Aggrecan catabolism during mesenchymal stromal cell in vitro ...
-
Upload
luis-alejandro -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Aggrecan catabolism during mesenchymal stromal cell in vitro ...
Aggrecan catabolism during mesenchymal stromal cell in vitro chondrogenesis
Marıa Lucıa Gutierreza*, Johana Marıa Guevaraa, Olga Yaneth Echeverria, Diego Garzon-Alvaradob and
Luis Alejandro Barreraa
aInstitute for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, K 7 No. 43�82 Lab 305A Edificio JesusEmilio Ramirez, Bogota, Colombia; bBiomimetics Laboratory, Biotechnology Institute, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, K 30No. 45�03 Edificio 407 Oficina 203, Bogota, Colombia
(Received 5 April 2013; accepted 4 June 2013)
During skeleton formation, mesenchymal cells condense and differentiate into chondrocytes in a process known aschondrogenesis. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), main components of aggrecan in the extracellular matrix (ECM),have an important role in this process. An in vitro simplified system has been devised to study chondrogenesis usingmesenchymal progenitor cells. Although the capacity of mesenchymal stromal cells to differentiate into thechondrogenic lineage is well established, there is a lack of knowledge with respect to lysosomal enzyme activityduring the chondrogenic process. To further understand GAG’s catabolic activities during in vitro chondrogenesis, weevaluated three lysosomal enzymes. Chondrogenic differentiation was demonstrated by Alcian blue positive stainquantified by a grading system using ImageJ. Enzyme activity for N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate-sulfatase duringchondrogenic induction decreased significantly with time of culture; b-galactosidase enzyme activity had a similartendency of temporal activity. On the contrary, b-glucuronidase enzyme activity decreased from the first to secondweek of induction, but remained the same during the third week of culture. Aggrecan’s immunohistochemistry valuesfor aggregates under chondrogenic induction revealed a similar temporal pattern to that of N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate-sulfatase and b-galactosidase enzyme activity. This work has contributed to the evaluation of enzymeactivities associated with GAG degradation, critical component of cartilage ECM. These findings are relevant inunderstanding the role of enzymes responsible for degradation of molecules predominantly synthesized inthe chondrogenic differentiation process. A better understanding of the roles of these enzymes during developmentcould help elucidate further association of deficiencies of these enzymes in skeletal pathologies, primarilychondrodysplasias.
Keywords: glycosaminoglycans; mesenchymal stromal cells; chondrogenic differentiation; lysosomal enzymes
1. Introduction
During embryological skeleton development chondro-
cytes derive from mesenchymal cells that migrate to
specific sites and differentiate into chondrocytes in a
process known as chondrogenesis. Chondrocytes in-
habit a hyperosmotic and acidic environment resulting
from a polyanionic extracellular matrix (ECM), prin-
cipally composed of collagen type II and glycosami-
noglycans (GAGs) (Goldring et al. 2006; Han et al.
2011). Chondrocytes synthesize their surroundings,
and their effectiveness as homeostatic regulators par-
tially depends on their capability to synthesize and
catabolize ECM components. Any alteration in this
balance is associated with diseased cartilage. Although
cartilage GAG synthesis has been described (DeLise et
al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2003; Goldring et al. 2006;
Gotting et al. 2007; Cameron et al. 2009; Ghone &
Grayson 2012), little is known about GAG catabolism
during chondrogenesis (Settembre et al. 2008; Ratzka
et al. 2010). The purpose of this study was to evaluate
the pattern of specific lysosome enzyme activities,
during in vitro chondrogenesis, to shed light on their
biological significance.
