Advanced Macroeconomics Module 3: Empirical models ...amoneta/m2019_2.pdfOkun’s lawPhillips curve...
Transcript of Advanced Macroeconomics Module 3: Empirical models ...amoneta/m2019_2.pdfOkun’s lawPhillips curve...
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Advanced MacroeconomicsModule 3: Empirical models & methods
2. Crucial empirical relationships in macroeconomics
Alessio Moneta
Institute of EconomicsScuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa
February-March 2019
LM in EconomicsScuola Superiore Sant’Anna - Universita di Pisa
Macroeconomic fluctuations 1/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Introduction
In this series of lectures we deal with crucial relationships such as:• Output/Unemployment and Inflation;• Money and Output.• Fiscal policy (gov. exp.) and output
Several controversies emerged because of different interpretations ofthe empirical evidence which correspond to different schools ofthought.
We focus in particular on the:• Keynesian School;• New Classical School.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 2/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Introduction
Query: how is possible to have different interpretation of the sameempirical evidence? Two issues:
• Evidence may change over time;• Evidence is interpreted through the lens of econometrics, which
may encompass different approaches.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 3/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Output and Unemployment
(Okun’s law)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 4/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Output-Unemployment
The relationship between Output and Unemployment is not ascontroversial as the relationship between Unemployment (or Output)and Inflation:
When output falls unemployment raises.
But: when output raises unemployment does not alwaysdeclines (cfr. jobless recovery).
In sum: the relationship between unemployment and outputchanges during recoveries/recessions.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 5/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Output-Unemployment: Okun’s law
Okun, A. (1962): “Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance”(Proceedings of the ASA).
Okus’s “law” (gap version):
shortfall in GDP growth of x% relative to normal growth isassociated with a rise of y% in the unemployment rate
original formulation: x = 3; y = 1 (more recently: x = 2; y = 1)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 6/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Okun’s Law (difference version)
Suppose to estimate through a OLS regression the following empiricalrelationship:
∆Ut = a + bYt + εt (1)
where ∆Ut : change in the unemployment rate, Yt : growth rate of GDP, εt :error term.
Equation (1) can be re-written as
∆Ut = b(Yt +ab) + εt (2)
or (γ = −b, Y∗t = − ab )
∆Ut = −γ(Yt − Y∗t ) + εt (3)
Y∗t is a critical growth rate of GDP: below this rate unemployment rises,above this rate unemployment falls. It is called modified balanced rate ofgrowth.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 7/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Digression on the modified balanced rate of growth:
Let’s call LF: labour force, L: number of workers employed; POP:working-age population; θ := Y
L labour productivity; PR:= LFPOP , participation
rate; X:= growth rate of X (for any variable X).
Ut =LFt − Lt
LFt⇒ 1−Ut =
LtLFt
(1−Ut) ≈ L− LF ≈ ∆(1−Ut)
1−Ut
∆Ut ≈ (1−Ut)(LF− L) = (Ut− 1)(Yt− PR− POP− θ) = (Ut− 1)(Yt− Y∗)
where Y∗ := PR + POP + θ.
Cfr. Hoover (2012: pp. 590-592.)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 8/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Okun’s Law
Plot from Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, Figure 15.4, p.
593. Okun’s Law for U.S., 1974-2009. Source data: Bureau of Labor Statistics (unemployment);
Bureau of Economic Analysis (GDP); calculations: Hoover (2012).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 9/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Okun’s Law (potential output)
Plot from Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, Figure 15.5, p.
