Ada resurface apwa_2016_presentation
-
Upload
florida-public-works-expo-2016-tampa-florida -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
202 -
download
0
Transcript of Ada resurface apwa_2016_presentation
Title II of the ADA
Applies to:
Facilities built after 1990;
Pre-existing facilities;
All public entities, such as State and local governments, even if they are not recipients of federal funding.
Objectives
• Review technical bulletins 2013/2015 in regards to adjacent ADA curb ramps and sidewalk during resurfacing (alterations) of roadways.
• General discussion of building a new ramp.
• General discussion of Sidewalks
• Actions that the City of Lakeland is taking to comply with ADA /Transition Plan rules
Authority Agencies
• The Department of Justice (DOJ) has rulemaking authority and enforcement responsibility for Title II
• DOJ’s and DOT’s (FDOT) ADA Standards constitute design and construction requirements issued under a civil rights law.
• Entities covered by the law ultimately are responsible for ensuring compliance with the ADA Standards in new construction and alterations.
Confusion???
• For most municipalities, there is confusion between the intent of the ADA, as a civil rights law, and various related design guidelines such as UFAS, ADAAG, PROWAAG, FDOT, and DOJ standards.
Litigation Avoidance
• Chicago agrees to Pay Largest ADA Curb Ramp Settlement Ever -- $50,000,000 in New Money (5 years)
• Caltrans settles lawsuit over disabled access -The agency proposes to spend $1.1 billion to ease use of sidewalks, crosswalks and park-and-ride facilities. (30 years)
• Penn DOT ramping up efforts on curb cuts -Lawsuits prompt budgeting of $820 million to improve access for disabled (10 years)
Litigation Avoidance(closer to home)
• Justice Department Reaches Settlement Agreement with City of Jacksonville, Fla., to Ensure Civic Access for People with Disabilities
• Justice Department agreement between United States of America and City of Fort Myers under the American with Disabilities Act DJ:204-17M-413
More Questions Resurfacing of Roadways
How Did This Joint DOJ/DOT (FHWA)Technical Assistance Come About?
Alterations vs. Maintenance
Prior DOT guidance from September 2006 stated
More specific examples of alterations and maintenance
Including distinction between structural resurfacing (alteration) and non-structural resurfacing (maintenance)
Different levels of specificity defining alterations between DOJ and DOT created:
Confusion in application
Inconsistency in enforcement
Questions from stakeholders
BRIEFING MEMO SUBJECT: Department of Justice/Department of Transportation Joint Technical
Assistance on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act Requirements to Provide Curb Ramps when Streets, Roads, or Highways are Altered through Resurfacing
ISSUE: Throughout the nation, there are different interpretations and inconsistencies in
enforcement of when curb ramps are required.
ADA Maintenance ADA Alterations
Cra
ck F
illi
ng
and
Sea
lin
gSu
rfac
e Se
alin
gC
hip
Sea
lsSl
urr
y Se
als
Fo
g Se
als
Scru
b S
eali
ng
Join
t C
rack
Sea
lsJo
int
rep
airs
Do
wel
Bar
Ret
rofi
tSp
ot
Hig
h-F
rict
ion
Tre
atm
ents
Dia
mo
nd
Gri
nd
ing
Pav
emen
t P
atch
ing
Op
en-g
rad
ed S
urf
ace
Co
urs
eC
ape
Seal
sM
ill &
Fil
l / M
ill &
Ove
rlay
Ho
t In
-Pla
ce R
ecyc
lin
gM
icro
surf
acin
g/T
hin
Lif
t
Ove
rlay
Ad
dit
ion
of
New
Lay
er o
f A
sph
alt
A
sph
alt
and
Co
ncr
ete
Reh
abil
itat
ion
an
dR
eco
nst
ruct
ion
New
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Joint DOJ/DOT (FHWA)Technical Assistance
Joint Technical Assistance
Distinguishes alterations from maintenance based on the type of road treatment:
Chip Seals Fog Seals Scrub Sealing
Crack Filling and Sealing Joint Crack Seals Slurry Seals
Diamond Grinding Joint repairs Spot High-Friction Treatments
Dowel Bar Retrofit Pavement Patching Surface Sealing
Addition of New Layer of Asphalt Mill & Fill / Mill & Overlay
Cape Seals New Construction
Hot In-Place Recycling Open-graded Surface Course
Microsurfacing / Thin-Lift Overlay Rehabilitation and Reconstruction
Part 35 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services Act Title II regulations
(as amended by the final rule published on September 15, 2010
Compliance Date for New Construction or Alterations
Applicable Standards
Before September 15, 2010 1991 Standards or UFAS
On or after September 15, 2010, and before March 15, 2012
1991 Standards, UFAS, or2010 Standards
On or after March 15, 2012 2010 Standards
Appendix
35.151(c)
On or after March 15, 2012 2010 Standards
• City of Lakeland looked at above date and began looking at prior years resurfacing programs.
