Agrifood Supply Chains in the NAFTA Market Jill E. Hobbs Department of Agricultural Economics,...
-
Upload
jordan-hardy -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
1
Transcript of Agrifood Supply Chains in the NAFTA Market Jill E. Hobbs Department of Agricultural Economics,...
Agrifood Supply Agrifood Supply Chains in the Chains in the
NAFTA MarketNAFTA MarketJill E. HobbsJill E. Hobbs
Department of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of SaskatchewanUniversity of Saskatchewan
Presented to the 4Presented to the 4thth Annual North American Agrifood Annual North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium Workshop: Market Integration Consortium Workshop:
Contemporary Drivers of Integration,Contemporary Drivers of Integration, Cancun, Mexico, June 2007 Cancun, Mexico, June 2007
OutlineOutline Do borders still matter? Two hypotheses.Do borders still matter? Two hypotheses. Conceptual frameworkConceptual framework
Identify key drivers for change Identify key drivers for change Effect on Transaction costs Effect on Transaction costs Implications for supply chain relationships Implications for supply chain relationships
Challenges to cross-border supply chains Challenges to cross-border supply chains Border frictions Border frictions National policy responses to regional National policy responses to regional problemsproblems
ConclusionsConclusions
Do borders still matter?Do borders still matter?
Expectations that regional trade agreements Expectations that regional trade agreements will lead to a will lead to a deepeningdeepening of economic of economic integration, e.g. increase in cross-border integration, e.g. increase in cross-border supply chainssupply chains
If borders no longer mattered we would If borders no longer mattered we would expect to see no difference in the way in expect to see no difference in the way in which supply chains are organized within a which supply chains are organized within a country and between countriescountry and between countries
Evidence from Gravity models suggests that Evidence from Gravity models suggests that borders still matter (Jayasinghe & Sarkar, borders still matter (Jayasinghe & Sarkar, 2004; Moodley et al., 2000)2004; Moodley et al., 2000)
Two HypothesesTwo Hypotheses If borders still matter, what will be the effect on If borders still matter, what will be the effect on
vertical coordination across the border?vertical coordination across the border? Two hypotheses:Two hypotheses:1.1. Firms pursue strategy of Firms pursue strategy of closercloser vertical vertical
coordination across borders to better plan for coordination across borders to better plan for border friction and proactively provide information border friction and proactively provide information to reduce border irritantsto reduce border irritants
2.2. Firms pursue Firms pursue lessless vertical coordination across vertical coordination across borders to reduce dependency-based risks borders to reduce dependency-based risks associated with border closures, disruptions, costs.associated with border closures, disruptions, costs.
Depends on characteristics of product & position Depends on characteristics of product & position of border within the supply chainof border within the supply chain
Need a conceptual frameworkNeed a conceptual framework
Conceptual FrameworkConceptual Framework
Transaction Cost Economics Transaction Cost Economics provides insights into changing provides insights into changing nature of vertical coordinationnature of vertical coordination
Information/search costsInformation/search costs Negotiation costsNegotiation costs Monitoring & Enforcement costsMonitoring & Enforcement costs Transaction costs affect the vertical Transaction costs affect the vertical
coordination outcomecoordination outcome
Vertical CoordinationVertical Coordination Spectrum of vertical coordination Spectrum of vertical coordination
possibilities from spot markets, through possibilities from spot markets, through contracts, strategic alliances, joint contracts, strategic alliances, joint ventures, and vertical integrationventures, and vertical integration
Trend toward closer vertical coordination Trend toward closer vertical coordination in domestic agrifood marketsin domestic agrifood markets
Drivers for change: regulatory, socio-Drivers for change: regulatory, socio-economic, technologicaleconomic, technological
E.g. Food quality; food safety; ethical E.g. Food quality; food safety; ethical attributes; environment; information attributes; environment; information technology technology
External Drivers: e.g.