594. Okun’s Law for U.S., 1974-2009. Source data: Bureau of Economic Analysis (GDP); Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Bureau of Labor Statistics (scaled output),
calculations: Hoover (2012).Macroeconomic fluctuations 10/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Unemployment (Output) and Inflation (Wages)
(Phillips curve and its interpretation)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 11/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Main features:
B Main features of the Keynesian approach:
• peculiarity of the propagation mechanism: nominal stickiness
prices and wages do not adjust instantaneously
• impulse mechanism:
monetary shocks
real shocks (e.g. changes in government purchases, investmentdemand, technology)
• emphasis to demand-side factors
• involuntary unemployment (some degrees of market failure)
• need of interventionist policy (fiscal and not only monetary policy)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 12/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Contributors
B Protagonists of the Keynesian approach:
B Keynes (1936)
B Neoclassical synthesis (1950s - 1960s) and the orthodox Keynesianschool: Tobin, Klein, Solow, Modigliani, Hicks, Samuelson
B New Keynesians: Blanchard, Mankiw, Phelps, D. Romer, Stiglitz,Bernanke, Krugman (1980s-)
B Post-Keynesians: Robinson, Kaldor, Minsky, Davidson.
Cfr. Snowdon and Vane 2005, pp. 24-29
Macroeconomic fluctuations 13/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Theoretical background
B Two pillars of the standard Keynesianism:
• IS/LM model (Hicks 1937, Modigliani 1944, Hansen 1949, 1953)
aim: explanation of the forces determining output andemployment
• Phillips curve (Phillips 1958)
aim: prediction of the rate of inflation which would result fromdifferent target levels of unemployment
Macroeconomic fluctuations 14/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS-AD scheme (Keynesians)
P
Y
AD
AS
Keynesian scheme
Macroeconomic fluctuations 15/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS-AD scheme (New Classicals)
P
Y
AD
AS
Classical model
Macroeconomic fluctuations 16/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
IS-LM scheme
i
Y
IS
LM
IS−LM model
Note: this figure is drawn for a given price level and government expenditure
Macroeconomic fluctuations 17/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
IS-LM-AD: fiscal policy effect
i
Y
IS0 IS1
LM
The effects of an increase in government purchases
P
Y
AD0 AD1
NB: The amount that Y increases in the IS-LM chart is the same as the amount that ADcurve shifts to the right at the value of P assumed in the IS-LM chart
Macroeconomic fluctuations 18/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
IS-LM-AD: fiscal policy effect
B What is the final effect on output and prices?
this depends on the slope of the AS curve
vertical AS: no effect for Y (only P increases)
horizontal AS: viceversa
“Thus, incomplete adjustment of nominal prices introduces a new channel throughwhich shocks affect output...[If] nominal prices do not adjust fully in the shortrun...any change in the demand for goods at a given price level affects output. ”(Romer 2001: 224)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 19/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS behaviour: an idealized Keynesian modelwith sticky wages, flexible prices and competitive product market
B Cfr. Keynes (1936)
B Nominal wage is rigid:
W = W
B Aggregate supply with labour L as the only factor of production(decreasing returns):
Y = F(L) F′(·) > 0 F′′(·) < 0
B Perfect competition + profit maximization implies that marginalrevenue = marginal cost1, i.e.
F′(L) =WP
=WP
1Cfr. e.g. Hoover (2012, section 9.1.2)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 20/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS behaviour: an idealized Keynesian modelwith sticky wages, flexible prices and competitive product market
B What is the slope of the AS curve?
we have to find the sign of dYdP in the supply model
B Differentiating Y = F(L) (cfr. chain rule):
dYdP
=dF(L)
dLdLdP
N.B. F′(L) = dF(L)dL > 0 and F′′(L) = dF′(L)
dL =d(
WP
)dL < 0. Then
d(
WP
)dL
= −WP−2 dPdL
< 0 which impliesdPdL
> 0
B We have found that dYdP is the product of two positive quantities, then is
positive and therefore the AS curve is upward sloping
Macroeconomic fluctuations 21/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS behaviour: an idealized Keynesian modelwith sticky wages, flexible prices and competitive product market
B Increases in aggregate demand lead to increases in prices, output andlabour demand and reduces real wages and unemployment
Source: Romer D. (4ed 2012) Advanced Macroeconomics, Mc Graw Hill, Figure 6.3.
Possible disequilibrium in the labour market and involuntary unemployment(cfr. distance EA)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 22/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Output-Inflation tradeoff
B Consider again the idealized Keynesian model (fixed W, flexible P andcompetitive goods market).
