Adsorption of Reactive Dyes by Palm Kernel Shell...
Transcript of Adsorption of Reactive Dyes by Palm Kernel Shell...
ISSN: 0973-4945; CODEN ECJHAO
E-Journal of Chemistry
http://www.e-journals.net 2009, 6(4), 949-954
Adsorption of Reactive Dyes by Palm Kernel
Shell Activated Carbon: Application of Film
Surface and Film Pore Diffusion Models
M. M. NOUROUZI, T.G. CHUAH* and THOMAS S.Y.CHOONG
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra,
Malaysia, 43300 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Received 1 October 2008; Revised 17 February 2009; Accepted 15 March 2009
Abstract: The rate of adsorption of two reactive dyes, Reactive Black 5 and
Reactive Red E onto palm kernel shell-based activated carbon was studied. The
experiment was carried out to investigate three models: film diffusion model, film-
surface and film-pore diffusion models. The results showed that the external
coefficients of mass transfer decreased with increasing of initial adsorbate
concentration. In addition, it was found that the adsorption process was better
described by using the two resistance models, i.e. film-surface diffusion.
Keywords: Adsorption, Reactive dye, Palm kernel shell, Film-surface-pore diffusion.
Introduction
Industries, such as textile, ceramic, paper, printing and plastic, use dye as their raw material,
thus generating a large amount of colored wastewater. Adsorption methods are promising in
decolorizing textile effluents, but this application is limited by the high cost of adsorbents.
The activated carbon derived from agricultural wastes is important due to the fact that it is
inexpensive, adequate to remove organic and inorganic contaminants from wastewater and
locally available1. Malaysia is a major producer of palm oil. In 2002 alone, the amount of
palm kernel shell generated in Malaysia was approximately 4.3 million tons which can cause
serious disposal problem2. Considering the volume of this waste, several studies were
initiated to utilize Palm Kernel Shell as the crude material for activated carbon and it is
reported that a good quality product can be obtained, such as its granular structure,
insolubility in water, chemical stability and high mechanical strength2,3
.
It is important to be able to predict the rate at which pollutant is removed from aqueous
solutions in order to design appropriate sorption treatment plants. Therefore, the kinetics that
describes the dye uptake rate needs to be determined. The adsorption mechanism can be
described by three essential steps4:
950 T.G. CHUAH et al.
1. External mass transfer from bulk solution to adsorbent surface across the boundary
layer surrounding the adsorbent surface particle.
2. Intraparticle diffusion within the internal structure of particle. Internal diffusion is
diffusion of molecule inside the pores and surface diffusion is diffusion of the
molecules on surface phase.
3. Adsorption at an interior site.
Generally, the total rate of the kinetic process is controlled by the rate of the slowest
process. The transport of the adsorbate from the bulk of fluid phase to the external surface of
adsorbent forms an important step in the uptake process.
Single resistance models involve only a liquid film resistance, pore diffusion resistance
or surface diffusion resistance5. In most cases, single resistance models are not adequate to
explain the adsorption process for porous adsorbents. Therefore, two resistance mass
transfer models which incorporate both external and intraparticle diffusion effects is
applied6. Two resistance models can be divided into:
1. Film-pore diffusion model.
2. Film-surface diffusion model.
A model which incorporated film, pore diffusion and concentration dependent surface
diffusion was introduced7 and later on a three-resistance model based on external mass
transfer, pore and concentration dependent surface diffusion for removal of methylene blue
by PKS based-AC was presented8. They expressed that the film-pore-concentration-
dependent surface diffusion (FPCDSD) model was able to fit the experimental data using a
single set of mass transfer parameters for a wide range of initial dye concentrations.
However, a two resistance model may be easier for implementation.
Experimental
PKS-based activated carbon supplied from KD Technology Sdn. Bhd was used without any
chemical or physical treatment. Two reactive dyes were used for this investigation, namely,
Reactive Black 5 (RB 5) and Reactive Red E (RR E) supplied from Texchem-Pack Bhd. The
chemical structure of these dyes is given in Table 1. According to data obtained from pH
meter, for single solution pH of the solution of RB 5 and RRE was 6.5 and 6.4, respectively.
For binary solution, treating both dyes RB 5 and RR E in one solution, pH was 6.4. To
prepare the stock solution, 1.000 g (+0.0005) of each dye was dissolved in 1 L distilled
water. In order to maintain homogenous condition, the solution was shaken for 5 hours using
orbital incubator shaker (Sepilau Saintifik, Malaysia) at 28oC. Then the solution was kept in
dark place for avoiding any off-color due to sunlight. The stock solution would then be
diluted into desired concentration.
Batch kinetic study
Batch kinetic studies were performed to investigate the dynamic behavior of PKS - based
activated carbon for removal of reactive dyes. The experiments were accomplished in
shaking conical flasks with 1000 mL dye solution at a constant temperature of 28 °C (+ 2 °C),
using an incubator. The pH of the solutions was without any modification. Sample of 1 mL
was carefully withdrawn at every 3 minutes for the first 30 minutes and at every 5 minutes
for the next 30 minutes of adsorption process. For the next 60 minutes, sampling was done
every 10 minutes and eventually every 60 minutes for the next 20 hours and every 6 hours
until equilibrium point. The same procedure was applied for kinetic study for binary mixture
at concentration of 20 mg/L (for each dye) and activated carbon mass of 2 g/L.
