ADVANCE PAID Program Office of Academic Personnel Setting the UC Context for Issues of the Double...
Transcript of ADVANCE PAID Program Office of Academic Personnel Setting the UC Context for Issues of the Double...
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
Setting the UC Context for Issues of the Double Bind
Yolanda MosesAssociate Vice Chancellor for Diversity, Excellence,
and Equity & Professor of AnthropologyUC Riverside
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
Two Key Documents in the Double Bind Literature
1) (1976). Malcolm, Hall, and Brown. “The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science.” American Association for the Advancement of Science
2) (2011). Ong, Wright, Espinosa, and Orfield. “Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Harvard Educational Review
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
“The Double Bind” (1976)
• There is little information and no data on the status of women of color in science.
• Women of color in science were excluded from programs for underrepresented populations or programs for women because of biases related to both their race or ethnicity and gender, constituting a double bind.
• Programs for underrepresented populations were dominated by male scientists or majority women: “minority women were, in fact, falling somewhere in between the funded efforts to improve science opportunities for minorities and efforts to advance women in science.”
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
“The Double Bind” (1976)
• Conference attendees recommended that the educational system offer “only what the system already offers male students”: access to financial aid information, supportive student services, faculty role models, research training, counseling, and job placement services.
• Conference attendees recommended that employers institute flexible work schedules, financial and policy support for child care, grant writing education, career workshops, communication networks, mentoring, appointment to advisory councils, data collection by race and by gender.
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
“Inside the Double Bind” (2011)
• The “Double Bind” continues: “URM women remain proportionally underrepresented [in STEM] relative to their representation in the U. S. Population.”
• Inadequacy of programs: “history has borne out the reality that programs intended to serve women disproportionately benefit White women, and programs intended to serve minorities mainly benefit minority males.”
• The double bind remains as “the way in which race/ethnicity and gender function simultaneously to produce distinct experiences for women of color in STEM.”
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
“Inside the Double Bind” (2011)
• “The pernicious myth that women of color are under-represented in STEM fields because they are simply not interested in pursuing scientific careers continues to circulate.”
• Authors review research on undergraduate and graduate students; little research on the double bind for faculty in STEM.
• Support from peers and faculty are inadequate: “Young women of color in science have to carry out a tremendous amount of extra, and indeed, invisible work in order to gain acceptance from their male . . . peers and faculty.”
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
“Inside the Double Bind” (2011) Research shows several common characteristics across the
undergraduate, graduate, and faculty experience:
• Difficulties of transition and points of loss between the academic stages
• Critical role that climate plays in women’s retention in STEM, including issues of isolation, identity, invisibility, negotiating/navigation, microaggressions on a daily basis, sense of belonging, and tokenism
• “. . . Creating more women of color STEM PhDs and getting them into faculty positions could help foster cultural changes that would improve overall faculty support for and increase the enrollment and retention of minority women.”
ADVANCE PAID Program
Office of Academic Personnel
What Do We Need to Know About UC?• Some of the infrastructure problems found in the
educational system have been addressed, i.e. access to financial aid information, research training, and career counseling.
• Family friendly policies for faculty are in place.
• Each campus has in place a diversity/equity structure to support women of color.
• Data collection is underway to help us define successes, challenges, and next steps.
California HS Gradu-ates
UC Enrollees UC Bachelor's conferred UC Doctorate's con-ferred
African American 14,547 657 827 57
American Indian 1,706 129 144 9
Hispanic 90,627 4,004 4,099 130
Asian 27,966 6,580 9,493 245
White/Other 66,112 3,823 10,887 1,312
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
7% 4% 3% 3% 1%
1% 1% 1%
45%
27% 16%
7%
14% 43%
37%
14%
33%25%
43%
75%
From Students to Scholars:Female Headcount by Ethnicity
High School Graduates and UC Enrollees 2009-10Degrees Conferred 2010-11
White/OtherAsianHispanicAmerican IndianAfrican American
Sources: UC ADVANCE PAID Data Portfolio from the following tables: Pipeline Analysis of California Public High School Students to UC Enrollees, 2009-10 Number and Percent of Total UC Bachelor Degrees Conferred by Gender, Ethnicity, and Discipline - 2010-11 Number and Percent of Total UC Doctoral Degrees Conferred by Gender, Ethnicity, and Discipline - 2010-11
UC Faculty UC SBS Faculty UC STEM Faculty
African American 106 27 5
American Indian 31 9 3
Hispanic 177 40 26
Asian 444 72 124
White/Other 2,043 414 397
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
4% 5% 1% 1% 2% 1% 6% 7%
5%
16% 12% 22%
73% 74% 71%
UC tenure-line and equivalent Faculty, UC SBS Faculty, and UC STEM Faculty: Female Headcount by Ethnicity, Fall
2011
White/OtherAsianHispanicAmerican IndianAfrican American
Source: UC ADVANCE PAID Data Portfolio from the following tables: Ladder and Equivalent Rank Faculty with Tenure by Discipline by Gender by Ethnicity with percentagesUC Systemwide Female STEM Faculty by Ethnicity by Year UC Systemwide Female SBS Faculty by Ethnicity by Year
Applicants Interviewees Hires STEM Applicants STEM Intervie-wees
STEM Hires
Asian 0.203876413275673
0.188959660297241
0.177474402730376
0.270206545317363
0.227146814404432
0.220125786163522
Amer.-In-dian
0.00299588391601104
0.00530785562632694
0.00682593856655289
0.00132038102423843
0.00461680517082179
0
African-Amer.
0.0206585734382327
0.0244161358811041
0.037542662116041
0.0199943412241819
0.0240073868882735
0.0440251572327044
Hispanic 0.0493669567029646
0.0610403397027598
0.0784982935153584
0.0443742337074417
0.0535549399815328
0.0754716981132075
White/Oth 0.723102172667118
0.720276008492569
0.699658703071674
0.664104498726778
0.690674053554944
0.660377358490568
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
Ethnicity of Applicants, Interviewees and Hires for UC Faculty and UC STEM Faculty Positions, 2011-12
White/OthHispanicAfrican-Amer.Amer.-IndianAsian
Source: UC Systemwide Faculty Search Data Report for 2011-12
All Disciplines STEM Disciplines Only