Aidan Stennett and Katrina Walsh Fracking · 2014-12-12 · Fracking NIAR 774-11 ... increased...
Transcript of Aidan Stennett and Katrina Walsh Fracking · 2014-12-12 · Fracking NIAR 774-11 ... increased...
Research and Information Service Research Paper
Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to
discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however,
welcome written evidence that relate to our papers and these should be sent to the Research and Information Service,
Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected]
9 November 2011
Aidan Stennett and Katrina Walsh
Fracking
NIAR 774-11
This research paper sets out what the process of hydraulic fracturing, or ‘fracking’ as
it is more commonly known, involves. It also identifies how the practice is used in
other countries and what the potential impact of its use in Northern Ireland could be.
Some key concerns around ‘fracking’ are also considered.
Paper XX/XX 09 November 2010
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 1
Key Points Fracking is a process used to recover natural gas from deep shale formations. It
involves creating fissures or fractures in rocks to allow the gas to flow. The fractures
are created by injecting a hydraulic fracturing fluid, usually consisting of water, sand
and chemicals, down the well and into the shale gas formation. The sand keeps the
fractures open and allows the gas to flow via the well to the surface where it is
collected. Fracking is used in combination with a drilling process and therefore is not
itself a drilling process.
Fracking is common in the USA with at least 19 states involved in shale gas
development; it now accounts for 22% of US gas production and 32% of total
remaining recoverable gas resources in the US.
A number of companies have bought up exploratory concessions within Europe,
including in Germany and Poland. Companies, including Shell, Chevron and
Cuadrilla are active in Sweden, Ukraine, Denmark and France. Exploration is taking
place in the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and the UK.
In Ireland the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources has
issued onshore petroleum licences for exploration in the Clare Basin and the Lough
Allen Basin.
On the 29 June 2010 the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI)
placed a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union announcing the
availability of all of onshore Northern Ireland. The second round of applications is
still ongoing.
Criteria for judgement include the financial viability of the applicant and its financial
capability to carry out the proposed activities, the technical capability of the
applicant, the proposed work programme of the applicant and where the applicant
holds, or has held, a licence under the Petroleum (Production) Act (Northern Ireland)
1964, any lack of efficiency and responsibility displayed by the applicant in
operations under that licence.
Four licences have been granted to:
• Infrastrata plc and eCORP Oil & Gas UK Ltd – Lough Neagh Basin (Central
Lane) – Licence number PL1/10;
• Tamboran Resources Pty Limited – Lough Allen Basin (North) – Licence number
PL2/10;
• Rathlin Energy Limited – Rathlin Basin – Licence number PL3/10; and
• P.R. Singleton Ltd. – Rathlin Island – Licence number PL4/10
Among the potential environmental dangers of fracking are noise pollution, air
pollution, landscape impacts, traffic and road damage, water contamination and
increased seismic activity.
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 2
The European Parliament has published a report entitled ‘Impacts of shale gas and
shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ which outlines some
of these concerns.
Bans or moratoriums have been placed on the practice in several places including
Pennsylvania, New York State, New Jersey and France.
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 3
Executive Summary
The exploitation of shale gas through the joint processes of drilling and hydraulic
fracturing (fracking) is common around the world. In the United States, for instance,
shale gas development now accounts for 22% of gas production and 32% of total
remaining recoverable gas resources. At least 19 states are involved in the practice.
The process has recently become more financially viable due to advances made in
horizontal drilling, advances in fracking techniques and rapid increases in natural gas
prices as a result of significant supply and demand pressures.
Europe, increasingly, is showing interest in exploiting these natural reserves. A number
of companies have bought up exploratory concessions. Exxon Mobil has bought up
concessions in Germany and Poland. Shell is active in Sweden and Ukraine. Chevron
is in Poland. Total is in Denmark and France, and Cuadrilla is exploring in the
Netherlands, the Czech Republic as well as the UK.
Ireland is also making moves towards the process. The Department of
Communications, Energy and Natural Resources has issued onshore petroleum
licences for exploration (drilling to 200m and assessing if the gas is commercially
viable) in the Clare Basin and the Lough Allen Basin. In relation to the Lough Allen
Basin these were issued to Tamboran Resources Ltd covering 986km2 over parts of
Cavan, Leitrim and Sligo and to the Lough Allen Natural Gas Company Limited
covering 467km2 over parts of Cavan, Leitrim, Roscommon and Sligo. If successful the
companies will have a first option on a more expensive exploration licence although
this is a process that is at least two and half years away.
The North of Ireland has also granted four permits allowing holders to ‘search and bore
and get petroleum.’ The sites licensed are Lough Neagh Basin, Lough Allen Basin,
Rathlin Island and Rathlin Basin. DETI grants these permits and the application period
is ongoing. Permits are granted on the basis of fulfilling various criteria including the
financial and technical capability of the applicant to carry out the proposed work.
Cuadrilla Resources has been exploring in Lancashire since March 2011. According to
the BBC, as of September 2011:
“It said it had found 200 trillion cubic feet of gas under the ground, which if
recovered could provide 5,600 jobs in the UK, 1,700 of those in
Lancashire.”