B Suppose that:
Wt = APt−1 A is a constant > 0
recall: Yt = F(Lt), F′(·) > 0, F′′(·) < 0, F′(Lt) =WtPt
B Suppose AD increases at time t = 1 (fiscal or monetary policy) such thatY1 > Y0
then L1 > L0 and P1 > P0
we have:
W2W1
=AP1AP0
=P1P0
B If P2 = P1 then W2P2
= A (since W2 = AP1)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 23/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Output-Inflation tradeoff
B Period 0: W0P0
= A
Period 1: W1P1
= AP0/P1
Period 2 (if price does not change): W2P2
= A⇒ employment and outputthe same as in period 0.
B Shifts in AD can keep output at the same level of period 1 or evenincrease it if inflation increases
Expansionary policies are possible at cost of inflation
B Phillips (1958): empirical study of wage inflation to the unemploymentrate in UK (1861-1957)
Phillips curve: relationship between unemployment and price inflation
Macroeconomic fluctuations 24/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Phillips curve
The Phillips curve in US 1960-1969. Source: Hoover, K.D: (2008) ”Phillips Curve.” The Concise
Encyclopedia of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty.
<www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PhillipsCurve.html>
Macroeconomic fluctuations 25/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The Phillips curve and the new classical view
Macroeconomic fluctuations 26/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Phillips curve
B The close fit between the Phillips curve and data in the 1960sencouraged some economists (e.g. Samuelson and Solow AER 1960) toexploit the Phillips curve for policy interventions
B Criticisms:
• Edmund Phelps “Phillips curves, expectations of inflation andoptimal unemployment over time” Economica 1967; “Money-wagedynamics and labor-market equilibrium” JPE 1968
• Milton Friedman “The role of monetary policy” AER 1968
B Historical facts: stagflation in the 1970s (cfr. OPEC embargo 1973-75)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 27/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Source: Romer D. (4ed 2012) Advanced Macroeconomics, Mc Graw Hill, Figure 6.7.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 28/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
4 5 6 7 8 9
02
46
810
1214
Unemployment
Infla
tion
6162636465
6667
68
6970
71
72
73
74
75
7677
78
79
80
81
82
83
8485
86
878889
90
91
929394959697
9899
0001
0203
040506
07
08
09
10
11
121314
Inflation and Unemployment US 1961−2014
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 29/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5
12
34
5
Unemployment
Infla
tion
61626364
65
6667
68
69
Inflation and Unemployment US 1960s
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 30/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5
46
810
Unemployment
Infla
tion
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Inflation and Unemployment US 1970s
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 31/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
6 7 8 9
24
68
1012
Unemployment
Infla
tion
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
8788
89
Inflation and Unemployment US 1980s
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 32/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
23
45
Unemployment
Infla
tion
90
91
9293
9495
96
97
98
99
Inflation and Unemployment US 1990s
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 33/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
4 5 6 7 8 9
01
23
4
Unemployment
Infla
tion
00
01
02
03
04
0506
07
08
09
10
11
12
1314
Inflation and Unemployment US 2000−2014
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 34/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The natural rate
B Friedman’s (1968) challenge to the interventionist interpretation of thePhillips curve: workers would be irrational, i.e. would suffer frommoney illusion, if they decided their labour supply looking at (nominal)wage only
N.B. if prices rise faster than wages, then hiring more workers becomesprofitable
B Rational agents understand that their wages can be eroded by inflation.If they expect inflation, they will demand higher wage settlements inadvance, so that nominal wages keep up with prices.
B If real wages adjust, the unemployment rate stand at a level uniquelyassociated with that real wage: the natural rate of unemployment.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 35/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The natural rate
B Friedman (1968) - Phelps (1967): nominal variables (e.g. inflation,nominal supply) cannot permanently affect real variables (e.g. output,unemployment).
