Actual Regulatory Cost of Property Development on Selected Municipalities in South Africa
-
Upload
maia-dorsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
21 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Actual Regulatory Cost of Property Development on Selected Municipalities in South Africa
1
Actual Regulatory Cost of Property Development on Selected Municipalities in South Africa
Consultative Workshop with Municipalities
30 April 2013
Southern Sun Hotel, OR Tambo Airport
2
Presentation Outline1. Project Brief
2. Study Areas
3. Limitations of the Study
4. Project Approach and Methodology
5. Cost Comparison : Findings
6. Municipal Challenges and Constraints
7. Property Developer Surveys
8. Summary of the Study
9. Recommendations
10. Way Forward
3
Project Brief
• To comparatively investigate the municipal development cost of property-related projects in select municipalities in which SAPOA members are most active.
• To determine both the costs of doing property-related investment; as well as to assess possible limitations posed by municipalities that impact development progress and feasibility.
4
Sampling/Municipal Selection
• 18 Municipalities was selected (please see map on next slide).
• Objective to study two representative municipalities for each province ideally the largest cities.
• Mandate from GGDA to include all Gauteng Metro’s.• Selection is regarded as a pilot project for a future larger
sample which will be included.• Wish list of larger sample for future analysis included in
the report.• Budget and capacity limitations.
5
Sampling/Municipal Selection
6
Overall Methodology
A. Municipal Cost Assessment
Findings
Observations Recommendations
B. Municipal Capacity Surveys
C. Developer Experience Surveys
• Study comprised of three components:A. Municipal Cost AssessmentB. Municipal Capacity SurveysC. Developer Surveys
7
A. Municipal Service Cost1. Finalise Reference Framework
2. Review Rates and Tax Policies of individual municipalities
3. Identify information gaps and uncertainties
4. Consult Municipal Departments to fill data/information gaps and ensure correct interpretation of calculation
methods
5. Data capture, information review and critical analysis
6. Investigate outliers
8. Comparative Analysis and Results
7. Consult with Municipalities to analyse and understand outliers
a) Identify cost indicators to be studied
b) Develop appropriate & standardised scenarios
Main Respondent GroupsTown planning departmentsBudget departmentCall centreEngineering departments
8
Development ScenariosType of Development Description of the Development
Medium Density Residential Developments
20 unit townhouse sectional title duplex (100m² each) on a 0.8ha site
Retail Centre Regional Retail Centre (GLA of 40 000m²) on a 10ha site
Commercial Office 8 floor high-rise office tower block (1 000m² per floor) on a 3200m² site
Industrial Large industrial factory (10 000m²) on a 2.5ha site
1. Environmental Impact Assessment Fees 9. Sewerage Consumption Charges2. Zoning and Re-Zoning Fees 10. Refuse Consumption Charges3. Township Establishment Fees 11. Electricity Consumption Charges4. Subdivision Fees 12. Vacant Land Rates5. Building Plan Fees 13. Property Rates6. Sewerage Connection Fees 14. Property Rebates7. Electricity Connection Fees 15. Surcharges8. Water Consumption Charges
Development Cost Components
9
B. Municipal Capacity Surveys1. Finalise Reference Framework
2. Telephonic and questionnaire email interviews with target sample
3. Identify information gaps and limitations
4. Second round interviews to fill data/information gaps and ensure
accurate interpretation of responses
5. Relate responses to cost calculations
6. Comparative Analysis and Results
Main Respondent GroupsHead EngineersHead Town Planners
*or respondents designated by department heads.
a) Develop focussed questionnaires
b) Identify representative departments and contact person for each Municipality
10
C. Developer Surveys1. Finalise Reference Framework
2. Questionnaire Submission to Database (First Round)
3. Review first round responses
4. Second round submission to increase
responses
5. Relate responses to cost calculations
6. Highlight most important responses
7. Comparative Analysis and Results
a) Develop focussed questionnaires b) Develop online survey platform
Main Respondent GroupsProperty OwnersDevelopersLease BrokersProperty Management Companies
11
Study Limitations1. Insufficient financial capacity and timeframe to cover all municipalities in South Africa
2. Different municipal structures and thus approach for each municipality had to be adjusted.
3. Standardisation limitations due to many influential factors as well as complicated and unique nature of individual developments
4. Respondents were unable to provide rationale for budgets as respondents were officials responsible for implementation and not necessarily the decision-makers.