However this work was halted in spring of 2011 following two small earthquakes which
Cuadrilla recently acknowledged where highly probably caused by drilling activity in the
area. However the Cuadrilla report went on to say that the quakes were due to an
"unusual combination of geology at the well site" and that conditions which caused the
minor earthquakes were "unlikely to occur again."
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 4
Other than increased seismic activity other issues highlighted around the subject of
fracking include noise pollution, air pollution, landscape impacts, traffic and road
damage and water contamination. Despite these frequently raised concerns, the
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research states there is very little information and
data on which to base a quantified assessment of environmental and human health
risk. The EU has recently published an article which highlights some of the key
criticisms of fracking, including potential water contamination and human health risks.
This research is drawn largely from the North American experience of fracking and the
report states that the risks have not been sufficiently covered. It should be noted that
many cases of water contamination are linked to poor practice by the companies
involved, poor regulation and in some cases poor well construction.
The cleanliness of shale gas as a fuel is estimated at various values by different
reports. According to researchers at Cornell University, compared to coal, the footprint
of shale gas is at least 20% greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-
year horizon, and is comparable over 100 years. The lead author claims that shale gas
may indeed be quite damaging to global warming, quite likely as bad or worse than
coal. However, an International Energy Agency (IEA) report stated that:
“Based on available data, we estimate that shale gas produced to proper
standards of environmental has slightly higher ‘well-to-burner’ emissions
than conventional gas, with combustion of gas being the dominant source
of emissions. Best practice in production, effectively monitored and
regulated, can mitigate other potential environmental risks such as
excessive water use, contamination and disposal.”
Fracking has been banned or had moratoriums placed on it in several places including
Pennsylvania, New York State, New Jersey and France. The reason given in most
cases is that more information is needed regarding the environmental impact of the
process.
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 5
Contents
Key Points .............................................................................................................................. 1
Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 3
Contents 5
1 What is fracking? .................................................................................................... 7
2 Fracking across the globe....................................................................................... 8
2.1 USA ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.2 Europe.................................................................................................................... 8
2.3 Island of Ireland ...................................................................................................... 9
2.4 UK .......................................................................................................................... 9
3 Northern Ireland ................................................................................................... 10
4 The Environmental Impact of Fracking ................................................................. 12
4.1 Noise Pollution ..................................................................................................... 12
4.2 Air Pollution .......................................................................................................... 12
4.3 Landscape Impacts .............................................................................................. 12
4.4 Traffic and Road Damage..................................................................................... 12
4.5 Additional risks ..................................................................................................... 13
4.5.1 Water Use in hydraulic fracturing operations ........................................................ 13
Figure 4 Water Use in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations ........................................ 13
4.5.2 Increased Seismic Activity .................................................................................... 14
5 European Parliament report: Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the
environment and on human health’ ....................................................................... 15
5.1 Disposal of Frack Fluid ................................................................................................... 15
5.2 Effects of fracking on human health ...................................................................... 16
5.2.1 Experiences in North America .............................................................................. 16
6 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 17
6.1 Shale gas ............................................................................................................. 17
6.2 Fracking ............................................................................................................... 19
7 Identified Bans/Moratoriums ................................................................................. 22
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 6
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 7
1 What is fracking?
Fracking is the common term applied to the process of hydraulic fracturing used to
recover natural gas from deep shale formations. It is called ‘fracking’ because it
involves creating fissures or fractures in rocks to allow the gas to flow. The fractures
are created by injecting a hydraulic fracturing fluid, usually consisting of water, sand
and chemicals, down the well and into the shale gas formation. The sand keeps the
fractures open and allows the gas to flow via the well to the surface where it is
collected.
Fracking is invariably used in combination with horizontal drilling to access shale gas
reserves. Fracking is therefore not a drilling process. It is applied after the drill hole
has been completed. Figure 1 provides an illustration of how fracking works in practice.
Figure 1: Shale gas extraction – hydraulic fracture 1
Source BBC
As with conventional drilling there are a number of issues relating to the preparation of
a site for production of shale gas:
Roads may need to be constructed to allow access to the site.
Well pads are constructed to locate the drilling rig and associated equipment during
the drilling process. Six to eight horizontal wells are drilled from a single well pad.
Each pad requires an area to store fluid and equipment necessary for high volume
fracturing operations as well as equipment associated with horizontal drilling. An
average size multi-well pad is likely to be 1.5-2ha in size during the drilling and
fracturing phase.
1 Ibid
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 8
Excavation of pits: for example large volumes of water are required in the drilling
and fracturing processes and this may require excavation of land to produce pits to
store water. Alternatively it may be possible to extract water from lakes/rivers for this
process though this would require laying pipes. In addition pits are required to store
waste water used in these processes.
2 Fracking across the globe
2.1 USA
Fracking is common in the USA with at least 19 states involved in shale gas
development.2 The production of natural gas from shale deposits has become
economically viable for three reasons:
Advances in horizontal drilling;
Advances in hydraulic fracturing techniques; and, perhaps more importantly,
Rapid increases in natural gas prices as a result of significant supply and
demand pressures.3
The only significant production of shale gas has also occurred in the USA where during
the last decade shale gas production has increased fourteen-fold; it now accounts for
22% of US gas production and 32% of total remaining recoverable gas resources in the
US.4
2.2 Europe
A number of companies have bought up exploratory concessions within Europe.