B There is a normal or natural (cfr. Wicksell) rate of unemployment whichcannot be permanently affected by nominal forces and which isultimately determined by real forces only
“there is some level of unemployment which has the property that it is consistentwith equilibrium in the structure of real wage rates. At that level of unemployment,real wage rates are tending on the average to rise at a “normal” secular rate, i.e., at arate that can be indefinitely maintained so long as capital formation, technologicalimprovements, etc., remain on their long-run trends.” Friedman (1968: 8)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 36/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The natural rate
“ ‘The natural rate of unemployment’ ... is the level that would be ground out by theWalrasian system of general equilibrium equations, provided there is embedded inthem the actual structural characteristics of the labour and commodity markets,including market imperfections, stochastic variability in demands and supplies, thecosts of gathering information about job vacancies, and labor availabilities, the costsof mobility, and so on” Friedman (1968: 8)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 37/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The expectations-augmented Phillips curve
• Vertical long-run aggregate supply: prices and wages are fully flexiblein the long-run
• Formulation of the Phillips curve after Friedman (1968):
log Pt = log Pt−1 + π∗t + λ(log Yt − log Yt) + εSt λ > 0 (4)
or (πt = log Pt − log Pt−1)
πt = π∗t + λ(log Yt − log Yt) + εSt λ > 0 (5)
π∗t = core or underlying inflation
Yt is the natural rate of output or potential output
εSt : supply shocks
Macroeconomic fluctuations 38/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The expectations-augmented Phillips curve
B Simple case: π∗t = πt−1 (cfr. adaptive expectations)
• no permanent tradeoff between output and inflation
• possible tradeoff with change in inflation
• importance of steady inflation
• better fit with the data
Macroeconomic fluctuations 39/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
4 5 6 7 8 9
−4
−2
02
4
Unemployment
Del
ta In
flatio
n
62636465
66
67
6869
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
7778
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
8889
90
91 92
9394
9596
9798
9900
01
02
0304
05
0607
08
09
1011
1213
14
Inflation (first differences) and Unemployment US 1962−2014
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 40/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
4 5 6 7 8 9
−4
−2
02
4
Unemployment
Del
ta In
flatio
n
62636465
66
67
6869
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
7778
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
8889
90
91 92
9394
9596
9798
9900
01
02
0304
05
0607
08
09
1011
1213
14
Inflation (first differences) and Unemployment US 1962−2014
Source: FRED data (Inflation, consumer prices for the United States; Civilian Unemployment Rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 41/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
AS-AD in the output-inflation space
Source: Romer D. (4ed 2012) Advanced Macroeconomics, Mc Graw Hill, Figure 6.9.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 42/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The expectations-augmented Phillips curve
B General case: π∗t = πet (cfr. rational expectations)
NB πet ≡ Et−1[πt]
• path followed by the new classical macroeconomics
• compromise with the new Keynesian view of sluggishness in nominalvariables:
πt = φπet + (1− φ)πt−1 + λ(log Yt − log Yt) + εS
t (6)
where φπet + (1− φ)πt−1 = π∗t .
Macroeconomic fluctuations 43/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The expectations-augmented Phillips curve
B Expectations-augmented Phillips curve
πt = π∗t + λ(log Yt − log Yt) + εSt (7)
• general case: π∗t = πet = Et−1[πt]
• interpretation followed by the new classical macroeconomics: π∗t asrational expectation
• interpretation of core inflation as adaptive expectation: π∗t = πt−1
• compromise with the new keynesian view of sluggishness in nominalvariables: φπe
t + (1− φ)πt−1 = π∗t
Macroeconomic fluctuations 44/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The natural rate and the NAIRU
B Since output Yt is related to unemployment Ut via the Okun’s law (if Yt ↓by 3% – or 2% – then Ut ↑ by 1%) we can write the expectations-augmentedPC as
πt = π∗t − β(Ut −U∗t ) + εSt β > 0 (8)
where U∗t is the natural rate of unemployment.
B New Keynesians prefer the term NAIRU (instead of naturalunemployment) to discuss the long-run unemployment
NAIRU : non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment
• Modigliani and Papademos (1975) introduced the term NIRU(non-inflationary rate of unemployment): “a rate such that, as long asunemployment is above it, inflation can be expected to decline”
• Tobin (1980) introduced the acronym NAIRU
• Query: is NAIRU a misnomer?