5. Vast number of municipalities and range of components to compare led to a difficulty in determining “affordable” and “expensive”
6. Municipalities of various sizes (Metros and LM) are not all identically comparable
12
Summary: Observations• The municipal service costs of municipalities vary extensively• Variations are mainly due to different calculation techniques• Costs for indicators such as connection fees can not be generalised as it is
reliant on unknown variables (e.g. distance to existing connections, availability of bulk services).
• Each municipality in their local context face their own unique challenges and problems
• Frequently highlighted challenge include: – capacity and financial resources – practical experience – backlog on infrastructure maintenance– developers taking advantage of system limitations
• Negative perceptions towards municipal performance is currently evident from the majority of developers
13
Zoning & Re-zoning tariffs
14
Zoning & Re-zoning tariffs
15
Zoning & Re-zoning tariffs
16
Rebated Property RatesResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 445840 13,653.500 1,029.864 5363875
Tshwane 879660 18,956.000 1,429.824 7447000
Ekurhuleni 740000 10,430.000 786720 5142500
Cape Town 606200 8,486.800 640147 3334100
Msunduzi 1110000 14,140.000 1,066.560 5555000
Nelson Mandela Bay 744100 10,417.400 785770 5115825
Buffalo City 735000 12,862.500 970200 5053125
Mangaung 779288 27,034.000 2,039.136 10620500
Ethekwini 912903 14,504.000 1,094.016 7353500
17
Rebated Property RatesResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Mogale City 633946 14798000 1116192 5813500
Emfuleni 594108 11900000 897600 5830000
George 401054 4214700 317909 1655775
Mbombela 519824 9349816 774808
Emalahleni 576087 7321125 552222 2876156
Polokwane 475929 4305000 389664 1691250
Sol Plaatjie 911863 19159000 1445136 10661750
Khara Hais 1261832 13255200 999821 5207400
Rustenburg 529947 12880000 971520 5197500
18
Property Rates
Residential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 557300 13653500 1029864 5363875
Tshwane 1354000 18956000 1429824 7447000
Ekurhuleni 740000 10430000 786720 5142500
Cape Town 606200 8486800 640147 3334100
Msunduzi 1110000 14140000 1066560 5555000
Nelson Mandela Bay 744100 10417400 785770 5115825
Buffalo City 735000 12862500 970200 5053125
Mangaung 779600 27034000 2039136 10620500
Ethekwini 914000 14504000 1094016 7353500
19
Property Rates
Residential Retail Commercial Industrial
Mogale City 1057000 14798000 1116192 5813500
Emfuleni 850000 11900000 897600 5830000
George 501400 4214700 317909 1655775
Mbombela 743200 13005300 980971
Emalahleni 768500 9761500 736296 3834875
Polokwane 476000 5740000 432960 2255000
Sol Plaatjie 912000 19159000 1445136 10661750
Khara Hais 1262400 13255200 999821 5207400
Rustenburg 530000 12880000 971520 5197500
20
Subdivision
Johannesb
urg
Tshwan
e
Ekurhulen
i
Cape T
own
Msunduzi
Nelson M
andela
Bay
Buffalo City
Manga
ung
Ethek
wini0
100020003000400050006000700080009000
790 5541205
36592394 2880
3590
1783
8009
Residential
Residential
21
Building FeesResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 25000 405000 85000 105000
Tshwane 22440 440440 88440 110440
Ekurhuleni 22600 201390 66675 80115
Cape Town 55232 1104640 220928 208016
Msunduzi 19345 109769 32224 40240
Nelson Mandela Bay 52417 120840 120840 120840
Buffalo City 53330 945000 202000 177600
Mangaung 150000 4760000 952000 1190000
Ethekwini 29150 397750 87350 106750
22
Building Fees
Residential Retail Commercial Industrial
Mogale City 24200 575200 115040 143800
Emfuleni 5581 187565 39021 48305
George 88920 1007076 204516 254676
Mbombela 6250 120250 24250 30250
Emalahleni 32262 64321 120498 149910
Polokwane 41040 820800 164160 205200
Sol Plaatjie 25080 501600 100320 125400
Khara Hais 8230 110830 24430 29830
Rustenburg
23
Township establishmentResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 4209 4209 4209 4209
Tshwane 7267 16350 11770 11770
