Agenda - IMAP - Homeimap.vic.gov.au/uploads/Meeting Agendas/2017 February... · 2017-02-20 · 24...

24 February 2017

1

Agenda

Inner Melbourne Action Plan Implementation Committee

Meeting No 45

8.00 am – 10.00 am Friday 24 February 2017 City of Yarra

Meeting Room 1, Richmond Town Hall Bridge Road, Richmond

Committee

Members Cr Amanda Stone, Mayor, City of Yarra (Chair) Cr Bernadene Voss, Mayor, City of Port Phillip Cr Sarah Carter, Deputy Mayor, Maribyrnong City Council Cr Jami Klisaris, Mayor, City of Stonnington Cr Nicholas Reece, Chair Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee, City of Melbourne Ms Carol Jeffs, Interim Chief Executive Officer, City of Port Phillip Mr Stephen Wall, Chief Executive Officer, Maribyrnong City Council Mr Warren Roberts, Chief Executive Officer, City of Stonnington Ms Kate Vinot, Director City Strategy & Place, City of Melbourne Ms Vijaya Vaidyanath, Chief Executive Officer, City of Yarra

Associate Partner

Representatives

Mr Adrian Salmon, Principal Planner, Planning Services, DELWP Mr Rod Anderson, Strategy & Partnerships Regional Manager-Port Phillip, DELWP Mr Michael Hopkins, Interim Deputy Secretary, Network Planning Transport Group, DEDJTR Mr Steve Booth, Director Economic Outcomes, Metropolitan Economic Development DEDJTR Mr Scott Lawrence, Regional Director Eastern Region, VicRoads – for Vince Punaro Ms Emily Mottram, Director Urban Renewal, Metropolitan Planning Authority

IMAP Ms Elissa McElroy, IMAP Executive Officer

Guests Mr Toby Kent, Chief Resilience Officer, 100 Resilient Cities Mr Geoff Lawler, Senior Strategic Advisor, City of Melbourne/Chair Resilient Melbourne Steering Committee Mr Stuart Draffin, General Manager Planning & Amenity, City of Stonnington IMAP Champions Ms Jane Waldock, Assistant Director Planning & Placemaking, City of Yarra, Mr Aidan O’Neill, Acting Manager Strategy and Growth, City of Port Phillip Ms Tracey Limpens, Advocacy Performance & Improvement Manager, City of Stonnington Mr Geoff Robinson, Manager Engineering Services, City of Melbourne Ms Katy McMahon, Manager City Business, Maribyrnong City Council

PRELIMINARIES

Item Time Alloc.

Agenda Topic Responsibility

1. 2 mins Commence 8.00am

Appointment of Chair

Cr Amanda Stone, Mayor, City of Yarra

IMAP Executive Officer

2. 2 mins Introductions and Apologies

Mr Vince Punaro, Regional Director Metro NW Region, VicRoads

Chair

24 February 2017

2

3. 1 min Members Interest

Disclosure by members of any conflict of interest in accordance with s.79 of the Act

Chair

ITEMS

Item Time Alloc.



Confirmation of Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee (Attachment 1) Recommendation: 4.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm

the draft Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee No. 44 held on 9 December 2016 as an accurate record.

Chair


Confirmation of Minutes of the IMAP Executive Forum (Attachment 2) Recommendation 5.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm

the draft minutes of the IMAP Executive Forum No 21 held on 20 January 2017, as an accurate record.

Chair


Business Arising (Attachment 3) Recommendation 6.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the

actions undertaken in response to Business Arising from the previous minutes.



Presentation – Update from Resilient Melbourne [Early item as presenters have another engagement at 9.30am]

Toby Kent, 100 Resilient Cities; Geoff Lawler CoM


Financial Report (Attachment 4) Recommendation 8.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to receive

the IMAP Financial Report for the six months ending 31 December 2016.


9.

10 mins Commence 8.50am

IMAP Communication and Governance (Attachment 5) Recommendation 9.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the

Communications and Governance Briefing Paper.



Progress Report (Attachment 6) Recommendation 10.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the

IMAP Progress Report for February 2017.



Presentation - Census for Landuse & Employment (CLUE)

The CLUE data system - update from the City of Melbourne

Kate Vinot, CoM

24 February 2017

3

CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

Meeting to be closed in accordance with Sections 89 (2) (d, e, f, h) of the Local Government Act (1989)

Public and Associate Members can be excluded for these items

Item Time Allot.



Confirmation of Minutes (Attachment 7) Recommendation 12.1 Recommendation: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm

the draft Minutes of the Confidential business of the IMAP Implementation Committee No. 44 held on 9 December 2016 as an accurate record.

Chair

13. 5 Mins Commence 9.30am

Action 11 Regional Tourism – Update to the Production & Distribution Agreement with Destination Melbourne Ltd (Attachment 8) Recommendation 13.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolve to:

Approve the update of the Production & Distribution Agreement with Destination Melbourne Ltd to print and distribute the IMAP map as part of the Official Visitor Map for a further 3 years.

Authorise the CEOs of the Cities of Stonnington, Maribyrnong, Yarra and Port Phillip and the Director City Strategy & Place, City of Melbourne to sign the Agreement on behalf of the IMAP Councils

Sheri Peters, CoPP

OTHER BUSINESS

Item Time Allot.



Any other business Close Next Meeting Friday 26 May 2017 (8.00am) City of Melbourne – Council Meeting Room 1, Melbourne Administration Building, Swanston Street, Melbourne

Chair

ATTACHMENTS Item No

Attachment No

Attachment Topic

4. Attachment 1 Draft Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee meeting No. 44 held on 9 December 2016

5. Attachment 2 Draft minutes of the IMAP Executive Forum No 21 held on 20 January 2017

6. Attachment 3 Business Arising

8.. Attachment 4 Attachment 4a Attachment 4b

IMAP Finance report IMAP Operating and Capital Works statement for the 6 months to 31 December 2016 IMAP Budget and Expenditure by Project

9.. Attachment 5 IMAP Communications and Governance report

10. Attachment 6 IMAP Progress Report February 2017

Confidential agenda items

12. Attachment 9 Confidential Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee No 44 held 9 December 2016

13 Attachment 10 Action 11 Tourism – Agreement with DML

24 February 2017 - Confidential

1

Agenda – Confidential Business

Inner Melbourne Action Plan Implementation Committee

Meeting No 45

8.00 am – 10.00 am Friday 24 February 2017 City of Yarra

Meeting Room 1, Richmond Town Hall, Bridge Road, Richmond

Committee

Members Cr Amanda Stone, Mayor, City of Yarra (Chair) Cr Bernadene Voss, Mayor, City of Port Phillip Cr Sarah Carter, Deputy Mayor, Maribyrnong City Council Cr Jami Klisaris, Mayor, City of Stonnington Cr Nicholas Reece, Chair Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee, City of Melbourne Ms Carol Jeffs, Interim Chief Executive Officer, City of Port Phillip Mr Stephen Wall, Chief Executive Officer, Maribyrnong City Council Mr Warren Roberts, Chief Executive Officer, City of Stonnington Ms Kate Vinot, Director City Strategy & Place, City of Melbourne Ms Vijaya Vaidyanath, Chief Executive Officer, City of Yarra

IMAP Ms Elissa McElroy, IMAP Executive Officer

Guests

Mr Stuart Draffin, General Manager Planning & Amenity, City of Stonnington IMAP Champions Ms Jane Waldock, Assistant Director Planning & Placemaking, City of Yarra, Mr Aidan O’Neill, Acting Manager Strategy and Growth, City of Port Phillip Ms Tracey Limpens, Advocacy Performance & Improvement Manager, City of Stonnington Mr Geoff Robinson, Manager Engineering Services, City of Melbourne Ms Katy McMahon, Manager City Business, Maribyrnong City Council

Public and Associate Members can be excluded for this item

CONFIDENTIAL AGENDA ITEMS

Item Time Alloc.


CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

Meeting to be closed in accordance with Sections 89 (2) (d, e, f, h) of the Local Government Act 1989.

Procedural Motion: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to proceed into Confidential Business and the meeting be closed to the public as the matter to be considered falls within the ambit of: Section 89 (2) (d) (contractual matters), and Section 89 (2) (h) (any other matter which the Council or Special Committee considers would prejudice the Council or any person) of the Local Government Act 1989.

Chair


2

ITEMS 12. 2 mins

Commence 9.25am

Confirmation of Minutes – IMAP Implementation Committee (Attachment 7) Recommendation 12.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm

the draft Minutes of the Confidential business of the IMAP Implementation Committee No. 44 held on 9 December 2016 as an accurate record.

Chair

13. 5 Mins Commence 9.30am

Action 11 Regional Tourism – Update to the Production & Distribution Agreement with Destination Melbourne Ltd (Attachment 8) Recommendation 13.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolve to:

Approve the update of the Production & Distribution Agreement with Destination Melbourne Ltd to print and distribute the IMAP map as part of the Official Visitor Map for a further 3 years.

Authorise the CEOs of the Cities of Stonnington, Maribyrnong, Yarra and Port Phillip and the Director City Strategy & Place, City of Melbourne to sign the Agreement on behalf of the IMAP Councils.

Sheri Peters, CoPP

Procedural Motion: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves that the meeting be re-opened to the public.