Exxon Mobil has bought up concessions in Germany and Poland. Shell is active in
Sweden and Ukraine. Chevron is in Poland. Total is in Denmark and France, and
Cuadrilla is exploring in the Netherlands, the Czech Republic as well as the UK.5 The
estimated shale gas resources in Europe are presented in Figure 2.6
2 http://fracfocus.org/sites/default/files/publications/shale_gas_primer_2009.pdf
3 Taken from Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer, p.9
4 http://www.state.gov/s/ciea/gsgi/index.htm
5 http://e360.yale.edu/feature/fracking_comes_to_europe_sparking_rising_controversy/2374/
6 European and Global Resources and the Potential of Unconventional Gas, pp.32, in Unconventional Gas – a Chance for
Poland and Europe? Analysis and Recommendations
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 9
Figure 2 Recoverable shale gas formations in Europe in billions of cubic metres
(bcm)
2.3 Ireland
The Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources has issued
onshore petroleum licences for exploration in the Clare Basin and the Lough Allen
Basin. In relation to the Lough Allen Basin these were issued to Tamboran Resources
Ltd covering 986km2 over parts of Cavan, Leitrim and Sligo and to the Lough Allen
Natural Gas Company Limited covering 467km2 over parts of Cavan, Leitrim,
Roscommon and Sligo.7
These licences are solely for initial exploration allowing the companies to drill to a
depth of 200m (650ft) and carry out technical studies to indicate whether the gas is
commercially viable. If successful the companies will have a first option on a more
expensive exploration licence although this is a process that is at least two and a half
years away.8
2.4 UK
Cuadrilla Resources has been exploring in Lancashire since March 2011. According to
the BBC, as of September 2011:
It said it had found 200 trillion cubic feet of gas under the ground, which if
recovered could provide 5,600 jobs in the UK, 1,700 of those in
Lancashire.9
7 http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2011/04/12/00021.asp
8 http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0221/1224290427180.html
9 BBC Shale gas firm finds 'vast' gas resources in Lancashire (Sept 2011) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-
14990573
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 10
Dart Energy Limited has applied to use hydraulic fracturing in an exploratory well at
Airth near Falkirk in Scotland before the end of the year.10
3 Northern Ireland
On the 29 June 2010 the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI)
placed a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union announcing the availability
of all of onshore Northern Ireland.11 The notice was in response to Directive 94/22/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using
authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons.
The directive was designed with ‘a view to reinforcing the integration of the internal
supply market, encouraging greater competition within it and improving the security of
supply’ and required Member States to establish common rules which ‘establish non-
discriminatory access to the activities of prospection, exploration and production of
hydrocarbons’.12
DETI carried out a consultation on the implementation of the directive between August
and September 2009 (the consultation closed 30 September 2009).13
The notice placed in June 2010 introduced two separate windows for applications. The
first placed a limit on applications of the 27 August 2010, any applications received in
this initial period were considered together. The second window began on the 30
August 2010 and is on-going. All applications received from this point are to be
considered in the order they are received.
A number of key criteria were included in the original notice; these formed the basis on
which applications would be judged. These are outlined below in their original wording:
The financial viability of the applicant and its financial capability to carry out the
activities that would be permitted under the licence during the initial term including
the work programme submitted for evaluating the full potential of the area applied
for;
The technical capability of the applicant to carry out activities that would be
permitted under the licence during the initial term including the identification of
hydrocarbon prospects within the area applied for;
10
Natural Gas Europe Shale Stirs Debate in Scotland (May 2011) http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/shale-stirs-debate-scotland 11
Official Journal of the European Union United Kingdom Government notice concerning implementation in Northern Ireland of
Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations
for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Notice of competent authority and arrangements for
authorisations in Northern Ireland (June 2010) http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:169:0003:0003:EN:PDF 12
Europa, Summaries of European Legislation – Prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/energy/internal_energy_market/l27007_en.htm 13
DETI Implementation of The Hydrocarbons Licensing Directive in Northern Ireland (August 2009)
http://www.detini.gov.uk/implementation_of_the_hydrocarbons_licensing_directive_in_northern_ireland.pdf
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 11
The way in which the applicant proposes to carry out the activities that would be
permitted by the licence including the quality of the work programme submitted for
evaluating the full potential of the area applied for. The work programme is to be
structured with the aim of drilling of one well in the area before the expiry of the
initial licence term which is a period of five years;
Where the applicant holds, or has held, a licence under the Petroleum (Production)
Act (Northern Ireland) 1964, any lack of efficiency and responsibility displayed by
the applicant in operations under that licence.14
As a result of this process, there were four licences granted:
Infrastrata plc and eCORP Oil & Gas UK Ltd – Lough Neagh Basin (Central Lane) –
Licence number PL1/10;
Tamboran Resources Pty Limited – Lough Allen Basin (North) – Licence number
PL2/10;
Rathlin Energy Limited – Rathlin Basin – Licence number PL3/10; and
P.R. Singleton Ltd. – Rathlin Island – Licence number PL4/10
Figure 3 shows the geographical spread of these sites. All four licences grant the
licence holder with permission to ‘search and bore and get petroleum’.15
Figure 3 : Petroleum Licences in Northern Ireland June 2011
14
Official Journal of the European Union United Kingdom Government notice concerning implementation in Northern Ireland of
Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations
for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Notice of competent authority and arrangements for
authorisations in Northern Ireland (June 2010) http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:169:0003:0003:EN:PDF 15
DETI Petroleum Licencing in Northern Ireland http://www.detini.gov.uk/deti-energy-index/minerals-and-
petroleum/petroleum_licensing_2.htm
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 12
4 The Environmental Impact of Fracking
According to the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research there is very little
information and data on which to base a quantified assessment of environmental and
human health risk.16 However, there are issues which are readily identifiable as
potential sources of pollution and associated with standard oil or gas exploration:
4.1 Noise Pollution
Individually and collectively the activities associated with well pads prior to production
will produce noise for between 500-1500 days as indicated although it would be
expected that continuous drilling of wells 24 hours per day for up to 18 months would
be significant for a single pad. If pads are allocated at 1.25-3.5pads/km2 then this will
obviously create greater noise pollution for a locality.17
4.2 Air Pollution
Air emissions occur during exploration and production activities including NOx, volatile
organic compounds, particulate matter, SO2 and methane.18 However, the
Environment Agency told the House of Commons Energy and Climate Change
Committee19 that it was
"not expecting big air quality implications […] the Government have oversight of the
implementation of the Air Quality Directive […] the Environment Agency has to have
regard to the National Air Quality strategy". The Environment Agency "would prefer that
if methane is being discharged that it was flared, because obviously that converts it to
carbon dioxide, which is a much less potent greenhouse gas […] but we would respect
the Health and Safety Executive's judgment about what is safe".
