network, a direct selling channel, offering the

Lever Home range of Laundry and Home Care products and the Aviance Personal Care

range.The company has also begun an e-tailing service, called Sangam, which can home-

deliver on order by phone or through the Net, a diverse range of about 5000 branded and

unbranded products. The service is now available in select areas of Mumbai and Navi

Mumbai, besides Thane.HLL is one of the world’s largest packet Tea marketer. Its Tea

brands – Taj Mahal, Red Label,Taaza, A1, 3Roses - are among the top brands in the country;

it also markets Lipton Ice Tea.HLL and Pepsi have formed an alliance to distribute a full

range of tea and coffee and soft beverages through vending machines; HLL already has a

base of around 15000 such machines. The coffee business comprises Bru Instant Coffee and

Deluxe Green Label Roast & Ground Coffee. The Kissan and Knorr Foods range comprises

Spreads & Jams, Biscuit Sticks, Soups, Squashes,Tomato Ketchup, Sauces, Puree, and

Cooking Aids.Popular Foods, like Wheat Flour and Iodized Edible Salt, under the Knorr

Annapurna brand name,have met with remarkable success. The range has been expanded

with ready-to-eat 10-second chapatis. The innovative offerings are changing consumer habits

Page 14: Ajju Project[1]

into using processed, hygienic,healthy and convenient products.The Kwality-Wall's Ice

Cream range comprises exotic Sundaes, Viennetta Desserts, popular ‘Impulse’ segment

products like Max, Cornetto and Feast, and Cornetto Ripple Softies.

Max was extended in 2001 as sugar confectioneries, because children are a key consumer

segment in confectioneries too. This is among the new businesses HLL has chosen to enter.

HLL has acquired Modern Food Industries (India) Limited, entering the bread market.

Modern

Foods was the first Public Sector Undertaking to be disinvested. Besides upgrading the

existing

Modern products, HLL has launched new products, among them biscuits.HLL is liberating its

brands from their existing category mindset. Historically, brands originated and stayed within

a category format. HLL sees its Power Brands as being able to occupy a unique position in

the consumer's mind and therefore being able to stretch into other product formats and

categories. All such initiatives have had a promising start, and there are more to come.

Page 15: Ajju Project[1]

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Hindustan Lever Limited Hi

• 42,000 employees

• 1425 managers

• 80 company factories

• 150 outsourcing units

• 2000 suppliers & associates

Page 16: Ajju Project[1]

OVER 100 YEARS’ LINK WITH INDIA

The expertise and commitment of HLL's employees, coupled with Lever's more than 100

years' link with India, gives the company a formidable competitive advantage. The first

Unilever product came to India in 1888, when Sunlight soap was introduced through imports.

Lifebuoy was introduced in 1895 and other famous brands like Pears, Lux and Vim followed.

Vanaspati was launched in 1918 and the famous Dalda brand came to the market in 1937.In

1931, Unilever set up its first Indian subsidiary, Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing

Company,

followed by Lever Brothers India Limited (1933) and United Traders Limited (1935). These

three companies merged to form HLL in November 1956; HLL offered 10% of its equity to

the Indian public, being the first among the foreign subsidiaries to do so. Unilever, which

gradually divested its stake in HLL, now holds 51.55% equity in the company. The rest of the

shareholding is distributed among about 380,000 individual shareholders and financial

institutions. The erstwhile Brooke Bond's presence in India dates back to 1900. By 1903, the

company had launched Red Label tea in the country. In 1912, Brooke Bond & Co. India

Limited was formed.Brooke Bond joined the Unilever fold in 1984 through an international

acquisition.The erstwhile Lipton's links with India were forged in 1898. Unilever acquired

Lipton in 1972, and in 1977 Lipton Tea (India) Limited was incorporated. Pond’s (India)

Limited had been present in India since 1947. It joined the Unilever fold through an

International acquisition of Chesebrough Pond’s USA in 1986. Since the very early years,

HLL has vigorously responded to the stimulus of economic growth. The growth process has

been accompanied by judicious diversification, always in line with Indian opinions and

aspirations.

Page 17: Ajju Project[1]

Unparalleled Distribution Un

Nationwide distribution with 7000 stockists

Directly covers

Entire urban population through 1 million outlets

50,000 villages

Power Brands

HLL has identified 30 power brands out of its 110 portfolio. These 30 brands, covering key

product segments contribute to over 75% of profits. In 2001, company concentrated on these

profitable brands and has defocused on the others. Power brands registered a 6.5% yoy

growth in 2001, as against a 1.1% degrowth in other brands. Overall, net sales grew by 3.5%

yoy. Operating profit on power brands was higher by 9.7% as against a 8.1% growth in

operating profit of other brands. The main power brand of HLL is given as follows:

Surf Clinic Modern

Rin Sunsilk Knorr

Wheel Nihar Kwality Walls

Vim Fair & Lovely Brooke Bond

Lux Ponds Taj Mahal

Pears Lakme A1

Breeze Pepsodent 3 Roses

Lifebuoy Closeup Lipton Taaza

Liril Kissan Bru

Rexona Annapurna Dalda

Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestments

Page 18: Ajju Project[1]

74 % equity stake in Modern Foods was acquired in Jan 2000, the balance 26% stake

would be acquired in 2002 at an approx cost of Rs450mn.

Rossell Industries became a subsidiary of HLL, post acquisition of 59% stake by

100% subsidiary Lipton India Exports.

Bestfoods India, acquired through global acquisition of Bestfoods Inc by Unilever

was merged into HLL in 2001.

100% subsidiary Aviance was merged into HLL. Also the assets and liabilities of the

color cosmetics, fragrances and personal care business of subsidiary Lakme Lever Ltd

were acquired by HLL.

AFS business through subsidiary Gold Mohur Foods was divested to Godrej Agrovet

in two tranches (74% in Jan 2001, 26% in Sep 2001)

Adhesive and Nickel Catalyst business divested to ICI. JV formed for Quest Flavors

and Fragrances business.

A new JV – Toc Disinfectants has been formed with SC Johnson wherein the

disinfectant business of erstwhile Lever Johnson has been transferred. Over a period

of time, HLL will assume control over the disinfectant company – Toc, while SC

Johnson will completely take over other businesses of insect control and air care..

New ventures

HLL has launched confectionery under the well know Children brand Max in 2001. HLL is

the first Unilever subsidiary to have entered the Confectionery business and forms part of the

initiative to leverage global brands to create local businesses.

An entry into the Healthcare segment is being considered and test marketing will be

undertaken in 2002.

An e-tailing initiative Sangam Direct, to meet bulk grocery needs of consumers (through

website/ call centers) has been undertaken

Royalty

HLL entered into a 24-year royalty payment agreement with its parent Unilever in F12/98

under which HLL pays a 1% royalty on net ex-factory sales, in lieu of technology support

provided by the parent. No royalty is paid on turnover from oral care products, laundry soaps,

hair oil, staple foods, specialty chemicals, animal feed and dairy products.

Earnings sensitivity factors

Page 19: Ajju Project[1]

Volume growth in personal products (skin care, oral acre, hair care, and cosmetics),

and ability to protect market share

Competition activity, in particular the pricing and advertising strategies of main

competitors.

Success of new launches and improving profitability of the foods business, which has

been identified as the thrust area.

Raw material (oil, soda ash, LAB etc) prices, as cost increases cannot be passed on

fully, in a competitive scenario.

Background

Three Unilever companies were merged in 1956 to form HLL. These companies were

Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing Company -edible oil (established in 1931), Lever

Brothers India Limited- soaps (1933) and United Traders-personal products (1935).