Embryonic appendicular skeleton formation is
achieved through chondrogenesis. These mechanisms
are delicately controlled in space and time by cellular
interactions, growth and differentiation factors, and
other environmental elements (Sandell & Adler 1999;
Sekiya et al. 2002; Kronenberg 2003). During skeleton
formation, mesenchymal cells condense and differenti-
ate into chondrocytes forming a cartilage mold of
future bones. Bone results as the replacement of the
cartilaginous intermediate by endochondral ossifica-
tion (Kronenberg 2003). Throughout chondrogenesis,
the ECM plays a pivotal role in morphogenesis and
development. Growth factor availability is controlled
by the ECM resulting in regulation of cell differentia-
tion, proliferation, adhesion, and migration (DeLise
et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2006). The chondrogenic mold is
characterized by the synthesis of collagen type II and
aggrecan, proteoglycans (PGs) composed of a core
protein and the GAGs keratan sulfate (KS) and
chondroitin sulfate (CS) linked in a perpendicular
manner (Gotting et al. 2007; Lamoureux et al. 2007).
However, within the cartilage matrix other sulfated
GAGs such as heparan sulfate (HS), dermatan sulfate
(DS), and nonsulfated hyaluronan also function as
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
DEVELOPMENTAL
BIO
LOGY
Animal Cells and Systems, 2013
Vol. 17, No. 4, 243�249, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2013.812537
# 2013 Korean Society for Integrative Biology
stabilizers, cofactors, and/or corepressors for growth
factors, cytokines, and chemokines (DeLise et al. 2000).
Approaches to understand chondrogenesis have
used mice and chick organ cultures of embryonic limbs
(Sekiya et al. 2002; Goldring et al. 2006). In the mouse
embryo, global transcriptome analysis has identified
cartilage formation to occur at embryonic days 11.5
(precondensation of mesenchymal cells), 12.5 (conden-sation), and 13.5 (differentiation) (Cameron et al.
2009). Due to the complexity of embryonic chondro-
genesis, for over a decade, a simplified in vitro approach
has been used to study mesenchymal stromal cell
(MSC) chondrogenic differentiation. In vitro aggregate
culture technique allows direct study of the chondro-
genic differentiation process. It duplicates cellular
condensation and induces differentiation by culturingcells in conditioned media (Yoo et al. 1998). MSCs are
multipotent progenitors of connective tissue, with the
potential to differentiate in vitro and in vivo into
mesodermal lineages: adipo-, osteo-, and chondrogenic
(Baksh et al. 2004). They have been isolated from many
tissues,and subcutaneous adipose tissue is an attractive
source with known chondrogenic differentiation poten-
tial (Erickson et al. 2002; Zuk et al. 2002).Although the capacity of MSC to differentiate into the
chondrogenic lineage is well established, there is a lack
of knowledge with respect to GAG catabolism during
chondrogenesis. To further understand the enzyme activ-
ity responsible for GAG degradation, we evaluated three
lysosomal enzymes using aggregate culture technique with
human adipose-derived MSCs undergoing chondrogenic
differentiation. We characterized the enzymatic activity ofN-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate-sulfatase (GALNS), b-
galactosidase, and b-glucuronidase during three-week
aggregate culture. GALNS catalyzes the hydrolysis of
sulfate ester bonds in chondroitin-6-sulfate (C6S), and
galactose-6-sulfate in KS (Bielicki et al. 1995). b-
Galactosidase carries out the subsequent degradation of
KS (Ohto et al. 2012), and hydrolysis of the terminal
nonreducing b-D-glucuronide in HS, DS, and CS iscarried out by b-glucuronidase (Neufeld & Muenzer
2001; Rowan et al. 2012). The purpose of this study was
to evaluate GAG catabolism during in vitro chondro-
genesis to understand possible temporal changes in
enzyme activity during MSC in vitro chondrogenesis of
specific lysosome enzymes, and to better define the
importance of GAG catabolism during chondrogenesis.
2. Methods
We hypothesized that enzyme activity should have a
temporal pattern of activity during in vitro chondro-
genesis, likely to be associated to the substrate catabo-
lised. To verify this hypothesis, first we isolated MSCsform adipose tissue and characterized them according
to the minimal criteria established by the ISCT
(Dominici et al. 2006).
2.1. MSC isolation and characterization
Samples were obtained after informed signed consent
from three females (aged from 24 to 38) undergoingcosmetic surgery with the approval of the Bioethics
Committee at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Adipose tissue MSCs were isolated as previously
described with slight modifications (Zuk et al. 2001).
