-Ai84 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JUSTIFICATION OF … · iui: department of the army justification of...

-Ai84 289 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR 112FISCAL YEARS 19088/1 (U) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF FORRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITIO JAN 87

UNCLASSIFIED F/G 15/5 NL

-.1 11111112.

- .6

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS I963-A

a' -N i- P -1 . .• 0•

-q 1 " q" .l 'p • . -1 .

UJICiLE. IuI:

DEPARTMENT OF THEARMY

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTMATES FOR FISCAL YEARS 1988/1989

oPROCUREMENT APPROPRIATIONS-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMNSUBMITTED TO CONGRESS

Tt JANUARY 198700

00 FORMS 1391

DTICFAMELECTE~iSEP 1 6 1987

87 -9 1

A, 2c - li. . _,

Reproduction of this document inwhole or in part is prohibitedexcept with permission of the

issuing office.

kJ.,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYOffice of the Deputy Chief of Staff

forResearch, Development and Acquisition

.i

'4 ' , *. • ., - . . . ...... " ." " " "J . '..°* * *--"°

,**,- * " " **' ,.. ", " . .. . . . :.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYJUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/1989

FY 1988 - PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT

P-i Line No: 32

*. APPROPRIATION: Procurement of Missile6, ArmyCost Estimate Page

Installation Project No. Project Title ($000) No.

Redstone Arsenal, 8822290-1 Modernization, 1.250 2Alabama Propellant

Deaeration

Redstone Arsenal, 8822290-2 Modernization, 1.850Alabama Small Motor

Finishing

iCe Icn ?or

N ~jT:S TiP

I?;?;T-,____'____

I .

~ ~ *

|I. COMPONENT a OL ATSFY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY 1 1, 87

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEREDSTONE ARSENAL--MICOM Modernization

Alabama Propellant Deaeration (K)

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST (5000)TEMP

Production B 222 90 2209-1 1,250

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT 4aitCOST S000l

PRIMARY FACILITY 920Propellant Deaeration SF 3,150 292.00 920)

SUPPORT FACILITIES 147Electric Service LS .. .. 14)

Water, Sewer & Gas LS .. .. 16)

Steam, Chilled Water & Heat Dist LS .. .. 38)

Paving, Walks, Curbs &-Gutters LS .. .. 31)

Site Imp( 48)Demo( ) LS .. .. 48)

CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 107

TOTAL CONTRACT COST 1,174

SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD C5.60%) 66

TOTAL REQUEST 1,240

TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,250

INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Oinritiof of Propomd Co ,stnwion

This project provides a propellant deaeration building for efficient

production of solid rocket motors.It replaces facilities which were designed

in 1938-1942 for making artillery shells.

11. REQUIREMENT: 3,150 SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECTThis project is for the replacement of a building that provides the

mechanical air removal from propellant prior to its casting into rocket

motors. It also provides a support area for the clean up of equipment used

in the casting process. The building is designed for 1.1 hazard class

propellant and complies with intraline building spacing and revetment

protection safety requirements.

DD FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USEO INTERNALLY

.il

S.D ocL3U. U.

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

A FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA J AN 1987ARMY I

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONREDSTONE ARSENAL--MICOMAlabama

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

Modernization TEMP

Propellant Deaeration (K) 2209-1

REQUIREMENT

This facility is required in close proximity to the rocket motor casting

operation. It provides a preparation area for both propellant and equipmentto assure quality of the product, cleanliness of equipment and safety duringthe casting process. The current facility has deteriorated to a point whereit is no longer feasible to repair it to meet safety and efficiencystandards. The newer 1.1 hazard class propellants required for present andfuture tactical rocket motors demand higher safety standards and are notcompatible with current 1.3 hazard class propellants. Increased safetyrequirements for 1.1 class propellants specified in AMCR 385-100 will be metwith the new facility.

CURRENT SITUATION :Rocket motor manufacturing and loading is now being performed in buildingsdesigned for artillery shell loading in 1938-1942. Some additionalfacilities were provided in the late 1950's. They were designed for 1.3hazard type propellants. The new 1.1 hazard type propellant has moredemanding building safety requirements, greater spacing between buildings,and is not compatible with present 1.3 hazard type propellant. The presentbuilding has deteriorated to a point where it is no longer economicallyfeasible to maintain it to sustain a safe production capability for smallrocket motors.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDIf not provided the current facility will require extensive above normalaintenance and will require evaluation for safety waivers to remain a

useful production facility. Production efficiencies resulting from balancedproduction line capacity will not be realized. Ultimately the currentfacility will not be able to provide the temperature and atmosphericontrols necessary to produce 1.1 class propellant.

ADDITIONALThis project is part of a modernization program begun in 1985 to provide

upgrade the government owned capability to produce small rocket motors. New

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE No. 3

1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

Ir


ARMY FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ., 197



Modernization TEMPPropellant Deaeration (K) 99nQ-I

rocket systems require that 1.3 class facilities be replaced by facilities

capable of housing 1.1 class operations.

THOMAS D. REESEMajor General, USACommand ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: OCTOBER 1987 INDEX: 1555

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JULY 1988 INDEX: 1590

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

DD IDC7 1391c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO- 4

% - o1c-A1.P .e4


ARMY I FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987


4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMPPropellant Deaeration WK 2209-1

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 35

($000)B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY

OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ......... 4(PEOPLE)

C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE DESIRED FACILITY ........................................... 1000($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)

E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE.)

1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... JUL 84

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED .................... DEC 86

2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES X NO

b. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............

b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) - (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........

d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. OCT 87

DO FORM 13 9 1c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 5

1. COMPONENT |. DATEARMY FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA D -2 19873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

REDSTONE ARSENAL ModernizationAlabama Small Motor Finishing (S)

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 0. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST (8000)TEMP

222 90 2209-2 1,8509. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY coT (C000

PRIMARY FACILITY 1,495Small Motor Finishing Building s 4,20C 355.9( 1,495)

SUPPORT FACILITIES 98Electric Service LE .... ( 29)Water, Sewer & Gas LE .. .. ( 18)Steam, Chilled Water & Heat Dist LE .. .. ( 12)Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS .. C 39)

.

SUBTOTAL 1,593CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 159TOTAL CONTRACT COST 1,752SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD ( 5.60%) 98TOTAL REQUEST 1,850TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,850INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Osription ol Propos.d Construction

This building provides small motor finishing operations for 1.1 and 1.3hazard classification solid rocket motors. Safety requirements in AMCR385-100 will be met.Building will be heated and air conditioned.

V.

'. 11. REQUIREMENT: 4,200 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT

This building is needed for finishing operations for 1.1 motors loaded,

cured, and assembled elsewhere in this line.I,

.1

FORM Pl49VIOUS EDITIONS MAY OE USED INTERNALLYDO iDEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. (3

J

FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. ATE

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

REDSTONE ARSENALAlabahm a

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernizat ion TEMPqmal I Maror Finishing (S) 2209-2

REQUIREMENT

This facility is the only means to support 1.1 low smoke/minimtm smokerocket motors in the north plant.

CURRENT SITUATION :

Solid rocket motors are being manufactured in modified buildings designedfor artillery shell loading during 1938 to 1942 (1.3 hazard classpropellants). 1.I propellants are more demanding in safety requirements andare not compatible with 1.3 propellants. Continued impacts of safetyconstraints have made work arounds for 1.1 propellants unfeasible.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED

Safety requirements cannot be met for small rocket motors.

THOMAS D. REESEMajor General,USACommand ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1988 INDEX: 1575ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: 1605ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623

FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 7c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 7


ARMY FY 19 8 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 19873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONREDSTONE ARSENAL

Al ab an a4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMPSmall Motor Finishing (S) 2209-2

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY .........(PEOPLE)


THE DESIRED FACILITY ........................................... 3750

($000)D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A

REPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)

E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... JUL 84

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... DEC 86

2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES NO Xb. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................

c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........


4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. APR 88

iJDD FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

1 DEC 7S UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 8

11



APPROPRIATION: Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army

Activity 1 - Tracked Combat Vehicles

Cost Estimate PageInstallation Project No. Project Title ($000) No.

Mainz 882006 Facilitization 1.050 10Germany at Main Army

Depot


Mainz 882006 Facilitization 5.300 13

Germany at Main ArmyDepot

- I

Lima Army PSER Constrcution 6.000 17Tank Plant

r0

1

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEAF~MY FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 187. ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION . PROJECT TITLEMAINZGermany Facilitization at Mainz Army Depot

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 0. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER &PROJECT COST ($=I

TEMP000 00 G882006 1 050

9. COST ESTIMATES _

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST (11000

PRIMARY FACILITY 944Main Steam & Condensate Lines (Gonsenheim) LF 2,080 453.85 944)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 944CONTINGENCY PERCENT (5.00%) 47TOTAL CONTRACT COST 991SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (6.50%) 64TOTAL REQUEST 1,055TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,050INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. De rption of Propond Construction

Installation of steam and condensate main lines to include excavation ofground, installation of the piping, and restoration of areas includingby-works.

11. REQUIREMENT: ADEQUATE: SUBSTD:PROJECTInstallation of new steam and condensate lines at the Gonsenheim facility.This project will preclude the need to purchase replacement small individualboilers for facilities not located near to existing steam lines.

REQUIREMENTBecause some facilities at the Gonsenheim site are not located next toexisting steam lines, they require small individual boilers for steamsupplies. The existing boiler plant has sufficient capacity to support thesefacilities but requires some new steam and condensate return lines.

DD FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD , DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 10

R S I


FY 1988_ MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,..ARMY I

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

MAINZGermanv

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMP

Facilitization at Mainz Army Depot G82006

CURRENT SITUATION

Facilities not located near to existing steam lines require individualboilers for steam supply. Connection to the existing central boiler is the

most economically favorable solution.


Failure to provide this project will require a larger life-cycle cost forproviding steam to facilities not located near to the existing steam

distribution system.

WILLIAM S. LITTLEFIELD

COL

Commander

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1988 INDEX: 1575

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: .1605


FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO -11DEC7

,S


FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMAINZGermany4. PROJECT TITLE . PROJECT NUMBER

TEMP


SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY($000)

B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRYOUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY .........

(PEOPLE)C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE DESIRED FACILITY ..............................($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT.......................................~($000)


I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... sep 86

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 35c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... oct 87

2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES X NOb. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)

a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. apr 88

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 12

1DEC 16 UNTIL EXHAUSTED"'4 E t

1. COMPONENT . DATE

ARMY IFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,jAN 19873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

MAINZ

Germany Facilitization at Mainz Army Depot

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST IS0001TEMP

0 00QQ ( G 9200Q6 5.3009. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M OUANTITY UNIT CO00COST ($OwlI

PRIMARY FACILITY 4,722

Maintenance Preparation Complex (Gonsenheim SF 26,550 119.20( 3,165)

Light Veh Inspection Facility (Mombach) SF 9,920 92.44( 917)

Chem/POL/Acid Storage Building (Gonsenheim) SF 11,828 54.13( 640)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 4,722

CONTINGENCY PERCENT ( 5.00%) 236


SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (6.50%) 322

TOTAL REQUEST 5,280



10. ODecration of Propomd Construction

The primary facility to support combat vehicle maintenance at MZAD will

require dismantling of existing buildings and erection of new facilities.

Basic construction will be of reinforced concrete skeleton and in all cases

will be site adapted to existing facilities. In addition, the project will

include required utility services, emergency lighting, water purification

treatment, compressed air, fire alarm and extinguishing system, partition

walls and roof modifications. The hardstands and foundations will be of

*[ reinforced concrete.i

REQUIREMENT : ADEQUATE: SUBSTD:

As the Army's Force Modernization Program continues to be implemented

throughout USAREUR, the workload in depot level maintenance will also

increase. This is due to the increased sophistication of the new systems,

the increased equipment density within the Theater, the numerous items

displaced to War Reserve or POMCUS status, and conversion to new equipment

configurations. This will occur in all commodity areas. For most

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD oic 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO, 13

%.


AMY FY 19 8 9 MILiTARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2 . 987ARMY 1987 ,

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMAINZGermany

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER'EMP


REQUIREMENT (CONT)..

commodities, shipment to CONUS for repair is extremely costly. This isparticularly true of Combat Vehicles which are bulky and heavy. In addition,CONUS repair requires that additional items, either end items or secondaryitems, be procured to increase the repair cycle float by the amount of theturn around required. The most economical approach to accomplish theexpanding depot level workload for combat vehicles in USAREUR (and meetAMC's concept for depot level maintenance support in Europe) is tofacilitize the MZAD site, thereby providing sufficient space tooverhaul/repair combat vehicles.

CURRENT SITUATION :The Mainz Army Depot is a very physically constrained facility. The workloadrequired for the repair/overhaul of new systems cannot be met withoutmodernizing the existing depot by replacing existing temp.)rary facilitieswith permanent structures and modernizing and expanding support facilities.Mainz is tasked with maintaining, at depot level, Army Combat/Tacticalvehicles, missiles and Communication and Electronics in Europe. The onlyreasonable alternatives to utilizing Mainz is to transfer all repairablecombat vehicles and components of vehicles in Europe to a CONUS depot orcontractor for the repair/overhaul. These alternatives and the extremelycostly maintenance float requirement for combat vehicles and componentswould cause the US Government to lose all benefits to be gained fromexisting facilities and IPE at MZAD in relation to the combat vehicle fleet.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :Should this project not be approved, Mainz would be unable to satisfy therepair/overhaul requirements. Failure to provide for the OCONUS maintenanceof the USAREUR combat vehicle fleet will result in a significant degradationin the combat readiness of USAREUR or require costly second destinationtransportation of vehicles and components and necessitates having anextensive maintenance float in Europe. This facility project is necessary tomeet an imminent demand for repair/overhaul capability. Delay of the project

..

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 14

a ,, "e ". e -'

1. COMPWONENT 2. DATEARMY FY 198 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA j2D 1987

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMAINZGermany



will require that interim inefficient (and therefore costly) means beemployed to attempt to satisfy the repair/overhaul requirements.

.r

WILLIAM S. LITTLEFIELDCOLCommander


k.

J..

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 15

%

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE19FY 8_%.9MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHAINZ

=4 Germany

-4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMP


SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY



C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY ..............................



REPLACEMENT ............................ ........

($000)'4.


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... DEC 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100

c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... DEC 87

2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES NO


.. COST (TOTAL - $000)

a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS .............

b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................

c. TOTAL COST (c) - (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ..........................e. IN HOUSE ...................................


DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 1b1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

1. COMPONENT . DATE

FY 19 39 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA '1987ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

Lima Army Tank Plant PSE Construction

011 ioS. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUM@ER S. PROJECT COST M00

&6,000

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY coT - I- OeT

PRIMIARY FACILITY 5,413

1. Water 'lain System Upgrade LS - - - - - - (1,339)

2. Lighting System Upgrade (1.900)

3. Addition to Bldg. 317 SF 21,800 99.72 (2,174)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 5, 13



- SLOb (5.6i) 313TOTAL REQUEST 6,001TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED 6,00010. Dcription of Propoed Constriction

Upgrades water main system capacity by replacement of inadequate piping

and fixtures, separating domestic and fire water supplv systems, and expanding

xisting water system to provide fire protection to production support buildings

hroughout the installation.

Upgrades lighting system in the main production building by providing

mergencv lighting, replacement of existing light fixtures, and corrects

electrical power factor.

m-

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY E USED INTERNALLYDO ! oEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGENG. 17

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 198_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987

ARMY


Limna Army Tank Plant Ohio


Provides addition to existing building :317. New construction will be

insulated metal roof and walls aad reinforced concrete floor. Requires

,; heating and ventilation systems, exhaust system, electrical, plumbing,

telephone, nd fire sprinkler systems. Includes vehicle wash booth, overhead

cranes, and Locomotivt: service pit.

1I. REQUIRE-1ENTProject: Upgrades water main system and electrical lighting to correct

oShA, NFPA, and DOD Safety deficiencies. Completes plant fire loop to provide

I ) - i r fire prctecriun. rmpro.es I :v& tir in nroduction zirea anl

'rovi.s emergencyc lighting for egress :ro. nroj1:ction hjilding durin8; power

failure. Consolidates maintenance area for plant Support equipment and

upgrades battery and corrosives storage area.

Requ:irement:

.>' e::pansio-is durnri "Y85 to present have added production

space. Water system has not e,.:inded with the rest of the facility and is

in violation of NFPA codes which specify that domestic and fire water sys Lis

be separate. Electrical lighting provides inadequate illumination to the

production floor with no means of emergency lighting to illuminate egrese

routes from the production area. Space to maintain plant support eauipment

and vehicles is inadequate. These vehicles include forklifts, diesel and

gasoline powered trucks, and a locomotive. Batteries are maintained for

rebuild and/or recharge and exchange for electrical powered vehicles.

Corrosives are stored for maintenance operations.

Current Situation:

The current water svstem does not meet NFPA codes. Pining and

fixtures are inadequate to meet fire protection requirements. homestic and

fire water systems are combined and are "dead end" sste:,s with ni'." a singli

source of water. The electrical lighting system requires maintenance anu

relamping to provide adequate light to the production r loor. No emergency

DD ore 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 7 1 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 'AN 1987-- ARM Y


Lima Army Tank Plant Ohio


PSER Construction 76 '37

lighting exists. Maintenance for plant vehicles is done at various locations

throughout the plant and outside on hardstands. battery storage and corrosivi

storage areas are in violation of OSHA, NFPA, and DOD Safety codes.

Impact If Not Provided:

Plant will remain in violation of OSHA, NFPA, and DOD Safety

codes. The water system will require extensive maintensnce to remain useful.

Water for fire protection will not be available at sufficient pressures..

Lighting will remain inadequate.

ELTON J. NINNEYLTC, OrdC

Commanding

", V2

4' .%"

....

p.

DD n~u1 ,.1, PREVIOUS EDITIONS MA' SiE USED) INlrERINALLYI DEC 76 I11C UNTIL EXHAUSI"ED PAGE NO. 1-9

.1L

" 9,..', -. . - . .. = , . ,% .- . . ,' '.,.. '. '" ' . - . " " ' . " '' '' % . '' " ' "s"i , --,-,-,i.,.i£ .- ' • ~ • . .* ... . .... ; .: v : - : % ; - - -

"


FY 19.LIMILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA J i 987ARMY


Lima Army Tank Plant Ohio


PSER Construction

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY .........


THE DESIRED FACILITY ..............................



($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... DEC 86

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100


2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES NOb. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:


b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

APR 394. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) ..............

DD ORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

.1A

SDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/1989


APPROPRIATION: Procurement of Ammunition, Army

ACTIVITY 2 - Production Base Support

Army Ammunition Cost Estimate PageInstallation Project No. Project Title ($000) No.

Louisiana Army 5885314-13 Replacement 1.250 23PT, Louisiana Repl Bridge &

Trestles

Kansas Army 5885329-21 New 700 Line .560 26Plant, Kansas Steam Gen Plant

Louisiana Army 5882800-18 Intrusion Alarm 1.900 29PT, Louisiana System

Holston Army 5885328-17 Addition Overfire .800 33PT, Tennessee Systems

Indiana PT, 5885330-15 Additon Shiphse/ .440 36Indiana Roads PHS IV

Holston Army PT, 5882439D Modernization MOD 1.700 4.Tennessee Bldg N-3 for A-5

Drying

Louisiana Army 5885314-21 Replacement Repl .590 44PT, Louisiana Barricades, Area D

Milan Army Plant, 588317-19 Cond & Stg Fac .540 47Tennessee Area ZZ

Radford Army 5885326-16 Replacement 1.000 50PT, Virginia Replacement (5)Barricades

Radford Army 5882700-2 Replacement .540 53PT, Virginia Replace

Barricades atExplosive Op

Twin Cities Army 5882800-8 Modernization 2.600 56.4 PT, Minnesota Igloo Storage

21


FY 1988 - PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT(Cont'd)



Army hunnition Cost Estimate PageInstallation ProJect No. Project Title ($000) No.

