AHA RAC Advocacy Initiatives April 28, 2013. Overview of Audit Concerns Recovery Auditors are biased...
-
Upload
amia-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of AHA RAC Advocacy Initiatives April 28, 2013. Overview of Audit Concerns Recovery Auditors are biased...
AHA RAC Advocacy Initiatives
April 28, 2013
Overview of Audit Concerns
• Recovery Auditors are biased due to contingency fee payments
• Recovery Auditors are not targeting widespread payment errors– RACTrac: only 38% of audits result in an overpayment determination.– RACTrac: over 40% of denials are appealed – 72% of claims appealed are
overturned in favor of the provider.
• CMS’s proposed rule that prevents hospitals from rebilling for full Part B payment for “medically necessary, wrong setting” denials outside of the timely filing window is inappropriate
• Auditors are making subjective decisions on short-stay cases, despite lack of clear policy guidance
Additional Audit Concerns
• Medical record request limits are inappropriately being used to target high-dollar inpatient claims
• Burden of case-by-case appeals is very heavy, relative to the minimal RAC investment per denial
– A single auditor can produce dozens of appeals per day, while hospitals must appeal every incorrect denial through a 2+ year, one-claim-at-a-time appeal process.
– RACTrac: 72% of appealed RAC denials are overturned in favor of the hospital.
Overburdened Appeals System
• Providers are becoming more proactive about appealing improper denials by RACs
– Hospitals are appealing 42 percent of RAC denials.– These appeals are overturned in favor of the hospital 72 percent of the
time.
• Appeals system is overburdened, but no additional resources for processing appeals are on the horizon
– QIC regularly sending out letters that they cannot meet 60-day window for making determination, offering escalation to ALJ.
– ALJs are overburdened and providers are experiencing delays in receiving determinations.
• FI/MAC and QIC are largely perceived as being less willing to overturn improper denials than ALJs
CMS Changes Rebilling Policy
• CMS published in Monday, March 18 Federal Register (Vol. 78, No. 52):– Administrator’s Ruling (pps. 16614 – 16617)
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-03-18/pdf/2013-06159.pdf
– Proposed Rule (pps 16632 – 16646) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-03-18/pdf/2013-06163.pdf
• CMS terminates Part A to Part B Rebilling Demonstration
CMS's Longstanding Policy on Rebilling
• Hospitals permitted to bill for only a limited list of Part B inpatient services, – provided the services are billed within 1 year of the provision of the
services (i.e., the timely filing period)
• AHA, five hospital systems sued HHS last year. – Legal claim: CMS’s policy is not consistent with Medicare law that
requires payment for all reasonable and necessary care – Requested remedy: Court should overrule CMS’s policy and order full
reimbursement to hospitals for the care they provided
• AHA’s view of CMS’s recent actions: – CMS’s interim policy change is a victory for hospitals; its long-term
proposed solution is not. – It is essential to continue the AHA litigation.
Administrator’s Ruling
• Establishes interim policy – Effective March 13, 2013 – Remains in effect until CMS issues final rule
• What is the interim policy established by the Ruling?– When a Medicare review contractor denies a Part A claim because the
inpatient admission was not reasonable and necessary, a hospital may submit a Part B inpatient claim for reasonable and necessary services that would have been payable had the beneficiary originally been treated as an outpatient instead of an inpatient
– Except for those services that specifically require outpatient status (e.g., outpatient visits, emergency department visits and observation services)
– Limits scope of ALJ consideration of appeals ofinpatient claims to Part A payment
• CMS proposes to pay hospitals for all reasonable and necessary Part B services that would have been payable had the beneficiary originally been treated as an outpatient instead of an inpatient – Except for services provided after an order for admission that
specifically require an outpatient status
• WHEN?– An Medicare review contractor denies a Part A claim because
the inpatient admission was not reasonable and necessary, OR
– The hospital determines, after a beneficiary is discharged, that his or her inpatient admission was not reasonable and necessary
Proposed Rule on Rebilling
