Agile Working Group Agile Method Critical Success Factors.
-
Upload
ashley-casey -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Agile Working Group Agile Method Critical Success Factors.
Agile Working Group
Agile Method Critical Success Factors
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 2
Working Group Goals Determine Critical Success Factors
for Implementing practices that support
the Agile philosophy Obtaining organizational, projects and
individual benefits from said practices
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 3
Participants Donald Reifer, USC-RCI (Moderator) Mohammed Al-Said, USC (Scribe) Barry Boehm, USC* Alistair Cōckburn, Humans and Technology Nancy Eickelmann, Motorola Michael Falat, DOD/DISA Bill Harenburg, Information Technology Management George Huling, Consultant Tony Jordano, SAIC Charles Leinbach, Freshwater Partners Michael Salone, US Army* Walker Royce, Rational
* Roaming
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 4
Agenda Understand working group scope What is Agile? Questions and worries related to
Agile Critical Success Factors Research opportunities Validation
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 5
The Agile Manifesto - Value on Maneuverability
1. Individuals and Interactions over Processes and Tools
2. Working software over Comprehensive documentation
3. Customer collaboration over Contract negotiation
4. Responding to change over Following a plan
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 6
Questions and Worries How do we explain what agile methods
are, so potential adopters truly understand them?
Worry – People will honestly fake it and continue to do business as usual.
Worry – A loss of accountability Worry – Agility during development
damages maintainability
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 7
Questions and Worries (2) Mapping between business model and
methodology to evaluate the appropriateness
How do we unify the industry and reduce polarization
Domain of applicability? Adopters will misinterpret the philosophy
which will lead to practices that don’t achieve desired objectives.
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 8
Questions and Worries (3) Can we invent ways to be maneuverable
in both long – and short-term? Worry - Agile methods will fall out of
favor. Worry – Lack of body of knowledge that
supports agile methods. Worry - Hackers like to claim to be agile
to avoid applying discipline.
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 9
Questions and Worries (4) Worry – Agile is not maneuver (in
specific business models). Can I use it and get some benefit
from it?
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 10
Critical Success Factors Using PPP&T People
Right people with the right skills available when needed
Teamwork Leadership
Process Disciplined process
Product Stable requirements
and architecture Building codes CM QA Interface management
Technology
Didn’t work, we couldn’t findCSFs that are truly unique to Agile
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 11
The Agile Manifesto - Value on Maneuverability
1. Individuals and Interactions over Processes and Tools
2. Working software over Comprehensive documentation
3. Customer collaboration over Contract negotiation
4. Responding to change over Following a plan
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 12
CSFs: Individuals and Interations Over Processes and Tools
Reward demonstrable results Encourage trying new ideas as appropriate
Project individuals and interactions are guided by supportive processes and practices Number of practices used is way smaller than
traditional sets All stakeholders buy-in
People are disciplined by a few key practices (anchors)
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 13
CSFs: Working Software over Comprehensive Documentation
Frequent demos of product software as it evolves More frequent than documents Demos in place of reviews. Doesn’t mean “no” documentation. Documentation focused on users and
structure, not design.
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 14
CSFs: Customer Collaboration Over Contract Negotiations
Customers/users are full-time team participants Open communications Adds value Trusting cultured
Incremental contracting based on incremental results “what” vs. “how”
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 15
CSFs: Responding to Change Over Following a Plan
Frequently evolve and reprioritize requirements (stories)
Open to replanning project when and as needed don’t overplan appropriate level of detail
Start the project with the mindset that you’ll be responsive to responsible change
Responsible means balanced consideration between value, solution and resources
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 16
Research Topics1. How much documentation and what kind is enough?
What downstream documentation is useful?2. What agile practices are being used, when and within
what domains and how successful are they?3. How do we do agile in an acquisition environment?
Contracting, progress measurement, RFP,/SOW, progress monitoring, oversight, V&V, milestone payment
4. How do you do tech transfer with rogue programmers?5. As compared to “traditional” projects, do agile projects:
Increase quality Improve productivity Meet performance expectations Cut costs
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 17
Research Topics (2)6. What are the next set of emerging agile best practices?
Items 14, 15, …
7. What is the core set of practices amongst the agile practices?
8. The role of metrics in agile and how can they reenforce maneuverability
New and existing metrics
9. What’s different about managing an agile project vs. a traditional project?
10. How does agile fit in with different business models? (web, military, etc.)
March 13, 2002 USC-CSE Annual Research Review - Working Group on CSFs for Agile Methods 18
Thanks to all the participants
Questions?