AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT HANWHA … Exhibitions and...AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT HANWHA...
Transcript of AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT HANWHA … Exhibitions and...AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT HANWHA...
AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT HANWHA AMMONIUM NITRATE PLANT
1216 BRAYMONT ROAD BOGGABRI NSW
Prepared for: Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Stimson and Baker Planning
Prepared by: Nicolas Israel, Director Reviewed by: Kieran Horkan, Scientific Director
Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Report Date: August 2017 Release Date: 26 August 2017
N A T I O N A L I N T E G R A T E D
NICS
C R E A T I V E
S O L U T I O N S
We Aim to Excel in all Aspects of Business We Speak your Environmental Language
National Integrated Creative Solutions P O Box 150 Seven Hills NSW 1730 AUSTRALIA
Mobile: 0421 776 003 Email: [email protected]
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
2
COPYRIGHT PERMISSION
The copyright for this report and accompanying notes is held by National Integrated Creative
Solutions – ABN 54877348873. Where relevant, the reader shall give acknowledgement of the
source in reference to the material contained therein, and shall not reproduce, modify or supply
(by sale or otherwise) any portion of this report without specific written permission.
National Integrated Creative Solutions will permit this document to be copied in its entirety, or
part thereof, for the sole use of Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd and Stimson & Baker Planning.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
3
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Prepared by: Position: Date:
Nicolas Israel Director 15 May 2017
Reviewed by: Position: Date:
Kieran Horkan Scientific Director 20 May 2017
Approved by: Position: Date:
Nicolas Israel Director 20 May 2017
DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD
Revision Date Description Checked Approved
Rev1 15/06/2017 Draft K Horkan N Israel
Rev1 19/06/2017 Final N Israel N Israel
Rev 2 31/07/17 Final N Israel N Israel
Rev 3 26/08/2017 Final N Israel N Israel
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION
Revision Issue Date Issued To Issued By
Rev1 19/06/2017 Stimson & Baker Planning National Integrated Creative Solutions
Rev2 31/07/2017 Stimson & Baker Planning National Integrated Creative Solutions
Rev3 26/08/2017 Stimson & Baker Planning National Integrated Creative Solutions
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
National Integrated Creative Solutions was commissioned by Stimson and Baker Planning on
behalf of Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd (the proponent) to prepare an Air Quality Impact
Assessment (AQIA) for the proposed activities, including the construction and operation stages
of an Ammonium Nitrate production plant. The proposed location is at the most eastern side of
1216 Braymont Road, Boggabri NSW (Lots 1 & 2 DP1145592).
The land is approximately 357.6 hectares (3,576,000 m2), however only a relatively small portion
of approximately 2.3 ha (23,000m2) of the land is the subject of the development and hence the
AQIA will focus on construction and operation related activities within this portion of the land.
In accordance with Narrabri Local Environmental Plan 2012, the land and obviously the proposed
site is located within the land which is zoned RU1 – Primary Production. The proposed activities
being Chemical Production are prohibited within this zone. However, a planning proposal has
already been submitted to Narrabri Council to re-zone the Eastern part of the site (approximately
36.7 ha) as Heavy Industrial. This part of the site includes the proposed development site.
In this report, we have made an assessment of all potential Air emission sources during both the
construction and operation of the plant to ensure that the surrounding environment is not
adversely impacted on by any activities associated with the proposed development. Our main
focus was on potentially sensitive receptors surrounding the site from all directions bearing in mind
that only rural residential dwelling are present in the vicinity of the site. No industrial or commercial
activities are present in the close proximity of the site. Hence, no industrial or commercial
receptors were considered in the AQIA.
Based on the previous inspections of the site as part of the assessments associated with the
preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), we were able to identify the nearest
potentially sensitive receptors as outlined this report.
Based on our assessment, the findings, conclusions and recommendations are presented in this
document. The assessment has found that the proposed development has no potential impact on
any potentially sensitive residential receptor from air emission perspective.
The proposed operations will satisfy the acceptable air emission levels for all potential
pollutants. Approval is requested.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
5
ABBREVIATIONS & GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AHD Australian Height Datum
Appropriate
Regulatory Authority
(ARA)
Generally, the appropriate regulatory authority is the EPA for
licensed premises and the local council for non-licensed
premises. There are exceptions to this definition as stated in
Clause 6 of the POEO Act.
AS Australian Standard
AWS Automatic Weather Station
BCA Building Code of Australia
BOM Bureau of Meteorology
Council Narrabri Shire Council
CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation
DEC NSW Department of the Environment and Conservation
DECC NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change
EPA NSW Environment Protection Authority
Environment As defined in the POEO Act, "environment" means
components of the earth, including:
(a) land, air and water, and
(b) any layer of the atmosphere, and
(c) any organic or inorganic matter and any living
organism, and
(d) human-made or modified structures and areas,
and includes interacting natural ecosystems that include
components referred to in paragraphs (a)-(c).