Briefly, samples were washed and digested with collage-
nase type I. A stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was
obtained and resuspended in a-minimum essential
media (MEM) without ribonucleosides or ribonucleo-tides (Sigma�Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with 10%
FBS, antibiotics, and antimycotic (complete media), and
seeded in 100-mm tissue culture. Tissue culture plates
were incubated at 378C with 5% CO2 and humidified
atmosphere. Media were changed 24 h after plating.
MSCs from donors were cultured in complete media
below passage seven. Cells were immunophenotyped
and characterized as previously described (Gutierrez etal. 2012). For aggregate culture of 250�103 cells
passage, two were placed in a polypropylene tube and
centrifuged to form a pellet. Twenty-four hours after
centrifugation induction was initiated. The cells were
cultured in complete media or chondrogenic differen-
tiation media (Lonza, Walkerville, MD) supplemented
with BMP-6 (Sigma) and TGF-b3 (Invitrogen) at 10 ng/
ml, respectively. Media was changed twice a week for21 days. Chondrogenesis was confirmed by Alcian blue
positive stain percentage evaluated by ImageJ analysis,
as previously described (Gutierrez et al. 2012).
To determine possible temporal changes in enzyme
activity during MSC aggregate culture, cells were
maintained for three weeks in either complete media
or chondrogenic differentiation media to determine
their pattern of enzyme activity.
2.2. Biochemical analyses
For intracellular GALNS, b-galactosidase and b-glucur-
onidase enzyme activity aggregates were sonicated in
300-ml (155 mM) saline solution for 20 seconds in three
cycles on ice. GALNS enzyme activity was measuredusing the fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-
b-galactopyranoside-6-sulfate (TRC, Canada), as des-
cribed by van Diggelen with modifications (van Diggelen
et al. 1990). For b-galactosidase and b-glucuronidase
enzyme activity, the fluorogenic substrates 4-methylum-
belliferyl-b-D-galactoside and 4-methylumbelliferyl-b-D-
glucuronide (both form Sigma) were used, respectively.
Activity was determined according to Shapira et al. (1989).GALNS specific activity in aggregate culture was calcu-
244 M.L. Gutierrez et al.
lated by normalizing volumetric activity (nmol/h/ml) to
GALNS quantity determined by indirect enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (ng/ml). Indirect ELISA
was performed from aggregate lysates as reported by
Rodriguez et al. (2010). GALNS antibody was kindly
provided by Dr. Shunji Tomatsu (Skeletal Dysplasia Lab
Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont
Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA).To verify aggrecan’s synthesis during aggregate
culture, IHC was carried out during the three-week
culture.
2.3. Aggrecan IHC values
As previously described, aggrecan’s IHC values were
obtained using a semiautomatic grading system to
evaluate in vitro chondrogenesis (Gutierrez et al. 2012).
2.4. Statistical analysis
Results are presented as mean9standard error (n�3
with replicates per sample), and analyzed using Stu-
dent’s t-test to compare MSCs cultured in complete
media vs. cells cultured in chondrogenic differentiationmedia. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to
compare differences among groups. Differences were
considered significant at pB0.05. The SPSS for
Windows (IBM version 18) and Statistix (Analytical
software version 9.0) were used for statistical analysis.
3. Results
3.1. MSC characterization
Mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from processed
lipoaspirate (PLA) complied with all criteria to identify
them as MSCs according to the International Society
for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) (Dominici et al. 2006), aspreviously described (Gutierrez et al. 2012).
3.2. Aggregate culture phenotype
To determine chondrogenic differentiation, Alcian blue
positive stain percentage carried out by ImageJ analysis
revealed a significantly higher percentage in aggregate
cultures in chondrogenic differentiation media com-
pared to complete media. In addition, we observed a
decreasing trend over time for Alcian blue stain in
aggregates cultured in chondrogenic differentiation
media (Table 1).
3.3. Aggrecan immunohistochemistry (IHC) values
We observed a decreasing tendency with time foraggrecan’s marker assessment percentage for aggregates
cultured in chondrogenic differentiation media. On the
contrary, aggregates cultured in complete media had an
increased percentage with increasing time of culture
(Table 2), as previously determined by ImageJ analysis
(Gutierrez et al. 2012).