Socio-EconomicRegulatoryTechnology
Product Characteristics
Transaction Characteristics
VerticalCoordination
Transaction Cost Reducing Competitive Pressure
Institutional AdaptationTransacti
on Costs
Adapted from Hobbs and Young (2000)
Conceptual model of forces driving
vertical coordination
Transaction Transaction CharacteristicsCharacteristics
Changes in transaction characteristics Changes in transaction characteristics affect transaction costsaffect transaction costs
Asset specificity:Asset specificity: vulnerability to vulnerability to opportunistic behavior; incentive for opportunistic behavior; incentive for vertical integrationvertical integration
FrequencyFrequency ComplexityComplexity Uncertainty: cUncertainty: closer vertical coordination loser vertical coordination
to mitigate higher search & monitoring to mitigate higher search & monitoring costscosts
UncertaintyUncertainty
Uncertainty for buyer over Uncertainty for buyer over product product qualityquality (search costs; monitoring costs) (search costs; monitoring costs)
Uncertainty for buyer over Uncertainty for buyer over reliability reliability of supplyof supply (quantity & timeliness) (quantity & timeliness)
Price uncertaintyPrice uncertainty for buyer & seller for buyer & seller (time lag)(time lag)
Uncertainty for seller in Uncertainty for seller in finding a finding a buyerbuyer (search costs) (search costs)
Transaction Characteristics Uncertainty
for buyer quality
Uncertainty for buyer:
supply reliability (timeliness
and quantity)
Uncertainty for buyer and seller:
price
Uncertainty for seller: finding a
buyer
Product Characteristics, e.g.
Perishability Product Differentiation
Quality variable and visible
Quality variable and invisible
New product characteristics important to consumers
possibly
Regulatory Drivers, e.g. Liability Traceability
Border measures
Border EffectsBorder Effects
Regulatory drivers can affect transaction Regulatory drivers can affect transaction characteristics directly, characteristics directly,
e.g. increased border security measures e.g. increased border security measures following 9/11following 9/11
Border delays increase Border delays increase uncertaintyuncertainty - over timeliness of delivery; - over timeliness of delivery; - over (net) price (higher transportation - over (net) price (higher transportation costs); costs); - over quality (perishable goods)- over quality (perishable goods)
Crossing a border can significantly increase Crossing a border can significantly increase the the complexitycomplexity of the transaction of the transaction
Transaction Characteristics
Uncertainty for buyer
quality
Uncertainty for buyer:
supply reliability (timeliness
and quantity)
Uncertainty for buyer and seller:
price
Uncertainty for seller: finding a
buyer
Frequency of
Transaction
Relationship-specific
investment
Complexity of
transaction (variety of outcomes)
Regulatory Drivers, e.g. Liability
possibly
Traceability
Border measures Source: Adapted from Hobbs and Young (2000)
External Drivers: e.g.
Socio-EconomicRegulatoryTechnology
Product Characteristics
Transaction Characteristics
VerticalCoordination
Transaction Cost Reducing Competitive Pressure
Institutional AdaptationTransacti
on Costs
Adapted from Hobbs and Young (2000)
Conceptual model of forces driving
vertical coordination
External Drivers: e.g.
