Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Governing Board Presentation

October 14, 2008

Theresa Sweeney

2

AYP – Federal Standards

• Evaluation of a school and a district for NCLB– Attendance (90%)– Percent Tested (95%)– Test Objectives (varies by subject and grade

level)

3

Disaggregated Evaluation

• Subgroups included in the evaluation (≥ 40 students)– Ethnicity

• White• African American• Asian• Hispanic • Native American

– English Language Learner (ELL)– Special Education– Low Socioeconomic Status

4

Are students counted in more than one category?

• Yes, a student can be counted in multiple categories.

e.g. A white student who is in special education and low socioeconomic status is counted 3 times provided each category had 40 or more students.

5

Implications for NOT making AYP

• AYP is a part of the AZ Learns Label– 1 point out of 27 possible

• Title Schools (a school that receives any title money at all) are placed into School Improvement

• Each year of school improvement brings sanctions from writing a School Improvement Plan, providing transportation to students to attend another school, firing the principal and staff, and bringing in an outside agency to run the school

6

Schools That Did Not Make AYP

• Pueblo**– Grade 6 Reading Special Education

• Kyrene Middle School (School Improvement Year 2)– Grade 6 Reading Special Education– Grade 7 Reading Special Education– Grade 8 Reading Special Education

**Pueblo is not a Title School

7

Sanctions for Title Schools That Did Not Make AYP

• Warning Year– Parent Notification

– Develop a School Improvement Plan (ASIP)

– District Offers Technical Support

• School Improvement Year 1– All of the Above

– Public School Choice

– Set Aside 10% of the Title Budget for Professional Development

8

Sanctions for Title Schools That Did Not Make AYP

• School Improvement Year 2– All Warning Year and School Improvement Year I

Sanctions

– Supplemental Educational Services• Rank Order the Greatest Need Students

• Provide Funding for these students to contract with a provide vendor for tutoring

9

District AYP Status

• Kyrene is in Year 2 of LEA (Local Education Association) Improvement Status

• Categories that did not make AYP– Grade 3 Reading Special Education– Grade 6 Math Special Education– Grade 8 Reading Special Education

10

Sanctions For A District that Does Not Make AYP

• Year 2– Parent Notification Letter– Title I 10% set-aside for Professional

Development– Conduct a self-assessment– Develop an Improvement Plan– Implement the Improvement Plan– Evaluate self-assessment and Improvement

Plan

11

Questions About AYP

12

AZ Learns State Standards

• State Accountability System– Excelling– Highly Performing– Performing Plus– Performing– Underperforming

• Public Release: October 8, 2007

13

Points Possible

AIMS Percent Pass

Reading, Writing, Math

AIMS Percent reduced in Falls Far Below

18 points

MAP

Students who achieve one years growth 8 points

ELL 1 point

AYP 1 point

Total 27 points

14

AZ Learns Classification Ranges

Excelling 19-27 points

Highly Performing 16-18.9 points

Performing Plus 16-27 points*

Performing 13-15.9

Underperforming < 13 points

15

Percent of Students who Exceed the Standard (Z Score)

Excelling Z ≥ 1.0

Highly Performing Z ≥ 0.45

Performing Plus Z ≥ 0.45

16

Excelling Schools

Altadena Esperanza Mirada

Akimel A-al Estrella Monte Vista

Aprende Lagos Paloma

Brisas Manitas Sierra

Cerritos Mariposa Waggoner

Cielo Milenio

17

Highly Performing

Centennial Colina Norte

Kyrene Middle School

Lomas Sureno

Pueblo Ninos

18

Questions About AZ Learns

19

AIMS Charts

• The following charts depict Kyrene’s performance compared to the State of Arizona and NCLB expectations and standards

20

Kyrene School District

Closing the Gaps in Grade 3 AIMS Reading

0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB

10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress

StateExpectedProgressStateActual

2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2

Kyrene Performance

State Performance

State Expected Progress

21



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress


Kyrene Performance

State Performance


2005, 2006 , 2007 & 2008 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2

22



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


23



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


24



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


25



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance

State Expected

26


Closing the Gaps in Grade 3 AIMS Math

0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress

StateExpectedProgress

StateActual


Kyrene Performance

State Performance


27



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


28



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


29

Kyrene School DistrictClosing the Gaps in Grade 6 AIMS Math

0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress


Kyrene Performance

State Performance



30



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress


Kyrene Performance

State Performance



31



0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


10

0%

by

20

14

NecessaryProgress

NoProgress



Kyrene Performance

State Performance


32

AIMS-DPA Writing ResultsPercentage of Students in Meets and Exceeds Category

State Kyrene State Kyrene State Kyrene State Kyrene

Grade 3 73 87 52 72 81 92 76 88

Grade 4 62 84 66 84 79 91 70 81

Grade 5 66 85 57 75 67 80 65 78

Grade 6 69 84 87 95 79 89 72 81

Grade 7 79 92 89 97 82 92 65 79

Grade 8 79 92 78 89 73 87 76 89

Meets/Exceeds2005

Meets/Exceeds2006

Meets/Exceeds2007

Meets/Exceeds2008

33

Questions About AIMS Reading, Math, and Writing

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Documents

Transcript of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)