3.4. Lysosome enzyme activity
GALNS volumetric enzyme activity (nmol/h/ml) sig-
nificantly decreased in a temporal manner during
chondrogenic induction, with highest activity at early
events of chondrogenic differentiation. GALNS en-
zyme activity was significantly different for spheres
cultured in complete media vs. spheres cultured in
chondrogenic differentiation media (Figure 1).
GALNS specific activity was determined by normal-
izing GALNS volumetric activity (nmol/h/ml) to
GALNS determined by indirect ELISA (ng/ml). Specific
activity demonstrated a significant decrease of GALNS
Table 1. Alcian blue positive stain percentage obtained by
using ImageJ analysis.
Complete
media
Significance
levels for
CM vs.
CDM
Chondrogenic
differentiation
media
Significance
levels for
CDM
between
weeks
Week 1 2.7690.67 *** 19.5091.15 ***
Week 2 1.3690.33 *** 16.2591.09 ***
Week 3 3.7690.40 ** 8.7791.13 ***
Cells cultured in aggregates in complete media or chondrogenicdifferentiation media during the first, second and third week ofculture. Percentage was determined as previously described(Gutierrez et al. 2012).One way ANOVA **pB0.01 (CMW3 vs. CDMW3).***pB0.001 (CMW1 vs. CDM WK1, CMW2 vs. CDM W2.CDMW1 vs. CDMW3. CDMW2 vs. CDMW3).CM, complete media; CDM, chondrogenic differentiation media;WK, week.
Table 2. Aggrecan’s marker assessment determined by ImageJ
analysis.
Complete
media
Significance
levels for CM
between weeks
Chondrogenic
differentiation
media
Week 1 0.2090.05 * 0.6990.55
Week 2 0.3490.12 0.5290.16
Week 3 1.1990.28 * 0.2790.06
Cells cultured in aggregates in complete media or chondrogenicdifferentiation media for 7 (Week 1), 14 (Week 2), or 21 days (Week 3).Aggrecan marker assessment percentage was significantly higher foraggregates in complete media during the third week of culturecompared to the first week (One way ANOVA *pB0.05 WK1 vs.WK3).WK, week.
Animal Cells and Systems 245
(nmol/h/ng) with time for aggregates undergoing chon-
drogenic differentiation (Figure 2).
Analysis of b-galactosidase volumetric enzyme
activity in aggregates cultured in chondrogenic
differentiation media was significantly higher com-
pared to spheres cultured in complete media for the
first and second week of culture. For spheres cultured
in chondrogenic media, enzyme activity had a pattern
with a decreasing tendency, resembling that of GALNS,
during the three weeks of culture (Figure 3A).
b-Glucuronidase activity, a lysosomal enzyme
which catabolizes DS, HS, and CS, had a more uniform
enzyme activity for cells under chondrogenic induction
during the three weeks of culture compared to enzymes
responsible for initiation of KS and C6S catabolism.
For aggregates cultured in complete media, enzyme
Figure 3. (A) Beta galactosidase volumetric enzyme activity.
Activity was calculated in aggregates cultured for three weeks
in complete (white bars) and chondrogenic media (black
bars). Enzyme activity for spheres in complete media was
significantly lower compared to spheres in chondrogenic
differentiation media (Student’s t-test *pB0.05, ***pB
0.001) for the first and second week of culture. (B) Beta
glucuronidase volumetric enzyme activity. Activity was
calculated in aggregates cultured for three weeks in complete
and chondrogenic differentiation media. Enzyme activity for
spheres in complete media (white bars) was significantly
lower compared to spheres in chondrogenic differentiation
media (black bars) for the second and third week of culture
(Student’s t-test *** pB0.001).
Figure 1. GALNS enzyme activity. Volumetric GALNS
activity (nmol/h/ml) was calculated in aggregates cultured
for one, two, or three weeks in complete (white bars) or
chondrogenic differentiation media (black bars). Enzyme
activity was significantly different for spheres in complete
media vs. chondrogenic differentiation media (Student’s t-test
**pB0.005). Enzyme activity from spheres in chondrogenic
differentiation media cultured for one week was significantly
higher compared to spheres cultured for two or three weeks.
