Adoption of a new project based learning (pbl) curriculum in information technology
-
Upload
helsinki-metropolia-university-of-applied-sciencies -
Category
Education
-
view
224 -
download
2
Transcript of Adoption of a new project based learning (pbl) curriculum in information technology
Adoption of a new project-based learning curriculum in information technologyVesikivi P, Hjort P, Lakkala M, Holvikivi J & Lukkarinen S
43rd Annual SEFI ConferenceJune 29 – July 2, 2015Orléans, France
51 % drop off
Retention rate in 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
engineering education 42% 40% 43% 45% 49%
Photo: John Springer Collection/CORBIS
Information technology —The first year curriculum 2013-> 2014
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
12
Course ECTS
Basic Engineering Mathematics 6
Introduction to Calculus 6
Finnish for Foreigners 1 3
Finnish for Foreigners 2 3
Technical Writing and Presentation Skills 3
English Reporting Skills for ICT Projects 3
Introduction to Computing 3
Introduction to Studies 6
Orientation Project 6
Communication Networks 5
Digital Circuits 6
Programming 5
Circuits and Signals 5
Course ECTS
Orientation* 15
Games 15
Robots 15
Networks 15
Contents %
Project and team work
50 %
Mathematics & Physics
20-30 %
Languages & Communication
20-30 %
* Objects for Finnish students
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
13
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
9—12 Math Comm Project Lang Project
12—13 Lunch
13—16 Lang Project Project Math Project
Weekly schedule
Mathematics & Physics
Languages & communicati
on
Team work &Project
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
18
What is the impact of integrated model on the student course completion rate?
How do the students and teachers evaluate the benefits and challenges of the course practices?
Participants, Settings, and Data collection
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
22
Natives (Finns)
Internationals
Cumulative credits & Feedback
85 % of active students completed the targeted 30 ECTS.
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
28
85 %
15 %
38 %
50 %12 %
Student evaluation – Positive feedback
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
34
Working methods (61)Practical tasks (17)Group work (19)
Learning community and atmosphere (14)
Working methods in general (7)
Teaching and guidance (35)Good teachers and teaching (22)Teacher’s positive attitude (5)
Guidance and feedback from teachers (8)
Outcomes (19)Learnt new things (14)
High quality products (5)
Content (18)
Interesting and useful content (18)
Organisation (12)Good entity (7)Appropriate phase of work (3)
Good integration of subjects (2)
Facilities (4)
Project work (2)
Freedom of choice (2)
Student evaluation – Negative feedback
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
35
Working methods (40)Too little teaching of theory (8)
Problems in group work (13)Compulsory attendance (2)
Challenging working methods (6)
Teaching and guidance (19)Poor teachers and teaching (7)
Unclear goals and evaluation criteria (6)Too little guidance and feedback (6)
Content (27)Difficult content (18)
Organisation (43)Uneven workload (9)
Confusing and incomplete arrangements (12)
Poor integration of subjects (8)
Facilities (7)
Restless classroom (4)
Too much teaching of theory (3)
Tight timetable and heavy workload (7)Poor communication practices (7)
Not interesting or useful content (9)
Too much group work (4)
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
41
Summary Outcome
Retention rate
Number of students completed their courses as planned
Working methods
Teaching and guidance
Adaptation for collaboration
Course organisation
Acknowledgments
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
45
The study was partially supported by the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union under Grant KA3MP-2013-4764/001-001 Promoting nowledge Work Practices in Education; the KNORK project; http://knork.info.
Hjort, Holvikivi, Vesikivi & Lukkarinen, (2015), Student Collaboration and Independence from Day One in Higher Education. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, June 29 - July 2, 2015, Orleans, France
47Photo: Sakari Lukkarinen@Crete 2013