AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

20
New Trends in Enterprise Architecture AEA Greenland 1 November 2013 John Gøtze
  • date post

    14-Sep-2014
  • Category

    Technology

  • view

    450
  • download

    1

description

 

Transcript of AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

Page 1: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

New  Trends  in    Enterprise  Architecture    AEA  Greenland  1  November  2013    John  Gøtze  

Page 2: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

04/11/13   ·∙  2  

Page 3: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

04/11/13   ·∙  3  

Page 4: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

What  does  Gartner  say?  

Page 5: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013
Page 6: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

WHAT  DOES  GARTNER  SAY?  

Page 7: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013
Page 8: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

John Seddon (2008) Systems Thinking in the Public Sector: The Failure of the Reform Regime.... and a Manifesto for a Better Way Triarchy Press

Page 9: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

9  

SYSTEM  THINKING  IS  ABOUT…..  

Emergence  

Feedback Loops

Creation of Purpose

Managing Complexity

Wholes

Not IT

Not Process

Patrick Hoverstadt

Page 10: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

SYSTEM  THINKING  SCHOOLS  

Planning  School  Systems  thinking  is  a  holisVc  approach  to  planning  complex  systems.  Pioneers  of  this  approach  include  C.W.  Churchman  and  Russ  Ackoff.  

 System  Dynamics  School  

Systems  thinking  looks  at  the  cause-­‐effect  and  feedback  loops  that  drive  complex  systems.  Pioneers  of  this  approach  include  Jay  Forrester,  Donella  Meadows.  

 OrganizaVonal  CyberneVcs  School  

Stafford  Beer's  Viable  Systems  Model  (VSM)  which  applies  systems  thinking  to  organizaVonal  design,  focusing  on  the  management  of  variety  to  achieve  long-­‐term  viability.  Builds  on  the  work  of  Norbert  Wiener  and  Ross  Ashby  .  

 OrganizaVon  Learning  School  

Popularized  by  Peter  Senge,  largely  based  on  earlier  work  by  Chris  Argyris  and  Donald  Schön,  but  also  drawing  on  the  work  of  Forrester.    Soe  System/Sensemaking  School  

Sees  systems  as  mental  constructs  rather  than  physical  constructs  and  systems  thinking  as  an  ongoing  process  of  enquiry  to  improve  shared  understanding.  The  Pioneers  include  Peter  Checkland  and  Brian  Wilson.  Sir  Geoffrey  Vickers  and  Karl  Weick  are  also  associated  with  this  type  of  approach.  

 Complexity  and  Chaos  School  

System  thinking  explores  the  emergent  properVes  of  complex  systems.  Approaches  include  Dave  Snowden's  parVcipatory  methods  based  on  narraVve  principles.  Snowden's  Cynefin  model  can  be  used  to  assess  which  systems  thinking  approach  is  most  applicable  to  a  given  situaVon.  Also  Robert  Pirsig's  Metaphysics  of  Quality  (MOQ).  

 Quality  and  Service  Design  School  

Popularized  by  John  Seddon,  largely  based  on  earlier  work  by  Walter  Shewart  and  Edwards  Deming.  Linked  to  the  StaVsVcal  Process  Control  technique  (someVmes  known  as  Six  Sigma).    

                     hip://lenscrae.wikispaces.com/systems+thinking    

10  

Page 11: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

…  PLUS  

StructuraVon  School  -­‐  Anthony  Giddens  Social  Systems  School  -­‐  Niklas  Luhmann  Second-­‐order  cyberneVcs  -­‐  Heinz  von  Foerster,  Gregory  Bateson,  Humberto  Maturana  

…  

11  

Page 12: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

12  

•  Conant-Ashby Theorem: “every good regulator of a system has to have a model of that system” •  Faults of Commission & Faults of

Omission

”Only variety destroys variety”

Page 13: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

VSM  -­‐  VIABLE  SYSTEM  MODEL  

04/11/13   13  

Delivery

Intelligence

Governance

Environment

Operations

Co-ordinationM

onitoring

Patrick Hoverstadt (2008) The Fractal Organization: Creating sustainable organizations with the Viable System Model. Wiley

Page 14: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

1.    Change  agent  2.    Communicator  3.  Leader  4.  Manager  5.  Modeler  …  

04/11/13   14  

Page 15: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

Core  enterprise  architects:  experts  in  enterprise  architecture  theory  and  pracVce.  

 Implicit  enterprise  architects:  those  who  support  enterprise  architecture  work.  

 Applied  enterprise  architects:  those  who  define  enterprise  architecture  requirements.  

04/11/13   15  

Page 16: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

Three  categories  of  boundary  objects:      Ar<facts,  which  are  the  shared  tools,  documents,  models.  

 Discourse,  which  is  a  common  language  that  can  be  shared  across  communiVes  of  pracVce.    

 Processes,  i.e.,  the  shared  processes,  rouVnes,  and  procedures  that  facilitate  coordinaVon  of  and  between  communiVes  of  pracVce  

04/11/13   16  

Gøtze, J., 2013, The Changing Role of the Enterprise Architect. Proceedings of the 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW 2013), 9-13 September 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Page 17: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

DIALECTIC  SKILLS  

 Enterprise  architects  must  have  competencies  in  resolving  conflicts,  and  in  creaVng  consensus,  synthesis  and  common  understanding.  Detect  what  might  establish  that  common  ground  and  the  skill  of  seeking  the  intent  rather  than  just  reading  the  face  value  of  the  words.  

04/11/13   17  

UPDM based on UML?? WTF?

Page 18: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

DIALOGIC  SKILLS    In  facing  wicked  problems  [71],  enterprise  architects  must  focus  more  on  problem-­‐finding  than  problem-­‐solving.  In  analogy  with  craesmanship,  crae  looks  at  situaVons  in  a  problemfinding  manner  [72].  When  skilled  in  the  crae  of  cooperaVon  [69],  and  confident  in  their  ability  to  negoVate  complexity,  the  architects  can  interact  with  those  who  are  different,  antagonisVc,  or  even  aggressive  towards  them.  Such  dialogic  skills  [69]  also  include  listening  well,  behaving  tacsully,  finding  points  of  agreement  and  managing  disagreement,  and  avoiding  frustraVon  in  a  difficult  discussion.  Dialogics,  or  the  dialogical  domain,  is  “that  world  of  talk  that  makes  an  open  social  space,  where  discussion  can  take  an  unforeseen  direcVon”  [69].  Dialogic  conversaVon,  the  “subjuncVve  mood  in  speech”,  opens  a  “space  of  ambiguity”  within  the  conversaVon,  for  all  parVes  equally.  It  also  facilitates  empathy,  which  should  be  disVnguished  from  sympathy,  as  curiosity  or  wonder  about  an  other,  as  opposed  to  idenVficaVon  [69].  

04/11/13   18  

Page 19: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

Architecture    IdenVty    Experience  

04/11/13   19  

Page 20: AEA Greenland Presentation 1 Nov 2013

04/11/13   20