Macroeconomic fluctuations 45/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The natural rate and the NAIRU
B In much economic discussion “natural rate of unemployment” andNAIRU are used interchangeably. However, there are actually subtle butimportant differences.
• NAIRU (unlike n.r.) “does not suggest that an unemployment rateis socially optimal, unchanging, or impervious to policy” (Hoover2008)
• because it is defined as the Ut at which πt is stable, “it is a reducedform — not a structural — variable” (King 1999)
• while the n.r. is a general equilibrium concept, NAIRU ismicro-founded as a balance of power between workers and firm inan imperfect competition settings (Carlin and Soskice 1990)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 46/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Estimate of NAIRU
The Expectations-augmented Phillips curve, US 1981-2009 (expectations based on surveys of
expected inflation). Source: Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press,
Figure 15.6, p. 600. NB: in Hoover (2012) the inflation rate (π in our notation) is denoted by p.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 47/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Estimate of NAIRU
The Expectations-augmented Phillips curve, US 1981-2009 (expectations based on past inflation
rates) Source: Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, Figure 15.7,
p. 602. NB: in Hoover (2012) the inflation rate (π in our notation) is denoted by p.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 48/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
NAIRU as scaled output
A Phillips curve can be estimated with output as independent variable. If (πt − π∗t ) isregressed on scaled output (Yt/Yt), we get a NAIRU which is actually a rate ofpotential output (resource utilization) for which inflation is stable.
The Expectations-augmented Phillips curve, US 1981-2009 with scaled output as dependent
variable Source: Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, Figure
15.9, p. 604. NB: in Hoover (2012) the inflation rate (π in our notation) is denoted by p.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 49/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Is the NAIRU constant?
B According to the classical view (cfr. Friedman 1968), the level of theNAIRU (or n.r.) is determined by real supply-side influences only
i.e. demographics, technology, union power, structure of taxation,relative prices (e.g. oil prices)
and the NAIRU should not vary with monetary and fiscal policy
short-lived fluctuations, steep Phillips curve
B NAIRU seems to have changed, by looking at empirical estimations fordifferent time windows
In Europe (cfr. Italy but also UK) seems to have been risen
B The tendency of U to return to NAIRU is weak.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 50/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Estimate of changing NAIRU
The NAIRU for the United States 1949-2010 Source: Hoover (2012) Intermediate Macroeconomics,
Cambridge University Press, Figure 15.8, p. 604.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 51/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Hysteresis
B Many new Keynesians argue that there is no tendency for the economyto return to a NAIRU
hysteresis hypothesis: NAIRU depends on actual unemployment andon its history (path dependent)
thus aggregate demand can influence the NAIRU
B The term was introduced by Phelps (1972) and is borrowed fromphysics (magnetism)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 52/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Hysteresis
B Different interpretation of hysteresis
• conservative view: blame on unionisation and labour laws (in Europe)
• under this view it is difficult to explain rising unemployment in UK inthe 1980s and 1980s after reduction of union power
• lost of skills of unemployed people during long periods ofunemployment
Macroeconomic fluctuations 53/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Money and output in empirical applications
Macroeconomic fluctuations 54/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The effect of monetary shocks
B An important test to assess real-business-cycle vs. Keynesiantheories of fluctuations is based on the empirical analysis of theeffects of monetary changes.