Harm As defined in the POEO Act, "harm" to the environment
includes any direct or indirect alteration of the environment
that has the effect of degrading the environment and, without
limiting the generality of the above, includes any act or
omission that results in pollution.
Immediately Promptly and without delay.
Material risk of harm “Material risk of harm to the environment” is defined under
Section 147 of the POEO Act as:
(a) harm to the environment is material if:
(i) It involves actual or potential harm to the health or
safety of human beings or to ecosystems that is
not trivial, or
(ii) It results in actual or potential loss or property
damage of an amount, or amounts in aggregate,
exceeding $10,000 (or such other amount as is
prescribed by the regulations), and
(b) loss includes the reasonable costs and expenses that
would be incurred in taking all reasonable and
practicable measures to prevent, mitigate or make good
harm to the environment.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
6
mg Milligram (g x 10-3)
µg Microgram (g x 10-6)
µm Micrometre or micron (metre x 10-6)
m3
NEPC
Cubic metre
National Environment Protection Council
NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council
NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Services
Occupier As defined under the POEO Act, "occupier" of premises
means the person who has the management or control of the
premises.
OU Odour Units; concentration of odorous mixtures in odour units.
The number of odour units is the concentration of a sample
divided by the odour threshold or the number of dilutions
required for the sample to reach the threshold. This threshold
is equivalent to when 50% of a testing panel correctly detect
an odour
OUV Odour Unit Volumes; odour units are not concentrations but
are a ratio. As such, they may not be used to represent an
odour emission. It is necessary to multiply the source odour
level (OU) by the volume of air emitted per second, to produce
an odour emission rate. Typically odour emission rates may
be expressed as OUV/s (point/volume sources) and OUV/m2/s
(area sources) with units of OU.m3/s and OU.m3/m2/s
respectively.
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic
diameter
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic
diameter
POEO Act Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997
Pollution As defined under the POEO Act, "pollution" means:
(a) water pollution, or
(b) air pollution, or
(c) noise pollution, or
(d) land pollution.
Pollution Incident The Environmental Guidelines: Preparation of pollution
incident response management plans defines a pollution
incident as:
“…an incident or set of circumstances during or as a
consequence of which there is or is likely to be a leak, spill or
other escape or deposit of a substance, as a result of which
pollution has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur. It
includes an incident or set of circumstances in which a
substance has been placed or disposed of on premises, but it
does not include an incident or set of circumstances involving
only the emission of any noise.”
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
7
Premises As defined under the POEO Act, "premises" includes:
(a) a building or structure, or
(b) land or a place (whether enclosed or built on or not),
or
(c) a mobile plant, vehicle, vessel or aircraft.
Prevention of pollution Use of processes, practices, materials or products that avoid,
reduce or control pollution, which may include recycling,
treatment, process changes, control mechanisms, efficient
use of resources and material substitution.
Note: The potential benefits of prevention of pollution include
the reduction of adverse environmental impacts, improved
efficiency and reduced costs.
RMS Roads & Maritime Services
Scheduled activity "scheduled activity" means an activity listed in Schedule 1 of
the POEO Act. Scheduled activities must be licensed under
the POEO Act.
Site Eastern portion of 1216 Braymont Road, Boggabri NSW
Spill kit A set of equipment used to isolate or control an accidental
overflow or release of a substance or material.