In addition, aggregates under chondrogenic induction during
the second week of culture had a higher activity compared to
aggregates during the third week of culture (ANOVA *pB0.05,
***pB0.001).
Figure 2. GALNS specific activity (nmol/h/ng). Enzyme
activity was calculated from aggregates cultured for 7, 14,
or 21 days in complete media (white bars) or chondrogenic
differentiation media (black bars). Specific activity was
significantly higher for aggregates cultured in chondrogenic
differentiation media during the first week of culture com-
pared to the third week (ANOVA *pB0.05). Significant
differences were also observed between aggregates in com-
plete compared to those cultured in chondrogenic differentia-
tion media during the first and second week of culture
(Student’s t-test *pB0.05).
246 M.L. Gutierrez et al.
activity was comparable to b-galactosidase during the
three weeks of culture. Complete media aggregates
had a significantly lower enzyme activity compared
to aggregates in chondrogenic differentiation media
during the second and third week of culture (Figure
3B). In summary, b-glucuronidase enzyme activity
during chondrogenic induction did not seem to have
a temporal decrease during the three weeks of culture.Collectively, our results in general demonstrate
greater enzyme activities in aggregates cultured in
chondrogenic media compared to complete media. In
chondrogenic differentiation media, the pattern of
catabolic activity for GALNS and b-galactosidase,
enzymes involved in KS and C6S catabolism during
the three weeks of culture, was a gradual decrease from
the first to third week of culture. It is noteworthy thatGALNS specific enzyme activity was significantly
higher during the first week of culture in chondrogenic
differentiation media compared to the third week of
aggregate culture. On the contrary, enzyme activity for
b-glucuronidase was more uniform during the three-
week culture. In addition, based on the scores obtained
from a semiquantitative IHC grading analysis using
ImageJ, aggrecan’s marker assessment percentage wasgreater during the early events of chondrogenic differ-
entiation with a gradual decrease with time.
4. Discussion
Cartilage ensued from mesenchymal differentiationcontains large amounts of GAGs in the ECM, and
their proper catabolism provides tissue homeostasis. A
broad spectrum of skeletal abnormalities has been
identified as a result of deficient enzymes unable to
catabolise GAGs adequately, therefore underlying their
biological importance (Settembre et al. 2008). The aim
of this study was to define possible temporal enzyme
activity patterns for three lysosomal enzymes: GALNS,b-galactosidase, and b-glucuronidase in a well-estab-
lished model for in vitro chondrogenesis (Yoo et al.
1998).
Chondrogenesis was promoted by known chondro-
genic inducers (Bohme et al. 1992; Estes et al. 2006;
Rich et al. 2008), and differentiation was confirmed by
Alcian blue positive stain percentage. Spheroids cultured
for three weeks in chondrogenic differentiation mediahad a significant higher percentage compared to aggre-
gates in complete media. Thus, confirming that inducers
had an effect on total GAG synthesis during aggregate
culture suggests cells in chondrogenic differentiation
media were undergoing differentiation.