Socio-EconomicRegulatoryTechnology
Product Characteristics
Transaction Characteristics
VerticalCoordination
Transaction Cost Reducing Competitive Pressure
Institutional AdaptationTransacti
on Costs
Adapted from Hobbs and Young (2000)
Conceptual model of forces driving
vertical coordination
Institutional AdaptationInstitutional Adaptation Institutional adaptation Institutional adaptation
through transaction-cost through transaction-cost reducing innovationsreducing innovations
e.g. private sector: third e.g. private sector: third party service providersparty service providers
e.g. public sector e.g. public sector institutional adaptations: institutional adaptations: GreenLane Maritime GreenLane Maritime Cargo Security ActCargo Security Act
The good newsThe good news NAFTA chapter 11 facilitated more secure NAFTA chapter 11 facilitated more secure
cross-border investments, cross-border investments, e.g. Walmart - expansion into Mexico;e.g. Walmart - expansion into Mexico; Cargill (greenfield investment in Alberta; Cargill (greenfield investment in Alberta; Tysons (purchase of plant in Brooks, Alberta)Tysons (purchase of plant in Brooks, Alberta)
Removal of tariffs likely more important for Removal of tariffs likely more important for increasing transborder trade rather than increasing transborder trade rather than deepening economic relations through closer deepening economic relations through closer vertical coordination (not affect product vertical coordination (not affect product characteristics or transaction characteristics)characteristics or transaction characteristics)
Removal of quantitative restrictions may have Removal of quantitative restrictions may have reduced reduced somesome supply chain uncertainties re: supply chain uncertainties re: access to quota allotmentsaccess to quota allotments
The bad newsThe bad news
Challenges to the growth of cross-Challenges to the growth of cross-border supply chains include:border supply chains include:
Policy distortions, e.g. supply Policy distortions, e.g. supply management, sugar, Canadian management, sugar, Canadian Wheat Board, subsidiesWheat Board, subsidies
Border frictionsBorder frictions Persistence of national policy Persistence of national policy
solutions to regional problemssolutions to regional problems
Border FrictionsBorder Frictions Border delays reduce the efficiency gains Border delays reduce the efficiency gains
available from just-in-time delivery systemsavailable from just-in-time delivery systems Customs procedures and border inspection Customs procedures and border inspection
costscosts Lack of harmonization of standards & Lack of harmonization of standards &
technical regulationstechnical regulations International law opaque with respect to International law opaque with respect to
transboundary liabilitytransboundary liability Exchange rate risk Exchange rate risk People movementPeople movement
Crossing a border within Crossing a border within Europe (Schengen Group)Europe (Schengen Group)
“It’s lunch time . . . this must be Belgium” W.A. Kerr (numerous)
A typical Schengen Border Crossing
From border post . . . to coffee shop
US border US border
Border DelaysBorder Delays
““Often Often it takes from two to five daysit takes from two to five days and at least three pieces of equipment and at least three pieces of equipment (trucks and trailers) and three or four (trucks and trailers) and three or four drivers, to cross the Rio Grande river drivers, to cross the Rio Grande river with a loaded truck, while actual with a loaded truck, while actual driving time from Chicago to Laredo driving time from Chicago to Laredo (1600 miles) is only two days” (1600 miles) is only two days” (Haralambides and Londono-Kent, (Haralambides and Londono-Kent, 2004, Intl. J of Transport Economics, 2004, Intl. J of Transport Economics, emphasis addedemphasis added))
Border delaysBorder delays
““Transport of a trailer over the 1600 miles Transport of a trailer over the 1600 miles from Chicago to Monterrey involves 10 from Chicago to Monterrey involves 10 movements with a minium of three different movements with a minium of three different trucks and various pieces of equipment for trucks and various pieces of equipment for loading and unloading “. . . pre-clearance at loading and unloading “. . . pre-clearance at the US border is “the US border is “a process that takes 12 a process that takes 12 to 74 hoursto 74 hours”. Following pre-clearance, a ”. Following pre-clearance, a Mexican truck transfers the product across Mexican truck transfers the product across the border “the border “crossing time varies 1 to 8 crossing time varies 1 to 8 hourshours” (Haralambides and Londono-Kent, ” (Haralambides and Londono-Kent, 2004, 2004, emphasis addedemphasis added))
Border DelaysBorder Delays
““it takes from two to five days it takes from two to five days … a process that takes 12 to 74 hours … a process that takes 12 to 74 hours . . . Crossing time varies 1 to 8 hours” . . . Crossing time varies 1 to 8 hours” uncertaintyuncertainty
Estimated time northbound Mexico to US Estimated time northbound Mexico to US across Nuevo-Laredo border varies from across Nuevo-Laredo border varies from 1.6 to 13.11.6 to 13.1 hours; hours;Southbound US to Mexico varies from Southbound US to Mexico varies from 12.1 12.1 to 82.4to 82.4 hours (Haralambides & Londono- hours (Haralambides & Londono-Kent, 2004) Kent, 2004)
ImplicationsImplications
Problem for perishable productsProblem for perishable products Problem for just-in-time delivery systemsProblem for just-in-time delivery systems Uncertainty: reliability of supply; qualityUncertainty: reliability of supply; quality Suppliers may be restricted to Suppliers may be restricted to
participating in less efficient supply participating in less efficient supply chain relationshipschain relationships
Retailers will prefer to source Retailers will prefer to source domestically rather than across the domestically rather than across the border (e.g. Walmart in Mexico)border (e.g. Walmart in Mexico)
“It’s lunch time . . . this must be Belgium”
Compared to . . . Compared to . . .
