AfCD1

5
AfCD1 AfCD2 AfCD3 AfCI1 AfCI2 WC3 AfCI3 AfTD1 WC1 WC2 AfTD2 AfTD3 AfTI1 AfTI2 AfTI3 WT1 WT2 WT3 (a ) AfCD1 AfCD2 AfCD3 AfCI1 AfCI2 WC3 AfCI3 AfTD1 WC1 AfTD2 AfTD3 AfTI1 AfTI2 AfTI3 WT1 WT2 (b ) Supplemental Figure S1

description

AfTD1. AfTI1. AfCI3. AfTD2. (a). AfTD3. (b). AfCD3. AfCD1. AfTD2. AfCD2. AfTD3. AfCI2. AfCD3. AfTI2. AfTD1. AfTI3. AfCD1. WC1. AfCI1. AfCD2. WC3. AfCI3. WT1. AfTI2. WT2. AfCI1. AfTI1. AfTI3. WT3. WC1. WT1. AfCI2. WC3. WT2. WC2. Supplemental Figure S1. (c). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of AfCD1

Page 1: AfCD1

AfCD1

AfCD2

AfCD3

AfCI1

AfCI2

WC3

AfCI3

AfTD1

WC1

WC2

AfTD2

AfTD3

AfTI1

AfTI2

AfTI3

WT1

WT2

WT3

(a)

AfCD1

AfCD2

AfCD3

AfCI1

AfCI2

WC3

AfCI3

AfTD1

WC1

AfTD2

AfTD3

AfTI1

AfTI2

AfTI3

WT1

WT2

(b)

Supplemental Figure S1

Page 2: AfCD1

AfCD1

AfCD2

AfCD3

AfCI1

AfCI2

WC3

AfCI3

AfTD1

WC1

WC2

AfTD2

AfTD3

AfTI1

AfTI2

AfTI3

WT1

WT2

WT3

(c)

Page 3: AfCD1

p=0.718 p=0.096

(a)

p=0.718

(b)

p=0.096 p=0.718 p=0.096 p=0.718 p=0.096

(a)

p=0.718

(a)

p=0.718

(b)

p=0.096

(b)(b)

p=0.096

Supplemental Figure S2

Page 4: AfCD1

Supplemental Figure S3

Similarity Observed OTUs Average Low High97% 79 165.125 120.664 257.03495% 66 101 81.2932 146.101

Chao1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Number of analyzed sequences

Nu

mb

er

of

ob

se

rve

d O

TU

's

97%

95%

Page 5: AfCD1

Supplemental material:• Supplemental Figure S1: Cluster analysis using the unweighted-pair group

method for (a) total bacterial and (b) Pseudomonas and (c) Actinobacteria. AfCD, A. fulva from Caboclo Island extracted directly; AfCI, A. fulva from Caboclo Island extracted indirectly; AfTD, A. fulva from Tartaruga beach extracted directly; AfTI, A. fulva from Tartaruga beach extracted indirectly; SWC, surrounding seawater from Caboclo Island; SWT, surrounding seawater from Tartaruga beach.

• Supplemental Figure S2: LIBSHUFF comparison plots of evolutionary distance by homologous coverage curves from direct (red line) compared to heterologous coverage curve from indirect (green line) 16S rRNA gene clone libraries (a) and homologous coverage curves for indirect (red line) compared to heterologous coverage curve direct (green line) 16S rRNA gene clone libraries (b). The blue line indicates the value of delta C (right y axis) for the original samples at each value of evolutionary distance. Purple line indicates the 95% of delta C for the randomized samples. The ranked values (p) of the delta C from the heterologous coverage are shown.

• Supplemental Figure S3: Rarefaction curves of observed operational taxonomic units (OTU) at the “species” (97%, bold) and “genus” (95%, dotted) levels for partial bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from A. fulva derived DNA. The table on the upper-left side shows Chao1 richness estimations with their respective low and high confidence limits (95%), as well as the number of OTUs determined with DOTUR for each case evaluated.