• CMS proposes to apply the timely filing restriction to the rebilling of all Part B inpatient services – Requires that rebilled claims for Part B services must be filed within
1 year from the date the services were originally provided
• The Problem for Hospitals:– Recovery audit contractors typically reviews claims that are more
than a year old, so CMS’s proposal would again leave hospitals without fair reimbursement for the care they provide to Medicare patients
• Deadline to comment: May 17, 2013– Sample comment letter is available for members
online at www.aha.org/RAC
Critical Difference in Proposed Rule
AHA Advocacy on Audit Concerns
• Mar 2013: Revised RAC bill is reintroduced in US House• Nov 2012: AHA, four hospital systems filed rebilling lawsuit against HHS• Oct 2012: Introduction of H.R. 6575 in US House; AHA submitted
recommended RAC and program integrity changes to HHS OIG• Sept 2012: AHA highlighted problems with inconsistent MAC and RAC audit
protocols during meetings with GAO• Aug 2012: The AHA OPPS comment letter made preliminary
recommendations re: short-stay vs. observation cases.• June 2012: AHA submitted audit recommendations to Senate Finance
Committee
RAC Bill Reintroduced
• H.R. 6575, Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012 was introduced last October in US House of Representatives
– Bill was not adopted prior to end of Congressional session
• H.R. 1250 – the Medicare Audit Improvement Act – was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on March 19, 2013
– Institutes combined cap across RACs, MACs, CERT of 2 percent of a hospital’s claims, as well as limits by claim type (inpatient, outpatient)
– Financial penalties for auditors that fail to adhere to program guidelines or who deny a claim that is eventually overturned on appeal
– Makes publicly reported information on auditor performance available including number of claims audited, denied and claims overturned on appeal
– Permit rebilling for denied inpatient claims; remove timely filing requirement for denied claims
– Physician validation of all claim denials– Stronger statutory language to protect hospitals due
process rights for claims older than one year
AHA Next Steps on RACs
• Work with providers to engage Congress on H.R. 1250• Continued advocacy with CMS and Congress on rebilling;• Monthly meetings with CMS on RAC operational fixes;• RACTrac: Data collection for Q1 2013 just ended. Results
will be available is approximately six weeks at www.aha.org/ractrac; and
• AHA’s 2012 Audit Education Series resources are still available online for AHA members.– AHA has compiled member advisories and webinars
into a single resource, i.e. a “RAC Toolkit,” for members
RACTrac: Medical Record Requests
Wednesday, February 15Naval Heritage Center
9:30 AM
Source: AHA RACTrac Survey, January 2013. Survey results collected from 2,335 participating hospitals; 1,233 hospitals participated in Q4 2012.
Number of Medical Records Requested from Participating Hospitals, through 4th Quarter 2012
RACTrac: Complex Audit Outcomes
Wednesday, February 15Naval Heritage Center
9:30 AM
Outcomes of Audits and Percentage of Hospitals Reporting Short-Stay as Most Common Reason for Denial, through 4th Quarter 2012
Almost $1.3b in denials through
Q4 2012
Source: AHA RACTrac Survey, January 2013. Survey results collected from 2,335 participating hospitals; 1,233 hospitals participated in Q4 2012.
RACTrac: Appeals of Denials
Wednesday, February 15Naval Heritage Center
9:30 AM
RAC Denial Appeals Rate and Outcomes, 2nd – 4th Quarter 2012
Source: AHA RACTrac Survey, January 2013. Survey results collected from 2,335 participating hospitals; 1,233 hospitals participating this quarter.
RACTrac: Resource Utilization for RAC(From Q4 2012 Survey)
Percent of Participating Hospitals* Reporting Average Cost Associated in Managing the RAC Program, 4th Quarter 2012
* Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity
Source: AHA RACTrac Survey, January 2013. Survey results collected from 2,335 participating hospitals; 1,233 hospitals participated in Q4 2012.
AHA RAC and Audit Resources
AHA is Helping Hospitals Improve Payment Accuracy
•Main AHA RAC Page: www.aha.org/rac
– Newly updated to make it easier to find the information providers need
•AHA RACTrac Page: www.aha.org/ractrac; www.aharactrac.com
•AHA Audit Series: www.aha.org/auditseries
•Email RAC Questions: [email protected]
For more information visit AHA’s RAC Website:
http://www.aha.org/[email protected]
RACTrac Support: [email protected]
1-888-722-8712