Aircraft Design Report

44
AEROSPACE ENGG. , IIT KANPUR Project Report AE-462 Disaster Management & Surveillance Drone Group 6 Pranav Kumar Singh Jatin Mitruka Parveen Kumar 4/25/2014

description

Aircraft course design report

Transcript of Aircraft Design Report

  • AEROSPACE ENGG. , IIT KANPUR

    Project Report AE-462 Disaster Management & Surveillance Drone

    Group 6

    Pranav Kumar Singh

    Jatin Mitruka

    Parveen Kumar

    4/25/2014

  • Table of Contents 1. Introduction: .................................................................................................................................................... 3

    2. Wing Box Configuration:.................................................................................................................................... 4

    3. V-n Diagram with Gust Envelope: ....................................................................................................................... 5

    4. Procedures involved:......................................................................................................................................... 7

    4.1. Material Description: .................................................................................................................................. 7

    4.2 Calculation of Wing Section properties : ....................................................................................................... 7

    4.3 Normal and Chordwise load per unit length Calculation:................................................................................ 8

    4.4 Inertia-Gravity load per unit length Calculation: ............................................................................................ 8

    4.5 Computation of Shear Force and Moment Distribution along span: ................................................................ 8

    4.6 Net Loads at ith Wing Bay : ........................................................................................................................... 8

    4.7 Idealization of Forces:.................................................................................................................................. 9

    4.8 Shear forces and Moments at a Wing Section: .............................................................................................. 9

    4.9 Wing Box Idealization: ............................................................................................................................... 10

    4.10 Normal Stress Computation: .................................................................................................................... 12

    4.11 Shear Stress Computation: ....................................................................................................................... 12

    4.11.1 Shear Stress due to Shear Forces:....................................................................................................... 12

    4.11.2 Shear stress due to Torsion: ............................................................................................................... 12

    4.12 Factor of Safety calculations:.................................................................................................................... 13

    4.13 Crushing Loads: ....................................................................................................................................... 13

    4.14 Buckling of stringers and spars: ................................................................................................................ 13

    4.15 Buckling of panels:................................................................................................................................... 13

    5. Results and Discussion: ................................................................................................................................... 14

    6.Iterations for Weight Reduction:....................................................................................................................... 29

    7. Summary: ....................................................................................................................................................... 30

    Appendix:........................................................................................................................................................... 31

  • 1. Introduction:

    Mission of our project is to design a drone aircraft for Disaster Monitoring and Surveillance Purpose. MQ-9

    Reaper, Global Hawk are used for base calculations. V-n diagram and gust envelope are drawn using details

    given in subsequent sections. Later we calculated Distributed Aerodynamic loads on the points obtained

    along the span of the wing. All details have been described in respective sections.

    Details of our design:

    Range 2000km

    Endurance 30 hrs

    W(Total) 5400 kg

    W(Payload) 1500 kg

    Airfoil NACA 653 618

    Flaps Plain

    Details of wing:

    b (in m) 26

    Sw(in m2) 45

    e 0.9

    0.4

    CD0 0.058

    Details of V-n diagram:

    Cza max 1.22

    Cza min -0.8

    Cz alpha 5.41

    Vcruise 360.89 ft/s

    Vdiving 451.11 ft/s

    Vstall

    positive

    130.14 ft/s

  • 2. Wing Box Configuration:

    A typical wing box of an aircraft consists of spars, ribs, stringers as well as skin covering them.

    As an initial guess for half span of wing (13 m) two spars are situated at c/4 and 3c/4 from the leading edge .

    There are around 20 ribs installed in the half span. Both ribs and spars are made of aluminium. The cutaway

    of Global Hawk was used as baseline for the initial guess of wing box structure. The detailed structure of the

    ribs would be decided later. The aerofoil chosen for the drone is 6-series NACA aerofoil named as

    NACA-653-618. The plots obtained through the data for this aerofoil are given below:

    Figure 1 Variation of Normal force Coefficient with angle of attack

    Figure 2 Variation of Pitching moment Coefficient with angle of attack

  • 3. V-n Diagram with Gust Envelope:

    Figure 3 V-n Diagram with Gust Envelope

    3.1 Steps to complete V-n Diagram :

    Different attributes of the aircraft used in the following procedure are as given in introduction.

    1) Positive Limit Manoeuvring Load Factor (n1) : Calculated using formula

    In diagram line AC represents this limit.

    2) Negative Limit Manoeuvring Load Factor (n2): with negative sign

    This limit is indicate by line BE in the diagram.

    3) Parabolic portion OA where Maximum positive lift coefficient of the airfoil section is the limiting

    factor is obtained using the following relation:

    where, - is in slug/ft3 at sea level

    v Air relative speed in ft/s

    W/S in lb/m2

    Czmax - is maximum value of normal force coefficient.

    Here normal lift coefficient is calculated using following expression:-

    where, CL , CD, Cma are obtained from airfoil data.

    cw and lt are wing chord and distance of tail a.c. from C.G. of aircraft.

  • 4) Parabolic portion OE where Maximum negative lift coefficient of airfoil is the limiting fac tor is

    obtained through following relation:

    where Czmin is maximum value of negative normal force coefficient.

    5) The upper limit of attainable air relative speed marked (also called Dive Speed ) through line BC is

    obtained from the relation:

    6) Point D corresponds to cruise velocity of drone. Points D and C are joined via a straight line.

    3.2 Steps to complete Gust Envelope:

    The normal load factor for drone corresponding to three different kinds of gusts (both positive and negative) are analysed here. All are considered at sea level conditions up to different respective ranges

    of speeds.

    Rough Air Gust ( Speed 66 ft/s ) : It is considered only up to velocity at point A.

    High Speed Gust ( Speed 50 ft/s ) : It is considered only up to cruise velocity.

    Dive Speed Gust ( Speed 25 m/s ) : It is considered only up to dive speed.

    The gust load factor is calculated from:

    Where V is in knots

    Ude in ft/s

    where a= slope of a/c normal force coefficient

  • 4. Procedures involved:

    A body axes coordinate system was chosen for the aircraft to carry on further analysis. The y-

    axis is along the locus of AC of the wing. Since there is no sweep for the wing y-axis is perpendicular to

    upstream velocity. Z- axis is positive upwards while x is positive forward as shown in the Fig

    Figure 4. The body axis representation

    To simplify the analysis wing was divided into 27 wing bays. Thus 28 wing sections were formed starting

    from the root section to tip section. The partition was done to create bays of different lengths at different

    locations along the wing as follows:

    0 5 m - 1 m

    5 10 m - 0.5 m

    10 13 m - 0.25 m

    4.1. Material Description:

    Aluminium alloy 2024-T3 was chosen for present design of wing box. The mechanical properties of the

    material obtained from Ref are as follows:

    Mechanical /Physical Properties

    Value

    Density 2780 kg/m3

    Tensile Yield Strength 345 MPa

    Ultimate Tensile Strength 483 MPa

    Poissons Ratio 0.33

    Shear Modulus 28 GPa

    Modulus of Elasticity 73.1 GPa

    4.2 Calculation of Wing Section properties :

    As we know the wing is tapered so the mass per unit length varies accordingly apart from the

    discontinuities arising because of ribs. A typical wing box structure was designed with 2 spars, 8 longerons

    (up to 9 m along the span) and skin in SolidWorks. General wing box structure for different aircraft designs

    was studied from Ref for this purpose. The cross-sectional characteristics of spars, longerons and skin were

    assumed for the root section. Continuous reduction in area for all the components (except skin) proportional

    to the taper was assumed as observed in the SolidWorks snapshot of the model in Fig. Properties of the wing

    section that were extracted using SolidWorks tools are:

  • Coordinates of centroid of the section ( Since material is uniform it is also the CG for the section).

    Area moment of Inertia (Ixx , Iyy, Ixy ).

    Area of the section.