• Utilized the PROWAAG requirements
• Stopped all planned resurfacing until ramps along previous resurfacing we brought of to new standards
• Utilized GIS to identify ramps adjacent to resurfaced roads.
• We were not alone…
ADA
Complianc
e Training
ADA Law Requires
• Overlays and resurfacing =
alteration.
Curb ramps must meet the latest
standards. As per Federal court
case (Kinney vs. Yerusallim, 813 F.
Supp. 547 F.D. PA 1993)
Resurfacing
improved/altered
the crosswalk
28 C.F.R. § 35.151(b) Alterations have to be made readily accessible,
within the impacting project, to the maximum extent feasible.
Kinney v. Yerusalim - Court held that the
Resurfacing constituted
an alteration
ADA 2010 (PROWAAG) some of requirements
• Clear Width
• The curb ramp must be clear of obstacles within the required clear width of 48 inches. This clear width applies to the pedestrian access route within the ramp, which includes the ramp run, exclusive of flared sides.
• Detectable Warning Surface
• Curb ramps shall have a detectable warning surface consisting of truncated domes extending along the full width of the curb ramp.
• Turning Space or Level Landing
• A minimum 4’ x 4’ turning space shall be provided at the bottom of a parallel curb ramp or the top of a perpendicular curb ramp. If the turning space is constrained on 2 or more sides, the turning space shall be 4’ x 5’. The 5’ dimension is in the direction of the street crossing.
• The maximum slope of the turning space is 2%
Action steps
• Created a checklist to determine if existing ramps along planned resurfacing met 2010 compliant.
• Initially had engineer go out with form contained within an Ipad.
• Once determination was made to replace contract was put in place to begin rebuilding ramps
• Learning process between divisions as well as contractor. What is best way to build
What division has final say of design??Engineering/Maintenance
More on that later…..
Cost of New Ramps
• 84 (number of ramps built)
• Sidewalk 4” associated with Ramp $5,568
• ADA Ramp 6” $74,263
• Brick Repair (Crosswalks etc) $699.00
• Domes $25,988
• Asphalt Repair (COL Crews) $17,087
• Total $123,605
2013 Again what we previously pursued
• An important part of this requirement is the obligation whenever streets, roadways, or highways are altered to provide curb ramps where street level pedestrian walkways cross curbs. This requirement is intended to ensure the accessibility and usability of the pedestrian walkway for persons with disabilities.
December 2015
• Q1: When a pavement treatment is considered an alteration under the ADA and there is a curb ramp at the juncture of the altered road and an existing sidewalk (or other prepared surface for pedestrian use), but the curb ramp does not meet the current ADA Standards, does the curb ramp have to be updated to meet the current ADA Standards at the time of the pavement treatment?
2015 cont..
• Answer (A1): It depends on whether the existing curb ramp meets the appropriate accessibility standard that was in place at the time it was newly constructed or last altered
2015 cont…
• As a result of this “safe harbor” provision, if a curb ramp was built or altered prior to March 15, 2012, and complies with the requirements for curb ramps in either the 1991 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (1991 Standards, known prior to 2010 as the 1991 ADA Accessibility Guidelines, or the 1991 ADAAG) or UFAS, it does not have to be modified to comply with the requirements in the 2010 Standards
Similarities 1991 and 2010 • In order to field verify that a curb ramp is compliant to the 1991 standard,
evaluate the following criteria: • Running Slope • The maximum slope of a ramp run shall not exceed 1:12 (8.3%). This
standard applies to both the 1991 and to current standards.
• Counter Slope • The maximum slope of adjoining gutters, road surface immediately
adjacent to the curb ramp, or accessible route shall not exceed 1:20 (5%). This standard applies to both the 1991 and to current standards.
• If all other criteria meet the 1991 standard, but the existing counter slope exceeds 5%, and the resurfaced road will result in meeting the standard, this criterion alone does not trigger the requirement to upgrade the ramp, because it would be 1991 compliant without performing any work on the ramp.
• Cross Slope • Nowhere shall the cross slope of an accessible route exceed 1:50 (2%). This
standard applies to both the 1991 and to current standards.
Differences between 1991 and 2010• Clear Widths 1991 36” ____ 2010 48”
• No turning space or level landing requirement existed for curb ramps in the 1991 .
