Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission ......Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission...

Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission Statement (May 2017)

The following documents are provided

1. Agreed notes of the most recent Duty To Cooperate Engagement meetings with adjoining

authorities as follows:

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Sheffield City Council

Kirklees Council

Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

Peak Park Planning Authority / High Peak District Council

2. An example of the email sent to each of the adjoining authorities including specific reference

to the change in the commuting ratio sensitivities applied within the SHMA addendum.

3. Adjoining Local Authority confirmation that there are no outstanding Duty to Cooperate

issues with regard to the Barnsley Local Plan.

4. Letter from Natural England concerning the Barnsley Local Plan Habitats Regulations

Assessment Post Publication Changes

5. Letter from Historic England confirming that in developing the Local Plan the Council have

complied with Duty to Cooperate

1. Agreed notes of the most recent Duty To Cooperate Engagement meetings with adjoining

authorities as follows:

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Sheffield City Council

Kirklees Council

Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

Peak Park Planning Authority / High Peak District Council

Barnsley Local Plan (BLP)

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Doncaster MBC

Wednesday 15th March 2017 – Doncaster MBC offices

Summary Note of Meeting (appended to this note is the agenda for the

meeting which included references to BLP website and documentation)

1. Attendees - DMBC: Jeremy Johnson (JRJ), Richard Purcell (RP), Nicola Ward (NW),

David Edwards (DE) – BMBC Joe Jenkinson (JJ) and Alan Hart (AH)

2. JJ summarised the BLP Examination position – BLP submitted 23rd December

2016 - Inspector Mrs Sarah Housden appointed- first stage of examination 16th-

25th May 2017 – see https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5640/id004-barnsley-

lp-examination-stage-1-draft-hearing-timetable.pdf - and Inspectors Main

Issues and Questions for Stage 1 received - see

https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5642/id003-barnsley-local-plan-

examination-stage-1-matters-issues-and-questions.pdf

3. The substantive issues raised by the Inspector were –

a. clarification of OAHN – see submitted addendum to SHMA

https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5488/barnsley-2017-shma-

addendum-report-1703-final-a.pdf and updated Housing Background

Paper https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5487/local-plan-housing-

background-paper-version-2-march-2017final.pdf and

b. BLP implications arising from the recently published Housing White

Paper (HWP) - issues being reviewed but some of the HWP proposals

not accommodated in the BLP eg specific provision for small sites

4. AH confirmed that references to the A635 traffic and air quality from

transportation issues (including specific reference to consultation with

Doncaster) had been included in the submitted BLP minor modifications.

5. JRJ and colleagues confirmed previous DMBC DtC position on BLP and that DMBC

were making provision to meet the Doncaster OAHN within its local planning

policies and proposals. At this time Doncaster has not been asked to provide for

meeting neighbouring LA’s OAHN.

6. JRJ summarily updated the meeting as to Doncaster Local Plan (DLP) plan current

activities – looking to consult on publication version in autumn 2017.

7. Emerging cross boundary issues discussed were:

a. Pan Northern Road – AH confirmed that the submitted BLP modifications

and Transport Background Paper included text references to this

emerging proposal - the potential for a joint position statement would be

considered.

https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5640/id004-barnsley-lp-examination-stage-1-draft-hearing-timetable.pdf


https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5642/id003-barnsley-local-plan-examination-stage-1-matters-issues-and-questions.pdf


https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5488/barnsley-2017-shma-addendum-report-1703-final-a.pdf


https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5487/local-plan-housing-background-paper-version-2-march-2017final.pdf


b. HS2 route refinement consultation – DMBC prefer original ‘Meadowhall’

route and station provision – noted that HS2 and Sheffield City Region

secretariat have various work streams in prospect dependent on the

Government’s decision as to the selected route and station provision.

8. The meeting closed confirming the intent to maintain positive Local Plan dialogue

both on a 1-1 basis and also through the various Sheffield City Region

mechanisms.

Alan Hart 20th April 2017

Appendix; Agenda for BMBC / DMBC Barnsley Local Plan DtC meeting.

Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Doncaster MBC

Wednesday 15th March 2017 – Doncaster MBC offices

DRAFT AGENDA

1. Welcome and introductions

2. Local Plan position

a. Barnsley Local Plan - submission - examination programme - timetable

b. Doncaster Local Plan position update

3. Policy

a. Barnsley Local Plan – shown in Publication version together with submitted modifications

informed by consultation comments

b. Doncaster Council comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross boundary interest

c. Doncaster Local Plan – policy issues / policies of cross boundary interest

4. Sites

a. Barnsley Local Plan Site Policies –

b. Doncaster Council comments on Barnsley Local Plan sites of cross boundary interest

c. Doncaster Local Plan – emerging site proposals of cross boundary interest

6. Any other business

Please see the Barnsley Local Plan Examination website

https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/services/planning-and-buildings/local-planning-and-development/our-

new-local-plan/local-plan-examination-library/ and in particular the Library which includes:

• SD2 Publication Draft

• SD8 Statement of Consultation – structure is as the Local Plan Chapters

• SD30 Local Plan Minor Modifications – again in chapter order

• SD15 Duty to Cooperate Statement – gives a summary review of consultation with

prescribed bodies prior to submission

• BP1 Strategy Background Paper

• BP2 Green Belt and Safeguarded Land Background Paper –

• BP3 Housing Background Paper

• BP4 Housing Trajectory (Appendix to Housing Background Paper)

• BP5 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople

• BP6 Employment Background Paper

• BP7 Transport Background Paper

https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/services/planning-and-buildings/local-planning-and-development/our-new-local-plan/local-plan-examination-library/


There is also evidence material shown in papers EB1-EB 118 (local), EB119-EB 141 (city region) and

EB 142-EB171 (national).

Alan Hart 13th March 2017


Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Rotherham MBC

Tuesday 14th March 2017 – RMBC offices 11am



1. Attendees - RMBC: Andy Duncan (AD) and Ryan Shepherd (RS) – BMBC Emma

Coveney (EC) and Alan Hart (AH)

2. EC summarised the BLP Examination position – BLP submitted 23rd December
















4. AD and RS confirmed previous supportive RMBC DtC position on BLP and that

RMBC were making provision to meet the Rotherham OAHN as established in the

adopted Core Strategy (2014) within its accompanying Sites and Policies

document. At this time Rotherham has not been asked to provide for meeting

any neighbouring LA’s OAHN.

5. AD and RS summarily updated the Rotherham local plan current activities as

being that the Sites and Policies document had been submitted in March 2016

and hearings completed in December 2016 – the future timetable (indicative at

this time) will include consultation on additional housing sites (two sites within

the Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton Bierlow and West Melton settlement

grouping) in summer 2017, consultation on the Inspector’s proposed Main

Modifications in Autumn 2017 with possible adoption in late 2017 / early 2018

following receipt of the Inspector’s final report.

6. Emerging cross boundary issues discussed were:









a. Historic England support for the BMBC submitted Elsecar Heritage Action

Zone (includes part of Rotherham associated with the ‘Fitzwilliam estate’)

b. HS2 route refinement consultation – RMBC prefer original ‘Meadowhall’

route and station provision – noted that HS2 and Sheffield City Region

secretariat have various work streams in prospect dependent on the

Government’s decision as to the selected route and station provision.


both on a 1-1 basis and also through the various Sheffield City Region

mechanisms.


Appendix; Agenda for BMBC / RMBC Barnsley Local Plan DtC meeting.

Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Rotherham MBC

Tuesday 14th March 2017 – RMBC offices 11am

DRAFT AGENDA




b. Rotherham Local Plan position update

3. Policy

a. Barnsley Local Plan – shown in Publication version together with submitted modifications


b. Rotherham Council comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross boundary interest

c. Rotherham Local Plan – policy issues / policies of cross boundary interest

4. Sites


b. Rotherham Council comments on Barnsley Local Plan sites of cross boundary interest

c. Rotherham Local Plan – emerging site proposals of cross boundary interest

5. Rotherham Local Plan – Examination – observations of RMBC




















EB 142-EB171 (national). Alan Hart 7th March 2017


Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Sheffield CC

Monday 13th March 2017 – SCC offices



1. Attendees - SCC: Maria Duffy (MD) and Laura Stephens (LS) – BMBC Paula Tweed

(PT) and Emma Coveney (EC).

2. PT summarised the BLP Examination position – BLP submitted 23rd December
















4. MD and LS confirmed previous SCC DtC position on BLP and that SCC currently

were making provision to meet the Sheffield OAHN within its local planning

policies and proposals and supported the BLP Oughtibridge allocation and

planning application approval as contributing to Sheffield’s OAHN and not BLP.

5. MD and LS summarily updated the Sheffield local plan current activities as being

that SCC are looking to a draft Sheffield Local Plan (SLP) for being consulted upon

in autumn 2017 with a timetable targeting adoption in 2019.

6. The meeting closed confirming the intent to maintain positive Local Plan

dialogue both on a 1-1 basis and also through the various Sheffield City Region

mechanisms.

Paul Tweed 20th April 2017









Appendix; Agenda for BMBC / SCC Barnsley Local Plan DtC meeting.

Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Sheffield City Council

Monday 13th March 2017 - Sheffield CC offices 9.30am

DRAFT AGENDA



a.Barnsley Local Plan - submission - examination programme - timetable

b.Sheffield Local Plan position update

3. Policy

a.Barnsley Local Plan – shown in Publication version together with submitted modifications


b.Sheffield CC comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross boundary interest

c.Sheffield Local Plan – policy issues / emerging policies of cross boundary interest

4. Sites

a.Barnsley Local Plan Site Policies –

b.Sheffield CC comments on Barnsley Local Plan sites of cross boundary interest

c.Sheffield Local Plan – emerging site proposals of cross boundary interest



















Alan Hart 1st March 2017




Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Kirklees MDC (KMDC)

Monday 13th March 2017 – BMBC Westgate Plaza offices



1. Attendees - KMDC: Richard Hollinson (RH) John Buddle (JB) – BMBC Paula Tweed

(PT) and Emma Coveney (EC).

















4. RH and JB confirmed previous KMDC DtC position on BLP and that KMDC

currently were making provision to meet the Kirklees OAHN within its local

planning policies and proposals. This was consistent with position of all Leeds CR

LAs. KMDC supported the Penistone railway route improvements sought by BLP

but at this stage KMDC would not prioritise development around its Penistone

line stations.

5. RH reported that Kirklees were looking to submit the Kirklees Local Plan in April

2017.RH also referred to a Kirklees / Historic England Statement of Common

Ground and agreed to share with BMBC.

6. The meeting closed confirming the intent to maintain positive Local Plan

dialogue both on a 1-1 basis and also through the various Leeds City Region

mechanisms.

Paul Tweed 20th April 2017









Appendix; Agenda for BMBC / Kirklees MDC Barnsley Local Plan DtC meeting.

Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Kirklees MDC

Monday 13th March 2017 – Barnsley MBC Westgate Plaza offices

DRAFT AGENDA




b.Kirklees Local Plan position update

3. Policy



b.Kirklees MDC comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross boundary interest

c. Kirklees Local Plan – policy issues / emerging policies of cross boundary interest

4. Sites


b.KMDC comments on Barnsley Local Plan sites of cross boundary interest

c. KMDC Local Plan – emerging site proposals of cross boundary interest























Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Wakefield MDC (WMDC)

Friday 10th March 2017 – BMBC Westgate Plaza offices



1. Attendees - WMDC: Neville Ford (NF) Rob Ellis (RE) – BMBC Paula Tweed (PT) and

Alan Hart (AH).

















4. NF and RE confirmed previous WMDC DtC position on BLP and that WMDC have

a full suite of adopted local planning documents including recently (January

2017) adopted Recreation Leisure and Open Space and Retail and Town Centre

local plans. WMDC are beginning the mobilisation for preparing a replacement

local plan.