    4.3 Normal and Chordwise load per unit length Calculation:

    These are obtained via resolution of sectional lift and drag force along the two directions one

    along the chord and other perpendicular to the chord. Former gives chordwise force per unit lenth while

    latter gives normal force per unit length as shown below :

    Here is angle of attack of the wing.

    4.4 Inertia-Gravity load per unit length Calculation:

    An initial design of the wing box was set up by locating spars and longerons at proper places in the

    wing section. Ribs were distributed along the span with some prior assumptions. For half span, starting from

    the root section, first 4 ribs were placed at distance of 0.25 m and the remaining 16 ribs were placed at a

    distance of 0.75 m between them till the tip section. Inertia- gravity load per unit length was calculated using

    following expression:

    where nz is load factor and mi is the mass per unit length at ith station.

    4.5 Computation of Shear Force and Moment Distribution along span:

    We know that lift, drag and pitching moment act about AC of the wing section while the inertia-

    gravity loads act about CG. These loads at each station were computed in initial steps. All these external

    forces give rise to the shear forces ( Vz and Vx ), bending moments ( Mz and Mx ) and torsion ( MT )at each

    section.

    4.6 Net Loads at ith

    Wing Bay :

    A linear variation of loads per unit length (along span) is assumed between stations i and i+1 on the ith

    wing bay. The total load is computed by taking average of load per unit length at 2 stations and mult iplying

    it with width of bay.

    Normal Force :

    Chordwise Force :

    Pitching Moment:

    Inertia-Gravity Load :

  • 4.7 Idealization of Forces:

    This step includes idealization of normal, chordwise and inertia-gravity loads. Here it is assumed

    that net force on ith wing bay acts through a point which of course the centroid of force distribution. Three

    different centroidal locations were computed for each of the three different loads. It was done for each bay

    as a prior step required for computation of shear forces and moments. Locations of the 3 centroid namely A,

    B and C corresponding to normal, chordwise and inertia-gravity loads respectively, were calculated with

    respect to i+1 section for any ith section. The expressions used for this purpose are as follows:

    ),,(

    ),,(

    ),,(

    IGIGIG

    CCC

    NNN

    ZYXC

    ZYXB

    ZYXA

    ii

    IG

    i

    IG

    i

    IG

    i

    IG

    IG

    i

    i

    zIG

    i

    zIG

    IG

    i

    i

    w

    i

    wW

    ii

    w

    i

    w

    i

    w

    i

    w

    N

    IGNWzxx

    i

    i

    w

    i

    wW

    ci

    w

    i

    w

    i

    w

    i

    w

    c

    WXzz

    WXX

    IGWzz

    YdY

    dF

    dY

    dF

    dY

    dF

    dY

    dFY

    Y

    dY

    Fd

    dY

    FdF

    Y

    dY

    dN

    dY

    dNN

    YdY

    dN

    dY

    dN

    dY

    dN

    dY

    dNY

    YFYNYVMM

    Y

    dY

    dC

    dY

    dCC

    YdY

    dC

    dY

    dC

    dY

    dC

    dY

    dCY

    Where

    YCYVMM

    CVV

    FNVV

    ZZ

    ZZ

    Zi

    i

    IGZiiiiii

    i

    iiiiii

    iii

    Ziiii

    3

    21

    2

    2

    3

    21

    2

    3

    21

    ,

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    4.8 Shear forces and Moments at a Wing Section:

    These were calculated at each of the 28 stations set up earlier. The calculations were done starting

    from tip to root i.e. i = 1 denotes station at wing tip while i = 28 refers to wing root. For i= 1 i.e. wing

    tip the shear forces and moments are zero. This is free end boundary condition similar to that in case of

    cantilever beam. The expressions for loads at i+1 station at positive Y face are :

  • ii

    IG

    i

    IG

    i

    IG

    i

    IG

    IG

    acac

    i

    wacac

    i

    w

    i

    IG

    i

    IG

    c

    i

    i

    ac

    i

    ac

    ac

    cWIGNWactt

    YdY

    dF

    dY

    dF

    dY

    dF

    dY

    dFY

    ZZdY

    dCZZ

    dY

    dC

    dY

    dF

    dY

    dFZ

    Y

    dY

    dM

    dY

    dMM

    ZCXFXNMMM

    ZZ

    ZZ

    iiii

    ZZ

    ii

    i

    iIGZiiiii

    3

    21

    222

    3

    1

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    11

    1

    4.9 Wing Box Idealization:

    Wing box was idealized in such a manner that both area and moments of inertia were conserved using

    the procedure given in Ref. Spars were idealized into 6 booms each. It was assumed that whole C.S. area of

    a longeron was concentrated into single boom. The skin segments remaining between the longerons and

    spars were idealized into 2 booms each. Consequently, the portion of wing from root to 9m along span was

    idealized to 48 booms cum webas shown in Fig. The remaining portion extending to tip due to absence of

    longerons was idealized to 40 booms cum web as shown in Fig.

    Coordinates of all the booms, their areas and thickness of we between them is given in following table. For

    the wing section without stringers only corresponding booms are removed from the list while all other

    values remain same.

  • Booms X Y Xcentroid Ycentroid Area Thickness 1 0.066145 0.0918 -1.03733 -0.0196 0.000139 0.00075

    2 0.24685 0.17745 -0.85662 0.06605 0.000139 0.00075 3 0.313 0.2 -0.79047 0.0886 0.000196 0.003

    4 0.3525 0.21 -0.75097 0.0986 7.24E-05 0.00075

    5 0.4605 0.2378 -0.64297 0.1264 7.24E-05 0.00075 6 0.54964 0.25561 -0.55383 0.14421 0.001188 0.01

    7 0.68526 0.27639 -0.41821 0.16499 0.001188 0.01 8 0.7738 0.28738 -0.32967 0.17598 0.000148 0.00164

    9 0.8801 0.29662 -0.22337 0.18522 0.000148 0.00164 10 0.919 0.3 -0.18447 0.1886 0.000196 0.003

    11 0.98197 0.29894 -0.1215 0.18754 0.000238 0.00164

    12 1.15402 0.29606 0.05055 0.18466 0.000238 0.00164 13 1.217 0.295 0.11353 0.1836 0.000196 0.003

    14 1.27955 0.28627 0.17608 0.17487 0.000239 0.00164 15 1.45045 0.26243 0.34698 0.15103 0.000239 0.00164

    16 1.513 0.2537 0.40953 0.1423 0.000196 0.003 17 1.56815 0.24151 0.46468 0.13011 0.000214 0.00164

    18 1.71884 0.2082 0.61537 0.0968 0.000214 0.00164

    19 1.8059 0.1877 0.70243 0.0763 0.00078 0.01 20 1.8931 0.1652 0.78963 0.0538 0.00078 0.01

    21 2.040172 0.15458 0.936702 0.04318 0.000463 0.00164 22 2.35483 0.04142 1.25136 -0.06998 0.000463 0.00164

    23 2.35652 -0.00613 1.25305 -0.11753 0.00043 0.00164 24 2.04648 -0.02287 0.94301 -0.13427 0.00043 0.00164

    25 1.8994 -0.03424 0.79593 -0.14564 0.000805 0.01 26 1.8076 -0.04856 0.70413 -0.15996 0.000805 0.01

    27 1.7195 -0.0624 0.61603 -0.1738 9.8E-05 0.00075

    28 1.5705 -0.08598 0.46703 -0.19738 9.8E-05 0.00075 29 1.516 -0.0946 0.41253 -0.206 0.000196 0.003

    30 1.4528 -0.1023 0.34933 -0.2137 0.000113 0.00075 31 1.2802 -0.1233 0.17673 -0.2347 0.000113 0.00075

    32 1.217 -0.131 0.11353 -0.2424 0.000196 0.003 33 1.1536 -0.1335 0.05013 -0.2449 0.000113 0.00075

