Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals...

18
Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals and QDROS Presented by: Robert M. Kaplan, CPC, QPA, CFP, APA VP, National Training Consultant Voya Financial Agenda Hardship Distributions QDROs Participant Loans Questions Hardship Distributions Optional under terms of plan document Plan may use “facts and circumstances” or “safe harbor” reasons Must be immediate and heavy financial need 401(k) regulations - §1.401(k) – 1(d)(3)

Transcript of Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals...

Page 1: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Advanced Issues With Participant Loans,

Hardship Withdrawals and QDROS

Presented by:

Robert M. Kaplan, CPC, QPA, CFP, APA

VP, National Training Consultant

Voya Financial

Agenda

• Hardship Distributions

• QDROs

• Participant Loans

• Questions

Hardship Distributions

• Optional under terms of plan document

• Plan may use “facts and circumstances”

or “safe harbor” reasons

• Must be immediate and heavy financial

need

• 401(k) regulations - §1.401(k) – 1(d)(3)

Page 2: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Polling Question #1

• Hardship distributions are not a

protected benefit and may be amended

out of a plan. Clients may want to

consider this during their current

restatement. Have you ever had a client

eliminate the hardship provision?

– Yes

– No

Hardship Distributions

• Amount may not exceed

amount needed to

satisfy hardship

– But may be trued up for

taxes and penalties

Hardship Distributions

• Safe Harbor definitions:

– Medical care deductible under Tax Code §213(d)

– Purchase of principal residence (excluding

mortgage payments)

– Post-secondary education (next 12 months)

– Prevent eviction or foreclosure from principal

residence

– Funeral expenses

– Casualty deduction home repairs

Page 3: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Hardship Distributions

• Principal residence

– IRS has opined:• Purchase of residence for family members but

NOT the employee would not be allowed

• Purchase of house from an ex-spouse would be

allowed

• These opinions were expressed at industry

functions and are not part of the regulations

Hardship Distributions

• Beneficiaries who incur hardship

may qualify

– Must be primary beneficiary

– Must be at time that the hardship

occurred (cannot change beneficiary

designation after the hardship)

– Applies to medical, education,

funeral expenses

Polling Question #2

• How often do you communicate to

clients that participant beneficiary

forms should be updated?– Never – not my job

– Only after we have a complicated situation

– Annually

– When documents are restated

Page 4: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Hardship Distributions

• Suspension of deferrals may apply– Plans that use “safe harbor”

– Must be six months for safe harbor match plans

– May be up to 12 months for other plans• Always see the plan document for verification

– Plans that use “facts and circumstances” do not have to require a suspension

• Note: Proposed Bill – “SEAL Act” would eliminate the suspension

Hardship Distributions

– Proof of hardship

• Not defined in regulations

• 2008 ASPPA Annual conference IRS stated

that Plan Administrator must have

“sufficient information to adjudicate a

claim – see regulations relating to Katrina”

• My advice – paperwork now can save a lot

of hassle after the fact if an audit or

questions occur

• See next slide for retention guidance

Hardship Distributions

– Retention of Records• IRS Bulletin 2015-4 reminded sponsors that they were

responsible for the records pertaining to loans and

hardships

• Relying on the participant or TPA in not in accordance

with IRS rules

• Beware of self-certification for the reason that the

hardship is being taken (not whether there are other

assets available)

Page 5: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Hardship Distributions

– Does an immediate and

heavy financial need

exist?

• For this part of the

process a plan

administrator may rely

on the representations

of the employee (and

not demand proof)

–Unless “knowledge to the

contrary”

Hardship Distributions

– Rules require that all

other distributions and

nontaxable loans from

all plans of same

employer be taken first

• This does not mean that

all plans must have a

loan provision

Hardship Distributions

– Loan does not have to be taken

if it will be “counterproductive”

• If it will increase hardship such as

preventing a third-party loan

(mortgage for primary residence)

or take home pay would be

lowered too much

• There is no criteria in regulations

for this

–Documentation should be kept

Page 6: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Hardship Distributions –

What to Do?????