5. AH was to review whether the submitted BLP (including proposed minor

modifications) included reference to cross boundary liaison on transport

assessments, travel plan statements or travel plans in respect of development

proposals in proximity to the Wakefield/Barnsley border. Subsequent to the

meeting BMBC would seek to clarify this requirement by suggesting a minor

modification to policy T3 (see footnote).

6. Discussion identified that issues relating to the Government’s intention to

promote a new high speed railway (HS2 eastern leg) and possible parkway

station on to serve South Yorkshire would (if confirmed) be a significant cross

boundary issue.










both on a 1-1 basis and also through the various Leeds City Region mechanisms.

Footnote to show highlighted in emboldened red proposed minor modification to T3

Policy T3 New Development and Sustainable Travel

New development will be expected to:

• be located and designed to reduce the need to travel, be accessible to public

transport and meet the needs of pedestrians and cyclists

• provide at least the minimum levels of parking for cycles, motorbikes, scooters,

mopeds and disabled people, and should not provide more than the maximum number of

car parking spaces set out in the relevant Supplementary Planning Document

• provide a transport statement or assessment in line with the guidance set out in

Planning Policy Guidance as published and meeting provisions of NPPF paragraphs 32 and 36

including where appropriate, regard to cross boundary local authority liaison.

• provide a travel plan statement or a travel plan in accordance with guidance set out

in Planning Policy Guidance as published and meeting provisions of NPPF paragraphs 32 and

36 including where appropriate, regard to cross boundary local authority liaison. Travel

plans will be secured through a planning obligation or a planning condition

Where levels of accessibility through public transport, cycling and walking are unacceptable,

we will expect developers to take action or make financial contributions in accordance with

policy I1

If it is not possible or appropriate for the minimum amount of parking for cycles,

motorbikes, scooters and mopeds to be met on site, the developer must provide, or

contribute towards, off-site parking, or improve or provide other forms of travel.


Appendix: Agenda for BMBC / Wakefield MDC Barnsley Local Plan DtC meeting.

Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Wakefield MDC

Friday 10th March 2017 – Barnsley MBC Westgate Plaza offices

DRAFT AGENDA




b.Wakefield MDC Local Plan position update

3. Policy



b.Wakefield MDC comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross boundary interest

c. Wakefield MDC Local Planning – policy issues / emerging policies of cross boundary

interest

4. Sites


b.WMDC comments on Barnsley Local Plan sites of cross boundary interest

c. WMDC Local Plan – emerging site proposals of cross boundary interest























Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Peak Park / High Peak

21st March 2017 – BMBC Westgate Plaza offices



1. Attendees – Brian Taylor Peak Park (BT) – BMBC Paula Tweed (PT) and Alan Hart (AH).

2. PT summarised the BLP Examination position – BLP submitted 23rd December 2016 -

Inspector Mrs Sarah Housden appointed- first stage of examination 16th-25th May 2017 –

see https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5640/id004-barnsley-lp-examination-stage-1-

draft-hearing-timetable.pdf - and Inspectors Main Issues and Questions for Stage 1

received - see https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5642/id003-barnsley-local-plan-



a. clarification of Objectively Assessed Housing Need (OAHN) – see submitted

addendum to SHMA https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5488/barnsley-2017-

shma-addendum-report-1703-final-a.pdf and updated Housing Background



b. BLP implications arising from the recently published Housing White Paper

(HWP) - issues being reviewed but some of the HWP proposals not

accommodated in the BLP eg specific provision for small sites

4. BT summarised Peak Park engagement in Highways England route studies including long

term possibility of a road tunnel crossing the Peak Park. It was noted that the various

options for the route had implications for Barnsley if and when confirmed.

5. BT updated on the position of the Peak Park approach to identifying potential areas of

minimum impact on the Peak Park and which might be considered for housing and

employment development as part of liaison between Peak Park and High Peak

authorities.