4.3 Landscape Impacts
Impact on the landscape is inevitable with any drilling operation. The mechanical
processes involved in a site prior to production and the associated requirements
include storage sites, chemical tanks, drilling equipment, trucks etc. The visual, and
associated, impacts will depend on the number of well pads located in an area i.e. it
may be difficult to take steps to alleviate the visual impact if there are multiple well
pads.
4.4 Traffic and Road Damage
16
Shale gas: a provisional assessment of climate change and environmental impact, pp. 15. Tyndall Centre for Climate
Change Research (January 2011) 17
Shale gas: a provisional assessment of climate change and environmental impact, pp. 70. Tyndall Centre for Climate
Change Research (January 2011) 18
Taken from Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer, Executive Summary, p.5 19
Energy and Climate Change Committee – fifth report, Shale Gas
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 13
Increased traffic, particularly truck visits to and from the site, could be significant and
will depend on the number of well pads. Coupled with this increase in heavy traffic is
the potential for road damage.
4.5 Additional risks
4.5.1 Water Use in hydraulic fracturing operations
There are a number of associated risks from the use of water in the hydraulic fracturing
process. The US Environmental Protection Agency identified the risks which are
presented in a flowchart figure 4.
Figure 4 Water Use in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations
Source: US EPA, Draft to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water, February
2011, p 14
Perhaps of particular concern in relation to water is the potential for pollution of
groundwater aquifers. The fracking process consumes huge amounts of water,
between 2 and 4 million gallons, depending on the nature of the extraction site.20 As
20
Taken from Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer, Executive Summary p.4
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 14
noted above this water comprises the large part of the fracturing fluid which also
includes sand and other chemical additives. As many shale deposits are found under
aquifers the process of drilling can potentially release this mixture of water and
chemicals into the aquifer.
There has been concern in the USA that fracking has, in some cases, resulted in
contamination of drinking water with chemicals and/or methane. A study21 by Duke
University in the USA outlines the concerns:
Concerns for impacts to groundwater resources are based on (i) fluid (water and gas)
flow and discharge to shallow aquifers due to the high pressure of the injected
fracturing fluids in the gas wells); (ii) the toxicity and radioactivity of produced water
from a mixture of fracturing fluids and deep saline formation waters that may
discharge to the environment; (iii) the potential explosion and asphyxiation hazard of
natural gas; and (iv) the large number of private wells in rural areas that rely on shallow
groundwater for household and agricultural use
This is an important issue in the USA where nearly half the population relies on
groundwater aquifers as their primary source of drinking water; rising in rural areas to
around 95%.22 Groundwater aquifers may also discharge water into rivers, lakes and
wetlands and therefore if the groundwater is contaminated surface waters may also be
contaminated by these discharges.
However, while the study did indicate that there was evidence for methane
contamination of some shallow drinking-water systems due to poor well construction
there was no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline
brines or fracturing fluid.
