Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy
description
Transcript of Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy
![Page 1: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency
and support fiscal policy Abdul Khan
Fiscal Affairs DepartmentPresentation at the Regional Workshop
on Financial Reporting and Management of Fiscal Risks
in Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan, May 21-23, 2014
![Page 2: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Topics of this presentation
• Why use international standards? • What does it mean to introduce international
standards like IPSAS or IFRS? • Examples of countries that have introduced
IPSAS or IFRS. • Lessons from other countries and other
factors to keep in mind during introduction of IPSAS
Japan IMF Sub Acc
![Page 3: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Why use international standards?(1/2) • Support transparency and oversight of
public finances and policy decisions :– Consolidated “whole-of-government” statements
would support policy making through fuller information on assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash controlled by government
– Reporting assets more fully would improve transparency and provide basis for investment policies
– Reports more credible, readily understood, and comparable world-wide
![Page 4: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Why use international standards?(2/2)
• Savings from avoidance of need to issue and maintain own standards
• Benefits from international expertise• Synergies in the preparation, audit, and
analysis of financial reports– accounting professionals from private sector
can be used to help with transition– Mobility between private and public sector
![Page 5: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
• IPSAS provides standards for financial statements, including for specific transactions or assets and liabilities:– Tax revenues, PPPs, government guarantees etc
• Implementation of IPSAS would involve– GAP analysis - “where we are?” Vs “where do we
wish to be?”– Preparing a plan to implement– Management of implementation including change
management
What does it mean to introduce IPSAS?
![Page 6: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
IPSAS implementation: Some issues to be aware of ….• International Vs national
– Some IPSAS activities may be seen to driven by issues that are not a concern in a particular country
– Issues that may be important for a country may not be a global priority
• To address these issues, countries (standard setters, MoF) should actively participate in IPSASB deliberations– attend meetings, review and comment on papers etc.
![Page 7: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Costs of IPSAS implementation – data should be interpreted with caution• Cost information often includes costs of other reforms besides
accrual accounting
• Cost estimates for EU Member States fall within the range of 0.02-0.1 percent of GDP
• Likely to vary according to the state of existing framework
Country Cost RemarksSwitzerland €40m Accrual budgeting and
accounting; 80% of costs re IT system
Austria €30m Accrual budgeting and accounting, MTEF and PB reforms
EU Up to €50m
For a medium-sized EU country
![Page 8: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Examples of countries that have introduced IPSAS or IFRS
• Switzerland and Austria introduced IPSAS with some exceptions
• U.K., Australia, and New Zealand adopted IFRS with some exceptions–New Zealand decided to adopt IPSAS
from 2014
![Page 9: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Switzerland - IPSAS• New Accounting Model introduced 2007• Based on IPSAS• Budgeting and accounting on the same
basis• Main exceptions to IPSAS
– Employee pension liabilities not recognized, but disclosed as contingent liabilities
– Consolidated financial statements of all controlled entities: phased approach adopted
![Page 10: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
SwitzerlandOverview of financial statements
![Page 11: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Austria: IPSAS• IPSAS mentioned in Organic BL (2009)
– Part of comprehensive reform of budget framework
• Budgeting and accounting on same basis• Main exceptions to IPSAS
– Pension liabilities not recognized, but disclosed– Consolidated financial statements for controlled
entities intended to be done in future
![Page 12: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
The United Kingdom: IFRS• Adopted IFRS from 2009-10
– IPSAS also used where appropriate. • Produces whole-of government consolidated
financial statements; consolidates– Bank of England– some 1500 entities, including sub-national
government entities• Main departure from IFRS
– State-owned banks not consolidated– Network Rail not consolidated – in line with statistical,
but not accounting standards
![Page 13: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
The U.K: Reconciliation of WGA and National Accounts - Public Sector Net Debt
![Page 14: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
The U.K.: Reconciliation between the WGA and National Accounts: Current Deficit
![Page 15: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Australia: IFRS (plus govt.-specific enhancements)
• Whole of government accounts– Consolidates all controlled entities including
“independent” entities (e.g., central bank, courts)
– Harmonization of accounting and statistics: reduces confusion
• Enhancements where IFRS does not deal with not-for-profit entity issues– non- exchange income (Tax) recognition
![Page 16: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Australia: GFS sector information in Financial Statements
![Page 17: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Australia: Cash reporting is integral to accrual accounting
![Page 18: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
The U.S. example• Uses highly developed FASAB
standards• Cash budgeting and accrual
financial statements• Innovative and simplified
presentation to improve communication of complex information
![Page 19: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
USA: Nation by the numbersA Snapshot of the Government's Financial Position & Condition
![Page 20: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
U.S.A: Cash Budget and Accrual Accounts
![Page 21: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
U.S.A.: Reconciliation of Cash Budget and Accrual Accounts
![Page 22: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Lessons from international experience: A phased approach to implementation (1/2)• May adopt some IPSAS during first phase, others
during subsequent phases; for example– Financial assets and liabilities may be done in
Phase 1, nonfinancial assets in Phase 2• Financial assets and liabilities can also be recognized
progressively in phases• For example, tax revenue recognition may pose some
challenges – therefore can defer it to Phase 2– Consolidated financial statements may be
implemented in phases• Separate financial statements of central government can
be done in Phase 1, partial consolidation can be done in Phase 2, and full consolidated statements can be done in Phase 3
![Page 23: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Lessons from international experience: A phased approach to implementation (2/2)
• Pilot implementation with some agencies may be considered– Helps identify issues and challenges before
launching intro full implementation• IPSAS based financial statements may
initially be produced on a trial basis– SAI can review but not audit trial statements; – Full audit during a subsequent “official” phase
![Page 24: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Lessons from international experience: Change management is important
• Need a well thought out strategy, including objectives, conceptual framework, implementation phases
• Communication with key stakeholders, including parliament, ministers, and other key executives/officials.
• Training • Systems changes• Detailed plan of implementation
![Page 25: Adopting international reporting standards to enhance transparency and support fiscal policy](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051821/56816083550346895dcfae03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Thank you!