AGENDA CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING COMMISSION … · 2020-07-07 · CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING...

July 9, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda

of 62

AGENDA

CITY OF LINDSTROM

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

Monday, July 9, 2018 6:30 P.M.

City Hall Chambers

13292 Sylvan Ave., Lindstrom, MN

CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE:

CALL OF ROLL:

CONSIDERATION OF AGENDA:

CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES:

1. Minutes of the June 7, 2018, meeting (pgs. 2-12)

2. Minutes of the June 11, 2018, meeting (pgs. 13-22)

PUBLIC HEARINGS/PRESENTATIONS:

1. Rose Hill (pgs. 23-38)

2. Neal Ave (pgs. 39-46)

BUSINESS:

1. Pervious Pavers (pgs. 47-60)

2. Development Updates (pgs. 61-62)

MISC. DISCUSSION:

ADJOURNMENT:


of 62

MINUTES

CITY OF LINDSTROM


WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7, 2018

6:30P.M.

Lindstrom Council Chambers



Chair Klun called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

CALL OF ROLL:

Members Present: Chair Mike Klun; Commissioners Jim Swanberg, Kevin Backer,

Orris Erlandson, Laurie Burington, Judy Chartrand, Greg Donovan

Members Absent: None

Others Present: City Administrator John Olinger, Deputy Clerk Melissa Glenna;

Council Liaisons Curt Flug & Dave Waldoch; City Planner Rita

Trapp; Greg Johnson (Nottingham Construction); Jesse Moxness

(Moxness Development Group), Eric Haseltine (Elevate Builders);

Jeanne Lamond, James Lamond, Dean Woodsend, John Adams,

Greg Duchaine, Mark Vanderwerf, Done Meyer, Jessica and Kirt

Hedquist, Cindy Farrell, Clay Layford, Jan Lifgren, Kevin

Stenson, Caroline Bengtson, Kevin Stachowski, Laura Lee, Brett

Lee, Tim Peterson, Jane Peterson, Richard and Valorie Pearson,

Karen Anderson, Bob Waddell, Shannon Novotny, Jason Aarnio,

Laurie Lewandosky, Gary Gerke


Motion by Backer, second by Donovan, to approve the agenda with addition of an

Overview Presentation of the Planning Commission Role by Rita. Motion passed

7-0.

CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES:

Motion by Burington, second by Swanberg, to approved the May 2, 2018, minutes as

presented. Chair Klun asked under Miscellaneous in the minutes with regard to a

timing application that was to be placed on the screen to time public comments at

three minutes each. Motion passed 7-0.



of 62

Planning Commission Role Presentation

Planner Rita Trapp, provided a presentation on the Role of the Planning Commission

explaining it is an advisory body comprised of residents of Lindstrom who care about the

City. Their job is to consider the findings of fact with regard to each proposed

development and to know the zoning code which includes the Comprehensive Plan that

was adopted in 2017. The Comp Plan is long-range, thoughtful document that considers

the best interest of the City into the future to 2040. In the Comprehensive Plan, the future

growth is contemplated through looking at past trends. With regard to housing,

Lindstrom has mostly single family units. There are mixed use units in the Downtown

mostly with some mixed use units by County Road 14 and Olinda Trail. Rita also

explained the current proposed developments are market driven as the owners are selling.

The City is not seeking out the proposed developments. Rita also noted that the City

Council is the decision making body. There are, however, Council Liaisons at the

Planning Commission who are speaking as citizens only. Rita then concluded the

presentation going over the Public Hearing Process where citizens who would like to give

input and ask questions need to introduce themselves including their address. They are

given 3 minutes for their public comment. She explained the need for respectful

communication during public hearings. After the public comment section ends then the

Planning Commission has their time to ask questions of the proposed developer.

1. Sunset Meadows

Motion by Erlandson, second by Donovan, to open the Public Hearing for Sunset Meadows

at 6:40pm. Motion passed 7-0.

The Public Hearing notice was published in the May 24th

and May 31st editions of the Chisago

County Press, and it was mailed to all property owners located within 350’ of the subject

property.

Planner Rita Trapp explained that Sunset Meadows is a re-plat of a 14 unit townhome

development on Morris Trail north of 295th

Street which was previously approved. 7 buildings

with 2 units each on 2.25 acres is proposed. The applicant requested additional time to prepare

for the Planning Commission’s review. Rita noted that as there was a public hearing noticed for

the consideration of the application, the Planning Commission should open the public hearing to

solicit input from those in attendance and then table the public hearing to the next meeting so

that as additional information is presented by the applicant interest individuals can comment as

well.

Clay Layford, 29710 Broadway Street, explained he is disappointed in the height of the previous

part. He would like the height to be lower. He also stated the landscaping hasn’t been kept up

and he wants it to add value to the area.

Motion by Erlandson, second by Burington, to table the public hearing at 6:43pm until the

July 9, 2018, Planning Commission meeting when updated information will be available.

Motion passed 7-0.


of 62

Commissioner Jim Swanberg excused himself from the Commission at 6:44pm.

2. Rose Hill

Motion by Chartrand, second by Burington, to open the public hearing for Rose Hill at

6:45pm. Motion passed 6-0.




property.

Planner Trapp explained this proposed project is an 89-unit project on 5 acres on South

Lindstrom Lake at 30355 Lehigh Ave that will provide 87 independent, assisted, and memory

care units for seniors and two cabins for short-term stays for families of residents. An 18,354

square foot commercial site will also be created and developed separately. Rezoning to PUD R-

3 and B-1, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit for a Shoreland PUD, Variances for a

Shoreland PUD, and Street and Easement Vacations are requested. The property was annexed

into the City in 2017. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed which

is mandatory and in accordance with MN Rules 4410, sub. 19a.C since there are more than 50

units in a shoreland area. After review of the findings of the EAW and the public comments and

letters from five agencies including: Minnesota Department of Administration-State

Archaeologist, Minnesota Historical Society, Department of Army-Corps of Engineers,

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the City

issued a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Rita provided a presentation of the staff findings on Rose Hill. She highlighted the following:

This area is Multi-Family Residential where the density is 6 to 20 units per acre. The proposed

development is 89 units on approximately 3.6 acres of land which equates to 25 units per acre. A

comprehensive plan amendment to modify the density range for the multi-family land use

category will be needed. A variance will be needed to allow the 89 units in the Shoreland

District. With regard to height, the maximum in this district is 35 feet. A variance to go to 46

feet is requested. Reconfiguration of Lehigh Ave is requested which include vacation of the

street, easement and a footpath. A variance is also required for a narrower roadway of 50 feet

including the right-of-way with 28’ road section width. 66 feet is required with a 32’ road

section width. Staff requested improvements to the hammerhead turnaround so that adjacent

property owners have adequate access. Staff recommended a sidewalk as there is none proposed.

