Advances in Josephson Quantum...
Transcript of Advances in Josephson Quantum...
APS 2010 March Meeting, Tutorial #3
Advances in Josephson Quantum Circuits
Portland Convention Center Sunday, March 148:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Instructors:
Michel Devoret, Yale University"Introduction to superconducting quantum circuits"
Yasunobu Nakamura, NEC Japan"Superconducting qubits coupled to a transmission line "
John Martinis, University of California, Santa Barbara"Precision Control of Josephson Qubits"
Leo DiCarlo, Yale University"Production and detection of entanglement in cQED processors"
Introduction to superconducting quantum circuits
Outline• Motivation: quantum information
• Why Josephson junctions?
• Main flavors of Josephson qubits
• Readout of qubits
• 1-qubit qnd 2-qubit gates
Final version of this presentation available athttp://qulab.eng.yale.edu/archives.htm (talks)
J. Clarke and F. Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031-1042 (2008)
RECENT REVIEWS ON JOSEPHSONQUANTUM CIRCUITS
R. Schoelkopf and S. M. Girvin, Nature 451, 664-669 (2008)
M.H. Devoret and J.M. Martinis, Quantum Information Processing 3,163 (2004)
J.M. Martinis, Quantum Information Processing 8, 81 (2009)
A. Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A 75, 032329 (2007)
CLASSICAL BIT = SWITCH
1
0
Mechanical switch Electrical switch
CMOSTransistor
0 1
Bit state is either 0 or 1: 1) strong dissipation and 2) kTnoise<< B
0 1
EnergyCoordinate
B kTnoise
QUANTUM BIT: 2 LEVELSFORMING EFFECTIVE SPIN 1/2
ENERGY
}
MOLECULE, ATOM, PARTICLE...
10α β+
0
1
2
34
Qubit state can be 0 and 1: 1) no dissipation and 2) kTnoise<< hω01
0
1
spin up
spin down
y
z
x
θ
φ2
2
2
2
cos e
sin e
i
i
φ
φ
θ
θ
α
β
+
−
=
=
Bloch sphererepresentation
RELAXATION TIMES OF QUANTUM MEMORY
T1 PROCESS
random fieldsin x,y plane
Tφ PROCESS
random fieldalong z
2
1
11 1
2
T
T Tφ
=+
DECOHERENCE TIME 01 2Tω DECOHERENCEQUALITY FACTOR
2N = 1024 POSSIBLE CONFIGURATIONS
REGISTER WITH N=10 BITS:
THE POWER OF QUANTUM SUPERPOSITION
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
classically, can store and work only onone number between 0 et 1023
2N = 1024 POSSIBLE CONFIGURATIONS
classically, can store and work only onone number between 0 et 1023
REGISTER WITH N=10 BITS:
THE POWER OF QUANTUM SUPERPOSITION
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0“quantally”, can store and work on an
arbitrary superposition of these numbers!
0 1 2 2 10 1 2 ..... 2 1N
Nα α α α−
Ψ = + + + + −
QUANTUM PARALLELISM
suppose a function f { } ( ) { }0,1023 0,1023j n f j∈ → = ∈
Classically, need 1000 ×10-bit registers (10,000 bits) to storeinformation about this function and to work on it.
Quantum-mechanically, a 20-qubit register can suffice!
( )2 1
/ 20
12
N
Nj
j f j−
=
Ψ = ∑Function encoded in a superposition of states of register
MICROFABRICATION L ~ 3nH, C ~ 1pF, ωr /2π ~ 4GHz
SIMPLEST EXAMPLE: SUPERCONDUCTING LC OSCILLATOR CIRCUIT
HOW CAN A SUPERCONDUCTING CIRCUITBEHAVE LIKE AN ATOM?
ELECTRONIC FLUID FLOWS BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN PLATES:ALL ELECTRONS BEHAVE AS A SINGLE CHARGED ENTITY
see practical LC superconducting resonators: Lindström et al., PRB 80, 132501 (2009)Paik & Osborn, APL 96, 072505 (2010)
+Qφ
-Q
QUANTUM CIRCUITS IN A NUTSHELL:FLUX AND CHARGE DO NOT COMMUTE
V
I
ˆ ˆ, iQφ⎡ ⎤⎣ =⎦
LIφ = Q VC=
+Qφ
-Q
φ
E
LC CIRCUIT AS QUANTUMHARMONIC OSCILLATOR
rωh
( )†
†
ˆ 1ˆ ˆ 2ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ
ˆ ˆ;
2
2
r
r r r r
r r
r r
H a a
Q Qa i a iQ Q
L
Q C
ω
φ φφ φ
φ ω
ω
= +
= + = −
=
=
annihilation and creation operatorsfor excitation quanta of circuit(standing photons)
φ
φ
WAVEFUNCTIONS OF LC CIRCUIT
rωhI
φ
E
Ψ(φ)Ψ0
0Ψ1
In every energy eigenstate,(standing photon state)
current flows in opposite directions simultaneously!