Adsorption of Reactive Dyes by Palm Kernel Shell Activated Carbon 951
Table 1. Properties of RB 5 and RR E9.
C.I. Reactive Black 5 C.I. Reactive Red E
Type Reactive dye Reactive dye
Chemical structure
Molecular length, nm 3.61 2.32
Molecular width, nm 0.25 0.72
Max wave length of
adsorption (λmax,) nm
596
540
Theoretical model
External mass transfer
The mass transfer rate at the external surface layer of the adsorbent particle10
is:
Nt = kf SA (cb-cs) (1)
Where Nt is adsorption rate at time t, kf is the interphase mass transfer coefficient, SA is
surface area, cb and cs are adsorbate concentration in the bulk of fluid and that at the fluid-
particle interface, respectively.
The differential mass balance is given by:
dt
qMd
dt
VdcN b
t =−=
(2)
pp
Aa
MS
ρ
3=
(3)
where q is average adsorbed-phased concentration, M is mass of adsorbent, V is volume of
solution, ap is particle radius and ρp is pellet density. The concentration of adsorbate, q , with
respect to time is related to the mass transfer coefficient kf by:
)(3
sb
pp
fcc
a
k
dt
qd−=
ρ
(4)
Equation 4 can be solved with appropriate initial condition:
0,0 <== tqandcc sbob
(5)
Intraparticle mass transfer
Film-surface diffusion
Fick’s second law of diffusion suggested that the adsorbate molecule is transferred through the
adsorbent particles by creeping from one adsorption site to another on the solid surface. The
surface diffusivity Ds of adsorbed molecules is assumed here to be concentration independent.
The mass transport in the spherical particle is described by following equation.
0,0,11 2
2≥≤≤
∂
∂
∂
∂=
∂
∂tar
r
qr
rrt
q
Dp
S
(6)
Equation 6 was solved with appropriate initial and boundary conditions:
952 T.G. CHUAH et al.
0,0,0 <≤≤= tarq p (7)
0,0 ==∂
∂r
r
q
(8)
The second-boundary condition for external mass transfer is10
:
0),(33
≥−=∂
∂= tcc
a
k
r
q
a
Dparb
pp
f
p
s
ρ
(9)
The external mass transfer coefficient, kf, is estimated from the single-resistance model.
To calculate the value of the solid phase diffusivity, Ds, equation 6 was solved numerically,
considering the value of kf obtained from single-resistance model.
Film-pore diffusion
Pore diffusion equations are described as follow:
p
p
pp arr
cr
rr
D
t
q
t
c≤≤
∂
∂
∂
∂=
∂
∂+
∂
∂0),( 2
2ρε (10)
00,0,0 <≤≤== tarqc p (11)
0,0,0 ≥==∂
∂tr
r
c (12)
0,),()( ≥=∂
∂=− tar
r
cDcck ppbf
(13)
where Dp is pore diffusivity.
Both the two resistance models were solved by using finite-difference method, as
approximating the spatial derivation by central difference expression.
Results and Discussion
To evaluate the external mass diffusion, the values of external mass transfer coefficient kf were
calculated for different initial concentrations. Table 2 presents the values of kf for adsorption of
RR5 and RR E onto PKS based-AC. It can be noted that these values, ranging between 3.7×10-3
to 3.7×10-4
cm/s, decrease with an increase in initial dye concentration. The value of kf in a single
resistance mass transport model is normally expected to be constant, variation of external mass
coefficient shows that intraparticle diffusion is playing a significant role in the mass transport
process6. It is expressed that the values of kf decreased with increasing of initial adsorbate
concentration11
. The same results were shown for adsorption of dye onto bagasse pith12
. It can be
noted from the Table 2 that it agrees with finding of this work. It is possible that increasing the
concentration of dyes, considering the large molecule of dye, causes the reduction of mobility of
transferring adsorbates into the boundary layer4.
Table 2. External mass transfer coefficient kf for adsorption of RB 5 and RR E onto PKS-
based AC (single system).
Isotherm model Interphase Mass Transfer Coefficient, cm/s
100, mg/L 20, mg/L
RB 5 / PKS Pellet 5.5×10-4
3.7×10-3
RR E / PKS Pellet 3.7×10-4
7.4×10-4
By changing the values of kf and Ds it is possible to obtain the best fit to the
experimental curves for batch adsorption. Table 3 presents the values of Ds for adsorption
of RB 5 and RR E with dye concentration 20 mg/L onto PKS-based AC with dosage 2 g/L.
Time, h
Time, h
Cb/C
bo
C
b/C
bo
Adsorption of Reactive Dyes by Palm Kernel Shell Activated Carbon 953
Some values of the surface diffusivity, reported in other literature are listed in Table 3, as well.
