Ad Connect Snapshot
-
Upload
juxtconsult -
Category
Business
-
view
1.883 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ad Connect Snapshot
![Page 1: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A quarterly monitor of the most effective ads in a product category
JuxtConsult AdConnect Study
![Page 2: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The study tells you if your ad is generating sufficient ‘consumer mass’ for the brand in the category
‘Live-test’ based ratings of ads by category audience using 12 distinct parameters that determine ‘effectiveness’ of an ad
Measuring ‘Ad Effectiveness’ comprehensively Noticeability and memorability (recall) Appeal and likeability Relevance and persuasiveness Brand differentiation and brand preference building
Eventually measures the ‘consumer mass’ that the ad is generating is favor of the brand in the category (category mindshare)
Study Overview
![Page 3: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Methodology• ‘Live’ ratings of ads by category users and intended users in next 6
months
• Sample of 120-150 category respondents for each surveyed ad in the category
• Online survey conducted using a leading portal in India as well as Google search ads. Data made representative of the urban Indian population by using appropriate ‘demographic multipliers’
• Multipliers derived using authentic Govt. of India population data
• Findings and demographic profile of respondents are highly representative of current and intended urban users of the product category covering almost all SEC, age, income and town classes
![Page 4: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
All recall based answers collected ‘unprompted’ in blank text boxes
All category level ratings collected using a ‘5 point qualitative scale’ dropdown options
E.g. How much do you ‘identify’ with the ad?
Its just made for me
I somewhat relate to what is said in the ad
I can’t make out if the ad is meant for me or not
I don’t really relate to what is said in the ad
It is definitely not for me
Only the most recently run ads in the category are shown, and only to the category users/ intending users
Study Methodology
![Page 5: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Ad Connect Measurement Model
Was the ad noticed?
Was the ad understood?
Did the ad appeal?
Was the message relevant?
Did it help build brand preference?
The Measures
Recall
Message
comprehension
Message believability
Originality/Distinctiveness
Likeability
Identification
Message
relevanceBrand Differentiation
Brand Inclination
Brand Empathy
Impact on Brand Image
Brand Consideration
The Ad – Consumer Interaction Points
The Ad Effectiveness Criteria
Noticeability
Relatability
Connectivity
Relevance
Brand preference
©
© Copyright JuxtConsult
![Page 6: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Measuring & Rating Schema
Likeability
Originality
Audience Identification
Ad Appeal
Ad noticed and appeals
Ad Appeal Index
Message Connect
Ad is understood, relatable and convinces
Comprehensibility
Relevance
Persuasiveness / Believability
Ad Persuasion Index
Brand Impact
Ad creates brand preference
Brand Differentiation
Brand Inclination
Image Impact
Brand Empathy
Brand Preference
Brand Impact Index
©
© Copyright JuxtConsult
Ad MomentuxTotal ‘audience mass’ generated by the ad for the brand
TOM Ad Recall
Ad ConnectAd Connect Quotient
(adCQ)
Qualitative impact created by the ad on the audience
Qualitative impactof the ad
Quantitative impactof the ad
![Page 7: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Derived Measures
Message Connect
Brand Impact
Ad Appeal How much is the ad noticed and appeals
How much is the ad understood, related to and convinces
How much is the ad contributing in creating brand preference
Ad Appeal Index
Ad Persuasion Index
Brand Impact Index
Ad ConnectTM
Total impact created by the ad among the consumers (ad effectiveness)
Ad Connect Quotient
Ad MomentuxTM
Ad Momentum IndexConsumer mass generated by the ad for the brand (audience mindshare)
![Page 8: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Category Level Example
Soft Drinks
September - October 2007
![Page 9: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Ads Tested
Coca Cola Corporate Coke
Thums Up Mirinda 1