Chair

ATTACHMENTS

Item No

Attachment No Attachment Topic

12. Attachment 7

Confidential Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee No 44 held 9 December 2016

13 Attachment 8 Action 11 Tourism Agreement with DML


3

24 February 2017 Attachment 1

1

DRAFT Minutes Inner Melbourne Action Plan Implementation Committee

Meeting No 44

8.00 am – 10.00 am Friday 9 December 2016 City of Port Phillip

Council Chambers, St Kilda Town Hall, 99a Carlisle Street, St Kilda

Attendance:

Committee Members

Cr Bernadene Voss, Mayor, City of Port Phillip (Chair) Cr Jami Klisaris, Mayor, City of Stonnington Cr Nicholas Reece, Chair Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee, City of Melbourne Ms Tracey Slatter, Chief Executive Officer, City of Port Phillip Mr Stephen Wall, Chief Executive Officer, Maribyrnong City Council Mr Warren Roberts, Chief Executive Officer, City of Stonnington Ms Linda Weatherson, Acting Director City Operations, City of Melbourne

Associate Partner

Representatives

Mr Adrian Salmon, Principal Planner, Planning Services, DELWP Mr Lawrence Sayers, DEDJTR - for Michael Hopkins Mr Steve Booth, Director Economic Outcomes, Metropolitan Economic Development DEDJTR Mr Vince Punaro, Regional Director Metro NW Region, VicRoads

IMAP Elissa McElroy, IMAP Executive Officer

Guests Mr Mark Curry, Executive Director, Office for Suburban Development, DELWP Mr Dale Stewart, Senior Recreation Planner, City of Melbourne Ms Azadeh Mousavi, IMAP Project Officer, City of Melbourne Ms Virginia Miller, Acting Coordinator Economic Development, City of Port Phillip Mr Stuart Draffin, General Manager Planning & Amenity, City of Stonnington Ms Kate Vinot, Director City Strategy, City of Melbourne Ms Claire Ferres-Miles, General Manager Place Strategy & Development, City of Port Phillip IMAP Champions Mr Damian Dewar, Acting Manager Strategy and Growth, City of Port Phillip Ms Tracey Limpens, Advocacy Performance & Improvement Manager, City of Stonnington

PRELIMINARIES

1. Appointment of Chair

1.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to appoint Cr Bernadene Voss, Mayor, City of Port Phillip as the Chair of the Meeting.

MOVED MS WEATHERSON / Mr Wall A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

2. Apologies

2.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the following apologies:

Cr Amanda Stone, Mayor, City of Yarra

Cr Catherine Cumming, Mayor, Maribyrnong City Council

Ms Vijaya Vaidyanath, Chief Executive Officer, City of Yarra

Mr Rod Anderson, Regional Manager Community Programs - Port Phillip region, DELWP


2

Ms Emily Mottram, Director Urban Renewal, Metropolitan Planning Authority

Mr Michael Hopkins, Interim Deputy Secretary, Network Planning Transport Group, DEDJTR MOVED MR ROBERTS / Cr Voss A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED The Chair acknowledged the traditional owners of the land and invited those present to introduce themselves. She noted this will be the last IMAP meeting for Tracey Slatter, CEO City of Port Phillip and acknowledged Ms Slatter’s work on the committee. Mr Walls noted the apology of Cr Cummings and requested consideration of a later meeting start time to better fit the Mayor’s schedule. The Executive Officer advised this matter could be discussed under item 8 (Communications & Governance).

3. Members Interest - Disclosure by members of any conflict of interest in accordance with s.79 of the Act. Cr Nicholas Reece advised he was an employee of The University of Melbourne and declared an interest in item 15.

ITEMS

4. Out of Committee Approvals - Confirmation of Minutes The Chair noted the minutes had been approved electronically and signed prior to the election. 4.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee ratify the following decision made out of Committee and confirmed on 22 September 2016: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to:

a. Confirm the draft Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee No. 43 held on 26 August 2016 as an accurate record.

MOVED MS SLATTER / Mr Roberts A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

5. Confirmation of Minutes of the IMAP Executive Forum

5.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm the draft minutes of the IMAP

Executive Forum No 20 held on 26 October 2016, as an accurate record. MOVED MR ROBERTS / Ms Slatter A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

6. Business Arising The Executive Officer updated the committee on the correspondence received: Att 3a- Email L Cavello CEO Destination Melbourne

Progress on the Melbourne Destination Management Plan to engage consultants was noted. Att 3b-Email G Spivak CoPP & University of Western Sydney – noting CLT project delays.

UWS require formal advice that the IMAP Council partners approve the delay. The Committee noted their approval.

Att 3c-Email S Price, Investment Manager-Investor Engagement, Investment & Economic Projects Division, DEDJTR – re establishment of CBD tourism helipad

The Executive Officer advised this matter was referred to City of Melbourne. Noted.

Att 3d-Letter C Toussaint, Wyndham City Council - re participation in Wayfinding signs project

The Executive Officer advised that this letter formally acknowledged Wyndham City Council’s funding and partnership arrangements on the signs project with the IMAP councils. Noted.

Att 3e-Email J Song, Deputy Director, Ministry of Personnel Management, Republic of Korea - re delegation and IMAP/Eco city visit

The Executive Officer advised this matter was referred to the City of Melbourne.

Att 3f-Letter City of Yarra - enclosing Council resolution on IMAP Implementation Project priorities

The Executive Officer noted this letter relates to item 12 (Three year Implementation program) and


3

advises the City of Yarra Council’s support for the top 5 priority projects for 2017-18.

Att 3g-Letter L Weatherson City of Melbourne - re CLUE project

This letter confirmed the CoM position in relation to advancing the CLUE project. The Executive Officer advised the project had now commenced and a report was in preparation for consideration by the Executive Forum following initial investigation.

Att 3h-Email J Newman Metro Waste & Resource Recovery Group - re CEO briefing on new plan

Executive Officer noted some IMAP councils have already been briefed on this through the Inner South Metro Mayors forum. Agreed no further briefing is required.

Ms Slatter noted a Board vacancy and that the IMAP councils should be represented. Referred to Other Business for discussion.

Att 3i-Email M Masson CEO Infrastructure Victoria - re release of discussion paper on ports

The Committee noted the recent release of the 30 year Infrastructure Plan. Committee suggested further discussion be undertaken in Other Business.

Att 3j-Email Infrastructure Victoria - re release of transport network pricing paper

The Committee suggested further discussion be undertaken in Other Business. Att 3k-Letter of support, T Slatter CEO City of Port Phillip - in support of Destination Melbourne’s grant application

CoPP letter on behalf of IMAP to support the grant application was noted. 6.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the actions undertaken in response to

Business Arising from the previous minutes.

MOVED MR WALL / Cr Klisaris A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED Actions: Executive Officer to reply to J Newman Metro Waste & Resource Recovery Group re CEO briefing Executive Officer to reply to University of Western Sydney – noting CLT project delays

7 Financial Report The Executive Officer advised billing the IMAP councils for this year’s revenue would take place later in December. She noted the CLUE Project expenditure was omitted but would be picked up in future reports. Cr Voss clarified the cost of the Cultural Guide against budget and requested copies be sent to all members of the committee. 7.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to receive the IMAP Financial Report for the

three months ending 30 September 2016. MOVED CR REECE / Mr Roberts A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED Actions: Executive Officer to revise the finance report to include the CLUE project budget & expenditure Executive Officer to ensure all members of the committee received the Cultural Guide

8. IMAP Communication and Governance The Executive Officer noted recent consultation to develop the Draft Three Year Implementation Plan, and noted reasons for closing down the IMAP GIS site and distributing the information to an open data site. She drew attention to the request by Maribyrnong City Council to start the meetings at a later time during 2017 and requested discussion on this matter. Comments/Questions

The Chair noted the clash with the Inner South Metro Mayor’s Forum should the meeting start at a later time. She suggested locations could be coordinated.

Cr Reece supported the 8am start time or suggested evening meetings as an alternative.

Mr Salmon supported the earlier start as it was part of the journey to work. Following general discussion it was determined the meeting time should stay the same and that an alternative delegate could be considered to represent Maribyrnong should the Mayor be unable to attend.


4

The Executive Officer noted that the Special Committee delegations were due for review under the Local Government Act following the local government election, and that this would provide the opportunity to consider an alternate before the next meeting.

8.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to: a. note the Communications and Governance Briefing Paper. b. approve the establishment of the IMAP Steering Groups as proposed to:

oversee the development of detailed project briefs contained in the Three Year Implementation Plan;

identify resourcing and nominate lead councils for IMAP projects;

establish specialised project teams;

report on implementation of the Inner Melbourne Action Plan 2016-26 c. confirm the IMAP Implementation Committee meetings at 8.00am for 24 February, 26 May

and 25 August 2017 meeting dates.

MOVED MS WEATHERSON / Mr Roberts A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED Action: Executive Officer to follow up renewal of Special Committee delegations and Maribyrnong representative.

9. Progress Report The Executive Officer advised this report provides an historic running record of progress on IMAP’s projects. 9.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the IMAP Progress Report for

December 2016. MOVED MR WALL/ Cr Reece A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

10. Presentation: Metropolitan partnerships - Update on the Metro Partnerships, the Economy Working Groups and their proposed work. Messrs Mark Curry DELWP and Steve Booth DEDJTR attended for this item and thanked the Committee for the opportunity to update them on the Metro Partnerships. Mr Curry provided context for the development of Metro Partnerships (MPs):

part of a broader regional governance arrangement to replace the 5 Regional Management Forums (RMFs). 9 partnerships in regional Victoria started 4-5 months ago.

6 metro partnerships are proposed for Metro Melbourne to start in March/April 2017; currently looking for community representatives

Led by Gavin Jennings MLC, Special Minister of State & the Hon. Lily D’Ambrosio MP, Minister for Suburban Development.