Lone Star Army Modernization .550 59PT, Texas Chem Lab

Rehabilitation

Ravenna Army Modernization 2.600 64PT, Ohio Intru Alarm Sys/

Locks/Hasps

Votunteer Army 5882800 Modernization .740 68A PT, Tennessee Security Fencing

Lake City Army Ammo Plant 2800-07 Security 1.150 72

Missouri Improvements

22

" il

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY I.J, ,19

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mob i Group 1

LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT REPLACEMENT

Louisiana REPL BRIDGE & TRESTLES

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT S. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER . PROJECT COST IS0001TEMP

860 30 5314-13 1,2509. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UI/M QUANTITY COST CS0$COST 4


BRIDGES & TRESTLES LS .. .. ( 1,082)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

',F

.1

SUBTOTAL 1,082




TOTAL REQUEST 1,255

A TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,250


10. Dcnrption of Propomd Construction

Replace four wooden highway bridges. New bridges will be concrete or

concrete boxed culverts as appropriate. Bridges

will meet AASHO capacity rating of HS 20-44. PReplace eight rawooden

railroad trestles. New trestles will be steel or concrete as appropriate.

Trestles will meet COOPER E45 rating per TM 5-370.

11. REQUIREMENT: 25 MI ADEQUATE: 6 MI SUBSTD: 19 MI

PROJECT

THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE REPLACEMENT FOR FOUR BRIDGES AND EIGHT

TRESTLES INCLUDING HEADWALLS, WING WALLS, AND APPROACH AS NECESSARY TO

PROVIDE STRUCTURES WITH APPROPRIATE LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITY.

,.'

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO 1 DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 213

% %N 4 s

1. COMPONENT 2. DAT. ."

FY 198 _MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTLouis iana4. PROJECT TItk LIEi l ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

REPLACEMENT TEMP

REQUIREMENT

EXISTING BRIDGES AND TRESTLES ARE WOOD STRUCTURES OF 1941-42 VINTAGE.THESE UNITS ARE DECAYING. INSPECTIONS BY THE CONSULTING FIRM OF AILLET,FENNER, JOLLY AND MCCLELLAND, INC AND FESA SHOW THAT THERE IS ADVANCEDSTAGES OF DECAY IN THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND THE PIL[NG.

CURRENT SITUATION :

LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY ON EXISTING STRUCTURES HAS BEEN REDUCED. EACHSTRUCTURE WILL BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY AND LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY ADJUSTEDACCORDING TO THE SAFE LOADING CAPACITY.

AIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :

FAILURE TO APPROVE THIS PROJECT WILL RESULT IN BRIDGES AND TRESTLESFAILING TO THE POINT THEY ARE UNSAFE TO CROSS. IF A BRIDGE OR TRESTLE FAILSIT MAY ELIMINATE ACCESS TO THE SECTION OF THE INSTALLATION WHICH THATSTRUCTURE SERVES.

ADDITIONAL

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FORMAT B HAS BEEN SUBMITTED.

GARY F. ANDREWLTC, OrdCCOMMANDING

V ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: MAY 1988 INDEX: 1580ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: MAY 1989 INDEX: 1627ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: JUNE 1990 INDEX: 1674

4.

DD FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

O iDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 24

I -.. V. V ,,t;..{4 ,1 , ,'* - . ,.. n ,~, . . ':' , ,o , " -** . -. -. . . -.. . . - . ./ .. ,?


A FY 19 8 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA '87ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTLouisiana

4. PROJECT TIYbilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEMPREPL BRIDGE & TRESTLES 5314-13

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 4,000




THE DESIRED FACILITY .............................. $100,000($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ........................... 010885b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ...................... 301287


b. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:NOT USED



4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. 300388

FORM 1PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY_ D 1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 25

-.0,-

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEARMY FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1;I i7

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKansas NEW 700 LINE STEAM GEN PLT

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMSER 8. PROJECT COST ISM)

TEMP

821 22 51291 L*q., 9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST

PRIMARY FACILITY 505Steam Generating Plant LS ( 505)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 505CONTINGENCY PERCENT (5.00%) 25TOTAL CONTRACT COST 530SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (5.50%) 29

T?; ,TAL REQUEST 559TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 560INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. OD.erption of Proposed Conitruction

Construct a new metal boiler house in 700 Area complete with new boilers andrelated equipment.

11. REQUIREMENT:27,000,000 MB ADEQUATE: MB SUBSTD: 0 MB* PROJECT :

Construct new boiler house, 700 Area.

REQUIREMENTThis project is required to replace the old 1941-42 steam generating systemwith system of high energy, multiple pass, steam generators capable ofproducing a total of 27,000,000 BTU per hour. Project to include allancillary equipment.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY 8E uSEO IPTEANALLYDD ,oc 7 6 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO .A)

4"

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1 8 8MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987

SARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

KANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKansas


NEW 700 LINE STEAM GEN PLT 532921

CURRENT SITUATION :This old boiler house and steam generating equipment is deteriorated to a

condition which is no longer feasible to repair.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :If not replaced the aging system will continue to require prohibitive

maintenance costs to remain in service. System failure results ininsufficient process steam to sustain production.

S/ CHARLES T. WALLSCHLAEGER

4 / CHARLES T. WALLSCHLAEGER

LTC, OrdC

Command ing


ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: 1605


DOFORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

DD0EC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 27

e4


FY 198 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1 87ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKansas4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

TEMP

NEW 700 LINE STEAM GEN PLT 532921

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITYi($000)

B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY

OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY .........~( PEOPLE )



D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A

REPLACEMENT........................................


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ......................... .Mar 86

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987 70c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ............................ Mar 87


3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........

d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE.....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. Apr 88

DO FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYO 1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 8

9z-

4, %J- ~. 1

1. COMPONENT OATSFY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY JAN

K3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION PROJECT TITLE moitroupILOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Louisiana Intrusion Alarm SystemS. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER .PROJECT COST 4$0001

TEMPQ ' Rn An )Ann-IB 1.900

6 COST SSrr

ITEM LWM QUA061V coIST I


Intrusion Detection System, Area BY 4S 3383 ( 1,658)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

p,.

SUBTOTAL 1,658




TOTAL REQUEST 1,924



10. Oescrtoo of Proposed ConstnIction

Project will provide intrusion detection system for 49 magazines in Area

L-3. Each magazine will be equipped to provide a signal to guard

headquarters by multiplexed equipment which will monitor over hardwire and

fiber optic cable. Primary electrical power and an external light will be

provided to each igloo.

REQUIREMENT 49 BX ADEQUATE: 0 BX SUBSTD: 174 BX

AR 190-11, Para 3-13 requires magazines to be equipped with intrusion

-detectors if not under continuous surveillance by approved means. This

project upgrades security protection for sensitive munitions storage. This

FORM PREV#OUS EOITIONS MAY BE USIEO INTERNALLY

DD I DOEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTEO PAGE NO. .9

ie-d

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Louisiana4. PROJECTTI7bbilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NlIMM

TEMP

Intrusion Alarm System 2800-1B


project is required to prevent unauthorized entry of individuals in thesensitive storage areas for purpose of theft, sabotage, or other similarcriminal acts.

CURRENT SITUATION

Current need is being met by alternative measures allowed by AR 190-11.

SECURITY IS CURRENTLY ACCOMPLISHED BY MEASURES REQUIRED IN THE ABSENCE OFAN IDS SYSTEM.

CURRENTLY, A GUARD CHECKS EACH IGLOO; HOWEVER, APPROXIMATELY TWO HOURS ISREQUIRED TO MAKE A FULL INSPECTION. THIS MEANS THAT AN INTRUSION CAN GOUNDETECTED FOR APPROXIMATELY 2 HRS. CURRENT OPERATION IS UNDER WAIVERPWS-SMCLA-1 -84.


If this project is not approved, compliance with AR 190-11 cannot beachieved.

ADDITIONAL

SPECIFIC MOBILIZATION REQUIREMENT:

THIS SCOPE OF WORK IS A CURRENT REQUIREMENT TO COMPLY WITH REFERENCES IN

PARA 1l.M

AN EXEMPTION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IS REQUESTED INACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF AR 11-28, PARA 1-3D(3). REGULATIONS WHICHSUPPORT THIS REQUEST ARE LISTED IN PARA ll.M.

p.


'"4D" 'I" .-." " ' .-... ' ' . - -" : ." .' ""'. " """ .,:" - " -.'" -C ' C- '


ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Louisiana

TFAIN

4. PROJECT Tl iIil ization Group I S. PROJECT NUMBER

Intrusion Alarm System I RfAn-IRTEMP

PROVISIONING OF THESE FACILITIES HAS BEEN DIRECTED BY GOVERNMENT;THEREFORE, PROPER IDS FACILITIES MUST ACCOMPANY THE DIRECTIVE.

// GARY F. ANDREWGARY F. ANDREW

,

LTC, ORDC

COMMANDING


, ..

..

'D

D FO R M 1 9 cPR

EV N S E D IT IO N S M A Y B E U SED IN T E R N A L LY

1E0

.

'os

ID C7 3 1

N I X A SE.A

EN .3

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 8 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY " !

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Louis iana4. PROJECT Tl;ilizition Group 1 S. PPi;JECT NJMBIER

TEMPIntrusion Alarm System 2800-IB

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA








($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .......................... OCT 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. hATE DESIGN COMPLETED .................... DEC 86


N/A


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT .....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. \PR 88

o DD 1FORM 13 9 1c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDDIDEC 76 19cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 32

I

1. COMPON4ENT 882. OA![!

I MY FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. j DA8

3. INITALLATtON AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT Addition

Tennessee Overfire Air Systems

S. R OGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMIER 8. PROJECT COST SO=TEMP

821 10 5328-17 800

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST 41100O11

OVERFIRE AIR SYSTEMS LS .. .. 719)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 719

CONTINGENCY PERCENT(5.OO%) 36

TOTAL CONTRACT COST 755

SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD 5.60') 42

TOTAL REQUEST 797

TOTAL REQUEST K ROUNDED) 300


10. Dscription of Proposed Con~structionb.".

Install overfire air systems on Boilers , #5, ind 4h. Building f8, Area

A; and on Boiler #4, Building #200, Area B 'Steam PIintLs' Each system will

consist of an air mover (fan), piping, nozzles, and controls to provide

independent operation for each stoker fired boiler. A ste-am turbine driver

will be installed on the overfire air fan of Boiler :ki, Bldg 200 as an

energy saving measure. Because of equipment pculiariti,+s, the energy saving

measure is only economical on Boiler #4. This is the+1 1;t )f an ongoing

program to install overfire air on each of the Hoisto)n AAP Utoker fired

boilers.

11 REV WIREMENT: MB ADEQ[A E: FF I, 1': : B" I' R' JE (T:

FO M PREVIOUS EOITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD I DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 33

eitI.

S . %Io . -


FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,987ARMY I

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE S. PROJECT NUMBERAdd i tion TEMP

Overfire Air Systems 5328-17

PROJECT (CONT)..

This project is to install overfire air systems on four steam boilers atHolston AAP and to add a steam turbine driver on one system.

REQUIREMENT

This project is required to reduce air pollution (visible stack

emissiors), to improve efficiency of boiler operations, and in one case(Boiler 4) to save energy.

CURRENT SITUATION

Presently insufficient overfire ir result; in incomplete combustion offuel (coal); th rby increasLt1g fly ash load on electrostatic precipitatorsthat result in air pollution. Based on evaluation of existing overfire air

systems the advantages are; reduced carbon carryover; reduced particle dustloading in precipitator hoppers; reduced probability of fire in fly ashsilos and increased boiler efficiency.

IMPACT "F N61F PROVIDED

Particulate emissions will occassionally exceed allowable EPA limitationsat loads between 30 and 100 percent boiler capacity. Also, boiler efficiencywil I not be improvod if this project is not funded.

/S/ JAMES F. BALD, JR% JAMES F. BALD, JR%' LTC, OD

Commander

-. MATE r '1;.TRI',TltI N START: .\PR I11 1 ,8 INDEX: 1575ES IA.FED ,DP'INT rF (,iNSTR1'(:Tn1 N: J..\N'ARY I9M9 INDEX: 1616

r; . [0,N 0(MPIFI N: ',)B R INDEX: 1650

'ORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

1 DEC 7,, UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 346I

.: .. ,. v .',. ..... .. . ," ." . ." , ,: / -". - ,' ' - " ;. ~

I. COMPONENT 2. DATE, 1887

FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY


HOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PTTennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERAdd it ion TEMP

Overfire Air Systems 5328-17

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY UNK


OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY......... 0


THE DESIRED FACILITY ........................................... UNK($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT ....................................... NA

($000)


I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .......................... NOV 85

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 95c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... NOV 86


HOLSTON

Id 3. COST (TOTAL - $000)

a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ..................................... .45c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 45d. CONTRACT ..................................................... 45e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) APR 88

DO FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY -DEC76 13 9 1c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 3

I=!7

FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA . , 197ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION . PROJECT TITLE Mobil Group 1INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT Addition

Indiana Shiphse/Rds-Phase IV

&. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE . PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST I=000)

TEMP421 81 5330/15 440

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITYCOST (SCOOP

PRIMARY FACILITY 396

Shiphse/Rds-Phase IV SF 35,369 7.04( 396)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 396CONTINGENCY PERCENr (10.00%) 20


SUPERVISION, INSPECT S OVHD (5.50%) 23TOTAL REQUEST 439

TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 440


10. Degcroption of Pro osed Contnxction

Phase IV will provide for the building of access roads, the purchase of one

portable ramp and the reinforcing of floors to sixteen (16) rail shiphouses.

11. REQUIREMENT: 155,283 SF ADEQUATE: 81,712 SF SUBSTD: 73,571 SF

,- PROJECTTo convert sixteen (16) limited access Rail shiphouses to prime explosive

storage locations.

REQUIREMENT :Access roads are needed for trailer truck access to existing shiphouses that

- have only rail access, for end-product storage requirements.

CURRENT SITUATION

Currently, the shiphouses are loaded in two stages. First, by manual

transfer of propellant from an intraplant trailer to a rail )itney car and

then by manual transfer from the jitney car into the shiphouse. Direct

'4, oMq PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY OE USED INTERNALLYDD , oic 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAG NO. 36

e%; O,


FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Indiana

4. PROJECT TI b6il izat ion Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

Addition TEMPShiphse/Rds-Phase IV 5320/I 5

CURRENT SITUATION : (CONT)..

trailer access eliminates one transfer operation. Floor reinforcement isrequired for forklift transfer of goods.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :

Failure to provide this project will necessitate the continued costly

manipulating and rewarehousing of explosive inventories. Additional hiringof material handling personnel will be required to keep up with the rate of

Class 1.3 storage turnover and more people than necessary will be exposed tohazards of manually handling explosives. Critically needed prime explosivestorage space to comply with the ballistic acceptance procedures in SB

742-1, ammunition surveillance procedures for finished goods produce will be

lacking at INAAP if this project is not provided.

ADDITIONAL

It is estimated that an annual savings of $355,972 will be realized.Presently, INAAP has 238 Class 1.3 facilities. Increased production

schedules for 1986-88 will require that all 238 Class 1.3 facilities be

utilized equally and that an estimated 1,217 load or unload operations will

be required annually. Additionally, approximately 150 hours will be savedfor quality assurance, content surveillance, inventory check and maintenancepersonnel.

/S/ TRANNIE W. SANDERSON

TRANNIE W. SANDERSON

LTC, CM

Command ing


ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: 1605ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623

DO FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. J7

1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

a-%

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA "

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Ind iana4. PROJECT TIl&Eilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAddit ion TEMPShiDhse/Rds-Phase IV 5330/15

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 0(SOOO)



C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY .............................................. 0

($000)


REPLACEMENT ....................................... 0($000)


t. STArUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED. ..................... FEB 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... DEC 86


INAAP


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ..................................... 21

c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 21d. CONTRACT .................................... 12e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 9

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. JUN 88

%'

%.

.


. .,. .

'p

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 9N 1987

ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTIndiana4. PROJECT TI-IYL* i l i z a t i o n Group 1 5 PROJECT NUMBERAdd it ion TEMP

. "Shiphse/Rds-Phase IV 5330/15

F. EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BE

PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS

EQUIPMENT PROCURING FY OF COST

NOMENCLATURE APPROPRIATION APPROP ($000)

%. Portable Ramps (1) PA, A 4211 88 16.6

,N'

,. "N

p'.

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

1D 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 39

.4'-elP


FY 1988_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ..;' ,."ARMY I

HOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11220

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernizat ionMOD Bldg N-3 for A-5 Drying 0073000





Drying Process PAA 1987 2,900

Equipment

% %

,-%

.-p.

* we

€ FORM 19cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD 1 DEC76 1 9cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 40

,@4°

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEARMY FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JNIT,.'ARMY 1987

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

HOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11220 ModernizationTennessee MOD Bldg N-3 for A-5 Drying

-. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST ($0001

78011A 226 90 0073000 1,7009. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST (11000)


New Construction LS- ( 1,522

SUPPORT FACILITIES 115

Utilities, Paving, Walks LS -- 115

SUBTOTAL 1,522

CONTINGENCY PERCENT ( 5.00%) 76TOTAL CONTRACT COST 1,598


TOTAL REQUEST 1,687


INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP ( 2,900

10. Description of Proposed Construction

New construction, alterations, support facilities and utilities asrequired to modernize A-5 Drying Process.

' 11. REQUIREMENT: 0 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 0 SFPROJECT

Modernize Composition A-5 Drying Process.

REQUIREMENT

This project is required to modernize an existing drying process to reduce

labor and operating space requirements and make existing facilitiesavailable for production of other A-Compositions and PBX-Compositions. The

propose& moderrnization is needed to meet FYDP production requirements.

FOR CM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY0DO , DC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

[%'


FY 198 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY I -

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11220Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModerniza tionMOD Bldg N-3 for A-5 Drying 0073000

CURRENT SITUATION

Composition A-5 explosive is now Iried using drying beds which requireextra labor, utilities and facilty -pace. The plant cannot meet the FYDPproduction requirements without additional, faster drying methods. The FYDPproduction for Composition A-- .lone would require all existing drying beds.


If this project is not provided, the plant cannot meet the FYDPproduction requirements and excessive operating costs will continue kc r the

e explosive prod,--- using the existing drying bed process.

/S/ JAXES F. BALD, JR

j%MES F. BALD, JRLTC, ODCommand ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: JULY 1988 INDEX: 1590ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: AUGUST 1989 INDEX: 1640ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1990 INDEX: 1686V

4.,

D FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 42.. DEC-76

- 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 7ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11220

Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERA Moderniza t on

NO MOD Bldg N-3 for A-5 Drying 0073000

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 505,'. ($000)




THE DESIRED FACILITY .................................... 4798($000)


REPLACEMENT ....................................... 9281

($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ......................... JAN 86

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 [987.. 50

.c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... M.AR 87


, NA


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS .............. 40b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ..................................... 70c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 110

d. CONTRACT ..................................................... 77

e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 33

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. FEB 88

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 431 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

I' '., r '< - . ' . , ' ;. . •. ">." . . " '-...,," . ". ."-"""" , " :, =., ,'

ARCMYOEN FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.OAI 83. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE 1 itroup

LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT REPLACEMENT

Louisiana I REPL BARRICADES, AREA D

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER B. PROJECT COST IS=)0

TEMP

149 30 15314-21 5909. COST ESTIMATES

UNIT Coal*ITEM LJ/M QUANTITY COST I0001

PRIMARY FACILITY

SUJPPORT FACILITIE- 506

Other LS - - 506)

SUBTOTAL 5061

CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 51TOTAL CONTRACT COST 557SUPERVIS ION, NSPECT & QVHD ( 5.50*') 31TOTAL REQUEST 588


INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP (0)

10. Do.creptiont of Proposed Construction

Remove and replace four barricades at explosives production support

buildings (D-1220 and D-1222). Existing structures are wooden revetted and

earth filled, 15 ft high by various lengths.

