Ad-Hoc Committee on Academic Integrity 2011 Faculty and Student Survey Results Presented at the UAA...
-
Upload
skyler-coatsworth -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
3
Transcript of Ad-Hoc Committee on Academic Integrity 2011 Faculty and Student Survey Results Presented at the UAA...
Ad-Hoc Committee on Academic Integrity
2011 Faculty and Student Survey ResultsPresented at the UAA Faculty Retreat
August 24th, 2011
Presentation Outline
• Survey Methods• Perceptions of Academically Dishonest Behavior• Academically Dishonest Behavior at UAA• Perceptions of Current UAA Policies and Penalties• Reporting of Academically Dishonest Behavior• Where Students Learn About Academic Integrity Policies at UAA
• In charts comparing faculty and students:– Students are represented in Blue– Faculty are represented in Red
Faculty Survey: Method
• Goal was to survey all UAA faculty teaching during Fall 2010 via email
– Email listing of all faculty provided by OAA– 158 faculty responded (66% women; 34% men)– Response rate approximately 21%• Interpret with caution• Results likely don’t represent views of all faculty
UAA Faculty Survey (n=158): Description of Respondents
Assistant Professor34%
Associate Pro-fessor31%
Professor19%
In-structor9%
Other6%
Academic rank
< 5 years16%
5-9 years23%
10-14 years19%
15-19 years15%
20 + years28%
How long have you been teaching at the university
level?
Student Survey: Method• Goal was to survey a random sample of 400-500 students
enrolled in GER classes (at all levels) in Spring 2011 using paper-and-pencil survey in class
• Sampling strategy:– From alphabetical lists of all GER classes (stratified by level), we
randomly chose• Ten 100-level classes• Ten 200-level classes• Thirteen 300- or 400-level classes
– We eliminated distance-only courses as we could not use same methodology
– Contacted each course instructor at end of Fall semester to request time to complete survey during last 20 minutes of class during first few weeks of semester
UAA Student Survey (n=416): SampleGER-Level Total Surveys
CompletedTotal Enrollment in Classes
Response Rate
100-LEVEL GERs:-English A111 (2 sections)-Dance A120-Spanish A102
N=117 N=124 94%
200-LEVEL GERs:-Physics A211-Justice A251-Math A272-Environmental Studies 211
N=128 N=145 88%
300 and 400-LEVEL GERs:-English A305-Political Science A331-Management Inform. Systems A376-Philosophy A314-Biology A365-Construction Management A422-English A434
N=171 N=193 89%
Totals N=416 N=462 90%
UAA Student Survey (n=416): Description of Respondents
•51%: Women•49%: Men
Gender
•28%: < 20 years
•53%: 20-25 years
•12%: 26-30 years
•8%: > 30 years
Age
•21%: First year
•24%: Sophomore
•26%: Junior•20%: Senior•9%: 5th year
or higher
Class Standing
•99%: UAA Main campus
•1%: Kachemak Bay
•<1%: Mat-Su Campus
Campus•79%: In
Alaska•18%: In
US, Non-Alaska
•2%: Outside US
•1%: Military
•1%: not HS grad
High School
•37%: 20+ hours/week
•22%: 10-19 hours/week
•12%: 1-9 hours/week
•29%: not working
Work
Faculty (n=158) and Student (n=416) Disciplines
Social Sciences
Math & Natural Sciences
Other
Business
Humanities
Nursing & Health Professions
Engineering
Undecided
Arts
Communications & Journalism
Interdisciplinary
22%
18%
12%
11%
14%
14%
3%
2%
3%
1%
16%
16%
16%
10%
5%
4%
13%
13%
7%
Student Discipline Faculty Discipline
Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academically Dishonest Behavior
Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Seriousness of Specific Behaviors
Paraphrasing or copying few sent. from elect. source w/out footnoting
Copying (electronically) another student's homework
Copying (by hand or in person) another student's homework
Using false/forged excuse to obtain extension on due date/exam
Fabricating or falsifying a bibliography
Paraphrasing or copying a few sent. from written source w/out citing
Receiving unpermitted help on an assignment
Working w/ others elect. when instructor asked for indiv. work
Working w/ others (in person) when instructor asked for indiv. work
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8033
35
36
36
41
48
52
69
72
14
6
5.5
30
14
15
13
16
17
% Responding behavior is ‘Not Cheating’ or ‘Trivial Cheating’
% Faculty % Students
Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Seriousness of Specific Behaviors
Turning in paper copied, at least in part, from a student
Using electronic device as unauthorized aid during exam
Cheating on a test in any other way
Copying another student's computer program
Using electronic crib notes during a test
Using unpermitted handwritten crib notes during a test
Getting Q/A from someone who has already taken test
Fabricating or falsifying research data
Fabricating or falsifying lab data
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8010
12
12
13
13
15
24
24
31
12
3
2
4
2.5
4
9
9
11
% Responding behavior is ‘Not Cheating’ or ‘Trivial Cheating’
% Faculty % Students
Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Seriousness of Specific Behaviors
Turning in paper from paper mill (written by student)
Copying during a test without his or her knowledge
Copying from another during test with his/her knowledge
Using digital tech to get unpermitted help during an exam