Customs Procedures & Customs Procedures & Border Inspection CostsBorder Inspection Costs
Particular challenge for B-to-C Particular challenge for B-to-C Ecommerce in perishable and specialty Ecommerce in perishable and specialty food productsfood products
Lumpiness in border inspection costs put Lumpiness in border inspection costs put smaller-scale Ecommerce shipments at a smaller-scale Ecommerce shipments at a competitive disadvantagecompetitive disadvantage
Incentive instead to vertically integrate Incentive instead to vertically integrate across border and ship in bulk for across border and ship in bulk for distribution within target countrydistribution within target country
Failure to harmonize Failure to harmonize standardsstandards
E.g. different organic standards (definition, E.g. different organic standards (definition, protocols, labeling requirements); different protocols, labeling requirements); different regulations on natural health productsregulations on natural health products
Transborder movement of organic products Transborder movement of organic products may require closer vertical coordination to may require closer vertical coordination to reduce monitoring costsreduce monitoring costs
NAFTA committees on harmonization of NAFTA committees on harmonization of technical regulations and standards not technical regulations and standards not delivereddelivered
Implication: increased transaction costs Implication: increased transaction costs leading to institutional adaptation, e.g. leading to institutional adaptation, e.g. growth of private standards such as growth of private standards such as retailers’ Good Agricultural Practicesretailers’ Good Agricultural Practices
Different commercial legal Different commercial legal systemssystems
Growing emphasis on traceability, in Growing emphasis on traceability, in part to facilitate assigning liability for part to facilitate assigning liability for food safety problems & encourage due food safety problems & encourage due diligencediligence
Transboundary liability is unclearTransboundary liability is unclear Complicates cross border supply chain Complicates cross border supply chain
relationships between independent firmsrelationships between independent firms Implication: increases the complexity of Implication: increases the complexity of
the transaction, increases uncertaintythe transaction, increases uncertainty
Exchange rate risk – North Exchange rate risk – North AmericaAmerica
Creates price uncertainty for buyers & Creates price uncertainty for buyers & sellerssellers Hedge E/R risk but major structural Hedge E/R risk but major structural shifts a problemshifts a problem Vertical integration across the border a Vertical integration across the border a possible strategy to internalize the price possible strategy to internalize the price riskrisk
Europe (13 countries)Europe (13 countries)
(now much easier to go to Belgium for lunch!)
People MovementPeople Movement
Establishing business relationships likely Establishing business relationships likely requires frequent cross-border movement of requires frequent cross-border movement of personnel (search & negotiation costs)personnel (search & negotiation costs)
Ongoing business relationships likely require Ongoing business relationships likely require movement of technical personnel, etc.movement of technical personnel, etc.
Some NAFTA provisions for some Some NAFTA provisions for some professions, but still requires documentation, professions, but still requires documentation, passports; often not a transparent processpassports; often not a transparent process
New passport requirement for US-Canadian New passport requirement for US-Canadian borderborder
Lunch in BelgiumLunch in Belgium
No passport required!