11. REQUIREMENT: EA ADEQUATE: 0 EA SUBSTD: 535 EA

PROJECT :Remove existing deteriorated barricades and replace with new structures 15

ft high x 48 ft wide x various lengths (220 or 315 ft long). Barricades will

meet criteria established by ANC-R 385-100.

REQUIREMENT

Barricades are required to provide adequate explosion protection for

personnel and fac II ities in accordance wi th AMC-R 385-100. Current

* barricades meet safety requirements but r-,qui re ox t-nsiv e mai ntenance

bec ua se o f d t erio r at Lon .

FORM PREVIOUJS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO 0EC76s 1391 UNTIL EXH"AUSTED PAGE No. 44

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTLouisiana4. PROJECT Tlftiil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

REPLACEMENT TEMPREPL BARRICADES, AREA D 514-

CURRENT SITUATIONExisting earthen barricades are supported by wood pilings and timberheaders. The wooden support structure are severely rotted and willultimately allow the barricade to fall. Repair of the revetment structurewas considered but determined not to be feasible.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDFailure to approve this project will ultimately result in the collapsing ofexisting barricades. Production will be restricted due to inadequateexplosion protection for workers and facilities. Plant will not be able tooperate with current quantity/distance limitations.

ADDITIONALExplosion protection barricades protect workers, buildings and productionequipment and prevent propogation of blast to other explosive productionbuildings in case of a mishap.

GARY F. ANDREW

LTC, OrdCCOMMANDING

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: MARCH 1988 INDEX: 1572ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JUNE 1988 INDEX: 1585ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1988 INDEX: 1600

DD FORM 13 91c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 4-)

1w%


FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA % 1987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTLoui s iana

4. PROJECTTI1Rbbilization Group I 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLdICEMENT TEMP

REPL BARRICADES, AREA D 5314-21

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA





($000)


REPLACEMENT .......................................($000;

i. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

1. STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED .............. ........... 010985b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100

c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... 301287



LOUISIANA AAP


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................

c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................

e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. 150388

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 46

1 COMPONENT D. A'1-RM FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA DATI

"ARMY I'

S. 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEMILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

Tennessee COND. & STG. FAC AREA ZZ

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMIER PLG.ECT e (4TEMP

000 00 5317-19 540

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY S.-.


COND. & STG. FAC AREA ZZ LS .. .. 485)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 485



SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD ( 5.60%) 29

TOTAL REQUEST 538TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 540INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Dearotion of Propomed Contruetion

WORK CONSISTS OF PROVIDING FOUR (4) EARTH COVERED MAGAZINES. THREE (3) SMALL

MAGAZINES WILL BE USED TO STORE EXPLOSIVE COMPONENT6 OF DIFFERENT -

COMPATABILITY GROUPINGS WHILE AWAITING TESTING. ONE (1) MAGAZINE WILL BE

USED TO HOUSE CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT WHERE AMMUNITION COMPONENTS ARE

J... CONDITIONED PRIOR TO TESTING. NO OLD FACILITIES WILL BE DEMOLISHED.

" CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT SITED WITHIN A FLOOD PLAIN.

11. REQUIREMENT: 750 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECTSTORAGE AND CONDITIONING SPACE, WHERE STORAGE COMPATIBILITY OF AMMUNITION,

EXPLOSIVE COMPONENTS AND EXPLOSIVES WILL NOT BE A PROBLEM AND SECURITY OF

ALL ITEMS WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED.

i FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYA1DO , oEC 74 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 47

-.-.-


FY 198 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTTennessee


COND. & STG. FAC AREA ZZ 5317-19

REQUIREMENT:

TO CORRECT SECURITY DEFICIENCIES WITH REGUARD TO EXISTING FACILITIESCURRENTLY UTILIZED FOR STORAGE OF AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVIES AND TEST WEAPONS.NEW FACILITIES ARE ALSO NEEDED TO CONSOLIDATE THE LOCATION OF CONDITIONING

EQUIP- MENT AND RESOLVE COMPATIBILITY PROBLEMS.

CURRENT SITUATION :

TEMPORARY SECURITY MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ALLOW LIMITED STORAGE OF TESTWEAPONS AS WELL AS SOME AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES IN EXISTING TEST AREA

FACILITIES. THIS TEMPORARY CONDITION CAUSES EXTRA OPERATING REQUIREMENTS

THAT IMPEDE TEST AREA FUNCTIONS.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDPROBLEMS C C'RNN(; SECL'RIFY, STORAGE COMPATIBILITY AS WELL AS IAMTrED

S fORAGE SPACE COULD RESULT IN THE SUSPENSION OF SOME ACTIVITIES AT THF TESTAREA.

'"F ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1988 INDEX: 1575ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: 1605ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623

I

d

FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD I DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 48


ARMY FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTTennessee


COND. & STG. FAC AREA ZZ 5317-19

%-.

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY.........(PEOPLE)

, C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY ..............................



REPLACEMENT .......................................($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ............................. 21JU ,36

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 95

c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ........................ J 37


ee


'ma

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS...............


c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) ..............

DD FORM191 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYIDEC 76 11cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

,:J,

- . . .K.,DD OR .....-.REIOU.EITINSMA...U....TERA....4

I. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA , is. /ARMY ..

3. INSTA.LATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mo i 1Group IRadford Army Ammunition Pt REPLACEMENTVirginia REPLACE FIVE (5) BARRICADES

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMIER 8. PROJECT COST IS=0)" TEM P

226 80 532616 1000

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M aUANTITY COST

RIMARY FACILITY 885

REPLACE 5 BARRICADES LS -- ( 885)

SUPPORr FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 885CONTINGENCY PERCENT 5.00;) 45

TOTAL CONTRACT Cc ST 930SUPERVISION, [NSPr2-T & OVHD (5.50%) 50TOTAL REQUEST 980TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,000

INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP


COMPLETELY REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT BARRICADES FOR FIVE (5) ACTIVE PROPELLANT

OPERATING BUILDINGS. NOT SITED IN A FLOOD PLAIN.

11. REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT :REPLACE jj'O MULTI-STORY AND THREE SINGLE-STORY, DOUBLE REVETTED WOODEN,EARTH FILLED BARRICADES WITH ONE MULTI-STORY AND FOUR SINGLE-STORYBARRICADES. THE PROJECT MUST REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL UTILITIES, PROCESS PIPINGAND DUCTWORK PASSING THROUGH OR ATTACHED TO THE BARRICADES. ALSO, THE FLOORS

AND ROOFS THROUGH THE BARRICADE PORTALS ARE TO BE REPLACED. DETERIORATEDESCAPE CHUTES AND SUPPORT FRAMING ARE TO BE REPLACED AND THE SURFACE

DRAINAGE IS TO BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE BARRICADE FOUNDATION. UPGRADE THE

ELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND WIRING TO MEET THE LATESr CODES. NOTE: RATHER THAN

UPGRADE THE 1940'S OPEN WIRING AND NONCONFORMING ELECTRICAL AT ALL THEFACILITIES AT RAAP AT ONE TIME, IT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN DECIDED TO CORRECTTHE CONDITIONS WHEN MAJOR WORK IS PERFORMED ON INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS. NEW

F 00M PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO.DD I DEC ?ei 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTEO

!I * D D.~ & 1

r,-~


I FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA , 1987. ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRad ford Army Ammunition PtVirginia

4. PROJECT Tilltkil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEMPREPLACE FIVE (5) BARRICADES 532616

PROJECT : (CONT)..

WIRING AND CONDUIT ON BARRICADES CORRECTS THE MAJORITY OF THE REQUIREMENTS.

REQUIREMENT :THIS PROJECT IS THE NINTH PHASE OF AN ANNUAL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR THEBARRICADES AT THIS PLANT WHICH WERE ERECTED IN THE 1940-41 PERIOD.THIRTY-THREE BARRICADES IN PHASE I (FY-80) THROUGH PHASE V (FY-84) HAVE BEENCOMPLETED. REPAIRS TO MANY OF THESE BARRICADES HAVE BECOME EXCESSIVE ANDCANNOT KEEP UP WITH THE RATE OF DETERIORATION, AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITYCANNOT BE ASSURED.

CURRENT SITUATION

240 BARRICADES ARE REQUIRED AT THIS PLANT TO MEET CURRENT PRODUCTIONSCHEDULES AND FOR MOBILIZATION. A PORTION OF THESE CAN BE MAINTAINED FOR THENEXT 20 YEARS. THE REMAINING ONES SHOULD BE REPLACED BECAUSE OF DECAYING OFTHE MAJOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. A REPLACEMENT PROGRAM HAS BEEN STARTED TORENEW THE BARRICADES AT THESE BUILDINGS, A FEW EACH YEAR, BEGINNING WITH THEONES THAT ARE IN GREATEST NEED OF REPLACEMENT.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDWITHOUT ADEQUATE BARRICADES, RAAP COULD NOT CONTINUE TO OPERATE WITHINEXISTING INTRALINE QUANTITY DISTANCES.

ADDITIONAL

NOT REQUIRED.

G. J. Savitske

LTC, CMLCCOMMANDER

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: MAY 1988 INDEX: 1608ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JANUARY 1989 INDEX: 1655ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1989 INDEX: 1694

DD FORM 13 91c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 51

%

.b -

,'-..' . ..... .. . . ~~ ~ ~. ." ". J. ."-",-,e*-. ,- 4**#. " . 'CC, i . = i" . ," - - , e ' : - ,' t . =.

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA jgA 1297:i ~3 ARMY ..

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRadford Army Ammunition PtVir2 inia4. PROJECT TI &Kil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEP

REPLACE FIVE (5) BARRICADES 532616

L-I

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 0(SOO)

B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRYOUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY 0

(PEOPLE)


($000)


REPLACEMENT ....................................... 0

($000)


I . STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED ............... .......... Jul 85


c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER I 1987 100

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... .Mar 87


".


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................



DD FORM 13 91c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 52

iFb.

1 CO.MCONENT 2. OAT!AM FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2 DTj 7

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE MobilGroup 1Radford Army Ammunition Pt Replacement

Virginia Replace Barricades at Explosive Op

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST (S=00)TEMP

226 80 2700-02 5409. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ISOOO)

PRIMARY FACILITY 465Replace Barricades LS 465)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 465


TOTAL CONTRACT COST -12


TOTAL REQUEST 540



10. DKription of Proposed Contrunction

Completely remove and re-construct barricades for three (3) active

propellant operating buildings. Not sited in a flood plain.

-i. REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT

Replace one multi-story and two single-story, double revetted wooden, earth

filled barricades with oe multi-story and two single-story barricades. The

project must remove and re-install utilities, process piping and ductwork

passing through or attached to the barricades. Also, the floors and roofs

through the barricade portals are to be replaced. Deteriorated escape chutes

and support framing are to be replaced and the surface drainage is to be

diverted away from the barricade foundation. Upgrade the electrical lighting

and wiring to meet the latest codes. Note: Rather than upgrade the 1940's

open wiring and nonconforming electrical at all the facilities at RAAP at.,-ont, time, it has previously been decided to correct the conditions whenmajor work is performed on individual buildings. New wiring and conduit on

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD I DEC7e 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

.4

- 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 19 88MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA I j ,ARMY -


Radford Army Ammunition PtVirginia

4. PROJECT T17lil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

Replacement TEMP

Replace Barricades at Explosive Operating Buildings 2700-02

PROJECT : (CONT)..

barricades corrects the majority of the requirements.

REQUIREMENT :

This project is part of an annual replacement program for the barricades at

this plant which were erected in the 1940-' l period. Thirty-three barricades

in Phase I (FY-80) through Phase V (FY-84) have been completed. Repairs to

many of these barricades have become excessive and cannot keep up with the

rate of deterioration, and the structural integrity cannot be assured.

CURRENT SITUATION

240 barricades are required at this plant to meet current production

schedules and for mobilization. A portion of these can be maintained for the

next 20 year-. The reraining ones should be replaced because of decaying of

the major structural components. A replacem-nt program has been started to

. renew the barri sdes at these buildings, a few each year, beginning with the

ones that are in greatest need of replacement.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDWithout adequate barricades, RAAP could not continue to operate within

*existing intraline quantity distances.

G. J. SavitskeLTC, OrdC

Commander

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: JANUARY 1988 INDEX: 1567

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JULY 1988 INDEX: 1590

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: JANUARY 1989 INDEX: 1616

DD FORM 31cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI

. . .DD I DEC 76 1UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 4

. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . %

a-. ~..~~''*~' -h2

'I. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 198 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA . "987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRadford Army Ammunition PtVirginia

4. PROJECT TIftb i l ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERReplacement TEMPReplace Barricades at Explosive Operating Buildings 2700-02

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

* - A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 0


OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY• 0


THE DESIRED FACILITY ................................................ 0($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN- THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A

REPLACEMENT ............................................. 0

($000)


1. STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED............................ ... OCT 86


c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ....................... .... \R 37



a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS .......................

c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT....................................

e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. JAN 38

DD RM1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD"I DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 55

'------------------------------------------------ "----.-'-"-'---"--.--"-'---'-----"

i 1. COMPONENT 2.DATE

.CM FY 19 8S MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTOATA JAN 1981~ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mobil Group 2

Twin Cities Army Ammo Pt Modernization

Minnesota Igloo Storage

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT CO0T O1TEMP

421 80 2800-8 2,600

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M OUANTITY C03 sOT


42180 EA 4 411000 1,644)


Electric Service LS .... 20)

Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS .. .. 120)

4 ' Site Imp( 474)Demo( ) LS .. .. 474)

42180 LS ....- 30)

SUBTOTAL 2,288




TOTAL REQUEST 2,604



10. Owcreption of Propoud Contnruction

DESCRIPTION Construct 4 concrete earth-covered, steam-heated, permaqent

igloos (3100 sf each) for propellant powder storage. Each igloo is to have a

mechanical dock leveler, all utilities, road and rail access, and full

security and safety systems. Existing salvage area is to be relocated as

necessary, and existing wood frame magazines are to be demolished.

11. REQUIREMENT: 12,400 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 12,400 SF

PROJECT :

Construct four propellant powder storage igloos, and demolish existing

substandard wood frame structures.

REQUIREMENT

This project is required to provide powder storage facilities that will meet

the criteria of Army security and safety regulations.

.

FORM PIVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY.. DO I DEc 7a 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. )b'U1

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 198 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONTwin Cities Army Ammo PtMinnesota4. PROJECT TI~Dil ization Group 2 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernizat ion TEMP

,Igloo Storage 2800-8

CURRENT SITUATIONPresent facilities are substandard, temporary wood structures that do notmeet safety/security standards, and have been used under waivers which willno lorger be granted.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDIf this project is not approved, use of the existing facilities will bepossible only if waivers are granted -- since the structures are not incompliance with AR 190-11 and DARCOMR 190-3.

ADDITIONALThe project described in this 1391 is part of a total project for sixstorage igloos. This portion of the work -- for four igloos -- is intended

-. to be constructed in FY88. The remaining two igloos and associated support.p facilities are proposed to be done in FY89. Estimated costs for the FY89

work are: 2igloos = $822000, support facilities = 64000, and contingency andSIOH = 95000 -- for a fy89 total of $981000.

/S/ Theodore E. SchulteTheodore E. Schulte

Commanders Representative


DDFORM 1 391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 57.4

:-~~~~~.:.................... .................. .......... .... ...... ,.-.... ..... . ,


ARMY FY 19 8 8 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ;;. 1987ARMY 19

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONTwin Cities Army Ammo PtMinnesota

4. PROJECT TIftbil ization Group 2 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMP

Igloo Storage 2800-8

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ......... 0

(PEOPLE)C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINFAIN




REPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)


1 . STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED ......................... NOV 86

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 60c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... FEB 87

2. BASISa. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES X NOb. WHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:

NA


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ..................................... 70c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 70d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 70


,..

4.

DD FORM _ PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 58

-r ..m 6.

1. COIMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA J41S87

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

Lone Star Army Ammunition Pt ModernizationTexas Chem Lab Rehabilitation

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST IS=OTEMP

226 90 2700-0350

9. COST ESTIMATES ______

ITEM U/M GUANTITY COST I$000)

PRIMARY FACILITY 473Chem Lab Rehab il itat ion L- -- ( 473)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 473CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.007') 47TOTAL CONTRACT COST 520SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (5.50%)TOTAL REQUEST 549TOTAL REQUEST IROUNDED) 550INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP ( 10)


RehabiL*1itatt, this plant's production chom lab, to) includo replacement ofI ) six work tables includ Ing drain troughs , s inks; 2) ei'ght fume exhausthood stations; 2) window air conditioning system in the instrument room witha central environmental unit; 4) deteriorated conductive flooring. Alsoincludes moditication of the heating system, installatoofaaiexchanger in the storage room, and construction of a storage facilit forhazardous gas cylinders. Si1te plan/safety submission not required. Hazardanal ys is not requi red. Procurement of or in-house manu fact urp of anyequipment or itemi will meet current OSHA, Army, Federal, State, or Localregulat io n o r l aw, whic heve r i s more s tr Ingent. Heati1ng and a ir c ond itLIon Ingrequired.

11. REQUIREMENT: 6,049 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUB STD: 6,049 SF

FOAM PREVIOUS IOITIONS MAY Of 156 INTERNALLYDO 1 EC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 39

%.

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE.,c,,FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

Lone Star Army Ammunition PtTexas

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER-. Moderni za tion TEMP

Chem Lab Rehabilitation 2700-03

..

PROJECTRehabilitation of existing 1-13 Chemical Laboratory

REQUIREMENT :Required to perform analysis of various production chemical mixes for

explosives content and environmental tests.,'4

CURRENT SITUATION0?.. The existing Chem Lab was constructed in 1941/42. It is an unsafe

antiquated, and deteriorated facility where various chemicals and explosives

are landled daily. The facility in its present deteriorated condition is

totally inadequate to provide a clean and safe environment for laboratory

personnel.

IiMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDThere are no alternatives to this project if the existing Chem Lab is to be

rehabilitated into an efficient, safe operating facility. In actuality,

there are two alternates; one, continue to use the existing facility as is.

This is not practical due to the deteriorated obsolete and unsafe condition

of the existing facility. Two, build a new facility. This is impractical due

to the much larger expenditures that would be required. The rehabilitation

of the existing facility is the only practical alternative.

ADDITIONALThis project has been reviewed for historic impact and complies with theintent of PL 89-665 and Executive Order 11593. All appropriate measures willbe taken to ensure that the health of the worker is protected within all

existing state and federal laws and regulations. This project has been

it

DD FORM 1391c pqgVXU IDITOt MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 60-f lEC 76 UNETIL EXH4AUSTEDOAG

e4

. .-~ . . . : . . . - . - .. ,.: . -'. -, . ., . •- ."v - . " .,-.. . .- • "-" ." * "", < .

