Airport Authority, Certified Airfield Auditors
-
Upload
jackie72 -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
1.231 -
download
0
Transcript of Airport Authority, Certified Airfield Auditors
Safety Management Principles
Training of
Certified Airfield Safety Auditorsby
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University &
Airport Authority Hong Kong
Course OutlineDay 1
Ir. Patrick S.K. Poon Module 1: Safety Management Principles
Mr. Fenkins Chow Module 2: Risk Management Concepts
Day 2
Mr. Lawrence Law Module 3: Local & ICAO Safety Audit Requirement
Mr. Lawrence Law Module 4: Airfield Activities Safety Audit
Day 3
Mr. YK Kam Module 5: Development of safety audit protocols
Mr. YK Kam Module 6: Safety Audit Technique
Day 4
Mr. Law & Kam Fieldwork project (Airfield Audit) presentation
Introduction
Course Objectives:
– A comprehensive understanding of the safety and risk management principles
– A mastery of the safety audit techniques and competence to conduct “safety audits” of the airfield activities
What is safety?
What is safety?
Safety is the state in which the risk of harm to persons or property damage is reduced to, and maintained at or below, an acceptable level through a continuing process of hazard identification and risk management.
-- ICAO (2005)
Historical Development
Safety Perspectives
• Safety is often viewed from different perspectives:
• as an externally-imposed obligation (law)
• as an engineering problem (technology)
• as a psychological problem (people’s belief)
• as a behavioural problem (people’s behaviour)
• as a cultural issue (organization)
The fable of boiled frog
ICAO Purposes
Safety has always been the most important issue in all aviation activities.
This is reflected in the aims and objectives of ICAO as stated in Article 44 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Doc 7300), which charges ICAO with ensuring the safe and orderly growth of international civil aviation throughout the world.
• Safety audits ( 安全稽核 )
• Safety performance monitoring• Safety occurrences
Safety Assurance
Safety Management in Hong Kong
Safety Management in HK
• Legislation on safety management (2002)#• OSH Ordinance, Cap 509 (1997)*• General Duties (1997)*• Liabilities• Safety audits or reviews at regular intervals
# The Regulation provides a legal framework for the implementation of safety management system. It requires certain high-risk industrial undertakings, including construction sites, with a workforce of 50 or more, or a construction project with a contract value of HK$100 million (US$12.8 million) or more, to implement safety management systems of varying complexity. The Regulation also requires these industrial undertakings to conduct safety audits or reviews at regular intervals.
* In 1997, the government enacted the Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance which extended safety and health protection to practically all economic sectors.
Laws related to safety management
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings(Safety Management) Regulation, Cap 59AF– Most sections have come into force, leaving the Part 3 of Schedule 4
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings Ordinance, Cap 59, Section 6A, since 1997:– General duties of a proprietor
• Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, Cap 509, Sections 6 and 7, since 1997:– Employers to ensure safety and health of employees
– Occupier of premises to ensure safety and health …
Safety Audit - a short history
• Sections about registration as safety auditors (his function is to audit existing SMS) commenced on 19 Jun 2000
• Then, most of the sections commenced on 1 April 2002, except Part 3 of Schedule 4
Who are affected
• Proprietor of – factory , shipyard business, electricity industry, town gas / LPG gas
industry, or container handling industry, and withand with– 50 or above workers in a day
• Contractor of construction work with 50 or above workers in a day
• Contractor of construction work with contract value of HK$100 million or higher
ReferencesReferences
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Management) Regulation, Section 2 and Schedule 3
– Develop, implement and maintain a SSafety Management System (SMS) which contains the specified elements
ReferenceReference
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Management) Regulation, Section 8
What shall the “proprietor” do?
What shall the Non-construction Proprietorwith 50 – 99 workers do?
• DDevelop, implement and maintain– an SMS which contains the first 8 elements8 elements (Part 1) (Part 1)
• AAppoint a competent safety review officer to conduct a Safety Review annually
• RRead, countersign and date the Safety Review Report
• DDraw up and submit a plan based on the recommendations
ReferencesReferences
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Management) Regulation, Sections 8, 19 and 22
What shall the Non-construction Proprietorwith > 99 workers do?