About 10% of the equity was offered to the public by way of an IPO in 1956. To comply

with FERA, Unilever's stake was further diluted to 51% in the late 70's. To retain 51%

foreign holding, HLL complied with stringent export and other stipulations imposed by

the government, and diversified into businesses such as chemicals, fertilizers and

exports. Ponds joined the Unilver fold through a global acquisition in 1986. In the last

decade, HLL has expanded its operations by the merger and takeover route. It acquired

TOMCO - an ailing Tata group company (1993), merged Unilever group companies

Brooke Bond Limited (1996) and Ponds' India (1998), and has acquired cosmetic

business of another Tata group company Lakme (1998). Shareholding pattern

Unilever 51.55 %

Mutual Funds and UTI 3.78 %

Banks, Financial Institutions, Insurance Companies, other institutions 10.09 %

Foreign Institutional Investors 12.83 %

Indian public 21.57 %

COMMODITISATION OF BRANDS

The Indian Market Place: Let us see what is happening. Lakme Moisturisers (60 ml Bottle)

free with Lipton Green Label Tea, Rs. 35 off on buying Gillette series Deo Body Spray, Kaun

Banega Crorepati Britannia offer, Pears soap free with every 200-ml Lakme Moisturisers,

Page 20: Ajju Project[1]

150 gm Palmolive extra care worth Rs. 27 on buying 250 gm Colgate Dental Cream, 200 gm

Kissan Tom-Tom free with every % Kg pack of Kissan Fortified Atta, 500 grams of Kissan

Annapurna Iodised Salt free with One kg of Kissan Annapurna fortified Atta, 15% off on

Bombay Dying clothing…Oh a very long-unending list.

Am I really talking about one of the most successful brands in the Indian marketplace. Aren't

a brand is the sum of expectations that a stakeholder or customer has when purchasing a

product or dealing with an organization, or is the mental image generated when exposed to a

product or company name. Why brands are important for customers, whether they work for

customers, or they simplify everyday choices or they reduce the risk of complicated buying

decisions or they provide emotional benefits or they offer a sense of community. Well the

obvious answer Yes but after looking at these offers I can only say "I guess so".

Why am I saying that company's are increasingly relying on a variety of sales promotion

offers and because of that customer is getting trained to buy on price, in effect the world is

turning back to hundred years to the time when commodities, not brands, filled the shopping

basket. Commodities are undifferentiated and are sold on price competition. Many brand

managers seem to aim for a "me-to" position reflecting their desire to be all things to all

people. Lack of uniqueness is commoditisation, and it makes a brand vulnerable. But why is

that happening, all these tactics given above used by the companies to increase their market

share results in lack of uniqueness of a brand, which is commoditisation.

So what do we need to do, The industry needs a "common change language" regardless of

channel or segment. We must address and resolve the burning issues for long-term survival.

The real issues that retailers and manufacturers must confront and resolve is that most

branded companies are working to maintain and build consumption demand not

brand/shareholder equity. The "commoditisation" of categories and products is forcing

suppliers to shift financial resources to support cost reductions in manufacturing and existing

product formulations (therefore impacting quality) in an effort to lower prices and maintain

desired margins and market share. Less support for brands and new product development is a

Page 21: Ajju Project[1]

dangerous sign of commoditisation, where costs and price, not "value-added" products or

services, drive decision-making.

The advertising Guru David Ogilvy has said in 1986 in New York on the occasion of 50th

anniversary of Advertising Research Foundation "Any damn fool can put on a deal, but it

takes a genius, faith and perseverance to create a brand."

He has addressed the problem and its solution in one of his speech in 1955, also he said, "The

time has come to sound an alarm! To warn what is going to happen to brands if so much is

spent on deals that there is no money left to advertise them."

"Deals don't build the kind of indestructible image which is the only thing that can make your

brand part of the fabric of a persons life".

"The manufacturer who dedicate their advertising to building a favourable image, the most

sharply defined personality for their brand, are the ones who will get the largest share of

market at the highest profits."

To sum it up with a real life story let me elaborate the fight between an FMCG giant HLL's

Fair & Lovely and a new entrant CavinKare Limited's (CKL) Fairever fairness cream. Fair &

Lovely has dominated the fairness beauty cream market since its launch in 1975, it has a

market share of 90% in 1998, when CKL has launched its Fairever cream in January 1998,

with a unique proposition of "Saffron", which has quietly got the customer's attention, who

was looking for a new product since years. Fairever even after being priced higher then F&L

was catching the market-share. HLL attacked with its promotional offers of price cut and

extra cream but the rise in Fairever remain continued and today it has market share of 15%. It

is surprising to know that Fairever is just a me-too brand of F&L with similar formulation. So

why was HLL loosing the market share. F&L was just like a commodity brand and when

Fairever has offered value of Saffron, customers tend to accept that and HLL lost, even with

its promotional offers.

Page 22: Ajju Project[1]

The bottom-line is Brands are products that are distinguished from others. Brands constantly

evolve. Successful brand proprietors manage to anticipate market shifts and reposition and

develop their brands accordingly.

Page 23: Ajju Project[1]

HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD - STILL THE BEST OR GLORY DAYS OVER

For the motion - A must for every portfolio, says The Bull

Still the best stock, says the Bull. Hindustan Lever has underperformed despite almost no

change in fundamentals. This is the best time to buy.

Against the motion - Yesterday's hero, tomorrow's ???,   says The Bear

The Bear begs to differ. It is an excellent company, agreed. But the market has changed.

Your views on the topic

Hindustan Lever- A must for every portfolio

The largest FMCG player with a presence in almost every FMCG product category; market

leadership or #2 position in most of these categories, a strong brand portfolio, unmatched

distribution network; a business with a vast growth potential - given India's population size &

current per capita consumption levels; and the most respected management in the country -

What more can you ask for?

Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL) - the largest personal products company in the country with a

63% market share in toilet soaps, 38% share in detergent powders, 48% in detergent bars,

60% share in dish cleaning segment, 72% share in shampoo, 60% share in skin care and 37%

share in oral care. In the foods business also, where the focus has increased in last few years,

HLL has established a significant presence in all segments. Market share figures for major

foods businesses are Packet Tea (41%), Coffee (45%), Jams (75%), Ketchup (38%),

Vanaspati (28%), Staple foods (20%).

Average sales CAGR in the last ten years has been 29.5%, driven partly by successful

acquisitions like Kwality, Dollops, TOMCO, BrookeBond and Lakme. But even sans the

mergers, HLL would have maintained an average of 18% yoy growth pa. Net profit has

grown at a compounded rate of 37% during the same period

Page 24: Ajju Project[1]

The company has constantly improved return on capital employed as well as returns to

shareholders. Infact, the Indian subsidiary has been Unilever's largest success story in any

Asian country.

HLL's key strength in a vast country such as ours has been its unmatched distribution reach

through a stockist network of 7000 and a retail reach of over 1mn outlets. It is the only

company which distributes its products to more than 50000 villages. Innovative programmes

like Project Bharat have been undertaken which aim to make available to every consumer in

the remotest corner of the country, products that meet his day to day requirements.

Also the management is well known for its marketing savvy. It has over the years studied and

understood the Indian markets as no other MNC player has. It has adapted its products to suit

the Indian tastes. A lot of wars have been played and won on the price front, acknowledging

that the Indian consumer is extremely price sensitive. The financial strength to cross

subsidize new initiatives with existing profitable businesses has enabled the company to

achieve its zeal of being the dominating player in all markets that it enters into.

While the personal products business has been the revenue driver during the last few years,

growth rates in the category (specially like detergents and toilet soaps) are likely to taper off

once certain penetration levels are reached. The company has been therefore consiously

building up an extended product range which are at various stages of the growth cycle. As Mr

Dadi Seth emphasizes, "The building of the personal products business was started 10 years

ago, and the benefits are being reaped now. Similarly we are investing in the foods business

today - as that will be the revenue driver in the future." Although profitability in the foods

business may still be a few years away, once the branded foods market really matures, the

potential for volume growth in the business are enormous.

Nor has the company ever given loyal shareholders a reason to be unhappy about its

performance in the bourses. The stock market performance has year after year been more

than satisfactory. Just look at the comparison of annualized returns earned by major food and

personal products companies viz a viz Sensex returns in the last ten years.

  Market MNC's Indian

  Sensex HLL Britannia Colgate Nestle Dabur Nirma Marico

Dec-90 46.4 39.4 1.2 43.8 16.9 - - -

Page 25: Ajju Project[1]

Dec-91 82.1 70.7 131.0 79.0 81.4 - - -

Dec-92 37.0 124.2 (1.0) 60.0 50.0 - - -

Dec-93 27.9 55.4 50.0 112.8 13.2 - - -

Dec-94 17.4 2.6 (9.7) (7.9) 12.7 (7.5) 74.4 -

Dec-95 (20.8) 5.8 (51.4) (36.0) (24.8) (37.3) (22.4) -

Dec-96 (0.8) 29.5 45.6 (12.7) 5.0 6.9 (32.2) (16.8)

Dec-97 18.6 71.3 75.5 9.3 29.1 (17.3) 31.0 8.9

Dec-98 (16.5) 20.2 116.0 (23.6) 68.0 107.8 (18.4) 36.8

Dec-99 63.8 35.2 18.6 9.2 (5.9) 177.0 132.6 (5.4)

   

10 year

CAGR

21.5 41.6 25.9 15.2 20.7 19.8 14.7 4.0

Only one company has had no red marks (negative returns) in any single year. Even when

market as a whole plunged by 21% in 1995, investments in HLL earned investors 6% returns.

