Age and Sex of Population Income Education Performance of Criminal Justice System.

36
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of Age and Sex of Population Income Education Performance of Criminal Justice System.

Age and Sex of Population

Income

Education

Performance of Criminal Justice System

Age and Sex of Population

No significant changes over time

Increases/Decreases in crime not mirrored by changes in young male population

Ratio of males to females similar to rest of California

Income

Personal Income 1990/1998

05.000

10.00015.00020.00025.00030.00035.00040.00045.00050.000

Kin

gs

Imp

erial

Me

rced

Tu

lare

Ke

rn San

Be

rnard

ino

FRES

NO

San

Joaq

uin

S

tanis

laus

Rive

rsid

e

San

Lu

isO

bis

po

Sacram

en

to

Lo

sA

ng

ele

s

San

Die

go

Mo

nte

rey

San

taB

arbara

Ve

ntu

ra

So

no

ma

San

ta Cru

z

Alam

ed

a

Oran

ge

Co

ntra

Co

sta

San

ta Clara

San

Mate

o

San

Francis

co

1990 1998

Low but not lowest

Education

Low but not poorest level in Central Valley

Violent Offenses

Automobile Thefts

Gang Activity

Violent Offenses

Fresno County Violent Crime

0.00

500.00

1,000.00

1,500.00

2,000.00

Y 1

991

Y 1

992

Y 199

3

Y 199

4

Y 199

5

Y 199

6

Y 199

7

Y 199

8

Y 199

9

Y 200

0

1999 California Crime Index without Motor Vehicle Theft

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

1999 California Crime Index without MV Theft & Aggr. Assault

0200400600800

100012001400

Cal. Crime Index-Fresno County Cities

01000200030004000500060007000

Clo

vis

Co

alin

ga

Fire

ba

ug

h

Fo

wle

r

Fre

sn

o

Hu

ron

Ke

rma

n

Kin

gs

bu

rg

Re

ed

ley

Sa

ng

er

Se

lma

19951996199719981999

California Crime Index 1999-Selected Cities

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

Automobile Thefts

Motor Vehicle Theft Rate1990-1999

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Fresn

o

Kern

Lo

sA

ng

eles

Merced

San

Dieg

o

Stan

islaus

Tulare

Califo

rnia

Units 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Gang Activity

Law Enforcement

Courts

Corrections

Violent Felony and Felony Assault Arrest Rates-Fresno County

0

200

400

600

800

1000

198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999

violfelarr Fasslt

1999 Comparison of Adult Felony Arrests Rates for Weapons Offenses

020406080

Sa

n M

ate

o

Sa

nta

Cla

ra

Sa

n L

uis O

bisp

o

Ora

ng

e

Kin

gs

Sa

n D

ieg

oF

RE

SN

OP

lace

r L

os A

ng

ele

s V

en

tura

S

on

om

a

So

lan

o

Sa

nta

Cru

z S

an

Joa

qu

in

Bu

tteM

on

tere

y C

on

tra C

osta

S

an

Fra

ncisco

R

iversid

e

Ala

me

da

T

ula

re

Sa

cram

en

to

Sa

n B

ern

ard

ino

K

ern

Sta

nisla

us

Sh

asta

Me

rced

1999-Comparison of Juvenile Felony Arrest Rates for Weapons Offenses

05

101520253035

Sa

n Fran

cisco

Sa

n Lu

is ...C

on

tra C

osta

A

lame

da

S

anta

Ba

rbara

S

an M

ate

o

Sa

cram

en

toO

ran

ge

F

RE

SN

OP

lacer

Lo

s An

gele

sV

entu

ra

So

lan

o S

ono

ma

Rive

rside

Tu

lare

Sh

asta B

utte

K

ings

Sa

n Be

rna

rdin

o M

onte

reyS

an D

ieg

o

Sta

nislau

s K

ern

S

anta

Clara

Sa

nta C

ruz

Sa

n Joaq

uin M

erced

Fresno County-Juvenile arrest ratefor violent felonies

0

50

100

150

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

Juvenile Motor Vehicle Theft Arrest Rate-1994

0

50

100

150

200

250

Arrests as percentage of total reported Motor Vehicle Thefts -1999

05

10152025303540

Central Valley counties surrounding Fresno county have similar demographics but a consistently lower California Index Crime rates compared to Fresno County. What is notable about the differences, however, is that the rate of California Index crimes for Fresno County had the steepest decline of any central valley county. A review of crime rates from 1990-1999, shows Fresno County with a 54% decline in Index Crimes from the highest rate in 1992. Much smaller Madera County experienced a decline of 52% in 1999, compared to its highest year of 1995, and in Stanislaus County, the county with the next highest drop in Index Crimes, the 1999 data shows a difference of 34% compared to its highest year of 1993. Fresno County Index Crimes dropped every subsequent year beginning with1992 and ending in 1999. There were no significant demographic changes in Fresno County during the time period when compared to other central valley counties. The disproportionate differences in the drop of crime rates in Fresno County may be associated with criminal justice activity, including personnel increases in the City of Fresno Police Department, the city with the highest crime rates in the county, and the creation of special units to address gang activity, auto theft and related offenses.

