Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba
description
Transcript of Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba
![Page 1: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Less than 10% of star formation in zLess than 10% of star formation in z~~0.6 0.6 massive galaxies is directly triggered by massive galaxies is directly triggered by
galaxy mergersgalaxy mergers
Aday R. Robaina&
Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba
+ GEMS & STAGES teams
Kuala Lumpur, April 1st, 2009
![Page 2: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Le Fèvre et al. (2000) Madau et al. (1996)
Back in the late 90´s…
…it was believed that the evolution of the merger rate could drive the
decrease of the SFR density
![Page 3: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Bell et al. 2005
Star formation in major galaxy mergers < 35% (Hammer et al. 04, Bell et al.05, Wolf et al. 05)
• How enhanced is the SFR by major galaxy interactions?
• What fraction of the SFR is directly triggered by major galaxy interactions?
Galaxy mergers don’t drive the evolution in the CSFH, but…
How much do they contribute to the stellar-mass growth?
![Page 4: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The sample:
• COMBO-17 redshifts, colors and stellar masses (ECDFS+A901/2 ~0.5 sqdeg)
• GEMS and STAGES HST/ACS morphologies
• Spitzer/MIPS deep 24 μm
• Stellar-mass cut = 1010 M, 0.4<z<0.8
The method:
• SFR-weighted 2-point correlation functions
• Visual morphologies
![Page 5: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Our weighted 2-point correlation function in a nutshell
Two subsamples defined
• Star forming galaxies (blue and/or 24 μm detected)
• All galaxies
• Mass ratio between 1:4 and 1:1
Weights used: Either SFR of SSFR
Enhancement:)(1
)(1)(
P
PP rw
rWrE
W(rP) → Weighted correlation function
w(rP) → unweighted correlation function
![Page 6: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SF-SF autocorrelation
Pairing up star forming galaxies with star forming galaxies
![Page 7: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SF-All cross-correlation
Pairing up star forming galaxies with all galaxies
![Page 8: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Extremely close pairs:
Merger remnants:
![Page 9: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EnhancementSFR / M*
Selected as a pair
Morphologically selected
• Clear enhancement out to 40 kpc
• Weak enhancement (ε=1.5-2) on average respect to pairs of isolated galaxies
• SFR-weighted enhancement agrees within 20% with the SFR/M* weighted
![Page 10: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Comparing with previous results
SFR/M*-weighted SF-All cross-correlation
• Excellent agreement with Li et al. (2008) at z=0.1 within 40 kpc
• Excellent agreement with Lin et al. (2007) at z=1
SFR (or SFR/M*) enhancement seems to scale with the pre-existing (quiescent) SFR
This work, z = 0.6
SDSS, z = 0.1
![Page 11: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Dominated by isolated
disks
Increasing interaction fraction
Then... galaxy mergers don’t trigger intense bursts of star formation?
Actually they do:
• Process of interaction up to 2.5 Gyr
• Intense burst ~ 100 Myr
(Di Matteo et al. 2007, Cox et al. 2008)
![Page 12: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Nothing new under the sun...
Barton et al. (2000), Barton et al. (2003), Lambas et al. (2003), Alonso et al. (2004), Lin et al. (2007), Barton et al. (2007), Li et al. (2008), Ellison et al. (2008), Jogee et al. (2009)...
• Major interactions mildly enhance the star formation activity
• Interacting systems host < 35% of the SFR density
• Amount of dissipation crucial to understand the properties of present day massive galaxies.
• Galaxy mergers stop star formation. Do they deplete the cold gas or something different is going on?
We need to know the amount of extra dissipation
directly triggered by major mergers.
![Page 13: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A recipe for directly-triggered SFR
Ingredients:
• Averaged SFR enhancement (ε)
• Number of galaxies undergoing interactions (Ngalfpair, proj)
(from unweighted 2-point correlation function)
• Averaged SFR in galaxy pairs ( SFRtypical,pair≠ 2 × SFRgal )
• Total SFR in merger remnants (SFRrem,tot)
• Number of remnants
Directly triggered SFR = 8±3%pairtypicalgal
pairtypicalremtotrempairtypicalprojpairgaltriggSFR SFRN
SFRNSFRSFRfNF
,
,,,,., 5.0
)()1(5.0
![Page 14: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Confronting the theory and putting in context
• When considering all stages and all kinds of interactions, major mergers
only trigger small enhancements in the SF activity (ε=1.5-1.8)
Di Matteo et al. (2007), Cox et al. (2008):
ε=1.25-1.5 on average during 2-2.5 Gyr of the interaction
• Not in conflict with the idea that the strongest starbursts are triggered by major mergers
• Only a modest fraction (~8%) of the SFR is directly triggered by major mergers and interactions.
Using mock catalogues from Somerville et al. (2008): Triggered fraction= 7%
• Enhancement independent from pre-existing level of SFR/gas fraction
Di Matteo (2009): Enhancement independent from gas fraction
![Page 15: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Conclusions:
• SFR (and SFR/M*) in 0.4<z<0.8 massive galaxies enhanced by a factor of 1.5-1.8 due to major mergers
• Enhancement scales with the pre-existing (non-bursty) SFR
• Directly triggered SFR fraction ~ 8%
• Star formation triggered by major mergers does not significantly impact the growth of stellar mass at z<1
![Page 16: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Noeske et al. 2007
Khochfar 2007
85% of the stars in classic bulges and ellipticals of M* > 1010 Msun have to be formed in quiescent modeM
qu
iesc
/Mb
urs
t
![Page 19: Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815231550346895dc07823/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)