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEARYFY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1927,. ~ARMY i ' '

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLone Star Army Ammunition PtTexas

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER, Mod erni za tio n TEMP

Chem Lab Rehabilitation

PROJECTRehabilitation of existing 1-13 Chemical Laboratory

REQUIREMENT :Required to perform analysis of various production chemical mixes forexplosives content anJ environmental tests.

CURRENT SITUATIONThe existing Chem Lab was constructed in 1941/42. It is an unsafeantiquated, and deteriorated facility where various chemicals and explosivesare handled daily. The facility in its present deteriorated condition istotally inadequate to provide a clean and safe environment for laboratorypersonnel.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDThere are no alternatives to this project if the existing Chem Lab is to berehabilitated into an efficient, sa'fe operating facility. In actuality,there are two alternates; one, continue to use the existing facility as is.This is not practical due to the deteriorated obsolete and unsafe condition

. of the existing facility. Two, build a new facility. This is impractical dueto the much larger expenditures that would be required. The rehabilitationof the existing facility is the only practical alternative.

ADDITIONALThis project has been reviewed for historic impact and complies with the

% intent of PL 89-665 and Executive Order 11593. All appropriate measures willbe taken to ensure that the health of the worker is protected within all

.1 existing state and federal laws and regulations. This project has been

. FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITION! MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD I I91C UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 61

1DEC76

04

1 2

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 198MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA J 1N ,37

;', ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION


, 4. PROJECT TITLE S. PROJECT NUMBER

M Modernization TEMPChem Lab Rehabilitation 2700-03

'-

reviewed and it has been determined that an Environmental Impact Statementpursuant to PL 91-190 is not required.

%..

/S/ DOUGLAS R. BAKERDOUGLAS R. BAKER

LTC ORDCCOMMANDING

. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1988 INDEX: 1575

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: DECEMBER 1988 INDEX: 1612

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1989 INDEX: 1645

,.

DO FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYO I DEC 76 ..... UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE No. 62

,e.a ', W .r '.%. ' %. a'~-'-~*

1.MPONENT 2. DATEICOMONAT ON FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987

ARMY II3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION


4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUM3ERModernizat ion TEMP

Chem Lab Rehabilitation 2700-03

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA


(5o000B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY



($000)


REPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... OCT 85

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.- 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ....................... DEC 86




a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............


c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........

d. CONTRACT ....................................

e. IN HOUSE ....................................


FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO I DEC 39 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 6 3

** .. . . . . . .

.

AR'CMYNN FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. AT

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE MobvI CR01

Ravenna Army ~ ii~nPt *Modernization

Ohio Lntru Alarm Sys/Locks/-asps

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($00)

ALAR~ SYSEM CNSTRCTIO

<P9.R COACILTITAEE

SUNUNIT COS36

TOTAL CONT QUANTCT COST 2,460

ACPERMISYST<. INECT ON 5.LOS 1358

TOALR' REQUET ROUNDED)S I' 292)0

\MSTALED~ EQIPMENRT-OTER APERE 0)6

iPfR FC LT E

*S B O A 10',cst-,ofP236dCoinjto

Pr!',"Ey ide CEN (1nd'. intl2prvd24k n aps ancr.n v hA 9-

TOAL C0vn7'LC hund 2,14v6t-0x77)erh-oerd n bvgrud trg

nag z~ es torae mgaznes re ocaed i aras hrouh ot te fa i 1i35

L~~~~1 ec to iglPopos Cosreulc octtiiBokConoet ilpovd o etro

ligh 3in ounder h igloo ncluding all6 elethcvric svicd and e4run stoag

:ahbl' -ss to -ervice the, IDS equipment a-nd1 tho liFr . F)- fencing

;haill bo prov.id-d iroun,! the IDS area with necessary gats nd roa1d

I F 'I p -"E v'.. ADFEQUATE: i DX SIB ST 8 BX

F 0 A MPREVIOUS tDITIONG MAY SIE USED IN4TERNALLYDD DC7 31UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. h-4

1.COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987

ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRavenna Army Ammunition PtOh io

4. PROJECT TITLE Mob ilization GROUF 3 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMP

lntru Alarm Sys/Locks/Hasps 2800-3

PROJECT

T11is project includes the purchase and installation of approvedhigh-security locks and hasps in accordance with AR 190-11 on 776earth-covered and/or 'boveground storage magazines. On 38 selected sitos theearth-covered storage magazines will require IDS equipment, lights,..and

fencing to satisfy AA&E Category II storage requirements.

REQU IREMENT

fI'is project is required to comply with the security requirements of DOD.Minual 5100.76M which requires approved locks and hasps IAW AR 19)-t! for

all irms. ammunition, and explosive storage. The 38 selected sites mustScomply with the security requirements of DOD Manual 5100.71)", for the starag

of Category LI AA&E which requires IDS, lights, and securi' ,' f ncing.Thisproject will eliminate the need for two-hour frequency patrols of theCategory II storage area and will also improve the security of sonsitivo

" A& E.

CURRENT SITUATION

-Currently Category II AA&E are stored in underground magazines which -re

not in compliance with regulations requiring high security locks and hasps,intrusion detection equipment, lighting, and fencing. Other Category Ill andIV AA&E are stored in underground and/or aboveground magazines which are notin compliance with regulations requiring high security locks and hisps. Aneed to waive existing regulations will have to be granted if the proposedwork is not accomplished.


lid Failure to approve this project will mean this installation will not bein compliance with the previously stated regulations. A waiver or exceptionwill have to be granted. On Category II storage security patrols will have

DOAM 139P PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYOf 731 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 65

, . - --

. . ..° , - , 1. , . . . -

I.COMPONENT 2. A. fFY 198 SMILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,


Ravenna Army Ammunition PtOhio

4. PROJECT TITLE Mobilization GROUF 3 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMPlntru Alarm Sys/Locks/liasps 2800-3

to be maintained at two-hour intervals until project is complet,- andoperational or waiver is granted.

/S/ Robert J. Kasper

Robert J. K3sper

: .mr .n d ing Of t ior s :Ro p.

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL I QSPI INDEX: 1575ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCT(TBER 1 9S5 INDEX: 1605ESTIMATED CONSTRUCT7, N COMPLETION: A.PR.IL 1989 INDEX: 1623

p

.4.

DD FOR 1391PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDDC FOM19c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO (.)D

S. - . . - - - - - - -.i- - a - -

.dd......

...................................................

%°*.*% ..i~~a


FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA j j 1987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONvenna Army Ammunition Pt

Ohio4. PROJECT TITLE Mobilization GROUP 35.PJETNMR

Modernization TPOEC U1ERP

~ GRUP ~TEMPIntru Alarm Sys/Locks/Hasps 2800-3

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 154.4


OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ......... 4



D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN ($000)

THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

($000)

_ PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

I. STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... SEPT 36


PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... FEB 87

2. BASIS

1. STANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES NO

b. WlHERE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:




C. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........

d. CONTRACT ....................................

e. IN HOUSE ....................................


FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 61 EC7

1. COMPONENT it DATE

FY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA .. ,ARMY '

3. INSTALLATION ANO LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEVOLUNTEER ARMY AMMO PLANT ModernizationTennessee Security Fencing

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST (5000)" " TEM P

872 10 5882800 7409. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST I*OOO1


Procure! lnstall Sec Fencing LF 44,600 14.88 664)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 664CONTINGENCY PERCENT 5.O0 -, 33TOTAL CONTRACT COST 697

UPERVI..:VN. VD 5T:TAL RE UEST 735

TOTAL REQUEST (R0UNDED) 7-W

INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPR')P 0)

10 Oecription of Proposed Construction

This project will "onsist of reps.cing,' rehab iitating security fe'ncingfrom a designat-d point )n the wost side of the installation to gate IA - a

distance of approximat_2 v 12.9 miles. .Most of the existing fencing is

approximately 40 v.1,r 1 id. N .wor ;.:ins consisting of approximately 2.8miles which1 hay.: bee n rehabil itated may, where feasible, be rtainfd in thecurrent staLts. in add ition, tho fencing around the twn wIt.r pump stationswhich consist )f approximately 0.6 miles of fence will be replaced. The

2.' removed fo nc i g is to be del ivered to the salvage yard for disposal.

Trio new f.'nc ing in h.,rlwaro r, to be in compli.ance with the Iatesti o-I I - - -i )r 1 - w

revision of STD 64(. Jt shall ho of typ, FE-6, 7 foot fihri: withappropriate bariwire. Gmt,-s SA, ', anl 7 and four gatos at tbh, pUmp stationsaro to bo repl acol in kind with matching hardwarC in a.orlanc, witb STD

646.

D" FORM P04EVIOV IEOITIONS MAY ME USEO INTERNALLY PE h-DO. 00 , 7c 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

% %'.

1.C06MPONENT 2. DATE

ARYFY 19 88MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987. ,". ARMY--J , 7

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION_V VOLUNTEER ARMY AMMO PLANT

Terrain along the bottom of the fence shall he graded to provide asurface which is within 2 inches of the bottom of the fabric for the entire: ogth. This grad5ing shall-Ebe accompUsEd in such IS to optimizedrinage to prevent washing under and near thTEHPnce

Clor zones shalt -extend 12 feet on the outs582 8n 30 tot on the insideof the fence (available real estate permitting).

Material is to be in accordance with Fder3l Spotei:fici RR-F- f withinstallation as specified and in accordance with accepted industry bestpractice. Grounding is to be in accordance with STD 64F.

Temporary fencing sections are to be provided sequentially as incrementsof the existing fence are removed and the new erected.This is to be done insuch a way as to maintain the required security throughout the entireconstruction period.

.11 REQUIREMENT: 68,100 LF ADEQUATE: 23, 500 LF SUBSTD: 44,600 LFPROJECT

Replacement/rehabilitation of 44,600 LF of security (p, rimeter) fencing.

REQUIREMENT

-- '.0 Completion of this project is requirel to brin, rh -,curitv (perimeter)fence into compliance with security specifications re co renced in the DSAR

%,-.' letter of 8 Dec. 1982 regarding security u pgrad,.e proi cts

CURRENT SITUATION

Increasing maintenance problems are being experienced. The fence has manyweak sections where the fabric is in very poor condition and is beyond thepoint of economically feasible routine maintenance. It does not meet thecurrent minimum height requirement in several areas.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE O 9

Sd

1.C MPONEN 2. DATE4-F J PFY 1988 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY* 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION'S. VOLUNTEER ARMY AMMO PLANT

Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLES.POETNMR


It not providled, the installation will remain in non-compliance of theminimum height: requi rement in several areas. Sec tions of the fence haveJeto!rroraied to the extent that breaching would not be difficult. In-creasing maintenance 'costs and further deterioration of installationsecurity will become problems of significant magnitude.

IS ao'E r

S!James E. Fry,

Civil ianCommander's Representative

ESTIMAT _D J:ONSTRUCTION "TART: APR7L 1987 INDEX: 1523ESTIMArED MDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JULY 1987 INDEX: 1539EST1MATED CD',NSTRUCTION COMPLETION: OCTOBER 1987 INDEX: 1555

DDFR 31 REIU.'TOS A EUE NTRAL .7

I E 6UNI XASTDPG

1. CdMPONENT 2 DATEARMY FY 19_8_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY A

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONVOLUNTEER ARMY AMMO PLANTTennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE S. PROJECT NUMBER'

Modernization TEMPSecurity Fencing 5882800

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA







TRE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... .AUG 36

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1987.. 95c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED .................... 3.\': 8,



a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS...............



4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED)..............

FORM oPREVIOUS EOITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD IDCM 1391c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

. .- .. -... DEC 76. '." -- " - , "" " - . -.. " , " " - . " " - ' . " - .- -£ ' ,' - . " .. '' ''"' ""i . " •". . ' , - _ , ' ' , ° ' . ' , , + . . : . . •

- :? " a

+: "o -

1. COWONENT DOAT9

FY 19 88 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 'ARMY"'

3. INSTALLATION ANO LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

Lake City Army Amino Plant

Missouri Security Improvements

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY COOE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST SO00" TEMP

,"872 15 2800"-07 L.1,150

'w 9. COST ESTIMATES

SITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST 4900


Road,', Fencing & Turnstile Instal lation L . . 1,045)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL i.n45




TOTAL REQUEST 1,157



10 D9scrOption of Proposed Construction

Task I - To provide access road to Building 35 which will be outside the

r.stricted area. Provide a fenced corridor to restrict employee access to

r-stricted areas when going to and from Building 65. Provide and install

security turnstiles (13), badge readers and associated electronics to limit

access to restricted areas to authorized personnel.

Task 2 - Provide locks and hasps for Energetic Material Storage buildings

(31).

Task 3 - Provide IDS equipment for energetic Material Storage Control and

:ommunications link to guard headquarters.

Task 4- Provide and install Closed Circuit Television Systems (CCTV) to

monitor areas in several buildings. Where complete rounds are processed orstore(i and for monitoring the restricted area access on the corridor to

FORM PPIEVIOu EDITIONS MAY NE USED INTERNALLYDD , DEC 7 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAOE NO.

. . . .. . . .. . . .. .......... . . .


ARMY FY 1988MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987:' ''ARMY DT

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri


Security Improvements TEMP

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION (CONT)..

Building 65.

Task 5 - Provide security for certain ADP areas.

Task 6 - Provide remote duress alarms in high priority areas (CommandGroup, GOCO Operator Management Offices, and certain remote guardlocations).

11. REQUIREMENT: I EA ADEQUATE: EA SUBSTD: 0 EAPROJECT

This project consists of six (6) security improvement tasks as describedin paragraph 1OF.

REQUIREMENT

- This project is required to provide necessary security of restrictedareas by routing personnel around such areas or by improving personnel

4 monitoring through such areas. This project is required to eliminatesecurity waivers in areas where the corrective action brings the affectedarea of buildings into total compliance with security requirements. Thisproject is required to provide necessary security of energetic materials,completed rounds of ammunition in process or storage, ADP areas and commandgroup areas. Due to the nature of this requirement, there are no acceptable

alternatives to this project.

:.1 CURRENT SITUATION

Security measures in areas encompassed by this project are presentlyinadequate according to current security requirements. Responsiveness tounauthorized intrusions is limited with current security measures.


Current security measures will continue to be utilized with limitedeffectiveness and responsiveness. Security requirement waivers will continueto be necessary. Security according to current requirements can not be

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. /

. . .". ... .." .. .. , . - ' . . ,". .'. ". " ". "N. . . . . -A. .. - - ~

1.COMPONENT 2. DATE

1CMOETFY 1988.MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 21.87

': ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo Plant

Missouri


Security Improvements 2800-07

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED (CONT)..

obtained in areas in question.

ADDITIONAL

This project will result in some reductions in security personnel.

/S/ DENNIS E. O'3RIENDENNIS E. O'LRIEN

LTC, ODCommanding Officer

.-, ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1988 INDEX: 1575.4. ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1988 INDEX: 1605

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCT7ION COMPLETION: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623

C-a.

-o

a,.

a,

" 0 DD FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY 7

, 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

'&Z


- ARMY I FY 19 88MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 19873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

Lake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri


TEMP

Security Improvements 2800-07

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA






(000)



REPLACEMENT .......................................

($000)


1. STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED ........................ OCT 86


c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1987.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ....................... (T 8






c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT....................................

e. IN HOUSE ....................................


DD FORM 91 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY--DD I DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. / -)

FOM 39c RVIUSEDTIN MA --.UE INENAL



APPROPRIATION: Procuremen* of Ammunition, Army



Holston Army 5892055 Modernization 3.350 78PT, Tennessee Explosive

Loading Dock

Lake City Army 5892495 Demolition 2.150 82PT, Missouri Relocate &

Mod TNE Process

Lake City Army 5892498 Alteration 1.350 6PT, Missouri Covered Walkway

Pyro Storage

Indiana Army 5892547 Modernization 1.850 90PT, Indiana Lighting

Protection

Holston Army 0072000 Modernization 5.300 93PT, Tennessee MOD Line 10,

Comp A-5

Indiana Army 5895330-13 Addition Shiphse/ .300 97PT, Indiana Ros-Phase V

Indiana Army 5895330-51 EMCS .840 101PT, Indiana

Kansas Army 5895329-19 Construction .230 105PT, Kansas Commercial

Truck Do

Lake City Army 5895332-17 Replace Oil .290 l08Missouri Storage Tank

Milan Army 5895317-18 Maz Mat Stg .810 112PT, Tennessee Bldg-Area S

- Milan Army 5895317-20 Replace .270 11'PT, Tennessee Inflatable

Shelter

76


FY 1989 - PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT(Cont'd)




Radford Army 5895326-16 Replacement 1.300 118PT, Virginia Replace (5)

Barricades

Radford Army 5892519 Safety 14.200 121PT, Virginia Modernization

Upgrade PrimaryOverheadElectrica

Radford Army 5895326-15 Replacement .370 125PT, Virginia Replace

Bridge No. 930

Twin Cities 5895201-22 Addition Package .560 128PT, Minnesota Boilers

Lake City Army 892245 Addition .830 132PT, Missouri Pyrotechnic

Safety Enhance

Lone Star Army 5892245 Addition .410 136PT, Texas Alteration

ProductionControl Fac

. Longhorn Army 582245 Modernization .820 140

. PT, Texas Pyro SafetyEnhancement

" Kansas Army 532918 Enlarge .230 144

PT, Kansas Railroad Docks

Longhorn Army 2701-08 Alteration Red .390 146?T, Texas Exp to Energ

Mat' 1

Twin Cities Army 2800-8 Igloo Storage 3.000 151PT, Minnesota

Holston Army 2701-2 Alteration 2.400 154PT, Tennessee Electrical SF

Corrections

7 7


FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1,N '987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--12034 ModernizationTennessee Explosive Loading Dock

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT I. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMSER S. PROJECT COST (50003

TEMP226 16 2055 3.350

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOSIT 1$00011

PRIMARY FACILITV 2,593Loading dock Barricades LS .. .. 694)Loading Dock Facility LS .. .. 890)Rails, Walks, Roads LS .. .. 634)Utilities LS ..... 274)Battery Charging Station LS .. .. 101)

.SUPPORT FACILITIES 311Site Imp( 311)Demo( LS 311)

S UBTITAL 2,904CONTINGENCY PERCENT (00.o07) 290

T.TAI. CONTRACT C')ST 3. 194S!'PE %V.ISC',N. INSPECT V1D ( 5.50%) 1767, T TI REQUEST 3, 370

".TAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 3, 350LNSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 316)

10 Description of Proposed Construction

Construct new loading dock for shipment of explosives. Scope of workincludes: demolition of existing loading dock; construction of new loadinglock: construction of explosion protection barricados; installation ofi tilities; access roads railroad spur; and general site improvements as

r. qiired. Project includes battery charging stiti, n for loctric forklifts.

1 1 REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF-PR,'WECT:

,)nstruct a now ,xplosives loading do,:k with i ?.,,' K V , ,xplsivosSi n t . Pr )V d'I roaid, p.irkinz ar,.i, r ii r ., p , ir ris-.i:,3 ind 1,1 ern

pi 1 in,, qui pmnnt

DD 'oE 1'91 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY SE USED INTERNALLY 73UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

'" ""..".".".""""-.".".."..."-".".'--........."'" -'""-......--.-..'."...."..-.".... -..I

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1989_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA J 96N 7

ARMY


HOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--12034

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PAOJECT NUMBERModernization TEMP

Explosive Loading Dock 2055

REQUIREMENT

The new dock willI replace an indadequate, deteriorated fac ility.Construction of a new loading dock is essential to provide the capability tosimultaneously outload a larger variety of products and to permitpalletization of finished explosives resulting in a more efficient operation

'- and the ability to meet FYDP and mobilization requirements.