• DDevelop, implement and maintain– an SMS which contains the first 1100 elements elements (Parts 1 & 2) (Parts 1 & 2)
• AAppoint a registered safety auditor to conduct a Safety Audit annually
• RRead, countersign and date the Safety Audit Report
• DDraw up and submit a plan based on the recommendations
ReferencesReferences
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Management) Regulation, Sections 8, 13 and 16
General Duties of A Proprietor
• Factories and Industrial Undertaking Ordinance, Section 6A (General duties of a proprietor):
– 1) It shall be the duty of every proprietor of an industrial undertaking to ensure,
– so far as is reasonably practicable,
– the health and safety at work of all persons employed by him at the industrial undertaking
General Duties of A Proprietor
• FIUO, OSH Ordinance, Section 6A(2): – So far as is reasonably practicable to ensure S&H at
work of all employees, 5 elements of duties but not limited to imposed on proprietor under Section 6A(1):
• plant and systems of work
• use, handling, storage or transport
• information, instruction, training and supervision
• means of access and egress
• working environment
Legal Liability
Which of the following is the most important consideration when discharging employer’s general duties?
• Zero risk• 5 elements of general duties• Reasonably practicable
What does reasonably practicable mean?
• A self-regulatory approach• Up to the proprietor’s discretion to design or use
any SMS of international recognized standard or even look to FIU(SM)Reg
• One critical point should be borne in mind is the compliance of reasonably practicable requirement
Edwards Vs National Coal Board [1949]
'Reasonably practicable' is narrower term than 'physically possible' and seems to me to imply that a computation must be made by the owner, in which the quantum or risk is placed on one scale and the sacrifice involved in the measures necessary for averting the risk (whether in money, time or trouble) is placed on the other; and that if it be shown that there is a gross disproportion between them - the risk being insignificant in relation to the sacrifice – the defendants discharge the onus on them. Moreover, this computation falls to be made by the owner at a point of time anterior to the accident.
Likelihood of Likelihood of InjuryInjury Cost of safetyCost of safety
Edwards Vs National Coal Board, 1949Edwards Vs National Coal Board, 1949
Self-regulatory approach:The law will aim at
balancing through reasonably practicable
Liabilities after Accident
• In case your fellow got seriously injured, will you – be shocked, uncomfortable?
– know what to do?
– be busy?
– be sued?
– be blamed?
– be leaving?
– be asked for compensations?
Uninsurable Costs
• Fine of max $500K• Legal fees• Increased insurance premiums• Lost / reduced production• Damage to plant / equipment• Loss of time for other employees• Training of replacement employees• Damage to company’s good will• Loss of business
• Who is responsible for ensuring safety at workplace?
• Safety personnel• Workplace-in-charge
Question
General Duties
• Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, Cap 509, Sections 6 and 7, since 1997:– Employers ( 僱主 ) to ensure safety and health of
employees
– Occupier ( 佔用人 ) of premises to ensure safety and health …
• 5 elements of duties• Non-compliance offence with fine of 200K• Mens rea (intentionally, knowingly, recklessly)
offence with fine of 200K and 6 mths in prison
Note: all charges go to employer
References
• Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, Section 6
General Duties of Employer
Duty of Care applicable to Employee
• Take reasonable care for the health and safety of himself and of other persons
• Co-operate with proprietor, employer
References
• Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Safety Management) Regulation, Section 6B
• Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, Section 8
• Ensure safety and without risks to health of the following:– Premises
– Means of access and egress
– Plant or substances kept
• Non-compliance offence with fine of 200K
• Mens rea (intentionally, knowingly, recklessly) offence with fine of 200K and 6 mths in prison
• Note: all charges go to occupier
References
• Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, Section 7
General Duties of Occupier
Safety Management Principles
What areas does an organization need to manage?It depends on scope and nature of activities, complexity and size but typically:
• product/service realization• customer satisfaction• quality• occupational health and safety• environmental management• security • people issues• finance
Options Considered By ISO
1 2 3 41 2 3 4
Integration or Alignment
OH&S E
CORE
CORE CORE CORE
E OH&S Q
Basic Process Model
INPUT OUTPUT
MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITIES
ENABLERS
= CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
DO
ACT
PLAN
CHECK
Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA)Also commonly known as the Demming wheel, named after W. Edwards Demming, a Quality Management pioneer
• A plan can be to initiate a new process or improve an existing one
• it should be based upon customer needs, and
• resolve to more effectively fulfill the organization’s mission
Plan
Implementing the proposed change on an incremental basis
Do
Review the gathered data to determine if the planned and implemented change has created the quality improvement intended
Check
• Take action, either to implement the change or change variables to see if the process can be made more effective, or
• “Standardize” the new, successful process
Act
• Define the scope of work Missions are translated into work, expectations are set, tasks are identified and prioritized, and
resources are allocated.
