Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

download Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

of 76

Transcript of Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    1/76

    Advanced Oil & Gas Exploration

    and Production Technology

    Course No: P07-001

    Credit: 7 PDH

    Gilbert Gedeon, P.E.

    Continuing Education and Development, Inc.9 Greyridge Farm CourtStony Point, NY 10980

    P: (877) 322-5800F: (877) 322-4774

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    2/76

    ENV I RONMENTA L B EN E F I T S

    of ADVANCED O I L and G A S E X P LO R AT I ON

    and P RODUCT I ON T E CHNO LOGY

    U. S . D E P A R T M E N T of E N E R G Y

    O F F I C E of F O S S I L E N E R G Y

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    3/76

    Better

    Wellbore

    Control

    Protection of

    Habitats,

    Wildlife, and

    Cultural

    Resources

    O I L A N D G A S I N D U S T R Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    Smaller

    Footprint

    Fewer Wells

    or

    Dry Holes

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    1 3-D Seismic

    2 4-D Visualization

    3 Remote Sensing

    4 Subsalt Imaging

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    5 CO2-Sand Fracturing

    6 Coiled Tubing

    7 Horizontal Drilling

    8 Hydraulic Fracturing

    9 Measurement-While-Drilling

    bl Modern Drilling Bits

    bm Multilateral Drilling

    bn Offshore Drilling

    bo Pneumatic Drilling

    bp Slimhole Drilling

    bq Synthetic Drilling Muds

    P R O D U C T I O N

    br Acid Gas Removal and Recovery

    bs Artificial Lift Optimization

    bt Coalbed Methane Recovery

    bu Freeze-Thaw/ Evaporation

    cl Gas-to-Liquids Conversion

    cm Glycol Dehydration

    cn Advanced Data Management

    co Improved Recovery Processes

    cp Leak Detection and Measurement Systems

    cq Low-Bleed Pneumatic Devices

    cr Offshore Platforms

    cs Downhole Oil /Water Separation

    ct Safety & Environmental Management Programs

    cu Vapor Recovery Units

    S I T E R E S T O R A T I O N

    dl Advanced Approaches to Site Restoration

    dm Rigs to Reefs

    dn Road Mix and Roadspreading

    S E N S I T I V E E N V I R O N M E N T S

    do DOE-BLM Partnership

    dp Coastal and Nearshore Operations

    dq Insulated Ice Pads

    dr North Slope Operations

    76 E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T S

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    4/76

    E X P L O R A T I O N A N D P R O D U C T I O N

    FA C T S H E E T SOptimized

    Recovery of

    Valuable Oil and

    Gas Resources

    Enhanced

    Worker

    Safety

    Reduced

    Greenhouse

    Gas Emissions

    (e.g., methane)

    Reduced Air

    Emissions

    (e.g., HAPs,

    NOx, PM)

    Reduced

    Power

    or Fuel

    Consumption

    Protection

    of Water

    Resources

    Reduced

    Waste

    Volumes

    The technologies described in these Fact Sheets are merely representative of the numerous advances in exploration and

    production technology over the last three decades and, as such, are not intended as an exhaustive inventory of these advances.

    O I L A N D G A S T E C H N O L O G Y 77

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    5/76

    Two decades of successively better geologic interpretationdemonstrate tangible results and environmental benefits

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    Advances in 3-dimensional

    (3-D) seismic technology

    over the past 25 years

    have enabled oil and gasproducers to evaluate

    prospects more effectively,

    drill fewer exploratory

    wells, and develop fields

    more efficiently. The result

    is decreased environmen-

    tal impact and increased

    profit. To establish a visual

    orientation of the subsur-

    face without drilling,

    energy waves directeddownward through the

    earths strata are reflected

    off the rock layers and

    sent back to the surface.

    The resulting data under-

    go complex processing

    and interpretation and

    provide explorationists

    with a 3-D visual charac-

    terization of the subsur-

    faces geological features.

    This allows detailed

    assessment of the oppor-

    tunities and risks of devel-

    oping a reservoir, an

    increasingly important

    capability as the search for

    resources pushes into new

    exploration frontiers, such

    as deepwater and subsalt

    formations.

    From 2-D to

    3-D technology

    U N TI L T HE ,developers had to relyon inaccurate, low-resolutionanalog data in planning theirexploration investments. Inthe s, improved -D seis-mic techniques enabledexplorers to characterize sub-surface opportunities withgreater effectiveness. Now,with -D seismic, they can

    establish more accurate -Dcharacterization of geologicstructures. Reservoir charac-terization is key across allstages of a hydrocarbon fieldslife. Seismic information,critical during the explorationand appraisal phase, is nowused for development until

    the field is abandoned. In thelast years, the discoverycost has decreased from per barrel with -D seismic tojust under per barrel with-D seismic. Better geologicrepresentations, coupled withadvanced drilling and pro-duction technologies, alsolead to increased recoveryefficiencies.

    Several major improvements

    in -D surveying occurredduring the , in seismicdata acquisition, processing,computer hardware, andinterpretation and display.Particularly remarkable havebeen the hardware improve-ments. Within the last fiveyears, recording systems have

    increased capacity from to, channels, as many as seismic data lines can berecorded in a single pass, andsatellite navigation systemshave evolved to pinpointaccurate positioning ofsources and receivers. At thesame time, technologicalimprovements have reducedcomputing time and loweredcosts. -D stack-time migra-tion can now be performed in

    a few hours on massively par-allel processors, and between and , costs droppedfrom million to millionfor a-square-mile surveyusing-D post-time depthmigration. By, costs foran equivalent survey areexpected to be near ,.

    3-D SeismicLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    More accurate exploratory well-siting reduces

    the number of dry holes and improves overall

    productivity per well drilled

    Less drilling waste is generated

    Better understanding of flow mechanics

    produces less water relative to oil and gas

    Overall impacts of exploration and production

    are reduced because fewer wells are required

    to develop the same amount of reserves

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Helps explorers to better identify oil and

    gas prospects

    More effective well placement improves

    development of resources

    Fewer dry holes ultimately reduces drilling and

    exploration costs

    Can substantially improve project economics

    by reducing overall drilling costs

    Exploration time relative to successful

    production is cut

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    6/76

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    7/76

    Evolving seismic technologies improve accuracy andinterpretation, allowing operations to be tailored toprotect the environment

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    Three-dimensional (3-D)

    seismic technology has

    revolutionized oil and gas

    exploration and served asa springboard to visualiza-

    tion technology. Now

    emerging visualization

    and 4-D time-lapse moni-

    toring technologies are

    improving interpretation

    of the data 3-D seismic

    imaging provides.

    Invaluable in locating

    bypassed reserves in exist-

    ing formations and discov-ering new resources, seis-

    mic reservoir characteriza-

    tion can now incorporate

    perceptual cues such as

    projection, lighting and

    shading, depth, motion,

    and transparency. This

    technology enables a

    more consistent, detailed

    picture of a complex for-

    mation. 4-D monitoring

    goes one step further,

    providing a dynamic

    picture of hydrocarbon

    flows and other reservoir

    changes over time,

    information valuable for

    both exploration and

    reservoir management of

    existing resources.

    Adding a fourth

    dimensiontime

    P E T RO L EU M E N GI-neers, geologists, andplanners have a far betterunderstanding of the geologicstructures of potential hydro-carbon-bearing formationsnow that reservoir images areprojected in three dimen-sions. Four are better still,largely due to DOE-supported

    research. A reservoirs fluidviscosity, saturation changes,temperature, and fluid move-ments can be analyzed bytime-lapse monitoring inthree dimensions. The time-lapse picture is built out ofdata re-recorded at intervals,compared and plotted bycomputer onto a-D model.Engineers can view changes

    occurring over time and linkthese to static and dynamicreservoir properties and pro-duction techniques. They canthen follow the consequencesof their reservoir managementprograms and make predic-tions as to the results offuture activities. -D monitor-ing is an offshoot of the com-puter processing techniquesdeveloped for -D seismic

    interpretation.

    With improved visualizationtechniques, petroleum engi-neers, geologists, and geo-physicists are integratingmany types and ages of data(well logs and productioninformation, reservoir tem-peratures and pressures, fluidsaturations, -D and -D

    seismic data) into time-lapseimagery and reservoir perfor-mance modeling. As thistime-dependent tool is correlated with physical dataacquisition, more accuratecharacterization of subsurfacereservoirs will be possible,pushing maximum recoveryefficiencies.

    Geologists and planners are

    better able to understand thestructure of promising forma-tions. As computing scienceadvances, further gains will bemade. Already, audio technol-ogy is being added, both forcontrolling images and pre-senting complex geologicaldata so that scientists canshare data in real time fromremote locations.