And the average return over the last ten years has been 41.6%. Compare this with the average

market return of 21.5%. A Rs100 investment made in the Sensex in Dec '90 would have

grown to Rs699 by Dec '99. The same investment made in Hindustan Lever would have

grown to Rs3247 in the same period!

HLL – yesterday’s best, tomorrow’s????

My friend, the Bull has given a data heavy argument for buying HLL. I have one big problem

- it is all historical. Agreed that it was the bluest of blue chips and loyal shareholders have

made a lot of money in it. But I ask you, is there no change in the environment which makes

HLL unattractive now? We take a look at some such changes

Emergence of alternatives: Two years back, most funds had two stocks accounting for

more than 30% of the value- HLL and ITC. Ask the fund manager and he would say-

there is no other large and liquid stock worth buying with earnings growth, high

ROCE and good management. Well, their complaints have been answered with the

Page 26: Ajju Project[1]

emergence of companies like Infosys, NIIT, Zee , Hughes, etc. The funds have

responded by switching stocks very fast. And why should they return as long as

exciting stocks keep coming up?

Cost push will squeeze margins- It is common knowledge that the FMCG sector picks

the tail of a recession and we are close to that stage. The last year has probably been

the worst in terms of consumer demand. Currently, indications are that the industrial

sector is picking up which would signal a revival in consumer demand in the next

year or so. But this time could also be the worst for FMCG companies because

increasing commodity prices will push costs while price increases have to be low.

Margins will be squeezed.

The big leap is over- I remember the stock being rerated in 1997 when it jumped from

Rs 700 to almost Rs1600 (it was a big jump during those times) and the primary

driver was the leap in ROCE from 46% to 61%. A similar jump will not happen in the

next three- five years. So, where is the kick in the stock?

HLL is not attracting the best people anymore. Globalisation has meant that dollar

salaries and stock options are luring the brightest in campuses. Though HLL is still

amongst the top, it is not the same. And it also affecting the middle and top rung

management.

The reducing power of brands- If you have visited supermarkets, you will realise that

lower priced generics are making headway. And they are not of bad quality also. It is

again a question of alternatives. Indians are known to be probably the most value

conscious consumers and it is inevitable that the price premium enjoyed by brands

will come down. Another revolution is of course internet. P&G US has already started

a new website in which you input your hair colour, texture, your income, etc. It then

designs, manufactures and delivers a custom made shampoo with even your name on

it. Such a concept is a direct attack on creating brands and the competitive advantage

arising out of those brands. Over the years, product quality will be the only deciding

factor- packaging and communication will lose relevance.

Well, I could give ten more reasons why it is still not late to exit the stock, but I’ll leave that

to some other time. I have the highest regard for the company and its people. But times are a

changing.

Page 27: Ajju Project[1]

Hindustan Lever Ltd

HLL's profit growth in Q4 F12/04 was significantly below our expectations, largely due

to unanticipated write off's for Modern Foods and discontinued confectionery business

(cumulatively ~ Rs1.2bn). Sales registered a decline of 2.1% yoy at Rs99.3bn during the

year. Net profit recording a huge degrowth of 32.4% yoy to Rs12bn as margins dipped

500bps. Lower treasury income and increased interest burden further depressed profitability.

Continuing sales increased marginally by 0.3% yoy due to sharp 7.4% yoy degrowth in foods

segment. Sales from HPC segment grew by 2.2% yoy to Rs68.8bn. Exports for the year grew

by 2% yoy to Rs12.5bn.

The management of HLL held its analyst meet to discuss Q4 F12/04 and F12/04 performance

and the outlook for the industry and the company in the years to come. The key takeaways

from the meet were as follows:

HPC

HPC segment grew by 4.9% in volume and 3.4% yoy in value terms to Rs18.3bn during the

quarter under review. While, for the full year sales from HPC segment increased by 2.2% yoy

to Rs68.8bn.

Laundry and Personal Wash (44.4% of sales, 44.5% of profit)

Soaps & detergent sales grew 2.1% yoy to Rs44.7bn in F12/04. In Q4, HLL’s laundry

segment registered more than 8% growth in value and volume terms. Rin, Surf and Wheel all

have registered a good growth. Laundry market share has improved in volume terms and

maintained in value terms during the year.

Page 28: Ajju Project[1]

In the personal wash category, Lifebuoy achieved good sales growth with highest market

share however, revenues from Lux declined in Q4. HLL launched Petalsoft soap during the

year. The company has lost over 2.3% market share during the year.

Personal products (24.6% of sales, 46.4% of profit)

Personal products sales grew by 2.6% yoy to Rs24.7bn in F12/04. In Q4 F12/04, sales grew

by 1.2% yoy to Rs7bn while, volumes increased sharply by 8.7%.

Page 29: Ajju Project[1]

i) Skin: The company managed to maintain its growth rate of 8%+ in the skin care category

on a larger base. HLL’s all brands have recorded good growth and increase in market share.

ii) Toothpaste

The company was able to increase its market share and sales in the toothpaste category

despite stiff competition from low priced brands.

iii) Shampoo

The shampoo volumes were marginally lower while, the value share decreased to 47.1%

during Q4 F12/04.

Beverages (12% of sales, 13.7% of profits)

Beverages sales increased marginally by 0.9% yoy to Rs11.9bn in F12/04. However in Q4,

sales grew by 7.1% yoy to Rs3.3bn aided by strong 15.5% growth in Brooke Bond, which

gained 4.5% market share during the year. Lipton recorded a strong double-digit growth

during the year. Tea market share has risen from 29% to 30.2%. Coffee value market share

has declined to 41.2% in Q4 FY04, but has improved share during the year.

Page 30: Ajju Project[1]

Processed foods (2.8% of sales, loss of Rs818mn)

Processed food revenues dropped by 52.7% yoy to Rs2.9bn in F12/04. While, during Q4,

revenues declined by 42.4% to Rs622mn due to phased stock reduction, withdrawal of ’03

innovation and defocusing of Atta in unviable geographies. The company was able to

maintain market share of jams, ketchup and salt categories. The company has completed the

restructuring of the foods segment and expects the food business to move into a positive

growth trajectory in the future.

Financial Highlights

Period to 12/04 12/03 Growth 12/04 12/03 Growth

Page 31: Ajju Project[1]

(Rs mn) (3) (3) (%) (12) (12) (%)

Sales 26,008 25,835 0.7 99,270 101,384 (2.1)

Expenditure (21,809) (19,732) 10.5 (84,896) (81,617) 4.0

Operating profit 4,199 6,103 (31.2) 14,374 19,767 (27.3)

Other income 916 1,011 (9.4) 3,188 4,598 (30.7)

Interest (323) (323) 0.0 (1,300) (668) 94.7

Depreciation (331) (329) 0.5 (1,209) (1,248) (3.1)

PBT 4,461 6,461 (31.0) 15,053 22,449 (32.9)

Tax (886) (838) 5.7 (3,060) (4,406) (30.5)

PAT 3,575 5,623 (36.4) 11,993 18,043 (33.5)

Extraordinary items (238) (676) (64.7) (19) (325) (94.1)

APAT 3,337 4,947 (32.6) 11,974 17,718 (32.4)

OPM (%) 16.1 23.6 - 14.5 19.5 -

Equity 2,201 2,201 - 2,201 2,201 -

EPS (Rs) Annualized 6.1 9.0 - 5.4 8.0 -

P/E 24 -   27 -  

Page 32: Ajju Project[1]

Mirror mirror on the wall which product makes me fairest of all!

Years of British rule have made Indians obsessed with white skin and so has been the

preoccupation with fair skin and the desire to have it. This obsession coupled with the

increasing awareness among the Indian women towards skin protection has resulted in the

spurt in the fairness products market. Be it a fairness cream or a soap or a tablet, every

product in this segment is witnessing growth larger than the overall personal care product

category. The fairness cream market has been galloping at 25% p.a. as compared to the

overall cosmetic market growth of 15% p.a.