Pepsi
Fanta
![Page 10: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ads Tested
Mirinda 2 Limca Mountain Dew
Sprite Slice7 Up
![Page 11: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Top of Mind Ad Recall
Brand Ad Top of Mind Ad Recall
Pepsi 33%
Coca Cola 19%
Thums up 16%
Sprite 15%
Mirinda 5%
Fanta 5%
7up 5%
Mountain Dew 2%
Limca 1%
Slice 0.4%
How much is the ad recalled top of mind for the category
![Page 12: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Relative Effectiveness of the Ads
Brand Ad Ad Connect Quotient
(adCQ)Relative
Index
Pepsi 12.20 100
Thums up 12.24 99
Fanta 10.04 82
Mirinda 9.06 74
Slice 8.03 66
Coca Cola 7.90 65
Limca 7.86 64
Mountain Dew 7.30 60
Sprite 6.84 56
7up 6.43 53
Total effectiveness of the ads in connecting with the category consumers
![Page 13: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Current ‘Ad Momentum’ of the Ads
Total Audience ‘mindshare’ generated by the ad for the brand in the category
Brand Ad Ad Momentum(Audience
Mindshare)
Ad Momentum (Relative
Index)
Pepsi 41% 100
Thums up 20% 48
Coca Cola 15% 38
Sprite 10% 25
Fanta 5% 12
Mirinda 4% 11
7up 3% 7
Mountain Dew 2% 4
Limca 0.4% 1
Slice 0.4% 1
![Page 14: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ad Effectiveness Perceptual Map
-.3-.4
.3
.2
.1
0.0
-.1
-.2
Att
ribute
Brand
.3.2.10.0-.1-.2
Brand Impact
Message Connect
Ad Appeal
Thums up
SpriteSlice
Pepsi
Mountain Dew
Mirinda
Limca
Fanta
Coca Cola
7up
The nearer the brand is to an attribute, more strongly is its ad associated with that attribute as compared to other attributes.The closer it is to ‘0-0’ axis, the less it Is associated with any attribute at all
![Page 15: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Respondent Profile – Soft Drinks
October - November 2007
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 1,256)
Census 2001 Projected Actual Urban
Population
Gender Male 69% 52%
Female 31% 48%
Age Distribution Below 13 years Not included in study NA
13-18 years 9% 16%
19-24 years 30% 17%
25-35 years 38% 27%
36-45 years 15% 18%
46-55 years 6% 11%
Above 55 years 2% 11%
City Type Up to 1 Lakh 33% 31%
(Population Size) 1-5 Lakhs 20% 27%
5-30 Lakhs 24% 25%
Above 30 Lakhs 23% 17%
Region-wise Distribution
North 22% 24%
East 8% 15%
South 30% 29%
West 41% 32%
![Page 16: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Respondent Profile – Soft Drinks
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 1,256)
Census 2001 Projected
Actual Urban Population
Socio-economic Classification
SEC - A 20% 9%
SEC - B 28% 18%
SEC - C 28% 25%
SEC - D 15% 26%
SEC - E 9% 22%
Economic Status in the Family
Chief wage earner 43%
Not the chief wage earner 57%
Monthly Household Income Up to Rs. 10,000 56%
Rs. 10,000 – Rs. 30,000 29%
Rs. 30,000 – Rs. 50,000 6%
Above Rs. 50,000 9%
Most Expensive Vehicle in the HH
4-wheeler 18%
2-wheeler 32%
Bi-cycle / others 13%
Don't own any vehicle 36%
October - November 2007
![Page 17: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Category Level Example
Candy Mouth Fresheners
September - October 2007
![Page 18: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Ads Tested
Chlormint Mentos Center Fresh Wrigley’s Orbit
Happydent WhiteHappydent Protex Chill Pillz Polo
Parle XhaleMinto Blue Center Shook
![Page 19: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Top of Mind Ad Recall
Brand Ad Top of Mind Ad Recall
Chlormint 25%
Orbit 18%
Minto Fresh 16%
Mentos 11%
Center Fresh 9%
Happydent White 9%
Pass Pass 7%
Polo 4%
Halls 1%
How much is the ad recalled top of mind for the category
![Page 20: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Relative Effectiveness of the Ads
Brand Ad Ad Connect Quotient
(adCQ)Relative
Index
Center Fresh 3.85 100
Chlormint 3.82 99
Minto Fresh 3.70 96
Mentos 3.22 84
Orbit 3.13 81
Happydent White 1.55 40
Polo 0.94 24
Minto Blue 0.03 1
Happydent Protex 0.02 1
Total effectiveness of the ads in connecting with the category consumers
![Page 21: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Current ‘Ad Momentum’ of the Ads
Total Audience ‘mindshare’ generated by the ad for the brand in the category
Brand Ad Ad Momentum(Audience
Mindshare)
Ad Momentum (Relative
Index)
Chlormint 33% 100
Minto Fresh 21% 64
Orbit 15% 47
Mentos 13% 39