CURRENT SITUATION

Currently two of the loading docks at Holston are seriously deteriorated.

The timber floors in these docks will not support forklifts nor handlepalletized loads due to the small size of the buildings.


Improvement of the industrial readiness posture for loading finishedexplosvies will not be realized if this project is not funded. The

*. capability to handle a larger variety of products and to palletize thefinished explosvies will not be achieved.

ADDITIONA I.

An environmental assessment will be prepared. It is expected that therewill be no significant impact to the environment.

A site'Safety Plan has been submitted and approved.

'2



I FY 19 8 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,ARMY I

*- 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--12034

Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMPExplosive Loading Dock 2055

This project is necessary to meet FYDP and mobilization requirements.Reference SRP-7.

'B

/S/ JAMES F. BALD, JR", jAMES F. BALD, JR

LTC, OD

Command ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: JUNE 1990 INDEX: 1674ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JULY 1991 INDEX: 1719ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 19Q' INDEX: 1766

,J.

'p,

LDD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY HE USED INTERNALLYD DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 80q EC7

6r


I FY 1989_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA~ARMY


Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMPExplosive Loading Dock 2055

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA




C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY .................................... 6846

(sooo)


- REPLACEMENT ....................................... NA.$000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .......................... MAR 87b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 60c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100J. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... MAY 88


3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS .................................... 192c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ..... ... 192d. CONTRACT .................................... 192e. IN HOUSE ....................................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. MAR 89

= " ]9 1c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 81

0

I. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mobil Group 1Lake City Army Ammo Plant Demolition

Missouri Relocate & Mod TNR Process

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST (SO=ITEMP

2 16 T8249 2.1509. COST ESTIMATES

UN T COSTITEM U/M QUANTITY UI CO

COST 411100)

PRIMARY FACILITY 974TNR Manufacturing Bldg. LS .. .. ( 450)Explosive Neutralizing Bldg. LS .. .. 250)Liquid Chemical Station & Stu rag LS ( 159)Enclosed Cartways LS .. .. ( 115)


Electric ;ervice LS -- -- ( 450)

Water, Sewer & Gas LS .... C 15)

Paving. Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS .... C 91)

Sto ranae LS . . ( 3)itP Lrw -; )Le:-.c( ) LS .. ( 21)

Cor ,un -i a LoiJ LS .. 2)

Lt h, r LS .. ( 390)

' SUBTOTAL 1,946

CONTINGENCY PERCENT 5.00%) 97

TOTAL CONTRACT CC2 2,043

". SUPEKV TON, 'INS -""T L OVIHD 5. 50.) 112

TO:%L REQUEST 2, 155

TOTAL REQUEST 1 ROUNDED) 2,150

INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 2,591)

10. D.croption of Proposed Construction

The primary facilities consist of two new fire-resistant, non-combustible

buildings of permanent construction. The first facility will be an explosive

manufacturing building (2,700 square feet) and the second facility a

hazardous waste treatment building (1,350 square feet). The explosive

manufactured in the building will be Trinitroresorcinol (TNR) a styphnic

acid. The TNR produced is used to manufacture Lead Styphnate, a major

component in the primer mixture used at the installation. The hazardous

waste treatment building will neutralize the wash water waste and then

neutralize the waste explosives. Demolition consists of the existing

Buildings 82, 83, 94D, T-226 and T-85A. Building 82 is presently utilized

for acid and explosive neutralization. Building 83 is presently used for TNR

manufacturing. Building 94D, T-226 and T-85A are support facilities for

chemical storage, metal powder storage and general supply storage

respectively. The existing grounds will be returned to its natural terrain.

II. REQUIREMENT: 4,050 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 3,800 SF

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY 82DO , OEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.


AM FY 198 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987... ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri

i4. PROJECTTit%*il ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER''-"Demo I i t ion TEMP

i -. " * Relocate & Mlod TNR Process T892495

PROJECTThis project will increase employee safety, decrease environmental impact,eliminate the use for an unsound structure, and improve the control of

process variables in the manufacturing of Trinitroresorcinol (TNR).

REQUIREMENT :

Employee safety will be improved by use of automatic feed equipment, aventilation system and a remote automatic control room. The automatic feedequipment will reduce the operators' exposure to the 98% Sulfuric Acid and96% Nitric Acid which are used in the production process. The improvedventilation system will reduce operators' exposure to nitrous oxides andother hazardous fumes. The remote control room will reduce the chance that

" an operator could be exposed to acid or exposure to an explosion of thereactor kettles due to a runaway reaction. The environmental impact will bedecreased by changing the process and using wet scrubbers on the improved

*- . ventilation system. The enhanced process reduces fumes and the scrubber willremove the nitrous oxides and other hazardous fumes to the atmosphere. Theexplosive neutralization facility will better desensitize the explosive

*. . waste. The new acid resistant building will be constructed and newproduction equipment will be furnished for this facility tc replace the

x-- iexisting facilities, which the Army Corps of Engineers reported as unsound.The operator will be permitted to remotely monitor all process variablesaccurately that effect the product in the isolated control room.

CURRENT SITUATIONThe TNR is currently manufactured using the same buildings, process andprocess equipment used in 1942 when the facilities were installed. Continuedexposure of the facilities to nitric acid, sulfuric acid and the fumesevolved from these acids has caused the structural members and concrete

*foundations to deteriorate to such a degree that renovation is uneconomical..r Waste from the process is largely sulfuric and nitric acids. The new process

is. dramatically reduces this acidic condition. The present explosive waste islabor intensive and minimal process control. The waste is then pumped to anevaporation lagoon. The fumes from the process are currently dischargeddirectly to the atmosphere. Employees are now exposed to toxic fumes on the

average of twice per operating shift. Employees are now manually loading thetoxic and acidic chemicals to the reaction kettle in producing the TNR. Thisexposes them to the hazards of fumes, spills or detonation. Presently allprocesses require raanual operation for loading, washing, packing andneutralization.

D FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 83

.4

4.


FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JA;, ,c" 'ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri4. PROJECTTIfthilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERDemolition TEMPRelocate & Mod TNR Process T892495

* IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDIf this project is not approved, it will result in the continued use of

deteriorating facilities and manual procedures that endanger life andproperty. LCAAP is the only Government installation capable of processingTNR.

ADDITIONALThis project is programmed in Modernization as Project No. 5892495. JPO:kah

23806

Dennis E. O'Brien

Lieutenant Colonel

Commanding Officer

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1989 INDEX: 1650


DO FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

-1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 34

:N.,

[ - i - i :, .,-r r. nflr wrr rr lfr ., ' r :'t-r W m n ,% ,- . .- ,.,-o . . - , .. .... . .. . . .

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 198 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA , 1987

ARMY 7

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo Plant

* Missouri

4. PROJECTTIi" iza tI on Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERDemolition

TEMP

Relocate & Mod TNR Process T892495

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA




C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY .................................... 2,295,000

' - ($000)D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A* REPLACEMENT ......................................... 2,470,000'"" ($000)


I . STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ............................. . .\Y 6b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. tood. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ....................... DEC 87


'p...


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS .............

F- b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e)........


4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) ............... \P: "9

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 85.4

1. COMIPONIENT DATE

ARMY FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA,, ARMY I ..

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mob 1 Group I

Lake City Army Ammo Plant Alteratin

Missouri Covered Walkway Pyro Storage

-. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST 4*0001

TEMP

226 22 T892498 1,350

9. COST ESTIMATES


COST (SO"


Mix & Storage Area - Covers LS .. .. ( 539)

Relocate Bldg. 38D & 33E LS .. .. 275)


Electric Service LS .... ( 160)

Water, Sewer & Gas LS .... 3)

Steam, Chilled Water & Heat Dist LS .... i( 50)

Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters L ....S 65)

Storm Drainag: L ....S 65)

Site Imp( 25)De,( LS 2 5)

Communicat ion L- ... ' 2)

_r hpr LS ... . 20)

SUBTOTAL 1,204

CONTINGENCY PERCENT ' 5.00%) 60


SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVIiD ( .50%) 70

TOTAL REQUEST 1,334

. TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 1,350


10 Doscrotion of Proposed Construction

This project totally encloses walkways in the pyrotechnic manufacturing

" areas where tracer, igniter and incendiary compositions are blended, dryed

and stored for small caliber ammunition. Also, two buildings (38D & 38E)

will require relocation, barricading and walkways. Demolition of the

.xisting two buildings (38D & 38E) relocated can then be accomplished.

1V. REQUIREMENT: ADEQUATE: SUBSTD: 0

PROJECT

To enhance personnel safety in the pryotechnic manufacturing area by totally

enclosing the walkways at the manufacturing area.

REQUIREMENT r

Exposure to operating personnel transporting pyrotechnic materials will besubstantially reduced by the placement of a totally enclosed walkway that

interconnects the manufacturing and storage buildings. This project will

improve the walkways physical condition, thereby giving operating personnel a

P0MFORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO , D "E~cm7. 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 86

[ V.


FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA - ,ARMY

" 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION, Lake City Army Ammo Plant

Missouri

4. PROJECTTIW- I" ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAl terat ion TEMPCovered Walkway Pyro Storage T892498


* consistent surface to walk and transport over. The elimination of these. harsh conditions will remove the need for Grounds Support services to clean

and maintain the walkways during inclement weather. The halting of 1-136igniter cake production during rain, due to fire hazard of water reactingwith strontium peroxide.No other facilities at Lake City AAP are capable of manufacturingpyrotechnic materials. Consideration was given to a major consolidation ofthe storage and manufacturing facilities for pyrotechnic production. Thisproposal was determined not to be cost effective, when compared to thiswalkway project.

CURRENT SITUATIONOperating personnel presently are exposed to inclement weather while pushingor carrying explosive pyrotechnic mixtures. Production processes will bedelayed due to potential fire hazard and the need for snow and ice removal.

* Ground Support services are required to clean and maintain the walkways fromweather maintenance. Wind blown rain or snow increases the exposure

potential of the pyrotechnic materials. Continued exposure to wind chillsbelow freezing is hazardous to the operating personnel transporting theexplosive pyrotechnic materials.

IMPACT !F NOT PROVIDEDIf this project is not approved, it will result in the continued potentialfire hazard with the igniter cake from rain exposure. Production delays willcontinue from the need to remove and clean walkways of snow and ice betweenthe facilities. Operating personnel will continue to be exposed to hazardsfrom the pyrotechnic materials reaction to weather and the inclement weatheritself.

ADDITIONALThe construction of walkway enclosures will resolve the problems associatedwith personnel and material exposure during different types of inclementweather. The elimination of these harsh conditions will remove the need forGround Support services to clean and maintain the walkways during and afterinclement weather. This enables a smooth and unobstructed flow of materialsin the pyrotechnic manufacturing and ammunition production areas.


% :


ARMY (FY 198-91MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA -

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri4. PROJECT TltIQilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAl terat ion TEMPCovered Walkway Pyro Storage T892498

This project is programmed in Modernization as Project No. 5892498. JPO:kah23820

Dennis E. O'BrienLieutenant Colonel

Commanding Officer


DDFR 31 RVOSEIIOSMYB SDITRAL

I E 6UNI XAUTDPGEN.8

W . . . .


A FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA jpji IS37ARMYI

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri4. PROJECTTltkilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAlteration TEMPCovered Walkway Pyro Storage T892498

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY......... 0


THE DESIRED FACILITY .............................. 1,245,000($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT....................................... 1,405,000

($000)

* E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .......................... .'AY 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ..................... DEC 87



a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e).........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................

-4

I"- 4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. AR8

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYS 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 89

.4

S,

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ".ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4 PROJECT TITLEINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT Modernization

Indiana Lightning Protection

"5 S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6l. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ISO00)S. PTEMP

422 80 5892547 1,850

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST I(000)

PRIMARY FACILITY

SUPPORT FACILITIES 1,576

Lightning Protection L .... ( 1,576)

I

SUBTOTAL 1,576




TOTAL REQUEST 1,829



10 Description of Proposd Construction

Install new and upgrade existing lightning protection systems for compliance

with AMCR 385-100. Work to include installation of lightning arrestors and

associated cabling; installation of new and/or the upgrade of existing

ground grid systems; and installation of system testing points for trailer

loading and unloading areas at 7 trailer pads, 26 service magazines, 6

crating sheds, 10 igniter rest houses, 48 shiphouses, 173 igloos, 13 rail

spurs, and 4 loading docks.

11. REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: SF

PROJECT

To provide updated lightning protection for mobile material handling

Pquirm.,nt in accordance with AMCR 385-100.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO , DEC 7e 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 1)0

7.. ........ -............ . . ... -, .- .


FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA j*" 13S7ARMY 1

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Indiana

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernization TEMP

Liehtning Protection 5892547J

REQUIREMENTThis project is required to correct lightning protection deficiencies.

CURRENT SITUATIONCurrently, lightning protection is not adequate to provide protection tomobile material handling equipment being used during loading or unloading ofammunition items/components.

-, IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :*. If this project is not provided, mobile material handling equipment will not

have lightning protection, with consequent risk to both personnel andequipment.

ADDITIONALAn economic analysis is not necessary for the project. All potentialalternatives were examined in the development of the project and none werefound to be feasible.

4.

/S/ TRANNIE W. SANDERSON, /STRANNIE W. SANDERSON

LTC, CMCommand ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: JANUkRY 1989 INDEX: 1616ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: FEBRUARY 1990 INDEX: 1662ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: MARCH 1991 INDEX: 1706

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 9i

I,.!.; Al. J& l- R....,. . -


FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY


} Ind iana

,'4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

Modernizat ion TEMP

Lightning Protection 5892547

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA





($000)


REPLACEMENT .......................................................... 0

($000)


1. STATUS

a. DATE DESIGN STARTED .....................

b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ...................... NOV 87



a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS .......................... 167c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 167

d. CONTRACT .................................... 115e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 52

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) JUN 89

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 921 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED.4J

:": :,- -:,-::::::::::::::::::::: :

i. COMPONENT r. nrARMYN FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.Oi

S,'. ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--i1212 Modernization

Tennessee MOD Line 10, Comp A-5

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST MO

-. 78011A 226 90 10072000 5,300

: ,%'9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT CWT

PRIMARY FACILITY 4,453,. New Construction L S ... ( 1,640)

Alteration. Conversion LS .. .. ( 2,813)

- SUPPORT FACILITIES 299

Paving. Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS -- ( 53)

Utilities, Paving. Site Work LS -- ( 246)

'5..

SUBTOTAL 4,752

CONTINGENCY PERCENT K 5.002) 238


SUPERVISION, :NSPECT & OVHD ( 5.50%) 274

TOTAL REQUEST 5,264

TOTAL REQUEST . ROUNDED) 5,300

INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP ( 21,247)

10. Dt cription of Proposed Construction

New construction, alteration, conversion, utilities services, paving and

site work as requirod to modernize A-Composition production facilities on

Line 10. Demol i3h five (5) substandard buildings (14,480 SF).

11. REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT

Modernize A-Composition production facilities on Line [0.

REQUIREMENT

This project is required to establish sufficient production capability to

meet mobilization end-product outpost levels for A-Composition explosives

and to enhanc production worker safety.

oM ,,PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYODD 1 DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 93

"-"d- '""' -'' .'" -g ' - '' " - - "" "" .1 7. . . ' - " -: "" "' '''" " . . , " " .-, .

4MR..C


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA *Z.. i987

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11212Tennessee


Modernization

MOO Line 10, Comp A-5 0072000

CURRENT SITUATION

Line 10 is now contigured tor batch type production of B-Conpositionexplosive and is presently in layaway. Modernization of Line 10 forA-Compositions manufacture is necessary to meet established modernization

production rates. Holston is the sole producer of RDX explosives in the

United States. Compositions A-3, A-4 and A-5 are coated RDX products used in

press-loaded munitions.

- IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED

If this project is not provided, the mobilization production levels for

A-Composition explosives cannot be -get and th. xisting batch processproduction facilicies will continue to posr hiAier tuan -,ecessarv risks 1oproduction oo:ker safety.

/S/ JAMES F. BALD, JRJAMES F. BALD, JR

LTC, ODCommand ing


ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JUNE 1990 INDEX: 1674

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1991 INDEX: 1725

DD 1FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

'I

'= 1DC 6UNI EXHAUSTED*

D-A184 29 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR 2/2

FISCAL YEARS 1988/1 (U) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF FORRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITIO JAN 87

UNCLASSIFIED F/G 15/5 NL

EIIIIIIEEIIIIEElllEElllIEIIElllhlhhlllllEElEEEEllEEEIhE

2.52Iiiii , , _ . 2

1111 1111 1.8-. lUIIL 25l 4l n .6

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-I963-A

-w ""IA

pp

-i,

U "- ,U Wl U ... .,S S -. WU . V V .. "- .. V - : . Wf. .! " .,

I 1 - '#, :,'''"J-'' ',-. ."

"".". "'-") " .- -. *" ",'.


FY 19 8 9MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PT--11212Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernizationMOD Line 10, Comp A-5 0072000

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY UNK($000)

B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRYOUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ......... UNK


THE DESIRED FACILITY .............................. ............ UNK($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT .................. ....................

($000)

E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE-)

I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... AUG 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... AUG 87


N/A

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS .............. 165b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS .......................... 261c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 426d. CONTRACT ................................................... 205e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 221

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. FEB 89



FY 198 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA jgIC 17ARMY


Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERModernizationMOD Line 10, Comp A-5 0072000





Amno Production Eq PAA 87 19700

DD FORM i1: c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO.DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED 96

1l

1. COMPOENT 2. oAT

ARMY FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA r3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE obil roup

INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT AdditionIndiana Shiphse/Rds-Phase V

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST 000TEMP

421 81 5330/13 3009. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT GO6'IT

PRIMARY FACILITY 256Shiphse/Rds-Phase V SF 38,202 6.70( 256)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 256CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 26TOTAL CONTRACT COST 282SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD ( 5.50%) 16TOTAL REQUEST 298TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) I300INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP ( 17)

10. D sripton of Propoted Construction

Phase V will provide for the building of access roads, the purchase of oneportable ramp and the reinforcing of floors to sixteen (16) rail shiphouses.

11. REQUIREMENT: 155,283 SF ADEQUATE: 119,914 SF SUBSTD: 35,369 SFPROJECT :

A To convert sixteen (16) limited access Rail Shiphouses to prime explosivestorage locations.

REQUIREMENTAccess roads are needed for trailer truck access to existing shiphouses that

have only rail access, for end-product storage requirements.

CURRENT SITUATIONCurrently, the shiphouses are loaded in two stages. First, by manualtransfer of propellant from an intraplant trailer to a rail jitney car andthen by manual transfer from the jitney car into the shiphouse. Direct

FORM PREVIOUS KOITIONS MAY 9E USED INTERNALLYDD oec 7e 1391 UNTILPA NO. 97

UN, -. U


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA f.; 1 873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Indiana4. PROJECT Tiilization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAddition TEMP

ShiDhse/Rds-Phase V 5330/13

CURRENT SITUATION (CONT)..

trailer access eliminates one transfer operation. Floor reinforcement is

required for forklift transfer of goods.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :Failure to provide this project will necessitate the continued costly

manipulating and rewarehousing of explosive inventories. Additional hiring

of material handling personnel will be required to keep up with the rate of

Class 1.3 storage turnover and more people than necessary will be exposed to

hazards of manually handling explosives. Critically needed prime explosive

storage space to comply with the ballistic acceptance procedures in SB

742-1, ammunition surveillance prccedures for finished goods produced will

be lacking at INAAP if this project is not provided.