    4-D VisualizationLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Reduced drilling due to more successful siting

    of wells, with greater recovery from existing wells

    Less drilling waste through improved reservoir

    management

    Lower produced water volumes through better

    well placement relative to the oil/water interface

    in the formation

    Increased ability to tailor operations to protect

    sensitive environments

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Improved recovery due to precise placement of

    injector wells and infill drilling

    More efficient operations due to better

    identification of drainage patterns

    Lowered operating costs because of improved

    program timing and fewer dry holes

    Increased identification and ultimate recovery of

    as yet untapped resources

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    8/76

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    9/76

    Remote exploration helps pinpoint hydrocarbon resources,

    pollution sources, and sensitive environments

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    Used in conjunction with

    other exploratory tech-

    niques, such as 3-D seis-

    mic imaging, remote sens-ing systems detect and

    map concentrations of

    hydrocarbons with greater

    accuracy than other tech-

    nologies alone, and with

    less environmental

    impact. Technologies such

    as satellite imagery, aero-

    magnetic surveys, and

    gravimetry are now being

    applied by the largestexploration companies to

    attempt to detect the ver-

    tical or near-vertical

    migration of oil and gas to

    the earths surface and

    help identify promising

    geologic structures. These

    systems measure gases,

    solids, and liquids, using

    their physical properties to

    attenuate or reflect beams

    of electromagnetic energy.

    Resulting geophysical data

    are processed into easily

    understood images and

    maps, and form an inte-

    gral part of current

    onshore and offshore

    programs throughout

    the world.

    Enhanced satellite

    imaging systems

    O P T I CA L S AT E LL I TEimagery has been thepredominant source of datafor identifying and mappingonshore geology since theearly, when the firstLandsat Earth Observationsatellite was launched. Today,satellite imagery, onshore andoffshore, is also provided byradar satellites very sensitive

    to the earths surface con-tours. For example, varioustypes of satellites can seethrough feet of clear waterand up to feet beneath thesurface. Early optical satellitesdepended on visible or near-infrared light to collect energyreflected from the earthssurface. By contrast, radar

    satellites emit energy atmicrowave frequencies,enabling them to acquireimagery under nearly anyatmospheric condition.Sophisticated digital imageprocessing systems can nowconvert and sort raw satellitedata into thematic maps thatpoint to the location of pro-ductive formations, evendetecting oil and gas seepagesthat indicate migration path-

    ways from undrilled traps.Similarly, remote sensingtechniques can also identifyhydrocarbon spills and leaksin remote areas, such as alongpipelines.

    Current multispectral satel-lites such as the LandsatThematic Mapper create

    images by gathering up toseven bands of light spectra inprism-like fashion. In ,when the U.S. Navy plans tolaunch its Navy EarthMapObserver satellite, an excitingnew satellite technologycalled hyperspectral analysis,accessing upwards ofbands of light, will furtherincrease imaging accuracy.

    Improved aeromagnetic

    surveysInitially developed for mili-tary applications, aeromag-netic surveying has evolvedinto a productive explorationtechnology that can recognizethe magnetic signature ofpotential hydrocarbon-bearingbasins from altitudes over, feet. Using a

    Remote SensingLocations: Worldwide (especially deepwater)

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Accurate identification of fragile ecosystems,

    enabling care when drilling

    Increased ability to address environmental needs

    Fewer dry holes and nonproductive exploratory

    wells are drilled

    Improved characterization of earths natural

    systems

    Identification of spills and leaks in remote areas

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Increased exploratory success rates

    Dramatically reduced exploratory costs

    Access to geological data otherwise

    unobtainable

    Increased recovery of resources from frontier

    basins

    Identification of hydrocarbon seeps as

    distinguished from oil spills or pollution

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    10/76

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    Corbley, K. Landsat ImagesAssist in Mapping Caspian

    Bathymetry. Oil & Gas Journal

    Offshore, 7/1/97.

    Detecting the Sleeping Giants of

    the Caspianfrom Space.

    Offshore Magazine, 7/1/98.

    Koger, D., and R. Dodge. Geosat

    Starts Up R&D on Exploration

    Sector. Oil & Gas Journal,

    10/5/98.

    Petzet, G. Explorers LookToward Better Remote Sensing

    Data. Oil & Gas Journal, 3/9/98.

    Remote Sensing Terminology.

    Journal of the Air and Waste

    Management Assoc., 11/91.

    Wagner, M. Radar Imaging

    Matched with Gravity and

    Bathymetry. Oil & Gas Journal

    Offshore, 5/1/98.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    magnetometer mounted on

    a magnetically cleaned air-craft, explorers are success-fully mapping sedimentaryanomalies critical to oil andgas exploration, detectingsalt/sediment contact, min-eralized shear zones, andintrasedimentary markers.

    Recent improvements inmagnetometer design, digi-tal signal processing tech-niques, and electronic navi-gation technologies, incombination with fastersampling of the magneticfield and the use of moredetailed survey grids, allowmapping of subtle magneticsignatures. These advancesimprove the interpretationand visualization ofgeological data.

    Measuring gravity to gauge

    resourcesGravimetry measurement isnow derived from bothsatellite and airborne obser-vations. Gravity anomaliescan be measured andmapped to give geoscientistsan idea of the size anddepth of the geologicalstructures that caused them.

    Satellite gravity imaging

    uses radar to measure undu-lations in the sea surfacethat reflect density varia-tions in the earths uppercrust. This technologyenables mapping of areas ofmass deficit, where sedi-mentary deposition is likelyto have occurred. Identifi-cation of such areas givesexplorers a better idea ofwhere hydrocarbons may belocated.

    Putting it all together

    Exploration companies likeBP Exploration, Exxon,Mobil, Texaco, Unocal, andRTX are tailoring theirremote sensing programs tocombine technologies asneeded. Recent advancesin radar imaging andsophisticated image-process-ing packages, combined

    with satellite-derived gravityand bathymetry data, forexample, present newopportunities to use remotesensing for deepwaterexploration. Remote sensingis now considered critical tosuch operations. It is alsoextraordinarily cost-effective.

    Satellites help explore in the Caspian Sea

    After water-level changes along the shallow coast of the Republicof Kazakhstan made their bathymetric maps obsolete, Oryx

    Energy and its exploration partner, Exxon, turned to remotesensing to gauge depths. Water depth fluctuations caused by

    wind can make movement of seismic and drilling equipmentchallenging. With satellite image processing technology, the teamcreated new bathymetric maps (e.g., the , square kmMertvyi Kultuk block, some km south of the giant Tengiz field)and used these maps to position a successful new drilling programin one of the worlds most productive oil exploration areas.

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Edith C. Allison

    (202) 586-1023

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    Russia

    Azerbaijan

    Iran

    Turkmenistan

    Kazakhstan

    Caspian

    Sea

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    11/76

    Interpretation of formations hidden under layers of salt

    allows more accurate siting of new reserves

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    Now that most easily

    accessible domestic

    resources have been dis-

    covered, oil and gasexplorers are investigating

    the promising but more

    inaccessible resources

    beneath saltsheet forma-

    tions in the Gulf of

    Mexico. Large, irregular

    saltsheets may cover 60

    percent of the slope

    beneath the Outer

    Continental Shelf in the

    Gulf and are foundthroughout the world.

    Advances in 3-D imaging

    technologies are crucial to

    providing reliable images

    of what lies below the

    thick layers. A 3-D

    prestack depth migration

    method of seismic data

    processing and an advanced

    marine magnetotellurics

    technique are now making

    it possible to image the

    structure and thickness of

    subsalt sediments.

    Together, these technolo-

    gies provide sufficient

    information to help locate

    new oil or gas deposits,

    estimated at 15 billion bar-

    rels of oil equivalent in the

    Gulf of Mexico alone.

    Getting under the salt

    DE V EL O PI N G I M AG E Sof subsalt structuresposes a critical challenge toexploration. Seismic imagingis based on the transmissionof sound waves and analysisof the energy that is bouncedback. But large amounts ofenergy are lost when soundwaves pass through salt; thus,an extremely strong seismicsource is required. Often seis-

    mic data are incomplete, pre-venting explorers fromobtaining accurate readings ofa structures shape and thick-ness. Traditional imagingmethods cannot deliver accu-rate readings when seismicsources are blocked by saltsqueezed into sheets betweensediment layers from anunderlying salt base. The oiland gas sandwiched betweenthe salt layers can only be

    imaged by a combination ofadvanced seismic source tech-nology, complex mathemati-cal modeling simulations, andimproved data processing andimaging techniques. DOEspublic/private Natural Gas andOil Technology Partnershiphas helped develop severalsuch technologies, amongthem improvements to thespeed and reliability of-Dprestack depth migration,

    which creates a coherent imageby processing as many as million records.

    Using electromagnetic

    resistance

    As a part of this DOE part-nership, the NationalLaboratories and industry arecurrently investigating thefeasibility of marine magne-totellurics, which is ideal forsubsalt exploration since it is

    based on electrical resistance.Because salts resistivity is times greater than that ofsurrounding sediments, thecontrast between salt and sed-iment resistance to low-fre-quency electromagnetic radia-tion from the earths ionos-phere makes it easier to mapthe extent and thickness ofsalt structures.