TSP Total Suspended Particulate
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
WHO World Health Organisation
Hanwha Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd which is the lease holder of the site
subject to the Development Application. It is referred to in this
document also as the proponent.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
8
CONTENTS PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 12
1.1 Scope of Works 14
1.2 The Proponent 14
2. SITE IDENTIFICATION 15
2.1 Site Location 15
2.2 Site Description 16
2.3 Topography 17
2.4 Existing Development 17
2.5 Land Zoning 18
3. PLANT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 23
3.1 Plant Construction Stage 23
3.2 Plant Operation Stage 24
3.3 Hours of Operation 27
4. SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT 29
4.1 Local Topography 29
4.2 Site Inspections 29
4.3 Photographic Section 29
5. NEAREST POENTIALLY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS 35
6. METEOROLOGY AND LOCAL AIR QUALITY 38
6.1 Local meteorology 38
6.1.1 Data Coverage 38
6.1.6 Building-Wake Effects 45
7. AIR QUALITY CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES 46
7.1 Protection of Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act) 46
7.2 Protection of Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 47
8. AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 49
8.1 Air Emission Impact Modelling 49
8.3 Air Emission Sources for the Construction Stage 49
8.3.1 Air Emission Sources for the Construction Stage 49
8.3.2 Air Emission Factors for the Construction Stage 50
8.4 Air Emission Sources for the Operational Stage 50
9. SUMMARY OF ASSUMPTIONS UTILISED 52
10. AIR DISPERSION MODELLING 53
10.1 Dispersion Model 53
10.2 Results of Dispersion Modelling 53
10.2.1 TSP Results 54
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
9
10.2.1.1 Annual Averaging Period 54
10.2.2 SO2 Results 55
10.2.2.1 1 Hour Averaging Period 55
10.2.2.2 24 Hour Averaging Period 56
10.2.2.3 Annual Averaging Period 57
10.2.3 NO2 Results 58
10.2.3.1 1 Hour Averaging Period 58
10.2.3.2 Annual Averaging Period 59
10.2.4 CO Results 60
10.2.4.1 1 Hour Averaging Period 60
10.2.4.2 8 Hour Averaging Period 61
10.2.5 NH3 Results 62
10.2.5.1 1 Hour Averaging Period 62
10.2.6 HC Results 62
10.2.6.1 1 Hour Averaging Period 62
10.2.6.2 Annual Averaging Period 63
11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65
12. STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL AIR IMPACTS 67
13. LIMITATIONS 68
14. REFERENCES 69
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
10
TABLES PAGE
Table 2-1: Summary of Site Details ..................................................................................... 17
Table 3-1: Phases of the Construction Stage ...................................................................... 23
Table 5-1: Nearest Potentially Sensitive Receptors ............................................................ 35
Table 6-1: Meteorological Files Data Coverage for 2012 ..................................................... 38
Table 6-2: Pasquill-Gifford Stability Class System ............................................................... 39
Table 6-3: Statistical Analysis for Input Meteorological Data File – Boggabri 2012 .............. 43
Table 6-4: Annual Stability Distribution ................................................................................ 44
Table 6-5: Referenced Background PM10 Data – NSW EPA Monitoring Station at Tamworth45
Table 7-1: Impact Assessment Criteria for PM10 and Deposited Dust ................................. 48
Table 7-2: Relevant Limits and Averaging Periods from the Approved Methods for Modelling
and Assessment of Air Pollutants in New South Wales (2017) ..................................... 48
Table 8-1: Point Sources Characteristics ............................................................................. 50
Table 10-1: Estimated Impact Results for TSP, Annual Averaging Period, Scenario 1 ....... 54
Table 10-2: Estimated Impact Results for TSP, Annual Averaging Period, Scenario 2 ....... 54
Table 10-3: Estimated Impact Results for SO2, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ...... 55
Table 10-4: Estimated Impact Results for SO2, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ...... 55
Table 10-5: Estimated Impact Results for SO2, 24 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 .... 56
Table 10-6: Estimated Impact Results for SO2,24 Hour Averaging Period Scenario 2 ....... 56
Table 10-7: Estimated Impact Results for SO2, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ...... 57
Table 10-8: Estimated Impact Results for SO2, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ...... 57
Table 10-9: Estimated Impact Results for NO2, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ...... 58
Table 10-10: Estimated Impact Results for NO2, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 2 .... 58
Table 10-11: Estimated Impact Results for NO2, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 1 .... 59
Table 10-12: Estimated Impact Results for NO2, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 2 .... 59
Table 10-13: Estimated Impact Results for CO, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ..... 60
Table 10-14: Estimated Impact Results for CO, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ..... 60
Table 10-15: Estimated Impact Results for CO, 8 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ..... 61
Table 10-16: Estimated Impact Results for CO, 8 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ..... 61
Table 10-17: Estimated Impact Results for NH3, 1 Hour Averaging Period ........................ 62
Table 10-18: Estimated Impact Results for HC, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ..... 62
Table 10-19: Estimated Impact Results for HC, 1 Hour Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ..... 63
Table 10-20: Estimated Impact Results for HC, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 1 ..... 63
Table 10-21: Estimated Impact Results for HC, Annual Averaging Period – Scenario 2 ..... 64
FIGURES PAGE
Figure 1-1: The Site Layout within the Relevant Portion of Land ......................................... 13
Figure 2-1: Aerial View of the Site in the Local Context ....................................................... 15
Figure 2-2: Aerial View of the Site – Closer View ................................................................ 16
Figure 2-3: Site Location in the Narrabri Shire Council Area ................................................ 19
Figure 2-4: Site location in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production .......................................... 20
Figure 2-5: Site location in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production – Closer View ................... 20
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
11
Figure 2-6: Three-Dimensional View of Terrain of the Region with an Exaggerated Z-Axis (Z-
Axis Increased by Factor of 10) .................................................................................... 22
Figure 5-1: Nearest Potentially Sensitive Receptors ........................................................... 37
Figure 6-1: Annual wind rose (all hours) – Boggabri 2012 ................................................... 41
Figure 6-2: Seasonal all hours wind rose charts – Boggabri 2012 ....................................... 41
Figure 6-3: Wind Speed Frequency ..................................................................................... 42
Figure 6-4: Wind Speed Analysis ........................................................................................ 43
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Proposed Site Layout and Locations of Receptors ........................................ 71
Attachment 2: Air Emission Impact Modelling Isopleths/Contours ....................................... 76
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
12
1. INTRODUCTION
National Integrated Creative Solutions (NICS) was engaged by Stimson & Baker Planning on
behalf of Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd (the proponent) to prepare an Air Quality Impact
Assessment (AQIA) for the proposed activities, including the construction and operation stages
of an Ammonium Nitrate production plant. The proposed location is at the most eastern side of