ADDITIONALPresently, INAAP has 238 Class 1.3 facilities. Increased production

schedules for 1986-88 will require that all 238 Class 1.3 facilities be

utilized equally and that an estimated 1,217 load or unload operations will

be required annually. It is estimated that an annual savings of $415,301

will be realized. Additionally, approximately 150 hours will be saved for

quality assurance, content surveillance, inventory check and maintenance

personnel.

/S/ TRANNIE W. SANDERSONTRANNIE W. SANDERSONLTC, CMCommand ing


ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBER 1989 INDEX: 1650


IR

D FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 98

*4


FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA AN 18 7ARMY 1,%


Ind iana

4. PROJECT Tlt Pl ization Group I 5. PROJECT NUMBERAddition TEMP

Shiphse/Rds-Phase V 5330/13

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 0($000)



C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY .............................. 0

($000)


THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT ........................................................ 0

($000)

- E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .....................b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... NOV 87


INAAP


a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ...................... 27c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 27d. CONTRACT .................................... 19

e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 8

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. JUN 89

of DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE No. 99S1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

.14

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONINDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PTIndiana4. PROJECT TItlil izaton Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERAdd it ion TEMPShiphse/Rds-Phase V 5330/13

F. EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BEPROVIDED FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS



Portable Ramps, one PA, A 42.11 89 17.0

DO F ORM 19cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD DEC 76 191cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 100

i. COMPONENT .DATFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY , 1


INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Indiana EMCS6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST 1000)

TEMP

800 00 5330/51 840

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM WI I -(jA1y D"o 0,.

PRIMARY FACILITY

Enrgy Monitor Contrl Syst LS .. .. ( 724)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUB TOTAL 724CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 72TOTAL CONTRACT COST 796SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD ( 5.50%) 44TOTAL REQUEST 840TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 840INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Decription of Propond Construction

This project consists of replacing the existing Energy Monitoring andControl System (EMCS) with one that will provide enhanced and expandedcapabilities. The EMCS (with 2,000 points) will control package boilers at24 locations, one furnace, chiller systems in 18 buildings, air handlingunits in 27 buildings, compressors in 9 locations, and area lighting systemsin 10 buildings. Steam consumption will be controlled with connections tomain steam supply valves supplying 9 buildings, to steam reducing valvessupplying 9 buildings, and with connections to valve pits in 6 additionalbuildings. The EMCS will also provide temperature setback capability in 15buildings and monitor electrical metering field equipment in 46 locations.EMCS field equipment will be installed in a compatible manner with theexisting equipment with wired connections to local Field Interface Devices(FIDs). FIDs will use either FM or telephone links to the Master ControlRoom (MCR). The MCR will contain the Central Processing Unit (CPU),peripherals, software, etc. Software provided will optimize the energyconsumption of controlled equipment. Employee training will be provided.

_' _FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD i oic 7s 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 101

I% 2,6

Indiana

11. REQUIREMENT: LS ADEQUATE: LS SUBSTD: 0 LS

PROJECT :This project will provide a plantwide EMCS for INAAP.

REQUIREMENT:Wide-ranging energy conservation measures will be implemented, decreasingenergy consumption. implementation will help meet energy goals, mandatedenergy reduction requirements, supporting AMCCJ Policy 11-4 (July 1985).

CURRENT SITUATION :This need is currently not being met due to the fact that no EMCS isavailable to provide the needed controls.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDFailure to approve this project will result in continued use of largequantities of energy, the annual equiv'Alent of 7,981 barrels of oil.

ADDITIONALThe reduced energy consumption amounts to an annual savings of 9,389 MWH/YRin electricity, 49,501 gal/yr of No. 2 fuel oil, and 2,893 MCF of naturalgas. An annual FY86 dollar savings of $55,613 in NO. 2 fuel oil, $177,945 innatural gas and $435 in labor is estimated. This amounts to an annual costavoidance of $298,786. Implementation will reduce energy consumption by46,487 MBTU/yr.

/5/ TRANNIE W. SANDERSONTRANNIE W. SANDERSONLTC, CMCommand ing

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: JANUARY 1989 INDEX: 1616ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JULY 1989 INDEX: 1636ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: JANUARY 1990 INDEX: 1660

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 102


FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JARMY_ JAN 1987ARMY II


Indiana


EMCS 5330/51

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 29.6



C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY ........................................... 269.9


THE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT ........................................ na

($000)


1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED .....................b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... Dec 87


3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ...................... 76c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 76d. CONTRACT .................................................... 534 e. IN HOUSE .................................................... 23

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. Jun 89

DD FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 103


ARMY I FY 198-9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987


Indiana4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

TEMPEMCS 5330/51

F. EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BEPROVIDED FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS



None

A°

FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 104

1. COMPON4ENT .DATE

ARMY FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION . PROJECT TITLEKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKansas Construction Commercial Truck Do

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST (S=)TEMP

851 90 532919 230S. COST ESTIMATES

---- UNIT C SITEM U/M QUANTITY COST *0)

PRIMARY FACILITY 210Construct Commercial Truck Docks LS 210)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 210CONTINGENCY PERCENT ( 5.00%) 11TOTAL CONTRACT COST 221SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD C5.50%) 12TOTAL REQUEST 233TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 230INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)


Construct commercial truck docks to support warehousing operations in the1400 Area to provide concrete dock and double truck wells between Buildings1412-13, 1414-15 and 1415-16 complete with proper drainage, dock bumper anddock levelers.

11. REQUIREMENT: Is ADEQUATE: Is SUBSTD: 0 IsPROJECTConstruct three (3) double well truck docks complete with proper drainage,dock bumper and dock levelers.

REQUIREMENTThis project would provide commercial truck docks for unloading materialswhich would reduce material handling and reduce costs.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY SE USED INTERNALLYDD I DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 105

Qd

, '< '~~~~~~~~~. .. ...-..., ,, ,..-.., . . ....... ,, ... ,..-.......-..........-...............,-... , ......- -... ,

I-COMPONENT 2 D_ FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 18

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

-,- Kansas4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

~TEMP

C~nstruction Commercial Truck Docks in 1 532919

j CURRENT SITUATION:

The warehouses in 1400 Area are ground level type structures which require

double handling of materials received by commercial truck.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDWarehousing operations would still require double handling of materialsreceived in-plant by commercial truck.

/ C

/S/ CHARLES T. WALLSCHLAEGER'-i "CHARLES T. WALLSCHLAEGER

LTC, OrdC

Command ing


I,..

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 106

*1%


FY 19t9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN; 1987ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

Kansas4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

TEMP

Cgenstruction Commercial Truck Docks in 1 532919

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA




C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESIRED FACILITY ........................................... 8500

($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT ....................................... 0

($000)

V' E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ............... ...... nov 86b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988. 100c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ......................... nov 87


na

3. COST (TOTAL - $000)a. PRODUCTION OF PLANS AND SPECS ..............b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ............................. 21,000

.,.' c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) ......... 21,000d. CONTRACT ..................................................... 0e. IN HOUSE ................................................. 21000


DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD 1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 107

.4

'9SS

I.COMPONENT DATE

ARMY FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 19373. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION PROJECT TITLE Mob i GROP 3

LAKE CITY ARMY AMMO PLANTMissouri Replace Oil Storage Tank

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT S. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST W00)TEMP

* 821 90 5332-17 290

IM9. COST ESTIMATESITEM U/M QUANTITY COT T

PRIMARY FACILITY 247Replacement of Fuel Oil Tank LS -- ( 247)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

9i

SUBTOTAL 247CONTINGENCY PERCENT (10.00%) 25

TOTAL CONTRACT COST 272SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (5.50%) 15TOTAL REQUEST 287TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 290INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Decription of Prooosed Construction

Disconnect all steam, oil and steam condensate pipe lines from the existingconcrete storage tank. Disconnect all light circuits and the electronic fueloil level measuring device from electrical service. Demolish the tank andfoundation, and remove all heating facilities from the rubble. Dispose ofall piping and concrete rubble in accordance with the latest requirementsfor disposal of materials coated with a potential hazardous waste. Provide anew foundation and construct an all steel 223,000 gallon storage tank on thecleared site complete with tank steam heating coils, steam suction heater,connected steam, transfer oil piping and lighting. Provide new electronicoil level measuring equipment. Test the existing soil and remove anyoil-contaminated soil. The new steel tank shall be equipped with cathodicprotection.

11. REQUIREMENT: 1,000,000 GL ADEQUATE: 500,000 GL SUBSTD: 250,000 GL

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD , oEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED FACE NO, JOS

7," , ,,. ', : '. ,''":, -.- '.'-' "-..../ ,-: : :.. ; >+ .'...-: : ... . .'.;,. ----,.-'


ARMY I FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 19973. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLAKE CITY ARMY AMMO PLANTMissouri

4. PROJECT TIM" ization L;Kuu" 3 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMP

Replace Oil Storage Tank 5332-17

PROJECTConstruct a new all steel fuel oil storage tank, approximately 223,000gallons capacity with a steam heating devices, piping, and oil levelmeasuring equipment that complies with AMC-R 385-100, NFPA codes, State andFederal requirements.

REQUIREMENT :A new steel tank of approximately 223,000 gallons capacity is required tomaintain a 30 day storage capacity for fuel oil as required to comply withAR 420-49. One (1) reinforced concrete itora .tnktNsf Zdisposed of as result of this project. ccom5 s me tsWuphjectwill eliminate a potential source of environmental pollution of soil andwater.

CURRENT SITUATIONThe existing storage tank was constructed in 1942 of reinforced concrete,formed in place. The concrete has become saturated with oil over the years,and oil is seeping to the outside and down the sides of the tank creating apotential pollution and fire hazard. The leaks cannot be repaired andreplacement is required. The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)Law 10 CSR 24-4.0-20, Waste Oil, states that waste oil is a hazardous waste.A hazardous waste with a potential to pollute groundwater cannot, in theState of Missouri, be allowed to leak or spill onto the ground. TheEnvironmental Protection Agency Hazardous Waste and Consolidated PermitRegulation (Federal Register), Subpart C--Preparedness and Prevention,264.31 Design and Operation of Facility, states facilities must be designed,constructed, maintained, operated to minimize the possibility of a fire,explosion, or any unplanned sudden or non-sudden release of hazardous wasteor hazardous waste constituents to air, soil, or surface water which couldthreaten human health or the environment.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDIn the event this project is not approved, the production schedules assignedfor mobilization could be affected adversely and the Plant will remain notin compliance with AR 420-49.Beneficial Occupancy Date: M+5

ADDITIONAL :Cost is shown in FY89 dollars. The Corps of Engineers CWE cost withescalation was used. This subproject has a completed design as PSR Project5845332, Subproject 24. This subproject is currently programmed as PSRProject 5895332, Subproject 17.

DD FORMDEc76 13 91c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYIC UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 109

J1

I. COVIO ENT !2. DATEFY 1 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JN18

ARMY JN18

I. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLAKE CITY ARMY AMMtO PLANTMissouri

4. PROJECT TI!l.il ization GROUP 3 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMP


ADDITIONAL (CONT)..

KLC :kah

6294

/S/ DENNIS E. O'BRIENDENNIS E. O'BRIENLTC, ODCommanding Officer

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: ' OCTOBER 1989 INDEX: 1650


DD FORM 1 391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 110

'1J


FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY J 19 73. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

LAKE CITY ARMY AMMO PLANTMissouri

4. PROJECT TIViflization GROUP 3 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMP


SUPPLEMENTAL DATA





THE DESIRED FACILITY ..............................I. ($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS AREPLACEMENT ......................................

($000)


I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ....................... . ... AY 86


c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100





c. TOTAL COST (c) - (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........


4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) .............. APP 89

p-.

DD OR 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 111

1. COMPONENT DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 1987ARMYJN17

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION . PROJECT TITLEMilan Army Ammunition PlantTennessee HAZ. MAT. STG. BLDG.-AREA S

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT S. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST 41000)TEMP

411 90 5317-18 8109. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UIM QUANTITY UNIT CSTCOST 16000)

PRIMARY FACILITY 734HAZ. MAT. STG. BLDG. AREA S LS 734)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL 734CONTINGENCY PERCENT ( 5.00%) 37TOTAL CONTRACT COST 771SUPERVISION, INSPECT & OVHD (5.50%) 42TOTAL REQUEST 813TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 810INSTALLED EQUIPMENT-OTHER APPROP 0)

10. Descriptlon of Propo ed Construction

PROVIDE A SPECIALLY DESIGNED BUILDING THAT WILL MEET ALL STATE AND FEDERALREQUIREMENTS FOR THE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS. THE PROPOSEDSTRUCTURE WILL BE SINGLE STORY, WITH FINISH FLOOR SET AT TRAILER HEIGHT.EXISTING AREA ROADS CAN BE UTILIZED FOR ACCESS, BUT TRUCK APRONS AT EACHCARGO DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED. ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR LIGHTING AND HEATSUFFICIENT TO PREVENT FREEZING WILL BE REQUIRED. NO OLD FACILITIES WILL BEDISPOSED OF. NOT SITED IN A FLOOD PLAIN.

11. REQUIREMENT: SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 13,055 SFPROJECT :THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A BUILDING THAT WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OFEXISTING ARMY REGULATIONS AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVES FOR THEII STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO EC ? 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGENO. 112

W*- Iwoj


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA JAN 19873. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMilan Army Ammunition Plant

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

TEMP

HAZ. MAT. STG. BLDG.-AREA S 5317-18

REQUIREMENT :NO APPROVED FACILITY EXISTS FOR THE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC

MATERIALS. NO PROVISIONS FOR SPILL CONTAINMENT IS PROVIDED AND COMPATABILITY

GROUPINGS ARE NOT SEPERATED IN THE PERSCRIBED MANNER.

CURRENT SITUATIONCURRENTLY ONE (1) WAREHOUSE AND AN EARTH COVERED MAGAZINE ARE USED TO STOREALL HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS USED AT THIS INSTALLATION. THE WAREHOUSE

IS UNHEATED AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AR 200-1 FOR THE STORAGE

OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS. LIKEWISE THE EARTH COVERED MAGAZINE DOESNOT MEET THE STATED REQUIREMENTS AND IS BEING USED FOR STORAGE OF ITEMS

OTHER THAN THOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS DESIGNED NAMELY EXPLOSIVES AND EXPLOSIVECOMPONENTS.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDTHIS INSTALLATION WILL CONTINUE TO BE IN VIOLATION OF AR 200-1 AND OTHER DODDIRECTIVES CONCERNING STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS.

/S/ KENNARD G. KARRKENNARD G. KARR

LTC ORDCCOMMANDING



1.COMPONENT 2. DATE

ARMY I FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 073. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMilan Army Ammunition Plant

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE S . PROJECT NUMBER

HAZ. MAT. STG. BLDG.-AREA S T3E7-P

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA



OUT THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY ........._- (PEOPLE)





($000)


I. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ..................... DEC 86


c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988.. 100d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ................... Dpr 87



c. TOTAL COST (c) - (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................


D FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. 114DD I EC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PG O 1

1. COMPONENT . DATEAM FY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1987ARMY j!;18


Milan Army Ammunition PlantTennessee REPLACE INFLATABLE SHELTER

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST 1$000)TEMP

ztZl 0 5317-20 270

9. COST ESTIMATES


CO T ($000O)

- PRIMARY FACILITY 239

REPLACE INFLATABLE SHELTER LS 239)

SUPPORT FACILITIES

.

SUBTOTAL 239




TOTAL REQUEST 265



10. Decription of Proposed Construction

WORK CONSISTS OF REMOVING AN EXISTING AIR SUPPORTED STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF

CANVAS, BLOWERS, BLOWER MOTORS AND ALL RELATED HARDWARE. STRUCTURE WILL BE

REPLACED WITH A NEW PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING. NOT SITED IN A

FLOODPLAIN.

11. REQUIREMENT: 30,350 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT :

'-I DRY STORAGE AREA FOR THE STORAGE OF WOODEN, METAL AND FIBER INERT AMMUNITION

CONTAINERS.

REQUIREMENT

.r. EXISTING AIR STRUCTURE WAS ERECTED IN 1977 AND WILL BE 11 YEARS OLD IN FY89.

THE EXPECTED LIFE OF THE FABRIC COVER WILL HAVE BEEN EXPENDED BY THEN.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD oc ?e 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAOE NO. 115

%°

L %:*',.-:...,_ _ ,

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMi I an Army IInrun I t i n P1 rtTennelosseel

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERTEMPl

REPLACE INFL-^,TA5\ L,--- EI!F 53l7-20

CURRENT SITUATIONCURRENTLY THE AIR S1*PPORTEI) STRUCTURE SERVES AS .\N ACCEPTABLE STORAGE AREAEVEN THOUGH ALL AVALABI-F I LUEK SI'ACE CANNOF BE IFILIZEI) SINCE IHE FABRICHAS DEVELOPED 2LEAKS . . . . T, I'I' tHE 1K)T ,- , I." E P- . ,EY()N) REPAIR

BY FY89.

IMPACT iF NOT Pkt UVI DIF STRUCTURE IS ;LI1 REP " P FEFABRI,30,000 SQUARE FEET OF FRY S .A AREA WILi. NO LUNGER B E AVAILA ,LE.

ESTIMATED CG "S... . K ,". .* ' , . . ;:) : "ESTIMATED MUP, "Li" : N: K TlK .U)Y:) iEST IMATEll C UN: i:: , i ', ,

DDFORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO I I h

I A

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEI FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONMilan Army Ammunition Plant

Tennessee4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

TEMPREPLACE INFLATABLE SHELTER 5317-20

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA







REPLACEMENT .......................................

(s000)

E. PLANNING AND DESIGN DATA (ESTI.IATE)

1. STATUSa. DATE DESIGN STARTED ............... ................ . .. .,b. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 1988.. 1(M

c. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988..

d. DATE DESIGN COMPLETED ...................

. BASISSTANDARD OR DEFINITIVE DES IGN YES No





DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

L a**~** ~ ** ,- ~.-' ~..... ..

1. COMPONENT 2.DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mob i Group 1

Rad ford Army Ammuni tinn Pt REPLACEMENTVirginia REPLACE FIVE (5) BARRICADES

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST iSOOOTEMP

226 80 532616 1,300

9. COST ESTIMATESITEM U/M U NUANTIITY COT COST

Ul alA TIY COST (11100)

PRIMARY FACILITY 1,170REPLACE 5 .A ;R , : S', LS ....- ( 1,170)

SUPPORT FACILITI E;S

SUB T(TAL 1,117, CON-! NCE.;t':" i'* k ; S. 59

o-" TOTAL C{,TK;\', . . I .229SUPERVISIO,, :N:T .50 ) 60TOTAL REQUEST 1298TOTAL REQVI-'RST 1 300I NSTALLE -

V

10 DescrKoion of Propoed Construction

COMPLETELY REMVE AN;J ED:;STR i'I BARR ICADES FOR I .I. (5) ACTIVE PR{OPELLANTOPE RAT I NG BLII.DlNC .1, 1) 1 G ;I) I N A F LOOD PLA I N.