The recent report by a House of Commons Select Committee, referred to above,
concluded that:
“hydraulic fracturing itself does not pose a direct risk to water aquifers, provided that
the well-casing is intact before this commences. Rather, any risks that do arise are
related to the integrity of the well, and are no different to issues encountered when
exploring for hydrocarbons in conventional geological formations. We recommend that
the Health and Safety Executive test the integrity of wells before allowing the licensing
of drilling activity”.23
4.5.2 Increased Seismic Activity
21
Osborn, S.G.,Vengosh,A., Warner, N.R., and R.B. Jackson (2011) Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying
gas well drilling and hydraulic fracturing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 22
http://fracfocus.org/water-protection/groundwater-aquifers 23
Energy and Climate Change Committee – fifth report, Shale Gas
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 15
There have been a number of reports in the media relating increased seismic activity
with fracking. In the UK, for example, the energy company Cuadrilla Resources
suspended its prospecting near Blackpool, Lancashire after concerns that the process
had initiated two small earthquakes. 24 One tremor of magnitude 2.3 hit the Fylde coast
on 1 April, followed by a second of magnitude 1.4 on 27 May. On 2 November 2011
Cuadrilla released a report which states that it is ‘highly probable’ that the seismic
activity was caused by the drilling taking place in the vicinity. However it also contends
that the quakes were due to an "unusual combination of geology at the well site". 25 It
also said conditions which caused the minor earthquakes were "unlikely to occur
again". Other news reports in the USA suggest a correlation between fracking and
increased seismic activity.26 Following a phone call from a concerned resident the
Oklahoma Geological Survey carried out research on a possible link between fracking
and nearby earthquakes. Their analysis showed that shortly after hydraulic fracturing
began small earthquakes started occurring, and more than 50 were identified, of which
43 were large enough to be located. Most of these earthquakes occurred within a 24
hour period after hydraulic fracturing operations had ceased. The strong correlation in
time and space as well as a reasonable fit to a physical model suggest that there is a
possibility these earthquakes were induced by hydraulic-fracturing. However, the
uncertainties in the data make it impossible to say with a high degree of certainty
whether or not these earthquakes were triggered by natural means or by the nearby
hydraulic-fracturing operation.27
5 European Parliament report: Impacts of shale gas and shale
oil extraction on the environment and on human health
The EU has recently published a piece of research on the practice of fracking. This
report focuses particularly on the disposal of frack fluid and the potential impact on
human health. The evidence is drawn largely from the North American experience of
fracking as European fracking is very much in its infancy.28 According to the report the
specific risks of hydraulic fracturing are not sufficiently covered.29
5.1 Disposal of Frack Fluid
Fracturing fluids are injected into geological formations at high pressure. Once the
pressure is released, a mixture of fracturing fluid, methane, compounds and additional
water from the deposit flow back to the surface. This water must be collected and
properly disposed of. According to industry sources, between 20% and 50% of the
24
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/mps-call-for-inquiry-into-shale-gas-drilling-after-earthquakes-2294389.html 25
BBC, Fracking tests near Blackpool 'likely cause' of tremors : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-15550458 26
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/01/fracking-earthquakes-arkansas-man-experts-warn/ 27
Oklahoma Geological Survey, http://www.ogs.ou.edu/pubsscanned/openfile/OF1_2011.pdf p.1 28
European Parliament, ‘Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201107/20110715ATT24183/20110715ATT24183EN.pdf p.3 29
European Parliament, ‘Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201107/20110715ATT24183/20110715ATT24183EN.pdf p.10
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 16
water used for hydro-fracking gas wells returns to the surface as flowback. Part of this
water will be recycled to fracture future wells. According to other sources, between 9%
and 35% recover to the surface.30 The proper disposal of waste water has been raised
as a major issue in North America, particularly regarding the huge quantity of waste
water and the improper configuration of sewage plants. Although recycling would
appear to be possible in some cases, project costs may increase as a result of the
recycling process.
Some problems associated with the improper disposal of water have been reported.
Most of these water contaminations are due to improper practices. It has been
concluded therefore that very strict handling of these issues is mandatory. In Europe,
for example in Germany, reportedly accidents have occurred in hydraulic fracturing
operations. For instance, waste water pipes from the tight gas field Söhlingen are
reported to have leaked in 2007, causing groundwater contamination with benzene and
mercury. Though the corresponding Mining Agency of Lower Saxony
(Landesbergbehörde) was correctly informed, reportedly the public noticed the accident
only in 2011 when the company started to replace the agricultural soil where the fluids
had leaked into the ground.31
5.2 Effects of fracking on human health
Possible health effects are mainly caused by the impacts of the relevant emissions into
air or water. These consist predominantly of headaches, and long-term effects from
volatile organic compounds. Groundwater contamination may be dangerous when
inhabitants come into contact with contaminated water. For instance, when small
children are frequently washed with contaminated water this may have an effect on
allergies and general health. Also, wastewater pits and blow-out fluids are a matter of
concern when the skin is exposed.
5.2.1 Experiences in North America
Beyond potential effects actual health effects and their direct link to hydraulic fracturing
activities are rarely documented. Usually, reports on headaches are prominent. The
death of young horses in Dish (Texas) has been linked by some to gas drilling there;
however, this relation cannot be proven. Other extreme, but well-documented,
examples of the health repercussions of drilling exist, although their relation to gas
drilling cannot be proven. The case of Laura Amos is stated in a written testimony to
the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, USA:
A woman [Laura Amos] from Silt, Garfield County, Colorado called to tell
me that she had developed a very rare adrenal tumor and had to have the
30 European Parliament, ‘Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201107/20110715ATT24183/20110715ATT24183EN.pdf
31 European Parliament, ‘Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201107/20110715ATT24183/20110715ATT24183EN.pdf
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 17
tumor and her adrenal gland removed. One of the effects of 2-BE [2-butoxy
ethanol] was adrenal tumors. She told me that she lived within 900 feet of a
busy gas well pad where frac’ing took place frequently. During one frac’ing
episode her domestic water well erupted. She also began describing the
health problems of others who lived near her.]