    34 0.9804 -0.1404 -0.12307 -0.2518 0.000113 0.00075

    35 0.917 -0.143 -0.18647 -0.2544 0.000196 0.003 36 0.8785 -0.14215 -0.22497 -0.25355 6.83E-05 0.00075

    37 0.7734 -0.13984 -0.33007 -0.25124 6.83E-05 0.00075 38 0.6864 -0.136 -0.41707 -0.2474 0.001152 0.01

    39 0.5536 -0.128 -0.54987 -0.2394 0.001152 0.01 40 0.4646 -0.12056 -0.63887 -0.23196 7.21E-05 0.00075

    41 0.3544 -0.10844 -0.74907 -0.21984 7.21E-05 0.00075

    42 0.314 -0.104 -0.78947 -0.2154 0.000196 0.003 43 0.24764 -0.08202 -0.85583 -0.19342 0.000124 0.00075

    44 0.0663 -0.02198 -1.03717 -0.13338 0.000124 0.00075 45 0.61 0.1801 -0.49347 0.0687 0.001985 0.01

    46 0.61 -0.0491 -0.49347 -0.1605 0.001985 0.01 47 1.8448 0.1297 0.74133 0.0183 0.001094 0.01

    48 1.8448 0.0034 0.74133 -0.108 0.001094 0.01

  • 4.10 Normal Stress Computation:

    Normal stresses at any wing section arise predominantly due to bending moments. This leads to a particular

    portion of wing under compression while other under tension. It is assumed that there is no normal force

    acting on any wing station. Also there are no thermal stresses. The normal stress at any boom is computed

    using following expression. Here x and y are with respect to centroid of the section as shown in Fig.

    4.11 Shear Stress Computation:

    4.11.1 Shear Stress due to Shear Forces:

    Shear stress at any wing section was calculated by initially calculating shear flow in the idealized section

    (procedure given in Ref ).

    Imaginary small cut was made in between booms location (6, 7), (19, 20) and (22, 23).

    Shear flow (q(0)) with open section acted by Vz and Vx (wrt to body axis) is calculated using the

    formulae.

    The remaining part of the shear flow (q(1)) which is constant for a particular cell was calculated by

    solving three equations.

    o The first equation is obtained from equilibrium condition.

    o The remaining equations were obtained from the constraints that the section in rigid in its

    own plane so twist is equal for all of them.

    iix

    iix

    YY

    YX

    XX

    xy

    ii

    AxQ

    AyQ

    I

    QV

    I

    QVqq

    1

    2211432

    3

    2 211221

    1 2121

    1

    21

    )0(1)0(111111

    cellcellwallCELL wallCELL wall t

    dsq

    At

    dsq

    At

    ds

    Aq

    t

    ds

    At

    ds

    Aq

    t

    ds

    At

    ds

    Aq

    4.11.2 Shear stress due to Torsion:

    Torsion generates constant shear flow in each of the cells. Shear flow due to Torsion is calculated by solving

    three equation as in earlier case. The first equation is equilibrium equation while other two are derived

    through constraints similar to above step. Since material is uniform throughout there is no requirement of

    modulus weighted entities.

  • 4.12 Factor of Safety calculations:

    Factor of Safety is a term describing the structural capacity of a system beyond the expected loads or actual

    loads. Essentially, how much stronger the system is than it usually needs to be for an intended load. FOS

    was computed for all the booms at all stations, for critical cases of loading. von Mises yield criterion was

    used for this purpose.

    von Mises stress ( v ) is calculated using following formula for plane stress condition:

    where 1 and 2 are normal stresses and 12 is shear stress for plane stress loading.

    FOS is given by :

    4.13 Crushing Loads:

    Crushing loads on box beams occurs due to curvature developed from bending, which can be ignored for

    solid but not for box beams and hence intermediate ribs are required.

    Firstly change in Aero loads (wCw, Mac)and inertial + gravity loads (F) are calculated using

    formulae

    Linear variation of aerodynamic centre (A.C.) is used between all the stations

    Using the bending moment distribution crushing force (Pcrush) is calculated directly using

    4.14 Buckling of stringers and spars:

    Buckling is characterized by a sudden failure of a structural member subjected to high compressive stress,

    where the actual compressive stress at the point of failure is less than the ultimate compressive stresses that

    the material is capable of withstanding.

    Buckling of stringers due to normal stress considering simply supported at each ribs location is

    calculated

    It is then compared with the critical stress (cr) for the component.

    4.15 Buckling of panels:

    Buckling failure can occur at reduced primary critical stress levels if the structure is subjected to orthogonal

    compressive stresses or high shear stresses.

    Buckling of panels due to force Vy (wrt to body axis) considering simply supported at each ribs

    location is calculated

    Firstly the wing is divided into many rectangular panels (Aspect ratio 3) and some trapezoidal pane l

    Then buckling is calculated on these panels using the maximum normal stress and minimum cross-

    section are present in the panel

    It is then compared with the critical stress (cr) of the material

  • 5. Results and Discussion:

    Wing section properties:

    Figure 5 plots shown for C.G.,Mass per unit

    length and Area Moment of inertia along the

    span location.

    Normal and chordwise load per unit length:

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10x 10

    5

    Span Location (y) (in m )

    Are

    a M

    om

    ent

    of

    Inert

    ia (

    in c

    m4)

    Ixx

    Iyy

    Ixy

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    Span Location (y) (in m )along AC

    Dis

    tance (

    in m

    )

    XCG

    Leading Edge

    Trailing Edge

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Span Location (y)

    Mass/length

    (in

    kg/m

    )

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2000

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    Span Location (y)

    dC

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.4 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 141000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    Span Location (y)

    dN

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.4 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

  • 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    Span Location (y)

    dC

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    Span Location (y)

    dN

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1000

    -900

    -800

    -700

    -600

    -500

    -400

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dC

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-3500

    -3000

    -2500

    -2000

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dN

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    Span Location (y)

    dC

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    5500

    Span Location (y)

    dN

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

  • Figure 6 : Normal and chord force variation along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Span Location (y)

    dN

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-500

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Span Location (y)

    dC

    /dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Inertia-Gravity load per unit length:

    Figure 7: Plot shows the variation of Inertia

    gravity load per unit length with the span locat ion.

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    Span Location (y)

    dF

    IGz/

    dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1800

    -1600

    -1400

    -1200

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dF

    IGz/

    dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-450

    -400

    -350

    -300

    -250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dF

    IGz/

    dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1200

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dF

    IGz/

    dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1000

    -900

    -800

    -700

    -600

    -500

    -400

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    Span Location (y)

    dF

    IGz/

    dy (

    in N

    /m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

  • Shear Force and Moment

    distribution:

    Figure 8: Shear force and Moment distribution

    shown along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

    -12000

    -10000

    -8000

    -6000

    -4000

    -2000

    0

    Span Location (y)

    MT (

    in N

    m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mz

    (in N

    m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3x 10

    5

    Span Location (y)

    Mx

    (in N

    m)

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vz

    (in N

    )

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-8000

    -6000

    -4000

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    Span Location (y)

    Vx

    (in N

    )

    n = 2.13,v = 109.7 m/s

    n = 1.2,v = 38.9 m/s

    n = 1.7,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.62,v = 28 m/s

  • Figure 9: Shear force and Moment distribution

    shown along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mz

    (in N

    m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3x 10

    5

    Span Location (y)

    Mx

    (in N

    m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-8000

    -7000

    -6000

    -5000

    -4000

    -3000

    -2000

    -1000

    0

    Span Location (y)M

    T (

    in N

    m)

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vz

    (in N

    )

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-10000

    -9000

    -8000

    -7000

    -6000

    -5000

    -4000

    -3000

    -2000

    -1000

    0

    Span Location (y)

    Vx

    (in N

    )

    n = 1.6,v = 45 m/s

    n = 1.86,v = 63 m/s

    n = 1.44,v = 42 m/s

  • Figure 10: Shear force and Moment distribution

    shown along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vx

    (in N

    )

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mz

    (in N

    m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-18000

    -16000

    -14000

    -12000

    -10000

    -8000

    -6000

    -4000

    -2000

    0

    Span Location (y)