Acknowledged the significant history of IMAP, WIMEDA and other groups already established. Aim to utilise and work with these existing structures

Different from the RMF model which had lots of state government members. The MP has 1 Deputy Secretary from State Government to field and represent the broader state government roles.

3 levels of government to be represented on each Partnership – State Government; Local Government (all CEOs); Commonwealth rep from RDA; and up to 8 business and community reps; engaged to look at issues and priorities in partnership.

DELWP have called for EOI of nominees from community & business & are currently assessing 180 applications

Looking for balance across the 6 partnerships.

Public servants and councillors are excluded

Ministers will appoint community & business representatives & finalise these around February 2017. Cabinet is to endorse these, followed by an induction process.

There is no equivalent regional assembly process into Cabinet for Metro Melbourne to field or consider priorities.

5 year rolling plans are to be established for jobs, services and infrastructure, with a comprehensive range of priorities and initiatives. Plans are to be completed around July. There will be further thinking through the nature of these in the first year, and will be amended with more


5

input from the partnerships. Steve Booth noted the following:

DEDJTR is progressing initiatives for the Minister for Major Projects and Minister of Industry. Considering how we leverage infrastructure projects to get their maximum impact in an economic development sense?

Economy Working Groups are to: o Bring councils and DEDJTR together to leverage projects o Work with what flows out of Plan Melbourne in the precincts o Focus on a place-based economy and social development through the Economy Working

Groups

Council’s 4 year plans and State Government’s 5 year plans are very similar at the working level. Aim to be more aligned at Council and State levels so that we are more effective working together.

Want to work with the councils in the Inner Melbourne and the Inner South partnerships, with IMAP and through involving regional advocacy groups such as Lead West.

There are a lot of issues to consider in these regions e.g. Chadstone/Caulfield, South Melbourne, Fisherman’s Bend, Arden-Macaulay.

All work over the next 5-10 years will be city shaping work with input through the MPs and Economy Working Groups.

Questions/Comments What is the logic behind the changes in boundaries? A: Mr Curry noted the MPs aim to balance commonalities of interests amongst groups, create MPs of broadly similar population groupings, and keep the integrity of local government boundaries. Government wanted Maribyrnong in the west. Densification makes it more like Melbourne. RMFs were ineffectual and role of new partnerships is not clear, especially introducing business and community reps. Is MP’s role consultative, advisory, or an information exchange? Councillors and Council liaise with Government on a daily basis. Where do the partnerships sit within this context? Don’t see this Metro Partnership influencing the work we do in those local government entities (IMAP and Lead West) that we set up and we control. Is this duplication of effort? A: Mr Curry advised he was conscious of utilising existing work and not duplicating effort. The MP’s are largely for information exchange between portfolios. Not decision-making about resources, budgets etc. MPs supported projects will achieve direct visibility into State Government and go through consideration through the budget process. Over time, greater reflection of local priorities will be achieved. MP’s enable a greater influence on State Government spending decisions: an additional channel, not usurping Councils – but looking at the regional scale. Mr Booth acknowledged limitations of the RMFs. The various organisations need coordination to get real value. Metro Partnerships provide a greater coordination function to help Councils and State Government make decisions. Most transport projects are in the IMAP area. Melbourne gets 800,000+ people coming into work each day from the other council areas in IMAP. The CBD is a focus of interest. West transport routes are already overloaded. Need Footscray and Arden and Caulfield to be destination points. Don’t get this till get agreement between Councils on what this means in practice. If want to be a polycentric city, we need these conversations. Agree with Maribyrnong’s view that it’s important to have regional views, shared issues for Councils and mechanisms to feed into State Government. Structurally the partnerships will make that challenging with 5 CEOs and up to 8 community reps who are self-selecting. The mechanics of how regional clusters of Councils are engaged will affect the outcome, especially when CEOs are outnumbered. A: Mr Curry noted that in the Inner Metro area, with few CEOs, community reps would be less than 8. Partnerships could hold workshops and include councillors. City of Stonnington made an approach to stay in the inner area which was not achieved. We work collaboratively in IMAP and will continue. But it seems the jury is already out on another body being established. CEOs are not auspiced to agree or disagree, or have the ability to commit a Council to something. There are challenges with this structure – depends if 4 or 8 business views could be different to collective Council views. Why are Councillors not included?


6

A: Mr Curry noted the Minister has a strong position on this. Looking for new and additional voices. Councillors have their own voice. This is a complementary channel in addition to council avenues; MPs supplement the discussion with community and business reps who wouldn’t normally have a view. Mr Booth said the MPs are providers of advice. Ministers and Councillors make decisions. There is a distinction made between providing advice and having the final say. Is there opportunity for observers such as the IMAP Executive Officer to attend? A: Mr Curry said Yes. Also CEOs from other neighbouring partnerships could observe. Mr Booth noted the IMAP Executive Officer would be part of the Economy Working Group. The Chair noted we were out of time and thanked the presenters for their comments.

11. Action 5.5 Infrastructure development – IMAP Regional Active Sport and Recreation Facilities Planning Study project. Mr Dale Stewart and Ms Azadeh Mousavi, City of Melbourne attended for this item. Mr Stewart went through a PowerPoint presentation. He acknowledged and thanked Azadeh for her work and noted her contract was due to finish on 23 December. He advised:

the first stage of information coordination and analysis was complete.

a database holding 23 types of sport ground, pavilions, sport & recreation centres are mapped and centrally held on one database. Structure is established.

the distribution of sports facilities are mapped and we can drill down for details on each.

all attributes are given for each ground and pavilion.

some initial analysis has been undertaken and one case study was presented on cricket participation

Mr Stewart noted we need to decide how the councils will manage the data. SRV has done some work around sport participation and would like to have it included. It would help to keep Azadeh for longer to undertake additional analysis on this work.

The Executive Officer clarified that the budget funding for the data collection stage was spent and $150K was available for the Phase 2 consultant planning work. Some funds from this could be used for staff. She noted the VPA have indicated they may assist with additional funding if that left the funding short for stage 2.

Comments/Questions Mr Wall said growth and interest in the sport is also important as well as player numbers and population growth forecasts. He see large increases occurring in soccer and declines in other codes. This data is really useful for planning purposes and helps Councils make decisions on which assets to develop. Cr Reece noted this was a fantastic exercise and asked if there was a user interface to access the data. Mr Stewart advised the project would hand all data over to Councils and will determine how to deal with it and keep it up to date. A workshop was planned for 21 December to discuss these aspects. 11.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to:

a. Note the progress on Stage 1 of the IMAP Regional Active Sport and Recreation Facilities Planning Study project;

b. Approve further funding of approximately $8,000 from the project budget in order to complete Stage 1 and ensure the information is handed over to the IMAP Councils with an agreed maintenance methodology; and

c. Confirm the importance and priority of this project to ensure that clear direction is provided for officers and management across all the IMAP Councils

MOVED CR KLISARIS / Mr Wall A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

12. IMAP Three year Implementation Program The Executive Officer tabled a one page summary of the budget for the Three Year Implementation Plan with the inclusion of the current year and forecasted carry forward to assist the Committee. She noted

The City of Yarra has given their approval to the 5 priority projects listed in the plan for Year 1.

The funding request is on the same basis as 2016-17.

Once projects are confirmed in principle, then the Steering Groups can further determine the


7

project briefs, staff resourcing, timeframes and funding and come back to the committee with more detail at a later date.

Comments /Questions Ms Slatter noted her support for the projects and provided a handout with additional detail for consideration for the Whole of Waste Cycle planning project. Ms Ferres-Miles provided further advice to the committee about opportunities for IMAP to link into the Waste Forum group and access funding in the Sustainability Fund - which could change the brief for this project. Inner Melbourne has a landfill cap, and produces more organic waste than any other catchment, which has the potential to generate future revenue. Mr Roberts commented that the detail provided fitted within the overall broad objective of the project. He preferred no change to the current brief at this time as Councillors were still being consulted, but suggested the handout material be referred to the Steering Group to consider as part of the detailed brief for the committee’s future consideration. Ms Slatter agreed with this approach. Mr Roberts noted it was critical that IMAP put a case forward for funding from the State Government and he supported the intent of the proposal. The Executive Officer offered to assist Councils with briefing their Councillors on the IMAP Projects. 12.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to:

a. Note this update on progress on the Inner Melbourne Action Plan, and

b. Approve year 1 of the updated IMAP Three Year Implementation Plan; and note approval in principle for the following 2 years pending further advice in February 2017;

c. Approve the request for each of the IMAP Partner Councils to make provision for funding in the 2017-18 budget as follows:

IMAP Annual Contribution: $57,000 per Council in line with the current year

IMAP Share of Operational Costs: $38,000 per Council (Estimate – to be confirmed)

(Total $95,000 per IMAP Council)

MOVED MR ROBERTS / Ms Weatherson

A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED Actions: Refer the Waste cycle project proposal tabled by CoPP to the IMAP Environment Steering Group for consideration Advise the IMAP Councils of the 2017-18 budget request.

13. OTHER BUSINESS a. Metro Waste & Resource Recovery Group re CEO briefing on new plan and Board vacancy

The committee noted that this matter had been discussed as part of the discussion on item 12.

b. Infrastructure Victoria release of discussion paper on ports and release of transport network pricing paper

Mr Wall advised that he attended the Infrastructure Victoria (IV) workshop on ports where the discussion was on options for a second port. In the Hastings option the water based issues were good, and in the Werribee option land based issues were advantageous. Of note that is in all major cities of the world where the ports have been part of the central city, they have now moved on. Work is continuing in this space. Mr Sayers noted there are a number of Infrastructure Victoria discussion papers around and the new 30 year plan was available for consideration. It was generally agreed each Council would comment as appropriate and that IMAP as a group could not add anything to this discussion.