    Stealth imaging breakthrough

    The latest technology usedto enhance seismic data is-D full tensor gradient (FTG)imaging, originally developedby the U.S. Navy during theCold War for stealth sub-marines. A-D gradiometersurvey takes real-time mea-surements of very smallchanges in the earths gravityfield, each relaying informa-tion directly related to massand geometry of subsurface

    Subsalt ImagingLocations: Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, and other salt formations

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Increased resource recovery due to better

    reservoir characterization

    Better, more careful siting of new drilling

    operations

    Reduced drilling wastes as fewer wells are

    drilled

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    More efficient exploration to pinpoint new oil

    and gas, reducing the financial risks

    Cost-effective exploration: an average 30-image

    seismic survey costs $500,000, while an MT sur-

    vey covering the same area costs about $50,000

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    12/76

    E X P L O R A T I O N

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Edith C. Allison

    (202) 586-1023

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    C O N T A C T

    Camp, W., and D. McGuire.Mahogany Field, A Subsalt

    Legend: A Tale of Technology,

    Timing, and Tenacity. Houston

    Geological Society Bulletin,

    10/97.

    Coburn, G. 3D Full Tensor

    Gradient Method Improves

    Subsalt Interpretation. Oil & Gas

    Journal, 9/14/98.

    Cold War Stealth Technology

    Can Aid Seismic Interpretation.

    Journal of Petroleum

    Technology, 1/98.

    Earth View Associates. SubsaltExploration Methods

    Information Brochure.

    Hoverston, G., et al.

    Magnetotellurics for Petroleum

    Exploration. Case for Sea MT.

    Minerals Management Service.

    Gulf of Mexico OCS Region,

    Subsalt Exploration.

    Petzet, G. Anadarko Find,

    Technology Gains Renew

    Subsalt Hopes. Oil & Gas

    Journal, 8/17/98.

    Prutzman, J., and G. Coburn.Technology Pinpoints Base of

    Salt. The American Oil & Gas

    Reporter, 7/98.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Beneath the Mahogany field salt

    Drilling beneath the salt formations of the Gulf of Mexico, anexploration play spanning, square miles south of theLouisiana coast, began in the . A decade of unsuccessfulexploration followed, and it took advanced subsalt technologies tobreak through the visual block. Nine subsalt discoveries weredrilled in the play from to , representing a phenomenalsuccess rate of percent. The centrally located Mahogany field(the Gulf s first commercial subsalt play) was discovered in ,and four wells were completed by, now flowing at a daily rateof, barrels of oil and million cubic feet of gas. Mahoganyfields total reserves are estimated at million barrels of oil-equivalent, and total recovery from this and the Gulf s other sub-

    salt discoveries is estimated to be million energy equivalentbarrels, resources that would have remained inaccessible withoutadvanced subsalt imaging technology. A new discovery, theTanzanite field, is estimated to hold reserves of million barrelsof oil-equivalent. Due to the size of this discovery, subsalt explo-ration in the Gulf is likely to remain active. Future subsalt technol-ogy advances may be the key to discovering other large untappedfields. As technology progresses, so will resource recovery.

    geological bodies. FTG pro-

    vides the depth and shapeof almost any geologicalstructure, independent ofseismic velocities, allowinggeoscientists to developmore complete images ofcomplex salt formations.Two field tests have

    demonstrated a significantly

    improved view of the Gulfssubsalt geology, and FTGpromises to be an affordabletool with which to enhanceexisting-D seismic imagingtechnology in salt forma-tions around the world.

    SPE, 1993

    United States

    Gulf ofMexico

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    13/76

    In widespread use in Canada, a stimulation techniquenow successfully demonstrated in the U.S. has outstandingresults without formation damage

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Fracturing has been widely

    used since the 1970s to

    increase production from for-

    mations with low permeability

    or wellbore damage. Unlike

    conventional hydraulic and

    acid fracturing techniques,

    CO2-sand fracturing stimu-

    lates the flow of hydrocar-

    bons without the risk of for-

    mation damage and without

    producing wastes for dispos-

    al. A mixture of sand prop-

    pants and liquid CO2 is forced

    downhole, where it creates

    and enlarges fractures. Then

    the CO2 vaporizes, leaving

    only the sand to hold the

    fracture openno liquids,

    gels, or chemicals are used

    that could create waste or

    damage the reservoir. Any

    reservoir that is water-

    sensitive or susceptible to

    damage from invading fluids,

    gels, or surfactants is a candi-

    date. The process has had

    widespread commercial

    success in Canada, and

    recent DOE-sponsored field

    tests have demonstrated

    commercial feasibility in the

    United States.

    Using CO2 to fracture

    oil and gas reservoirs

    RE C OM P LE T IN G A N Dfracturing an existing oilor gas well to stimulate produc-tion that has declined over timeis significantly less costly thandrilling a new well. First used inthe mid-, fracturing treat-ments inject fluids under highpressure into the formation,creating new fractures and

    enlarging existing ones.Proppants (usually large-grained sand or glass pellets) areadded to the fluid to supportthe open fractures, enablinghydrocarbons to flow morefreely to the wellbore.Fracturing is widely used tostimulate production indeclining wells and to initiateproduction in certain

    unconventional settings.More than one million frac-turing treatments were per-formed by, and about to percent of existing wellsare hydraulically fractured atleast once in their lifetime.More than eight billion bar-rels of additional oil reserveshave been recovered throughthis process in North Americaalone. Yet conventional frac-

    turing technology has draw-backs. The water- or oil-basedfluids, foams, and acids usedin traditional fracturingapproaches can damage theformationfor instance, bycausing clay in the shale toswelleventually pluggingthe formation and restrictingthe flow of hydrocarbons.Conventional fracturing also

    produces wastes requiringdisposal.

    An advanced CO2-sand frac-turing technology overcomesthese problems, and is prov-ing a cost-effective process forstimulating oil and gas pro-duction. First used in bya Canadian firm, the processblends proppants with percent liquid CO2 in a

    closed-system-pressurized ves-sel at a temperature ofFand a pressure of psi.Nitrogen gas is used to forcethe resulting mixture throughthe blender to the suctionarea of the hydraulic fracturepumping units and thendownhole, where it createsand enlarges fractures. TheCO2 used in the process

    CO2-Sand FracturingLocations: Canada (commercial) and United States (demonstration only)

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Using liquid CO2 creates long, propped frac-

    tures without formation damage

    No wastes requiring disposal are created

    Conventional fracturing gels and chemicals,

    which may damage the flow path between

    wellbore and formation, are not used

    Groundwater resources are protected

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Eliminates hauling, disposal, and maintenance

    costs of water-based systems

    Can significantly increase well productivity and

    ultimate recovery

    CO2 vaporization leads to fast cleanup, whereas

    water-based fluids sometimes clean up slowly,

    reducing cash flow

    Recovery of valuable oil and gas is optimized

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    14/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    C O N T A C T

    Arnold, D. Dry Frac Damage

    Control. PTTC Network News,

    2nd Quarter 1997.

    Arnold, D. Liquid CO2 and Sand:

    An Alternative to Water-Based

    Stimulation Fluids. Harts

    Petroleum Engineer

    International, 1/98.

    DOE, Office of Fossil Energy.

    Fracturing Gas/Oil Formations

    with Reservoir Friendly

    Carbon Dioxide and Sand.

    Investments in Fossil Energy

    Technology.

    Petroleum Technology Transfer

    Council. Needed: Demonstration

    Sites for New Stimulation

    Process. PTTC Network News,

    2nd Quarter 1997.

    Raymond, Johnson, et al. CO2

    Energized and Remedial 100%

    CO2Treatments Improve

    Productivity in Wolfcamp

    Intervals. Val Verde Basin,

    West Texas, SPE 39778, 1998.

    Yost II, Mazza, and Remington II.

    Analysis of Production Response

    to CO2/Sand Fracturing: A Case

    Study. SPE 29191, 1994.

    1995 National Assessment of

    United States Oil and Gas

    Resources. USGS Circular 1118,

    U.S. Government Printing Office.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Increased Gas Production per Well

    Results of fracturing technique tests

    in Devonian Shales wells after

    37 months

    600%0%

    CO2-Sand vs.

    Nitrogen Gas

    (no proppant)

    CO2-Sand vs.

    Nitrogen Foam

    (with proppant)

    400 %

    200%

    vaporizes, leaving behind a

    dry, damage-free proppantpack. The technology hasgained widespread commer-cial acceptance in Canada,where it has been used some, times. In the UnitedStates, use has been limitedto demonstrationsmanysponsored and cofunded byDOEtaking place overthe last two years in aboutwells in Kentucky, Ohio,Pennsylvania, Tennessee,Texas, New York, Colorado,and New Mexico.

    CO2-sand fracturing treat-

    ments average from ,to ,, depending onwell depth and rock stresses.While often higher-costthan conventional methods,these costs are offset by sav-ings realized through elimi-nating both swab rigs andthe hauling, disposal, andmaintenance costs associat-ed with water-based sys-tems. As in conventionalfracturing, CO2-sand treat-ments can significantlyincrease a formations pro-duction and profitability.