Copying, almost word for word, from any written source
Turning in work done by someone else
Helping someone else cheat on a test
Submitting a paper purchased or obtained from Website
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 807
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
3
2
7
2
2
8
2
2
% Responding behavior is ‘Not Cheating’ or ‘Trivial Cheating’
% Faculty % Students
Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Cheating, Reporting of Academic Dishonesty, and Value of
Assessment at UAA
Cheating is a serious problem at UAA
Students should be held responsible for monitoring the academic integrity of other students
Our student judicial process is fair and impartial
Faculty members are vigilant in discovering and reporting suspected cases of academic dishonesty
The types of assessment used in my courses are effective at helping me/my students learn course concepts
The types of assessment used in my courses are effective at evaluating students understanding of course concepts
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
15
25
35
45
63
65
52
47
40
25
96
94
% Responding either ‘Agree’ or ‘Agree Strongly’
% Faculty % Students
How often, if ever, have you seen a student cheat during a test or exam at UAA?
Never Just once A few times Several times Many times
52
13
26
73
41
8
33
14
5
% of Students % of Faculty
How frequently do you think plagiarism on written assignments occurs at UAA?
Never Very Seldom Seldom Often Very Often
2
24
49
21
40
3
34
50
13
% of Students % of Faculty
How frequently do you think students inappropriately share work in group
assignments at UAA?
Never Very Seldom Seldom Often Very Often
2
14
36 35
14
15
4340
11
% of Students % of Faculty
How frequently do you think students cheat during tests or exams at UAA?
Never Very Seldom Seldom Often Very Often
5
3639
14
50
22
54
19
6
% of Students % of Faculty
Academically Dishonest Behavior at UAA
Self-Reported Frequency of Academically Dishonest Student Behaviors
Cheating on a test in any other way
Helping someone else cheat on a test
Working w/ others electronically when instructor asked for individual work
Receiving unpermitted help on an assignment
Getting Q/A from someone who has already taken test
Copying (by hand or in person) another student's homework
Paraphrasing or copying a few sentences from written source without citing
Paraphrasing or copying a few sentences from electronic source without footnoting
Working w/ others (in person) when instructor asked for individual work
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
7
10
11
11
15
12
15
18
15
6
7
12
13
11
17
16
18
23
% of Students Responding ‘Once’ and ‘More than Once’
Self-Reported Frequency of Academically Dishonest Student Behaviors
Fabricating or falsifying research data
Copying (electronically) another student's homework
Fabricating or falsifying a bibliography
Copying during a test without his or her knowledge
Copying another student's computer program
Fabricating or falsifying lab data
Copying from another student during a test with his or her knowledge
Using unpermitted handwritten crib notes during a test
Using a false or forged excuse to obtain an extension on a due date or exam
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
5
5
5
6
9
9
7
8
8
3
4
6
5
3
4
6
5
5
% of Students Responding ‘Once’ and ‘More than Once’
Self-Reported Frequency of Academically Dishonest Student Behaviors
Turning in paper from paper mill (written by another student)
Submitting a paper purchased/obtained from a Website
Using electronic/digital device as unauthorized aid during exam
Turning in work done by someone else
Using digital technology to get unpermitted help from someone during an exam
Using electronic crib notes during a test
Copying material, almost word for word, from any written source
Turning in paper copied, at least in part, from another student
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
% of Students Responding ‘Once’ and ‘More than Once’
3
3
2
2
2
1
Cheating in Online Courses
Collaborated on an online exam when not permitted
Used notes or books on a closed-book online exam
Received unauthorized help from someone on online exam
Looked up information on the Internet when not permitted
% of Faculty who have taught online course who have observed this type of cheating% of Students who have taken online course who admit to this type of cheating
Faculty and Student Perceptions of Current UAA Policies and Penalties
How would you rate the severity of penalties for cheating at UAA?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% of Students% of Faculty
How would you rate the average student’s understanding of University policies concerning
cheating?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% of Students% of Faculty
How would you rate the faculty’s understanding of these policies?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
% of Students% of Faculty
How would you rate student support of these policies?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
% of Students% of Faculty
How would you rate faculty support of these policies?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
% of Students% of Faculty
How would you rate the effectiveness of these policies?
