ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MATRIX ABOUT AHP. The AHP Matrix.
Ahp Analysis
of 20
-
Upload
ajise-omolara-ajibike -
Category
Documents
-
view
234 -
download
0
Transcript of Ahp Analysis
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
1/20
risk preferences
risk analysis of uk oil companies
Alternatives
risk avoidanceavoid the risk
risk reductionreduce risk
risk mitigationremove risk
Criteria
risk preference
uncertain energy policy
access to reserve
operationl
cost control
environmental
management
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
2/20
Preferences and priorities
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
3/20
Preferences in context of: risk preference
operationl vs. uncertain energy policy
7 : 1
access to reserve vs. uncertain energy policy
4 : 1
operationl vs. access to reserve
2 : 1
uncertain energy policy vs. cost control
6 : 1
uncertain energy policy vs. management
1 : 1
environmental vs. uncertain energy policy
5 : 1
cost control vs. operationl
6 : 1
cost control vs. management
4 : 1
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
4/20
environmental vs. cost control
9 : 1
cost control vs. access to reserve
6 : 1
operationl vs. management
1 : 1
operationl vs. environmental
1 : 1
environmental vs. management
6 : 1
management vs. access to reserve
7 : 1
access to reserve vs. environmental
5 : 1
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
5/20
Criterion
Weight
uncertain energy pol
11.72
access to reserve
16.25
operationl
13.17
cost control
19.35
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
6/20
environmental
27.11
management
12.39
Preferences in context of: uncertain energy policy
risk avoidance
8
risk mitigation
9
risk reduction
4
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
7/20
Alternative
uncertain energy pol
n
88.89
risk reduction
44.44
risk mitigation
100
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
8/20
Preferences in context of: access to reserve
risk avoidance
6
risk mitigation
9
risk reduction
5
Alternative
access to reserve
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
9/20
n
66.67
risk reduction
55.56
risk mitigation
100
Preferences in context of: operationl
risk avoidance
6
risk mitigation
8
risk reduction
9
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
10/20
Alternative
operationl
n
66.67
risk reduction
100
risk mitigation
88.89
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
11/20
Preferences in context of: cost control
risk avoidance
5
risk mitigation
8
risk reduction
6
Alternative
cost control
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
12/20
n
62.5
risk reduction
75
risk mitigation
100
Preferences in context of: environmental
risk avoidance
5
risk mitigation
7
risk reduction
8
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
13/20
Alternative
environmental
n
62.5
risk reduction
100
risk mitigation
87.5
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
14/20
Preferences in context of: management
risk avoidance
2
risk mitigation
8
risk reduction
6
Alternative
management
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
15/20
n
25
risk reduction
75
risk mitigation
100
Criterion
Global weight [%]
Local weight [%]
risk preference
100
100
environmental
27.11
27.11
cost control
19.35
19.35
access to reserve
16.25
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
16/20
16.25
operationl
13.17
13.17
management
12.39
12.39
uncertain energy policy
11.72
11.72
Ranking in context of: risk preference
Alternative
Total
uncertain energy pol
access to reserve
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
17/20
operationl
cost control
environmental
management
n
62.17
10.42
10.83
8.78
12.1
16.94
3.1
risk reduction
78.33
5.21
9.03
13.17
14.51
27.11
9.29
risk mitigation
95.15
11.72
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
18/20
16.25
11.71
19.35
23.72
12.39
Comparison in context of: risk preference
Criterion
n
risk reduction
risk mitigation
uncertain energy pol
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
19/20
88.89
44.44
100
access to reserve
66.67
55.56
100
operationl
66.67
100
88.89
cost control
62.5
75
100
environmental
62.5
100
87.5
management
25
-
8/3/2019 Ahp Analysis
20/20
75
100
![Using DEA and AHP for Ratio Analysis · using AHP [33]. Recently the author has applied AHP weights as weight bounds into a two-level DEA model [34] and a com- mon set of weights](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5e7f377816c5d23c65606118/using-dea-and-ahp-for-ratio-analysis-using-ahp-33-recently-the-author-has-applied.jpg)