    M E T R I C S

    Source: Arnold, Harts Petroleum Engineer International, January 1998

    Successful DOE-sponsored field testsThe U.S. Geological Survey estimates that to trillioncubic feet of natural gas resources exists in unconventional set-tings in the United States. Developing cost-effective advancedfracturing techniques is crucial in our quest to recover theseresources. A number of field-test fracturing projects sponsored byDOE recently evaluated and proved CO2-sand technologys effec-tiveness in gas recovery. In the Devonian Shales in Kentucky, fourof gas wells were stimulated with CO2-sand mixture, seven

    with nitrogen gas and no proppant, and four with nitrogen foamand proppant. After producing months, wells stimulated withthe CO

    2-sand process had produced four times as much as those

    treated with foam, and twice as much as those stimulated withnitrogen gas. In central Pennsylvania, three gas wells were stimu-lated using CO2-sand fracturing. Immediately after fracturing,two of the wells exhibited production increases of, percentand percent. Over a year and a half later, production fromthe wells had increased percent, percent, and per-cent, respectively.

    s Major areas of oil

    and gas potential

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    15/76

    Successively better coiled tubing technologies drive

    improvements in cost, productivity, and efficiency of

    drilling operations, while reducing environmental impact

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Continuous coiled tubing

    can dramatically increase

    the efficiency, profitability,

    and productivity of drillingfor oil and gas. Whereas in

    conventional drilling oper-

    ations, the drilling pipe

    consists of several jointed

    pieces requiring multiple

    reconnections, a more

    flexible, longer coiled pipe

    string allows uninterrupted

    operations. A cost-effec-

    tive alternative for drilling

    in reentry, underbalanced,and highly deviated wells,

    coiled tubing technology

    minimizes environmental

    impacts with its small

    footprint, reduced mud

    requirements, and quieter

    operation. Quick rig set-

    up, extended reach in hori-

    zontal sidetracking, one-

    time installation, and

    reduced crews cut operat-

    ing costs significantly. For

    multilateral and slimhole

    reentry operations, coiled

    tubing provides the oppor-

    tunity for extremely

    profitable synergies.

    A strong portfolio of benefits

    P A RT I CU L A R LY VA LU-able in sensitive environ-ments such as Alaskas NorthSlope, coiled tubing technol-ogy has far less impact on adrilling site than conventionalequipment, in addition toperforming drilling opera-tions more efficiently andcost-effectively. Although thefirst coiled tubing units were

    built in the , only afterrapid technological advancesin the late did the tech-nology start to gain industry-wide recognition. From

    operating units in , usagehas grown to some unitsin , and many drillingcompanies are now revisingtheir rig portfolios.

    In a variety of drilling appli-cations, coiled tubing elimi-nates the costs of continuousjointing, reinstallation, andremoval of drilling pipes. It isa key technology for slimhole

    drilling, where the combina-tion can result in significantlylower drilling costsa typical,-foot well drilled insouthwest Wyoming costs

    about ,, but withcoiled tubing and slimhole,the same well would cost, less.

    Reduced working spaceabout half of what is requiredfor a conventional unitis animportant benefit, as arereduced fuel consumption andemissions. A significant drop innoise levels is also beneficial in

    most locations. The noise levelat a,-foot radius is decibels, while at the sameradius a conventional rig has a-decibel level.

    Coiled TubingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Reduced mud volumes and drilling waste

    Cleaner operations, as no connections to leak mud

    Reduced operations noise

    Minimized equipment footprints and easier site

    restoration

    Reduced fuel consumption and emissions

    Less visual impact at site and less disturbance,

    due to speedy rig set-up

    Reduced risk of soil contamination, due to

    increased well control

    Better wellbore control

    E N V I R O N M E NT A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Increased profits, in certain cases, from 24-hour

    rig set-up and faster drilling

    Smaller drilling infrastructure and more

    stable wells

    No interruptions necessary to make connections

    or to pull production tubing

    Reduced waste disposal costs

    Reduced fuel consumption

    Increased life and performance from new rig

    designs and advanced tubulars, reducing

    operating costs

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    16/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    C O N T A C T

    Adams, L., and C. Overstreet.

    Coiled Tubing Facilitates Deep

    Underbalanced Workover. Oil &

    Gas Journal, 3/31/97.

    Berning, Isennock, and Coats.

    Composites Extend CTs

    Applications. The American Oil

    & Gas Reporter, 9/98.

    Electric Coiled-Tubing Drilling.

    Journal of Petroleum

    Technology, 9/98.

    Faure, A., and J. Simmons.

    Coiled Tubing Drilling: A Means

    to Minimize Environmental

    Impact. SPE Paper 27156, 1994.

    Furlow, W., Lake Maracaibos

    Depleted Fields Continue to

    Produce. Offshore Magazine,

    9/1/98.

    Kunkel, B. Benefits Fuel CT

    Growth. Harts Petroleum

    Engineer International, 7/97.

    Newman, K. Coiled Tubing

    Technology Continues Its Rapid

    Growth. World Oil, 1/98.

    Schutz, R., and H. Watkins.

    Titanium Alloys Extend

    Capabilities of Specialty

    Tubulars Arsenal. The American

    Oil & Gas Reporter, 9/98.

    Strunk, C. Slim Hole, Coiled

    Tubing Combine to Enhance

    Well Economics. The American

    Oil & Gas Reporter, 2/97.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    M E T R I C S

    Field trials in the Netherlands

    demonstrate environmental benefits

    Fuel Consumption and Gas Emissions:

    Coiled Tubing vs. Conventional Rigs

    Med Land Coiled Tubing

    Workover Drilling Drilling

    Rig Rig Unit

    Diesel m3/month 35 160 25

    Gas CO2 3,293 15,055 2,122

    Emissions CO 3.7 16.8 2.5

    kg/day NOx 4.6 21 2.1

    HC 3.9 17.8 2.8

    HC (Gas) 1.8 8.4 1.1

    SO2 4.2 19.4 2.2

    180

    160

    140

    120

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    Conductor Tophole

    Intermediate Reservoir

    Completion

    Conventional Coiled Tubing

    Conventional drilling fluids volume com-

    pared with coiled tubing volumes (m3)

    At Lake Maracaibo field

    Advanced coiled tubing drilling is helping operators optimizeresource recovery at Venezuelas Lake Maracaibo field. BakerHughes INTEQs first-of-its kind Galileo II hybrid drilling barge,containing-inch coiled tubing and slimhole drilling measure-ment-while-drilling tools, drilled its first well at the end of.It was the first time an underbalanced well had been drilled onLake Maracaibo, and it promises good results. Galileo IIs uniquedesign is also expected to significantly increase the life of its coiledtubing, ultimately reducing operating costs. Operating in a fragilelake ecosystem presents unique waste management challenges,

    and all drill cuttings and waste mud are transported back to shorefor disposal.

    Technology advances

    in the 90sDramatic advances haverecently brought new coiledtubing technology to mar-ket. For example, newdesigns from leadingdrilling service companieshave eliminated coiledtubing rigs guide arches; inthese new designs, eliminat-ing the bending in the tub-ing at the guide arch hassignificantly increased its

    life. The newest advance isan electric bottomholeassembly offering immedi-ate data feedback on bot-tomhole conditions,reduced coiled tubingfatigue, maintenance of bitspeed independent of flowrate, and improved reliabili-ty. New materials likeadvanced titanium alloysand advanced metal-free

    composites have improvedthe reliability, performance,corrosion-resistance, weight,and cost-effectiveness ofcoiled tubing assemblies. Incertain cases, titanium tub-ing offers an estimated reel-ing cycle life to timesgreater than steel. SPE 27156, 1994

    Photo: WZI, Inc.

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    17/76

    Without any increase in environmental impact, horizontal

    drilling allows developers to reach reserves beyond the

    limits of conventional techniques

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Horizontal drilling targets

    oil or gas in thin, tight

    reservoirs, reservoirs inac-

    cessible by vertical drilling,and reservoirs where hori-

    zontal wellbores signifi-

    cantly increase flow rates

    and recovery. Horizontal

    wells maximize utilization

    of drilling sites and infra-

    structure. While vertical

    wells drain oil from a sin-

    gle hole and have limited

    contact with oil-bearing

    rock, horizontal wells pen-etrate a greater cross-

    section of the formation,

    allowing substantially

    more oil to drain. A hori-

    zontal well is drilled later-

    ally from a vertical well-

    bore at an angle between

    70 and 110. It can tap the

    hydrocarbon supplies of a

    formation without further

    environmental distur-

    bance, of particular value

    in sensitive areas.

    Breaking geologic barriers

    T H E C UR REN T B OO Min horizontal drilling isdue to rapid developments intechnology over the past twodecades. Although severalhorizontal wells were success-fully drilled between the and , these were limitedto expensive - to -footforays. Interest waned in suchonshore applications after thedevelopment of hydraulicfracturing technology madevertical wells more productive.The offshore industry contin-ued to pursue horizontaldrilling, but the limitations ofthe available equipment oftenresulted in ineffective, expen-sive, and time-consumingdrilling operations.