1216 Braymont Road, Boggabri NSW (Lots 1 & 2 DP1145592) as shown in Figure 1-1.
This report presents a brief description of the existing site and its various activities, including
the surrounding environment, the proposed activities, and an assessment of potential dust
impacts of the proposed development. The assessment has been carried out, as practically
and reasonably possible in accordance with the requirements listed in the document,
“Approved Methods for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW” published
initially by the Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC NSW 2005) and
then by the EPA in January 2017. However, the assessment outlines the air quality
assessment criteria based also on:
The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997
The Protection of the Environment Operations Regulation 2009
Protection of Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2002
Identifying potentially sensitive receptors
Analysing potential air emission generation from the proposed activities
The appropriate control measures to ensure compliance, if needed
It should be noted that due to the fact that the proposed activities, equipment and machinery
used have been previously assessed numerous times by highly qualified environmental
consultants at different sites across NSW, it was considered appropriate to utilise the air
quality-related information obtained from these assessments, where relevant, rather than re-do
the same assessments for the same activities, equipment and machinery. Other air emission
related information used in the assessment was obtained from the equipment manufacturers
and Hanwha’s Engineering Department.
Air emission modelling was undertaken using AERMOD, which is a NSW EPA-approved air
dispersion modelling program. Output from the modelling provides prediction of ground level
odour concentrations at the nearest potentially affected receptors from the subject site, which
are typically rural residential premises
All scenarios including worst case scenario demonstrated clear compliance with current NSW
criteria at all potentially sensitive residential receptors without the need to implement any
additional mitigation measures.
Due to the fact that the closest approved weather monitoring stations were more than 20 km
away from the proposed site, meteorological data was obtained from using the EPA’s approved
TAPM methodology by a very highly experienced company in Victoria called pDs.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
13
Similarly, no local air quality data was available since no industrial or commercial activities, that
are likely to generate similar air pollutants, are in the vicinity of the site nor there is an approved
air monitoring station within 5 km of the proposed site
Figure 1-1: The Site Layout within the Relevant Portion of Land
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
14
1.1 SCOPE OF WORKS
To provide all stakeholders with greater confidence, it was determined that a list of agreed
scope of works for this assessment be outlined clearly at the outset of this document and is
shown below.
1 Review proposed activities associated with both the construction and operation stages,
2 Undertake a site investigation and surrounding properties to get a better understanding
of existing activities in the vicinity of the proposed development site,
3 Undertake research to obtain emissions data that best represents the potential air
emissions from the site,
4 Provide comprehensive and detailed calculations of all required values including air
emission rates,
5 Modelling of the proposed operations of the facility to determine the worst-case potential
air emission impacts at the nearest potentially affected sensitive receptors,
6 An assessment of the predicted levels of air emissions against NSW EPA guidelines,
7 The compilation of a report containing a summary of methods and a statement of the
potential air emission impacts from the proposed development,
8 Provide a statement of potential air emission impacts, as well as recommendations if
necessary.
1.2 THE PROPONENT
The proponent is Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd (Hanwha) which is part of the South Korean Hanwha
Group after it incorporated the Australian LDE Corporation.
Hanwha Corporation was founded in 1952 as Korea Explosives company, quickly becoming the
leader in the South Korean explosives industry. It has since grown into a global manufacturing
and trading company operating in four business areas—explosives, defense, trading, and
machinery.
Hanwha Group, founded in 1952, is one of the Top-Ten business enterprises in South Korea
and a “FORTUNE Global 500” company. Hanwha Group has 56 domestic affiliates and 226
global networks in three major sectors: manufacturing and construction, finance, and services
and leisure.