� Participant is five months behind in mortgage payments

� Receives letter threatening foreclosure� Needs $5,000 for late payments, legal

fees and bank fees associated with foreclosure

� Real estate taxes of $1,800 are due next month

� Can’t make next two payments totaling $1,200

� Question: Can he take one hardship instead of three (to save on distribution expenses)

Hardship Distributions

� Plan Administrator needs to consider:� The 12 month in advance rule that applies to tuition

does not apply to other hardship reasons

� No specific IRS guidance on this matter

� If you allow two months –where is the line drawn, at

three, four, twelve?

� Need to look at the immediate and heavy financial

need. If Plan Administrator is comfortable that

documentation will be sufficient in an audit situation

� Bob’s caution – if the foreclosure has not been

threatened because of the taxes and future

payments the criteria may not be satisfied. How

threatening is the letter about future payments?

QDROs

� Brown vs. Continental Air Lines

� 5th Circuit Court of Appeals

� Sham divorces

� What is the responsibility of the Plan

Administrator in determining

whether a divorce is valid or not?

Page 7: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

QDROs

� Continental DB Plan

� Fear that company would go bankrupt and PBGC assumes responsibility for payouts

� Payouts for high income personnel could be slashed

� Cannot just “take money now” as no distributable event exists

� So what do to….????

QDROs

� D-I-V-O-R-C-E (not the Tammy Wynette song)

� Get a quick divorce and assign QDRO to alternate payees (90 to 100% of benefit)

� This creates a distributable event when one otherwise did not exist

� Note: Participants soon remarried and it appears they were living together “as a married couple” all along

QDROs

� Continental saw this as a sham divorce just to get money out of plan

� Court said that the Plan Administrator went beyond its authority� Merely has to determine on the surface if the order meets ERISA

rules

� It does not require or permit a plan to look further

� Participants win

� The court did not rule on whether a Plan Administrator could retroactively revoke a QDRO

Page 8: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

QDROs

� ERISA Advisory Opinion 99-13A

� Plan has the obligation to review the DRO for

reasonableness

� Could (or should) have warned the state agency of

the validness of it

� But not take action itself

Loans - Some Statistics

• 88% of plans allow for participant loans

• Coincidently, 88% of plans allow for hardship withdrawals (but not all the same plans)

• 24% of all 401(k) plan participants have at least one outstanding loan

Bankruptcy

• If a participant declares

personal bankruptcy –

do the participant loan

repayments continue?

Page 9: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Bankruptcy

• If a participant declares

personal bankruptcy – do

the participant loan

repayments continue?

• “Yes”

– The Bankruptcy Abuse

Prevention and Consumer

Protection Act of 2005

Bankruptcy

• Can I take a participant

loan, place it all in a bank

account, declare

bankruptcy and have it

protected?

Bankruptcy

• Can I take a participant

loan, place it all in a bank

account, declare

bankruptcy and have it

protected?

• “No” – per California court

case Friedman vs. Broach

Page 10: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Bankruptcy• What if the participant

wants to stop repaying loan

(they understand tax

consequences) – can they

ask to have salary reduction

repayments stopped?

Bankruptcy• What if the participant, who

declares bankruptcy, wants

to stop repaying loan (they

understand tax

consequences) – can they

ask to have salary reduction

repayments stopped?

• “No” – Section 523(a)(18) of

2005 Bankruptcy law does

not discharge the obligation

of a participant to a

retirement plan

Depositing Repayments• Salary reduction

repayments must be made

“as soon as administratively

feasible”

• Small plans (under 100

lives) may rely on the

proposed regulations for

elective deferrals that have

a 7 business day safe harbor

Page 11: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Leave of Absence

• Suspensions

– Plan may allow a suspension of

repayments for up to 12 months as long

as it does not go beyond original 5 year

period

• Approved leave (maternity for example)

–Strikes do not count as approved leave

• Layoff

• Note: interest still accrues

Leave of Absence - USERRA

• Suspensions

– USERRA – may extend beyond

5 year period for the time on

active duty

– Interest still accrues

– Interest rate may be capped

at 6% during military duty if

requested by participant

Deemed Distributions

• Cure period for missed payments –

last day of the calendar quarter

following the missed payment

Payment due – May 14, 2015

Cure period ends September 30, 2015

• Plan could default payment sooner –

see Loan Policy

Page 12: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Deemed Distributions