I I . REQU IRE.M S. F- ADEQUATE: SF SUBSTD: 0 SF

PROJECT :REPLACE T1'%) MULTI-ST"RY AND TIEL SINGLE-STORY, DOUBLE REVETTED WOODEN,EARTH FILLED BARRICADES wiTH (XE MULTI-STORY ANL l:,lVR SINGLE-STORYBARRICADES. THE PROJECI MUST REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL UTILITIES, PROCESS PIPINGAND DUCTWORK PASSIN; TH(RD;I OR ATTACHED TO THE BARRICADES. ALSO, THE FLOORSAND ROOFS THROUGH THE BARRICADE PORTALS ARE TO BE REPLACED. DETERIORATEDESCAPE CHUTES AND SUPPORT FRAMING ARE TO BE REPLACED AND THE SURFACE

, DRAINAGE IS TO BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE BARRICADE FOUNDATION. UPGRADE THEELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND WIRING TO MEET THE LATEST CODES. NOTE: RATHER THANUPGRADE THE 1940'S OPEN ;,.FRINC AND NONCONFORMING ELECTRICAL AT ALL THEFAC1LITIES AT RAAP AT ()NE I IME, IT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN [ECIDEI) TO CORRECITHE CONI)ITIONS WHEN MAE,P, .'P E 1 ; PERFORMED ON INDVI DUAL BUI LDINGS. NEW

FORAO PREvIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTFRNALLYDD 1DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO .i

"4.


A FY 19 8 9_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY


Radford Army Ammunition Pt

Virginia

4. PROJECT Tl1€til ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEMP

REPLACE FIV (5) BARRICADES 532616

PROJECT : (CONT)..

WIRING AND CONDUIT ON BARRICADES CORRECTS THE MAJORITY OF THE REQUIREMENTS.

REQUIREMENT

THIS PROJECT IS THE NINTH PHASE OF AN ANNUAL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR THEBARRICADES AT THIS PLANT WHICH WERE ERECTED IN THE 1940-41 PERIOD.THIRTY-THREE BARRICADES IN PHASE 1 (FY-80) THROUGH PHASE V (FY-84) HAVE BEENCOMPLETED. REPAIRS TO MANY OF THESE BARRICADES HAVE BECOME EXCESSIVE ANDCANNOT KEEP UP WITH THE RATE OF DETERIORATION, AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY

CANNOT BE ASSURED.

CURRENT SITUATION

240 BARRICADES ARE REQUIRED AT THIS PLANT TO MEET CURRENT PRODUCTIONSCHEDULES AND FOR MOBILIZATION. A PORTION OF THESE CAN BE MAINTAINED FOR THENEXT 20 YEARS. THE REMAINING ONES SHOULD BE REPLACED BECAUSE OF DECAYING OFTHE MAJOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. A REPLACEMENT PROGRAM HAS BEEN STARTED TORENEW THE BARRICADES AT THESE BUIILDINGS, A FEW EACH YEAR, BEGINNING WITH THE

ONES THAT ARE IN GREATEST NEED OF REPLACEMENT.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:P WITHOUT ADEQUATE BARRICADES, RAAP COULD NOT CONTINUE TO OPERATE WITHIN

EXISTING INTRALINE QUANTITY DISTANCES.

ADDITIONAL :

NOT REQUIRED.

G. J. Savitske

LTC, CMLC

COMMANDER

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START: MAY 1989 INDEX: 1608

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: JANUARY 1990) INDEX: 1655ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: SEPTEMBER 1990 INDEX: 1694

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 119




Radford Army Ammunition Pt

Virzinia4. PROJECT TlTEilization Group I 5. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEMPREPLACE FlVi. (5) BARRICADES I532616

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA




C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTliE DESIRED FACILITY .............................................. 0

($000).). ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

lI: EISTNG FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A. : ']P tA E'{ T....................................... 0

(000;

_, AND DESIGN DATA (ESTIMATE)

.'TE DESIGN STARTED ......................S. PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF JANUARY 15 19F,-,. lO

PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1983.. 100DATE DESIGN COMPLETED .............. ....... NO 87

S .,)RD OR DEFINITIVE DESIGN YES NO). U:.RE DESIGN WAS MOST RECENTLY USED:


b. ALL OTHER DESIGN COSTS ......................c. TOTAL COST (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e) .........d. CONTRACT ....................................e. IN HOUSE ....................................


DDFORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO LI

.'

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY

*3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLERADFOFD ARMY AMMUNITION PT SAFETY Modernization

Virg inia UPGRADE PRIMARY OVERHEAD ELECTRICA5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 5. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST IS000


1-1( D:.' L E DI-: )ST L 2 8 8

12, 80S

S5. 5TE D 5 ) 740

To'TAL% 1,11 '' 14, 188

TTA~. H14,200

0)

10, Description af Propos~ed Constrixtion

- . . -. i:2:lmrrovo-r'r s are requi red to enistire r,-! b e l ct rapow-r :11n - provlilsf. operation of the electrical distribution system

teO ny,: rt:. t). pow.: rhnuse . By the present (lay standards and codes the

1 Itl L 0-c: T-,,: it considerably Inadequate ini both phvysical and

Acti~'.arctr~tis.Circuits going out of the p)OW-'rhous, ' are too

close, to,,'ther. When an electrical fault occurs on one, circuit, it sometimespropajgates to oth,,r circuits by elec trical arc ing which causes unnecessaryproduction curtailments and hazards to plant personnel in congested areas

(main road from Gate No. I and combined shops). NOTE: This is Phase Ilportion of the original Project 5872225 (Overhaul of Electrical DistributionSystems). Phase I of the project was submitted under Project 5872225. Theseconditions have led to an assigned Risk Assessment Code of 3. In order to

alleviate this hazard and provide adequate capacity for modernization theentire distribinion system must be altered to remove many of these circuits,from the powerhouse. To accomplish this task, major modifications to the

d st r i ut ior, are I is t (( be low:

FO0RMA PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY SE UJSED INTERNALLYDD I DEC 7e 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. -

IA


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRADFORD ARMY AMMUNITION PT

Virg inia

4. PROJECT TIfttil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBERSAFETY ModernizationUPGRADE PR IMARY OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL Dl STRI 892 519

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION (CONT)..

( I) Reduction of the numiber of 2.4KV circuits feeding out of thle

powerhouse! (to reduce wiring congestion), limiting the number of 2.4KV

C I rc:Ui I,, to are-a nlea r the powe rhouse whoere the re a ro many 2.3KV motorIs

2Tht- remaining plant area to be converted to a 12.47 KV sy'Stem byexpand!ing time existing 12.47 system with loop concept and sectionalizingswitches.

(3) Expand thle 69)KV substation capac ityv at 1st Rolled Powder and TNT forfuture projected loads in modernization and mobilization plans.

c :U ii. 'xlsing12.4 7KV pr immary (Iis trlbut ion svs tem II ino hemain

I n' L t the p re0Sen1 t- y ,In u:i 1 r-qmii riements.

high re sistanc ground ing: for tli, exist'n an rpsed 4800 1 ! i S th1a t w;Ill c on ti1n u,- to- be fed b)y t 1- 2 .4KV aInd! 12 .47KF

p r,, m-miln p1lant area.

P, E. k v A 1) E Q U,-T E k v S U bST D: 0 kvE:K 'C

To -,sur- n nucd prod t ion by, correc t In,,, haza rd ous defi1-1c ionc les o f theihut men sv~ecat RAAP tha" I S liu, served at 2.41KV from

W.1 . 1 rm . rr, I Z:1 t 1,- 11 -'X I Ie I Iv~ r o d -cc

'I On21t el:.dWill rdethcoes.' iVcircuits

o,, 'Vt:lIL 1em to Sever fro i te pow-rhIoW,- I tius mc 1n m ii zr I laIul Itpfrom~ one. circ uit to adjacent cir-CUit-s and LO r7,dus' M (A)i I I Zit ionl

an.( Trodernmzzt~ion loads on the powerhouse. Aditionally, thlt RAC of 3condi1tions onl theit main plant area would be eliminated.

This proj]ic t hams been ass igne-d RISK ASSESSMENT CODE OF 'i whi-- :mwas! based onlthe conges ted wiring and inadequate power requi reme'nt s at tilte powe rhouse tosupply mobilization and modernization loads. Therefore, the existingconditions cannot improve unless immediate actions are taken. Thle originalP-15 for tis project was submitted in February 1980.

CURRENT SITrUATIONThe preventive maintenance program has been greatly accelerated, majormaintenance projects, such as: pole replacement, power lines replacement andmodifications are being made. Extra precautions are taken for pliwer outages,shut downs and for safe-ty of personnel which curtails produ,-tien.

* DD 1FORM l9cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 19cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO -

%W


FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY I I " '

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRADFORD ARMY AMMUNITION PTVirginia

4. PROJECT T11fttjil ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

SAFETY Moderniza tion

UPGRADE PRIMARY OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL DISTRI 892519

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED :The electrical distribution system will continue to operate with knownhazards to personnel and equipment. We will continue to have unnecessarypower outages which curtails production at RAAP.

ADDITIONALAn economic analysis will not be performed; as safety and modernizatio., notproduction or project payback, is the reason for this project. However, theproduction capability is dependent upon successful execution of thisproject.

G. J. SAVITSVF

LTC, ORDCCOMMANDER - RAAP

ESTIMATED CS;TI,':LTI N OTAPT: APRIL 1989 INDEX: 1623ESTIMATED MDC I UT OF CONISTFUCTION: AUGUST 1990 INDEX: 1682ESTIMATED CYU)TI:> COMETION: JANUARY 1992 INDEI.X: 1739

4

,4

.5o

DD 1FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. 1.22



3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRADFORD ARMY AMMUNITION PT

4. POJEC Tiifti iza io Grop 15. PROJECT NUMBER

UPGRADE PRIMARY OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL DISTRI 821

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATELi) AI;'UAI. COST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 222, 120

($000)B. NUIMBER OF AlDITI()NAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY

OUT .HE F VD.:T '11' OF THlE PROPOSED FACILITY....................0(PEOPLE)

C. ESTIMATE) LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAINTHE DESI:FEf FACIITY...................................... .2,115,475

($000)D. ESTIMATE:) LIAF-CYCLI: COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE ETTN FAIIT :I NEW FACILITY IS AR F PA -%................................................ ... 3, 530, 355

* ($000)

S T 1".

* FPE:TCY !!PLETE AS OF JANUARY 1 5 1 9,08. 1 U)

P E ECEINT COf, TLETE AS OF OCTOBER 1 1988. 10)D.TE I)ES IG, COMPLETED ............................ '

.. ,.r ) .. .A..~ RECENTLY USEI):

3 . COST TuTAL. $ 000,a. PRODUCT ION OF PLANS AND SPECS................b. ALL OTERDES IGN COSTS........................

TOTAL COST .c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e)..........d . CONT RACT.......................................e. IN HOUSE.......................................

*4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) ........ APE 8(

' VDD 1FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

UA

1 COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY I:7

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE Mz5bi I ,roup I

Radford Army Ammunition Pt REPLACEMENT

Virginia REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 930

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST IS000)TEMP

851 12 9532615 3706. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY cosT OSTCOST (1100011

PRIMARY FACILITY 337REPLACE BRIDGE LS .. .. 337)

J,

SUPPORT FACILITIES

S L' T )TA L 33 7. CON}',TINJENIJY PEECENT 5 .rO'.

. , . TTA iL C(ONT -P. 7: CC.)?' 3 5,..

SUPERVISION, ,,SPECI & ( 1 5.507'

TOTAL REQUEST 373

TOTAL REQU'ST R: 'N 37.

I NS TALLE E(,'........ ."THE. APPRP )

_ 10. Dscription of Propooed Construction

#',(1) DISMANTLE ANI) REMOVE EXISTING WOOD BIEII)CE WH IC; 5ESTPDTED TI;

VEHICLES WITH MAXIMUM WEIGHT OF 8 TONS. (2) DESIGN AD CONSTRUCT A NEW

BRIDGE TO CARRY AASItTO IHS20 LIVE LOADING WITH A VE-T ICAL CLEARANS E FROM TOP

OF RAIL TO TIHE TNDE RSTRI,'TUPE OF 22 FEET, 1-INIX.1Y M F. . - FEE'l AND) A

FOOT WALKWAY ON ONE S IDE.

11. REQUIREMENT: 65 LF ADEQUATE: 0 LF SUBSTD: 65 LF

PRO.JECT :

REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING DOWNGRADED WOOD BRIDGE WITH A CONCRETE AND STEEL

STRUCTURE TO CARRY AASHTO HS20 LIVE LOADING.

REQUIREMENT :RETURN THE BRIDGE TO DESIGN LIVE LOADING TO BE UTILIZED BY ALL PLANT TRAFFIC

AND PREVENT CLOSING THE ROAD CAUSING ALL VEHICLES To TRAVEL ILON(;ER ROrES.

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD I DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

......................". -.-. ..... . ' %


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


Radford Army Ammunition PtVirginia

4. PROJECT TI'tbh I ization Group 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

REPLACEMENT TEMP

REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 930 9532615

CURRENT SITUATION

THE EXISTING DOWNGCRADED BRIDGE IS RESTRICTED TO LIGHT TRAFFIC AND HEAVY

TRAFFIC LiAS TO TRAVE. LONGER ROUTES.

IMPACT IF NOT PRO\IDED :

IF THIS Bi-lI !F. IS NO[, KEPLACED AND THE SETTLEMENT CONTINUES, THE ROAD WIIL

BE CLOSED CAI'SING ALL VEHICLES TO TRAVEL LONGER ROUTES AND WILL HAVE AN

IMPACT ON IPlR)DUC TI N EFFICIENCY.

ADDITIONlECC) (),>.,C JI KATI"UN ! IN THE P-15.

G. J. SAVITSKE

LTC, ORDCCOMMANDE R-RAAP

SEST YAT. C "Fi',TI S'i AFIT: JANUARY 1969 I NI)EX: 1616

F t T' *': ." ... , " ,'CTIO N: MAY NI)' Y' 162 7.JV< I.',.L , : "?" i: Y? E T OCTODEE iQ " ' :N1)";"

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

D1 DEC 76 19cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

* ~~ % %% N ~ %,*~~'.%

|% -


ARMY FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

* 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONRadford Army Ammunition Pt

Virginia

4.PROJECTTtiIZ1-t ion Group 15. PROJECT NUMBERREPLACEMENT TEMP

REPLACE BRIDGE No. 930 SPLMETLDT 9532615

A. ESTIMATE-i NX.X C0<1T TO OPERATE PROPOSED) FACILITY 5

B . NUMF Fl P .. L E S ONNE1L NECESSARY TO CARRY (0 0

VT IE~hX VTOE PROPOSED FAC LI TY .....

C. EST IMATED1 L VCY L CO)ST To OPERATE AND) MA INTA t IPE PLE

THE DESIRFI) FACILITY.............................................. 403($000)

D. EST IMATFI'1 l-YL COST TO OPERATE AND MAI, I'A I NTI IE E X1 ... T . ~.'F NEW FAc.I LI TY I S A

........ .............................. 0

($0)00)

................................

S.... . ............... EST..ATE

Ti C E r)'C . E TE.......................

. COTRAC*TI

TN HOUSE.....................

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED) ........ X0

V DD 1FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BEC USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHA~USTED PAGL NO.


FY 19 8q MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA "ARMY


Twin Cities Army A:.mmo Pt Additi.n

Minnesota Package DoiILrs

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST 3000)*; TEM P

821 90 5201-22 5609. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST I1110MI

PRIMARY FAPILITY 503lfntail P.CtK. hi . - 1 ....' ( 120)

S''P! ,RT FA&lL:. S

T ' . I L ,(

S : 'i:.. N ' . . . . .. ! . 25

"1

" I".'I:\L . , . .. ..

T PTAL RE VE E Sii

10 Descriotlon of PrOpoMKd Construco'o

nstal I two s t c iL..n,,d pIiki e hoi . , 17 lii' boi1,-r in

"i a.,nt to bu, n 5 , n'c,., rv I, : it ,n1. . *Xist 1i1

struct ur,'s an. *quip'ront to accomoat,., ti i w n I i it i,..

1 1. REQUIREMENT: 350 tiP ADEQUATE: 0 11P SUBSTD: 350 liP

PROJECT :

Provide steam during non-heating season to mett process steam package

boilers in or near subject buildings, rather than central steam plant.

FOR44 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

I

I/ - I / : ' " '. . . . " " " " "* "' "* * "" " " " " " - . . . . ... '-

1. COMPONENT ~.2. DATE

ARMY FY 19 8 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA .--

3- INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONTw'in Cit i,'s Ar'nv 'lirmo Pt

17'ur -n- the non-hoa Oinj s,,..)f thtbv permltt in

-, nto B 1 1 irv~s 10(3 :ind 502.

i [ -t on lint di ing th,,S0 t':~~in7?

N '

1I.COMPONENT 2. DATEjFY 19 89 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

Twin Cities Army Amimo Pt

Minnesota

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERAdd i t o TEMPPackage Boil, rs 5201-22

Des tn cu~n,,rpt is m ft n-il compirt ion bv arche tect-engineer retained by

1~ oor.Schul!T'i odor, Schul U,

~r n rsRpresentative

C l 9814 INDEX: 162130C 11,Ell 1989 INDEX: 1650

. . ~ i : Q~vINDEX: 1 6()'

DDFR 31 RVOSEIIN MYB SDITRAL AEN

I E 6UTI XASE

N%

-I. COMPONENT 2. DATE -

I FY 19 8 9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA -ARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONTwin Cities Army Ammo PtMinnesota

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERAdd i tion TEMP

Package Boiers 5201-22

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANN..',L CCST TO OPERATE PROPOSED FACILITY 94

(000)B. NUMER OF AD)'TI 'AL PERSONNEL NECESSARY To CARRY

'UTii-. E-NCTIN ,V THE PROPOSED FACILITY ........ 0(PEOPLE)

C. EST IMATED L PE-CYCI.E COST To OPERATE AND M AINT.\ITHE DESIRED FACILITY. ...............................

$o000)D. ESTIMATED, L:FE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN

THE EX IS, T N I'AC:I TTY IF NEW' FACILITY IS AREPLA(CEU'- ............................................

h ' : ,.. • o o ° o ° ° ° ° ° o o ooo .

E. T, 7T , E , 1

.;,'.'1 ...'"Z .2 ; .''~ ' E E , .- .' ." ",, : ., . .= I .. , .. 0'C

T

T) K, 0'..Z E; OF , PLINS ANDS ilOF .... . ......... 0

. ".E c.... :. C PL ETE......................AN 87

........................................

. : . . . .. .... ... .

' ' 5. CyST (TA".. - SHOO; .,

aPRODUCT ION OF PLANS ANDI SPECS.................., b. LI. C.THER DESI; >AN ISS........................"'

-; . "I IAL ",, c . . V ' , 2+- T'(. ...... +b ,._2+ . ..... NA

• .N HOUS E..................................................29

4. CONSTRUCTION START DATE (PLANNED .............. APR 89

.,~.