With more than 60 years track record of industrial leadership, Hanwha’s manufacturing and
construction businesses encompass a broad range of fields from chemicals & materials,
aerospace & mechatronics, total solar energy solutions, and global construction. The finance
network, covering insurance, asset management and securities, is the second largest non-bank
financial group in South Korea. The services and leisure sector offers premium lifestyle
services with retail and resort businesses.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
15
2. SITE IDENTIFICATION
2.1 SITE LOCATION
The site is located at the eastern portion of 1216 Braymont Road in the suburb of Boggabri and
the Local Government area of Narrabri Shire Council (Council) in the State of New South
Wales (NSW). Full details of the site location are provided in Figures 2-1 and 2-2 as well as
Table 2-1. More Specifically, Figure 2-1 presents an aerial view of the site in the local context;
Figures 2-2 presents a closer aerial view of the site where site features can be easily identified
including the trees, farm dam and other features.
Figure 2-1: Aerial View of the Site in the Local Context
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
16
Figure 2-2: Aerial View of the Site – Closer View
2.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located in Boggabri, approximately 30 kilometres north of the centre of
Gunnedah (direct line) or 35 kilometres by road, and in the Narrabri Local Government Area
within the State of New South Wales. The site consists of one (1) Lot; part of Lot 1 DP
1145592. The total area of the lot is approximately 357.6 hectares (or 3,576,000 m2). The
proposed development is located at the eastern side of the existing access road where that
Section of the land is relatively flat, sloping gently towards the South and South West.
Based on Narrabri Shire Council (Council), none of the site is considered to be Environmentally
Significant Land and other than some trees, the site has one (1) farm dam. None of these
trees or the farm dam will be affected by the proposed development. On the contrary, these
existing structures will be preserved and maintained by the proponent in accordance with
current Council requirements. More details about the site characteristics and features are
included in Section 3.
The site is relatively rectangular in shape, and is surrounded by the following properties:
Northern boundary with Lots 1 and 2 DP 1131282,
Western boundary with Private Road (haul road) and then western part of Lot 1 DP
1145592,
Southern Boundary with Lot 4 DP 1015797 and Lot 5 DP 1145592, and
Eastern boundary with Lot 121 DP 834141.
A summary of site details are provided in Table 2-1.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
17
Table 2-1: Summary of Site Details
Location 1216 Braymont Road, Boggabri NSW – part of Lot 1 DP 1145592
Approximate Total Land Dimensions
Northern Boundary: 1001 m Eastern Boundary: 450 m Southern Boundary: 893 m Western Boundary: 420 m
Approximate Total
Land Area
Approximately 357.6 hectares or 3,576,000 m2
Approximate Total
Site Area (leased
Area)
36.7 hectares or 367,000 m2
Approximate Total Area Subject to the study
Approximately 2.3 hectares or 23,000 m2
Grid Reference
(GDA94 – MGA56)
(Geographic)
Middle of proposed development site (middle of plant)
Easting = 229899, Northing = 6598361, Elevation= 257 m
Latitude = -30.717019 Longitude = 150.179559 Elevation = 257 m
Local Government
Area Narrabri Shire Council
Existing Land Use
The environment of the site and surrounding properties is modified
rural, consisting of cropping & grazing and some rural dwellings &
sheds
Current Zoning RU1 – Primary Production
Proposed Zoning IN2 – Heavy Industry
Proposed
Development
The establishment of an Ammonium Nitrate manufacturing plant and
associated structures
2.3 TOPOGRAPHY
A comprehensive topographical survey was undertaken for the site. The survey included all site
features visible to the surveyor such as the dam and trees in the vicinity of the proposed
development area, the natural surface levels and contours. The survey also included measuring
the accurate dimensions of the site boundaries. A copy of the site survey was included in the EIS.
Generally speaking, the site is very flat with a gentle slope from North and North East to South and
South West.
2.4 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
Currently, there are no developments (other than rural residential) on the site and no activities
undertaken other than normal cropping and grazing in addition to maintenance of existing
grassed areas. In addition, there is a farm dam that appears to be man-made.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
18
There will be a change to the existing use of the site from rural residential to industrial, but we
believe that this will bring an improvement in the presentation/aesthetics and safety of people,
especially when the accessible areas are upgraded to a higher standard.
2.5 LAND ZONING
As previously stated, the subject site is also known as part of Lot 1 DP 1145592 which is
approximately 36.7 Hectares in area and is currently zoned as RU1 – Primary Production under
Narrabri Local Environmental Plan 2012 (NLEP 2012). The objectives of that zone, the
activities permitted with or without Consent and those that are prohibited, are included below
and referred to in Section 5 of this document.