We set out to assay activities for three lysosomal
enzymes responsible for GAG degradation during in
vitro chondrogenesis: GALNS, b-galactosidase, andb-glucuronidase. Deficiencies in these enzymes result
in skeletal abnormalities with shortened long bones
through mechanisms largely unknown in patients with
Morquio A (Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA), Morquio B
(Mucopolysaccharidosis IVB), and Sly disease
(Mucopolysaccharidosis VII), respectively. These dis-
orders are called mucopolysaccharidoses, since GAGs
were previously named as mucopolysaccharides. Defi-
ciency of the previously mentioned lysosomal enzymes
interrupts GAG degradation and results in intralyso-
somal GAG accumulation (Neufeld & Muenzer 2001).Changes in lysosomal enzyme activities responsible
for GAG degradation related to the process of
chondrogenesis either in vivo or in vitro have not been
reported. A study by Ratzka et al. described expression
patterns of sulfatase genes in the developing mouse
embryo. From their work, a total of six sulfatases
were found in the developing skeleton: arylsulfatase
B (ArsB), ArsI, ArsJ, glucosamine-6-sulfatase, Sulf1,
and Sulf2. Nonetheless, Galns, b-galactosidase, or
b-glucuronidase was not described by them. For Galns
it was reported that it was ubiquitously expressed in
tissues on days 12.5 and 14.5 of embryological devel-
opment, not on day 13.5, when differentiation takes
place (Ratzka et al. 2010). Furthermore, a global
comparative transcriptome analysis of cartilage forma-
tion, in vivo, did not describe the role of enzymes
associated with aggrecan’s catabolism, a predominant
cartilage matrix component (Cameron et al. 2009). This
association is relevant, since a defect in any one of
these three enzymes is manifested as a skeletal disease
(Neufeld & Muenzer 2001). For example, chondrocytesfrom Morquio A patients have phenotypic changes as a
consequence of undegraded KS manifested in terms
of altered gene expression resulting in a chondrodys-
plasia (Dvorak-Ewell et al. 2010). Furthermore, De
Franceschi and colleagues described decreased aggre-
can mRNA in samples obtained from femoral condyle
of the knee in two severe Morquio A patients (De
Franceschi et al. 2007).
Aggrecan is composed of a small KS domain and a
larger CS domain (Rodriguez et al. 2006), and makespart of the avascular ECM synthesized during chon-
drocyte differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells
(Blair et al. 2002). GALNS catalyzes the first step of
intralysosomal KS or C6S catabolism (Pshezhetsky &
Potier 1996; Tomatsu et al. 2011). The following step in
KS’ degradation is carried out by b-galactosidase
(Neufeld & Muenzer 2001; Ohto et al. 2012). Human
adipose MSC chondrogenic differentiation studies have
revealed that aggrecan’s expression is restricted to early
events, as early as the first week of induction, with a
decrease after the second week of differentiation(Erickson et al. 2002; Zuk et al. 2002; Estes et al.
2006). Most chondrogenesis studies have focused on
aggrecan’s synthesis, which is the characteristic of
Animal Cells and Systems 247
mesenchymal cell differentiation into chondrocytes and
proliferation. On chondrocytes that have fully differ-
entiated, its synthesis stops (Goldring et al. 2006). It is
possible that GALNS and b-galactosidase activities are
highest when aggrecan synthesis initiates, and decline
concomitantly as aggrecan is not synthesized again.
From our results, we observed during the course of
three-week culture a gradual decrease in GALNS and b-
galactosidase enzyme activity. This similar pattern of
enzymatic activity decline might be explained by GALNS
and b-galactosidase close relationship, as they form part
of the multienzyme complex of lysosomal hydrolases and
are related to KS catabolism, main component of
aggrecan (Pshezhetsky & Potier 1996). On the other
hand, b-glucuronidase related to DS, HS, and CS
catabolism, displayed a more homogenous pattern of
enzyme activity during the three weeks of culture in
chondrogenic media (Metcalf et al. 2009).
Last, aggrecan’s IHC results revealed a gradual
decrease with time for cells undergoing chondrogenic
differentiation. The pattern of aggrecan’s marker
assessment percentage as determined by semiquan-
titative analysis is parallel to that of GALNS and
b-galactosidase enzyme activities during the three
weeks of chondrogenic induction. We suggest that
differences in the patterns of enzyme activities observed
during in vitro chondrogenesis could be associated to
the substrates degraded. Further studies to confirm this
association are needed.
In conclusion to our knowledge, this is the first
report to determine enzymatic activities associated
with ECM GAG degradation, specifically GALNS,
b-galactosidase, and b-glucuronidase using aggregate
culture technique during chondrogenic differentiation.
GALNS and b-galactosidase enzyme activities decreased
in a temporal manner during the in vitro chondrogenesis
process. These findings are relevant in understanding
the role of enzymes responsible for degradation of
molecules predominantly synthesized during the chon-
drogenic process, in particular, molecules specific to
cartilage tissues such as KS and CS. Further studies
identifying its participation during in vivo chondro-
genesis could shed some light on chondrodysplasia
therapeutic approaches.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Colciencias Grant 1203440820438.We would like to thank Dr Felipe Amaya M.D. for providinglipoaspirate samples.