Parking proposed is 83 stalls with 48 being surface and 35 underground. The proposed parking

ratio is .95. City Code 154.249 requires elderly housing needing one space per unit. Also, staff

identified reconfiguration of the East Parking Lot so that cars are not backing into the ROW.

Grading/Stormwater controls were discussed relating to the parking lots and a 10 foot retaining

wall. Open Space proposed is 60% where current code requires 50%. Impervious Surface

proposed is 39.5%. Current code allows 25%. The existing impervious surface coverage is

17.4%. Landscaping proposed includes native plants for rain gardens. Staff suggested more

native plants along the lakeshore. Tree preservation suggested by Staff is screening on the east

and west of the proposed development to soften the look for the residents. Proposed project

utilities are an improvement to the existing. Also a feasibility study for expanding utilities to

properties to the west will be completed.


of 62

Rita spelled out the 10 variances requested and went over the variance considerations. She

clarified that the two cabins are for short-term stays and that they cannot be sold separately. She

also explained the following 19 Conditions:

1. Applicant shall prepare and submit for review final construction plans for review by City

staff. The plans should conform to all local standards unless a variance is granted as a

condition of the PUD and the design requirements are identified as part of the rezoning of

the property to PUD R-3. Applicant is advised that if substantive changes are required to

the preliminary plat as a result of final construction plan development, an amendment to

one or more of the land use or subdivision approvals may be required.

2. Applicant shall apply for trail vacation for footpath on the southern portion of the

property.

3. Applicant shall apply for street and easement vacation as required for the platting of the

project.

4. Applicant shall provide a lighting plan as required by Section 154.204 of the City Code.

5. Applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include more native plantings to protect the

lakeshore. Native plantings shall be used where possible for the landscaping of the site.

Any rain gardens shall use native plants in accordance with accepted plantings from the

MnDNR.

6. Applicant shall provide a tree preservation plan in accordance with Section 157.05 (A)(2)

of the City Code.

7. Outdoor storage shall be limited to what is allowed by City Code for the R-3 District.

8. The applicant shall work with City Staff to adequately address the long-term preservation

of the cabins for resident family and guest use only.

9. Applicant is advised that the cabins may not be split from the senior living facility as

individual lots.

10. Future signs for the development must meet the requirement of Sections 154.315 to

154.333.

11. Applicant shall provide appropriate building height calculations for the proposed 87-unit

building as defined by Section 155.01 of the City Code. At this time the maximum

building height for the site is 35 feet as measured from the average grade to the midpoint

of the highest peak.

12. Low floor elevations for the cabins must be at least three feet above the ordinary high

water of the lake.

13. A phase 1 archaeological survey shall be completed before construction to uncover any

undocumented archaeological or cemetery sites on the property.

14. Wildlife-friendly erosion control methods shall be used to control erosion on the

property.

15. All conditions identified by the City Engineer in his April 19, 2018 memo shall be

addressed.


of 62

16. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits from county, state and

federal agencies. Potential permits identified through the EAW process include a sanitary

sewer extension permit, DNR Water Appropriations Permit,

17. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use and

subdivision applications.

18. The City shall record all resolutions with Chisago County. The applicant is advised that

the resolutions will not be recorded until all conditions have been met.

19. Additional conditions as identified by Staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council

through the development review process.

Chair Klun asked for any public comment from residents reiterating the 3 minute time limit.

Jim Lamond, 30553 Lehigh Ave, expressed his concerns with regard to the height of this project

and the fact that he will lose his street.

Brett Lee, 30539 Lehigh Ave, explained he lives down the hill and is concerned about erosion

and run off as soil currently washes down to his property. He also is concerned about the 28 foot

wide road that it is too narrow. He explained there is no sidewalk to get to town and with the S

curve and no sidewalk it is an accident waiting to happen. He noted disappointment in the

requested height variances. He also questioned smoking areas for guests and workers as it might

occur in property owner driveways.

Greg Duchaine, 30378 Lehigh Ave, explained his property is on the south side and doesn’t want

to look at a looming building or a 10 foot retaining wall. He also noted concern with regard to

the road right-of-way, how many people will be using the cabins, and cost the lift station as far as

who would be paying for it.

Chair Klun asked for the proposed developer to answer questions brought up so far.

Greg Johnson, Rose Hill Properties, explained that this property was purchased 2 years ago and

was annexed into the City a year ago. He noted his company has built several of these buildings

in the Twin Cities. He explained this property’s employees hours would be 15-18 employees

working during peak hours with 2-4 employees working overnight. One nurse would work from

7am to 7pm. He also explained that resident’s average age is 85 and usually live within 5 miles.

He noted his company stays in ownership after developing and they have quality construction.

As far as height, Greg noted keeping in tune with the Scandinavian heritage, but could explore a

flat roof. With regard to water runoff, Greg explained that all run off is at the same rate or

existing rate, but will be addressed. He agreed that a sidewalk could be placed around the

building, but noted bus transportation will be provided to the residents. He clarified that the

property owners who have a dead end that there will be no thru traffic. Greg agreed that

plantings on the east and west side can be placed to create a buffer for property owners. Greg

clarified the overhead lines serving the current property owners will be kept.

Engineer Jon Herdegen explained no lift station is needed for the project as it is gravity fed. Jon

also noted that the ROW needs to be preserved and that the current configuration of the parking

lot has drivers backing into the adjacent property owner’s driveway. Staff had requested

reconfiguration to address safety concerns.


of 62

Chair Klun asked if there were any more public comments.