    MT (

    in N

    m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5x 10

    5

    Span Location (y)

    Mx

    (in N

    m)

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vz

    (in N

    )

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Figure 11: Shear force and Moment

    distribution shown along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-3

    -2.5

    -2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vz

    (in N

    )

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-7

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mz

    (in N

    m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-18

    -16

    -14

    -12

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mx

    (in N

    m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    Span Location (y)

    Vx

    (in N

    )

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1600

    -1400

    -1200

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    Span Location (y)

    MT (

    in N

    m)

    n = -1.27,v = 110 m/s

    n = -1.27,v = 55.1 m/s

    n = -0.125,v = 109.7 m/s

  • Figure 12: Shear force and Moment distribution

    shown along the span location

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mz

    (in N

    m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Mx

    (in N

    m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-3000

    -2500

    -2000

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    Span Location (y)

    MT (

    in N

    m)

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2x 10

    4

    Span Location (y)

    Vz

    (in N

    )

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-5000

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    Span Location (y)

    Vx

    (in N

    )

    n = 0.14,v = 63.9 m/s

    n = 0.7,v = 29.6 m/s

    n = 0.83,v = 32.4 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Normal stress distribution along span:

    Figure 13: Normal stress distribution shown along the span location for booms 26 and 35

    Shear stress distribution along span:

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5x 10

    8

    Span Location (y)

    Norm

    al S

    tress (

    in P

    a)

    Boom no. 26

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3x 10

    8

    Span Location (y)

    Norm

    al S

    tress (

    in P

    a)

    Boom no. 35

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4x 10

    7

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess d

    ue t

    o T

    ors

    ion (

    in P

    a)

    Boom no. 23

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-12

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8x 10

    7

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess d

    ue t

    o s

    hear

    forc

    e(in P

    a)

    Boom no. 23

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Figure 14: Shear stress distribution due to Torsion ,

    shear force and Total are shown along the span

    location for booms 23 and 9

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3x 10

    7

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess d

    ue t

    o T

    ors

    ion (

    in P

    a)

    Boom no. 9

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5x 10

    8

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess T

    ota

    l (in P

    a)

    Boom no. 23

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1x 10

    8

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess d

    ue t

    o s

    hear

    forc

    e(in P

    a)

    Boom no. 9

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5x 10

    8

    Span Location (y)

    Shear

    Str

    ess T

    ota

    l (in P

    a)

    Boom no. 9

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Crushing load variation:

    Figure 15 : Variation of crushing load with span location is shown for 4 different booms 6,7,19,20

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    Span Location (y)

    Cru

    shin

    g load (

    in N

    )Boom no. 20

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    Span Location (y)

    Cru

    shin

    g load (

    in N

    )

    Boom no. 19

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    Span Location (y)

    Cru

    shin

    g load (

    in N

    )

    Boom no. 7

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    Span Location (y)

    Cru

    shin

    g load (

    in N

    )

    Boom no. 6

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Buckling of Panels:

    Figure 16 : Buckling of Panels with station

    location is shown

    Buckling of stringers:

    Figure 17 : Buckling of stringers with station

    location is shown

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 0.29,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    5.5

    6

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 3.19,v = 63.5 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 95

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 0.295,v = 137.5 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 3.19,v = 63.42 m/s

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Span Location (y)

    (Critical str

    ess/N

    orm

    al str

    ess)

    ratio

    n = 3.19,v = 137.5 m/s

  • Factor of safety:

    Figure 18: Factor

    of safety is plotted

    for n= 0.29,

    v=137.5

    Figure 19: Factor

    of safety is plotted

    for n=3.19, v=63.5

    Figure 20: Factor of

    safety is plotted for

    n=3.19,v=137.5

  • Wing Section Properties:

    Plot for mass distribution for wing box along span is shown in Fig5. The kinks at regular distances show

    position of ribs along span. Location of CG for any wing section along span is plotted with respect to locus

    AC ( y = 0 ) in Fig5. Variation of CS moments of inertia for wing box (without ribs) is shown in Fig5. It can

    be observed that Iyy is significantly higher than other two.

    Normal and Chordwise Loads for Critical Loading Conditions:

    The normal and chordwise load per unit length variation along span is plotted in Fig6. Both decrease from

    root to tip. The normal force per unit length is positive or negative depending upon whether load factor is

    positive or negative respectively. While the chord force per unit length doesnt follow such behaviour as it

    can be seen in Fig6. the negative values correspond to the PHAA flight condition in V-n diagram where

    contribution due to lift force dominates over drag force. The reason for this difference is that lift force

    contributes predominantly to normal force in all cases while in case of chord force it depends on the angle of

    attack whether lift or drag force is dominant. High non- linear behaviour towards the tip basically for normal

    force is because of similar behaviour of lift. It is also important to notice that in many case shown in Fig6.

    for chord force, the variation is nearly linear. The reason can be attributed to the dominance of drag force

    contribution and also within that predominance of parasite drag.

    Variation of Inertia-Gravity Loads:

    Inertia gravity loads depend on the load factor and mass per unit length of a wing section. Thus for a

    particular load condition it decreases from root to tip proportionally to the reducing mass per unit length of

    tapered wing. Overlap of the plots can be seen in case of PHAA and PLAA flight conditions from Fig.7

    Variation of Shear Forces and Moments:

    Shear forces and moments increase from tip to root. As a result root section handles highest magnitude of

    internal forces and moments. Shear force along normal (Vz) is positive or negative depending on the

    behaviour of normal force which dominates or the sign of load factor. While for chordwise shear force

    shows different behaviours depending on variation of chord force. In case of PHAA this is negative because

    of dominance of lift component over that of drag. The highest shear forces and moments are obtained at root

    section corresponding to PHAA and PLAA points of the flight envelope. One more point at n = 0.29,

    V=137.5 m/s shows peak load resultants at root. These 3 points were used to further analyse the different

    aspects of the design and are used for plotting as shown in Fig 8, 9, 10 , 11, 12.

    Variation of Normal and Shear stress:

    It is observed that at the root section the magnitude of Normal as well as shear stress is highest. The plots as

    shown in Fig. 13, 14 are made for three different values of n and v namely n= 3.19, v=63.5, n= 3.19,

    v=137.5, n= 0.29, v=137.5 for two booms having no. 23 and 9 in case of shear stress for all the three cases only due to shear force, only due to Torsion and due to both, while in case of Normal stress the plots

    are made for booms having no. 26 and 52, these booms number for both shear as well as normal stress case

    have the most critical values and are selected out of all the 48 booms.

  • Variation of Crushing load:

    Crushing load is plotted for 4 critical booms namely 6, 7, 19, 20 for the three critical n and v values namely

    n= 3.19, v=63.5, n= 3.19, v=137.5, n= 0.29, v=137.5 as shown in Fig 15. There are 4 plots

    corresponding for each boom with all three n values together in each plot. As expected the crushing load

    values decreases from the root to tip and having the maximum value at the root for all the cases. Because of

    the low n value crushing load values for the case n=0.29 is very less compared to the remaining cases.

    Variation of Buckling of Panels:

    It is observed from the graph that the panels for which the value of critical stress/Normal stress is less than 1

    buckles but other panels do not buckle having the ratio greater than 1. The analysis is done for all the three

    critical n values namely n= 3.19, v=63.5, n= 3.19, v=137.5, n= 0.29, v=137.5 as shown in Fig 16.

    Variation of Buckling of stringers:

    It is observed from the graph that the ratio of critical stress/Normal stress is greater than 1 for all the cases

    and hence concludes that none of the stringer buckles. The analysis is done for all the three critical n cases

    as shown in Fig 17.

    Variation of Factor of safety:

    Factor of safety for all the booms at each station was calculated using von Mises criterion. It can be

    observed through the scatter plots given in Fig.18, 19, 20. The two sets of plot show first and last stages of

    iterations done to reduce the weight of wing box structure. Initially FOS was very high for almost all the

    booms along the span. After iterations the weight was significantly reduced basically due to faster tapering

    of spars along the span.