Background

In the past, the market for fairness products was not at all developed as people used

homemade products only viz. besan, multani mitti, etc. because we Indians have been under a

strong influence of herbal products and have habit of using "desi nuskhe". The companies

used to sell their fairness products under the categories of sunscreen lotions, vanishing

creams, cold creams etc. Usage of Talcum powder for fairness purposes was quite prevalent

in earlier days.

The Fairness products market over the years

It was in1975 when HLL launched its first fairness cream under the Fair and Lovely (F&L)

brand. With launch of F&L, the market, which was dominated by Ponds and Lakme started

undergoing a change. The dominance of HLL's F&L continued till 1998 when for the first

time CavinCare launched its Fairever cream pitted directly against F&L. Fairever too proved

to be a big success capturing more than 6% of market share within six months of its launch.

The success of Fairever has prompted many more players to test waters and they too have

proved to be successful. Today there are 7 main brands in the fairness product market

available across the country and there would be many more in the regional market but the

market seems to have a place for everybody.

Page 33: Ajju Project[1]

Table 1: Major players

Players Brand Product category

HLL Fair & Lovely Cream, soap

Emami Naturally Fair Cream

Cavin Care Fairever Cream

Paras Freshia Cream

Godrej Fair Glow Soap, Cream

PondsPonds fairness cream,

Ponds cold creamCream, Lotion

LakmeLakme SunScreen lotion,

Lakme sunscreen creamCream, Lotion

Source: India Infoline

The strong growth in the demand and success of new players in the market has prompted

existing players to venture into cross categorization. Ponds did attempt cross categorization

when it launched its Fairness cream under the same brand as its vanishing and cold cream but

it failed to do big. The market however continued to be dominated by F&L with more than

80% share.

Cross Categorization … A rising trend

During FY00, Godrej Soaps came out with a new product category, fairness soaps. Till then

the concept of fairness products was limited to something that is supposed to be applied to the

skin, something that forms a layer on the skin. The company launched its Fair Glow brand of

fairness soap at a discount price of Rs10/- per cake. The product was a tremendous success

and it registered a sale of more than Rs700mn in the first year of its launch. The brand is still

growing in double digits, which is much more than the growth rate of 3-4% of the entire soap

market. Seeing the success of this new product Godrej soaps also tried cross categorization

and launched a fairness cream under the same brand, Fair Glow. This product is also selling

like hot cakes in the market. Add to this, the company's strategy of launching smaller SKUs

Page 34: Ajju Project[1]

in the market. This has made the entire Fair Glow brand to develop strong equity in just one

year.

The success story of Fair Glow along with aggressiveness of other fairness creams in the

market led to threat of erosion F&L's market share. In order to restrict this erosion of share

HLL introduced discount schemes on F&L purchases, which failed to create the desired

euphoria. Finally in March'01 HLL decided to leverage the brand equity of its F&L brand and

launched its F&L fairness soap.

With so many success stories in cross categorization and new product in the fairness cream

market, the success of F&L soap too seems likely and I think other players would also

follow to increase their share in this market.

Though most of these fairness products are based on one simple formula of controlling

dispersion of Melanin (the pigment that controls the skin colour), different companies are

adding a number of other additives to position themselves differently from others and it is

this positioning that makes the difference.

As of now, the scenario is encouraging for a number of players who have the opportunity to

cash on. The market is not restricted to an HLL or a Godrej alone. What is important is their

positioning and the style of their appeal for "making consumers fairest of all" that will make

the difference.

 

Page 35: Ajju Project[1]

THE CHANGING FACE OF FMCG MARKETING

FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) marketing is no more going to be the same again!

The changing consumer mindset thanks to more knowledgeable and discerning customers

coupled with changing competition and saturated market is giving a tough time to the FMCG

marketers. The changed scenario not only demands a new game plan with a sharp and

decisive strategy but also a lot of creativity and insight. Some of the players in Indian FMCG

industry have already taken a lead and are smartly moving to chart a success story for their

brands. Some brands that reaped magnificent dividend from adopting a new strategy are

Fairever, Ujala, Ghadi detergent, Chik, and Dandi namak. If we analyze the success story of

these brands, it will be self evident that their marketing strategy is not a jargon filled new

model of marketing. It is more of common sense marketing. But then, common sense is not

so common!

Razor Sharp Focus

A common thread that binds the strategy adopted by these brands is razor sharp focus. They

clearly see their target market. They know their customers well. They are not targeting

consumers who already have built-in perceptions. They are reaching out to untapped market

within a well known product category. Their primary focus is on millions of lower middle

class families in small towns and rural segment. They are doing what legendry management

guru C K Prahlad advocates when he says in his published paper, "Raising the Bottom of the

Pyramid: Strategies for Sustainable Growth" that the greatest challenge for managers is to

visualize an active market when what exists is abject poverty. These successful brands are

just doing that- focusing on untapped markets. Take the example of Dandi namak. Who

would have advised them to enter the branded salt market when Tata and HLL virtually share

the whole market among them? But they entered this category when conventional wisdom

said no. And they became a success story overnight. How? The answer is focus. They entered

the market not to compete with Tata and HLL, but with the focus to take branded salt to rural

and semi-urban areas. With this narrow focus, they not only captured a large rural and semi-

urban market but also got some share of the urban market due to rub off effect.

Page 36: Ajju Project[1]

Moreover, these small players fully realize that in today’s world, marketing needs money. So

they don’t shy away from investing in marketing. Again take the example of Dandi namak.

They splashed out money on their lengthy TV commercials to ensure that the message gets

ingrained in the mind of the prospect. Fairever and Ujala adopted the same strategy. Of

course they don’t spend as much as the MNCs do but they do spend enough to get attraction.

The best part is when they get attention and a little success, MNC Goliaths retaliate back with

huge spending and these little Davids piggyback on that!

Communicating 2 Consumers

One of the important aspects of the strategy being adopted is effective communication about

product. These wannabe marketers are sending just the right message to the consumers. If the

advertisements of these brands are analyzed, it will be evident that they don’t go for blitz but

instead try to relate themselves with their target customers. To achieve this object, they are

not shying away from being unconventional. Take the case of Dandi namak. The TV

advertisement was bland and uninteresting. However, without any glitz, it was able to

connect to its target customers because it talked in the language of its target customers. These

brands send a powerful message to their target customers that they are made for each other.

Dandi namak, Ujala, Ghadi detergent, and Chik, projected that they belonged to the lower

middle class! And this worked wonders.

Selecting a narrow terrain to fight!

The stratagem of this new breed of marketing is deciding the opponent to fight! In case of

most of these brands, it is seen that they fight their marketing battle by selecting a particular

company and in many cases a particular brand, which often is the market leader! Then they

deploy their entire marketing arsenal on this selected competitor. Ujala applied this tactic to

full advantage against Robin Blue and now it commands nearly three-fourth of the Rs2bn

ultra marine blue market, Fairever did the same to Fair & Lovely, Ghadi detergent is doing it

now to Nirma and Wheel, and Chik is going shoulder to shoulder with Clinic Plus, the market

Page 37: Ajju Project[1]

leader in shampoo. The case of Dandi namak is different only in the sense that it selected its

battlefield instead of opponent. The battlefield, rural and semi-urban market, was such that no

major marketing war was fought on it before. Even the advertising strategy is designed with

an eye on its opponent. This hurts the big companies badly. They wake up from their

complacent sleep to realize that they are being brutally attacked. And by the time they

retaliate, it’s too late and they only succeed in helping these brands get more attention. HLL

realized that it’s brand Fair & Lovely was in danger only after Fairever had garnered a

healthy market share within months of its launch. Retaliatory advertising by Fair & Lovely

only helped Fairever gain more attention!

The way these homegrown marketers are inducing insomnia to Kotler fed B-school grads is

really amazing. By their ability to be flexible, innovative, and being close to their customers,

they are conquering Indian market, which many MNCs find a tough nut to crack. The secret

of their success is not hard to guess. It is connecting with the heart and soul of India- the

lower middle class and the rural consumers. Are the FMCG giants listening?

IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM AREA

If we look at the market ,we find majority of brands are homogenous, little in

differentiation there are no more value proposition.

Page 38: Ajju Project[1]

Almost every country is trying hard to differentiate their image both tangibility &

intangibility.