Jessica Hedquist, 30374 Lehigh Ave, asked if the cabins could be eliminated. She explained her

concerns about the narrow turnaround, access to property, the height of the building, and heating

and cooling noise. She suggested tiering the retaining wall. She asked what kind of lighting is

proposed. She also asked if the City will have a sewer/water solution addressed before the

development occurs.

John Adams, 12035 Lindstrom Lane, expressed his concern of the height of the building that

would be in his back yard and the roadway safety such when his kids are getting on and off the

bus.

Gary Gerke, 13227 295th

Street, asked if 306th

Street could be connected to Lehigh as it has been

discussed before and it is a safety issue.

Jeanne Lamond, 30553 Lehigh Ave, questioned if the 12 stalls in the east parking lot were for

staff. She also asked about lighting in that parking lot.

Laurie Lewandosky, 12085 306th

Street, explained she is disappointed that the utilities have not

been put in as when they met twelve months ago it was indicated that it would be a part of the

project. She is also concerned about lighting, noise, and docks.

Rita explained that only one dock is listed and there hasn’t been any application for more docks.

She also noted that any changes to the number of docks would need to be publicly processed as

an amendment to the planned unit development.

Chair Klun asked for Greg to come forward to answer the questions.

Greg explained that the cabins are for family of the residents and would be low use. They are

not commercially leasing the cabins. He also informed the citizens that there will be little noise

pollution as there will be a boiler system inside the building and air conditioning will also be

inside. He explained that there will be steps taken to mitigate lighting onto the surrounding

properties.

Engineer Herdegen explained that the backing into driveways needs to be addressed as well as

storm water. He also noted a sewer feasibility study will be provided at the June City Council

meeting.

Chair Klun commented on the need to speak with the Fire Chief about the height of the building.

Klun also stated concern regarding the S curve.

Laura Lee, 30539 Lehigh Ave, commented on the traffic study that was completed stating traffic

will increase.

Brett Lee, 30539 Lehigh Ave, stated concern regarding the road width and the need for a

sidewalk to town.

Motion by Erlandson, second by Donovan, to close the public hearing for Rose Hill at

8:10pm. Motion passed 6-0.

Chair Klun asked for the Council Liaison’s input.


of 62

Council Liaison Waldoch noted adding lines to the list of conditions to include: removal of

septic systems to protect the lake, annual inspections of rain gardens, etc. He also commented

that turnarounds for semis at the loading dock was not addressed.

Council Liaison Flug commented that this is a complex development and there are many details

to process. He added that it will clean-up the area and provide a place for elderly.

Chair Klun commented on the need to see more details in order to make a decision.

Commissioner Burington noted the need for a better storm water plan and the need to see a

lighting plan.

Commissioner Donovan also stated the need to see a lighting plan and expressed turnaround

concerns.

Commissioner Chartrand expressed concern regarding the traffic at the S curve.

Commissioner Erlandson commented on the need for plantings and berms. He suggested the use

of gables to break up the size.

Commissioner Backer suggested cutting the 3rd

story to make it easier on the eye and help with

shoreland restrictions.

Chair Klun noted concerns with plantings, elevations, the need for diagrams depicting the

lighting, and the impact on neighbors.

Motion by Burington , second by Chartrand, to table Rose Hill until the July 9 Planning

Commission meeting when further details will be given by the applicant. Motion carried

6-0.

Chair Klun called for a 5 minutes recess at 8:25pm.

Chair Klun called the meeting back to order at 8:30pm.

Commissioner Jim Swanberg returned to the meeting at 8:30pm

3. Morning Sun

Motion by Swanberg, second by Donovan, to open the public hearing for Morning

Sun at 8:31pm. Motion passed 7-0.




property.

Moxness Development Group submitted land use and subdivision requests for a portion of the

Morning Sun Planned Unit Development that was previously approved in 2005. The applicant is

proposing to reduce the overall density of this portion of the original plat. Rita explained that

this proposed development is in line with the Comprehensive Plan with regard to density as 1 to

6 units per acre is required and 52 detached, small-lot single family homes on approximately 15

acres along County Road 14 are proposed which has a density of 3.54 units per acre. The

proposed development involves a rezoning the current R-3 to R-2. The proposed single-family

lots would have a minimum size of 6,500 square feet. There will be a berm on the south side in


of 62

order to inhibit the noise and sight of County Road 14. Also proposed are sidewalks and trails

and an easement for a trail on the northwest side near County Road 14. The applicant is also

proposing a right of way of 55’ wide with a road width of 29’ with parking recommended on one

side of the street.

Rita explained the 7 Findings of Fact and 17 Conditions.

Findings of Fact:

1. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan.

2. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the design standards and other

requirements of Chapter 154 (Zoning) of the Code.

3. The proposed development will not have a negative fiscal or environmental impact upon

the city as the developer is responsible for all improvements proposed and has designed

the utilities and stormwater management system in accordance with City specifications.

4. The proposed modifications to the Morning Sun Planned Unit Development are

consistent with the original purpose of the PUD.

5. The proposed development will provide new opportunities for life-cycle housing in

Lindstrom.

6. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts and access by

completing the originally envisioned street system, providing a connection for future

development, and providing a trail that twill in the future connect to the larger

community.

7. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare

of the community.

Conditions:

1. On the Existing Conditions & Removal Plan (sheet 3 of 13), include the following:

a. Right-of-way widths and public lands within 100 feet of the project per

153.027(G)(4).

b. Boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided or divided land, within 100 feet,

identified by name and ownership per 153.027(G)(6).

c. Topographic data, including contours at intervals of not more than 5 feet per

153.027(G)(7).

2. The name of the street currently labeled Street A shall be proposed and approved by City

Staff.

3. On the Preliminary Site Plan (sheet 5 of 13), please indicate how Street A is to end at the

property boundary.