• Deemed distribution for tax purposes

= Principal and Interest until the

default date

– Therefore total taxable amount is more

than just the total of the missed

payments

• 10% penalty under 59 ½

Deemed Distributions

• Most plans use payroll withholding to

simplify the procedures and ensure

that the payments will be made

timely

• If the payroll department fails to set

up the withholding – it can still be a

problem for participant (Leonard vs.

IRS)

– There is an EPCRS correction

Deemed Distributions

• Defaulted Loans

• Don’t accrue interest, except

– To calculate loan maximums for

additional loan

– To repay with after-tax dollars

– Yes, loans are still due and payable even

after a taxable event

Page 13: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Deemed Distributions - Roth

• Roth defaults will never be

considered a “qualified distribution”

thus the earnings will be taxable and

subject to a 10% penalty, if applicable

Polling Question #3

• When do you start the 5 year clock

running on participant loans?

– The date the loan is requested

– The date the loan is distributed

– The date the first payment is due

– Whoops – I thought someone else would

do it

Offsets

• Loan is offset from

the participant

account only at the

time that a

participant has a

distributable event

Page 14: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Default or Offset

• Same participant

who defaulted takes

another participant

loan

– Require payroll

withholding, or

– Require additional

collateral

Refinancing

• Only if allowed by plan

• Reasons

– Interest rate

– Frequency of payments

– Extend loan to statutory

allowable (three year loan

extended to full five years)

– Additional funds

Refinancing

• Replacement loan is

treated as a new loan for

– Re-determine interest

rate and maximum limits

Page 15: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Refinancing• If new loan

repayments extend

beyond original 5

year payment period

then both the new

and old loans will

need to be taken into

account for the

maximum loan

amounts

Refinancing – Example I

• Old Loan = $11,000

• New Loan = $18,000

– Repay old loan and receive additional

$7,000

– New loan payable over a 5 year period re-

starting now

• Total loans = $11,000 + $18,000 =

$29,000

Refinancing – Example II

• Old Loan = $11,000

• New Loan = $18,000

– Repay old loan and receive additional

$7,000

– New loan will be repaid within the

original 5 year period of the Old Loan

• Total loans = $18,000

– You do not have to combine the two

limits

Page 16: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Refinancing – Example III

• Old Loan = $11,000

• New Loan = $18,000

– Repay old loan and receive additional $7,000

– New loan will be not repaid within the original 5

year period of the Old Loan

– Same result as taking a separate loan

• However, repayments will reflect $18,000

amortization until old loan 5 year period is up

and based on $7,000 loan until new 5 year

period is up

– Result is same as taking a new $7,000 loan but it

is accomplished in one loan and not two

Procedural Issues

• Spousal Consent – required when

plan is subject J & S rules– DOMA

• QDRO – loan is not assigned to

alternate payee – it remains in

entirety to the participant– DOMA

Procedural Issues

• Rollovers of Loans

• Allowed if:

– Distributing plan allows and in-kind

distribution

– Receiving plan allows loans

– Receiving plan allows rollovers

– Receiving plan allows rollovers of loans

– Note: Loans may not be rolled to IRAs

(including SIMPLE or SEP IRAs)

Page 17: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

Procedural Issues

• Common to have Mergers and

Acquisitions that affect plans

• How are your clients handling

when there are outstanding loans

– Are they allowing rollovers into

surviving plan

Redemption• EPCRS (Rev. Proc. 2013-12)

allows for correction of loan

operational errors

– More than maximum

– Longer than 5 years

– Defaults

– Not in plan document

Questions

• !

Page 18: Advanced Issues With Participant Loans, Hardship Withdrawals …asppavirtual.commpartners.com/files/SESSION_4... · 2015-05-14 · – Plans that use “safe harbor” – Must be

We’d Like to Thank Our Sponsors of

the 2015 ASPPA Virtual Conference