It can be seen that the values of Ds ranges between 1.5×10-9
to 1.5×10-10
cm2/s. From Table 3, it
can be noted that the values of Ds for RB 5 and RR E are different from values of other
literatures. The difference shows specificity of adsorption. In other word interaction between
adsorbate and adsorbent is characteristic for each system and it is not common for all systems13
.
Table 3. Values of Ds, reported in the literature on adsorption of different dyes using
different adsorbents and this work.
Material Dye Surface Diffusivity, cm2/s Reference
Filtrasorb-400 AC Cibacron reactive red 1.5×10-10
14
Filtrasorb-400 AC Tectilon Red 2B 1.5×10-9
15
PKS-AC RB 5 1×10-6
This work.
PKS-AC RR E 9×10-7
This work.
Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show the comparisons of results of both adsorptions of RB 5 and
RR E onto PKS-based activated carbon with predictions based on the film-surface diffusion
and film-pore diffusion models. It is obvious from these figures that prediction based on the
film-surface diffusion model fits better with experiment data than the film-pore diffusion
model, and it agrees with both dyes. The values of SSE for film-surface diffusion are
significantly less than values of SSE for film-pore diffusion, as shown in Table 5. As a
result, it indicated that the adsorption process was governed by the resistance models, i.e.
film-surface diffusion mechanism. The values of Dp are as listed in Table 4.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Cb
/Cb
o
20 mg/L S.D
20 mg/L Exp data
20 mg/L P.D
Figure 1(a). Comparison between prediction of film-surface diffusion (S.D) and film-pore
diffusion (P.D) models with experiments data from adsorption of RB 5 onto PKS-based activated
carbon at dye concentration of 20 mg/L and dosage of adsorbent 2 g/L (single system).
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 50 100 150 200 250
Cb
/Cb
o
20 mg/L S.D
20 mg/L Exp data
20 mg/L P.D
Figure 1(b). Comparison between prediction of film-surface diffusion (S.D) and film-pore
diffusion (P.D) models with experiments data from adsorption of RR E onto PKS-based activated
carbon at dye concentration of 20 mg/L and dosage of adsorbent 2 g/L (single system).
954 T.G. CHUAH et al.
Table 4. Values of Dp for adsorption of RB 5 and RR E onto PKS based-AC.
Kinetic Model pD , cm
2/s
RB 5/PKS 2.4×10-7
RR E/PKS 4.7×10-8
Table 5. Comparison of SSE of film-surface diffusion and film-pore diffusion models for
adsorption of RB 5and RR E onto PKS based-AC.
Kinetic model SSE
Film-surface diffusion Film-pore diffusion
RB 5/PKS 13.9 153.6
RR E/PKS 4.5 101.6
Conclusion
The rate of the kinetic process for both dyes was better described by two resistance models.
Based on SSE, the film-surface diffusion model was able to fit experimental better than the
film-pore diffusion model for both RB 5 and RR E on palm kernel based activated carbon.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to KD Technology Sdn. Bhd. for supplying granular PKS.
References
1. Mohan D and Pittman Jr C U Journal of Hazardous Materials., 2007, 142, 1-53.
2. Ma A N, Palm Oil Engineering Bulletin, 2002, 24-26.
3. Chuah T G, Jumasiah A, Gimbon J, Choong T S Y and Azni I, Desalination, 2005,
186, 57-64.
4. McKay G, Bino M J and Altememi A, Water Res., 1986, 20, 435-442.
5. Al-Qoudah Z, Water Res., 2000, 34, 4295-4303.
6. Choy K K H, Ko D C K, Cheung C W C, Porter J F and McKay G, J Colloid
Interface Sci., 2004, 271, 284-295.
7. Choy K K H, Porter J F and McKay G, Adsorption, 2001, 7, 305-317.
8. Choong T S Y, Wong T N, Chuah T G and Idris A, J Colloid Interface Sci., 2006,
301, 436-440.
9. Kim S I, Yamamoto T, Endo A, Ohmori T and Nakaiwa M, Microporous and
Mesoporous Materials, 2006, 96, 191-196.
10. Tien C, Adsorption calculation and modeling; Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994, 99-119.
11. Tsai W T, Chang CY, Ing C H and Chang C F, J Colloid Interface Sci., 2004, 275, 72-78.
12. Mckay G, El Geundi M and Nassar M M, Water Res., 1988, 22, 1527-1533.
13. Meshko V, Markovska L, Mincheva M and Rodrigues A E, Water Res., 2001, 14,
3357-3366.
14. Yang X Y and Al-Duri, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 83, 15-23.
15. Walker G M and Weatherley L R, Water Res., 1999, 33, 1895-1899.
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Inorganic ChemistryInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal ofPhotoenergy
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Carbohydrate Chemistry
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Chemistry
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Advances in
Physical Chemistry
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com
Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Journal of
Volume 2014
Bioinorganic Chemistry and ApplicationsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
SpectroscopyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Medicinal ChemistryInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Chromatography Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Applied ChemistryJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Theoretical ChemistryJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Spectroscopy
Analytical ChemistryInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Quantum Chemistry
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Organic Chemistry International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
CatalystsJournal of
ElectrochemistryInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014