4. Applicant shall modify plans as needed to comply with City Engineer requirements

pertaining to surface water runoff and drainage. The applicant shall consider the

following:


of 62

a. Modifying so stormwater lines for Block 2 so that they can be out of yards and in

the rear public property.

b. Modifying so stormwater lines on Block 3 are within the drainage and utility

easement.

c. Exploring whether lots 44-51 be graded in such a way as to eliminate back yard

storm sewer.

d. Ensure all catch basins are specified to be pinned to the curb and manholes cut to

allow for expansion.

e. Adding documentation and signage to lots 29, 30, 50, and 51 so property owners

know about the presence of stormwater lines.

5. Verify the location of existing sanitary sewer lines in the portion of the street proposed to

be vacated.

6. The preliminary erosion control plan should include a rock construction access on north

Newport Curve.

7. Address how decks will be provided on lots 15, 22, 23, and 24 given the lots triangular

shape.

8. Move or remove the 20 foot dimensions shown on lots 39 and 49.

9. Prohibit on-street parking on one side of Newport Curve and Street A.

10. Adjust driveway locations on one side of Newport Curve and Street A to maximize on-

street parking. Modify noted on-street parking locations and count to accurately reflect

driveway locations.

11. Move the trail entrance away from the existing house to the north and show screening.

12. Identify that the trail around the pond shall be woodchip or lime rock until the City paves

it.

13. Modify the sidewalks and trails to reflect the direction of the Planning Commission.

14. Provide pedestrian ramps at all intersections.

15. Work with the City to provide as many front yard trees as possible.

16. Applicant should verify compliance with setback from road right-of-way for tree planting

on corner lots per 153.028(Q)(2).

17. Preserve as many of the existing trees along CR14 as possible.

Chair Klun asked for public comment.

Mark Vanderwerf, 31758 Newport Curve, stated the trail to too close to the pond and his

home. He suggested an 8 foot wide path. He also asked if the Cottonwood and Willow trees

that are currently near or in the pond be taken out.

Kevin Stakowsky, 31769 Lincoln Road, stated the houses that are proposed are too close.

There are no yards. He suggested keeping the development the way it was going to be.


of 62

Cindy Farrell, 31990 Lincoln Road, expressed storm drainage concerns as the water drains

into the back of her property.

Engineer Herdegen explained that the storm water will not have more volume or a faster rate.

Caroline Bengtson, 31840 Morning Trail, asked that the developer pay for the Home Owners

Association update.

Tim Peterson, 31570 Lincoln Road, explained he lives across County Road 14 and is

concerned about the gravel and sand that are in the pond going into the aquafer. He

suggested placing a layer in the pond to protect the drinking water.

Jesse Moxness, Moxness Development, explained that the trail was asked for by the City. He

noted that removal of the trees near the pond is possible. Jesse informed the residents that

they have requests for housing such as this. He has built housing like this in Cambridge and

Lino Lakes that are slab on grade with no step. Jesse explained the market for this housing is

1st time home buyer just starting out and empty nesters who want to down size. He noted

driveway reconfiguration is possible. He explained that there is sheet rock on common walls

to prevent fires. Jesse noted the size of the pond will be enlarged to assist with drainage. He

also will look at addressing the comment regarding the aquafer.

Engineer Herdegen commented that the developer works with the City regarding pond

maintenance.

Commissioner Chartrand expressed concern about the street width and parking.

Rita noted each home will have a 2 car garage and 2 parking spots in front of the garage.

Mark VanOrf, 31758 Newport Curve, asked the Commission to consider not having a trail.

Jason Aarnio, 31741 Marshview Court, commented that there are plenty of sidewalks and

trails in this development and he is not in favor of a trail around the pond.

Administrator Olinger explained that the trail assists with connectivity and provides a loop

through a natural environment rather than a sidewalk.

Rita explained the City identified a need in its Comprehensive Plan for residents to be able to

walk and ride bike safely.

Motion by Erlandson, second by Swanberg, to close the public hearing for Morning

Sun at 9:05pm. Motion passed 7-0.

Council Liaison Waldoch expressed the need for all driveways to be 25 feet. He also noted the

corner lots need extra side yard setbacks as there is less visibility and it is a safety issue.

Council Liaison Flug explained he understands the need for smaller properties. He agrees with

Commissioner Chartrand on the parking issue.

Chair Klun went over each of the variations of the proposed development with the Planning

Commission.


of 62

Motion by Burington, second by Swanberg, to recommend approval of Morning Sun, 2nd

Addition with the conditions and findings of fact as presented by Staff. Motion passed 7-0.

4. Code Amendment

Motion by Donovan, second by Swanberg, to open the public hearing for the City Code

Amendment at 9:45pm. Motion passed 7-0.




property.

Rita explained that after review of the recent zoning amendment and conditional use permit

requested that the approval process for these currently requires passage by a two-thirds vote of

all member of the City Council. This requirement in the City Code violates Minn. Stat. 462.357

subd. 2. The current statute reduces the necessary voting majority from two-thirds to a simple

majority. The City Attorney advises that a two-thirds vote of all members of the City Council is

not advisable.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Backer, to close the public hearing for the City Code

Amendment at 9:50pm. Motion passed 7-0.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Backer, to recommend approval of the City Code

Amendment to Section 154.389 to allow approval of zoning amendments and conditional

use permits by the voting requirements established in statute. Motion passed 7-0.

Miscellaneous: Rita introduced her assistant, Beth, to the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT:

Motion by Klun, second by Donovan, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Motion

passed 7-0.

Respectfully Submitted,

Melissa Glenna,

Deputy Clerk


of 62

MINUTES

CITY OF LINDSTROM


MONDAY, JUNE 11, 2018

6:30P.M.