Increased travel
Increased travel
hassles
hassles
Compared to . . . Compared to . . .
People Movement: People Movement: Implications?Implications?
Can affect ways in which cross-Can affect ways in which cross-border supply chains are border supply chains are coordinatedcoordinated
E.g. use subsidiaries to coordinate E.g. use subsidiaries to coordinate after-sales service. Difficult in after-sales service. Difficult in market entry stage.market entry stage.
E.g. contract with foreign firms for E.g. contract with foreign firms for after-sales serviceafter-sales service
Supply chain solutionsSupply chain solutions Joint venture with existing firms as a market Joint venture with existing firms as a market
entry strategy (e.g. Walmart’s initial foray entry strategy (e.g. Walmart’s initial foray into Mexico through JV with Cifra), ORinto Mexico through JV with Cifra), OR
Internalize costs by vertically integrating Internalize costs by vertically integrating across the border, ORacross the border, OR
Use spot markets and hire the service Use spot markets and hire the service providerprovider
Whether border frictions lead to closer OR Whether border frictions lead to closer OR looser coordination will depend on looser coordination will depend on transaction and product characteristics and transaction and product characteristics and the effect on transaction costs at the margin the effect on transaction costs at the margin
Supply chain solutionsSupply chain solutions
Institutional adaptation: growth of Institutional adaptation: growth of firms providing services which reduce firms providing services which reduce the transaction costs of moving goods the transaction costs of moving goods across borders. May reduce the effect across borders. May reduce the effect of borders on supply chainsof borders on supply chains
Difficult to test empirically. Need time Difficult to test empirically. Need time series data on degree & nature of cross series data on degree & nature of cross border commerce and growth/decline border commerce and growth/decline of third party service providersof third party service providers
National Policy Responses National Policy Responses to Regional Problemsto Regional Problems
National policy decisions can increase risks of cross-National policy decisions can increase risks of cross-border supply chain investmentsborder supply chain investments
E.g. increased border security measures following 9/11 E.g. increased border security measures following 9/11 E.g. Effect of BSE on cross-border supply chains: E.g. Effect of BSE on cross-border supply chains:
closure of US border to Canadian cattle for an closure of US border to Canadian cattle for an extended periodextended period
E.g. anti-dumping & countervail actionsE.g. anti-dumping & countervail actions E.g. Threat of country of origin labelling E.g. Threat of country of origin labelling create uncertainty; add to complexity of the create uncertainty; add to complexity of the
transactiontransaction disrupt cross-border supply chains and increase disrupt cross-border supply chains and increase
costs/risks of investments in these supply chainscosts/risks of investments in these supply chains Difficult to anticipate ex anteDifficult to anticipate ex ante
The Canadian-US border The Canadian-US border on 9/12on 9/12
ConclusionsConclusions NAFTA borders still matterNAFTA borders still matter Full potential for Full potential for deepeningdeepening economic integration economic integration
remains unrealizedremains unrealized Bilateral supply chains in North America more costly Bilateral supply chains in North America more costly
than those within one countrythan those within one country Difficult to predict how this inefficiency will manifest Difficult to predict how this inefficiency will manifest
itself:itself: as closer supply chain coordination to internalize as closer supply chain coordination to internalize costs, costs, or looser coordination to avoid dependency risks or looser coordination to avoid dependency risks
Need to examine product characteristics and transaction Need to examine product characteristics and transaction characteristics of specific industries to determine characteristics of specific industries to determine
Further attention needed to border frictions and common Further attention needed to border frictions and common policy approaches within NAFTA to encourage greater policy approaches within NAFTA to encourage greater cross-border supply chain activity in the agrifood sectorcross-border supply chain activity in the agrifood sector
Lunch anyone?Lunch anyone?