8

CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

The Meeting closed in accordance with Sections 89 (2) (d, e, f, h) of the Local Government Act (1989).

Procedural Motions: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to proceed into Confidential Business and the meeting be closed to the public as the matter to be considered falls within the ambit of: Section 89 (2) (d) (contractual matters), and Section 89 (2) (h) (any other matter which the Council or Special Committee considers would prejudice the Council or any person) of the Local Government Act 1989. [Time 9.54am] MOVED CR KLISARIS / Mr Wall A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves that the meeting be re-opened to the public. [Time 9.58am] MOVED MS SLATTER / Mr Wall A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED

17. Next Meeting Friday 24th February 2017 (8.00am) City of Yarra – Meeting Room 1, Richmond Town Hall, Richmond

The meeting was declared closed at 9.58am.

IMAP Implementation Committee Meeting 27 May 2016 – Endorsement of Minutes

Chairperson: Cr B Voss _________________________ Date ________________ RESOLUTIONS 1.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to appoint Cr Bernadene Voss, Mayor, City of Port Phillip as the

Chair of the Meeting.

2.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the following apologies: Cr Amanda Stone, Mayor, City of Yarra Cr Catherine Cumming, Mayor, Maribyrnong City Council Ms Vijaya Vaidyanath, Chief Executive Officer, City of Yarra Mr Rod Anderson, Strategy & Partnerships Regional Manager-Port Phillip, DELWP Ms Emily Mottram, Director Urban Renewal, Metropolitan Planning Authority Mr Michael Hopkins, Interim Deputy Secretary, Network Planning Transport Group, DEDJTR

4.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee ratify the following decision made out of Committee and confirmed on 22


9

September 2016: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to:

a. Confirm the draft Minutes of the IMAP Implementation Committee No. 43 held on 26 August 2016 as an accurate record.

5.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to confirm the draft minutes of the IMAP Executive Forum No 20 held on 26 October 2016, as an accurate record

6.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the actions undertaken in response to Business Arising from the previous minutes.

7.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to receive the IMAP Financial Report for the three months ending 30 September 2016

8.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to: a. note the Communications and Governance Briefing Paper. b. approve the establishment of the IMAP Steering Groups as proposed to:

a. oversee the development of detailed project briefs contained in the Three Year Implementation Plan; b. identify resourcing and nominate lead councils for IMAP projects; c. establish specialised project teams; d. report on implementation of the Inner Melbourne Action Plan 2016-26

c. confirm the IMAP Implementation Committee meetings at 8.00am for 24 February, 26 May and 25 August 2017 meeting dates.

9.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the IMAP Progress Report for December 2016.

11.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to: a. Note the progress on Stage 1 of the IMAP Regional Active Sport and Recreation Facilities Planning

Study project; b. Approve further funding of approximately $8,000 from the project budget in order to complete Stage 1

and ensure the information is handed over to the IMAP Councils with an agreed maintenance methodology; and

c. Confirm the importance and priority of this project to ensure that clear direction is provided for officers and management across all the IMAP Councils

12.1 That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to: a. Note this update on progress on the Inner Melbourne Action Plan, and b. Approve year 1 of the updated IMAP Three Year Implementation Plan; and note approval in principle for

the following 2 years pending further advice in February 2017; c. Approve the request for each of the IMAP Partner Councils to make provision for funding in the 2017-18

budget as follows:

IMAP Annual Contribution: $57,000 per Council in line with the current year

IMAP Share of Operational Costs: $38,000 per Council (Estimate – to be confirmed) (Total $95,000 per IMAP Council)

Procedural Motions: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to proceed into Confidential Business and the meeting be closed to the public as the matter to be considered falls within the ambit of: Section 89 (2) (d) (contractual matters), and Section 89 (2) (h) (any other matter which the Council or Special Committee considers would prejudice the Council or any person) of the Local Government Act 1989. [Time 9.54am]

That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves that the meeting be re-opened to the public. [Time 9.58am]

ACTIONS PUBLIC RECORD

Item Responsibility Action Due

6. Bus Arising


Executive Officer to reply to J Newman Metro Waste & Resource Recovery Group re CEO briefing Executive Officer to reply to University of Western Sydney – noting CLT project delays

Jan 2017

7. Fin Report


Executive Officer to revise the finance report to include the CLUE project budget & expenditure EO to ensure all members of the committee receive the Cultural Guide

Feb 2017

7. Comms & Gov


Executive Officer to follow up renewal of Special Committee delegations and Maribyrnong representative.

Dec 2016

12. Imp Plan


Refer the Waste cycle project proposal tabled by CoPP to the IMAP Environment Steering Group for consideration Advise the IMAP Councils of the 2017-18 budget request.

Feb 2017


Inner Melbourne Action Plan Executive Forum 1

DRAFT Minutes

Inner Melbourne Action Plan Executive Forum

Meeting No 21 4.00pm – 5.00pm Friday 20 January 2017

Committee Room - top floor, 311 Glenferrie Road, Malvern City of Stonnington

Attendance:

IMAP Executive Forum

Mr Warren Roberts – Chief Executive Officer, City of Stonnington (Chair) Ms Vijaya Vaidyanath – Chief Executive Officer, City of Yarra Ms Carol Jeffs – Interim Chief Executive Officer, City of Port Phillip Ms Kate Vinot, Director City Strategy & Places, City of Melbourne

IMAP

Elissa McElroy – IMAP Executive Officer

Guests Mr Austin Ley, Principal Consultant, Planning for Change Mr Stuart Draffin, General Manager Planning & Amenity, City of Stonnington Mr Andrew Scarlett, Economist, City of Port Philip (arrived 4.15pm)

PRELIMINARIES

Item Agenda Topic

1 Appointment of Chair

1.1 The IMAP Executive Forum appointed Mr Warren Roberts as the Chair of the Meeting.

2 Apologies

Ms Linda Weatherson, Acting Director City Operations, City of Melbourne

Mr Stephen Wall – Chief Executive Officer, Maribyrnong City Council 2.1 That IMAP Executive Forum accept the apologies.

ITEMS 3 IMAP Councils Data Requirements Project (CLUE)

Mr Austin Ley attended for this item. He noted that:

this study is the step prior to undertaking the “CLUE” Project and investigates what research is being used by the IMAP Councils and for what purpose.

Staff input from Economic Development (ED) and Strategic Planning (SP) has been achieved (not from the wider Council departments)

Seeks clarity on whether to concentrate on these 2 areas or go through budgets to look for the wider use of data.

Questions/Comments City of Yarra mainly need economic and strategic planning data quickly as these areas are under pressure. Data assists greatly with Structure Planning activities, and for greater detail on confined areas, creative



clusters, silos etc. Yarra do not have significant funding for this, but need a spatial tool and greater clarification on whether CLUE is the right tool. Want to get qualitative data so can assess how businesses operate, employment patterns,, segmentation of industries etc City of Melbourne are interested to know what data in CLUE is considered the most useful. City of Stonnington data needs are not necessarily all associated with CLUE and data/analysis would still need to be purchased. Agrees with Yarra, that some data would really assist in understanding of specific areas. Data is not needed for the whole municipality, useful for key growth areas. CoS has limited industrial space showing little change; residential based businesses are becoming important. Looking for a more compact version of CLUE, not requiring a large research department. Need to focus on a solution that supports ED and SP but provides the return on investment. Mr Ley advised CLUE provides detail on business activity in non-residential areas. The Urban Manufacturing project has identified categories and residential areas where more detail is required on those businesses described as ‘Other”. CLUE looks at all businesses from a land perspective. iCloud businesses would need to have a location in order to be picked up by CLUE researchers. He noted City of Melbourne developed CLUE. VicCLUE took the model further until the State Government pulled out. Ms Vinot noted that City of Melbourne will continue with CLUE which is now fundamental to providing: information to media queries,

answering questions such as the % of land moving to residential uses in the CBD,

providing ‘ready to hand’, up to date information to help understand trends,

assisting the Council to make its own decisions, and

to influence State Government through the use of accurate data.

Provide current information for Structure Plans, with 15 years or more of trend data to assist future planning

CoM needs to refresh CLUE and consider what KPIs it collects data on. Ms Jeffs asked for a presentation on what CLUE data looks like so the Executive Forum can consider what parts IMAP Councils want. Is it all or nothing? Mr Ley noted a site visit would not be cost-efficient if all the data wasn’t collected at the time. Mr Ley noted the following questions to address:

Can CLUE – or an augmented version of it – provide Councils with what they need?

Can a number of users get it at some cheaper margin?

Is it a bit better or a lot better than what we have now? He noted that VicCLUE failed as no one championed it, and that CLUE needs to be embedded in organisations and supported from the top down for best utilisation and cost/benefit. Employment information is fundamental to economic development and inner city development planning - and the only way to get this information is to ask companies for it. The Federal Government has access through the tax office but this geo-coded information cannot be released. If this was accessible, we would have a national census of employment. CLUE drills down and is able to provide economic assessments. Mr Ley noted from his consultation that there are inconsistencies across the 5 councils; they undertake work in different ways, hold data in business registers differently. They respond to particular needs at particular times. Often the data is not comparable as a result. There is benefit in not losing the data over time and having consistency in the way it is collected. Need to compare CLUE data sets with Council’s data sets. Mr Scarlett noted the council relies on both ProfileID and consultant’s work. There are limitations in ProfileID e.g. connecting job numbers to landuse – and CoPP have to rely on consultants to provide this analysis. Ms Vinot noted the project needs to focus on:

How much data is collected systematically by councils

How much data is not in the system,

What data is missing that Councils need; and

Map this comparison between CLUE and other data sources

The Executive Forum confirmed that this investigation should be confined to Economic Development and Strategic Planning areas.