In this Report the main intention is to analyze the consumer behavior in HLL Infos.

Lack of consumer awareness about HLL

The advertisement of HLL is satisfactory but it is not widely. It need more

advertising.

JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

Although faced with the limitations mentioned a sincere effort was made to minimize

these limitations. I have tried my best to accomplish the primary objective as well as the

secondary objective of my study. My report remained within the framework of scientific

Page 39: Ajju Project[1]

study as I opted sample method for my project. I made use of questionnaire method for

collecting the data. Field investigation and interviews were done personally. As regards to the

study the questionnaire was formulated systematically and in scientific manner so as to cover

all aspects of the subject and to obtain accurate data from the respondents. The analysis were

made on the data's given by the consumer whom when contacted were ready to give their

response and other valuable information. Thus the interpretation and analysis of the data will

fully justify the report prepared and the same can be considered as a genuine one. This report

Helped me to increase my practical knowledge of the management field and help in my

summer training project

Page 40: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – IIOBJECTIVES OF THE

STUDY

Page 41: Ajju Project[1]

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The are mainly two objectives namely

Primary objectives & Secondary objectives

Primary objectives

To study the various series of Hindustan lever limited in market.

Secondary objectives

To find out the factors that would increase the efficiency and strength of H.L.L. product.

To know the problems confronted by the customers.

Main Objectives

The main objective behind this report was to get insight into the marketing related activities.

To know about the various activities of company.

To know the consumer behavior while purchasing the product.

To know the problem confronted by the company to beat the competition.

Examine the taste of consumer that what they want in the product of H.L.L. Examine the satisfaction level of the consumer with product of H.L.L.

To know the market share and mind share of the customer.

To know actually what is a market.

Page 42: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – IIIREVIEW OF

LITERATURE

Page 43: Ajju Project[1]

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

I. REVIEW OF BOOKS

1. Sharma,D.D(2002):’Marketing Research’,Sultan Chand Sons, New Delhi

The customer market consists of all the individuals and householders who can buy or acquire

goods and service for personal consumption. Customers are tremendously in age, income,

education level, mobility pattern and taste. Marketers find it useful to distinguish different

customer groups and to develop products and services tailored to their need.

The areas of customer perception in marketing research are important because about 80% of

national income are constituted by expenditure incurred by the customer. The study of the

customer behaviour is a part of sociology economics and politics. Marketing is Concerned

with the inter exchange of goods and services between the producer and customer. Customer

behavior constitutes at least in part environment in which the producer operates. And in

which the management has to make decision and implement them.

Basically the research follows a truism, the customer are always bright therefore the needs of

the customer are of prime importance and must be investigated the customer and reports on

his habits, his likes and dislikes, to the manufacturer or to the advertiser.

2. Kotler, Philip. (1999):’Marketing Management’ Prentice Hall Of India Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi.

A customer is a person who brings his wants, whether the customer is perception after

purchase depends on the offers performance in relation to the customer’s expectation.

Is a person feeling of pleasure or disappointment resulting from comparing a

product’s perceived performance or outcomes in relation to his or her expectations. As

definition make clear perception is a function of perceived performance and expectations if

Page 44: Ajju Project[1]

performance falls short of expectations the customer is dissatisfied. If the performance are

perception or delighted.

Perception is a persons feeling of pleasure or disappointment resulting from comparing

product perceived performance in relation to his or her expectations.

Perception is a function of perceived performance and expectations. If the performance

matches the expectations, the customer is perception.

If the performance exceeds expectations, the customer is highly perception or delighted. The

customers play a vital role in the health of the economy.

Thus, we see that the customers play a vital role and hence the markets should aim to manage

customer perception.

Page 45: Ajju Project[1]

3. Chabbra, T.N. (2004):’Marketing Management’ Dhanpat Rai & Co. (Pvt) Ltd.,

New Delhi

Customer perception is a function of customer expectations of the products perceived

performance. If the product matches up to the expectations the customer is perception, it is

exceeds then he is highly perception, if it falls short then the customer is dissatisfied.

A service is any act or performance that one party can offer To another that is essentially

intangible and does not result .In the ownership of any thing. Its production may or may not

be tied to a physical product.

Services have four major characteristics that greatly affect the design of marketing programs: Intangibility,Inseparability,Variability,Perishability

Customers form their expectation on the basis of messages and claims sent out by the seller

and other communication sources. If the seller makes exaggerated claims for the product, the

customer experience disconfirmed expectation, which lead to dissatisfaction. The amount of

dissatisfaction depends upon the size of difference between expectations and performance

contrast theory says that the amount of dissatisfaction well be large then the performance gap.

Cognitive dissonance theory says that the amount of dissatisfaction will be less because

customer will try to reduce the dissonance by imputing higher performance. Some sellers

even understand performance levels so that the customers will experience higher than

expected perception from the product.

If the purchased brad fails to deliver the expected perception to the buyers, the buyers will

revise downwards his attitude towards the brand. On the other hand, a perception experience

will tend to strengthen the buyers brand preference.

Customer behaviour is an interdisciplinary field of study that focuses on how and why

customers behave as they do. Its objective is to understand, explain, and predict customer

actions. The study of customer behaviour is the study of now individuals makes decisions to

spend their available resources.

Page 46: Ajju Project[1]

(Money, time, effort) on consumption related items. It includes the study of what the

customers buy, why they buy it and how often they buy it, where they buy it and how often

they buy it Although this text focus on how and why customers make decisions to buy goods

and services, customers make decisions to buy goods and service, customers behaviour.

Research also considers the uses customer make of the goods they buy and their evaluations

of these goods after use.

The study of customer behaviour holds great interest for the customers also. The customers

need insight into their own consumption related decisions what is buy, why to buy and how

to buy. The study of customer behaviour makes them aware of that product or services.

It is important for the markets to recognize why and how individuals make their consumption

decisions so that we make better strategic decisions. Without doubt, marketers who

understand customer behaviour have a great competitive advantage in the market place.

What are customers seeking?

The customer market buys products and service to perception a variety of needs

physiological, social, psychological and spiritual. Economics say that customers are a utility

maxi miser that is they will use their limited resources to aquire a bundle of goods that will

put them on the highest utility curve.

In considering a particular good, the customer will see it as a bundle of attributes reflecting

what he or she is seeking. Thus each brand offers the customers a certain total utility at a

certain price. The consigner will choose the brand that maximiser the value to cost ratio.

The task of understanding customer buying behaviour is enormously complex. Here we will

attempts to present the main concepts and findings it is present here in the course of

answering four questions:

1. what are the major factors influencing the customers buying decisions?(Buying

influence )

2. what is the role played by the type of buying situation?(Buying situation)

3. what sub decisions are involved in the buying decision?(buying process)

4. what is the buying process through which the buyer process(buying process)

Page 47: Ajju Project[1]

In short, customer market is the ultimate market for which economic activities are organized,

it consist of the whole population and it is important for the marketer to research age

distribution, family size, income, education levels, mobility patterns and tastes. The customer

market buys objects that can be classified according to their tangibility and according to how

the customers go about buying them.

The timing of customer purchases it’s influenced by family size, seasonal factors and

economic conditions.

The purchase decision is influenced by various parties playing various roles

(Initior, Influencer, decider, buyer, and user) Behaviors of the customer in the market is of

great importance to the manufactures, distributors and small business etc. because it is this

customer behaviour and his expenditure pattern helps them to exist and expand their business

in the market. The customers are the backbone of the market. Hence it is necessary to know

how the customers will respond to the different offers made by the producers. For this the

customer’s needs, desires and preference and income and expenditure.

BASIC CONCEPT

Today’s customers face or vast array of product and brand choices, prices and suppliers. The

question is how do customers make their choices ?

Customers estimate which offer will deliver the most value. Customer are value-maximizers,

within the bounds of search costs and limited knowledge mobility and income. They form an

expectation of value and art on it. Then they learn whether the offer lived upto the value

expectation and thus affects their perception and their repurchase probability.

Customer value is the bundle of benefits customers expect from a given product or service.

Customer delivered value is the difference between total customer value and total customer

cost.

Customer value consists of things like the product value, services value personnel value and

also the image value.

Customer cost, monetary price first of all, the time cost, wasted, customer will consider the energy cost and psychic cost.

