AE 169 CFD Project

44
AE 169 Professor Dr. Papadopoulos Robin Dhillon Duong Tang

Transcript of AE 169 CFD Project

Page 1: AE 169 CFD Project

AE 169

Professor Dr. Papadopoulos

Robin Dhillon

Duong Tang

Page 2: AE 169 CFD Project

1. NACA 0012 Airfoil

2. Analysis of De Laval Nozzle

Page 3: AE 169 CFD Project

● Using CFD to simulate the flow around a NACA 0012 airfoil

at Re=1,000,000

● Compare lift and drag coefficients from ESI/ACE+ with

published data

● Use CFD to simulate the flow around de laval nozzle

Page 4: AE 169 CFD Project

The NACA 0012 airfoil is a symmetrical airfoil that produces no

lift at zero angle of attack.

Specifications and parameters:

● Thickness: 12.0%

● Camber: 0.0%

● Trailing edge angle: 58.6o

● Leading edge radius: 1.7%

● Zero-lift angle: 0.0o

● Max CL: ~1.35

● Max CL angle:15.0o

● Max L/D:36.958

● Max L/D angle: 7.5o

● Max L/D CL:0.842

Page 5: AE 169 CFD Project

Grid independent study:

● Grid points: 100 for airfoil, 150 for nozzle

● Due to time constraints, 300 grid points was not used

Flow conditions to achieve Re=1,000,000:

● 𝑉 = 100𝑚/𝑠

● 𝐶 = 1𝑚

● 𝜌=1.164𝑘𝑔/𝑚3

● 𝜇 = 1.164 ∗ 10−4

● 𝑃 = 100,000𝑃𝑎

Page 6: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 7: AE 169 CFD Project

Simulation grid

● Divided into 4 sections

● Vertical divider connects

at trailing edge

Page 8: AE 169 CFD Project

Simulation geometry

Page 9: AE 169 CFD Project

Simulation geometry at an angle of attack (12AoA)

Page 10: AE 169 CFD Project

ACE simulation

Page 11: AE 169 CFD Project

NACA 0012:

•Lift and drag curve of airfoil

•Flow geometry

Page 12: AE 169 CFD Project

Velocity contours at 0 AoA

Page 13: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 0 AoA

Page 14: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 1 AoA

Page 15: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 2 AoA

Page 16: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 3 AoA

Page 17: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 4 AoA

Page 18: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 5 AoA

Page 19: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 6 AoA

Page 20: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 7 AoA

Page 21: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 8 AoA

Page 22: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 9 AoA

Page 23: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 10 AoA

Page 24: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 11 AoA

Page 25: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 12 AoA

Page 26: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 13 AoA

Page 27: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 14 AoA

Page 28: AE 169 CFD Project

Pressure contours at 15 AoA

Page 29: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 30: AE 169 CFD Project

• Convergent-divergent Nozzle

• Nozzle was developed by Swedish

* inventor Gustaf De Laval in 1888

• This principle was first used in a rocket

* engine by Robert Goddard

Page 31: AE 169 CFD Project

http://www.academia.edu/7907376/cfd_analysis_of_rocket_nozzle

Parameter Dimension

Total Nozzle Length (mm) 484

Inlet Diameter(mm) 166.6

Throat Diameter(mm) 34.5

Outlet Diameter(mm) 183.0

Chamber Length(mm) 99.93

Convergent Angle (deg) 32

Divergent Angle(deg) 11.31

Static Inlet Pressure(N/m^2) 10000000

Static Outlet Pressure(N/m^2) 101325

Static Inlet Temperature (K) 3300

Page 32: AE 169 CFD Project

Grid independent study:

● 150 grid points were used (previously 100, but 150

gave more accurate results)

Page 33: AE 169 CFD Project

Simulation grid

● divided into different sections

● easier to achieve orthogonality

Page 34: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 35: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 36: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 37: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 38: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 39: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 40: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 41: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 42: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 43: AE 169 CFD Project
Page 44: AE 169 CFD Project

● Lift coefficient was more accurate than drag coefficient

● More grid points would have led to more accurate results

● Errors due to differences in Reynolds number and numbers of

iterations

● Adding Boundary Layer improves drag simulation accuracy