    In the mid-, several sig-nificant technology advancesstarted breaking down thesebarriers. Steerable downholemotor assemblies, measure-ment-while-drilling (MWD)tools, and improvements inradial drilling technologieswere the breakthroughs need-ed to make horizontal drillingfeasible. Short-radius technol-ogy had been developed in the, the earliest curvaturetechnique used to drill laterals;in the , long-radius tech-nology allowed lateral dis-placement away from the rigto penetrate the reservoir.Then, in the , medium-radius techniques permittedre-drilling horizontal intervalsfrom existing wellbores, andwith this advance producerscould build rapidly to a

    angle. Today, horizontalwells are being drilled longerand deeper, in more hostileenvironments than ever before.

    Horizontal drilling is nowconventional in some areasand an important componentof enhanced recovery pro-jects. At any given time, hori-zontal drilling accounts for to percent of the U.S. landwell count. The Austin Chalkfield has been the site of over percent of the onshorehorizontal rig count since thelate , and still accountsfor the majority of horizontalpermits and rig activity in theU.S. today. Thirty percent ofall U.S. reserves are in car-bonate formations, and it ishere that percent of hori-zontal wells are drilled.

    Horizontal DrillingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Less impact in environmentally sensitive areas

    Fewer wells needed to achieve desired level of

    reserve additions

    More effective drilling means less produced water

    Less drilling waste

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Increased recoverable hydrocarbons from a

    formation, often permitting revitalization of

    previously marginal or mature fields

    More cost-effective drilling operations

    Less produced water requiring disposal and less

    waste requiring disposal

    Increased well productivity and ultimate recovery

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    18/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    Cooper, S., and R. Cuthbertson.Horizontal, Underbalanced Wells

    Yield High Rates in Colombia.

    World Oil, 9/98.

    Department of Energy. Using

    Horizontal Drilling to Give a

    Michigan Oilfield New Life.

    Deskin, W. et al. Survey Shows

    Successes, Failures of Horizontal

    Wells. Oil & Gas Journal, 6/19/95.

    Gas Research Institute.

    Measuring the Impact of

    Technology Advances in the

    Gulf of Mexico.

    Horizontal Well SuccessfullyDrilled in Black Warrior Basin.

    Oil & Gas Journal, 7/22/96.

    Knoll, R. Buzzwords Can Lead to

    Poor Results. The American Oil

    & Gas Reporter, 9/98.

    Mason, R. Horizontal Drilling

    Broadening Mindset, Opening

    New Possibilities. The American

    Oil & Gas Reporter, 9/98.

    Natural Petroleum Council. The

    Potential for Natural Gas in the

    United States, 12/92.

    Philips, C., and D. Clarke. 3DModeling/Visualization Guides

    Horizontal Well Program in

    Wilmington Field. Journal of

    Canadian Petroleum

    Technology, 10/98.

    Potter, N. 3D, Horizontal Drilling

    Changing Clair Development

    Economics. Offshore Magazine,

    5/1/98.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    of, barrels. Success has spawned the drilling of nine otherhorizontal wells here, and nearly others in geologically similarfields in the basin. If successful in other depleted Dundee fields,horizontal wells could produce an additional to millionbarrels of oil, worth about million in tax revenues alone.

    In the United States, according to a recent

    DOE study, horizontal drilling has improved:

    Potential reserve additionsby an estimated 10 billion barrels of oil equivalent,

    nearly 2% of original oil-in-place

    The average production rationow 3.2:1 for horizontal compared to vertical

    drilling based on field data, even though the average cost ratio is 2:1

    Carbonate numbers are even betterproduction is nearly 400% greater than verti-

    cal wells, yet costs are only 80% more

    Worldwide Horizontal Wells

    3,000

    2,500

    2,250

    2,000

    1,750

    2,750

    1,500

    1,250

    Pre-1988

    1988 1990 19911989 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

    1,000

    500

    250

    750

    0

    Number of Horizontal Wells

    Success in the Black Warrior Basin

    In , after six years of production, the Goodwin gas field in theBlack Warrior Basin was converted to gas storage by the MississippiValley Gas Co. Only conventional vertical wells had been drilledin the thin ( feet), tight, abrasive formation. The operatorsuccessfully drilled and completed the first horizontal well in only days, utilizing MWD and gamma ray tools, a short radiusmotor, and a polycrystalline diamond bit. Overall costs approachedtwice that of a conventional well in the field, but the deliverabilityof the horizontal well was six times that of a vertical well. Since onehorizontal well is producing the equivalent of six vertical wells,maintenance and operating costs are lower, and fewer meter runs,flowlines, and other facilities are required.

    New reserves in the Dundee Formation

    Only percent of the known oil located in the Michigan BasinsDundee Formation had been produced when a DOE co-sponsoredhorizontal drilling project brought new life to the formationsexhausted Crystal field. The new horizontal well now producesnearly times more than the best conventional well in its field barrels of oil a dayand boasts estimated recoverable reserves

    M E T R I C S

    Source: U.S. Department of Energy and Maurer Engineering, Inc., 1995

    Source: Oil & Gas Journal, November 23, 1998

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    s Major areas of oil

    and gas potential

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    19/76

    Assisting operators to bring new life to mature fields

    and make unconventional fields commercially viable

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Routinely applied to over

    half of U.S. gas wells and

    a third of oil wells,

    hydraulic fracturing hasbeen proven to enhance

    well performance, mini-

    mize drilling, and recover

    otherwise inaccessible

    resources. It makes the

    development of some low-

    permeability, tight forma-

    tions and unconventional

    resources economically

    feasible. When the flow of

    hydrocarbons is restrictedby formation characteris-

    tics, injecting pressurized

    fluids and solid additives

    can stimulate wells to

    increase production. Fluids

    are pumped into the for-

    mation at pressure great

    enough to fracture the

    surrounding rock. A prop-

    pant slurry follows, biode-

    grading to sand proppant

    that holds the fractures

    open, allowing free pas-

    sage of fluids to the well-

    head. So successful has

    this technology been that

    the industry currently

    spends a billion dollars

    annually on hydraulic

    fracturing.

    Stimulating wells

    to deliver more

    F I RS T I NT RO DU C ED I N, hydraulic fracturingquickly became the mostcommonly used technique tostimulate oil and gas wells,ultimately enabling produc-tion of an additional eightbillion barrels of NorthAmerican oil reserves thatwould otherwise have beenunrecovered. By, fracturing

    had already been appliednearly a million times. Eachyear, approximately,gas and oil wells are hydrauli-cally fractured.

    Fracturing is generally used toregain productivity after thefirst flow of resources dimin-ishes. It is also applied to ini-tiate the production processin unconventional forma-

    tions, such as coalbedmethane, tight gas sands, andshale deposits. Improvementsin fracturing design and qual-ity control have enabled oper-ators to successfully applyfracturing techniques in morecomplex reservoirs, hostileenvironments, and otherunique production settings.

    New advances

    The DOE-led Natural

    Gas and Oil TechnologyPartnership has promotedmany of this decades fractur-ing advances. These includethe use of air, underbalanceddrilling, and new fracturingfluids to reduce formationdamage and speed well clean-up. Improved log interpreta-tion has improved identifica-tion of productive pay zones.Improved borehole tools help

    map microseismic events andpredict the direction andshape of fractures. New-Dfracture simulators withrevised designs and real-timefeedback capabilities improveprediction of results.

    Advanced breakers andenzymes that minimize therisk of formation pluggingfrom large-volume hydraulicstimulations are the latest

    advances to protect the envi-ronment and increase ultimaterecovery. In addition, emerg-ing technologies developed byDOE and the Gas ResearchInstitute, such as microseismicfracture mapping and down-hole tiltmeter fracture map-ping, offer the promise ofmore effective fracture diag-nostics and greater ultimateresource recovery.

    Hydraulic FracturingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Optimized recovery of valuable oil and

    gas resources

    Protection of groundwater resources

    Fewer wells drilled, resulting in less waste

    requiring disposal

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Increased well productivity and ultimate recovery

    Significant additions to recoverable reserves

    Greatly facilitated production from marginal

    and mature fields

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    20/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    The CER Corporation. Using theRifle, CO, Test Site to Improve

    Fracturing Technology,

    apollo.osti.gov/html/fe/cer.html

    Diffusion of Advanced

    Stimulation Technology in the

    Petroleum Industry: A Case

    History. Journal of Petroleum

    Technology, 3/98.

    Dual-Hydraulic-Fracturing

    Technique Minimizes Proppant

    Convection and Increases

    Hydrocarbon Production. Journal

    of Petroleum Technology, 3/97.

    Ellis, R. An Overview of FracPacks: A Technical Revolution

    (Evolution) Process. Journal of

    Petroleum Technology, 1/98.

    Jennings, A., Jr. Fracturing

    FluidsThen and Now. Journal

    of Petroleum Technology, 7/96.

    Longitudinally Fractured

    Horizontal Wells Add Value in

    Alaska. Journal of Petroleum

    Technology, 3/97.

    Stewart, Stewart, and Gaona.Fracturing Alliance Improves

    Profitability of Lost Hills Field.

    Oil & Gas Journal, 11/21/94.

    Swift, T., and P. Mladenka.

    Technology Tackles Low-

    Permeability Sand in South

    Texas. Oil & Gas Journal,

    9/29/97.