• Analyze the hazards Hazards are associated with the work identified, analyzed, and categorized.
• Develop and implement controls Applicable standards and requirements are identified and agreed-upon, controls to
prevent/mitigate hazards are identified, the safety envelope is established, and controls are implemented.
• Perform work within controls Readiness is confirmed and work is performed safely.
• Provide feedback and continuous improvement
5 core safety management functions
Requirements of - ISO 14001
Environmental Policy
Planning
Implementation& Operation
ManagementReview
Checking &Corrective Action
Continual Improvement
OHSAS 18001
This is a specification - a “shall” document that is not a standard
It is certifiable
It is not accredited
All the major certification bodies have adopted it and certification is going ahead world-wide.
Continual Improvement
(Initial Status Review)
OH&S Policy
Planning
Implementation & Operation
Checking & Corrective Action
Management Review
OHSAS 18001
ELEMENTS
Carry out an annual review of causal factors for accidents– Identify disparities in accident rates between
Regions– Update, on a yearly basis, a table of safety
related tasks aimed at improving safety
GLOBAL AVIATION SAFETY PLAN (GASP)
ELEMENTS (cont)• Review and improve existing safety database
systems– Address shortcomings and deficiencies
identified in the Air Navigation field– Introduce improvements to safety identified by
the USOAP– Collaborate with regulatory and industry to
identify additional safety measures
GLOBAL AVIATION SAFETY PLAN (GASP)
In an Ideal World
Safety Management Systems Standards would:
• Be generically applicable world-wide, e.g. ILO/OSH 2001
• Use common terminology
• Use the same definitions for similar terms
• Use a common methodology - where this is possible
• Have a common architecture
• Allow a consistent auditing approach
• Facilitate ease of use for those adopting them
ISO Guide 72 Approach
• Policy
• Planning
• Implementation and Operation
• Performance Assessment
• Improvement
• Management Review
The Need for Integration Guidance
• Reactive to pro-active management
• Standards for OH&S, quality & environmental management - contrast, e.g., risk management, fire and security
• Controversy
• Organizations should in any event now be considering the development of an IMS
Policy
Top management should ensure that the stated policy
a) is appropriate to the organization
b) includes a commitment to comply with all relevant requirements and continually to improve the effectiveness of the management system
c) provides a framework for establishing and reviewing objectives
d) is communicated, where appropriate, and is understood within the organization, and
e) is reviewed for continuing suitability
• Identification of aspects and risks
• Selection of significant aspects to be addressed
• Objectives and targets
• Identification of resources
• Identification of organizational structures, roles, responsibilities and authorities
• Planning of operational control
• Contingency preparedness for foreseeable events
Planning
Key areas of planning that are distinct:
1. The organization should establish a process for identifying those aspects of its operation which need to be controlled and/or improved in order to satisfy the relevant interested party(ies). This includes research and design
Where appropriate, legal requirements should be identified
2. The organization should establish a process for prioritising its aspects, so that those that would have a significant impact are readily identified for control measures where this is appropriate.
3. The organization should establish and maintain a process for identifying and responding to any potential emergency situation. The process should seek to prevent and mitigate the consequences of any occurrence.
Planning
1. Operation
2. Management of Human Resources
3. Management of other resources
4. Documentation and its control
5. Communication
6. Relationship with suppliers/contractors
Implementation and Operation
HSE - 1995
Key issues for the SMS to be effective
• CONTROL - is there an adequate structure?• CO-OPERATION - are there adequate
arrangements? • COMMUNICATIONS - are the arrangements
effective?• COMPETENCE - are the systems and competencies
available?
Clear definition of responsibilities: include in job descriptions
authority and resources
arrangements: accountability
reporting arrangements: clear and unambiguous
where personal appraisal: include IMS performance
Senior managers should demonstrate commitment by active involvement
Structure & Responsibilities
Why SMS succeed?
Case Example
Why SMS succeed?• The OHSMS is directly aimed at managing critical risks • Senior managers or owners/operators practice what they
preach and make decisions to eliminate or reduce hazards.
• Supervisors and employees understand their role in the system and are closely involved in its development and operation.