• In the RBC approach purely monetary disturbances have no realeffects
• In Keynesian models monetary shocks have important effects onemployment and output
B Notice, however, that in Keynesian approach fiscal policy haspriority to monetary policy
B On the contrary Friedman: monetary policy is all that is needed
Macroeconomic fluctuations 55/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The St. Louis equation
B The relationship between money and output was empirically analysedmuch before the flourishing of the RBC approach
Cfr. Andersen and Jordan (1968) “Monetary and fiscal actions: a test oftheir relative importance in economic stabilization”, Federal Reserve Bankof St. Louis Review
straightforward idea: regress output on money
Macroeconomic fluctuations 56/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The St. Louis equation
B Example of St. Louis equation (from Romer 2012, p. 221)
US quarterly data 1960Q2-2008Q4
Yt real GDP, mt money stock as measured by M2
the estimated regression is
∆ log Yt = 0.0046 −0.09∆ log mt +0.18∆ log mt−1+(0.0024) (0.10) (0.12)
+0.16∆ log mt−2 +0.02∆ log mt−3 −0.02∆ log mt−4 +0.000010t(0.12) (0.12) (0.10) (0.000011)
R2= 0.056
sum of coefficients= 0.25 (s.e. 0.10)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 57/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Problems with the money-income correlation
B Causation may run Y −→ m instead of Y←− m (endogeneity problem)
cfr. King and Plosser (1984) “Money, credit, and prices in a RBC” AER
possible changes in the money stock (by firms and households) inadvance of output movements: the actual cause is output (changes inproduction or expenditures)
B Even if m −→ Y (money causes output) m can result to be uncorrelatedto Y if the central bank adjusts m to offset other factors influencing Y:we will observe fluctuations in m which are not associated withmovements in Y (cfr. Kareken and Solow 1963).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 58/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The narrative approach
B The narrative or natural experiments approach
• Friedman and Schwartz (1963) A Monetary History of the UnitedStates, 1867 - 1960, PUP
criticism by Tobin (1970), “Money and income: Post hoc ergo propterhoc?” QJE
• Romer C. and D. Romer (1989) “Does monetary policy matter? Anew test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz”, NBERMacroeconomics Annual
criticism by Hoover and Perez (1994), “Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc:An Evaluation of ’Does Monetary Policy Matter?’ in the Spirit ofJames Tobin” JME
Macroeconomic fluctuations 59/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The Structural VAR approach
B VAR approach pioneered by Sims (1980) “Macroeconomics and reality”Econometrica
VARs are Vector Autoregressions: a vector of variables is regressed onits lagged values (until a lag p)
all the variables are considered as endogenous
reduced form model
Macroeconomic fluctuations 60/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
The Structural VAR approach
B SVAR: structural form underlying the VAR
orthogonalisation of the VAR residuals
identification of the SVAR imposing causality restrictions on theestimated VAR
identification of the structural shocks in particular the monetary shock
analysis of the effect of this shock on output
empirical evidence shows that actually shocks to nominal variable playan important role, contrary to what the RBC theory predict
cfr. e.g. King Plosser Stock Watson (1991), “Stochastic trends and economicfluctuations” AER
Macroeconomic fluctuations 61/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Structural equations and causality
B Cowles Commission Approach: dominant approach inmacro-econometrics 1940s-1960s
• Haavelmo’s “The Probability Approach in Econometrics” (1944)
• Economic theory dictates the causal structure
• If the structure is adequate: error terms conform to standardprobabilistic properties (independence and normality)
• Measuring the strengths of causal linkages.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 62/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Example of structural model
B Example: (borrowed from Hoover 2006: 8ff.)
m = αy + εm (9)
y = βm + εy, (10)
where m ≡money, y ≡ GDP (both in logs).
B Statistical properties of εm and εy tell whether the model is goodsspecified.
B can we get α, β, εm, εy from the data?
B No. Problem of identification
B m and y are both endogenous variables
εm −→m←→ y←− εy
Macroeconomic fluctuations 63/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Example of structural model
B Problem of identification solved introducing two exogenousvariables:
m = αy + δr + εm (11)
y = βm + γp + εy, (12)
where r ≡ interest rate, p ≡ price level (both in logs).
B can we get α, β, δ, γ εm, εy from the data?
B Yes. Model identified under the assumption that p is not a directcause of m and r is not a direct cause of y
B Omitting the error terms:
r −→ m←→ y←− p
Macroeconomic fluctuations 64/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Reduced form model
B After substituting eq. (11) into eq. (12) and simplifying:
m =αγ
1− αβp +
δ
1− αβr +
α
1− αβεy +
11− αβ
εm (13)
y =γ
1− αβp +
βδ
1− αβr +
β
1− αβεm +
11− αβ
εy (14)
B This system of reduced-form equations can be now estimated,since on the r.h.s. there are only exogenous variables:
m = a p + b r + um (15)
y = c p + d r + uy (16)
B From the OLS estimates a, b, c, d, um, uy, using the respectivecorrespondences between eq. (13) (14) and (15) (16) it is possibleto recover α, β, γ, δ, εm, εy, i.e. parameter estimates of thestructural model.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 65/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Instrumental variables
B Notice that the structural-form coefficients (α, β in the ex.) couldbe equivalently obtained by instrumental variables estimation.