Center Fresh 13% 38
Happydent White 4% 13
Polo 1% 4
Happydent Protex 0% 0
Minto Blue 0% 0
![Page 22: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Brand AdTop of Mind
Ad RecallAd Connect (adCQ)
Relative Index
Ad Momentum(Audience
Mindshare)
Chlormint 25% 99 33%
Orbit 18% 81 15%
Minto Fresh 16% 96 21%
Mentos 11% 84 13%
Center Fresh 9% 100 13%
Happydent White 9% 40 4%
Pass Pass 7% - -
Polo 4% 24 1%
Halls 0.8% - -
Minto Blue 0.1% 1 0%
Happydent Protex 0.1% 1 0%
Ad Momentum Summary
* Lotte Chill Pillz and Parle Xhale got zero top of mind brand recall, so could not be included in ad momentum calculations
Current Audience Mindshare
![Page 23: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Ad Effectiveness Perceptual Map
.4.3.2.1-.0-.1-.2-.3
.4
.3
.2
.1
0.0
-.1
-.2
Att
ribute
Brand
Brand Impact
Ad Appeal
Polo Mint
Happydent White
Mentos
Orbit
Minto Fresh
Chlormint
Minto Blue Happydent Protex
Center Fresh
Message Connect
The nearer the brand is to an attribute, more strongly is its ad associated with that attribute as compared to other attributes.The closer it is to ‘0-0’ axis, the less it Is associated with any attribute at all
![Page 24: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
September - October 2007
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 948)
Census 2001 Projected Actual Urban
Population
Gender Male 65% 52%
Female 35% 48%
Age Distribution Below 13 years Not included in study NA
13-18 years 13% 16%
19-24 years 27% 17%
25-35 years 38% 27%
36-45 years 16% 18%
46-55 years 4% 11%
Above 55 years 2% 11%
City Type Up to 1 Lakh 27% 31%
(Population Size) 1-5 Lakhs 15% 27%
5-30 Lakhs 23% 25%
Above 30 Lakhs 35% 17%
Region-wise Distribution
North 30% 24%
East 8% 15%
South 29% 29%
West 33% 32%
Respondent Profile – Candy Mouth Fresheners
* Representative of 22 million urban current and intended users of candy mouth fresheners
![Page 25: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Respondent Profile – Candy Mouth Fresheners
September - October 2007
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 948)
Census 2001 Projected
Actual Urban Population
Socio-economic Classification
SEC - A 16% 9%
SEC - B 23% 18%
SEC - C 44% 25%
SEC - D 8% 26%
SEC - E 9% 22%
Economic Status in the Family
Chief wage earner 28%
Not the chief wage earner 72%
Monthly Household Income Up to Rs. 10,000 54%
Rs. 10,000 – Rs. 30,000 38%
Rs. 30,000 – Rs. 50,000 3%
Above Rs. 50,000 5%
Most Expensive Vehicle in the HH
4-wheeler 13%
2-wheeler 42%
Bi-cycle / others 15%
Don't own any vehicle 30%
![Page 26: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
A quarterly monitor of the most effective ads in a product category
Deodorants
September - October 2007
![Page 27: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Ads Tested
Axe Rexona Fa Exotic
Set Wet Zatak Spinz SalsaNivea Aqua
![Page 28: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Top of Mind Ad Recall
Brand AdTop of Mind Ad
Recall
Rexona 36%
Axe 30%
Fa 11%
Set Wet Zatak 9%
Park Avenue 4%
Denim 3%
Nivea Aqua 2%
Adidas 1%
Spinz Salsa 1%
Others 3%
How much is the ad recalled top of mind for the category
![Page 29: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Relative Effectiveness of the Ads
Brand Ad
Ad Connect Quotient
(adCQ)Relative
Index
Rexona 3.57 100
Axe 3.53 99
Fa 1.40 39
Set Wet Zatak 1.05 29
Nivea Aqua 0.18 5
Spinz Salsa 0.13 4
Total effectiveness of the ads in connecting with the category consumers
![Page 30: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Current ‘Ad Momentum’ of the Ads
Total Audience ‘mindshare’ generated by the ad for the brand in the category
Brand Ad
Ad Momentum(Audience
Mindshare)
Ad Momentum (Relative
Index)
Rexona 49% 100
Axe 41% 84
Fa 6% 12
Set Wet Zatak 4% 7
Nivea Aqua 0% 0
Spinz Salsa 0% 0
![Page 31: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Brand AdTop of Mind
Ad RecallAd Connect (adCQ)
Relative Index
Ad Momentum(Audience
Mindshare)
Rexona 36% 100 49%
Axe 30% 99 41%
Fa 11% 39 6%
Set Wet Zatak 9% 29 4%
Park Avenue 4% - -
Denim 3% - -
Nivea Aqua 2% 5 0%
Adidas 1% - -
Spinz Salsa 1% 4 0%
Others 3% - -
Ad Momentum SummaryCurrent Audience Mindshare
![Page 32: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Ad Effectiveness Perceptual Map
.2.1-.0-.1-.2-.3
.3
.2
.1
0.0
-.1
Att