    Wolhart, S. New Initiatives in

    Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostics.

    GasTIPS, Fall 1998.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Increased profits from the once

    declining Lost Hills field

    Refined fracturing methods and improved quality control havebrought increased productivity and profitability to a field that onceresisted development. The Lost Hills field in California contains anestimated two billion barrels of oil-in-place, but since its discoveryin it has produced only a fraction of its potential. The fieldhas very low permeability and it lacks a strong natural fracture net-

    work, which restricts the flow of resources. This makes the field dif-

    ficult to produce at acceptable rates without fracture stimulation.

    Although hydraulic fracturing began in Lost Hills during the and , completion results were poor because of small prop-pant volumes and inefficient fracture fluids. Between and, Chevron initiated massive hydraulic fracture stimulation.

    Although productivity increased significantly, costs were high andthe work was not as profitable as anticipated.

    In , Chevron and Schlumberger Dowell formed a partner-ship aimed at improving fracturing efficiency, reducing costs,and increasing productivity. One result is that multiple wells arenow stimulated from fixed equipment locations. Since itsimplementation in late , this central site strategy has beenused to fracture more than wells, using some millionpounds of proppant. The strategy has lowered costs by reducing

    personnel, well completion time, and equipment mobilization,while improving environmental management and safetycontrols. Along with fracture design changes, this has reducedoverall fracturing costs by percent since . These effortsplayed a large part in the fields percent production increasebetween and from , barrels to more than, barrels of oil per day.

    SPE, 1993

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    s Major areas of oil

    and gas potential

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    21/76

    High-tech tools that deliver real-time bottomhole data

    prevent excessive formation damage and make drillingsignificantly more precise and cost-effective

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Measurement-while-drilling

    (MWD) systems measure

    downhole and formation

    parameters to allow more

    efficient, safer, and more

    accurate drilling. These

    measurements can other-

    wise be obtained only by

    extrapolation from surface

    measurements. MWD sys-

    tems calculate and transmit

    real-time data from the drill

    bit to the surface, avoiding

    the time-lag between

    occurrence and surface

    assessment and significantly

    improving drilling safety

    and efficiency. Without this

    analysis of bottomhole con-

    ditions, it is sometimes

    necessary to abandon a

    hole for a new start. MWD

    reduces both costs and

    environmental impacts

    because measurements and

    formation evaluation occurbefore formation damage,

    alteration, or fluid displace-

    ment have occurred. Of par-

    ticular use in navigating

    hostile drilling environ-

    ments, MWD is most fre-

    quently used in expensive

    exploratory wells, and in

    offshore, horizontal, and

    highly deviated wells.

    More information for

    better drilling

    MW D T E CH N OLO GYis critical as operatorsseek to reach deeper and far-ther for new hydrocarbonresources. A real-time bit nav-igation and formation evalua-tion aid, MWD uses toolssuch as triaxial magnetome-ters, accelerometers, and pres-

    sure sensors to provide vitaldownhole data concerningdirectional measurements,pore pressures, porosity, andvibration. This provides formore effective geosteeringand trajectory control, andsafer rig operations. Novelequipment transmits bottom-hole information to the sur-face by encoding data as aseries of pressure pulses in thewellbores mud column or by

    electromagnetic telemetry.Surface sensors and computersystems then decode thetransmitted information andpresent it as real-time data.

    In normal drilling environ-ments, MWD is used to keepthe drill bit on course. MWDis also valuable in more chal-lenging drilling environments,

    including underbalanced,extended-reach, deviated, andhigh-pressure, high-tempera-ture drilling. In underbal-anced directional drilling,MWD monitors the use ofgas injected to maintain safeoperating pressure. In deviat-ed and horizontal wells,MWD can be used to geolog-ically steer the well for maxi-mum exposure in the reser-voirs most productive zones.

    Evaluating the formation

    Prior to the spread of MWDsystems in the late , bot-tomhole conditions weremonitored by time-consum-ing analysis of cuttings andgas intrusion, and by after-the-fact wireline steering mea-surement that necessitated fre-quent interruptions for piperemoval. Today, the continu-

    ous flow of MWD informa-tion improves formationevaluation efforts as well asdrilling progress. Over succes-sive periods, MWD data canreveal dynamic invasioneffects, yielding informationon hydrocarbon mobility, gas-oil-water contact points, andformation porosity. Futureadvances in MWD technology,such as MWD acousticaliperswith digital signal processing

    Measurement-While-DrillingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Less formation damage

    Reduced possibility of well blowouts and

    improved overall rig safety

    Reduced volume of drilling waste as fewer

    wells drilled overall

    Better wellbore control

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Improved drilling efficiency and accuracy

    Timely formation evaluation

    Reduced operating costs and financial risks

    Improved rig safety

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    22/76

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    23/76

    Evolving bit technology allows operators to drill wellboresmore quickly and with less environmental impact

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Dramatic advances in drill

    bit technology have

    improved drilling perfor-

    mance significantly whilecutting wastes and envi-

    ronmental impacts.

    Although the choice of bit

    represents only 3 percent

    of the cost of well con-

    struction, bit performance

    indirectly affects up to 75

    percent of total well cost.

    Faster rates of penetration

    and greatly extended bit

    life, the result of advancesin materials technology,

    hydraulic efficiency, cutter

    design, and bit stability,

    now allow wells to be

    drilled more quickly, more

    profitably, and with less

    environmental impact. The

    improvement to an opera-

    tors cost-efficiency from

    these advances is striking.

    Today, selection of the

    appropriate bit has

    become critical both in

    establishing the overall

    economics of field devel-

    opment and in minimizing

    the environmental impacts

    of drilling.

    The diamond success story

    F ROM US E IN ON Epercent of total world-wide drilling in , to anestimated percent in ,diamond drill bits, which usecutters consisting of a thicklayer of tungsten carbide per-meated with bonded dia-mond particles, have beenone of the success stories ofthe last years. Natural dia-monds, synthetic diamonds,

    and diamond composites arenow routinely used within

    insert-bit cutting structures,and, although originallydeveloped for hard forma-tions, polycrystalline dia-mond compact (PDC) bitshave proved their value insoft- and medium-hard for-mations too. Today, PDC bitsare most applicable in areaswith relatively soft formationsor where drilling is expensive,such as offshore locations andremote wells. In parallel with

    PDC development, rollercone bits have also been

    improved. TheNational PetroleumCouncil estimatesthat improvementsin drilling efficiencyfrom advances suchas those in bit tech-nology have reducedunderlying drillingcosts by about3 percent annually

    over the last years. Asmaterials technology,hydraulics, and bit stabilitycontinue to improve, so willdrilling performance and envi-ronmental protection.

    Matching the bit to the

    formation

    By helping operators choosethe best bit for the job,computerized drill bit opti-mization systems have

    improved the way bits arebeing selected and used.These systems match an indi-vidual formation to the mosteffective milled-tooth, tung-sten carbide insert and PDCbit to complete the job for theleast cost per foot. They alsoprescribe other design para-meters such as hole gauge andhydraulic requirements tohelp determine optimalcutting structure.

    Modern Drilling BitsLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Reduced power use and resultant emissions

    Less drilling waste

    Reduced equipment mobilization and fewer rigs

    Less noise pollution

    Better wellbore control and less formation

    damage

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Increased rates of penetration

    Fewer drilling trips due to greater bit life

    Reduced power consumption

    Improved drilling efficiency and hence viability

    of marginal resources

    Carbide substrate

    Carbide

    substrate

    PDC layer

    PDC layer

    Carbide cylinder

    Carbide stub

    PDC wafer

    Braze joint

    PDC Cutter Components

    Source: Petroleum Engineer International, 1993

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    24/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    Bit Design Key to ImprovedPerformance. Journal of

    Petroleum Technology, 12/96.

    Diamond Enhanced Inserts

    Improve Roller-Cone Bits.

    Journal of Petroleum

    Technology, 2/97.

    Drill-Bit Solutions for

    Operational Constraints. Journal

    of Petroleum Technology, 12/97.

    Lee, M. New Bits Drill Faster,

    Cheaper, Better. The American

    Oil & Gas Reporter, 4/98.

    Locke, S. Advances Reduce TotalDrilling Costs. The American Oil

    & Gas Reporter, 7/98.

    Mensa-Wilmot, G. New PDC

    Cutters Improve Drilling

    Efficiency. Oil & Gas Journal,

    10/27/97.

    New Polycrystalline-Diamond-

    Compact-Bit Technology Proves

    Cost-Effective. Journal of

    Petroleum Technology, 12/97.

    Rappold, K. Industry Pushes Useof PDC Bits to Speed Drilling,

    Cut Costs. Oil & Gas Journal,

    8/14/95.

    The Role of Bit Performance in

    Drilling Efficiency. Supplement

    to Petroleum Engineer

    International.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Switching to new drill bits saves time and moneyUsing a specialized bit optimization system, Anadarko Petroleumhas demonstrated significant efficiency improvements. For exam-

    ple, drilling time was reduced by to days in Algeria, with sav-ings of, to ,; and a Mississippi project saved days and ,. Ultimately, impacts on the environment wereappreciably lessened.