• The system is commensurate with the risks to be managed and is absolutely tailored to the organization’s requirements.
• The OHSMS is able to withstand, and welcomes, robust questioning and review from everyone involved.
Why SMS fail?
Why SMS fail?• Management support is irregular and inconsistent.• Everyone treats the system as “paper warfare” and follow
procedures to keep the bosses happy regardless of their effectiveness.
• The OHSMS is established in response to external demands and never really “owned” or understood by those subject to it.
• The system is imposed without effective participation by those who have to make it work.
• The effort to build an organization specific system is not made and “off the shelf” solutions are applied that have little relevance to the culture of the workplace.
AA’s OHS Priority
• CEO expects “that safety must always be given the highest priority” and;
• in particular that “managers and supervisors are accountable for the safety practices of employees and safety performance in their area of responsibility”.
Major Considerations
Safety & Health Risk
CommitmentStaff
Participation
Legal Liability Cost-Benefit
Degree of accomplishment in safety performance
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent
Policy, Leadership and Worker Empowerment
Roles, Responsibilities and Accountability
Competence Commensurate with Responsibility
Balanced Priorities and Implementation Planning
Standards and Requirements
Hazard Control and Implementation
Performance Evaluation and Feedback
Highest Level (Scale of 4)
High Level (Scale of 3)
74
55
54
72
53
70
56
Review of SMS
Encouraging results found in following key performance areas:
1. Policy, Leadership and worker empowerment2. Priorities and implementation planning3. Hazard control and implementation
Review of SMS (cont’d)
Safety clearly seen as the first priority. However, relatively weak performance areas in:
1. Roles, responsibilities and accountability2. Competence commensurate with responsibility3. Standards and requirements4. Performance evaluation and feedback
Implications of IPBRM(Integrated Performance-based Risk Management)
• Integrated with other business functions and external environment
• Safety review/audit an essential tool for monitoring safety performance
• Need to– strengthen existing 2-tiered SM structure– strengthen the role of Corp. SM– empower LM and depts. to assume self-regulatory SMS– LM to devise risk control and safety audit/review strategies
for contractors, etc.
Integrated Performance-based Safety Management
• In line with current trends RBSMS could be enhanced by adopting an integrated performance-based approach
• AA could now move into the next continuous improvement phase, following by adopting the recommendations of the current review
• Risk-based strategy can be integrated with a performance enhanced safety management system utilizing :– Safety audits
– Training
– Monitoring task performance
– Performance monitoring tools
System Approach
Integrated Performance-based Risk Management
•Stakeholders•Regulating Agencies/units•Stakeholders•Regulating Agencies/units
The External Environment
Continuous ImprovementIntegrationSafety Management Review
Continuous ImprovementIntegrationSafety Management Review
CommunicationAudit / Review SystemCommunicationAudit / Review System
Evaluation of Performance
OSH PolicyGoals & ObjectivesPerformance StandardsSystem Planning/DevelopmentManual & Procedures
OSH PolicyGoals & ObjectivesPerformance StandardsSystem Planning/DevelopmentManual & Procedures
Formulation
OSH Process
Training SystemHazard Control SystemPrevent / Correct ActionsProcurement / Contractors
Training SystemHazard Control SystemPrevent / Correct ActionsProcurement / Contractors
Implementation / Operations
•OSH Goals & Objectives•Illness & Injury Rates•Workforce Health•Changes in Efficiency•Overall Organization Performance
•OSH Goals & Objectives•Illness & Injury Rates•Workforce Health•Changes in Efficiency•Overall Organization Performance
Safety Management System
Airport Authority
Corporate Safety ManagementManagement Commitment and ResourcesSafety Policy, Goals & Objectives
Safety SectionOSH AdvisorOverall Planning and Performance Monitoring
Corporate Safety ManagementManagement Commitment and ResourcesSafety Policy, Goals & Objectives
Safety SectionOSH AdvisorOverall Planning and Performance Monitoring
Initiation(OSH inputs)
L1 L2 L3
Contractors
Line DepartmentsEmployee Participation
Contractors Contractors
Integrated Performance-based Risk Management
SafetyPerformance(Outputs)
Conclusion
In considering a conclusion to the presentation it became apparent that a closing argument for SMS isn’t needed.
SMS clearly speaks for itself
To managemanage your organisational risksorganisational risks with a resilient risk management system.