Lindstrom Council Chambers



Chair Klun called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

CALL OF ROLL:

Members Present: Chair Mike Klun; Commissioners Jim Swanberg, Kevin Backer,

Orris Erlandson, Laurie Burington, Judy Chartrand, Greg Donovan

Members Absent: None

Others Present: City Administrator John Olinger, Deputy Clerk Melissa Glenna;

Council Liaisons Curt Flug & Dave Waldoch; City Planner Rita

Trapp; Denise Martin Chisago County Press, Brian Farrell

(Northland Real Estate Group), Darren Lazan (Landform), Link

Wilson (Kaas Wilson Architects), Juliann Wilcox, Brad Wilcox,

Wayne Johnson, Scott Sellman, AnnMarie Brink, Brian Farrell,

Sonja & Jeff Fink, John and Shirley Olander, Justin Kroeger,

Sidney Silko, Cathy Wimmer, John Haselbeck, John Eret, George

Novak, Paul Coleman, John Nelson, Ed Muha, Deannah, Muha,

Peter Linberg, Tom Einercher, Nancy Mergens, Jenni Runte, Mark

Coolombe, Kevin Stenson, Mary Shaughnessy, Joe Shaughnessy,

Marcia Smith, Pat Smith, Mary Kay Campbell, Brian & Teri

Phyle, Rick Moore, Elizabeth Moore, Diane John, Gary Gerke,

Rick Skare, Bob Cedergren, Susan Wilson, Tom Wilson, Colleen

Charles, Mary Sauer, Brian Richter, Becky Fredell, Dana Turman,

Carla Norelius, Linda Radich, Chris Dahlberg, Steve Dahlberg.


Motion by Chartrand, second by Burington, to approve the agenda with deletion of

consideration of the minutes. Motion passed 7-0.


5. Northland/Meredees


of 62

Planner Rita Trapp gave an overview of the role of the Planning Commission as an advisory

body that is comprised of residents that live in the City. Their job is to review the proposed

projects, listen to residents’ concerns, and make recommendations to the Council. Rita clarified

that the ultimate decisions are made by the Council. Another task of the Planning Commission is

to review and adopt the Comprehensive Plan which is the guiding document of the City into the

future. Rita explained that the current proposed development is market driven and the City is

reacting to that. Rita also noted the steps of the public hearing process.

Motion by Donovan, second by Swanberg, to open the Public Hearing for

Northland/Meredees at 6:40pm. Motion passed 7-0.


, May 31st and June 7

th editions of the

Chisago County Press, and it was mailed to all property owners located within 350’ of the

subject property.

Planner Rita Trapp gave an overview of the proposed development that Northland Real Estate

Group has submitted, which includes construction of a three-story apartment complex with 102

units, a restaurant, underground parking, and a dock system. The units will consist of 30 studios,

46 one bedrooms, 7 one bedrooms plus den, and 19 two bedrooms on 2.6 acres. Also included

are a fitness area, community room, and an office/conference space. A rooftop deck and a

clubhouse will be located on the third level. The applicant submitted multiple land use and

subdivision applications including preliminary plat, rezoning of the property to PUD,

comprehensive plan amendment, conditional use permit for a PUD in the shoreland district,

variances, and vacation of existing easements for a 2.6 acre mixed-use development located

along Highway 8 just east of South Lindstrom Lake. A mandatory Environmental Assessment

Worksheet (EAW) was completed in accordance with MN Rules 4410, sub. 19a.C since there are

more than 50 units in a shoreland area. After review of the findings of the EAW and the public

comments and letters from five agencies including: Minnesota Department of Administration-

State Archaeologist, Minnesota Historical Society, Department of Army-Corps of Engineers,

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the City

issued a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Rita provided a presentation of the staff findings on Northland. She highlighted the following:

This site is made up of 3 parcels. The parcel furthest north is currently zoned B-2 General

Business with the two parcels to the south zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The applicant

applied to rezone the entire property to a PUD. Rita explained that staff is recommending that

the City use the PUD Mixed classification as the PUD includes both residential and commercial.

She noted that in the Comprehensive Plan the site is guided by Central Business District which

has a mix of uses. Rita stated the proposed 102 apartments has a density of 39 units per acre.

Currently, the density for this area is 6 to 30 units per acre. She explained a Comprehensive Plan

Amendment to 40 units per acre is requested. The setback of the building and patio to the lake

must be at least 50 feet. The applicant has requested a building height variance of 10 feet to

allow a 45-foot building. The current code allows a 35-foot building. Since the project is in the

shoreland district, the shoreland regulations require the project be divided into tiers to consider

density levels. Currently, 7 units are allowed if the residential component was considered. A

variance is required to allow more density in the shoreland district. The City Code 154.202


of 62

requires 50% of the project area must be open space. A variance for open space will be required

as the open space will be 32.9%. City Code 154.221(F)(8) states that there is no impervious

surface maximum for the City’s business districts as long as there is no increase in surface water

discharge or if all discharges are accommodating by a surface water management system or

program approved by the City. The City Engineer will work with the applicant to meet this

requirement. No new streets are proposed as a part of this project. The applicant is responsible

for communicating with MnDOT regarding access to the site from Highway 8. The restaurant

access on Highway 8 will be right-in and right-out only. A 10’ wide right turn lane on eastbound

Highway 8 leading into the restaurant is proposed to be added to decrease possible congestion

due to the development. The apartment complex will use Bronson Avenue and Vine Street. A

Traffic Impact Study was submitted and it was found that the streets have the capacity to handle

the added volume; however, it is subject to MnDOT approval. Parking required for multiple-

family dwellings is one and one-half parking spaces per unit with one-half needing to be in an

enclosed garage. The requirements also state that restaurants should provide one space per 80 sf

of kitchen area and one space per 40 sf of the gross floor area of the dining and bar area. The

restaurant proposes to be 40% of the space occupied by the kitchen and 60% occupied by the

dining area. A sidewalk along the east side of the property connecting the Highway 8 trail to the

existing sidewalk network on Bronson and Vine is proposed. A large floating dock with 16 slips

that is currently a CUP will be used by apartment residents and restaurant patrons. Landscaping

proposed is to be native plantings along the shoreline.

Rita then summarized the following variances requested:

1. A variance to the height of the building, allowing the building to reach a height of 45’

instead of the required 35’.

2. A variance to the parking requirements for apartment parking. Per normal calculations,

153 stalls are required for 102 units. The applicant is requesting to build 129 dedicated

residential stalls.

3. A variance to the parking requirements for commercial parking. Applicant is required to

provide 87 stalls and is requesting to provide 49.