    Petroleum Development Oman found that rates of penetrationdropped from feet per hour to under feet per hour when drillsusing tungsten carbide inserts hit the hard Khuff Formation.Switching to a new generation PDC bit with carbide-supported edgecutters resulted in a new rate of. feet per hour in the Khuff. Theentire section was drilled in one run, at half the cost of the same sec-tion in a similar well. Another well drilled in the comparableZauliayah field resulted in a rate of feet per hour at a cost ofper foot, nearly half the cost of drilling a comparable well in the area

    with an earlier-generation bit.

    When Chevron switched to new generation polycrystalline bits at itsArrowhead Greyburg field in New Mexico, the rate of penetrationincreased more than percent. Chevron had been experiencingproblems using-cone bits and thermally stabilized diamond bits.Switching to PDC bits with curved cutters significantly increaseddrilling efficiency, while reducing environmental impacts.

    Increases in diamond bit drillingIn 1978, approximately 1 percent of the total footage drilled worldwide was drilled

    with diamond bits; in 1985, it was approximately 10 percent; by 1997, that figure

    was an estimated 25 percent. Also, between 1988 and 1994, advances in PDC

    technology increased the average footage drilled by over 260 percent, from

    approximately 1,600 feet to 4,200 feet per PDC bit.

    100%0%

    1978

    1985

    1997

    1%

    10%

    25%

    M E T R I C S

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    Source: Rappold, Oil & Gas Journal, 8/14/95

    Indian Ocean

    Arabian Sea

    Somalia

    Gulf of Aden

    Yemen

    Iran Pakistan

    India

    U.A.E.

    Persian

    Gulf Gulf of

    Oman

    Oman

    Saudi

    Arabia

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    25/76

    New lateral drilling developments provide dramatic returns

    for operators, with less waste, smaller footprints, and

    increased site protection

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Multilateral drilling

    creates an interconnected

    network of separate, pres-

    sure-isolated, and reentry-accessible horizontal or

    high-angle wellbores sur-

    rounding a single major

    wellbore, enabling

    drainage of multiple target

    zones. In many cases, this

    approach can be more

    effective than simple hori-

    zontal drilling in increas-

    ing productivity and

    enlarging recoverablereserves. Often multi-

    lateral drilling can restore

    economic life to an aging

    field. It also reduces

    drilling and waste disposal

    costs. Today, in a wide

    variety of drilling environ-

    ments, both onshore and

    offshore, from the Middle

    East to the North Sea

    and from the North Slope

    to the Austin Chalk, multi-

    lateral completions are

    providing dramatic returns

    for operators.

    Multilateral DrillingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Fewer drilling sites and footprints

    Less drilling fluids and cuttings

    Protection of sensitive habitats and wildlife

    E N VI R O N M E N T A L B E N E F IT SE C ON O M I C B E NE F I T S

    Improved production per platform

    Increased productivity per well and greater ulti-

    mate recovery efficiency

    New life for marginally economic fields in

    danger of abandonment

    Reduced drilling and waste disposal costs

    Reduced field development costs

    Improved reservoir drainage and management

    More efficient use of platform, facility, and crew

    From horizontal to

    multilateral branching

    wellbores

    HO R IZ O NTA L D R IL L-ing provoked a surgeof interest in the as away to contact more oilreserves, penetrating a greatercross-section of the oil-bear-ing rock with a single well-bore and intersecting repeat-edly the fractures that carry

    oil to a producing well.Today, declining production,flat prices, and heightenedenvironmental awarenesshave led the exploration andproduction industry to devel-op advanced drilling andcompletion technologies that

    permit wells to branch outmultilaterally, in certain casessaving both time and moneycompared to horizontaldrilling. In many cases, suchas deep reservoir production,it is more efficient to create aconnected network than todrill multiple individual hori-zontal wellbores.

    Multilateral drilling is ofgreatest value in reservoirsthat:

    Have small or isolatedaccumulations inmultiple zones

    Accumulate oil above thehighest existing perforations

    Have pay zones that arearranged in lens-shapedpockets

    Are strongly directional

    Contain distinct sets ofnatural fractures

    Are vertically segregated,with low transmissibility

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    26/76

    [With advanced re-entry

    multilateral technology] we

    are seeing the potential to

    reduce by half the costs

    associated with subsea

    developments. In some

    cases, this will make what

    were previously marginal or

    non-economic discoveries

    economical.

    ALI DAN ES HY

    Vice President, Halliburton

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    Boone, L., F. Clausen, T.Birmingham, and N. Schappert.

    Horizontal Branches Reach Out

    to Drain Reserves: Slim Hole

    Laterals Put New Twist on Field

    Development. The American Oil

    & Gas Reporter, 7/98.

    DeLuca, M. Multilateral

    Completions on the Verge of

    Mainstream. Offshore Magazine,

    1/97.

    Halliburton Energy Services.

    First Subsea Multilateral with

    Re-Entry Access. Press Release,

    7/21/97.

    Halliburton Energy Services.Multilateral Technology (MLT)

    Overview.

    Taylor, R.W., and R. Russell.

    Multilateral Technologies

    Increase Operational Efficiencies

    in Middle East. Oil & Gas

    Journal, 3/16/98.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Norsk demonstrates the future

    of offshore drilling

    A highly successful offshore project in Norway is showcasing thereduced environmental impacts and increased economic benefits ofmultilateral completions. In March , Norsk Hydro a.s. and

    Halliburton Energy Services drilled the worlds first subsea multilat-eral with reentry access in Norsks Troll field. The companies esti-mate that the economic benefits will be percent greater thanthose from fixed platforms. By reducing the systems required toaccess the subsea reservoir, the project cuts both costs and impacton the environment and leads the way for subsequent offshoredrilling operations.

    New life for old wells:

    pentalateral drilling in the Middle East

    Mounting evidence demonstrates that multilaterial drilling canbring new life to old wells. In the Arabian Gulf recently, a signifi-cant reduction in production that may have spelled well closure in

    the past was instead the stimulus to drill five lateral branches intonew pay zones. The lateral wells were drilled in only days,reaching some , feet of new producing formations. Since thenew zones consisted of relatively soft limestone layers separatedfrom each other by dolomites, drilling presented few problems.Dramatically increased production rates covered costs in just sixdays. In all, production increased . times as a result of the mul-tilateral completions.

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    North

    Sea

    United

    KingdomNetherlands

    Germany

    Norway

    Denmark

    Indian Ocean

    Arabian Sea

    Somalia

    Gulf of Aden

    Yemen

    Iran Pakistan

    India

    U.A.E.

    Persian

    Gulf Gulf of

    Oman

    Oman

    Saudi

    Arabia

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    27/76

    Technology advances in dynamic positioning expand

    opportunities for deepwater drilling with reduced

    environmental impact

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Recent exploration success-

    es in deepwater plays in the

    Gulf of Mexico are of crucial

    importance in providing avital new domestic

    resource. Technological

    advances are increasing

    operators ability to take

    advantage of these finds,

    while reducing the dangers

    and uncertainty inherent in

    deepwater operations.

    Without such progress,

    much of the Gulfs

    resources may remainundeveloped. A major con-

    cern for operators is the

    safety of deepwater

    exploratory operations,

    especially as the industry

    moves toward depths of

    10,000 feet. To ensure

    stability and efficiency at

    such depths, advanced

    dynamic positioning

    technology is now being

    used. This includes thruster

    units and sophisticated

    computer and navigation

    systems to hold a new

    generation of drillships,

    floating production, stor-

    age, and offloading sys-

    tems, and survey vessels on

    location without anchors or

    mooring lines.

    Deepwater opportunities

    TH E GULF OF MEXIC OSdeepwater reservoirshave become Americas newfrontier for oil and gas explo-ration. Production potentialfrom proved and unprovedreserves in deepwater areas isestimated to be roughly.billion barrels of oil and .trillion cubic feet of naturalgas. Consequently, drilling in

    the Gulfs Outer ContinentalShelf has increased greatlyover the last 10 years. Today,deepwater drilling from per-manent structures and wild-cat wells is at an all-timehigh. In October , arecord temporary andpermanent deepwater rigswere drilling in water depthsgreater than , feet, ascompared to only nine in.

    Production from deepwaterwells is increasing too. In, for example, less than percent of the Gulfs total oilproduction was from deepwaterwells. By, over percentof the Gulfs oil productioncame from deepwater wells.Natural gas production fromdeepwater areas in the Gulfhas also increasedfrom lessthan percent of total pro-

    duction in to nearlypercent in .

    Improving station keeping

    Dynamic positioning systemscompensate for the effects ofwind, waves, and current,enabling mobile offshoredrilling units to hold positionover the borehole, maintain-ing within operational limitslateral loads on the drill stemand marine riser. Improved

    dynamic positioning systems,in combination withimproved onboard motioncompensation systems, areexpanding the range of waterdepths and environmentalconditions within whichdrilling operations can besafely conducted.