Once this area is confirmed, we will be able to move to the next phase. This information will help make the decision when that time comes. Ms Vaidyanath noted her interest in knowing the richness of the data; gaps in the research Ms Jeffs noted her interest in access to the data and taking a shared services approach to this. What could we get out of a combined approach? What is the bigger policy imperative? How would it help our advocacy and achieving IMAPs strategic plan? The collective Business Case for this project needs to identify the benefits – the consistency of the data, its seamlessness, its importance to planning, the value of information on how businesses operate in Melbourne. The Chairman summarised the process to date: from the decision in May to look at the costs and benefits of an IMAP CLUE, approval of the initial investigation in August last year, and limits encountered to preparing a business case for CLUE due to the constraints of getting the information and the inconsistencies in how we all collect data. There is a need to now:

Identify the datasets used by ED and SP

Identify what Councils could use CLUE Data for

Identify what we currently use data for, and

Identify how the CLUE data and Councils data sets match up. This needs to be done before we can identify the benefit of doing an IMAP ‘something”. The Executive Forum confirmed the need to undertake further discussions with staff on:

What data sets are used by ED and SP in the Councils, and what do they use them for?

What is in CLUE’s data set?

What are the links between both approaches, and what are the gaps?

The strategic advantages and value of having good data. Ms Vinot suggested this can be achieved by showing Councils a list of the CLUE data and getting them to identify whether they collect it by other means, how frequently, what its used for and what is not on the CLUE list that councils collect and find useful. It would also be useful to find out, if they had access to longitudinal data, how they would use it. Mr Roberts left the meeting for a short time and returned at 4.45pm 3.1 That the IMAP Executive Forum resolves that:

Mr Ley undertake additional research that o maps Councils’ current Economic Development and Strategic Planning data

against the CLUE data base; o identifies applications/uses of consultant data (and uses of longitudinal CLUE data); o identifies any significant data gaps in both CLUE or Council data; and o identifies what data in CLUE is considered the most useful

a presentation on CLUE be provided as part of the presentation on findings at a later Executive Forum meeting

MOVED/Seconded MR ROBERTS / Ms Vaidyanath The MOTION was CARRIED. Actions:

Mr A Ley to undertake the next steps of the investigation on research data as outlined in the resolution

IMAP Executive Officer to request a presentation on CLUE from the CoM research department to the Executive Forum.

OTHER BUSINESS

4 Other Business Action 7.2 Urban Manufacturing Phase 2 - Collaborative Research Agreement with the University of Melbourne



The Executive Officer noted that all 5 councils and Moreland City had now signed this agreement. However she advised the Victorian Planning Authority had requested 3 minor changes to the Agreement which related to the full name of the Act, the correct name of the Authority and the use of intellectual property information for planning purposes in addition to publication. The Executive Forum agreed to these changes and advised they would need to authorise them through initialling all changes on the Agreement. 4.1 That the IMAP Executive Forum resolves to accept the three (3) minor amendments to the Urban

Manufacturing Collaborative Agreement with the University of Melbourne and that all changes be initialled by all signatories.

MOVED/Seconded MS VAIDYANATH / Ms Jeffs The MOTION was CARRIED. Close Next Meeting – As required

RESOLUTIONS

1.1 The IMAP Executive Forum appointed Mr Warren Roberts as the Chair of the Meeting. 2.1 That IMAP Executive Forum accept the apologies. 3.1 That the IMAP Executive Forum resolves that:

Mr Ley undertake additional research that: - maps Councils current Economic Development and Strategic Planning data against the CLUE data base

- identifies applications/uses of consultant data (and uses of longitudinal CLUE data);

- identifies any significant data gaps in both CLUE or Council data; and - identifies what data in CLUE is considered the most useful

4.1 That the IMAP Executive Forum resolves to accept the three (3) minor amendments to the Urban Manufacturing

Collaborative Agreement with the University of Melbourne and that all changes be initialled by all signatories.

ACTIONS


The IMAP Executive Officer to request a presentation on CLUE from the CoM research department to the Executive Forum.


Report prepared by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer

IMAP Implementation Committee

Business Arising

24 February 2017

A IMAP Implementation Committee (28 November 2014) Responsibility Action Due Progress

12 Action 9.4 GGG

Coordinator Green Infrastructure CoM

The Coordinator Green Infrastructure, City of Melbourne to identify appropriate staff to attend the Policy Reference group and report back on issues raised.

TBA

B IMAP Implementation Committee (27 November 2015) Responsibility Action Due Progress

14 Housing


Executive Officer to add Affordable Housing discussion to the February agenda.

Feb Deferred to later meeting by Exec Forum

C IMAP Executive Forum (19 May 2016 – and 30 May 2014)

Responsibility Action Due Progress

13 Other Bus (30 May 2014) and Item 6 IMAP CLUE

CoM - Manager City Research (Austin Ley)

Convene a Working Group of the IMAP Councils with City of Melbourne’s Manager City Research (Austin Ley) to examine sharing the costs and benefits of establishing an IMAP CLUE . Austin Ley to prepare a report on an IMAP CLUE and refer it to the Executive Forum for comment.

ASAP TBC

In Progress

D IMAP Implementation Committee (27 May 2016) Responsibility Action Due Progress

9. Progress report

Executive Officer/ Executive Forum

Further opportunities for IMAP advocacy with the Minister to be discussed by the Executive Forum

TBA

11. Action 9.4

Executive Officer Executive Officer to follow up on how the Burnley research can add to the work undertaken on the Growing Green Guide through greater application in the Melbourne context so that we can achieve more awareness and greening in inner Melbourne

Aug 2016 In Progress. Initial discussions held with UniMelb at recent project update in November

E IMAP Implementation Committee (26 August 2016) 9. Progress report

Executive Officer Executive Officer to follow up outstanding items under Action 6.3 (Report requested for next meeting): Arrange preparation of a submission to the Department of Justice on changes to the definitions (from 25 May 2012)

Dec 2016 Lead council and staff to be nominated to complete this work

F IMAP Implementation Committee (9 December 2016) Responsibility Action Due Progress

6. Bus Arising IMAP Executive Officer

Executive Officer to reply to J Newman Metro Waste & Resource Recovery Group re CEO briefing Executive Officer to reply to University of Western Sydney – noting CLT project delays

Jan 2017 Completed Completed

7. Fin Report IMAP Executive Officer

Executive Officer to revise the finance report to include the CLUE project budget & expenditure EO to ensure all members of the committee receive the Cultural Guide

Feb 2017 Completed Completed – circ with agenda papers

8. Comms & Gov


Executive Officer to follow up renewal of Special Committee delegations and Maribyrnong representative.

Dec 2016 Completed

12. Imp Plan IMAP Executive Officer

Refer the Waste cycle project proposal tabled by CoPP to the IMAP Environment Steering Group for consideration Advise the IMAP Councils of the 2017-18 budget request.

Feb 2017 Completed – considered at meeting 17 Feb Completed


Report prepared by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer

G IMAP Executive Forum (20 January 2017) Responsibility Action Due Progress

3. Data investigation project

IMAP Executive officer / Planning for Change - ALey


TBA In progress

3. Data investigation project

IMAP Executive officer

IMAP Executive Officer to request a presentation on CLUE from the CoM research department to the Executive Forum.

TBA Refer Agenda –presentation by CoM

Recommendation: That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the actions undertaken in response to business arising from the previous minutes.


Page 1 of 2 Report prepared by: IMAP Executive Officer


Financial Report for the Six Months ending 31 December 2016

1 July 2016 – 31 December 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________

Background

1. The IMAP financial position was last noted at the IMAP Implementation Committee meeting held on 9 December 2016.

2. Retained Earnings carried forward from the 2015-16 financial year totalled $650,073 (excluding

GST).

Income

3. Income indicates the Carry Forward of $650,073 during the first quarter. Invoicing the IMAP Councils for the 2016-17 contributions was undertaken in late December - the revenue will be accounted for in the second and third quarters.