Zone RU1 Primary Production
1 Objectives of zone
To encourage sustainable primary industry production by maintaining and enhancing
the natural resource base.
To encourage diversity in primary industry enterprises and systems appropriate for the
area.
To minimise the fragmentation and alienation of resource lands.
To minimise conflict between land uses within this zone and land uses within adjoining
zones.
To allow for non-agricultural land uses that will not restrict the use of other land for agricultural purposes.
2 Permitted without consent
Building identification signs; Environmental protection works; Extensive agriculture; Farm buildings; Forestry; Home occupations; Intensive plant agriculture; Roads
.
3 Permitted with consent
Air transport facilities; Airstrips; Animal boarding or training establishments;
Aquaculture; Bed and breakfast accommodation; Boat launching ramps; Boat sheds;
Camping grounds; Cellar door premises; Cemeteries; Community facilities; Depots;
Dual occupancies; Dwelling houses; Environmental facilities; Extractive industries; Farm
stay accommodation; Flood mitigation works; Freight transport facilities; Helipads;
Home businesses; Home industries; Information and education facilities; Intensive
livestock agriculture; Landscaping material supplies; Open cut mining; Plant nurseries;
Recreation areas; Recreation facilities (major); Recreation facilities (outdoor); Research
stations; Roadside stalls; Rural industries; Rural workers' dwellings; Signage; Turf
farming; Water recreation structures; Water supply systems
4 Prohibited
Any development not specified in item 2 or 3.
Figure 2-3 presents the location of the site in the Narrabri Shire Council Area to provide the
reviewer with a better understanding of its location in Council context.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
19
Figure 2-4 presents the location of the site in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production as depicted in
zoning maps included in the NLEP 2012.
Figure 2-5 presents a closer view of the location of the site in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production
as depicted in zoning maps included in the NLEP 2012.
Figure 2-3: Site Location in the Narrabri Shire Council Area
Site
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
20
Figure 2-4: Site location in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production
Figure 2-5: Site location in the RU1 Zone – Primary Production – Closer View
Site
Site
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
21
2.6 LOCAL TERRAIN AND STRUCTURAL EFFECTS ON DISPERSION
The meteorological condition known as katabatic flow (or katabatic drift) is often identified as
the condition under which maximum environmental impacts from primarily ground-based
sources are likely to occur. Katabatic flow is simply the movement of cold air down a slope,
generally under stable atmospheric conditions. Under such circumstances, dispersion of
airborne pollutants is generally slow and the associated impacts can reach their peak.
Katabatic flow is unlikely to affect emissions from the subject site, as the terrain is relatively flat
with a lack of significant nearby slopes.
A three-dimensional view of the site has been provided as Figure 2-6, showing the location of
the site. This figure shows the terrain with the z-axis (i.e. vertical axis) exaggerated by a factor
of 10 (i.e. a given distance on the x-axis or y-axis appears ten times as great on the z-axis) in
order to provide a clearer description of the topography. A coloured scale bar shows
elevations corresponding to the colours used in the figures. It should be noted that this figure is
an approximation of the actual terrain, based on terrain information obtained from satellite
imagery.
.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
22
Figure 2-6: Three-Dimensional View of Terrain of the Region with an Exaggerated Z-Axis (Z-
Axis Increased by Factor of 10)
Site
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
23
3. PLANT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
This section presents information on the proposed activities associated with the construction and
operation of the Ammonium Nitrate production plant.
3.1 PLANT CONSTRUCTION STAGE
Based on our extensive experience with similar construction activities, we believe that the five
(5) construction phases included in Table 3-1 are very representative of what is likely to occur
on site during the construction stage. The equipment included in Column 4 is also very
representative of what is likely to be used during each of the five (5) phases of the construction
stage. Table 3-1 includes the phases, approximate timelines and equipment for the
construction stage.
Due to the flat nature of the proposed site, it is anticipated that the construction stage will
include minor earthworks that are limited to re-contouring and levelling of the site (less than
300mm). These activities are unlikely to generate any dust emissions that could be measurable
outside the boundaries of the site provided that the construction company implements the
minimal dust mitigation measures that are normally implemented on any similar activity with
minor soil disturbance activities.
Table 3-1: Phases of the Construction Stage
Phase/Scenario Time of the
day
Approximate Timeline (Weeks)
Noise Sources for Worst 15-minute Period
1. All operations including truck movements
Standard hours
1–4
Light vehicles
Hand tools
Backhoe
Flatbed truck
2. Civil Works Standard
hours 4–18
Bulldozer
Backhoe
Excavator 30T
Truck
Concrete truck
Concrete pump truck
Small truck
Hand tools
3. Tanks, pumps other equipment installation
Standard hours
18–34
Truck
Low loader
Mobile crane
Welders
4. Connections of pumps, piping and safety equipment
Standard hours
34–42
Light vehicles
Hand tools
Welders
5. Testing and commissioning
Standard hours
42–48 Light vehicles
Hand tools
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
24
3.2 PLANT OPERATION STAGE
The plant operation consists of several phases (also called nodes) and processes as outlined
below. The proposed site is shown in Figure 3-1.