• Question- Is Landing required at both top and bottom?
• Answer: • It’s required through FDOT from the ADA Standards for each curb ramp to have a landing at the top (2% max. slope, to provide an opportunity for a wheelchair to pass the curb ramp on the sidewalk) and at the bottom (5% max. slope, to provide transition and maneuvering space).• Dean Perkins, Architect, CPM• ADA Coordinator, Florida DOT
Sidewalks Prior to 2015
• On January 22, 2004, in the case of
Barden v. Sacramento, the 9th Circuit
Court ruled that sidewalks were a
“program” under ADA and must be made
accessible to persons with disabilities
• Previously only curb ramps were looked at during projects.
December 2015 Brief
• Q8: If an existing curb ramp is replaced as part of a resurfacing alteration, is there an obligation to address existing obstacles on the adjacent sidewalk at the same time?
December 2015• A8: No. The Joint Technical Assistance addresses
those requirements that are triggered when a public entity alters a roadway where the roadway intersects a street level pedestrian walkway (28 CFR 35.151(i)). Public entities are required to address other barriers on existing sidewalks, such as steep cross slopes or obstructions, as part of their on-going program access and transition plan obligations under title II of the ADA and Section 504 and in response to requests for reasonable modifications under the ADA or reasonable accommodations under Section 504. See 28 CFR 35.105, 35.130(b)(7), and 35.150(d); see also 49 CFR 27.7(e), 27.11(c)(2).
Basics of Curb Ramps/Sidewalks during resurfacing
• ADA Title II – Public Services
• – Ramps built prior March 15,2012 must meet 1991 specifications for slope.
• – Surface must Stable, Firm, Slip Resistant
• – Must have detectable warning
• – Elevation difference ¼” Max
• – Features on sidewalks and curb ramps must be accessible
ADA
Complianc
e Training
Basic ADA RequirementsSurface - SSttaabbllee,, Firm & Slip RReessiissttaanntt
Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility
ADA
Complianc
e Training
Basic ADA Requirements
• Detectable Warning Surface (DWS)
What is a DWS?
Raised truncated domes in a rectangular array.
Where do you place them?
Placed across the bottom of the curb ramp.
What exactly do they do?
Aid those visually impaired to identify the end of the
ramp.
DWS = Stop
guidance does not specify a particular color but requires the detectable warning to
be a color that contrasts with the sidewalk---light on dark or dark on light
Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility
ADA
Complianc
e Training
Basic ADA Requirements
Elevation
Differences
¼”Max” max
Unexpected vertical drops or vertical rises in grade within the pedestrian path
can cause falls and wheelchairs to bottom out.
Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility
ADA Law Requires
• Existing facilities that have not been altered,
shall not deny access to persons with disabilities
The absence of a
curb ramp denies
access to the
existing sidewalk.
New (Resurfacing) ProjectAs of 12/2015
If it is considered an Alteration
Existing Sidewalks /
Curb Ramps
No
Proceed w/Work
Yes
Meets 1991 or 2010 Standards (Record in GIS)
Yes*
Proceed w/Work
No
Install/Update Curb
Ramps/Sidewalk record in GIS
*If sidewalk work is performed, then
curb ramps must be updated to 2010
standards
City of Lakeland
• Currently have GIS database of all ramps
• Those ramps within resurfacing, will be documented as part of asset of ramp feature if they met 1991 specifications. (Yes/No)
• If not brought up to 2010 standards these ramps will need to be addressed in transition plan.
City of Lakeland Concerns moving forward
• Who performs inspections of over 4,000 ramps?? (Surveyors, Inspectors, Trades workers)
• How to get data into corporate GIS database (IPad utilizing ArcGIS online?)
• Tracking cost of ADA transition plans
Best Practice going forward
• ADA/ Sidewalk complaints seem to be fairly commonplace
• frequently be resolved without the need for costly litigation.
• The best defense to an ADA complaint is compliance with the law.
• Maintain and keep you transitions plans fluid
C ont… To comp ly w i th A DA ev e r y sta te a nd loca l g ov e rnme nt i s re q u i re d to p re p a re s e l f
ev a lua t ion re p ortA DA Tra ns i t ion P la n
• Corrective Measures to be taken
• Implement a schedule for compliancy ( begin with access to public facilities, city programs and services.
• Create a financing plan as well as supportive policies to present to stakeholders/commissioners.
The Future of Facilities within Public
Rights of Way? (FDOT)
• USDOT / FHWA recommends using PROWAG
• criteria where ADA Standards do not address an issue.
• RECOMMENDATION:
• Start learning PROWAG!
• www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.htm