4. Total Income for the 6 month period to 31 December 2016: 2800 Sundry Income:

Retained Earnings carried forward from 2015-16 $ 650,073 CoM Tourism contribution towards the DML agreement $ 10,000 Recreation Project Contributions - City of Yarra $ 10,000 - City of Maribyrnong $ 10,000 - City of Melbourne $ 10,000 Annual Regional Tourism Contributions (5 Councils) - City of Stonnington $ 20,000 $ 710,073

2810 Contract Income: IMAP Councils Annual IMAP Contributions (5 Councils) - City of Stonnington contribution $ 35,000

_______________________________________________________________________________

TOTAL OPERATING INCOME $745,073 ________________________________________________________________________

Expenditure

5. Total Expenditure for the 6 month period to 31 December 2016:

4180 Training & Conferences Action 9.2 Airfares to Canberra - Urban Design conf. $ 1,246 Conference registrations $ 545 $ 1,791 4040 Contract Staff Action 5.5 Reimburse CoM Project Staff costs - Recreation project $ 40,000 4104 Postage and Courier

IMAP Couriers September $ 748 Couriers December $ 134 $ 882

4105 Printing IMAP IMAP Implementation Plan Brochure printing $ 2,029 4106 Software Support


Page 2 of 2 Report prepared by: IMAP Executive Officer

Action 9.2 Basecamp reimbursement petty cash $ 34 4108 Stationery IMAP Meeting agendas $ 218 4131 Promotional Publicity Action 9.2 ESD Factsheets – Reimburse Basecamp subs $ 708 Reimburse Basecamp subs $ 891 Action 11 Cultural Guide – Photography $ 4,950 Cultural Guide - Cultural Victoria contribution $ 29,700 Cultural Victoria IMAP membership $ 2,500 Cultural Guide Copywriting $ 140 Less Accrual City of Port Phillip (Paid 2015-16) - $ 1,517 $ 37,371 4150 Consulting Fees IMAP IMAP website Domain renewal $ 44 GGG website Domain renewal $ 52 IMAP Basecamp Classic Subscription 1yr $ 335

International transaction fee $ 8 IMAP Basecamp Subscription – storage $ 134 International transaction fee $ 3 IMAP website Host Collabforge $ 3,377 Annual Report Design $ 3,420 Annual Report Summary Design/Print $ 2,530 Workshop/Presentation pack - Business Aspect $ 12,930

CLUE Planning for Change – payment 1 of 2 $ 5,000 Accrual Planning for change $ 1,818 Action 2.2 Wayfinding MSG – Traffinity – AustStd/MSG $ 6,300 Editing $ 600 Action 9.4 Uni Melb Linkage Grant contribution – 3 of 3 $ 20,000 Action 11 Cultural Guide – Editing $ 2,450

IMAP Map changes – Cruise guide $ 500 Visual Voice License fee – CBD Map $ 425 $ 59,926 4211 Staff Catering IMAP IMAP Project workshop catering $ 181 IMAP staff meetings $ 108 $ 289 4256 Equipment hire Action 11 Culture Guide launch - equipment $ 624

TOTAL EXPENDITURE $ 143,163 ________________________________________________________________________ Operating Profit / (Loss) $ 601,909 ________________________________________________________________________

NET SURPLUS $ 601,909 ________________________________________________________________________

6. Refer to Attachment 4b to see total expenditure against project budgets to date.

Recommendation 7. That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to receive the IMAP Financial Report for the Six

Months ending 31 December 2016.

24 February 2017 Attachment 4a

IMAP Operating Report.

Operating & Capital Works Statement for period ended December 2016

EMCELROY 17-Feb-2017 12:36:15

EMCELROY 17-Feb-2017 12:36:15

Actuals Budget Variance Actuals Budget Variance

2810 - Contract Income 35,000 0 35,000 35,000 0 35,000

User fees 35,000 0 35,000 35,000 0 35,000

2800 - Sundry Income 50,000 0 50,000 710,073 0 710,073

Other Revenue 50,000 0 50,000 710,073 0 710,073

Total Operating Income 85,000 0 85,000 745,073 0 745,073

Total Normal Salary expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Annual Leave 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Long Service Leave 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net ADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 Workcover 0 0 0 0 0 04180 - Training/Conferences 0 0 0 1,791 0 (1,791) Training and Professional Development 0 0 0 1,791 0 (1,791) Extraordinary Staff Payments 0 0 0 0 0 04040 - Contract Staff 40,000 0 (40,000) 40,000 0 (40,000) Other Employee Expenses 40,000 0 (40,000) 40,000 0 (40,000)

Employee Benefits 40,000 0 (40,000) 41,791 0 (41,791)

4104 - Postage & Couriers 134 0 (134) 882 0 (882)4105 - Printing 0 0 0 2,029 0 (2,029)4106 - Software Support and Maintenance 0 0 0 34 0 (34)4108 - Stationery - General 0 0 0 218 0 (218)4131 - Promotional Publications 0 0 0 37,371 0 (37,371)4150 - Consulting Fees 15,348 0 (15,348) 59,926 0 (59,926)4211 - Staff Catering 0 0 0 289 0 (289)4256 - Vehicle, Plant & Equipment Hire 624 0 (624) 624 0 (624)

Materials and Services 16,105 0 (16,105) 101,373 0 (101,373)

Bad and doubtful debts. 0 0 0 0 0 0

Community Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0

Finance costs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Operating Expenditure 56,105 0 (56,105) 143,163 0 (143,163)

Surplus/ (Deficit) for the year 28,895 0 28,895 601,909 0 601,909

Other comprehensive income / expenditure.

Depreciation and amortisation 0 0 0 0 0 0

Operating Capital Expenditure 0 0 0 0 0 0

Net Surplus / (Deficit) 28,895 0 28,895 601,909 0 601,909

CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE

IMAP Budget 2016-17 - Expenditure by Project as at 31 December 2016

REVENUEBUDGET 2016-17Year 11

Carry forwardsBudget + Carry

forwardsACTUALS 1st qtr ACTUALS 2nd qtr

ACTUALS 3rd qtr

ACTUALS 4th qtr

Total YTD VARIANCE

CurrentExpenditure C/Fwd

IMAP Councils Annual Contribution ($35K each) 175,000 175,000 35,000 35,000 -140,000 175,000

IMAP Councils Annual Tourism Contribution ($20K each) 100,000 100,000 20,000 20,000 -80,000 100,000 IMAP Map Licence fees 700 700 0 -700City of Melbourne contribution (Action 5.5) Recreation Project 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 City of Yarra contribution (Action 5.5) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 City of Maribyrnong contribution (Action 5.5) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 10,000

SRV Grant (Held by CoM) Action 5.5 = $50K 0

Total Revenue 305,700 305,700 0 85,000 0 0 85,000 -220,700 305,000

PROJECT ALLOCATIONSBUDGET 2016-17Year 11

Carry forwardsBudget + Carry

forwardsACTUALS 1st qtr ACTUALS 2nd qtr

ACTUALS 3rd qtr

ACTUALS 4th qtr

Total YTD VARIANCE

Committed - Funded Notes Current

IMAPPostage, courier, travel stationery, logo, catering

Ongoing Annual costs 8,000 8,000 1280 494 1,774 -6,226 8,500

IMAPAnnual Report design and print

Ongoing Annual Costs 6,000 6,000 5,950 5,950 -50 5,950

IMAP GIS Expenses Ongoing Annual costs 7,850 7,850 - -7,850 -

IMAP Website Hosting Ongoing Annual costs 3,400 3,400 3,421 3,421 21 3,421

IMAP Update website New One off project to reflect new plan 41,600 41,600 - -41,600 20,000 21,600

IMAP IMAP Review Project Current(Approved Feb 2015) Imp Plan devt & Printing/Design costs 27,498 27,498 15,140 15,140 -12,358 27,500

2.2 Wayfinding signs CurrentC/F +CoM additional contribution $10k for 2016-17 design costs 29,013 29,013 6,300 600 6,900 -22,113 30,000

5.5Infrastructure Development: Recreation facilities project

Current

(Funds approved Exec Forum Jan 2016.) C/F = $40K +CoS and CoPP contributions. 2016-17: Budget $50K+CoMar+CoM+CoY contributions

80,000 60,000 140,000 40,000 40,000 -100,000 90,000 50,000

7.2Support creative Industrues: Urban Manufacturing Project

CurrentPhase 2. C/F $20K+ MoreCC+VPA contributions. 2016-17 IMAP Budget $50K

50,000 40,000 90,000 1,818 1,818 -88,182 90,000

9.4 Green demo projects CurrentUniMelb ARC grant contribution: Year 3 of 3 (Committed) 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 20,000 0 20,000

Current DML Map agreement Year 4 TBC 49,173 49,173 - -49,173 49,000

CurrentDML Destination Mgt Plan funded from C/ Fwd (Approved Nov 2015) 50,000 50,000 - -50,000 50,000

Current Cultural Guide( Approved May 2016) 42,200 42,200 39,740 39,740 -2,460 42,200 Current Tourism projects - TBD 50,827 18,583 69,410 925 624 1,549 -67,861 5,000 64,000

CLUE Project Current Initial investigation 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 -5,000 10,000

Total Expenditure 271,750 333,250 615,000 71,747 71,417 - - 143,164 461,571 146,500 Net Surplus (Deficit) 309,300- 71,747- 13,583 Opening Balance of IMAP Account 660,073 660,073 588,326 0Closing Balance of IMAP Account 350,773 588,326 601,909 0Please note that the funding calculation does not include Operational Costs of $40,000 per council in 2016/17.

3 Yr Imp Plan last reviewed and adopted Dec 2016

10,000

Forecast

10,900 CurrentESD Factsheets series 3 (approvedMay 2016) 16,500 1,872 -18,984

11 Regional Tourism Strategy

20,856 4,356 81 1,791

24 February 2017 Attachment 4b

9.2Environmentally Sustainable Design - commercial buildings


Report prepared by: Elissa McElroy, IMAP Executive Officer


Progress Report

IMAP Communications and Governance ___________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose

1 To advise the IMAP Implementation Committee of the progress of IMAP Communications and Governance during the last 3 month period.

Governance

2 IMAP Review:

Since December, the five IMAP Steering Groups have been convened and briefed on those projects endorsed by the IMAP Implementation Committee at the last meeting:

IMAP Communities Steering Group 2 February 2017

IMAP Neighbourhoods & Places Steering Group 16 February 2017

IMAP Transport Steering Group 17 February 2017

IMAP Environment Steering Group 17 February 2017

IMAP Economy Steering Group 23 February 2017

The Steering Groups will reconvene before the May committee meeting to provide input to project briefs for the 2017-18 projects, prior to presentation to the committee.