References
Baksh D, Song L, Tuan RS. 2004. Adult mesenchymal stemcells: characterization, differentiation, and application incell and gene therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 8:301�316.
Bielicki J, Fuller M, Guo XH, Morris CP, Hopewood JJ,Anson DS. 1995. Expression, purification and character-ization of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulphatase. Biochem J. 311:333�339.
Blair HC, Zaidi M, Schlesinger PH. 2002. Mechanismsbalancing skeletal matrix synthesis and degradation.Biochem J. 364:329�341.
Bohme K, Conscience-Egli M, Tschan T, Winterhalter KH,Bruckner P. 1992. Induction of proliferation or hyper-trophy of chondrocytes in serum-free culture: the role ofinsulin-like growth factor-I, insulin, or thyroxine. J CellBiol. 116:1035�1042.
Cameron TL, Belluoccio D, Farlie PG, Brachvogel B, Bate-man JF. 2009. Global comparative transcriptome analysisof cartilage formation in vivo. BMC Dev Biol. 9:20.
De Franceschi L, Roseti L, Desando G, Facchini A, GrigoloB. 2007. A molecular and histological characterization ofcartilage from patients with Morquio syndrome. Osteoar-thritis Cartilage. 15:1311�1317.
DeLise AM, Fischer L, Tuan RS. 2000. Cellular interactionsand signaling in cartilage development. OsteoarthritisCartilage. 8:309�334.
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I,Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D,Horwitz E. 2006. Minimal criteria for defining multi-potent mesenchymal stromal cells. The internationalsociety for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy.8:315�317.
Dvorak-Ewell M, Wendt D, Hague C, Christianson T,Koppaka V, Crippen D, Kakkis E, Vellard M. 2010.Enzyme replacement in a human model of mucopoly-saccharidosis IVA in vitro and its biodistribution in thecartilage of wild type mice. PLoS One. 5:e12194.
Erickson GR, Gimble JM, Franklin DM, Rice HE, Awad H,Guilak F. 2002. Chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells in vitro and in vivo. BiochemBiophys Res Commun. 290:763�769.
Estes BT, Wu AW, Guilak F. 2006. Potent induction ofchondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derivedadult stem cells by bone morphogenetic protein 6.Arthritis Rheum. 54:1222�1232.
Ghone NV, Grayson WL. 2012. Recapitulation of mesench-ymal condensation enhances in vitro chondrogenesis ofhuman mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 227:3701�3708.
Goldring MB, Tsuchimochi K, Ijiri K. 2006. The control ofchondrogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 97:33�44.
Gotting C, Prante C, Kuhn J, Kleesiek K. 2007. Proteoglycanbiosynthesis during chondrogenic differentiation of me-senchymal stem cells. Scientific World J. 7:1207�1210.
Gutierrez M, Guevara J, Barrera L. 2012. Semi-automaticgrading system in histologic and immunohistochemistryanalysis to evaluate in vitro chondrogenesis. UniversitasScientiarum. 17:167�178.
Han L, Grodzinsky AJ, Ortiz C. 2011. Nanomechanics of thecartilage extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Mater Res.41:133�168.
Kronenberg HM. 2003. Developmental regulation of thegrowth plate. Nature. 423:332�336.
Lamoureux F, Baud’huin M, Duplomb L, Heymann D,Redini F. 2007. Proteoglycans: key partners in bone cellbiology. Bioessays. 29:758�771.
Lin Z, Willers C, Xu J, Zheng MH. 2006. The chondrocyte:biology and clinical application. Tissue Eng. 12:1971�1984.
248 M.L. Gutierrez et al.
Metcalf JA, Zhang Y, Hilton MJ, Long F, Ponder KP. 2009.Mechanism of shortened bones in mucopolysaccharidosisVII. Mol Genet Metab. 97:202�211.