6. PT confirmed the approach of the BLP to wind turbine proposals was to identify areas of

search based on landscape classification by way of its ability to absorb wind turbines of

different specification eg height etc. The BLP approach was informed by BMBC being a

participant along with neighbouring authorities in the ‘South Pennines Wind Energy

Landscape Study’.

7. BT confirmed there were no issues of concern regarding the BLP requiring attendance of

Peak Park at the BLP examination hearings.

8. The meeting closed confirming the intent to maintain positive Local Plan dialogue both

on a 1-1 basis and also through the various BMBC/Sheffield city Region mechanisms.

Alan Hart 15th May 2017









Barnsley Local Plan

Post Submission Duty to Co-operate engagement – Peak Park/High Peak

Tuesday 21st March 2017 – BMBC offices 11.00am L3R1

AGENDA




b. Peak Park / High Peak Local Plan position update

11. Policy

a. Barnsley Local Plan – shown in Publication version together with submitted

modifications informed by consultation comments

b. Peak Park / High Peak comments on Barnsley Local Plan policies of cross

boundary interest

c. Peak Park / High Peak Local Plan – any emerging policy issues / policies of cross

boundary interest

12. Sites


b. Peak Park / High Peak comments on Barnsley Local Plan site policies of cross

boundary interest

c. Peak Park / High Peak Local Plan – any site policies of cross boundary interest


Please see the Barnsley Local Plan Examination website https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/services/planning-and-buildings/local-planning-and-development/our-new-local-plan/local-plan-examination-library/ and in particular the Library which includes:

SD2 Publication Draft

SD8 Statement of Consultation – structure is as the Local Plan Chapters

SD30 Local Plan Minor Modifications – again in chapter order

SD15 Duty to Cooperate Statement – gives a summary review of consultation with prescribed bodies prior to submission

BP1 Strategy Background Paper

BP2 Green Belt and Safeguarded Land Background Paper –

BP3 Housing Background Paper

BP4 Housing Trajectory (Appendix to Housing Background Paper)

BP5 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople

BP6 Employment Background Paper

BP7 Transport Background Paper There is also evidence material shown in papers EB1-EB 118 (local), EB119-EB 141 (city region) and EB 142-EB171 (national).

Alan Hart 20th March 2017



2. An example of the email sent to each of the adjoining authorities including specific

reference to the change in the commuting ratio sensitivities applied within the SHMA

addendum.

1

Subject: FW: Barnsley Local Plan Post Submission DtC meeting

From: Sent:To:Cc: Subject: Barnsley Local Plan Post Submission DtC meeting Dear Following the recent Duty to Cooperate meeting with you about progress with the examination of our Local Plan, please see attached a draft note of the meeting which it would be helpful if you would confirm / suggest amendments so that there can be an agreed note. I can confirm that we have completed the SHMA addendum and updated the Housing Background Paper (BP3) as discussed at the DtC meeting. We are proposing our OAHN as a range from 967 dwellings per annum to 1398 dwellings per annum. Within this range we propose to set our housing requirement at 1100 dwellings per annum. The documents can be found using the following links. https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5488/barnsley‐2017‐shma‐addendum‐report‐1703‐final‐a.pdf https://www.barnsley.gov.uk/media/5487/local‐plan‐housing‐background‐paper‐version‐2‐march‐2017final.pdf You may be interested in the sensitivities that have been applied to commuting ratios which have been reduced from 1.25 to 1.19 (1.19 is the figure from 2001 census therefore we are using a ratio that has been achieved in the past). The SHMA addendum considers a slight change reasonable, which implies that as the number of jobs in Barnsley increases a higher proportion of the workforce would live in Barnsley. Our view is that the implications of this from a DtC perspective will be minimal. It is not uncommon for a dwelling to accommodate more than one person that travel to work within different authorities. Please let me know if you have any comments on the above. In addition it may be helpful if you would to set out the position of your authority in respect to whether it would be able to accommodate any of our housing need, should the question arise during the examination process. Many thanks Kind regards,

3. Adjoining Local Authority confirmation that there are no outstanding Duty to Cooperate

issues with regard to the Barnsley Local Plan.