    6.Iterations for Weight Reduction:

    A number of iteration were done to reduce the weight of current wing box design. Some of the steps

    pertaining to the procedure include reduction of skin thickness for some portion of the wing while increasing

    at those locations where we encountered shear failure. Another step included faster tapering of spars along

    the span. This helped to reduce wing weight considerably while maintaining the strength of spars to requisite

    level. Comparisons of wing weight estimated through current design procedure is done with that obtained

    through empirical relation given in literature is as follows.

    Empirical relation estimate for wing weight = 428.89 kg

    Initial Design:

    Wing weight = 701.72 kg

    Percentage difference w.r.t theoretical = 63.6 %

    Improved Design after few Iterations:

    Wing weight = 640 kg

    Percentage difference w.r.t theoretical = 49.2 %

  • 7. Summary:

    Present work is dedicated to understand important techniques and procedures involved in design of aircraft

    wing box. Here the design was specifically done for a UAV aircraft (Drone). The whole work can be

    summarized into following steps:

    Initial Take Off weight estimate, wing design features and aerofoil were directly taken from earlier

    design work.

    V-n Diagram and Gust Load Factor Diagram were drawn according to current mission requirements.

    16 critical points were chosen specifically for further analysis.

    Wing was partitioned into 27 wing bays and hence 28 stations. 20 ribs were placed in a half span of

    the wing.

    Lift and drag per unit length was calculated along the span for the 16 points. Normal and chordwise

    forces were further obtained.

    Wing section properties were obtained using both SolidWorks and MatLab.

    Inertia gravity loads were estimated.

    Wing was idealized with 48 booms for 1st part and 40 for second.

    Shear forces and moments were obtained at the stations.

    Resultant Normal and Shear stresses were computed.

    Critical booms were analysed.

    FOS was plotted for all the booms.

    Wing weight was estimated and compared with the theoretical estimate.

    Iterations were done to reduce the wing weight and finalize the design.

  • Appendix:

    %% Name of each item is mentioned above its part in the code.

    y =

    [0,1,2,3,4,5,5.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,8.5,9,9.5,10,10.25,10.5,10.75,11,11.25,11.5,11.75,12,12.

    25,12.5,12.75,13]; ynew =

    [13,12.75,12.5,12.25,12,11.75,11.5,11.25,11,10.75,10.5,10.25,10,9.5,9,8.5,8,7.5,7,6.5,6

    ,5.5,5,4,3,2,1,0]; S = 45; b = 26; t = 0.4; d = 1.225; %densit W = 5400; ar = 15; e = 0.9; Cd1 = 0.05815; points3D = zeros(48,3,28);

    n = [3.19,3.19,-1.27,-1.27,-

    0.1256,1.61,1.865,1.436,2.1256,1.199,1.705,0.6213,0.135,0.696,0.8338,0.2947]; v =

    [63.425832,137.498328,109.999272,55.065168,109.7219,45.01408,63.8885,42.52112,109.7215,

    38.8559,137.5029,27.96631,63.8885,29.6058,32.3984,137.4989]; CL = [1.55675,0.329,-0.19675,-0.79,-

    0.02425,1.55975,0.8915,1.559125,0.343875,1.559,0.174125,1.55938,0.06138,1.5588,1.55938,

    0.02725]; Cm = [-0.0224,-0.0294,-0.0098,-0.0271, -0.00087,-0.0221,-0.0511,-0.0221,-0.0296,-

    0.0222,-0.017,-0.0221, -0.0075, -0.0222, -0.0221, -0.0053]; alpha = [16.51975806,6.618548387,2.378629032,-2.405645161,

    3.7697,16.54395,11.15484,16.53891,6.7385,16.5379,5.36955,16.5409, 4.4603, 16.5359,

    16.5409, 4.1851];

    Cd = 0;

    den = 2720; c = zeros(1,28); m1 = zeros(1,28); m2 = zeros(1,28);

    x = zeros(1,28);

    L = zeros(1,28); D = zeros(1,28); M = zeros(1,28);

    N = zeros(1,28); C = zeros(1,28);

    dN = zeros(1,27); dC = zeros(1,27);

    dM = zeros(1,27); dF = zeros(1,27);

    F = zeros(1,28); yC = zeros(1,27); Fz = zeros(1,27); Mass = zeros(1,27); dy = zeros(1,27);

    Vx = zeros(1,28); Vz = zeros(1,28);

  • Mz = zeros(1,28); Mx = zeros(1,28); MT = zeros(1,28);

    X = zeros(3,27);

    Y = zeros(3,27); Z = zeros(3,27);

    Ixx = zeros(1,28); Iyy = zeros(1,28); Ixy = zeros(1,28);

    sigmaxx = zeros(48,28);

    for i = 1:27 dy(i) = y(i+1)-y(i); end

    for j = 1

    Vz(1) = 0; Vx(1) = 0; Mz(1) = 0; Mx(1) = 0; MT(1) = 0;

    for i = 1:28

    c(1,i) = (2*S/((1+t)*b))*(1-(2*(1-t)*y(i)/b)); if i < 15 m1(1,i) = (5.1015*0.001175*((c(1,i)/2.47)^2))*den; %skin

    Thickness - 0.02" m2(1,i) = (( 0.008363+0.005134)*((c(1,i)/2.47)^3)+(0.00003*(c(1,i)^2)))*den; else m1(1,i) = (5.1015*0.001175*((c(1,i)/2.47)^2))*den; m2(1,i) = ( ( 0.008363+0.005134)*((c(1,i)/2.47)^3))*den; end F(1,i) = -n(j)*9.8*(m1(1,i)+m2(1,i));

    L(1,i) = (1/2)*(c(i) + (4*S/(pi()*b))*(1-

    (2*y(i)/b)^2)^(1/2))*(CL(j)*(0.5*d*v(j)^2)) ; Cl = L(1,i)/(0.5*d*c(i)*(v(j)^2));

    %Section lift coeff Cd = Cd1 + Cl*CL(j)/(pi()*ar*e); D(1,i) = Cd*(0.5*d*c(i)*(v(j)^2)); M(1,i) = Cm(j)*(0.5*d*(c(i)^2)*(v(j)^2));

    N(i) = L(i)*cosd(alpha(j))+D(i)*sind(alpha(j)); C(i) = D(i)*cosd(alpha(j))-L(i)*sind(alpha(j));

    x(i) = -(1.10347*c(i)/2.47-(c(i)/4));

    if ( c(i) < 9 ) Ixx(i) =

    (((4312.505*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((28798.823+4882.13)*((c(i)/2.47)^5)))*10^(-8); Iyy(i) =

    (((284293.1384*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((434706.159+18393.025)*((c(i)/2.47)^5)))*10^(-8); Ixy(i) = (((19714.5*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((-4123.445-

    350)*((c(i)/2.47)^5)))*10^(-8);

    else Ixx(i) = (((4312.505*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((28798.823)*(((c(i)/2.47)^5))))*10^(-

    8); Iyy(i) =

    (((284293.1384*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((434706.159)*((c(i)/2.47)^5)))*10^(-8); Ixy(i) = (((19714.5*1.6)*((c(i)/2.47)^4))+((-4123.445)*((c(i)/2.47)^5)))*10^(-8);

  • end

    end

    for i = 1:27

    dN(i) = ((N(i)+N(i+1))*dy(i))/2; dC(i) = ((C(i)+C(i+1))*dy(i))/2; dM(i) = ((M(i)+M(i+1))*dy(i))/2; dF(i) = ((F(i)+F(i+1))*dy(i))/2; end % % Mt = 0; % for j = 1:27 % yC(1,j) = (1/2)*(y(j) + y(j+1)); % Fz(1,j) = (1/2)*(y(j+1) - y(j))*(F(1,j)+F(1,j+1)); % Mass(1,j) = (1/2)*(m(j) + m(j+1)); % Mt = Mt + Mass(1,j)*(y(j+1) - y(j)); % end % for i=1:27 Y(1,i) = (1/(N(28-i+1)+N(28-i)))*(N(28-i+1)+2*N(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3);