    Azimuthing thruster units,often retractable so as to enable

    shallow water maneuvers, arethe backbone of the dynamicpositioning system. Ship-basedcomputers and satellite-linkednavigation units control thevessels rudder, propellers, andthrusters using input fromvarious monitoring systems,such as gyrocompass windsensors, real-time differentialglobal positioning systems,micro-wave positioningsystems, underwater sonar

    Offshore Drilling

    Locations: DeepwaterGulf of Mexico, West Africa, North Sea, Brazil, others

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Less disruption to seafloor ecosystem

    Reduced environmental impacts due to

    increased operational stability

    Enhanced deepwater operational safety

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Minimized positioning and transit times for

    deepwater exploration

    Reduced operating costs in deepwater explo-

    ration operations

    Improved access to deepwater and ultra-deep-

    water resources that might otherwise have

    remained undeveloped

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    28/76

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    29/76

    Unlike conventional mud-based drilling, air drilling

    significantly reduces or eliminates drilling fluid additives

    and prevents formation damage

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Pneumatic drilling is an

    underbalanced drilling

    technique in which bore-

    holes are drilled using airor other gases as the cir-

    culating agent. In certain

    cases this air drilling tech-

    nique offers the promise

    of mudless drilling. By

    using nitrogen, air, or

    natural gas in place of

    oil- or water-based muds,

    producers can both elimi-

    nate drilling fluids that

    need disposal and ensurethat drill cuttings are not

    tainted by chemicals or

    oil. Although it is suitable

    only for certain formation

    types and lithologies and

    can create potentially

    explosive downhole condi-

    tionsand is not therefore

    likely to become wide-

    spreadthis technique is

    a very attractive environ-

    mental prospect, offering

    significant operational

    benefits.

    Protecting low-pressure

    formations and maximizing

    production

    U N D E R B A L A N CE Ddrilling offers signifi-cant advantages over conven-tional systems in low-pres-sure or pressure-depleted for-mations. Pressure overbal-ances in conventionaldrilling can cause significantfluid filtrate invasion, and

    lost circulation in the forma-tion. Expensive completions,decreased productivity, andhigh mud and mud-removalcosts can then plague drillingoperations, but these can beavoided by using underbal-anced conditions. By lower-ing downhole pressure using

    a noncondensable gas in thecirculating fluid system,underbalanced pneumaticdrilling can prevent difficul-ties commonly encounteredwhen reservoir pressures arelower than the hydrostaticpressure exerted by tradition-al water-based drilling fluids.Depending on the environ-ment, gas may be used aloneor with water and additives.

    When drilling fluid is need-ed for well control, gas ismixed with lightweightdrilling fluids.

    In general, pneumaticdrilling is used in maturefields and formations withlow downhole pressures, in

    open-hole completions, andin fluid-sensitive formations.It is an important tool indrilling horizontal wells,which must expose a largeamount of reservoir face tobe productive, and haveminimum damage from flu-ids invasion. As horizontaldrilling increases in popular-ity, underbalanced pneumat-ic drilling will become more

    widespread, because it canpenetrate the reservoir with-out damaging the formationor its productive capacity.

    Air drilling techniques to suit

    Air dust drillingis a drytechnique that relies on theannular velocity of air to

    Pneumatic DrillingLocations: Worldwide, onshore and offshore

    B L U E P R I N T O N T E C H N O L O G Y

    T E C H N O L O G Y

    S U M M A R Y

    Greatly reduced drilling fluids and chemical-tainted cuttings

    Decreased power consumption and emissions

    Better wellbore control and less damage to

    formations

    Fewer workover and stimulation operations

    needed

    Potential for smaller drilling footprints and less

    impact on habitats, wildlife, and cultural

    resources

    E N V I R O N M E N T A L B E N E F I T SE C O N O M I C B E N E F I T S

    Substantially less fluid and waste requiringdisposal

    Increased rates of penetration and longer

    drill bit life

    Indication and evaluation of productive zones

    and more effective geosteering of the well by

    monitoring flow of produced fluids

    Potential elimination of waste pits gives access

    to restricted areas

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    30/76

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    C O N T A C T

    Baker, L. Underbalanced Drillingwith Air Offers Many Pluses. Oil

    & Gas Journal, 6/26/95.

    Bennion, D. Underbalanced

    Operations Offer Pluses and

    Minuses. Oil & Gas Journal,

    1/1/96.

    Carden, R. Air Drilling Has Some

    Pluses for Horizontal Wells. Oil

    & Gas Journal, 4/8/91.

    A Closed Circulating System for

    Air Drilling. Journal of

    Petroleum Technology, 2/98.

    Downey, R. On-Site GeneratedNitrogen Cuts Costs of

    Underbalanced Drilling. Oil &

    Gas Journal, 2/24/97.

    Elrod, J. Horizontal Air Drilling

    Increases Gas Recovery in

    Depleted Zone. Oil & Gas

    Journal, 6/30/97.

    LeBlanc, L. Underbalanced

    Drilling Solution for Wells with

    Long Exposure. Offshore

    Magazine, 8/1/95.

    Rusnak, J. Apparatus EliminatesEarthen Pits in Air-Drilling

    Operations. Oil & Gas Journal,

    8/17/98.

    Teichrob, R. Low-Pressure

    Reservoir Drilled with Air/N2 in

    a Closed System. Oil & Gas

    Journal, 3/21/94.

    S O U R C E S A N D A D D I T I O N A L R E A D I N G

    Success in the Field

    C A S E S T U D I E S

    Accessing new supplies in the Carthage field

    Selected as the most viable technique to prevent damage to anextremely low-pressure reservoir, pneumatic drilling made historyas the first air-drilled horizontal well in the Carthage field inTexas. Air drilling successfully increased gas recovery fromdepleted zones without wellbore skin damage, which would haverestricted the reservoirs productive flow. Drilled in December, the Pirkle well had by the end of April produced

    million cubic feet of gas at a rate of. million cubic feet perday. The well was drilled with compressed nitrogen into theCretaceous Frost A zone at , feet true vertical depth; itproduces through a,-foot lateral well with bottomholepressure of psi. The operation successfully met the economiccriteria of producer OXY USA Inc., which had determined thatthe wells production rate would have to at least double that of astandard vertical well to be economically viable.

    transport cuttings. It is

    typically employed indrilling dry formations, orwhen any water influx islow enough to be adsorbedby the air stream. If exces-sive water influx precludesits use, air-mist drillingisemployed instead, using anair-injected mud thatreturns to the surface asmist. Sometimesfoam-drillingis required, using astable mixture of water andcompressed air with deter-gent and chemicals. Whenthe water influx is too greatto be removed throughmist or foam, aerated muddrilling, a technique inwhich air is injected intoviscosified fluid or mud inorder to reduce the weightof the fluid column on theformation, combines thebest properties of conven-

    tional and air drilling toprovide an effective solution.

    A new waste management

    technology enables opera-tors to eliminate the earth-en waste pits used to catcheffluent created whiledrilling with an air- or air-mist system. Liquids andsolids in the effluent areseparated and treated, andgases are exhausted. Byeliminating the environ-mental risks associated withpits, drillers can operate inotherwise restricted areas,such as State parks andwithin city limits. Initialfield tests indicate that thistechnology can handle con-tinuous liquid volumes of barrels per hour andsolid volumes of barrelsper hour.

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Fossil Energy

    1000 Independence Avenue, SW

    Washington, DC 20585

    Elena S. Melchert

    (202) 586-5095

    [email protected]

    Trudy A. Transtrum

    (202) 586-7253

    [email protected]

    s Major areas of oil

    and gas potential

  • 7/28/2019 Adv in Oil & Gas (1)

    31/76

    S U M M A R Y

    Technology advances in less invasive slimhole drillingincreasingly valuable in exploration and production

    D R I L L I N G A N D C O M P L E T I O N

    Improved slimhole drilling

    technology brings the twin

    advantages of environ-

    mental protection and eco-nomical results to oil and

    gas exploration and pro-

    duction. (For example, a

    conventional well drilled

    with a 12.25-inch bit and a

    5-inch drill pipe becomes a

    slimhole when using a

    4-inch bit and a 3.7-inch

    drill pipe.) Slimhole rigs

    are defined as wells in

    which at least 90 percentof the hole has been

    drilled with a bit six inches

    or less in diameter.

    Slimhole rigs not only

    boast a far smaller foot-

    print and less waste gen-

    eration than conventional

    operations, they can also

    reduce operating costs by

    up to 50 percent. The tech-

    nique is proving a low-

    cost, efficient tool with

    which to explore new

    regions, tap undepleted

    zones in maturing fields,

    and test deeper zones in

    existing fields.

    Narrow boreholes prove

    highly effective

    P OTENTIALLY APPLICABLEto more than percentof all wells drilled, slimholedrilling holds promise forimproving the efficiency andcosts of both exploration andproduction. Although thetechnique was first used inthe oil and gas industry in the, its acceptance has beenhampered until recently by

    concerns that smaller bore-holes would limit stimulationopportunities, productionrates, and multiple completions.Advances in technology,coupled with a growingrecord of success, have

    dispelled these concerns,making slimhole an increas-ingly attractive option forreservoir development. Today,slimhole drilling is emplo