4. A variance to allow an open space amount of 32% instead of the required 50%.

5. A variance to shoreland density tiering requirements that would allow a multi-family

apartment building and restaurant.

Brian Farrell, Northland Real Estate Group President, spoke about the need for housing and

dining on the lake in the City of Lindstrom.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, explained he is attached to the community as he played

hockey and fished here. He noted the need for market rate life cycle housing for empty nesters

wanting to downsize and professionals wanting to work and stay in Lindstrom. He commented

that the redevelopment would invigorate the downtown and connect to the lakes. He stated it is a

tremendous opportunity for a successful downtown.


of 62

Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, explained the proposed development architecture will

mold with the architecture of the town. It also is a lifestyle choice with no mowing or shoveling.

Link gave a slide show of the amenities that will be included for the apartment residents.

Chair Klun asked for any public comment from residents reiterating the 3 minute time limit.

Justin Kreger, 12590 Newell Avenue, commented that Lindstrom is not Savage or St. Paul and

that he does not want this monstrosity. He moved to Lindstrom because of its charm. It will be

4 stories high from the water. He stated he is not ok with the density, size and scale of this

project.

Jenni Runte, 30825 Irene Avenue, stated affordable housing is needed. She asked what the

community reinvestment would be and how many jobs this would bring.

Wayne Johnson, 12550 Newell Avenue, explained the traffic trips are way off and two parking

spaces are needed per unit. He also noted the building needs to be 100 feet from his house.

Mary Kay Campbell, 12770 Newell Avenue, explained she owns Dirty Dawgs Pet Grooming.

She shared concern about traffic and pedestrians on Newell Avenue. It is hard to see with

parking on both sides of the street. She also stated this is not Minnetonka and does not want this

amount of density.

Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, responded to comments stating that it is not unusual to

have variances within a shoreland project. He also noted that the project meets the all the

setback requirements of the Central Business District. He stated that this is a market rate project

that will provide higher level apartments to provide life cycle housing.

Jeff Fink, 30582 Moonlight Bay Court, explained that the channel is not being controlled by

police currently and will get worse with added boaters. He also noted that the shoreland is

eroding and will erode more with this development.

John Eret, Chisago Lindstrom Lake Association, noted his biggest concern is water quality

impacts and the lake shore esthetics through the channel.

Margaret LeVasseur, 12915 Pleasant Avenue, noted that the architecture does not align with the

charm of the town and one car per unit is underestimated. She asked if the traffic of visitors was

considered.

Brad Wilcox, 12655 Newell Avenue, stated he’s lived here for 33 years and loves this small

town. He noted he is not against development. He explained replacing 5 units with 102 is out of

place.

Blaine Norelius, 12865 Pleasant Avenue, commented this is the wrong project in the wrong

place. He noted that other projects would be acceptable.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, explained the water quality will be improved as they will

have an underground system that will be well-maintained. He noted that parking per unit is

different from community to community. He also explained that the dock with 16 slips will not

change.

Brian Farrell, Northland Real Estate Group, noted that the proposed development contains more

1 bedrooms and studio apartments to provide more affordability.


of 62

Elizabeth Moore, 12545 Newell Avenue, stated this business does not know Lindstrom.

Lindstrom has a small town atmosphere.

Rick Moore, 12545 Newell Avenue, explained this project has high density and is hideous. It

will ruin the skyline by covering up the view of the tea pot. He also noted this would add to the

traffic backup to Brinks every Saturday and the parking problems already on Newell, Bronson,

and Vine.

Joe Shaughnessy, 12605 Newell Avenue, also commented that this is not Savage or Minneapolis.

He explained empty nesters are buying townhouses. He asked what happens if there is only 30%

occupancy in one year.

Brian Phyle, 12619 Bronson Avenue, noted the design doesn’t fit with the Swedish design. The

project is bringing Roseville to this area.

Dana Turman, 30690 Maple Street, asked what tax implications are for the City, the capacity of

sewer and water, and impacts to fire and police. He also asked about public access to the beach.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, explained the proposed development complements the

Comprehensive Plan by having multiple uses in the Central Business District with a connection

to trails and providing dining. He noted that there have been adjustments to the building from a

4 story down to a 3 story. He noted police and fire will be considered. There will be semi-public

access to the marina. There is no beach proposed.

Colleen Charles, 30576 Moonlight Bay Court, shared concern regarding the roof top deck, noise

and the lighting of the proposed development. She explained that channel traffic is an issue now

with kayaks and boaters.

Sonja Fink, 30582 Moonlight Bay Court, also shared concern regarding the roof top deck and

noise. She noted the size is not for this town.

Jenni Runte, 30825 Irene Avenue, asked where the snow will go, what is the commitment to

community reinvestment, how the tenant parking issue will be resolved, and if there will be any

renewable energy such as solar.

Wayne Johnson, 12550 Newell Avenue, spoke again explaining the traffic trips will be 612 per

day. He also asked how the storm water will be treated.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, noted the lighting requirements will be met with LED

lighting. He explained the roof top deck will be on the first floor and will be private. He

clarified the storm water will comply with today’s high standards. He noted nothing is there

today to manage stormwater on the site. He explained snow storage will be addressed. He noted

consideration of renewable energy.

Motion by Donovan, second by Backer, to close the Public Hearing for

Northland/Meredees at 9:05pm. Motion passed 7-0.

Chair Klun called for a 5 minutes break.

Chair Klun reconvened the meeting at 9:14pm.

Council Liaison Flug commented that he supports the Planning Commission. MnDOT will need

to provide their input.


of 62

Council Liaison Waldoch questioned whether Bronson will maintain angle parking and if the

parking lot on Bronson will be for residents and the restaurant. He noted the need for a

maintenance plan for the shoreline vegetation. He asked if there will be storage lockers for the

units. He asked how many dogs will be allowed and how waste will be controlled. He

questioned the retaining wall heights.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, noted that the traffic pattern on Bronson will stay the same

but will the traffic count will be increased. He commented that the streets are adequate to handle

the amount of traffic increase. Storage lockers will be provided to the apartment residents. He

explained that the parking on the eastern lot could be used for both residents and customers. The

dog waste is managed by the building management and fines are given.

