activity based method - Rousseau_presentation

14
7/13/2010 1 Atlanta Travel Forecasting Methods: Traditional Trip-Based & Activity-Based Model TMIP Webinar, July 14, 2010 Guy Rousseau, Modeling Manager, Atlanta Regional Commission Guy Rousseau, Modeling Manager, Atlanta Regional Commission Travel Demand Forecasting @ ARC Travel Demand Forecasting @ ARC Where Do We Start? Where Do We Start? E i ti /Pl d L dU & Travel Behavior Existing/Planned Transportation System Land Use & Socio-Economic Characteristics The Travel Demand Model Set (The “Black Box”)

description

activity based method - Rousseau_presentation

Transcript of activity based method - Rousseau_presentation

  • 7/13/2010

    1

    Atlanta Travel Forecasting Methods:

    Traditional Trip-Based&

    Activity-Based Model

    TMIP Webinar, July 14, 2010

    Guy Rousseau, Modeling Manager, Atlanta Regional CommissionGuy Rousseau, Modeling Manager, Atlanta Regional Commission

    , y ,

    Travel Demand Forecasting @ ARCTravel Demand Forecasting @ ARCWhere Do We Start?Where Do We Start?

    E i ti /Pl d

    L d U &

    TravelBehavior

    Existing/PlannedTransportation

    System

    Land Use &Socio-EconomicCharacteristics

    The TravelDemand

    Model Set

    (The Black Box)

  • 7/13/2010

    2

    ARCs Trip Generation

    6 Trip Purposes:

    Home-Based Work Home-Based Shopping Home-Based Grade School

    Home Based University Home-Based University Home-Based Other Non-Home Based

    ARCs Trip Production

    IS NOT Cross-Classification, its Logit Why? Allows more independent variables:

    Household size (1, 2, 3, 4+) Household income (

  • 7/13/2010

    3

    ARCs Trip Attraction

    Developed from Household Travel Survey & W k l E t bli h t S& Workplace Establishment Survey

    Features an Attraction Share Model based on 4 market segments: Households without cars Households with cars < workersHouseholds with cars < workers Low income hshlds with # cars >= # workers High income hshlds with # cars >= # workers

    ARCs Trip Distribution

    Still using Gravity Model, but looking into D ti ti Ch iDestination Choice

    Makes use of Topographic Penalty to compensate for area bias created by a river crossing

    The topo penalty is a lump sum of time in The topo penalty is a lump sum of time in minutes (2 to 3) added to the composite time of interzonal times for all zone pairs on opposite sides of the river

  • 7/13/2010

    4

    ARCs Mode Choice Fully Nested Logit Structure

    ARCs Air Passenger Model Mode Choice Structure

    Non-residents

    Non Auto

    Dropped Off Rental Car

    Transit Taxi

    Residents

    Non Auto

    Transit TaxiDrive Self Dropped Off

    Private Auto

  • 7/13/2010

    5

    ARC Commercial Vehicle & Truck Modelbased on

    FHWA 13-BinVehicle Classification

    1: 2/3 Wheels 2: Automobiles 3: 2 Axle/4 TireTrucks

    4: Buses

    5: 2 Axle/6 TireTrucks

    6: 3 Axle Single Unit Trucks

    7: 4+ Axle Single Unit Trucks

    8: 4 or Less Axles Single Trailer Trucks

    9: 5 Axles Single Trailer Trucks

    10: 6 or More Axles Single Trailer Trucks

    11: 5 or Less Axles Multiple Trailer Trucks

    12: 6 Axles Multiple Trailer Trucks

    13: 7 or More AxlesMultiple Trailer Trucks

    91 External Stations (2024 + 91 = 2115 total taz)

  • 7/13/2010

    6

    Atlanta Traffic Distribution By Hour

    6 53%6.71%

    7.33%

    7.82%

    6.69%7.00%

    8.00%

    9.00%

    4.61%

    6.53%

    5.83%

    4.89%4.75%5.09%

    5.60%6.01%

    5.12%

    4.04%

    3.40%

    2.60%

    5.49%

    3.00%

    4.00%

    5.00%

    6.00%

    Perc

    enta

    ge o

    f Tra

    ffic

    2000 Percent

    1999 Percent

    2 Year Average

    1.14%

    0.71%0.51%

    0.76%

    1.95%

    60%

    1.89%

    0.54%0.00%

    1.00%

    2.00%

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

    Hours in a Day

  • 7/13/2010

    7

    TheThe 44--StepStep ProcessProcessARC Travel Demand ForecastingARC Travel Demand Forecasting

