Adhe nov2011
-
Upload
zoraini-wati-abas-edd -
Category
Education
-
view
426 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Adhe nov2011
DEVELOPM
ENT OF
HIGH P
ERFORMIN
G
OPEN A
ND DIS
TANCE
LEARNIN
G ACADEMIC
S
Z O RA I N I WAT I A B A S , E D . D .
M A N S O R FA D Z I L , P H . D .
O P E N U N I V E R S I T Y M A L AY S I A
KU A L A LU M P U R
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 1
QUESTIONS
Can we expect new lecturers to be able to effectively:
Teach
-Design instruction
-Manage the “classroom”
-Develop learning materials
-Support learning
-Develop assessment instruments (test items, exams, assignments, projects, etc.)
Conduct research
Publish
POST GRADUATE CERTIFICATE IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING
(PGCERTODL)
PRESENTAT ION TO GMC1 5 D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 0
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 4
• To equip OUM full-time academicians with the necessary knowledge and skills relevant to their day-to-day responsibilities as SMEs/PCs in support of the learning needs of ODL learners and tutors.
Purpose
PGCERT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
Establishment of PGCert (ODL)
Committee
(Sept 2010)
Conceptualisation of
Program, MJPAU
Approval, GMC
endorsement
(Oct-Dec 2010)
Identification of
Participants
(Dec 2010)
Identification/
Preparation of
materials
(Nov 2010 – Dec 2011)
Implementation
(Feb 2011 – Jan 2012)
Program Evaluatio
n
(Feb 2011– Jan
2012)
GMC 15 December 2010 P G C E RT ( O D L ) C O M M I T T E E5
Advisor(SVP)
Programme Coordinato
r(ZWA)
SME/Facilitator
Team Members
Secretariat (HRM)
04/11/2023P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E
I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 6
PGCert (ODL) Committee
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 7
• Effectively tutor a course in the ODL environment
• Facilitate learning and support learners through effective presence in the online forums as well as demonstrate to other tutors how good online facilitation should be
• Design and develop appropriate learning materials suitable for ODL learners based on sound instructional design principles
• Write and moderate course materials (print and/or web-based)
Upon successful completion of the programme, the participant is expected to be able to:
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 8
• Prepare and evaluate assessment items such as examinations, assignments and projects
• Conduct basic research and report the findings in a conference paper or journal article for publication
• Monitor and evaluate ODL implementations for future improvement
• Describe the latest trends and issues in higher education and how these may benefit ODL institutions and learners
Upon successful completion of the programme, the participant is expected to be able to:
Issues and Trends in Higher Education
Programme Evaluation
Basic Research Knowledge and Academic Writing Skills *
Development of OUM Web-based Module
Development of OUM Printed Module
Instructional Design for Development of Learning Materials
Assessment
Online Facilitation in the ODL Environment
Face-to-Face Instruction in ODL
04/11/2023P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E
I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G
9
Pro
gra
m S
tru
ctu
re9
mod
ule
s -
10
cre
dit
hou
rs (400
learn
ing
hou
rs)
- 10
mon
ths
* 2 c
redit
s
PROGRAM DELIVERY
GMC 15 December 2010 P G C E RT ( O D L ) C O M M I T T E E
10
• Priority to staff:• With NO prior academic experience• With less than five years experience as an OUM academic
(as of 1 July 2010)• Who are identified by the Dean/HOS
Participants
• One module per month/every four weeks• 25 maximum participants per group• Contextual Learning• Blended mode (40 hours learning time per course. 80 hours learning
time for Research and Academic Writing)• F2F (generally 2 hours per week every Thursday, 8.45-
10.45am)• myVLE for forum discussions• Self-managed learning
Delivery
• Successful participants will be awarded a certificate by OUM• Participants may attempt a maximum of two times• Tied to confirmation/promotion/renewal of contract
Award
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 11
PARTIC
IPAN
T
FEE
DB
AC
K
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 12
The facilitators were:
“interesting,” “knowledgeable,” “motivating,” and “had sense of humour”.
Delighted with the way the programme was delivered.
Program was:“fantastic,” “informative,” “great,” “just perfect,” “well-planned,” “lively,” and “effectively delivered.”
PARTIC
IPAN
T
FEE
DB
AC
K
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 13
Complaint:
Not enough time to work on the assignments due to the normal university work load.
FAC
ILITATO
R
FEE
DB
AC
K
Facilitator A
Participants had progressed
from having amateur knowledge on instructional design to different levels of expert knowledge.
As most participants came in with different ID conceptions and knowledge, the course had managed to bring them up to a higher level. This is evident in their assignments. Though they are not all are there as yet, there has been marked improvement.
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 14
FAC
ILITATO
R
FEE
DB
AC
K
Facilitator B
Participants demonstrated good use of presentation slides to enhance their delivery of course content and most participants were found to be able to conduct face-to-face tutorials effectively.
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 15
FAC
ILITATO
R
FEE
DB
AC
K
Facilitator C
Participants were generally attentive and participative.
I sensed that they were following. . . . demonstrated through the assignments that were submitted to me.
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 16
FAC
ILITATO
R
FEE
DB
AC
K Future improvements: Facilitator A: “I would like to have a
more structured pre-test as it is a very powerful tool in enabling participants to engage themselves in innate knowledge and how to rectify it on the spot. I may also need another shorter session to share feedback and highlight learning points."
Facilitator B: Would add an additional hands-on session on how to leverage on Web resources (such as YouTube Video, freeware and shareware, educational websites etc) to optimise face-to-face instruction.
04/11/2
023
P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G 17
THE E
ND AND
THANK YO
U
04/11/2023P O S T G RA D U AT E C E RT I F I C AT E
I N O P E N A N D D I S TA N C E L E A R N I N G
18