Node Description
Node 1
Water unloading and StorageTanks TK-901, TK-902, TK-903, TK-904.
All water for the site will be purchased and brought in to the site by tankers and transferred to
the water holding tanks.
Water will be pumped and plumbed to the various water systems throughout the plant via 4 x
25 kL storage tanks (plant systems) and 1 x 25 kL storage tanks (cooling tower).
Water systems include:
1. Domestics supply to offices and crib rooms.
2. Various hose points (as required),
3. Boiler supply, steam system,
4. Cooling tower/heat exchanger,
5. Process/manufacturing water,
6. Eye wash stations and safety showers.
Node 2
Water Tank TK-905 to Cooling Tower and Safety Showers.
The Water Tank TK-905 has a capacity of 25 kL.
The cooling tower system will be integrated to the completed emulsion pipework.
This system will be able to draw water from the main water storage tanks into its own dedicated
and closed water system.
The water will be treated or conditioned as required to maintain a safe and uncontaminated
water source.
This water will not be used for any other purpose within the plant.
Node 3
Diesel unloading and Storage Tank TK-601 and Diesel Day Tank TK-602.
The site facility will consist of one 30 kL self-bunded storage tank, which will be connected as a
feed for the steam boiler and generator.
The diesel will be unloaded into the storage tank using the diesel tank truck pump.
Node 4
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
25
Mineral Oil Unloading and Storage Tanks TK-401, TK-402.
The site facility will consist of 1 x 68.8 kL and 1 x 73.86 storage tanks, which will be connected
to the Fuel Blend manufacture as a feed through the centrifugal Pump P-402.
The mineral oil will be unloaded into the storage tanks using a permanently installed pump P-
401.
Node 5
Emulsifier Storage TK-403 and TK-404 and transfer to blend tank Emulsifier will be delivered in
Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBC).
These IBCs will be unloaded and stored in a semi-bunded area with a capacity to store 50
IBC’s under a roof.
The loading point for the emulsifier and mineral oil will be contained in a bunded area for the
capturing of any spills during the blending process.
Node 6
Emulsifier / Mineral Oil Blend (Fuel Blend) Tank TK-405 Mineral oil and Emulsifier will be drawn
in the correct amounts into the fuel blend tank via pumps.
The fuel blend tank has a 5 kL capacity and is controlled by Programmable Logic Controller
(PLC) mounted on load cells.
The fuel blend tank will have a stirrer to combine the emulsifier and mineral oil correctly to the
desired mix. Once the correct batch make up has been blended, a transfer pump P-404 will
move the fuel blend to the manufacturing skid for use in the emulsion manufacturing phase.
Node 7
ANSOL Unloading and Storage TK-201 to TK-206.
There are 6 x 24 kL iso tanks plumbed to a process pump and load in pump.
All ANsol tanks will be on load cells for stock control, and process management of contents.
(QA/QC) ANsol will be sourced from Kooragang Island (Orica) manufacturing plant (hot 90%
ANsol) and be delivered to site by solution tankers. (450 kms)
All tanks will be temperature regulated by the steam boiler system to control the temperature of
the contents.
All tanks will be located on a concrete pad and contained within a concrete bund to control any
spills.
The loading point for the AN Solution will be sealed concrete area for capturing of any spills
during connection, disconnection and loading.
The storage tanks will hold the inventory of the delivery vehicle.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
26
Node 8
Calcium Nitrite (CN) Solid Loading to Hopper and Augers.
A large shed adjacent to the manufacturing shed/skid will be constructed to store the CN bulka
bags. The shed will have capacity to store up to 416 bulka bags (500 t) stacked up to 3 tiers
high. Large access roller doors will provide adequate access for forklift operations to move and
manage stock rotation and usage.
Node 9
Meltdown Tanks TK-301 and TK-302 CN will be delivered to site in Bulka bags which will be
emptied into the CN hopper for inclusion into the ANSOL/CN melt tanks to create the correct
AN/CN solution.
ANSOL will be drawn by a pump into the AN/CN melt tanks. Steam will be used to maintain the
correct melt temperature, and the tanks will be mounted on load cells. The process is again
controlled by PLC panels. Once the correct AN/CN solution has been reached, transfer pumps
will move the solution into the emulsion batching tanks in the manufacturing skid along with fuel
blend and the emulsification pump to produce the final emulsion batch.