2 rφ
01
φ
φ
EFFECT OF DAMPING
important: as littledissipation as possible dissipation broadens energy levels
E
112 2n r
r
iE n
RC
ω
ω
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞= + +⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦=
φ
CAN PLACE CIRCUIT IN ITS GROUND STATE
Br k Tω5 GHz 15 mK
rωh
E
residual dissipationprovides
reset of circuit
φ
φ
E
PB: ALL TRANSITIONS ARE DEGENERATE!
CANNOT STEER THE SYSTEM TO AN ARBITRARY STATEIF PERFECTLY LINEAR
rωh
Potential energy
Position coordinate
NEED NON-LINEARITY TO FULLYREVEAL QUANTUM MECHANICS
Emissionspectrum
frequency01ω12ω23ω34ω
JOSEPHSON TUNNEL JUNCTIONPROVIDES A NON-LINEAR INDUCTOR
WITH NO DISSIPATION
1nm SI
S
φ
ΙΙ = φ / LJ
( )0 0sin /I I φ φ=
CJLJ
Ι
( )' 't
V t dtφ−∞
= ∫
0 2eφ =
20 0
0J
J
LE Iφ φ
= =
JOSEPHSON TUNNEL JUNCTIONPROVIDES A NON-LINEAR INDUCTOR
WITH NO DISSIPATION
φ
( )0cos /JU E φ φ= −
CJLJ
Ι
( )' 't
V t dtφ−∞
= ∫
0 2eφ =
20 0
0J
J
LE Iφ φ
= =
Bare Josephson potential
1nm SI
S
ordinary inductance
ENERGY SCALESOF THE JOSEPHSON JUNCTION "ATOM"
RESTOF
CIRCUIT
extq( )ˆ ' '
tQ I t dt
−∞= ∫
ˆˆ
ˆˆ
2
2QN
e
e
φϕ =
=
ˆˆ, iNϕ⎡ ⎤ =⎣ ⎦
( )2
ˆ co8 ˆ2
ˆs
exCJ
tJEH
NNE ϕ
−= −
2
2Cj
E eC
=
2ext
extqN
e=
Hamiltonian:
Coulomb charging energy for 1e
18JE = ΔNT
Josephson energy
gap
# condion channels
barrier transpcy
reduced offset charge
valid foropaque barrier
φ
HARMONIC APPROXIMATION
( )2
ˆ co8 ˆs2J
ex
J
t
C
NE E
NH ϕ
−= −
( )22
,2ˆ
82
e
CJ h J
xtNE
NEH ϕ−
= +
8 CP
JE Eω =
Josephson"plasma" frequency:
Spectrum independent of DC value of Next
( )28
2J
J
CZe
EE
=
JosephsonRF impedance:
JCE E , low energy
3 TYPES OF BIASES
U
chargeJL
JC 2 gC2 gC
( )2/ 2ˆ
ˆ8 cos2C JgN
E EC U
ϕ−
−
"Cooper pair box"ϕ̂ lives on circle
N̂ integer
3 TYPES OF BIASES
U
Φb
charge fluxJL JL
JC JC2 gC2 gC L
( )2/ 2ˆ
ˆ8 cos2C JgN
E EC U
ϕ−
−
"Cooper pair box"ϕ̂ lives on circle
N̂ integer
b2
2 ˆˆˆ8 co
2
s2 2C L J
eNE E E
ϕϕ
⎛ ⎞−⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠+ −
Φ
"RF-Squid", lives on line, real numberϕ̂ N̂
3 TYPES OF BIASES
UIb
Φb
charge flux currentJL JL JL
JC JCJC2 gC2 gC L
( )2/ 2ˆ
ˆ8 cos2C JgN
E EC U
ϕ−
−2
b
0
ˆˆ ˆ8 cos
2C J IN E IE ϕ ϕ
⎛ ⎞− −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
"Cooper pair box"ϕ̂ lives on circle
N̂ integerin the limit
b
LΦ → ∞
→ ∞b
bIL
Φ→
b2
2 ˆˆˆ8 co
2
s2 2C L J
eNE E E
ϕϕ
⎛ ⎞−⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠+ −
Φ
"RF-Squid", lives on line, real numberϕ̂ N̂
EFFECTIVE POTENTIALOF 3 MAIN BIAS SCHEMES
"phase" bias
"flux" bias
"charge" bias
NIST, UCSB,U. Maryland, I. Neel Grenoble...
TU Delft, NEC, NTT, IBM,MIT, UC Berkeley, SUNY, IPHT Jena ....
CEA Saclay, NEC, YaleChalmers, JPL, ...
22
eh
ϕπ
φ=
2ehφ
2ehφ
12
− 12
+
e giN
see also proposals fortopologically protected
qubits, for exampleFeigelman et al. PRL 92,
098301 (2004)
a few levels here.quasi-continuum
there.