ribute
Brand
Brand Impact
Message Connect
Ad Appeal
Spinz Salsa
Nivea Aqua
Zatak
Fa
Axe
Rexona
The nearer the brand is to an attribute, more strongly is its ad associated with that attribute as compared to other attributes.The closer it is to ‘0-0’ axis, the less it Is associated with any attribute at all
![Page 33: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Respondent Profile – Deodorants
September - October 2007
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 957)
Census 2001 Projected Actual Urban
Population
Gender Male 50% 52%
Female 50% 48%
Age Distribution Below 13 years Not included in study NA
13-18 years 13% 16%
19-24 years 29% 17%
25-35 years 38% 27%
36-45 years 11% 18%
46-55 years 5% 11%
Above 55 years 4% 11%
City Type Up to 1 Lakh 30% 31%
(Population Size) 1-5 Lakhs 16% 27%
5-30 Lakhs 28% 25%
Above 30 Lakhs 26% 17%
Region-wise Distribution
North 19% 24%
East 16% 15%
South 23% 29%
West 42% 32%
![Page 34: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Respondent Profile – Deodorants
September - October 2007
Demographic Attributes Ad Momentux Study Respondent
Profile(Sample – 957)
Census 2001 Projected
Actual Urban Population
Socio-economic Classification
SEC - A 19% 9%
SEC - B 28% 18%
SEC - C 32% 25%
SEC - D 10% 26%
SEC - E 12% 22%
Economic Status in the Family
Chief wage earner 36%
Not the chief wage earner 64%
Monthly Household Income Up to Rs. 10,000 49%
Rs. 10,000 – Rs. 30,000 36%
Rs. 30,000 – Rs. 50,000 7%
Above Rs. 50,000 8%
Most Expensive Vehicle in the HH
4-wheeler 17%
2-wheeler 42%
Bi-cycle / others 3%
Don't own any vehicle 38%
![Page 35: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
1. Effectiveness ratings# of the mainline brand ads in the category by current / intended users (minimum 150 live test responses per brand reported)
2. ‘Ad momentum’ with which the ads are building ‘consumer mass’ for their respective brands in the category
3. Most recalled ads for the category (top of mind and spontaneous)
4. Sources media of TOM recalls (for each brand reported)
5. Level of ‘identification’ of ad with the brand (for each brand reported)
6. Level of ‘identification’ of ad slogan with the brand (for each brand reported)
7. Rating of each ad on ‘likeability’, with identification of the ad ‘elements’ leading to the likeness
8. Rating of each ad on key ad measurement attributes:
• Ad Appeal
• Message Connect
• Brand Impact
9. Rating of each reported ad in the category on the balance 10 individual parameters (originality, audience identification, message comprehension, message relevance, persuasiveness, brand differentiation, brand impression, brand image, brand empathy and brand preference)
10. Rating of ad’s effectiveness in using the celebrity/brand ambassador if used
11. Media preferences of the category users/intended users (TV channels, Newspapers, Magazines, Radio channels, Generic websites, Emailing websites, News websites)
12. All ratings and preferences reported by key demographic segments wherever possible* (gender, age, SEC, occupation, marital status, town class, region, income class, vehicle ownership)
# all category level ratings are provided by respondents on a 5 point qualitative scale, * depending on the sufficiency of sample size of relevant respondents
Ad ConnectTM Report Content
![Page 36: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
JuxtConsult Ad Connect Study
Pricing of Reports
* 12.36% service tax extra
Report One Time Report* Annual Subscription*
Nos. Amount (Rs.) Nos. Amount (Rs.)
Ad ConnectTM Category Level Report 1 150,000 4 480,000
• Payment Terms : 50% advance
50% before the delivery of third quarterly report
• Delivery Timeline : Quarterly Reports – By 15th of the relevant month after the quarter
• Report Delivery Format : PDF
![Page 37: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Contact Details
• Address : 7, Kehar Singh Estate, 1st Floor, Westend
Marg, Lane 2, Said-ul-Ajaib, New Delhi – 110030
• Telephone : +91-11-29535098, +91-9811256502
• Contact Person : Sanjay Tiwari
• Email : [email protected]
• Website : www.juxtconsult.com
![Page 38: Ad Connect Snapshot](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070304/54b9151f4a7959b66d8b4584/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Thank You!