Ekurhuleni 5375 5375 5375 5375Cape Town n/a n/a n/a n/aMsunduzi n/a n/a n/a n/aNelson Mandela Bay 2280 2280 2280 2280
Buffalo City n/a n/a n/a n/a
Mangaung 340 2000000 64000 42500
Ethekwini 342 4212 4212 4212
24
Township establishment
Residential Retail Commercial IndustrialMogale City 6676 6676 6676 6676Emfuleni 5295 5295 5295 5295George n/a n/a n/a n/aMbombela 9985 9985 9985 9985Emalahleni 4218 4218 4218 4218Polokwane 6794 6794 6794 6794Sol Plaatjie n/a n/a n/a n/aKhara Hais 2060 1030 1030 1030Rustenburg 6050 6050 6050 6050
25
Water connectionResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 34284 35482 35482 35482
Tshwane 16110 23610 23610 23610
Ekurhuleni 37348 45906 45906 45906
Cape Town 5580 6962 6962 6962
Msunduzi 19597 27605 27605 27605
Nelson Mandela Bay 30000 35000 35000 35000
Buffalo City 28482 38664 38664 73045
Mangaung quotation quotation quotation quotation
Ethekwini quotation quotation quotation quotation
26
Water connectionResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Mogale City quotation quotation quotation quotation
Emfuleni 28050 30200 30200 30200
George 13584 0quotation quotation
Mbombela 28000 34000 34000 34000
Emalahleni 2537 2537 2537 2537
Polokwane 8948quotation quotation quotation
Sol Plaatjie
Khara Hais 14100 17800 17800 17800
Rustenburg 28280 27131 27131 27131
27
Vacant Land
Residential Retail Commercial IndustrialJohannesburg 445840 5573000 445840 557300Tshwane 1202800 15035000 1202800 1503500Ekurhuleni 596000 7450000 596000 745000Cape Town 242480 3031000 242480 303100Msunduzi 404000 5050000 404000 505000Nelson Mandela Bay 446460 5580750 446460 558075Buffalo City 441000 5512500 441000 551250Mangaung 155920 1949000 155920 194900Ethekwini 875200 10940000 875200 1094000
28
Vacant LandResidential Retail Commercial Industrial
Mogale City 845600 10570000 845600 1057000
Emfuleni 340000 6375000 510000 742500
George 100280 1253500 100280 125350
Mbombela 445900 5573750 445900 557375
Emalahleni 278900 3486250 278900 348625
Polokwane 455820 2050000 164000 205000
Sol Plaatjie 39880 747725 59818 184435
Khara Hais 63120 789000 63120 78900
Rustenburg 150000 1875000 150000 187500
29
Electricity Consumption
Residential Retail Commercial Industrial
Johannesburg 1.21 0.56 0.8 0.8
Tshwane 1.03 0.32 0.36 0.36
Ekurhuleni 1.09 0.95 0.99 0.99Cape Town 1.4 0.55 0.54 0.54
Msunduzi 0.59 0.65 0.59 0.59
Nelson Mandela Bay 1.07 0.62 0.65 0.65
Buffalo City 0.54 0.9 0.97 0.97
Mangaung 0.94 0.87 0.87 0.87
Ethekwini 0.75 0.9 0.9 0.51
30
Electricity Consumption
Residential Retail Commercial IndustrialJohannesburg 1.21 0.56 0.8 0.8Tshwane 1.03 0.32 0.36 0.36Ekurhuleni 1.09 0.95 0.99 0.99Cape Town 1.4 0.55 0.54 0.54Msunduzi 0.59 0.65 0.59 0.59Nelson Mandela Bay 1.07 0.62 0.65 0.65Buffalo City 0.54 0.9 0.97 0.97Mangaung 0.94 0.87 0.87 0.87Ethekwini 0.75 0.9 0.9 0.51
31
Recommendations
• Standardised and transparent costing and calculation approaches.
• Customer care and liaison to disseminate information and communicate w.r.t. backlogs and system delays.
• Development consulting services provided in-house by municipalities as a value added development promoting service and additional income generator for the municipality.
• Mutual understanding of both parties (Municipality and Developers) of the processes its limitations, time constraints and costs incurred.
• Utilisation of information technology to streamline and track development processes
32
Way Forward
1. A detailed manual outlining the standardised approach to tariff setting to be investigated and developed
2. Create an Index on development costs to be available to the public
3. Broaden the study areas to a more representative national sample
4. The potential the development and introduction of an Information Technology administrative system
5. Develop an online “calculator” tool to calculate specific costs
To ensure the continued relevance of the research, it is suggested the cost analysis be reviewed annually due to new tariff policies released by municipalities in July of every year.