Commissioner Burington questioned what is public and what is not public with regard to

parking.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, clarified that the underground lot will be assigned, the

western lot is commercial, and the eastern lot is residential and unassigned.

Commissioner Donovan asked for clarification on the 45 foot height.

Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, explained 45 feet to the midpoint on the west side facing

the lake and 32 feet to the eave on the east side.

Commissioner Chartrand expressed the need to clear-up the traffic issues on Bronson, Vine, and

Newell.

Engineer Herdegen clarified 732 total trips, 600 cars per day on Newell, 320 of 732 on Highway

8, 412 cars to local streets Linden and Bronson and Linden and Highway 8. 973 projected

volume.

Chair Klun asked about utility traffic with regard to loading and unloading food trucks and

garbage hauling.

Commissioner Backer commented on the need to set limits on impervious surface. He also

questioned the zoning with reference to City Code 154.201 and PUD uses.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, explained with regard to stormwater there will be limited

discharge, rate control, and infiltration.

Planner Trapp clarified that in City Code 154.201 with regard to PUDs, the underlying district is

Central Business District and B-2 where apartments are allowed. She also noted stormwater will

be an improvement to today’s existing conditions.

Commissioner Swanberg asked what elevation is the bottom of the lowest retaining wall.

Patrick Sarver, Civil Site Group, answered the Ordinary High Water (OHW) 900.2.

Chair Klun explained the Planning Commission makes decisions based on facts and the

Comprehensive Plan.

Rita went over the following conditions that are recommended to be required with any

recommendation for approval:


of 62

20. All conditions identified by the City Engineer in his June 5, 2018 memo shall be

addressed.

21. Applicant shall provide revised building height calculations for the project.

22. Applicant shall provide a shoreland tiering exhibit that addresses the requirements of the

Shoreland District regulations.

23. Applicant shall provide a lighting plan as required by Section 154.204 of the City Code.

24. Applicant shall provide a tree preservation plan in accordance with Section 157.05 (A)(2)

of the City Code.

25. A vegetative buffer or fence shall be provided between the uses of the proposed side and

the adjacent residential properties.

26. The applicant shall only perform work during the hours of 7am and 10pm and shall

comply with all MPCA noise regulations.

27. Sidewalks shall be 5’ in width and shall utilize ADA-approved truncated domes at

intersections.

28. Applicant shall be responsible from securing from the MnDNR permitting related to the

proposed docks.

29. Applicant shall obtain an aquatic plant management control permit from the Minnesota

DNR to control aquatic weeds in the slip areas of the dock system.

30. Applicant shall be responsible for consulting with the MnDNR regarding planting along

the lakeshore as was stipulated in the EAW Record of Decision. As identified through the

EAW process, native plantings shall be used where possible for the landscaping of the

site and wildlife-friendly erosion control methods shall be used to control erosion on the

property.

31. Monitoring and signage for Blanding’s turtle must be provided during construction.

32. Applicant shall have an environmental scientist on site during initial construction to

confirm that no contaminated soils are encountered during the excavation phase of the

project.

33. As required under Minnesota’s Private Cemeteries Act, the applicant shall be responsible

for consulting with the Office of the State Archaeologist and the Minnesota Indian

Affairs Council prior to any earthmoving on this project.

34. Future signs for the development must meet the requirement of Sections 154.315 to

154.333.

35. Low floor elevations for all parts of the structure must be at least three feet above the

ordinary high water of the lake.

36. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits from county, state and

federal agencies.

37. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use and

subdivision applications.


of 62

38. The City shall record all resolutions with Chisago County. The applicant is advised that

the resolutions will not be recorded until all conditions have been met.

39. Additional conditions as identified by Staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council

through the development review process.

Rita then asked the Planning Commissioners if they are in need of any more information in order

to make a decision.

Commissioner Chartrand shared concern regarding traffic patterns and the amount of variances

requested.

Chair Klun commented the increased traffic that Newell will experience cannot be shortsighted.

He also noted that in the Comprehensive Plan the Central Business District runs along Highway

8 to Olinda.

Rita listed the site plan variances as including height, parking, open space, and shoreland density.

Commissioner Erlandson stated he likes the look and design of the proposed development, but it

is too large for the site. He suggested the developers downsize the project which would help

with the parking issue. He also noted concern about the cost versus the rental pricing.

Commissioner Swanberg also noted concern regarding the rent.

Chair Klun also noted the height of the building, but stated that apartments would be adding to

the community.

Commissioner Chartrand explained the proposed building is too big for the site and does not fit

in with the Comprehensive Plan for our small town.

Commissioner Donovan commented on the large size of the building but is in favor of it.

Commissioner Backer expressed the need for the building to fit in our current City Code.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, clarified that with the current City Code in the shoreland

district any development that has more than 7 units would need a variance.

Planner Rita Trapp asked for clarification from the Planning Commission as to what needs to be

different such as the parking number, the height lowered, and traffic addressed.

Darren Lazan, Landform President, suggested the Planning Commission consider what they can

approve and what they cannot live with.

Rita directed the Planning Commission to vote on each of the following: Comprehensive Plan

Amendment, Rezoning to PUD, Easement, Preliminary Plat, CUP, Variances.

Motion by Erlandson, second by Chartrand, to deny modification of the Comprehensive

Plan Amendment in the Central Business District to a maximum of 40 units per acre.

Motion passed 4-3 Klun, Swanberg, Donovan opposed.

Commissioner Burington stated she misunderstood the motion.

Motion by Klun, second by Swanberg, to reconsider the previous motion. Motion passed 7-

0.


of 62

Motion by Erlandson, second by Chartrand, to deny modification of the Comprehensive


Motion failed 3-4 Klun, Swanberg, Donovan, Burington opposed.

Motion by Donovan, second by Swanberg, to approve modification of the Comprehensive


Motion passed 4-3 Backer, Chartrand, Erlandson opposed.