3 The IMAP Geographic Information System (GIS)

The GIS supplier has been advised to close the link to the IMAP website. The City of Stonnington GIS coordinator is assisting the Executive Officer in ensuring any relevant data is made available to councils through open data sites where applicable.

4 Renewal of Delegations to the IMAP Special Committees

The Executive Officer prepared a draft report for governance staff to finalise, for the 5 Councils to reaffirm the IMAP Implementation Committee delegations following Council elections, as required under the Local Government Act.

At the time of writing, the delegations were reapproved by the Councils on the following dates:

City of Melbourne 20 December 2016

City of Port Phillip 1 February 2016

City of Stonnington 6 February 2017

City of Yarra 7 February 2017

The Maribyrnong City Council has its meeting on this matter on 21 February 2017.

Communications

5 During the last 3 months the following activities have involved the Executive Officer and others in IMAP communications:

o Action 2.2 Wayfinding Signage Master Style Guide

13 January – planning meeting for the upcoming workshop

30 January – CoM hosted a Workshop to plan the future direction for the project

Ongoing review of Way Found – the master style guide, being designed by PTV

o Action 5.5 Community Infrastructure – Recreation Facilities Study

20 January – CoM hosted a workshop on the completion of stage 1 of the project.


Report prepared by: Elissa McElroy, IMAP Executive Officer

The project officer’s contract was extended by the City of Melbourne to late January. Further funding is being considered to extend the contract so that additional analysis can be undertaken and management of the data determined.

The Project Brief for consultant input to the second stage of this project is being drafted for review by the Project Team Leader.

Note: the City of Melbourne has offered to continue as the Lead Council for the extension of this project under the new plan.

o Action 7.2 Support Creative Businesses (Urban Manufacturing)

15 December and 10 February – Meetings of the Policy Reference Group

15 February – the Executive Officer met with members of the project team to look at how we provide consistent feedback on the draft report outline received from the University of Melbourne for comment.

The Executive Officer arranged for the signing of the Collaborative Research Agreement with the University of Melbourne across 6 of the 7 signatories. Minor amendments proposed by VPA were agreed to at the IMAP Executive Forum on 20 January. The Agreement is being recirculated to sign off on these changes.

o Action 9.2 ESD factsheets

3 February - Worked with CoPP staff to transfer the ESD Tools projects across to MAV (CASBE) from the IMAP council’s Basecamp share file software.

o Action 11 Regional Tourism

31 January – meeting of the Tourism Working Group

14/16 February – met with CoS legal counsel on IP issues around updating the IMAP map

The TWG representatives on Destination Melbourne’s Destination Management Plan Steering Committee have been helping to shortlist bids for this work and interview the preferred firms. A consultant firm has now been appointed. Council tourism staff are being asked to undertake significant work within tight deadlines to contribute to the consultant’s assessment.

o IMAP CLUE Project (Census for Landuse and Employment)

20 January - Consultant Austin Ley, Planning for Change, met with the IMAP Executive Forum and presented his initial findings. He sought the advice of the Executive Forum on next steps in mapping CLUE data against data being collected from other sources to determine application of data and gaps.

o Other

Set up invites to the IMAP Steering Groups, prepared information packs and agendas for the 5 meetings held in February. Provided the briefing on the IMAP projects at the meetings.

16 January – met with Toby Kent, Chief Resilience Officer, 100 Resilient Cities to review parallels between Resilience projects and IMAP

17 January – met with Kate Vinot, CoM on the Land Use Infrastructure Plan (LUIP) being developed by the City of Melbourne

8 February – met with Michelle Fitzgerald, Chief Digital Officer, and Manager Smart Cities, CoM on Smart City opportunities

20 January – prepared agenda and papers for the IMAP Executive Forum – refer Minutes on this ageanda.

Recommendation

6. That the IMAP Implementation Committee resolves to note the Communications and Governance Briefing Paper.


1

IMAP Progress Report February 2017

The Inner Melbourne Action Plan (IMAP) 2016-26 identifies 27 strategies across 5 Goals to help build the inner Melbourne region’s creativity, liveability, prosperity and sustainability across a range of diverse neighbourhoods experiencing rapid growth.

The following transition projects were commenced under the provisions of the former Inner Melbourne Action Plan; and continued in the new plan.

PROGRESS ON CURRENT PROJECTS

IMAP ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS

IMAP Review

BACKGROUND

On 28 June 2016 all 5 IMAP Council had approved the new Inner Melbourne Action Plan 2016-26. The plan is currently being edited and printed.

A new Three Year Implementation Plan has been developed following discussions with senior executives and a joint council staff workshop. The shortlist of 25 projects WAS made available to all councillors for consideration of the priorities being proposed. The IMAP Three Year Implementation Plan was approved by the IMAP Implementation Committee at their December meeting.

CURRENT PROGRESS

The five IMAP Steering Groups have been convened in February 2017 to undertake further work on the project briefs under each of the 5 goals.

IMAP CLUE (Census for Land use and Employment)

CURRENT PROGRESS

This project has now commenced the investigative phase to collect information on what data is currently purchased and utilised by the IMAP councils.

The data collected by the Census of Land Use and Employment (CLUE) by the City of Melbourne will be mapped against data used by the other councils to determine information gaps and priorities. The findings of the investigation will be prepared for review by the IMAP Executive Forum.

The IMAP Implementation Committee will receive a briefing on the uses of the CLUE data system by City of Melbourne at their February meeting.


2

GOAL 1 ECONOMY

Strategy 1.3

[Formerly Strategy 11 – Regional Tourism]

Regional Tourism Programme & Inner Melbourne Map

BACKGROUND

The IMAP Regional Tourism Working Group (TWG) has progressed its work through a number of three year strategic plans. The aim of the group is to promote the Inner Melbourne region to tourists and visitors. In recent years the group has undertaken a range of approaches, having successfully developed a number of visitor itineraries, promoted ‘Famils” to information centre volunteers from both Ballarat and Geelong, undertaken promotion of inner Melbourne on the Skybus, undertaken joint opinion research with Destination Melbourne, and provided a consistent promotional effort to delegates at major events such as the AIDS conference.

The most successful collateral developed by the group is the IMAP regional tourism map – now the Official Visitors Map which is promoted in conjunction with Destination Melbourne for wide distribution. The group has also been assisting development of a tourist bus route around inner Melbourne.

Work in 2016 included:

In January 2016 IMAP’s senior executives met with the interim CEO of Visit Victoria.

Agreement was reached this year with Destination Melbourne (DML) for the five councils to negotiate jointly on the provision of council services provided by DML.

An agreement was approved with DML for printing and distribution of the IMAP map through the Official Visitors Map. This has been extended for a further year.

IMAP agreed to part fund development of a Destination Management Plan for Metro Melbourne to be undertaken by DML

The Tourism Group collaborated with Cultural Victoria to develop a Cultural Guide which was launched in Windsor in October.

CURRENT PROGRESS

Destination Melbourne Ltd has advised they have appointed AEC Group to be the consultants in charge of the Destination Management Plan development. Representatives from the TWG are on the Steering Committee and have assisted with the assessment of consultant proposals. Stakeholder forums are to be held in each council region. Council Tourism staff are also being asked to undertake Product Audits as part of the development of the plan.

The agreement with Destination Melbourne for the use of the IMAP map in the Official Visitors Map is due for renewal. This matter will be discussed with the Committee at the February meeting.

TWG members are contacting those businesses which featured in the “Experience Culture Victoria 2016-17” Guide for feedback on their listings prior to deciding if they will recommend IMAP councils participating in a further edition.

Strategy 1.4

[Formerly Action 2.2 Co-ordinated pedestrian and public transport signage system]

Melbourne Wayfinding Signing Master Style Guide

BACKGROUND

Initially completed in 2010, this project has been reactivated, focussed on visitor signage.

In December 2012, the IMAP Implementation Committee approved participation in the Melbourne Visitor Signage project and the coordinating committee was established to guide its work. The Committee seeks to:


3

Build common threads between roads, public transport, tourism, pedestrian, cycling and street directional signage systems across the inner Melbourne region.

Apply consistent shared symbols and terminology across these key signage systems; and

Coordinate responses to signage requests by tourist attractions, precincts and major developments.

The Melbourne Visitor Signage coordinating committee comprises representatives of the five IMAP councils, City of Wyndham, Public Transport Victoria, VicRoads and Tourism Victoria. The aim is to build a Master Style Guide setting out agreed signing principles, guidelines and language (the ‘business rules’) to be adopted by collaborating authorities.

In April 2015 Paul Street, the Program Manager of Transport for London’s (TfL) Legible London wayfinding system visited for 12 days providing workshops on best practice examples, implementation processes and structures and a methodology for roll out of a comprehensive system. Following the TfL visit, the committee structured its work into two streams:

1. Collaborative projects

Master Style Guide. The final draft of the guide is completed and undergoing design and publication.

The guide outlines an agreed approach to content: signing principles, eligibility and selection criteria,

naming conventions, symbols and arrows, placement and location criteria, and ‘gateway’ signage.

Signage Infrastructure Design Workshops are looking at the design issues of signs - functionality,

legibility, accessibility and view from different distances. Prototype testing of a new design has been

undertaken at sites in Melbourne, Port Phillip and Wyndham.

Pilot projects proposed for North Melbourne, central city, Balaclava Station, Station Pier and Werribee will test the new sign design, content and placement with users: to understand their wayfinding needs and to build a robust evaluation framework.

