Adrian Abbott & Jody Asquith Benchmarking Energy Consumption in Coal Mining.
-
Upload
kristian-whitehead -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Adrian Abbott & Jody Asquith Benchmarking Energy Consumption in Coal Mining.
Adrian Abbott &Jody Asquith
Benchmarking Energy Consumption in Coal Mining
“I understand the value of developing a baseline to know my site’s performance, but how do I know where I stand relative to industry best practice?”
The Answer…
Energy Benchmarking
Benchmark energy performanceSite(s) performance relative to like operationsTypical ranges of performance
equipment levelprocess level
Benchmarking Energy Performance
Where are we at?….
• Established an energy baseline• Developed sub process detail
• Identified energy performance metrics• Reporting monthly, quarterly and annually….
…but how do I know where I stand relative to industry best practice?
CHECKCHECK
CHECKCHECK
Benchmark Energy Performance!
• Map ALL of the above to like sites within the organisation, and• Map ALL of the above to industry
Energetics’ Benchmarking Tool
• Utilises an energy dataset that has been built up and refined over 25 years of working with the industry
• How is your operation performing relative to other, similar operations and against industry best practice?
• How does the variability (range, frequency) of your own energy performance compare with others?
• Identify areas which should be targeted for improvement, even down to process or equipment type.
Electricity Consumption – O/C
Admin2.01%
Air compressors0.34%
Bath House1.31%
Centrifuge1.06%
Conveyors2.87%
Crushers1.86%
Dragline22.28%
Lighting1.06%
Loadout3.78%
Other38.89%
Pumps10.62%
ROM Handling3.41%
Screens1.07%
Shovels5.37%
Stacker / Reclaimer
2.09%
Vacuum Pump1.70%
Vibrators0.02%
Workshop0.26%
Energy Balance
• “Typical” site
• Focus on areas of highest consumption
• “Other” indicates more metering/ analysis needed
ACME Colliery
• Open cut mine using truck and shovel
• CHPP
• 7.5 million ROM tonnes/4 million tonnes product
Average site performance
Energy intensity performance indicators:
• Understand industry average
• “per Saleable Tonne” allows for CHPP
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
1 20 24 2 25 27 11 33 22 4 23 29
AC
ME 7 8 10 12 30 5 14 26 6 3 18 21 28 9 19 17 32 31
MJ
per
Sal
eab
le T
on
ne
Site Identifier
Benchmarking Energy KPI - all mine types
Similar sites
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
20 22 29 ACME 7 8 12 30 14 18 28 19 17 32 31
Open Cut
MJ
per
sal
eab
le t
on
ne
Site Identifier
Benchmarking Energy KPI against all other Open Cut using Truck and Shovel
Energy cost performance
Understand range in energy cost per month of saleable coal during varying monthly production.
Understand if your range is ‘above’ or ‘below’ average.
Can be used as a high level ‘Trigger’ for further investigation.
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
- 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
$/ T
on
ne
Sa
lea
ble
Co
al
Monthly Production, Thousand Tonne
Energy Cost per Saleable Tonne vs Production - Monthly
All Sites ACME Colliery
Understand industry performance ranges and average
Highlights smallest range ‘Min’ & largest range ‘Max’
Energy intensity performance spread – Quality of control!
Here, ACME performs the best in class with a tight range.
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
All Sites Max Range Min Range ACME
MJ
/ to
nn
e S
ale
ab
le C
oa
l
Energy Performance Range
Max
Min
Average
Performance frequency
Does ACME frequently perform within a certain target range?
Why?
Can frequency be improved to the left of chart?
How does ACME compare amongst industry?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1. - 1.2 - 1.4 - 1.6 - 1.8 - 2. - 2.2 - 2.4 - 2.6 - 2.8 - 3. - 3.2 - 3.4 - 3.6 - 3.8 - 4. - 4.2 - 4.4 - 4.6 - 4.8 - 5. - 5.2 - 5.4 - 5.6 - 5.8 - 6. - 6.2 - 6.4 - 6.6 -
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8
Fre
qu
en
cy
MJ/tonne Saleable Coal
Energy Use per Tonne Saleable Coal - Conveyors
ACME
Drilling down…
Identifies major equipment areas
Seek to understand each unit in terms of its level of activity.
Such as:High use by the pumps - is it because the pumps aren’t performing or does the site use too much water?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
MJ
per
to
nn
e o
f S
alea
ble
Co
al
Electrical Energy Intensity by Equipment Type
ACME Colliery All Sites
Summary
• Operational benefit
• Improve understanding of site performance (productivity, yield, etc)
• Financial benefits in lower cost of production
• As energy costs escalate, impacts will gain importance
• Energy management is another operational management dimension
• Identify largest stream & analyse/report
• Drill down
• Identify next largest stream…
• Should I accept what I see?
Next Steps
•“Harvest” the data from what you are already collecting
•Sub-metering and/or analysis to drill down deeper
Energy-mass balance
EEO
•Benchmark your results and identify areas to focus on for potential improvement