Fresno County-New Admissions to the CDC

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

1,400

Adm.1997 Adm.1998 Adm. 1999 Adm. 2000

Probation Officer Caseloads 1999(Misdemeanor/Felony combined)

020406080

100120140160

Adult Felony Probation Caseloads-1999

01020304050607080

Percent Adult Felony Case Dismissals-1998

010203040

  1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

Sacramento 20.8 19.3 18.8 18.7 17.9 20.7 11.4 4.6 16.6

Tulare 11.3 9.9 7.7 6.2 5.9 4.2 3.8 5.2 5.1

Contra Costa 15.4 14.1 12.2 10.5 9.7 8.5 10.3 9 9.9

Los Angeles 10.8 10.9 10.8 10.7 11.5 11.2 9.3 9.4 9.6

San Diego 11.4 10.7 10.8 9.4 10.2 10 9.3 9.7 9.8

Monterey 15.7 16.3 14.3 12.2 15 12.1 11 10.1 10.2

Orange 11.5 11 10 8.1 7.8 6.9 8.5 11.7 11.4

Kern 11.5 9.8 10.5 9.7 10.7 10.3 13.5 13.4 14.7

San Joaquin 15.9 15.3 13.9 11.7 13.3 18 17.3 15.9 16.2

Stanislaus 21.2 19 17.6 15.8 16.6 13.8 10.7 16.8 18.4

Kings 17 13.7 16.5 13.1 16.7 19.1 14.5 19.2 24.9

Merced 9.4 9.2 8.6 9.9 11.1 15.6 20.3 22.2 19.4

San Francisco 12.5 13.1 16.4 15.7 16.5 22.2 25 28.5 24.1

FRESNO 23.1 21.9 21.5 19.5 30.2 29.5 25.8 31.9 30.1

                   

Case Dismissals

California Inmate Population

148,000

150,000

152,000

154,000156,000

158,000

160,000

162,000

Pop 1997 Pop 1998 Pop 1999 Pop 2000

19 February 2003- 159,695 of which 18,632 are INS Holds

Parolees per Capita and County-1999

050

100150200250300350

Co

ntra

Co

sta

Sa

n L

uis O

bisp

oS

an

ta C

ruz

Sa

n F

ran

ciscoS

an

Ma

teo

So

no

ma

Ve

ntu

raP

lace

rA

lam

ed

a

Mo

nte

rey

Sa

nta

Ba

rba

raO

ran

ge

Sta

nisla

us

Hu

mb

old

tS

an

Joa

qu

inS

an

Die

go

So

lan

oT

ula

reS

acra

me

nto

FR

ES

NO

Me

rced

Co

un

tyL

os A

ng

ele

s R

iversid

eS

ha

staS

an

Be

rna

rdin

oK

ing

s K

ern

Percent of Parolees Returned to Custody-1999

05

10152025303540

Gle

nn

Im

pe

rial

Sa

nta

Cru

z H

um

bo

ldt

Kin

gs

Pla

cer

Sa

n L

uis O

bisp

o

So

no

ma

M

erce

d

Sh

asta

M

on

tere

y S

an

ta B

arb

ara

S

an

Ma

teo

T

ula

re

Sa

n F

ran

cisco

Sa

n Jo

aq

uin

S

ola

no

V

en

tura

S

tan

islau

s C

on

tra C

osta

F

RE

SN

OA

lam

ed

a

Sa

nta

Cla

ra

Ke

rn

Sa

cram

en

toO

ran

ge

R

iversid

e

Sa

n B

ern

ard

ino

S

an

Die

go

L

os A

ng

ele

s

Fresno County Parolee Violators Returned to CDC

300

350

400

450

Y 1997 Y 1998 Y 1999 Y 2000

More probation/parole officers

Target hardening efforts-reduce opportunities for crime

More Creative Approaches to dealing with Motor Vehicle Theft

Greater efforts aimed at gangs and weapons related offenses.

Reducing FTAs (LAO)

Reducing Early Releases from Jail (LAO)