2. Strategic approach

The project team are investigating:

the feasibility of building a single base map for metropolitan Melbourne for use by councils for wayfinding signage and other purposes; and

Commissioning a business case on the benefits of improved wayfinding signage in Melbourne.

CURRENT PROGRESS:

The visitor signage Master Style Guide (MSG) was endorsed by the IMAP Implementation Committee at its August 2016 meeting. The guide or ‘standards’ for signage that would be applicable across Victoria is entitled “Way Found” and is being designed by PTV for release as a reference document.

A Workshop was held by the project team on 30 January to plan the communication strategy for the launch of the new standards and to determine the next steps for the project.

The pilot of new sign designs at locations within the CBD and Werribee is progressing with work underway on identifying best locations and finalising installation details and content.


4

Goal 3 COMMUNITIES

Strategy 3.1

[Formerly Action 5.2 Affordable Housing]

Affordable Housing

BACKGROUND

Completed Stage 1: Planning mechanisms

Stage 2: Community Land Trust (CLT) Research Phase 1

Research undertaken on Community Land Trust models and their application in Australia is published in The Australian Community Land Trust Manual (refer copies held online).

IMAP and the City of Port Phillip were awarded the University of Western Sydney 2013 Partnership Award for their involvement in this project.

Current

Community Land Trust (CLT) Research Phase 2

Key research questions of this phase relate to:

identifying and researching appropriate financial products for the establishment of CLTs in

Australia: The team will work with banks and other lending institutions to develop appropriate loan

products for residents looking to buy a leasehold or shared equity interest in CLT housing

perform in-depth case studies. This task will involve the completion of up to four in-depth case

studies in a range of locations and scenarios.

February 2014: The Scope of Work for Phase 2 was reported to the IMAP Committee meeting and advice that fund raising had been successful

November 2014: the first meeting for Phase 2 was held to discuss the next stage.

March 2015: the UWS Partnership Agreement was finalised.

An update on the CLT work was provided to the IMAP Committee at their meeting in May 2015 and in February 2016.

June 2016: Project partners met by conference call to assess progress. A number of the case studies are still working through establishment issues and looking at design and build approaches which meet both sustainability and affordability aims. The discussion agreed a program of work planned for 2016-17.

9 November 2015: A World Homeless Day Symposium ‘Future of Inner City Social Housing’ was held by the City of Yarra to explore ways state and local government, as well as the private and non-government sector, can work together to increase the supply of social housing in inner Melbourne. A report on this event was considered at the November 2015 meeting.

December 2016: The University of Western Sydney advised partners about delays in the project.

Strategy 3.4

[Formerly Action 5.5 Infrastructure Development]

IMAP Regional Active Sport and Recreation Facilities Planning Study project.

BACKGROUND

Following work being undertaken by the Metropolitan Planning Authority and Sport and Recreation Victoria to plan for future requirements for open space, the Committee considered a proposal at the May 2015 meeting to investigate recreation facilities and open space requirements across the IMAP region, in response to future growth.


5

The detailed project brief was considered at the August 2015 meeting and a further report on funding implications were discussed in November 2015 and confirmed in February 2016.

An SRV regional planning grant application was submitted for this project and has been successful.

A Project Officer to assist the project commenced 6 months employment at the City of Melbourne on 16 May 2016

.

CURRENT PROGRESS

Data gathering across the councils and state government agencies for the project has largely been completed and an update was provided to the IMAP Committee at the December 2016 meeting advising on the completion of the phase 1 of this project.

A Workshop was held on 20 January 2017 to determine data storage and maintenance and to review the analysis that had been undertaken. Further work on the analysis stage is supported, and would require an extension to the Project Officer’s initial contract.

Preparation of the Consultant brief for phase 2 of the project is underway.

Strategy 3.6

[Formerly Action 6.3 Managing Conflict in Activity Centres]

Managing Conflict in Activity Centres

BACKGROUND

A submission to address the disparity between planning and liquor licensing Definitions in the legislation with the Department Environment Land Water and Planning (DELWP) has been proposed by the IMAP Implementation Committee. An initial meeting to discuss the approach to be taken was held on 5 February 2015.

CURRENT PROGRESS

At the August 2016 meeting, the committee requested this matter be followed up. The Executive Officer has been unable to progress this project due to other commitments. A lead council is sought to undertake this work.


6

GOAL 4 NEIGHBOURHOODS AND PLACES

Strategy 4.4 (Also 1.1)

[Formerly Action 7.2 Support Creative Industries]

BACKGROUND

Completed: Creative Industries

Current:

Urban Manufacturing Project - The Dilemma of Urban Employment Land

In a separate initiative, representatives of the IMAP Councils and University of Melbourne are investigating urban manufacturing in the Inner Melbourne region. The IMAP Committee considered the initial brief and recommendations at the November 2014 and February 2015 meetings to finalise the funds, timeframe and objectives for this project.

The following approach had been proposed for this project:

o Phase 1 (7 months) – Existing Resources, Pilot Study, and Definition

o Phase 2 (6 months) - Major survey and preliminary economic analysis.

o Phase 3 (3-5 years) – Economic Impacts.

PHASE 1 - PROJECT UPDATE

o A stakeholder workshop held on 28 May 2015 identified the need to broaden the project to include Moreland Council region and explore a technological method for conducting the survey. Moreland Council joined the project team and made a funding contribution

o The project team confirmed the information required to examine a complete picture of all three approaches – land, sector, and economic; is currently not in existence for Victoria to provide key data for the analysis of economic development in small manufacturing sectors.

o An update to the Steering Committee on 11 June 2015 proposed that the Project should apply for an ARC Linkage Grant. This was subsequently unsuccessful.

o The final report for Phase 1 was considered by the committee in August 2015 and adopted in February 2016: it outlines the findings from the analysis of existing data, inception workshop, and framing of the qualitative and quantitative studies that comprise the research. The report summarises the original project proposal and several strategic decisions modifying the scope and path of the research.

o The Maker. Melbourne website is live and has attracted over 140 entries from local businesses. The City of Stonnington assisted with raising the website’s profile.

o The Executive Forum reviewed the funding for Phase 2 at its meeting on 19 May 2016 and endorsed commencement of the next stage of the project.

CURRENT PROGRESS

An updated agreement with the University of Melbourne for funding the stage 2 research team is currently being signed by the 7 authorities partnering on the project.

The terms of reference were prepared for the establishment of a Policy Reference Group and the first 2 meetings were held in December and January to consider policy options.

A firm has been employed to follow up entries on the Maker. Melbourne website to increase the numbers completing the survey data, so that analysis of the data can commence.

The University has prepared the framework for the final report.

.


7

GOAL 5 LEADERSHIP IN SUSTAINABILITY

Strategy 5.4

[Formerly Action 9.2 Environmentally Sustainable Design – commercial buildings]

Sustainable Design Factsheets Project

BACKGROUND

Completed - Stages 1 & 2

Work commenced in December 2010 to identify ESD topics to be written up in the form of Factsheets for publication. The first 10 Factsheets pack was formally launched at the City of Melbourne on 11 May 2012. The Factsheets have been licensed for re-badging and use by other Melbourne Councils.

The Working Group reported in May 2014 that the 10 original fact sheets, designed to support the SDAPP framework, have become reference documents for the six local governments who had adopted the proposed local planning scheme amendment for ESD.

In August 2014 the working group investigated having CASBE oversee Council access to the Factsheets, to uphold standards and improve consistency. This has not eventuated.

5 additional topics were recently completed in 2016.

o Topics include:

1.0 Indoor environment quality

2.0 Energy efficiency

o 2.1 Sunshading

3.0 Water efficiency

4.0 Stormwater management

o 4.1 Site Permeability

5.0 Building materials

6.0 Transport

7.0 Waste management

8.0 Urban ecology

o 8.1 Green roofs, walls and facades

9.0 Innovation

10.0 Construction and building management

Melbourne’s Climate (including adaptation)

ESD Tools

The working group finalised and updated all factsheets and will relaunch the series in 2017. Approximately 20 Melbourne Councils now use the factsheets under an IMAP licence.

Additional factsheets to further extend the series were approved at the IMAP Implementation Committee meeting on 27 May 2016.

CURRENT PROGRESS

The project was presented at the 9th International Urban Design Conference held in Canberra in November 2016.

Work is continuing on the 5 additional factsheets to complete the current series:

1.1 Daylight

1.2 Ventilation

5.1 Windows and Glazing

6.1 Car Share

9.1 Innovation Strategies


8

Strategy 5.4

[Formerly Action 9.4 Green Demonstration Projects]

Green Roofs Research Project - Australian Research Council Linkage Grant

BACKGROUND

In 2013 the IMAP Implementation Committee partnered in an ARC Linkage Grant with the University of Melbourne and Melbourne Water for further research on the measurable impacts of green roofs: "Mimicking natural ecosystems to improve green roof performance”. The research project outcomes will provide design, monitoring and management recommendations for Green Roofs, particularly in relation to stormwater quality and quantity, temperature (building energy efficiency) and improved biodiversity.

Dr Nick Fisher, University of Melbourne updated the IMAP Committee on their research in February 2015 and 27 May 2016.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The IMAP projects continue to add value, deliver stronger relationships, practical solutions and strategic directions, and influence the liveability and sustainability

of the inner Melbourne region.

Agenda - IMAP - Homeimap.vic.gov.au/uploads/Meeting Agendas/2017 February... · 2017-02-20 · 24...

Documents

Transcript of Agenda - IMAP - Homeimap.vic.gov.au/uploads/Meeting Agendas/2017 February... · 2017-02-20 · 24...