    Land Use, Population & Employment

    Traffic Analysis

    Zones (TAZ's)

    Trip Generation

    Land Use Models

    Trip Distribution

    Mode and Path Choice

    TransitAssignments

    Modal Trip Tables

    Travel Pattern Surveys

    Auto OccupancyP/A to O/D

    Transportation Facilities &

    Performance

    Highway and Transit

    NetworksSkim Trees HighwayAssignments

    Vehicle Emission Estimates

    Speeds in = Speeds Out

    ?

    No Yes

    Demand

    Scenario 1

    Demand

    Scenario 1a

    ARC Model Applications: Using Radar Graphs to Visualize Performance Measures

    Mode Share

    Congestion

    AccessibilityMode Share

    Congestion

    Accessibility

    Scenario 2 Scenario 2bDemand

    Mode Share

    Congestion

    Accessibility

    Demand

    Mode Share

    Congestion

    Accessibility

  • 7/13/2010

    8

    ARCs Activity-Based Model Provides results similar to 4-step trip

    based modelOk th h b th ith ABM? Ok, so then why bother with an ABM?

    Because ARCs ABM provides additional details, more info about travel patterns & market segments

    ABM allows to answer questions the 4-ABM allows to answer questions the 4step model is not capable to provide

    For internal use only, not for official purposes, hence dual/parallel track of models

    ARC Activity-Based Modeling System

    Based on the CT-RAMP1 family of ABMs developed in New York, NY, Columbus OH (MORPC) and others

    - Explicit intra-household interactions - Continuous temporal dimension (Hourly time periods)- Integration of location, time-of-day, and mode choice models- Java-based package for AB model implementation

    Implemented with the existing Cube-based networks, GUI and ancillary models (external model, truck model, assignments, etc)

    1Coordinated Travel-Regional Activity-Based Modeling Platform

    Households: 1.7 million in 2005, 2.7 million in 2030

    Model development parallel effort with MTC

  • 7/13/2010

    9

    Synthesized Population: Person Age Share

    Age 65-79

    Age 80+ 2030

    2005

    Age 12-15

    Age 16-17

    Age 18-24

    Age 25-34

    Age 35-49

    Age 50-64

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

    Age 0-5

    Age 6-11

    Share

    Trip-Based Model Mode Share Compared to ABM Mode Share

    80%

    90%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    HBW

    HBO

    NHB

    0%

    10%

    20%

    WLKL WLKP DRVL DRVP SOV HOV WLKL WLKP DRVL DRVP SOV HOV

    Trip-Based Model Activity-Based Model

  • 7/13/2010

    10

    Line Boardings: Trip Based Model Versus ABM

    AM SOV Free:Trip Length Frequency Distributions

    400000

    450000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    300000

    350000

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    TBM

    ABM

    0

    50000

    100000

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51Distance

  • 7/13/2010

    11

    VMT by Time Period

    70,000,000

    80,000,000

    30,000,000

    40,000,000

    50,000,000

    60,000,000

    VMT

    Trip Concept3

    ABM Concept 3

    0

    10,000,000

    20,000,000

    AM MD PM NT

    ARCs ABM Year 2005 Volume/Count Scatterplot

  • 7/13/2010

    12

    What Sort of Performance Measures & Visuals are Possible with an Activity-Based Model?

    ABM results in a complete activity diary for all p y yARC residents

    A wealth of activity/travel results

    Just about any custom report/query/visual is iblnow possible

    Performance Measures also available by Age, Gender & Household Types

    Mean Delay, Peak Period Travel

  • 7/13/2010

    13

    Travelers By Age

    Persons Not At Home By TAZ and Hour

  • 7/13/2010

    14

    Persons By TAZ and Hour

    Questions / Comments

    Guy Rousseau (404 463-3274) [email protected] @ g

    Atlanta Regional Commission40 Courtland Street, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30303www.atlantaregional.comg

    Acknowledgements: PBS&J, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff, John Bowman, Mark Bradley, Bill Allen