VALUE DELIVERY SYSTEM

Page 48: Ajju Project[1]

The firm also needs to look for competitive advantages beyond its own value chain into the

value chain of its suppliers, distributors and ultimately customers. More companies today are

turning to partnership with the other members of the supply chain to improve the

performance of the customer value-delivery system.

Example : Proctor & Gamble has assigned twenty of its employees to live and work at

Walmart’s headquarters to improve the speed and reduce the cost of supplying Proctor &

Gamble goods to Walmart’s branch stores.

As companies struggle become more competitive, they are turning to practicing more co-

operation. Today companies no longer view their distributors as cost centres or adversaries.

But are trying to work out mutually profitable strategies. In structuring customer value

delivery systems, the new competition is no longer between individual competitors but

between the relative affectiveness of competing value delivery system 48ecognizi by the

competitors. Thus it a company builds a more potent value delivery system 48ecognizi by the

competitors. Thus it a company builds more potent value delivery system then its competitor,

it will win more share and profit in this market place.

Marketing can no longer be thought of as only a selling department but marketing is that it is

responsible for designing and managing a superior value delivery system to reach target

customer segments.

RETAINING CUSTOMERS

Today companies an intent on developing stronger bonds and loyalty with their ultimate

customers. Before the producer did not mind much about perception the customer, he could

lose customer and gain new, but today there is a lot of competition a company has to

perception his customer properly to keep him and to get new ones.

THE COST OF LOST CUSTOMER

Today’s companies need to pay closer attention to their customer defection rate and try to

reduce it. There are four steps – first, company must define and measure its retention rate.

Second, the company must distinguish the various causes of customer attribution and identify

those that can be managed better. Third, the company needs to estimate how much profit it

Page 49: Ajju Project[1]

loses when it loses customers unnecessarily. Fourth, the company needs to figure outs how

much it would cost to reduce the defection rate. As long as the cost is les then the lost profit,

the company should spend that amount.

NEED FOR CUSTOMER RETENTION

Today’s companies are going all out to retain their customers offensive marketing typically

cost more then defensive marketing because it requires much effort and cost to induce

perception customers to switch away from their current suppliers. More companies are

49ecognizing the importance of retaining current customers. According to Reichheld and

Sasser, “Companies are improve profits anywhere from 25% to 85% by reducing customer

defection by 5%.”

WHAT SPECIFIED MARKETING TOOLS A COMPANY CAN USE TO DEVELOP

STRONGER CUSTOMER BONDING AND PERCEPTION

Berry and Parasuraman have distinguished three customer value building approaches. First

relies primarily on adding financial benefits to the customer relationship. Thus Airlines give

frequent flyer award programme, hotels give upgrades to their frequent guest super markets

give patronage refunds and so on. Second, approach is add social benefits as well as financial

benefits. Here company personnel work or increasing their social bonds with customers by

learning their individual needs, wants and individualizing and personalizing their services.

They turn their customers into clients.

Page 50: Ajju Project[1]

II. REVIEW OF JOURNALS

1. The study by Zeithaml et al and our as well also showed that customers assessed

service of the firm on the following five parameters:

1) Tangibles, or the appearance of the physical facilities, equipment, personnel and

communication material

2) Reliability, or the ability to perform the desired service dependably and accurately

3) Responsiveness, or the willingness to help customers and provide prompt service

4) Assurance as measured by the competence of the firm in delivering the promised

service, courtesy extended to customer, the firm’s credibility ( or trustworthiness,

believability and honesty of the service provider)& the extent to which the customer

feels secure.

5) Empathy or the caring, individualized attention that the firm provides to its

customers.

Our research showed that Indian customers perceived reliability, assurance, tangibility,

responsiveness and empathy, in that order, as determining the service quality of the firm.

This is different from Zeithaml’s as their’s showed that reliability, assurance responsiveness,

and empathy were rated higher by customers than tangible dimension of service. Perhaps the

reason is that in India firms have yet to incorporate state- of- the- art technology in their

products and services. They still have a long way to go in terms of improving their

atmospherics and communications. Hence the customer believes that the company should

show higher priority in upgrading its facilities, equipment & communication. Once all firms

are at par on this dimension may be the Indian customer too will be like his or her western

counterpart, placing least weightage on the tangible factor.

Page 51: Ajju Project[1]

2. Oliver, Richard L. (1993a). —A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and

Service Perception : Compatible Goals, Different Concepts,“ Research and

Practice , Vol. 2, Teresa A. Swartz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown

(Eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

The concept of perception can be divided into four categories. First, perception is viewed as a

cognitive concept to be rewarded for the consumers‘ payment. Secondly, it is regarded as an

evaluation on the accord of prior expectation with alternatives of the selection. Third,

perception is defined as an affective response after purchase. Fourth, consumer perception

demonstrates that perception judgments are influenced by both emotional responses and

cognitive disconfirmation. Another approach to define the concept of perception derives from

two factors; `outcome‘ and ”process‘. The former approach emphasizes the results from the

consuming experience. The latter one extended to the notion that perception involves states

that are not limited to mere satiation and can be described as a process. The customer

perception research has been performed, based on two points of view. The first view is the

transaction-specific customer perception, which judges perception by comparing the

performance and expectation of each transaction. The second view is the cumulative

customer perception, which determines perception by the comprehensive evaluation on the

cumulative experience of the specific transaction. From these several points of view,

customer perception with a retail establishment may be viewed as an individual‘s emotional

and cognitive reaction to his or her evaluation of the total set of experiences realized from

patronizing the retailer. The varied customer experiences in connection with retail patronage

may be usefully categorized into two broad types: (1) experiences related to consuming the

products and services obtained from the retailer and (2) experiences related to being in the

store itself and dealing with the organization. Customers derive perception both from the

experiences in the store and use of each product and service purchased from the store.

Page 52: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – IVRESEARCH

METHODOLOGY

Page 53: Ajju Project[1]

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The research approach for this study was conclusive research. Conclusive research is

designed to help executives to choose among various possible alternatives to make a viable

business decision. Further this research on perception was of descriptive type, which is an

offshoot of conclusive research. This research was designed to describe prospect of customer

perception of HLL. This was undertaken and data was collected to find actual perception of

HLL.

The problem for this research was non-operating in nature i.e. special situation

peculiar to particular company's marketing department. The data both primary and secondary

data, the source was one hundred respondents.

For the proper analysis of data simple statistical techniques such as percentage were

use. It helped in making more accurate generalization from the data available. The data,

which was collected from a sample of population, was assumed to be representing entire

population was interest. Demographic factors like age, income and educational background

was used for the classification purpose.

Page 54: Ajju Project[1]

S COPE OF THE STUDY

This study is made to determine the degree of perception felt by the customers of

HLL. To know their attitude towards the problem related to HLL and to understand the

perception or disperception of the customers.

The students are highly benefited as the purpose if this research is to get acquainted

with the practical side of marketing research, in addition to the theoretical studies in course of

the academic year. This research also gives a chance for application and testing of the

theoretical study on the real work situation. The students got the lessons of experience by

meeting various sections of people conducting on interview knowing opinion of people

tabulating interpreting and analyzing the data collected and this will help the researcher in.

future for career building.

The study also provided a great significance to the company find out how much the

customers are satisfied with the product. The suggestions that were given by the customers

are great help to the company to look the real drawback of the product.

The study helps the customers to evaluate the perception level on the product. They

got a chance to suggest for the improvement of the product.

The project is written with an aim to draw forth the intelligence and problem solving

activities within oneself by exposure to real work situation.

Page 55: Ajju Project[1]

TYPES OF STUDY

The study conducted is a conclusive descriptive statistical study. Conclusive because

after conducting the study, the researcher comes to a decision which is precise and rational.

The study is descriptive because it is in the descriptive study, that the data is collected for a

definite purpose and here the purpose is definite i.e. the data is collected, to find out the

perception of the customers with the brand. The study is conclusive because after doing the

study the researcher comes to a conclusion regarding the position of the brand in the minds of

respondents of different age groups. The study is statistical because throughout the study all

the similar samples are selected and grouped together (similarity of ages thus forming a

group). All the similar responses are taken together as one and their percentages are

calculated.

Thus, this, conclusive descriptive statistical study is the best study for this purpose as

it provides the necessary information which is utilized to arrive at a concrete decision.

Page 56: Ajju Project[1]

AREA OF THE STUDY

This study was based on the customer satisfaction of HLL hence I have done the survey of

100 respondents in Bhopal city.