Node 10
Emulsifier Oil to Emulsifier Oil Tank TK-305
Node 11
Blend Tanks TK-303/TK-304, Pump P-301.
The process manufacturing skid is capable of drawing and mixing the correct LDE emulsion
formulation with AN/CN sol, fuel blend, steam, and emulsification pump to deliver the required
product. All process on the manufacturing skid is controlled by PLC integrated systems, with air
actuated valves, piping, and pumps.
Node 12
ANE Transfer to Storage through the heat exchanger HE-101.
Once the correct emulsion is produced in the batch/blend tanks TK-303/TK-304, the emulsion
is transferred via a pump and heat exchanger to the emulsion storage tanks ready for transport
to customer sites. The heat exchanger and associated cooling tower system will be integrated
to the completed emulsion pipework and be located between the manufacturing emulsion batch
tanks and the Emulsion storage tanks. This system will be used to reduce the ambient
temperature of the completed emulsion from the manufacturing skid from 70+ degrees Celsius
down to 55 degrees Celsius. This system will be able to draw water from the main water
storage tanks into its own dedicated and closed water system.
Node 13
Emulsion Storage Tanks TK-301/ TK-302/ TK303 2 x 55 kL (or 2 x 88 t) vertical tanks will be
used to store the completed emulsion.
The tanks will have high level alarms and trips so as to limit total storage in each tank, to
remain under the Major Hazard Facilities (MHF) limitations. The three storage tanks will be
located adjacent to the manufacturing skid and the weighbridge. A series of dedicated valves,
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
27
pipes and pump will be used to transfer the emulsion from the manufacturing skid to the
emulsion storage tanks, and separate series of valve, pipes and pump to load the emulsions
tankers from the storage tanks for outgoing loads to customers.
3.3 HOURS OF OPERATION
Under normal circumstances, the hours of operations are outlined below. However, these hours
may not be covered fully at the beginning as they will depend on demand with some periods
when activity is limited to the occasional loading of trucks. The proposed hours of operation
are:
Monday to Friday 6:00am - 6.00pm
Saturday No work
Sunday No work
Public holidays No work
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
28
Proposed Site Layout
Generator
6xANSOL Tanks
Heat Exchanger
Meltdown Stack
Boiler
A
B c
D
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
29
4. SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT
Land use in the surrounding area comprises of a mix of agricultural, rural and rural residential
development set within a rural landscape. Prominent rural land uses in the surrounding area
include a farm dams, several rural sheds and rural activities.
Rural residential development is the dominant land use in the surrounding area to the north,
east, south and west. The nearest residential dwelling to the development area is
approximately 1180m to the south west of the site (within Lot 4 DP 1145592). The site is
accessed from a privately owned haul road.
4.1 LOCAL TOPOGRAPHY
Based on the Aerial views obtained from Google Earth and SixMaps in addition to the
topographical survey previously mentioned, the proposed development area within the site is
reasonably flat except for the farm dam. A copy of the survey was included in the EIS.
4.2 SITE INSPECTIONS
During the preparation of the EIS and this AQIA, several site inspections were undertaken to
ensure that any assessment undertaken accurately reflected the current status of the site and
the surrounding environment. During our most recent inspection on 27 February 2017, we also
walked along both sides of the Private Road as well as Hoad Road for approximately 1km of
either sides of the subject land to ensure that several neighbouring properties located in the
vicinity of the site were briefly visited. This is extremely important in some cases where some
unapproved activities may generate offensive air emissions (or noise) including odour which
may have the potential of altering the cumulative impact on neighbouring residential receptors.
The site inspections confirmed also the previously stated surrounding environment of being
mainly of a rural residential nature with some minor agricultural activities and a few grazing
sheep here and there.
The driveway is mainly made of compacted road base and sandstone and is regularly
maintained since it is being used constantly by the owners. No major irregularities exist within
the driveway as a small sedan car as well as a relatively large truck can use the driveway
comfortably.
There is no evidence of any previous industrial or commercial activities (approved or not) within
the boundaries of the site.
The existing farm dam appears to be well maintained by the current occupier.
4.3 PHOTOGRAPHIC SECTION
Several photos were taken during the site inspections to provide the reader with a better
understanding of some of the site features. These photos are included below.
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
30
Photo 1: Proposed Entry/Exit Point at the site
Photo 2: Proposed Driveway viewed from the Private Access Road
Hanwha Australia Pty Ltd Report No: NICS-173003-AQIA Rev3.docx Air Quality Impact Assessment August 2017
31
Photo 3: View of the Site looking East
Photo 4: View of the Site looking North