Another well-known case is that of a nurse, Cathy Behr:
In mid–August [2008] the Colorado debate intensified when news broke
that Cathy Behr, an emergency room nurse in Durango, Colorado, had
almost died after treating a wildcatter who had been splashed in a fracking
fluid spill at a BP natural gas rig. Behr stripped the man and stuffed his
clothes into plastic bags…. A few days later Behr lay in critical condition
facing multiple organ failure.” [Lustgarten 2008]32
The Environmental Protection Agency in the US has been forced by the
volume of reports of negative environmental and health impacts to conduct
an investigation of its effects. Their report will not appear until the end of
2014.33
6 Discussion
6.1 Shale gas
Shale gas has already had significant impact on the gas industry in the USA. In a 2009
report, Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer, prepared for
the US Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology
Laboratory by the Groundwater Protection and ALL Consulting, noted that:
At the U.S. production rates for 2007, about 19.3 tcf (trillion cubic feet34),
the current recoverable resource estimate provides enough natural gas to
supply the U.S. for the next 90 years. Separate estimates of the shale gas
resource extend this supply to 116 years.35
The report adds:
Shale gas resource estimates are likely to change as new information,
additional experience, and advances in technology become available.36
32
European Parliament, ‘Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health’ :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201107/20110715ATT24183/20110715ATT24183EN.pdf p.35 33
Irish Times, Legislators must deal with dangers of 'fracking':
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2011/1003/1224305143508.html, (accessed 24/10/2011) 34
A trillion cubic feet is estimated by the US Department of Energy to be the equivalent of heating 15m homes for one year 35
US Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory Modern Shale Gas
Development in the United States: A Primer (April 2009) http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-
gas/publications/epreports/shale_gas_primer_2009.pdf (accessed 29/06/11) 36
Ibid
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 18
Concluding:
Considering natural gas’s clean-burning nature, the nation’s domestic
natural gas resources, and the presence of supporting infrastructure, the
development of domestic shale gas reserves will be an important
component of the U.S.’s energy portfolio for many years. Recent
successes in a variety of geologic basins have created the opportunity for
shale gas to be a strategic part of the nation’s energy and economic
growth.37
The economic impact of increased shale gas exploration and production was illustrated
in a recent Bloomberg article:
The shale gas rush is creating thousands of jobs and reviving the economy
in states such as Wyoming, Texas, and Louisiana. In Pennsylvania, where
2,516 wells have been drilled in the last three years, $389 million in tax
revenue and 44,000 jobs came from gas drilling in 2009, according to a
Penn State report.38
The same article goes on to state ‘best of all, natural gas emits half the carbon
emissions of oil’. While it is true that natural gas is considerably ‘cleaner’ than oil –
Department of Energy and Climate Change data estimates that in 2008 gas CO2
emissions in the UK were approximately 0.19 kilograms of CO2 per kilowatt hour of
energy used (CO2/kWh), compared to 0.25CO2/kWh from oil, 0.34CO2/kWh from solid
fuel and 0.54CO2/kWh from electricity – shale gas’ emissions impact appears less
favourable.
Commenting on shale gas in its report Are we entering a golden age of gas?39 (June
2011), the International Energy Agency (IEA) state:
Based on available data, we estimate that shale gas produced to proper
standards of environmental has slightly higher ‘well-to-burner’ emissions
than conventional gas, with combustion of gas being the dominant source
of emissions. Best practice in production, effectively monitored and
regulated, can mitigate other potential environmental risks such as
excessive water use, contamination and disposal.40
Speaking at the launch of the report, IEA executive director, Nobuo Tanaka stated:
While natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel, it is still a fossil fuel. Its
increased use could muscle out low-carbon fuels such as renewables and
37
Ibid 38
Bloomberg Businessweek Fracking: The Great Shale Gas Rush (3 March 2011)
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_11/b4219025777026.htm (accessed 29/06/11) 39
International Energy Agency Are we entering a golden age of gas? (June 2011)
http://www.iea.org/weo/docs/weo2011/WEO2011_GoldenAgeofGasReport.pdf (accessed 29/06/11) 40
Ibid
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 19
nuclear, particularly in the wake of Fukushima. An expansion of gas use
alone is no panacea for climate change.41
A less optimistic conclusion was reached by researchers at Cornell, in a report
published in the journal Climate Change42:
Compared to coal, the footprint of shale gas is at least 20% greater and
perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon, and is
comparable over 100 years.43
Speaking to the BBC the lead author commented:
We have produced the first comprehensive analysis of the greenhouse gas
footprint of shale gas… We have used the best available data [and] the
conclusion is that shale gas may indeed be quite damaging to global
warming, quite likely as bad or worse than coal.44
6.2 Fracking
The practice of Fracking has given rise to some controversy, recognised by the House
of Commons Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change’s 2011 report into
shale gas:
The concern about the impact of more widespread use of hydraulic
fracturing has produced political reactions.45
The key environmental risk identified by the Committee was the possibility of
contaminating drinking water. Quoting evidence gathered from the US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the Committee stated:
We heard during our visit to the US, that the US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) believed that—from evidence it had gathered so far—that "if
hydraulic fractures combine with pre-existing faults of fractures that lead to
[drinking water] aquifers or directly extend into aquifers, injection could lead
to the contamination of drinking water supplies by fracturing fluid, natural
gas, and/or natural occurring substances".