The areas which we have studied are Karod chauraha Nehru nagar Kotra thana Coach factory DIG Super bazaar

PERIOD OF THE STUDY

The period of study was 60 days.

Page 57: Ajju Project[1]

TOOLS OF ANALYSIS

To know the response, I have used the questionnaire method in sample survey. If one

wishes to find what people think or know, the logical procedure is to ask them. This has led

marketing researchers to use the questionnaire technique for collecting data more than any

other method.

In this method questionnaire were distributed to the respondents and they were asked

to answer questions in the questionnaire. The questionnaires were structured non-disguised

questionnaire because the questions, which the questionnaire contained, were arranged in a

specific order besides every question asked was logical for the study; no question can be

termed as irrelevant.

The questionnaire, were non-disguised because the questionnaire were constructed so

that the objective is clear to the respondent. The respondents were aware of the objective.

They knew why they were asked to fill the questionnaire.

Page 58: Ajju Project[1]

SAMPLE DESIGN

Bhopal has a population of approximately 15 lakhs. For carrying out any research or study on

any subject it is very difficult to cover even 10% of the population. Therefore the sample size

has to be decided for a meaningful conclusion. For designing the sample size, it was thought

proper to cover a very small percentage of population in various age groups.

The method used for sample technique was non probability convenience sampling

method. This method was used because it was not known previously as to whether a

particular person will be asked to fill the questionnaire. Convenient sampling is used because

only those people were asked to fill the questionnaires that were easily accessible and

available to the researcher.

Considering the constraints, it was decided to conduct the study based on sample size

of 100 people in specific age groups. Scientific method was not adopted in this study because

of financial constraints and also because of lack of time, also the basic aim of doing the

research was academic, hence most convenient way was selected.

Page 59: Ajju Project[1]

LIMITATIONS OF STUDY

Precautions used in comparative Method: -

1. Physical verification of material of study:

It should also be kept in mind that, unnecessary facts are not collected and only those facts

should be adopted, which is useful in comparative method.

2. Assessing the existing and non-existing factors :

The existing and non-existing factors pertaining to the subject of comparative study should be

noted down. It should not be that only existing factors are taken note of and non-existing

factors are ignored.

3. Deriving Conclusions:

Due care should be taken in drawing conclusions. If the comparison is faulty there is every

chance of arriving at faulty conclusions.

4. Study Reports:

It is necessary to prepare a report of the comparative study. This will enable, the reader to

know the exact nature of the comparative study.

5. Difficulties faced by Research worker:

The comparative method appears to be an easy method of study but actually is very difficult.

No conclusion can be drawn very easily from the data and details collected by this method.

Varied conclusions can be drawn in a study of one and the same group, community and

circumstances and if the groups, communities are different the results are bound to differ.

Page 60: Ajju Project[1]

HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY

H0 - Respondents use HLL Products because of Quality Options No. of Respondents

Quality 18

Price 8

Brand Image 16

Offers 5

Others 3

The above table shows that the hypothesis is approved.

Page 61: Ajju Project[1]

H1 - Brand image of HLL makes the customer to buy HLL products

Options No. of Respondents

Brand Image 18

Brand Loyalty 8

Price 16

Others 8

The above table shows that the above hypothesis is approved.

Page 62: Ajju Project[1]

H2 - Most of the respondents were satisfied with HLL Products

Options No. of Respondents

Highly Satisfied 35

Satisfied 10

Dissatisfied 5

The above table shows that the hypothesis is approved.

Page 63: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – VDATA ANALYSIS

& INTERPRETATION

Page 64: Ajju Project[1]

DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

Q1. How do you come to know about the HLL Products ?

a. Advertisement

b. Friends

c. Colleagues

d. Neighbours

e. Others

TABLE 5.1 : SOURCE OF AWARENESS

Option No. of Respondents

Advertisement 5

Friends 10

Colleagues 6

Neighbours 15

Others 14

Interpretation :

15 respondents come to know about HLL Products through their neighbours, 10 respondents

come to know through their friends.

Page 65: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.1 : SOURCE OF AWARENESS

Page 66: Ajju Project[1]

Q2. Have you seen the advertisement of HLL Products ?

a. Yes

b. No

TABLE 5.2 : AWARENESS OF ADVERTISEMENT

Options No. of Respondents

Yes 35

No 15

Interpretation :

70% of the respondents have seen the advertisement of HLL Products.

Page 67: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.I : ADVERTISEMENT AWARENESS

Page 68: Ajju Project[1]

Q3.Have you seen the advertisement of HLL Products, If yes then in which media :

a. Television

b. Newspaper

c. Magazines

d. Banners / Hoarding

e. Road Show

TABLE 5.3 : BEST MEDIUM OF ADVERTISEMENT

Options No. of Respondents

Television 18

Newspapers 0

Magazines 2

Banners/ Hoarding 15

Road Show 2

Interpretation:

18 respondents have seen the advertisement on Television, 15 on Banners / Hoardings.

Page 69: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – 3 : BEST MEDIUM OF ADVERTISEMENT

Page 70: Ajju Project[1]

Q4. Why you are using the HLL Products ?

a. Quality

b. Price

c. Brand Image

d. Offers

e. Others

TABLE 5.4 : REASON FOR USING HLL PRODUCTS

Options No. of Respondents

Quality 18

Price 8

Brand Image 16

Offers 5

Others 3

Interpretation:

18 respondents are using HLL Products for its quality, 16 respondents are using HLL

Products for its brand image.

Page 71: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.4 : REASON FOR USING HLL PRODUCTS

Page 72: Ajju Project[1]

Q5. What factors do you consider before purchasing these product ?

a. Brand Image

b. Brand Loyalty

c. Price

d. Others

TABLE 5.5 : FACTORS FOR PURCHASING

Options No. of Respondents Percentage

Brand Image 18 36

Brand Loyalty 8 16

Price 16 32

Others 8 16

Interpretation :

36% of the respondents consider Brand Image, 16% of the respondents consider price before

purchasing these products.

Page 73: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.5 : FACTORS FOR PURCHASING

Page 74: Ajju Project[1]

Q6. How did you felt after purchasing it ?

a. Highly satisfied

b. Satisfied

c. Dissatisfied

TABLE 5.6 : SATISFACTION LEVEL

Options No. of Respondents Percentage

Highly Satisfied 35 70

Satisfied 10 20

Dissatisfied 5 10

Interpretation :

70% of the respondents are Highly Satisfied,10 respondents are satisfied, 5% are dissatisfied.

Page 75: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH V.6 : SATISFACTION LEVEL

Page 76: Ajju Project[1]

Q7. According to your perception, what characteristics it has better than other Alternatives

brands available in the market.

a. Brand Image

b. Price

c. Quality

d. Others

TABLE 5.7 : PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

Options No. of Respondents Percentage

Brand Image 5 10

Price 15 30

Quality 20 40

Others 10 20

Interpretation :

40% say its quality is best, 10% say its prices are less.

Page 77: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH V.7 : PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

Page 78: Ajju Project[1]

Q8. Which Brand offers you the value for your money ?

a. HLL

b. P&G

c. Ajanta Health

d. Others

TABLE 5.8 : PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

Options No. of Respondents

Ajanta Health/ Oral Care 8

HLL 16

P&G 12

Others 14

Interpretation :

16 respondents say HLL gives value for money.

Page 79: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.8 : PERCEPTION AS COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS

Page 80: Ajju Project[1]

Q9. Which brand offers you the more attractive schemes ?

a. HLL

b. P&G

c. Ajanta Health/ Oral Care

d. Others

TABLE 5.9 : BRANDS WHICH OFFER ATTRACTIVE SCHEMES

Options No. of Respondents

Ajanta Health/ Oral Care 6

HLL 20

P&G 10

Others 14

Interpretation :

40% respondents HLL brand offers attractive schemes, 28% respondents says others provide

attractive schemes.

Page 81: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH – V.9 : BRANDS WHICH OFFER ATTRACTIVE SCHEMES

Page 82: Ajju Project[1]

Q10 What do you think about the brand image of HLL Products.

a. Excellent

b. Good

c. Average

d. Poor

e. Can’t Say

TABLE 5.10 : BRAND IMAGE OF HLL PRODUCTS

Options No. of Respondents

Excellent 21

Good 10

Average 12

Poor 6

Can’t Say 1

Interpretation :

42% respondents say Brand image of HLL is excellent.