B Following the previous example:
• p: instrumental variable for eq. (9) (m = αy + εm)
• r: instrumental variable for eq. (10) (y = βm + εy)
B Two-stage least squares estimation for eq. (9):
1 OLS regression of y on p: obtain y
2 OLS regression of m on y: obtain αIV
Macroeconomic fluctuations 66/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
Identification of SVAR
B Problem of identification: from the estimate of the VAR
yt = A1yt−1 + . . . + Apyt−p + ut (17)
B we want to recover the SVAR (where W = I− Γ0):
Wyt = Γ1yt−1 + . . . + Γpyt−p + εt, (18)
yt = Γ0yt + Γ1yt−1 + . . . + Γpyt−p + εt, (19)
B more parameters in SVAR than in VAR.
B Notice that:
ut = W−1εt = Bεt (20)
• Knowing B (and all the parameters in 17) one can recover:• Γ0 = I− B−1
• Γ1 = B−1A1• . . .• Γp = B−1Ap
Macroeconomic fluctuations 67/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
MA representation
MA (moving average) representation of the VAR (understability):
yt = (I−A1L− . . .−ApLp)−1ut =∞
∑j=0
Φjut−j (21)
where Φ0 = I, Φi = ∑ij=1 AjΦi−j, for i = 1, 2, . . .
Since Γ0ut = εt
yt =∞
∑j=0
ΦjBB−1ut−j =∞
∑j=0
Ψjεt−j (22)
Ψj (k× k matrices): structural impulse response functions, theydescribe how structural shocks affect variables.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 68/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
King Plosser Stock Watson (1991), “Stochastic trends and economicfluctuations” American Economic Review
Empirical analysis using US quarterly data 1949:Q1-1988:Q4(1954:Q1-1988:Q4):
• c: per capita real consumption expenditures (logs);
• i: per capita gross private domestic fixed investment (logs);
• y: per capita private gross national product (logs);
• m: M2 (currency, demand deposits, and savings deposits, per capita inlogs);
• p: GNP implicit price deflator (logs);
• R: interest rate (the three-month U.S. Treasury bill rate).
Macroeconomic fluctuations 69/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
Three questions (King et al. 1991: p. 820):
• What are the cointegration properties of the data? Are these consistentwith the presence of a common stochastic (productivity) trend?
• How much variation of the main variables can be attributed to shocks tothe common stochastic trend?
• Do innovations associated with nominal variables explain importantvariation in the real variables?
Macroeconomic fluctuations 70/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
Theoretical background
• Real Business Cycle literature: Kydland-Prescott (1982).Cobb-Douglas production function:
Yt = AtK1−αt Lα
t
Total factor productivity following a random walk:
log At = µ + log At−1 + εt
• Solow (1957) model: per capita consumption, investment and output allgrow at the same growth rate in the steady state.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 71/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
Cointegration
• Two cointegrating relationships between (c, i, y):
the linear combination of c and y and the linear combination of iand y are I(0)
• Three cointegrating relationship between (c, i, y, m, p, R):
• one linking m− p, y and R (money demand)
• two linking the real ratios (c− y) and (i− y) with the real interestrates (R− ∆p)
Macroeconomic fluctuations 72/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
Estimation and identification
• Vector error correction model:
∆yt = Πyt−1 + F1∆yt−1 + . . . + Fp−1∆yt−p+1 + ut
• Long-run restrictions
Macroeconomic fluctuations 73/74
Okun’s law Phillips curve
King et al. 1991
Results
• Balanced-growth shock explains great variation in output in the threevariables (c, i, y) model.
• Much less in the six variables model.
• Permanent productivity shock is not able to account most of thebusiness cycles fluctuations.
Macroeconomic fluctuations 74/74