During the fracturing process, some of the hydraulic fracturing fluid may
flow through the artificially created fractures to other areas within the shale
gas formation, in a phenomenon known as "fluid leakoff". Fluid leakoff
41
The Guardian Natural gas is no climate change 'panacea', warns IEA (6 June 2011)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/06/natural-gas-climate-change-no-panacea (accessed 29/06/11) 42
Howarth, Robert W, et al Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations (April 2011) Climate
Change (2011) 106:679–690 http://www.springerlink.com/content/e384226wr4160653/fulltext.pdf (accessed 29/06/11) 43
BBC News Shale gas 'worse than coal' for climate (12 April 2011) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13053040
(accessed (29/06/11) 44
Ibid 45
www.parliament.co.uk Energy and Climate Change Committee - Fifth Report Shale Gas (May 2011)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm (accessed 29/06/2011)
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 20
during hydraulic fracturing "can exceed 70 percent of the injected volume if
not controlled properly", which could result in fluid migrating into drinking
water aquifers. In comparison, coal-bed methane formations are mostly
shallow, so where hydraulic fracturing is used there is a risk that it could be
happening in—or very near to—shallow drinking water supplies46
The report continues:
During our visit to the US, we heard little concern from environmental
groups, state or federal regulators, or academics on the environmental
impacts of the hydraulic fracturing process itself. Any instances of methane
contamination of groundwater were either blamed on poor well construction
(an issue that applies to conventional as well as unconventional
hydrocarbons) or were thought to pre-date any hydrofracing activity.47
In other sections of the report, the Committee draw attention to the evidence presented
by the World Wildlife Federation on which the report states:
…that it did not believe that shale gas production should be allowed to take
place in the UK. At the very least it considered that "no permits should be
granted for shale gas activity [...] until there is a robust scientific consensus
demonstrating exactly what the risks are.48
Similarly, the Tyndall Centre’s evidence to the Committee concluded that the risk of
local pollution:
… leaves little doubt that in the absence of a much improved understanding
of the extraction process shale gas should not be exploited within the UK.49
The report also makes clear that some regions had either placed a moratorium on
fracking activity or were leaning towards doing so. New York State placed a temporary
halt on the issuing of permits for hydraulic fracturing in August 2010, while the EPA
carried out further research into the process (due 2012).50 The New York ban was to be
lifted in May 201151, but has been extended until June 201252. (Note the section that
follows contains a summary list of fracking moratoriums)
Three permits have been granted in France to date. However, in February 2011, the
French Minister of the Environment stated that ‘in light of the techniques that are used
46
Ibid 47
Ibid 48
Ibid 49
Ibid 50
Ibid 51
CNN New York could be first state to ban controversial drilling practice (December 2010)
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/12/02/new.york.fracking.moratorium/index.html (accessed 29/06/11) 52
Fox News State Assembly Passes Moratorium on Hydrofracking (June 2011)
http://www.wicz.com/news2005/viewarticle.asp?a=18943
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 21
in North America, which are understandably criticised, we will heighten our vigilance’.53
A law bringing in an outright ban on fracking in the country passed the lower house of
parliament on its first reading, in May 2011. The law must also pass the Senate for
approval.54
The Commons Select Committee report concluded however, that a moratorium was
unwarranted:
Mitigation of the risk to water aquifers from hydraulic fracturing relies on
companies undertaking the proper measures to protect the environment
from pollution. However, there is no evidence that the hydraulic fracturing
process itself poses a direct risk to underground water aquifers. That
hypothetical and unproven risk must be balanced against the energy
security benefits that shale gas could provide to the UK. We conclude that,
on balance, a moratorium in the UK is not justified or necessary at
present.55
Adding:
We conclude that hydraulic fracturing itself does not pose a direct risk to
water aquifers, provided that the well-casing is intact before this
commences. Rather, any risks that do arise are related to the integrity of
the well, and are no different to issues encountered when exploring for
hydrocarbons in conventional geological formations. We recommend that
the Health and Safety Executive test the integrity of wells before allowing
the licensing of drilling activity.
We recommend that the Environment Agency should insist that all
companies involved in hydraulic fracturing should declare the type,
concentration and volume of all chemicals they are using.
We recommend that before the Environment Agency permits any chemicals
to be used in hydraulic fracturing fluid, they must ensure that they have the
capabilities to monitor for, and potentially detect, these chemicals in local
water supplies.56
A further environmental issue was highlighted by recent events in Blackpool, when the
exploration of shale resulted in a 1.5 magnitude tremor. The test drilling in Blackpool
was being carried out by Cuadrilla Resources, who have stated:
53
Bloomberg French Minister Warns Shale Oil Explorers on Environment (2 February 2011)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-02/french-minister-warns-shale-oil-explorers-on-environment.html (accessed
29/06/11) 54
France 24 French lawmakers back ban on shale gas tapping (11 May 2011) http://www.france24.com/en/20110511-french-
lawmakers-back-ban-shale-gas-tapping# (accessed 29/06/11) 55
www.parliament.co.uk Energy and Climate Change Committee - Fifth Report Shale Gas (May 2011)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm (accessed 29/06/2011) 56
Ibid
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 22
We take our responsibilities very seriously and that is why we have stopped
fracking operations to share information and consult with the relevant
authorities and other experts.