    % tip to root Y(2,i) = (1/(C(28-i+1)+C(28-i)))*(C(28-i+1)+2*C(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3); Y(3,i) = (1/(F(28-i+1)+F(28-i)))*(F(28-i+1)+2*F(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3);

    X(3,i) = (1/(3*(F(28-i+1)+F(28-i))))*((F(28-i+1)*(2*x(28-i+1)+x(28-i)))+(F(28-

    i)*(2*x(28-i)+x(28-i+1)))); X(1,i) = 0; X(2,i) = 0;

    Z(2,i) = 0; Z(1,i) = 0; end

    for i=1:27 Vz(i+1) = Vz(i)+ dN(28-i)+dF(28-i); % i here

    is from tip to root but earlier i is from root to tip Vx(i+1) = (Vx(i) + dC(28-i)); Mz(i+1) = Mz(i) +Vx(i)*dy(28-i)+dC(28-i)*Y(2,i); Mx(i+1) = (Mx(i) - Vz(i)*dy(28-i)-dN(28-i)*Y(1,i)-dF(28-i)*Y(3,i)); MT(i+1) = MT(i) + dM(28-i)-dF(28-i)*X(3,i); % here

    two terms are zero end

    Point1 = zeros(48,6); Crushload = zeros(4,28);

    %% Calculation of Normal stress and crush load

    for k = 1:48 for i = 1:28 Point1(:,3) = Point(:,3)*c(i)/2.47; Point1(:,4) = Point(:,4)*c(i)/2.47; points3D(:,1,i) = Point1(:,3); points3D(:,2,i) = Point1(:,4); points3D(:,3,i) = y(i); sigmaxx(k, i) = (- ( Mz(28-i+1)*Ixx(i)+ Mx(28-i+1)*Ixy(i) )*(Point1(k,3)) +(

    Mx(28-i+1)*Iyy(i)+ Mz(28-i+1)*Ixy(i))*(Point1(k,4)))/(Ixx(i)*Iyy(i)-Ixy(i)*Ixy(i));

    Crushload(1,i) = (2*0.001*(10^(-9))*sigmaxx(6,i)^2)/(2*Point1(6,4)*73.1); Crushload(2,i) = (2*0.001*(10^(-9))*sigmaxx(7,i)^2)/(2*Point1(7,4)*73.1); Crushload(3,i) = (2*0.001*(10^(-9))*sigmaxx(19,i)^2)/(2*Point1(19,4)*73.1); Crushload(4,i) = (2*0.001*(10^(-9))*sigmaxx(20,i)^2)/(2*Point1(20,4)*73.1);

  • end

    end

    %% Buckling of stringers

    Ixxst = zeros(1,15); Areast = zeros(1,15); lengthst = zeros(1,14);

    for i=1:14 Ixxst(i) = (4.9*((c(i))^4)/((2.47)^4))*10^(-8); Areast(i) = (1.96*((c(i))^2)/((2.47)^2))*10^(-4); lengthst(i) = y(i+1)-y(i);

    end

    lengthst(1) = 0.6998*lengthst(1); lengthst(14) = 1.5*lengthst(14); ratiost = zeros(1,14); sigmacr = zeros(1,14);

    for l= 1:14 sigmacr(l) = (pi()^2*73.1*(10)^9)*Ixxst(l+1)/(Areast(l+1)*lengthst(l)^2); ratiost(l) = sqrt((sigmacr(l)/sigmaxx(18,l))^2); end

    xr = zeros(1,14); xr = y(1:14); figure(1) plot(xr,ratiost(:),'ko-'); XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) YLABEL('(Critical stress/Normal stress) ratio','fontsize',15) h_legend = legend('n = 3.19,v = 63.5 m/s'); set(h_legend,'FontSize',13); set(gca,'fontsize',13)

    %% Calculation of Shear stress separately due to shear force and Torsion

    for r = 1:28 for p=1:44 if (p ~= 3)&&(p ~= 6)&&(p ~= 7)&&(p ~= 10)&&(p ~= 13)&&(p ~= 16)&&(p ~= 19)&&(p

    ~= 20)&&(p ~= 21)&&(p ~= 25)&&(p ~= 26)&&(p ~= 29)&&(p ~= 32)&&(p ~= 35)&&(p ~= 38)&&(p

    ~= 39)&&(p ~= 42) sigmaxx(p,r) = sigmaxx(p,r)/10; end end end

    qo = zeros(52,28); qs1o = zeros(3,28); % down to up qs2o = zeros(3,28);

    ds1 = zeros(14,28); ds2 = zeros(30,28); ds3 = zeros(8,28);

    Aij = zeros(52,28);

    sumcell1 = zeros(14,28); sumcell2 = zeros(30,28); sumcell3 = zeros(8,28);

    sumcellq1 = zeros(14,28);

  • sumcellq2 = zeros(30,28); sumcellq3 = zeros(8,28);

    sumqA = zeros(51,28);

    wall1 = zeros(1,28); wall2 = zeros(1,28); A1 = zeros(1,28); A2 = zeros(1,28); A3 = zeros(1,28);

    Totalq = zeros(52,28); shear = zeros(52,28); Totalq1 = zeros(52,28);

    shear1 = zeros(52,28);

    shearT = zeros(52,28);

    sigma1 = zeros(52,28); sigma2 = zeros(52,28); Tau = zeros(52,28);

    generalstress = zeros(48,28); Factorofsafety = zeros(48,28);

    Q = zeros(3,1); Q1 = zeros(3,1);

    for k=1:28

    Point1(:,3) = Point(:,3)*c(k)/2.47; Point1(:,4) = Point(:,4)*c(k)/2.47;

    for ii = 1:48 if (p ~= 6)&&(p ~= 7)&&(p ~= 19)&&(p ~= 20)&&(p ~= 25)&&(p ~= 26)&&(p ~= 38)&&(p

    ~= 39)&&(p ~= 45)&&(p ~= 46)&&(p ~= 47)&&(p ~= 48) Point1(ii,5) = Point(ii,5)*(c(k)/2.47)^2; else Point1(ii,5) = Point(ii,5)*(c(k)/2.47)^(3); end end Point1(:,1) = Point(:,1)*c(k)/2.47; Point1(:,2) = Point(:,2)*c(k)/2.47; Point1(:,6) = Point(:,6)*c(k)/2.47;

    if k>14 Point1(3,5) = 0; Point1(10,5) = 0; Point1(13,5) = 0; Point1(16,5) = 0; Point1(29,5) = 0; Point1(32,5) = 0; Point1(35,5) = 0; Point1(42,5) = 0; end for i=0:51 if i==0 qo(i+1,k) = 0 + ((Vx(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),3)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Ixx(k)) + ((Vz(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),4)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Iyy(k)); elseif i>0 && i