0b 2
ΦΦ
=
SUPERCONDUCTING ARTIFICIAL ATOMS"MENDELEEV" TABLE
/L JE E
/J CE E
0 1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Cooper Pair Box
Quantronium
Transmon
Fluxonium
100000Phase qubit
Flux Qubit
inverse ofnumber of wells
in potential
charge fluctuationsrelative to phase fluctuations
THE MEMORY READOUT PROBLEM
QUBIT READOUTON
OFF0 1
QUBIT READOUTON
OFF
1) SWITCH WITH ON/OFF RATIO AS LARGE AS POSSIBLE2) READOUT WITH F AS CLOSE TO 1 AS POSSIBLE3) FAST, 4) PRESERVE STATE (QND)
WANT:
0 1
1
0
QUBIT READOUTON
OFF0 1
0 1
0 10 11F ε ε= − −
1ε0ε
FIDELITY:
or
pointervariable
10 or
STATE DECAY STRATEGY
1
0
1
0
Martinis, Devoret and Clarke, PRL 55 (1985)Martinis, Nam, Aumentado and Urbina, PRL 89 (2002)
QUBITCIRCUIT
10
or
or
rf signal in rf signal out
A) FILTER OUT EVERYTHING ELSE THAN READOUT RFB) REPEAT WITH ENOUGH PHOTONS TO BEAT
NOISE : USE THE BEST AMPLIFIER AS POSSIBLE
DISPERSIVE READOUT STRATEGY
01ω ω≠
QUBIT STATEENCODED IN PHASE
OF OUTGOING SIGNAL,NO ENERGY DISSIPATED
ON-CHIP
Blais et al. PRA 2004, Walraff et al., Nature 2004
(see session V26 )
"Circuit QED": Review by Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A 75, 032329 (2007)
SCHEMATIC OF COOPER PAIR BOXESIN A MICROWAVE RESONATOR (CAVITY)
Roles of cavity: 1) Filter, 2) Dispersive measurement, 3) Quantum bus
IN
OUT
PAULI SPIN MATRICES AND ROTATIONS
1 00 1
0 11 0
00
1 00 1
z
x
y
w
Z
X
iY
i
I
σ
σ
σ
σ
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
[ ] ( )
[ ] ( )
[ ] ( )
00
00
0 11 0
1 00 1
z z
x x
y y
w
iZ i R
i
iX i R
i
Y i R
I Identity
σ π
σ π
σ π
σ
⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥=− = →⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥=− = →⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥=− = →⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= = →⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
usefulnotationof Paulispinmatrices
HERMITIAN (MEASUREMENT) UNITARY (GATE)
ELEMENTARY GATES ARE π/2 ROTATIONS
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )ˆ
cos sin2 2
yxx x
H t t t tσσ
ω φ ω φ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
( ) ( )ˆ
cos2
zz x z x
H t t tωσ ω ω φ σ⎡ ⎤= + +⎣ ⎦In lab frame:
In rotating frameat Larmor freq.:
Do rotating wave approximation
Pulse 90°taround x
( )x tω area π/2
transverse osc.field amplitude
φ = 0
Pulse 90°taround y
( )x tω area π/2
φ = π/2
[ ]1/ 2X [ ]1/ 2Y[ ]1/ 2Z : shift Zeeman field
NATURAL ENTANGLING OPERATIONS
[ ]1/ 2ZZSecular interaction: 21intˆ
z zH g σ σ=
( ) ( )intˆ ˆexp /U iHτ τ= −
Flip-flop interaction:
( )1
1 1
nt 2i
2 2
ˆ . .
x x y y
H g h c
g
σ σ
σ σ σ σ⊥ + −
⊥
= +
= +
[ ] [ ]1/ 2 1/ 2X YX Y
adjustment of gate duration time:4gπ
τ =
1 2
PAIRWISE COUPLING v.s. BUS COUPLING
qubit
microwave transmission line resonator
coupling element
qubit coupling element:capacitor, inductor,auxiliary qubit
TWO-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSORslide courtesy of
Leo DiCarlo & Rob Schoelkopf
see 1 qubit and 2 cavities: B. Johnson et al. , 3 qubits and 1 cavity L. DiCarlo et al.: T26, W6
1Q 2Q
1f
2V2f
T29, V26, Y26
1V
Acknowledgements: Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics GroupsDepts. Applied Physics and Physics, Yale
P.I.'s
Grads
Post-Docs
Res. Sc.
Collab.
M. D.R. VIJAY (UCB)M. METCALFE (NIST)V. MANUCHARIANF. SCHAKERTN. MASLUKA. KAMALI. SIDDIQI (UCB)C. WILSON (Chalmers)E. BOAKNIN (McK)N. BERGEAL (ESPCI)C. RIGETTIM. BRINK
D. ESTEVE et coll.(Saclay)B. HUARD (LPA/ENS)
S. GIRVINT. YUL. BISHOP
J. KOCHJ. GAMBETTA(U. Waterloo)E. GINOSSARA. NUNNENKAMP
F. MARQUARDT(Munich)A. BLAIS(Sherbrooke)A. CLERK (McGill)
R. SCHOELKOPFB. TUREK (MIT)J. CHOWB. JOHNSONA. SEARSM. READA. WALRAFF (ETH)H. MAJER (Vienna)A. HOUCK (Princeton)D. SCHUSTERL. DiCARLOL. SUNH. PAIKL. FRUNZIO
P. ZOLLER(Innsbruck)
W.M. KECK