We expect that this analysis and subsequent consultation will take a
number of weeks to conclude and we will decide on appropriate actions
after that.57
As a result of the events in Blackpool, MPs for the area have called for a safety inquiry
into shale gas extraction.58
In the Republic of Ireland, where Tamboran have also licensing option, the Department
of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources have stated that fracking would not
go ahead in the Lough Allen basin without a public consultation and environmental
impact assessment.59
In the Irish Times interview, referred to above, Tamboran did not rule out the use of
fracking in stating it would be ‘impractical’ to do so. On the issue of water
contamination the Chief Executive Stated:
We use some chemicals. The bottom line some of the additives we use, we
use a light detergent. It softens the water if you are going to 0.1 per cent by
volume of a light deter much like you would use in a washing machine. We
also use an additive that basically starves the bacteria. There is some really
neat chemistry work that companies are using to try and find a greener
process. There is a company in Alberta called Multichem which is doing a
lot of work for the industry. In the very beginning a test would have very
minor fractures. We need to determine if the rock will crack. A full size frack
is years away because it takes time to understand what the rock will do. It
is not a safety issue. We are just trying to get the best job. Most jobs are
very expensive so we just don’t want to go on a wing and a note.60
7 Identified Bans/Moratoriums
Pennsylvania – The state legislature passed the Marcellus Shale Bill in May 2010 that
enforced a three-year moratorium on further leasing of exploration acreage until a
comprehensive environmental impact assessment has been carried out.61
57
BBC News Blackpool Shale Gas drilling suspended after quake (31 May 2011) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-
lancashire-13599161 (accessed 29/06/11) 58
BBC News Shale gas fracking: MPs call for safety inquiry after tremors (8 June 2011) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-
lancashire-13700575 (accessed 29/06/11) 59
The Irish Times Contentious method key to northwest gas, says company chief (11 June 2011)
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0611/1224298736261.html (accessed 29/06/2011) 60
Irish Times Interview with Tamboran chief executive Richard Moorman about the prospects for drilling for natural gas in Lough
Allen (11 June 2011) http://www.irishtimes.com/focus/2011/allen/index.pdf (accessed 29/06/11) 61
NJ Spotlight Lawmakers Declare New Jersey a No-Fracking Zone (March 11)
:http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/11/0310/2151/
NIAR 774-2011 Research Paper
Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service 23
New York State – On August 2010 a temporary moratorium on new shale gas activity
until the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported on its study of shale
gas.62
New Jersey – A one year moratorium has been in place from 25th August 2011.63
France – France is the first nation to ban hydraulic fracturing.64 The government came
under heavy pressure from concerned citizens; a law was passed, by vote of 176 to
151, on Thursday 30 June 2011.65 As well as the environmental concerns involved;
there was also controversy surrounding the granting of certain exploration permits,
particularly in relation to exploration in the south of the country and in the Paris basin.
Concerns exist within the liberal wing of French parliament that this ‘ban’ contains
certain loopholes which may allow other forms of shale extraction to continue. The new
law provides a two month notification period in which companies with current oil shale
drilling permits must notify the state as to which extraction technique they are using; if
fracking is declared, or if the company fails to respond within that time period, the
permits will be revoked.66
62
Fox News State Assembly Passes Moratorium on Hydrofracking (June 2011) :
http://www.wicz.com/news2005/viewarticle.asp?a=18943 63
Reuters New Jersey issues one-year moratorium on fracking ; http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/us-shale-newjersey-
idUSTRE77O6VN20110825 64
Planet Save, ‘France is Now First Nation to Ban ‘Fracking’ : http://planetsave.com/2011/07/10/france-is-now-first-nation-
to-ban-fracking/, (accessed 24/10/2011) 65
Le Point, ‘Gaz de schiste : Paris interdit la fracturation hydraulique : http://www.lepoint.fr/economie/gaz-de-schiste-paris-
interdit-la-fracturation-hydraulique-01-07-2011-1348093_28.php (accessed 24/10/2011) 66
Planet Save, ‘France is Now First Nation to Ban ‘Fracking’ : http://planetsave.com/2011/07/10/france-is-now-first-nation-
to-ban-fracking/,(accessed 24/10/2011)
Niar 774-11 Annexe 1
Details of companies which have applied for a fracking licence in Northern Ireland
Company name Registered Office Subsidiary Companies Annual Turnover 2010
Providence Resources Public Limited Company
Airfield House, Airfield Park, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, Co. Dublin
Eirgas Limited, PR Oil and Gas Indonesia Limited, PR Oil and Gas Nigeria Limited, Providence Resources (GOM No 2) LLC, Providence Resources (GOM) LLC, Providence Resources (Gulf) Limited, Providence Resources (Holding USA) LLC, Providence Resources (International) Limited, Providence Resources (Nigeria Holdings) Limited, Providence Resources (Trading) Limited, Providence Resources (US Holdings) Limited, P.R. Singleton Limited, P.R. UK Holdings Limited, Providence Resources (N.I.) Limited, Providence Resources UK Limited
£9,457,000
Rathlin Energy Limited
50 Bedford Street, Belfast, BT2 7FW
Information not available
Unknown
Rathlin Energy (Uk) Limited
20-22 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4JS, England
Information not available
Unknown