  • qo(i+1,k) = 0 + ((Vx(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),3)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Ixx(k)) + ((Vz(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),4)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Iyy(k)); elseif i>14 && i44 qo(i+1,k) = qo(i,k) + ((Vx(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),3)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Ixx(k)) + ((Vz(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),4)*Point1(Pointer(i+1),5))/Iyy(k));

    end end

    qs1o(1,k) = qo(12,k) - qo(29,k); qs1o(2,k) = qo(13,k) - qo(28,k) - ((Vx(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(13),3)*Point1(Pointer(13),5))/Ixx(k)) - ((Vz(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(13),4)*Point1(Pointer(13),5))/Iyy(k)); qs1o(3,k) = qo(14,k) - qo(27,k);

    qs2o(1,k) = qo(42,k) - qo(49,k); qs2o(2,k) = qo(43,k) - qo(48,k) - ((Vx(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(43),3)*Point1(Pointer(43),5))/Ixx(k)) - ((Vz(29-

    k)*Point1(Pointer(43),4)*Point1(Pointer(43),5))/Iyy(k)); qs2o(3,k) = qo(44,k) - qo(47,k);

    qo(12,k) = qs1o(1,k); qo(13,k) = qs1o(2,k); qo(14,k) = qs1o(3,k);

    qo(29,k) = qs1o(1,k); qo(28,k) = qs1o(2,k); qo(27,k) = qs1o(3,k);

    qo(42,k) = qs2o(1,k); qo(43,k) = qs2o(2,k); qo(44,k) = qs2o(3,k);

    qo(49,k) = qs2o(1,k); qo(48,k) = qs2o(2,k); qo(47,k) = qs2o(3,k);

    for i=1:52 if i14 && i

  • ds2(30,k) = sqrt((Point1(Pointer(15),2)-Point1(Pointer(i),2))^2 +

    (Point1(Pointer(15),1)- Point1(Pointer(i),1))^2); Aij(44,k) = abs((Point1(Pointer(i),1)*Point1(Pointer(15),2)-

    Point1(Pointer(i),2)*Point1(Pointer(15),1))/2); elseif i>44 && i0 && i15 && i44 sumcell3(i+1-44,k) = sumcell3(i-44,k) + ds3(i-44,k)/Point1(Pointer(i),6); % use 52

    for cell 3, 8 sumcellq3(i+1-44,k) = sumcellq3(i-44,k) + (ds3(i-

    44,k)*qo(i,k))/Point1(Pointer(i),6); sumqA(i+1,k) = sumqA(i,k) + 2*Aij(i,k)*qo(i,k); end end

    A1(k) = 0.173495596*(c(k)^2)/(2.47^2); A2(k) = 0.473302955*(c(k)^2)/(2.47^2); A3(k) = 0.057928*(c(k)^2)/(2.47^2);

    wall1(k) = sumcell1(14,k)-sumcell1(11,k); wall2(k) = sumcell2(30,k)-sumcell2(27,k);

    A11 = sumcell1(14,k)/A1(k) + wall1(k)/A2(k);

  • A12 = -(sumcell2(30,k)/A2(k) + wall1(k)/A1(k)); A13 = wall2(k)/A2(k);

    A21 = sumcell1(14,k)/A1(k); A22 = wall2(k)/A3(k) - wall1(k)/A1(k);

    A23 = -sumcell3(8,k)/A3(k);

    A31 = 2*A1(k); A32 = 2*A2(k); A33 = 2*A3(k);

    C1 = -sumcellq1(14,k)/A1(k) + sumcellq2(30,k)/A2(k); C2 = -sumcellq1(14,k)/A1(k) + sumcellq3(8,k)/A3(k); C3 = -Vz(29-k)*(2.47)/4 - sumqA(52,k);

    D3 = -MT(29-k);

    A = [A11 A12 A13 ; A21 A22 A23 ; A31 A32 A33]; C = [C1 C2 C3]; D = [C1 C2 D3];

    Q = A\transpose(C); Q1 = A\transpose(D);

    for i = 1:52 if i=15 && i=45 Totalq(i,k) = qo(i,k)+ Q(3,1); shear(i,k) = Totalq(i,k)/Point1(Pointer(i),6);

    Totalq1(i,k) = qo(i,k)+ Q1(3,1); shear1(i,k) = Totalq1(i,k)/Point1(Pointer(i),6);

    shearT(i,k) = shear(i,k) + shear1(i,k); end end

    %% Calculation of Factor of safety

    for i=1:52 sigma1(i,k) = sigmaxx(Pointer(i),k)/2 + sqrt((sigmaxx(Pointer(i),k)/2)^2 +

    shear(i,k)^2); sigma2(i,k) = sigmaxx(Pointer(i),k)/2 - sqrt((sigmaxx(Pointer(i),k)/2)^2 +

    shear(i,k)^2); Tau(i,k) = sqrt((sigmaxx(Pointer(i),k)/2)^2 + shear(i,k)^2); end

  • for m = 1:48 generalstress(m,k) = sqrt(sigmaxx(m,k)^2 + 3*(shearT(PointerI(m),k)^2)); Factorofsafety(m,k) = (345*10^6)/generalstress(m,k); end

    end

    %% Plots

    % if j==1 % figure(1) % plot(y,Crushload(1,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Crushing load (in N)','fontsize',15)

    % hold on % figure(2) % plot(y,Crushload(2,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Crushing load (in N)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(3) % plot(y,Crushload(3,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Crushing load (in N)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(4) % plot(y,Crushload(4,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Crushing load (in N)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(5) % plot(y,shear1(25,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Shear Stress due to Torsion (in Pa)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(6) % plot(y,shear1(52,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Shear Stress due to Torsion (in Pa)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(7) % plot(y,shearT(25,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Shear Stress Total (in Pa)','fontsize',15) % hold on % figure(8) % plot(y,shearT(52,:),'o-', 'LineWidth',2); % XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('Shear Stress Total (in Pa)','fontsize',15) % hold on

    % Aluminium alloy 2024-T3, young modulus 73.1 GPa

  • %% Buckling of Panels

    y =

    [0,1,2,3,4,5,5.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,8.5,9,9.5,10,10.25,10.5,10.75,11,11.25,11.5,11.75,12,12.

    25,12.5,12.75,13]; ynew =

    [13,12.75,12.5,12.25,12,11.75,11.5,11.25,11,10.75,10.5,10.25,10,9.5,9,8.5,8,7.5,7,6.5,6

    ,5.5,5,4,3,2,1,0]; S = 45; b = 26; t = 0.4; d = 1.225; %densit W = 5400;

    ar = 15; e = 0.9; Cd1 = 0.05815; points3D = zeros(48,3,28);

    n = [3.19,3.19,-1.27,-1.27,-

    0.1256,1.61,1.865,1.436,2.1256,1.199,1.705,0.6213,0.135,0.696,0.8338,0.2947]; v =

    [63.425832,137.498328,109.999272,55.065168,109.7219,45.01408,63.8885,42.52112,109.7215,

    38.8559,137.5029,27.96631,63.8885,29.6058,32.3984,137.4989]; CL = [1.55675,0.329,-0.19675,-0.79,-

    0.02425,1.55975,0.8915,1.559125,0.343875,1.559,0.174125,1.55938,0.06138,1.5588,1.55938,

    0.02725]; Cm = [-0.0224,-0.0294,-0.0098,-0.0271, -0.00087,-0.0221,-0.0511,-0.0221,-0.0296,-

    0.0222,-0.017,-0.0221, -0.0075, -0.0222, -0.0221, -0.0053]; alpha = [16.51975806,6.618548387,2.378629032,-2.405645161,

    3.7697,16.54395,11.15484,16.53891,6.7385,16.5379,5.36955,16.5409, 4.4603, 16.5359,

    16.5409, 4.1851]; Cd = 0;

    den = 2720; c = zeros(1,28); m = zeros(1,28);

    x = zeros(1,28);

    L = zeros(1,28);

    D = zeros(1,28); M = zeros(1,28);

    N = zeros(1,28); C = zeros(1,28);

    dN = zeros(1,27); dC = zeros(1,27); dM = zeros(1,27);

    dF = zeros(1,27);

    F = zeros(1,28); yC = zeros(1,27); Fz = zeros(1,27); Mass = zeros(1,27); dy = zeros(1,27);

    Vx = zeros(1,28);

    Vz = zeros(1,28);

  • Mz = zeros(1,28); Mx = zeros(1,28); MT = zeros(1,28);

    X = zeros(3,27);

    Y = zeros(3,27); Z = zeros(3,27);

    Ixx = zeros(1,28);

    Iyy = zeros(1,28); Ixy = zeros(1,28);

    sigmaxx = zeros(48,28);

    for i = 1:27 dy(i) = y(i+1)-y(i); end

    for j = 1:16

    Vz(1) = 0; Vx(1) = 0; Mz(1) = 0; Mx(1) = 0; MT(1) = 0;

    for i = 1:28

    c(1,i) = (2*S/((1+t)*b))*(1-(2*(1-t)*y(i)/b)); m(1,i) = (2.0654*0.001*c(1,i)+ ( 0.00139833+0.00044256)*(c(1,i)^2))*den;