Neufeld EF, Muenzer J. 2001. The mucopolysaccharidoses.In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors.The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease,Eighth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 3421�3452.
Ohto U, Usui K, Ochi T, Yuki K, Satow Y, Shimizu T. 2012.Crystal structure of human beta-galactosidase: structuralbasis of Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio B diseases.J Biol Chem. 287:1801�1812.
Pshezhetsky AV, Potier M. 1996. Association of N-acetylga-lactosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase with the multienzymelysosomal complex of beta-galactosidase, cathepsin A,and neuraminidase. Possible implication for intralysoso-mal catabolism of keratan sulfate. J Biol Chem.271:28359�28365.
Ratzka A, Mundlos S, Vortkamp A. 2010. Expressionpatterns of sulfatase genes in the developing mouseembryo. Dev Dyn. 239:1779�1788.
Rich JT, Rosova I, Nolta JA, Myckatyn TM, Sandell LJ,McAlinden A. 2008. Upregulation of Runx2 and Osterixduring in vitro chondrogenesis of human adipose-derivedstromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 372:230�235.
Rodriguez A, Espejo AJ, Hernandez A, Velasquez OL,Lizaraso LM, Cordoba HA, Sanchez OF, Almeciga-DiazCJ, Barrera LA. 2010. Enzyme replacement therapy forMorquio A: an active recombinant N-acetylgalactosa-mine-6-sulfate sulfatase produced in Escherichia coliBL21. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 37:1193�1201.
Rodriguez E, Roland SK, Plaas A, Roughley PJ. 2006. Theglycosaminoglycan attachment regions of human aggre-can. J Biol Chem. 281:18444�18450.
Rowan DJ, Tomatsu S, Grubb JH, Haupt B, Montano AM,Oikawa H, Sosa AC, Chen A, Sly WS. 2012. Longcirculating enzyme replacement therapy rescues bonepathology in mucopolysaccharidosis VII murine model.Mol Genet Metab. 107:161�172.
Sandell LJ, Adler P. 1999. Developmental patterns of cartilage.Front Biosci. 4:D731�D742.
Sekiya I, Vuoristo JT, Larson BL, Prockop DJ. 2002. In vitrocartilage formation by human adult stem cells from bonemarrow stroma defines the sequence of cellular andmolecular events during chondrogenesis. Proc Natl AcadSci USA. 99:4397�4402.
Settembre C, Arteaga-Solis E, McKee MD, de Pablo R, AlAwqati Q, Ballabio A, Karsenty G. 2008. Proteoglycandesulfation determines the efficiency of chondrocyteautophagy and the extent of FGF signaling duringendochondral ossification. Genes Dev. 22:2645�2650.
Shapira E, Blitzer MG, Miller JB, Affrick DK. 1989.Biochemical genetics: a laboratory manual. New York:Oxford University Press, p. 25 and 29.
Tomatsu S, Montano AM, Oikawa H, Smith M, Barrera L,Chinen Y, Thacker MM, Mackenzie WG, Suzuki Y, OriiT. 2011. Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA (Morquio Adisease): clinical review and current treatment. CurrPharm Biotechnol. 12:931�945.
van Diggelen OP, Zhao H, Kleijer WJ, Janse HC, PoorthuisBJ, van Pelt J, Kamerling JP, Galjaard H. 1990. Afluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Morquiodisease type A (MPS IV A). Clin Chim Acta. 187:131�139.
Yoo JU, Barthel TS, Nishimura K, Solchaga L, Caplan AI,Goldberg VM, Johnstone B. 1998. The chondrogenicpotential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymalprogenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80:1745�1757.
Zhang H, Marshall KW, Tang H, Hwang DM, Lee M, LiewCC. 2003. Profiling genes expressed in human fetalcartilage using 13,155 expressed sequence tags. Osteoar-thritis Cartilage. 11:309�319.
Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI,Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, HedrickMH. 2002. Human adipose tissue is a source of multi-potent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 13:4279�4295.
Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ,Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. 2001. Multilineagecells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 7:211�228.
Animal Cells and Systems 249
Copyright of Animal Cells & Systems is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its contentmay not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyrightholder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles forindividual use.