Motion by Donovan, second by Swanberg, to approve rezoning to PUD Mixed with 20

conditions adding 2 more conditions: bicycle parking and maintenance for stormwater.

Motion passed 4-3 Backer, Chartrand, Erlandson opposed.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Donovan, to approve the easement vacation. Motion

passed 7-0.

Motion by Donovan, second by Burington, to approve the Preliminary Plat that meets the

City Engineer’s recommendations. Discussion regarding creating a lot with the two added

homes. Motion passed 7-0.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Donovan, to approve the Conditional Use Permit with 20

conditions adding 2 more conditions: bicycle parking and maintenance for stormwater.

Motion passed 4-2 Chartrand and Backer opposed, Erlandson abstained.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Donovan, to approve maximum building height variance

up to 45 feet. Motion passed 6-1 Chartrand opposed.

Motion by Donovan, second by Burington, to approve 32% open space. Motion passed 6-1

Chartrand opposed.

Motion by Erlandson, second by Donovan, to approve the shoreland tiering. Motion

passed 7-0.

Motion by Swanberg, second by Donovan, to approve 130 dedicated parking stalls with 34

of them being shared. Motion passed 6-1 Backer opposed.

Motion by Donovan, second by Swanberg, to approve commercial parking of 49 stalls.

Motion passed 6-1 Backer opposed.

Rita asked for clarification from the Planning Commission as to the “why’s” of how they voted.

Commissioner Donovan explained the building could be sized down, but he is in favor of

different life cycle housing options and a restaurant that would bring people together.

Chair Klun commented that the development contains smaller units and would provide housing

that is needed.

Commissioner Backer noted that the residential properties values would increase.

Commissioner Swanberg commented the development would help the downtown.

Commissioner Burington stated she likes the location as it would be close to the clinic and

pharmacy. She shared concern regarding parking and height.


of 62

Miscellaneous: None.

ADJOURNMENT:

Motion by Erlandson, second by Donovan, to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 p.m.

Motion passed 7-0.

Respectfully Submitted,

Melissa Glenna,

Deputy Clerk


of 62


of 62

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: July 9, 2018

SUBMITTED BY: City Administrator Olinger

ITEM: Pervious Pavers – Impervious Surface Limits

The Shoreland Ordinance places a 25% impervious surface restriction on properties within 1,000

feet of a DNR designated water body. Additionally, the City placed a 50% impervious surface

limit on properties outside of the Shoreland District.

City Staff have received numerous requests for pervious pavers to allow for construction on

some of our smaller shoreland lots. To date, City Staff have not found any options that appear

viable. The options presented have been pervious asphalt, pervious pavers, concrete strips, and

gravel/class 5/rock driveways. Here is a review of these products.

Pervious/porous asphalt and Pervious Pavers, (Waters Edge Condos) have an underground

basin and small openings in the asphalt or paver to allow water to permeate through the asphalt

or paver to the basin where water slowly infiltrates, excess water runs off. These holes tend to

fill up over time and need to be vacuumed. For a commercial entity that may be doable but we

do not believe that is viable for a residential use. Gravel/rock/class 5 (many residences in

Lindstrom), is not allowed in the City and overtime pack down and become like concrete or

asphalt and spread mud into our street that gets into our catch basins. Concrete strips, (Newell

Avenue) are fine if the driveway is straight and there are no turning movements. But, they are

hard to shovel or snow blow in winter off the concrete pads.

Our intent is to provide an option that mimics grass with a pervious material. However, even

grass has a saturation point. Therefore, the desire is to provide an

option that serves as well as grass or better that can be driven on,

maintained in winter, does not spread into our streets and does not

have high maintenance costs.

Options that have historical roots and may, under certain conditions

work are; concrete pavers, (Park Street) but a new twist is Presto

Geo Block and Geo Pave. Concrete pavers have been around for a

long time. They sit on an aggregate base and are 3” high with holes

filled with soil to grow grass or filled with a larger aggregate. The

Geo Block and Geo Pave work on the same principal but with

recycled plastic. thatthat One product allows grass to be grown and one

uses aggregate. The intent of these three options is to provide a

strong base that can support vehicles, yet allow percolation of Stormwater into the underlying

soil.


of 62

My question is if the subbase and concrete paver, Geo Block or Geo Paver will imitate grass

closely enough for us to consider them pervious. For more information view videos and

brochures. https://www.prestogeo.com/design/porous-pavements/

ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To consider allowing pervious concrete pavers, or a

system similar to Presto Geo Block and Geo Pavers for driveway and sidewalk applications

https://www.prestogeo.com/design/porous-pavements/


of 62


of 62

Concrete Strips, Newell Avenue


of 62

Gravel/Class 5/Rock, Newell Avenue


of 62

Concrete Pavers, Park Street North


of 62


of 62

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: July 9, 2018 SUBMITTED BY: Administrator Olinger ITEM: 2018 Development Updates

Rosehill Resort-July Planning

Meredees/Northland-July 10, City Council

Sunset Meadows-Staff/Developer meeting

Morning Sun-Under construction

Lakes Region EMS Facility-July 19, City Council meeting

Enchanted Cove-Vacate Xcel easement, complete conditions

Sherman Plat-Under construction

Chisago Lakes High School Community Center- Under construction

CSAH 20 Bridge Replacement-Complete, bridge open July 9

Middle School Tennis Courts-Complete

288th Street- First lift of pavement and trail complete

Lindstrom Commons-July 19, City Council meeting

Lindstrom Mini Storage-Under construction


of 62

Smith Metal Products-Under construction

Handicapped Veterans Housing-Plat with two lots set for consideration at

the July 19, City Council meeting.

Golf Course Townhomes-Awaiting Concept Plan application

Kirvida Mini-storage-Awaiting Conditional Use Permit application

Downtown Electrical Undergrounding-Need releases signed by downtown

building owners

Plastic Products Headquarters renovations and parking lot-Under

construction

ACTION TO BE TAKEN: No action

AGENDA CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING COMMISSION … · 2020-07-07 · CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING...

Documents

Transcript of AGENDA CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING COMMISSION … · 2020-07-07 · CITY OF LINDSTROM PLANNING...