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDIT{OWNS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

S%

i. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 19 S9 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT r:TLE 1Vb GroupI

Lake~ Citv Army, Xnr,, Ad1d It I il Al terationMIiss 3ur i Pvrotechn V Si t y Enhance

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE T PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST ($0001TEMP

"o '2 T892245 830q 9, COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST COST0

PRIMAR\ 645Aux :~ n '. i LS ry --, p 529)

1~i" .: S- 80)-V F1.5 - -- 36)

SI ~1 Fl . .105

ij;)

-- 9)

750

38

*10. D,,cr~p%;on of Pr~ooed Construction

.<~: .u; : i~ P.:: rs m**ir:~t~~ msnew , has. lici

1 R'.E '');, P T H,,'. . S I'l- STD) n SF

V PRu(J FC

T1 i I. pro t 1 nv olvys i f i nt :iI Lt Lm of T no w gn r at Ion q Lqui pm - nnt a nd- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i 1F\' ~ - n~'py lis mn an u f a C tur-i1ng -i r - I

1 inn, w i. ~ -in pyoT, i- ni m I ulriny .ir-i! -it L.SAtd

FORME 7 19 PRE VIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDO i.........................1 UNTIL EXHAUSTED AEOO

A.. . . . . . . . . . . . .. e-,.-.L

1. C9MPONENT 2 DATEFY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


Lake City Army Ammo PlantMissouri

4. PROJECT TITLE Mcobi izit 12 rw ' 5 PROJECT NUMBERA!Jd itI ion ra t ,t I oi TB M,. IP

Pyrot-echnic Saftotv Enhanc, T8922?45

PROJEC T (CON;T).

wil I In, I ull tli Ili ion m: a tr'MOLr matori al hand 1 1 i v~

N ~~~L wi '.'1-. i t ro,,oto 1 por form i isur fi

ripraor s.p'l r ~i..- iinprovo,! Lvthogr:Jut:~n o''-p ~ t xpoi tilzi TrIItori,~is. 'nt, 1prcbl,. wih

Im M, l' 2i2aT: 1! t'ti'5rnl. -i is

- V A. (I T7 -. . T l U t . 'I

y1 r I.- T. 07 i r r sin ri on 7 ti a i'I L -i.i.~ ~ T!' fi TI"* U., s ils v po rfrm II tU

'ir 'j V*1 : : . 1p. 1. 11 s~ p. r f" ril 1 th"

I~2 r2 1 ;1! ) -,1 r )".I -,- l n 'I. -r E u -1 currtontly rei'1 , upon

r- I " '. 1 n - 7, 1-

This proj.'ct invollv's th' ins L.il1I-3iLion u. Tii, k quipment an-cfacl!Lites to 6iiprovk! safotv in thu pyrot. -. hnics manufacturing arto atLCAAP.

O-P N

FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDI.TIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NODI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED

IV

I% %"I

1. RMYFY 1989_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 12 DATE


S 1; 0 Il

4. PR JC T. I T ,i (i . OETN M E

1,'

D D 1F 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

% %

1 COMPONENT 2 DATEFY 1980MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

) ARMY3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

I. -i v. "vi T 'n

* 4. PROJECT TITLE 5 PROJECT NUMBER

...................................................

1 7

. .. .

.. . .2 .: . . . .2...

. T P [!'C T 19 S -FAR Pl A TE P L A E-N 1)................

ODFORM 39cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD DEC 78 31 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

J, 4' J

1.COMPONENT 2 DATE


3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4, PROJECT TITLE

L , n, S :Ir .: :rlv \ un t .it Pt A,.I t ion Al trIt o,1n

T,.x.is Produ t i on C.nt rl I Fac5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST ($000)

, T E MH P

5 89 2 -4 1 4109 COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M OUANTIT'Y COST (11000

X l l X 1)l r

T %

. . . ..... . . . . . . . . .o,.: -. I - 21.

%"

' .X.. . . 1 1

10 Delr Omon of POf on! Conliruct or

.. ;'+ : .. . . . . . . . , . .: ri . , ".F'I > , , ; ,' ( L ' " , T : . ' ,

- ,. i, , i .' b . 0 r,,i',' ., j r jand Iacat ,I in ti. nv i~..

I , b w - n I. v- installation of -ondl:tl\ r , , . pr ,l i S for"" f I j,_I4 ' .- ,s t w.,t r coll ct: on., and upgra, ti),r >t,.- m ut 1 L , 's. A

-,mlr u l, r ' UI : I I I .:onlt rol svstem will 1w rqnir, for L, \%s 1 thI u 7,

Sco r ' )ri', r , ,In in thm pyrotechnic raw m :-trial sto r. r,, , ct tih now

J[I lb, X<

,. REY- :REMENT: 1,448 SF ADEQUATE: ... .... 0 SF

* FOM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY GE USED INTERNALLYDD 1 DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO. I


ARMY FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLone St a r A!r Pl\ .

Texas

4. PROJECT TITLE5.POETNM R

PROJECT

This p ... r. n, * sif. t v by

K~, F 'R '

1 ' a %aM

p D..!. 11

* te r

reus' nb y

w lil n: 1

m r - 1:-

Lncre2mont..,n

lb. increments.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEIh

If this project is nu(t approved. I Lon., S-tar AAP :ann,.i fully ivmp -nlt [11'% MIGRAD SystEmsn noedoe for current pyrotechnic produ-t Ion roqui r-ments . Tbw

pyrotechni-c oporation inbuild ng G-313 wi 11 cont inu as is.xpi ,

operators to hazardous materials 10 tTT'! isis nrl frequontly than what cold b'.achieved wi th the n-w MI GRAD) Sys tern.

-4L

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PG ODD 1DEC 76 13kUNTIL EXH-AUSTED PG O


FY 19 8_9MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLont, S a r Arn mv :vn m

i i on Pt

To x,

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERA",! i' on .Fl 11. ,:. E "t

A 1 p . : , - : ,, tak, n t o , ns Ir, ti h:t t i., twa I t , th,.

W ,.. t i r a I I t 1 ~. j t *v ,

1mr' I rl -'T rn' -

+: • .....-.

r ', ) i P. 1 11

• I I l1

S. . . . . . . ..... : ,:

t.

9X

I"

D'D "" 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1 E 6UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

4%


ARMY FY 19-LQMILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


t4 9 124

'4 ..-. ; L~Y....................................

* CT ...................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

* II.. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . .

...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(w.t.......

). .. . '.......................................

INFl'Y........................................

* .'~ CNSTv:;:~NSTART 1).?4 F (PLANNED)................

DD 1FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

I.COMPONENT 2. DATE

ARMY FY 19 00 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


1. ni-h n r A-:, V 'T' I: ", Modern iz,itlOln

Tcx~i~z I Pyro Saf-t V Eni~in,-,rnnt

L.5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 4SCATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST 4"000

TEMP

1 589224582g. COST ESTIMATES

UNIT COSTITMU/M GUANTITY COST ($0001

30

1>1 3

10 Doebcription of Prjoi.sICo,,itruct'o

Ix .. .

U..~~~i'< .:. ri n. a mnt~ h.izirdous traylig. drvin -,. i.n pr .I nllt a~

I~ -t io 7V:. r I r- no ani tab I, ox is t ing fac iiit ifPS it n(I'n

I: n.~'~t-r .71i MIGRAD) m ixors require, more h..ad rrnim thmin

p r v i Ii. x xI t 1 n ~ V1 I I itf: s . A t fr at ion ot x 1 St I n I, i I I i

nw c: on i t-r: t Ii n t o ratI s o t he ro n wea .1 1I 1) "he

nw': th AM C -R 3Q,5 j QQ d at - d A Ig us t 19 85 r,,.q uI r~mn s't a[

The, o p,'rat i ons I rea o f thef, nt-w mi1x fa- I Ii t v w IlIh lve t wo mix"r l iv,.

fouir raw ia'*r ialI surge bays , two fi1n Ished m Ix sufr g.o lays , P.1Ss"Iy "w..vs ,Inf

inert cart aol blen-r huc ket cond itioning area andi a ! i in o Th

operations are-a of tfaci is 1; pproximately 3700 sq ft. WA 1Psi,'the mixe-r and suirpge bays is to bo in accordance with TM ')--I Mi. kcqui roemn-

FOAMPOREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYD D I DEC'76M 139 1 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

".r'J

'.n -'A:c.-.; :-


FY 19 89MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONLonghorn Army AmmunU ion Pt

Texas

.1 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERM." Ho ,'rn1 :,it p ,:P "'1 P

Pvro S %fit Erhalrc,t'nt 5892245

DESCR I T I T 10 PROPOSEI) CONSTRUCT O ( CONT)

, an,r. . rrin.., U: t ,' S r,)o n fac i i tI es. ,(1 i nt ,,s, ik; prIt , t I II

,i,.it '. v ,.'.* ' *:'. .'t: is to be determi n d b% II, D.I ; i A .',y. ,

I v t. L !it in an ,xiSting pvr n,,Pi , , , ti .ii itv.I V t ir; P , v ; . p

I . . . : i; S ii I 1 3t i t n o f A M p' i, .r . 2 .' , i thii

i n h: itv -on , i nning iS t ,I ,: v ... ! til' m ix,'l inr9A - 11. ot .oI' c i n,, r t o . r ,,v . 2 : , . P,.r -i t 1 P

t :- ,n: : o pn ... i n ,a n . ' w : : n n1. 1r ;; I t

' ,:'.. " : " . : , : - : '; ! . ;,.' , ~ i P., . : . , : , n , - .' " , ,

:.' , , . .. ,.

.",J

, ~~ ~ p..r,i ri,)ns .,n.1 71115ra s. "F i call b, o n, !... ,' .. . , I ,. ...

DVI .' 1 E

'"p

This project is needed to provide, procossing inprv,t'M'nts which Will

enhanc:- safetv. Numerous flashes have occurred at this, and othf.r,

pvrot.'chni s produ- ing plants. Th.so flash,s hay, r,'sult" i in injur io,

fatal t i ' o qui pn nt and fac i Ity damage, lost produr t ion t im, and

DD FORM 13 9 1c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYLI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO is

1 ,.,:;,.,-;..:,.', . : .:...-, -: ,.-:-,.,:..-,., ..'-,:.L . -... "-'1. .-.. ,-: -----.--..... .,.-.-,, .. ... .-':-.,.-': .,.. ....

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1939 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA -


Longho~rn Army\ Nnmun., IonP'

wh Ic 1) :i r I r . . :"1 p~:s oI -n r equ i r, m 1x i ,,, ind

mill i-< irv t, .W m-,i '11j o.' p-.. I.r~ t ion, reqili re excoss ive

rema in ;i

)m p a,: in i is'

[It

Pb 11

ESTIMATED CONSTR(-UCitWN START: APR I L 1989 INDEX: 1623

ESTIMATED MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION: OCTOBiER 1989 INDEX: 1650

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: APR1I1L 1990 IN[DEX: 1666

DD FORM 1391C PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PGNI 1DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTEDPAEN I

r-p

COMPONENr 2. DATE

ARM FY 198" MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONL.nghorni Arriv . I'

.9A.

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

......................

......................

9.',, .......................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

P lA .. .. . . . . . .

FOM 39C REIOS DIIOS AYE SE ITENAL

44 DIDC7 NI XASE AEN

MW.

I.-'

D ., r-.KP.. . . .

plW71%DD -OR PRV-U EDTIN MA -E USE INTERNALLYDEC76 NTI EHAUTEDPAG N

**~S~ ' / / ~ -~.-. *9. 4 - , .*A' .. -

A.RMYOEN FY 19 '*MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2DT

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4 PROJECT TITLE

En i I- i r 10 1 1r oid ))

-5 PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATECOR', CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST IS000

5'Il I Mi)

9 COST ESTIMATES

COST (COST

h.1 I T t I i- o

J,

F 0% MaSE IINSM YO s DrT R A L

e~~~~~~~~I DD I> DE 619 UTLEHUSE tN

%T

1 COMPONENT 2DT

ARMY ~ FY 19_ MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2DT

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

4 PROJECT TITLE5POETNME

IT'

2 Ls

L 04

% %%

I 'COMPONENT 2DT


3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4 PROJECT TITLE

T XAlI t e t it '1 11

KEDF EX I' t; F K( Mt A 'T 1

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST IS000

T EMPI

2 7oIOF

) CST ESTIMATES - TITEM U/Mk QUANTITY~ COST I ($000)

10 IC Uctoiop of Pr'xoo~ ConvIruciion

~I ii ir I F,.- n ' (,r c) un 1 r 11'..

t T .x Is t Inp i . I 11 it 1,;! .ind~ t i I t ' '''5 2 t

I pi n , s f Cli ipt Ir ), AMC -f R 3 I(H.- . - I. ric I It t I ri q p , r n i I i - it IT t 1;I n ,,

It 1.I), pI C)t t I In rlqtli*re-MhtlLS 1IV., o>C I j .,II'n 7 1 "n' tr I~p II- -r,lt I n ' t 1 Pu T

F ORM PFIEVIOUS EDITIONS MAY Of USED INTEP4NALLYDO D DEC 76 1391 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO.

I COMPONENT 2 DATE

F Y 1989 MI L ITAR Y CONSTR UCTION PROJECT DATAARMY


Lnhorn Arm%, f

40%4. RJCIL 5 PROJECT NUMBER

REP EXI, T' E"* 2 010

6o'

W. 1

L it l z I -. . .

FOR)' PREVIOU EDIION MAY BE USAED VNT :;ILST' I I

I OEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO -

441 9c~,~ . . ... .. .. Jq

1 CO MPONENT 2 DATEFY 19 81 'MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA •

ARMY3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

LonL ,;,, o T \ I v ' 1.. 7 i 1l 7"

4 PROJECT TITLE 5 PROJECT NUMBER

CoT I

I i't. om V,1, I St ( T E

-" I, K? . 2701 - ,'

' I .. i'1 : ( C0 N L1 .

9q

I.~ :: r I o I I r I t 12 III

Iv s'I Awrl - ,

- I

• . : .: 11 1: . ,1. :9.ps 1 i ,ti p,o r . r L h) o t-,0 c t I t

-jpr r.:n ii v riot1)T r f10 lq i r I- * lf inl W I Iysis

t 1 . 1 1 1 . t o it I I- ii v t Wo .'1 a ow poss 1)-

" n m i x ') I- r p ". s 'in WV) I C id b.l...Ck '- 3f. 'rf s from t , .

SFORM 39cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY1DIDEC 76 191cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO I-.

"

% ~ .

1 COMONENT FY 19 8 q MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ~DT

ARMY


Lo h r n A\t p ill",'u io01i

KE, EXA.* 1,2 0

FORM 19cPREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY FIE USED INTERNALLYDD IDEC 76 l9cUNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

% ~1 COMPONENT 2DTFY 19 "MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


IILMN'ALDATA

* R1 'AF'I- ANM) MIA I A IN

*~~~ .) .l ) : * - AN A 1 1i IN

. .. .1- .S .A

...

DT PLA"NN'l);...............

DD F ORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYPAEN

DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTEDPAEN

.. .a . . . SW


AFY 19q MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA7 ~ARMY"• "

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4 PROJECT TITLE

T, I n Cit i - s m ,:p, P-',:,

n i&~ so t, .; : - c 2too5. PROGRAM ELEMENT S. CATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 18 PROJECT COST ISOOO)

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COSTCOST ISOOO)

1T

SP ,* . .E '-', II

1, ,1 W

__I_____________________________ I I hat __ __

10 ; Dec '~n- 01m POQr-stv :iiid sucT-

DD ir"~",19 NILEHUTDPG O

. . . .. ..

DD ,.. DEC 7 139 UNTL EHASTE PAE O.

~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1. COMPONENT 2 DATE


3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONTwin Cit 1- s Army .mi [III,' Sot.

. 4. PROJECT TITLE 5 PROJECT NUMBERI TEM l'

I.~ I~ S~ m .. 2800-8.

,.

C !KR E T S T 11'

P-' tT 1 1I ., t , V WOOd st r-U: t LIT-'S tha-t do not

L . .. I, I I IS w i . I I I ,

'.4' I v

k~X 11 qq

No 'W, F

N*,. ,I : t t or six

92.'

4 ': . !. ' 4-' N...

a .o

"" , :" .: , ',: -,i : . * "*.4-i ): 5,,2,

o 39cP.VOU DTIN MY8.UE I.I I NA)EX

- ¢,D 0IC7 NILaHUTO AEN

!1.RS

N .. , , . i' p , , , , . , , , ,""" , .""- . . . *"" ".r . . - - - - " - - -

1. COMPONENT 2DT- FY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY VDT3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

iw in C t .i \rmv Am m o

4 PROJEC TIL RJETN ME

. . . . . . . ... I .. .......

T 1... .. .....%N .......... A

DD FOAM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYPAENI DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTEDPAEN

1 COMPONENT 2 DATE

FY 19 80 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARMY


HeLS~)N FMY .\M'1'N -- 2I SAll/ toi it loll

il Ot Il SF Corre'ctLions

5. PR~OGRAM ELEMENT S. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8 PROJECT COST (5001

9 ~ COTSTTMAEITEM U/m QUANTITY COST COST0

q -

pr~' vl ln'!

r i fi , ') I I 71'. 1

~~~~~O~~~~ t.coo I?~uo. ot~Cr

4.P1400EVIU fDTO SM YO S 0I~,PIDD o 619 NI EHUTDPG.O 1-

%. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. %v**

1 COMPONENT 2ATFY 199 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

ARMY


~. T I Z I 1 1

FOAME 7 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY E USED INTERNALLY1 EC76UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

I COMPONENT DT

ARMY ~FY 199MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2DT


4. PROJECT TITLE 45 PROJECT NUMBER

1K .~ .r'c~n~2701/2

V (()NT)

............................. . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . ..

UNTI EXHASTE PAG N

. w .n o rr

-S%

NI 4 wl

1 COMPONENT j2 DATEFY 1989 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


110L- TON ARMIY AMML'N - -!;

:1~~ L Er

* . I aT 1 0 (1 F I T C I ~ 1 SI x I I 1S

;i I I s i th a: s,: .1 rV

11" Du in, thi p.r I~ C I.

T n I d d 1 L In Oil < t L

T 1 t Sr~' i .1 V

FORM PREVIOUS FUITIQNS MAY 8C USED INTERNALLY -DI DEC 91 UNTIL EXH4AUSTED PAGE NO

% EC7

3A * * * ~ *~-.. - - - .,- '. ,.* . .

1.I COMPONENT 12 DATE

_FY 1989MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


HOLSTON ARMY AMM N TI ' -

Tennessee

4. PROJECT TITLE 5 PROJECT NUMBER

A. . . . . . . . . .. ii,1

Al er.l 1 T[ EM P-. E e ,: i Lk r- : " t'' " 7 0 1 12

- T , -I-

d .:

'." ',2 '.1'[ b pr ';. r , ,',I ::M :: -t Y,

1,%

.F'". - F . )AII , ) J p

DD 1 ORM 3 1 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY

DEC 76 UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO

, S': P

.. . . . . . . .. 5 5'!..' L " {' { : ' p..'.-. : .. .7-.

1 COMPONENT 2 DATEFY 198"MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


'TEM

a~100

. . . . . . . . . .

..........................................................

...................................................

FORM PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLYDD DE l6391c UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 5

% EC7

V...

.ps.

- -' -~ r~.:~c. ~-- C)

'.-' C) £~2

- C) ~- ~-

J - -- - Cl-. -~~ - _ C)

I I I I I g .7- I '~Z.----. C)

- - .7- -- .7- -.7 - -. ~

.8

*~:.~A ~

~ -~ - -

I -~ - - - -

I I I I I I I

* . -- --

iA

4 1 - - - - - -

A-.'-A

-a~.7-'Thc~

cc - -~ - .--

- CC

Z ~ -~ .7> CC C....~ ~ E -~ - - '.- -

C -- ~C C.N.

I - - - -i I I-C ~C

'C

-C

01

Zn -

-Z - ZN -~ . -- r3

Dc'.-

-. ~ ~ -~ ~ ~U1 UWWU

w

I,'U

'TM

'TM

'U

'U'U

** u- *g w u S S S q W S V 'V 5 6 ~V S.- ~ r, r

~

-Ai84 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JUSTIFICATION OF … · iui: department of the army justification of...

Documents

Transcript of -Ai84 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JUSTIFICATION OF … · iui: department of the army justification of...