Page 83: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH –V.10 : BRAND IMAGE OF HLL PRODUCTS

Page 84: Ajju Project[1]

Q11. Your suggestions to improve the brands image of HLL Products ?

a. Advertisement

b. Quality

c. Competitive Prices

d. Others

Options No. of Respondents

Advertisement 10

Quality 15

Competitive Prices 16

Others 9

Interpretation :

32% of the respondents say HLL must reduce the prices.

Page 85: Ajju Project[1]

Graph – 11

Page 86: Ajju Project[1]

Q12. Who in your family would decide about purchasing a particular brand?

a. Father

b. Mother

c. Brother

d. Yourself

e. Don’t Know

Options No. of Respondents

Father 10

Mother 15

Brother 2

Yourself 10

Don’t Know 13

Interpretation :

26% respondents don’t give any reason.

Page 87: Ajju Project[1]

GRAPH -12

Page 88: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – VIOBSERVATIONS

&FINDINGS

Page 89: Ajju Project[1]

OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS

This project report is a partial fulfillment of our studies M.B.A has helped me

tremendously in knowing how marketing activities are carried out in a real situation. In

classroom lectures, I was able to understand only the theoretical work I have the practical

experience about the marketing activities.

Marketing is more an art than science. Successful decision making in marketing

depends upon the skills and judgement of the individual involved and cannot be reduced to an

organized body of principles. The decision making mainly depends upon the experience of

the people, but if the manager finds it difficult to make decision on certain points, he make

use of research they are applying the methods of science tot he art of marketing.

As far as my study on marketing on consumer's perception of HLL Products. I feel I

was more on art than a science, although scientific techniques and tools were made use for

the collection of data.

Inspite of some limitations like less samples, less time and finance I could accomplish

my objectives. The analysis of the data collected vividly states that the consumers are

satisfied with the product. As every position has some opposition. The sample feels that this

product also has some problems as nothing is perfect.

Page 90: Ajju Project[1]

CHAPTER – VIICONCLUSIONS

&SUGGESTIONS

Page 91: Ajju Project[1]

CONCLUSION

This quotation is very important for every business organization and every one should

keep in mind this thing.

The route of all companies wishing to survive and prosper into the Millennium should

be ‘onwards and upwards’. Some companies may however have lost the way and

adopted a ‘wait and see’ strategy. Companies most likely to survive increasingly

competitive markets must be flexible, adaptive and prepared to plan for the

future. These factors suggest some key strategic actions which should be taken to

improve business performance and the competitive position of individual firms and

the sector as a whole.

These strategic actions include:

The preparation of a Mission Statement and formal Business, Marketing

and Training Plans for executives.

The establishment of Objectives and Targets and a Monitoring System.

The acquisition of in-depth knowledge about Customers and Competitors.

Further enhancements in relationships with Suppliers.

A review of all business activities which might be outsourced.

The creation and continuous improvements in Customer-Care programmes.

The building of good relationships with customers.

Keeping eye on the activities of competitors action and quickly react on that

action.

Customers are giving a very good response to HLL Products and they are fully

satisfied with the products of HLL

SUGGESTIONS

Page 92: Ajju Project[1]

REPRESENTATIVES

Visit at each and every retail shop.

Regular visits every week should be there.

RESEARCH/ SURVEY

More emphasis on research and survey

Better understanding of market demand

More emphasis on product diversification

No. of new inventions in detergent category should be there.

PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES

Promotional activities for sale should be increased i.e. gift items should be

provided to consumers.

Promotional activities like posters, dangler, and hoardings should be

enhanced.

Hindustan Level Ltd. Have to advertise well their products as the Proctor &

Gamble is doing.

T.V. advertisements should be increased.

Local newspaper advertisement should be there i.e. advertisement in Dainik

Bhaskar, Nav Bharat etc.

Some gift items and gift coupon should be given to the retailer for achieving

maximum sales target of Surf detergent brand.

SERVICES

Service is not so good and fast, so HLL should improve it, like product should

be easily available in each shop.

Damaged product should be taken care of efficiently and seriously.

Page 93: Ajju Project[1]

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Page 94: Ajju Project[1]

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books:-

Kotler, Philip (1996): ‘Marketing Management’ Analysis, Planning,

Implementation &Control. 8th edition, prentice hall of India, New Delhi.

Kothari.C.R. (1994): ‘Research Methodology’ Wishwa prakashan.

Kaynak, E & Savitt.R (1984): ‘Comparative Marketing Systems’. Praegar,

New York.

Neil Wearne& Alison M (1996): ‘Hospitality Marketing’. Butterworth-

Hinmenn Ltd, Oxford.

Page Limited, London.

Zeithaml, V.A (1996): ‘Service Marketing’ McGraw Hill New York.

Websites:

www.google.com

www.hll.com

www.indiainfoline.com

Page 95: Ajju Project[1]

ANNEXURES

Page 96: Ajju Project[1]

QUESTIONNAIRE

Name : ______________________________________________

Address : ______________________________________________

Q1. How do you come to know about the HLL Products ?

f. Advertisement

g. Friends

h. Colleagues

i. Neighbours

j. Others

Q2. Have you seen the advertisement of HLL Products ?

c. Yes

d. No

Q3.Have you seen the advertisement of HLL Products, If yes then in which media :

f. Television

g. Newspaper

h. Magazines

i. Banners / Hoarding

j. Road Show

Q4. Why you are using the HLL Products ?

f. Quality

g. Price

h. Brand Image

i. Offers

j. Others

Page 97: Ajju Project[1]

Q5. What factors do you consider before purchasing these product ?

e. Brand Image

f. Brand Loyalty

g. Price

h. Others

Q6. How did you felt after purchasing it ?

d. Highly satisfied

e. Satisfied

f. Dissatisfied

Q7. According to your perception, what characteristics it has better than other Alternatives

brands available in the market.

e. Brand Image

f. Price

g. Quality

h. Others

Q8. Which Brand offers you the value for your money ?

e. HLL

f. P&G

g. Ajanta Health

h. Others

Q9. Which brand offers you the more attractive schemes ?

e. HLL

f. P&G

g. Ajanta Health/ Oral Care

h. Others

Page 98: Ajju Project[1]

Q10 What do you think about the brand image of HLL Products.

f. Excellent

g. Good

h. Average

i. Poor

j. Can’t Say

Q11. Your suggestions to improve the brands image of HLL Products ?

e. Advertisement

f. Quality

g. Competitive Prices

h. Others

Q12. Who in your family would decide about purchasing a particular brand?

f. Father

g. Mother

h. Brother

i. Yourself

j. Don’t Know

Page 99: Ajju Project[1]

CURRICULUM VITAE

MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA Room no.107,MIM Boy’s Hostel MCEE-MIM, Berasia Road

Lambakheda, Bhopal (M.P)

Mobile No. 9827745860

e-mail:[email protected]

OBJECTIVE

To make a purposeful contribution to the potent field of marketing and to achieve new heights through innovation and creativity

Professional Qualification

Pursuing MBA(III Sem) from Maharishi Centre for Educational Excellence , Maharishi Institute of Management Bhopal, Affiliated to Barakatullah university Bhopal (M.P) Likely to passout in June 2006.

Specialization :

Marketing Management

Educational Qualification

B.S C. from Thakur Ranmant Singh Autonomous College affiliated to A.P.S. University

Rewa (M.P) in the year 2003 and Secure70%.

12th (biology) from C.B.S.E Board, Panna in the year 2000

10th from C.B.S.E Board, Rewa in the year 1998.

Page 100: Ajju Project[1]

Computer Proficiency

MS Office & Working Knowledge of Internet

Project details

I have done my project from HLL & my topic is To Assess the customer percepton towards the product of HLL & service issue in Bhopal city.

PERSONAL DETAILS

Father’s Name : Mr.Shiv Charan lal Shrivastava

Date of Birth : 11th Jan 1983

Sex : Male

Nationality : Indian

Permanent Address : Mr.Pankaj Shrivastava

N.C.C School Ford Road Nipaniya

Distt. - Rewa (M.P.)

Pin-486001

Phone : (07662) 220905

Mobile-9827745860

Hobby : Making New Friends & Watching Criket

Date :

Place : (MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA)

Page 101: Ajju Project[1]