Very Weak
Weak
Neither weak nor strong
Strong
Very strong
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
% of Students% of Faculty
Faculty and Student Reporting of Academically Dishonest Behavior
If you were convinced, even after discussion with the student, that a student had cheated on a major test or assignment in your course, what would be
your most likely reaction? (check all that apply)
Do nothing about the incident
Other
Lower student's grade
Fail the student for the course
Require student to retake test/redo assign
Reprimand or warn the student
Report student to Chair, Director, Dean
Report student to Dean of Students
Fail the student on the test or assignment
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1
8
12
17
26
36
41
46
63
% of Faculty
Why Faculty Ignore Cheating
Yes93%
No7%
Have you ever ignored a suspected incident of
cheating in one of your courses for any reason?
Not enough time
Other
Student will suffer
Lacked evidence/proof
6
7
7
8
8
8
34
If yes, which of the following factors influenced your deci-
sion?
Faculty Referral of Cheating for Investigation
Yes52%
No48%
Have you ever referred a case of suspected cheating
to your Chair, a Dean, or anyone else?
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Unsatisfied
Very unsatisfied
28
31
22
11
9
If yes, how satisfied were you with the way the case was handled?
What safeguards do faculty employ to reduce cheating in their courses?
None
Other
Use internet or software (turnitin.com)
Hand out different versions of exams
Remind students of UAA policies
Closely monitor exams
Discuss my views on academic integrity
Change exams regularly
Info in syllabus/assignments
4
23
27
39
56
60
67
69
76
% of Faculty Using this Safeguard
Student observation and reporting of academic dishonesty at UAA
Never
Very Seldom
Seldom
Often
Very Often
2
24
49
21
4
% who have seen a student cheat during a
test% of Students
Yes3%
No97%
% who have reported another student for aca-
demic dishonesty
Percent of students stating how likely it is that:
They would report an incident of cheating
The typical student would report an incident of cheating
A student would report a close friend
0 20 40 60 80100
36
25
81
41
58
15
19
15
3
5
3
1
% Very Unlikely % Unlikely % Likely % Very Likely
If you had committed an act of academic dishonesty in a course, and the following individuals knew about it,
how strongly would they react?
A close friend
A student you go around with
Your parents
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
23
15
6
30
36
6
25
31
24
23
18
64
% Not at all % Not Very Strongly% Fairly Strongly % Very Strongly
Where Students Learn About Academic Integrity Policies at UAA
Student knowledge about academic integrity policies at UAA
Yes91%
No9%
% who have been informed about academic integrity
policies at UAA
Teaching assistantsOther
Other studentsDeans or administrators
1st year orientationUAA website
Counselor or advisorStudent handbook
Faculty
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
How much have you learned about these policies from:
Little or nothing SomeA lot
UAA Faculty Survey on Academic Integrity
do not disc
uss
on assig
nments
in sylla
bus
start
of semeste
roth
er
not releva
nt
4%
42%
70% 67%
9% 3%
When do you discuss with students your policies
concerning:
plagiarism
do not disc
uss
on assig
nments
in sylla
bus
start
of semeste
roth
er
not releva
nt
6%
54%
33%38%
4%9%
When do you discuss with students your policies
concerning:
group work/collaboration
UAA Faculty Survey on Academic Integrity
do not disc
uss
on assig
nments
in sylla
bus
start
of semeste
roth
er
not releva
nt
6%
63%
47%36%
14% 11%
When do you discuss with students your policies
concerning:proper citation or referencing of sources
do not disc
uss
on assig
nments
in sylla
bus
start
of semeste
roth
er
not releva
nt
7%
64%
42%30%
15% 11%
When do you discuss with students your policies
concerning:proper citation or referencing of Internet sources