The following email was sent to the Local Authorities adjoining the Barnsley Borough on 15th May

2017.

“Dear Colleague

The Barnsley Local Plan Examination Hearings starts tomorrow, 16th May at 10am, led by Inspector

Sarah Housden. In order to update the Inspector with a final position on Duty to Cooperate and Legal

Compliance we will inform the Inspector that there are no outstanding issues with respect to your

authority and the content and policies of the Barnsley Local Plan.

We would be grateful if you could reply by return to confirm this position.

Kind regards”

The following email replies of confirmation were received.

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 15.05.17

“Regarding Duty to Cooperate and the Barnsley Local Plan I can confirm that Doncaster Council has

no outstanding issues with respect to the content and the policies.

Please let me know if you require any further information.”

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 15.05.2017

“I can confirm there are no outstanding issues between Barnsley MBC and Rotherham MBC regarding the Barnsley Local Plan.”

Kirklees Council 16.05.17

“I can confirm that there are no outstanding issues between our authorities and the content and

policies of the Barnsley Local Plan.”

Peak Park Planning Authority/High Peak District Council 22.05.17

“Further to the meeting on the 21st March and follow up emails I can confirm that there are no

outstanding cross boundary issues with respect to the Barnsley Local Plan and its impact on the Peak

District National Park.”

Sheffield City Council 15.05.17

“Thank you for your email regarding the Barnsley Local Plan Examination Hearings. I can confirm

that there are no outstanding issues between our Authorities as regards the content and policies of

the Barnsley Plan.”

Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 15.05.17

“I can confirm there are no outstanding Duty to Cooperate issues or strategic matters in respect of

Wakefield Council relating to the Barnsley Local Plan with its associated modifications.”

4. Letter from Natural England concerning the Barnsley Local Plan Habitats Regulations

Assessment Post Publication Changes

Date: 03 March 2017 Our ref: 208784

Paula Tweed Planning Policy Group Leader, Planning Policy Economic Regeneration Service Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council

BY EMAIL ONLY

Customer Services

Hornbeam House

Crewe Business Park

Electra Way

Crewe

Cheshire

CW1 6GJ

T 0300 060 3900

Dear Paula Planning consultation: Barnsley Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment post publication changes Thank you for your consultation. Natural England is a non-departmental public body. Our statutory purpose is to ensure that the natural environment is conserved, enhanced, and managed for the benefit of present and future generations, thereby contributing to sustainable development. We are grateful for the opportunity to work with Barnsley Council over the past months to address the concerns raised by Natural England in our letter dated 18 August 2016 (our ref 189247). Natural England welcomes the modifications and clarifications set out in the Barnsley Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Submission Version dated December 2016 which we consider to fully satisfy the concerns raised by Natural England regarding the Habitats Regulations Assessment at publication draft stage. We note that there have been no substantial updates to the assessment of recreational pressures subsequent to the November 2016 revision of the Habitats Regulation Assessment. Natural England considers that this section would benefit from further clarification, as noted in our response dated 14 December 2016 (our ref 196846), however we are broadly satisfied with your conclusions that the plan will not lead to adverse effects on the integrity of the South Pennine Moors European designated sites, based on the information provided. We would be happy to comment further should the need arise but if in the meantime you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact us. For any queries relating to the specific advice in this letter please contact Merlin Ash at

or on For any new consultations, or to provide further information on this consultation please send your correspondences to [email protected].

mailto:[email protected]

We really value your feedback to help us improve the service we offer. We have attached a feedback form to this letter and welcome any comments you might have about our service. Yours sincerely Emma Brown Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Team Natural England

5. Letter from Historic England confirming that in developing the Local Plan the Council have

complied with Duty to Cooperate

Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission ......Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission...

Documents

Transcript of Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission ......Addendum to SD15 Duty to Cooperate Submission...