    %skin Thickness - 0.02" F(1,i) = -n(j)*9.8*m(1,i);

    L(1,i) = (1/2)*(c(i) + (4*S/(pi()*b))*(1-

    (2*y(i)/b)^2)^(1/2))*(CL(j)*(0.5*d*v(j)^2)) ; Cl = L(1,i)/(0.5*d*c(i)*(v(j)^2));

    %Section lift coeff Cd = Cd1 + Cl*CL(j)/(pi()*ar*e);

    D(1,i) = Cd*(0.5*d*c(i)*(v(j)^2)); M(1,i) = Cm(j)*(0.5*d*(c(i)^2)*(v(j)^2));

    N(i) = L(i)*cosd(alpha(j))+D(i)*sind(alpha(j)); C(i) = D(i)*cosd(alpha(j))-L(i)*sind(alpha(j));

    x(i) = -(1.10347*c(i)/2.47-(c(i)/4));

    if ( c(i) < 9 )

    Ixx(i) = (78097.37183*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); Iyy(i) = (759626.49564*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); Ixy(i) = (22151.37743*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); else Ixx(i) = (73215.24*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); Iyy(i) = (741233.47*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); Ixy(i) = (22401.02*((c(i)*100)^4)/((2.47*100)^4))*10^(-8); end

    end

    for i = 1:27 dN(i) = ((N(i)+N(i+1))*dy(i))/2; dC(i) = ((C(i)+C(i+1))*dy(i))/2; dM(i) = ((M(i)+M(i+1))*dy(i))/2;

  • dF(i) = ((F(i)+F(i+1))*dy(i))/2; end % % Mt = 0; % for j = 1:27

    % yC(1,j) = (1/2)*(y(j) + y(j+1)); % Fz(1,j) = (1/2)*(y(j+1) - y(j))*(F(1,j)+F(1,j+1)); % Mass(1,j) = (1/2)*(m(j) + m(j+1)); % Mt = Mt + Mass(1,j)*(y(j+1) - y(j)); % end % for i=1:27 Y(1,i) = (1/(N(28-i+1)+N(28-i)))*(N(28-i+1)+2*N(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3);

    % tip to root Y(2,i) = (1/(C(28-i+1)+C(28-i)))*(C(28-i+1)+2*C(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3);

    Y(3,i) = (1/(F(28-i+1)+F(28-i)))*(F(28-i+1)+2*F(28-i))*(dy(28-i)/3);

    X(3,i) = (1/(3*(F(28-i+1)+F(28-i))))*((F(28-i+1)*(2*x(28-i+1)+x(28-i)))+(F(28-

    i)*(2*x(28-i)+x(28-i+1)))); X(1,i) = 0; X(2,i) = 0;

    Z(2,i) = 0; Z(1,i) = 0;

    end

    for i=1:27 Vz(i+1) = Vz(i)+ dN(28-i)+dF(28-i); % i here

    is from tip to root but earlier i is from root to tip Vx(i+1) = (Vx(i) + dC(28-i)); Mz(i+1) = Mz(i) +Vx(i)*dy(28-i)+dC(28-i)*Y(2,i); Mx(i+1) = (Mx(i) - Vz(i)*dy(28-i)-dN(28-i)*Y(1,i)-dF(28-i)*Y(3,i)); MT(i+1) = MT(i) + dM(28-i)-dF(28-i)*X(3,i); % here

    two terms are zero end

    Point1 = zeros(48,6);

    for k = 1:48 for i = 1:28 Point1(:,3) = Point(:,3)*c(i)/2.47; Point1(:,4) = Point(:,4)*c(i)/2.47; points3D(:,1,i) = Point1(:,3); points3D(:,2,i) = Point1(:,4); points3D(:,3,i) = y(i);

    sigmaxx(k, i) = (- ( Mz(28-i+1)*Ixx(i)+ Mx(28-i+1)*Ixy(i)

    )*(Point1(k,3)) +( Mx(28-i+1)*Iyy(i)+ Mz(28-i+1)*Ixy(i))*(Point1(k,4)))/(Ixx(i)*Iyy(i)-

    Ixy(i)*Ixy(i)); end

    end

    end

    Ixxst = zeros(1,15); Areast = zeros(1,15);

    lengthst = zeros(1,14);

    for i=1:14 Ixxst(i) = (4.9*((c(i))^4)/((2.47)^4))*10^(-8); Areast(i) = (1.96*((c(i))^2)/((2.47)^2))*10^(-4); lengthst(i) = y(i+1)-y(i);

  • end

    lengthst(1) = 0.6998*lengthst(1); lengthst(14) = 1.5*lengthst(14); ratiost = zeros(1,14);

    sigmacr = zeros(1,14);

    for l= 1:14 sigmacr(l) = (pi()^2*73.1*(10)^9)*Ixxst(l+1)/(Areast(l+1)*lengthst(l)^2); ratiost(l) = sqrt((sigmacr(l)/sigmaxx(18,l))^2); end

    xr = zeros(1,14); xr = y(1:14);

    figure(1) plot(xr,ratiost(:),'ko-'); XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) YLABEL('(Critical stress/Normal stress) ratio','fontsize',15) h_legend = legend('n = 0.295,v = 137.5 m/s'); set(h_legend,'FontSize',13); set(gca,'fontsize',13)

  • %% Calculation of mass distribution and C.G. location

    y =

    [0,1,2,3,4,5,5.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,8.5,9,9.5,10,10.25,10.5,10.75,11,11.25,11.5,11.75,12,12.

    25,12.5,12.75,13];

    ylong = 0:0.05:13; S = 45; b = 26; t = 0.4; n = -1.28; den = 2720; c = zeros(1,261); m1 = zeros(1,261); m2 = zeros(1,261); mtt = zeros(1,261); F = zeros(1,261); yC = zeros(1,260); Fz = zeros(1,260); M1 = zeros(1,260); M2 = zeros(1,260); loc = 1; for i = 1:261 c(1,i) = (2*S/((1+t)*b))*(1-(2*(1-t)*ylong(i)/b)); if i < 15 m1(1,i) = (5.1015*0.001175*((c(1,i)/2.47)^2))*den; %skin

    Thickness - 0.02" m2(1,i) = (( 0.008363+0.005134)*((c(1,i)/2.47)^3)+(0.00003*(c(1,i)^2)))*den; else m1(1,i) = (5.1015*0.001175*((c(1,i)/2.47)^2))*den; m2(1,i) = ( ( 0.008363+0.005134)*((c(1,i)/2.47)^3))*den; end F(1,i) = -n*9.8*(m1(1,i)+m2(1,i)); if ( ylong(i) == yrib(loc)) mtt(i) = (m1(1,i)+m2(1,i)+mlrib(loc)); loc = loc + 1; else mtt(i) = (m1(1,i)+m2(1,i)); end end Mt1 = 0; Mt2 = 0; for j = 1:260

    yC(1,j) = (1/2)*(ylong(j) + ylong(j+1)); Fz(1,j) = (1/2)*(ylong(j+1) - ylong(j))*(F(1,j)+F(1,j+1)); M1(1,j) = (1/2)*(m1(j) + m1(j+1)); M2(1,j) = (1/2)*(m2(j) + m2(j+1)); Mt1 = Mt1 + M1(1,j)*(ylong(j+1) - ylong(j)); Mt2 = Mt2 + M2(1,j)*(ylong(j+1) - ylong(j)); end % plot(y,c); % hold on

    plot(ylong,mtt,'r','LineWidth',2); XLABEL('Span Location (y)','fontsize',15) YLABEL('Mass/length (in kg/m)','fontsize',15) % YLABEL('d(F)IGz/dy (in N/m)','fontsize',15)