ACleanElectricity Standard(CES) forAlberta · PresentaonPurpose •...

24
A Clean Electricity Standard (CES) for Alberta May 21, 2013 Version 1.3 Paula McGarrigle Solas Energy ConsulBng Inc. Presented to the Pembina Thought Leaders Forum

Transcript of ACleanElectricity Standard(CES) forAlberta · PresentaonPurpose •...

                                                                                   

A  Clean  Electricity    Standard  (CES)    for  Alberta  

 May  21,  2013  

Version  1.3    

Paula  McGarrigle  Solas  Energy  ConsulBng  Inc.  

 Presented  to  the  Pembina  Thought  Leaders  Forum  

PresentaBon  Purpose  

•  The  case  for  a  Clean  Electricity  Standard  – Provide  informa7on  – Answer  ques7ons  – Receive  feedback  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 2  

Agenda  

•  Part  I  – Ra7onale  – The  Clean  Electricity  Standard  

•  What  is  it?  •  Why  is  it  needed?  

•  Part  II  – Opera7onalizing  the  Clean  Electricity  Standard  

•  How  is  it  implemented?  •  Who  does  it  affect?  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 3  

What  is  Clean  Electricity?  •  Clean  Electricity  refers  to  

the  greenhouse  gas  (GHG)  intensity  of  the  electricity.  –  Measured  in  Tonnes  

CO2equivalent/MWh  

•  Mul7ple  technologies  can  be  considered  clean  electricity.  –  Emissions  intensity  compared  to  

a  standard.    

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 4  

Non  GHG  emiNng  electricity  

Solar  

Geothermal  

Hydro,  large,  small,  run-­‐of-­‐river  

Wind  

Nuclear  

Lower  GHG  emiNng  electricity  

Biomass  

Fuel  Cells  

Cogenera7on  

Combined  Cycle  Gas  Turbine  

Coal  with  CCS  

Is  Clean  Electricity  More  Expensive?  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 5  

$55#

$84#$92#

$114#

$157#$163#

$172#

$44#

$68#$74#

$92#

$127#$132#

$139#

$0#

$20#

$40#

$60#

$80#

$100#

$120#

$140#

$160#

$180#

$200#

Cogen# Wind# Coal# CCGT# SCGT# Coal#with#CCS# Hydro#

Levelized

#Cost#($/MWh)#

Levelized#Cost#

First#Year#Cost#of#Power#

Alberta  WindVision  Technical  Overview  Report  –  Solas  Energy  Consul7ng  Inc.  2013  

Alberta  based  genera7on  levelized  cost  for  new  genera7on.    Transmission  costs  not  included.  Year  2016  

Alberta’s  Electricity  GHG  Emissions  have  reduced  since  2000  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 6  Reference  Na7onal  Inventory  Report  2013  

0"

0.1"

0.2"

0.3"

0.4"

0.5"

0.6"

0.7"

0.8"

0.9"

1"

0"

10,000"

20,000"

30,000"

40,000"

50,000"

60,000"

70,000"

1985% 1990% 1995% 2000% 2005% 2010% 2015% GHG#Intensity

#T#GHG

/kWh#electricity

#Ge

nerated#

Electricity

#Sector#E

mission

s#(kT#CO2#

Equivalent)#

YEAR#

Electricity#Sector#Emissions#and#Emissions#Intensity#

Alberta's#Electricity#Emissions#Alberta's#Electricity#GHG#Intensity#

Ref:  Na(onal  Inventory  Report  2013  

0" 21" 0" 0" 1" 1" 0" 11"84"

2"75"

130" 110" 143"

0"66"

217"

88"

225"

0" 22" 22" 22" 22" 23" 23" 34"

118" 120"

196"

325"

435"

577" 577"

643"

860"

948"

1173"

1993$ 1994$ 1995$ 1996$ 1997$ 1998$ 1999$ 2000$ 2001$ 2002$ 2003$ 2004$ 2006$ 2007$ 2008$ 2009$ 2010$ 2011$ 2012$

Alberta(Wind(Power(Capacity((MW)(Annual$Capacity$Addi8ons$

Cumula8ve$Capacity$

Emission  reducBons  correlate  with  addiBonal  clean  power.  Programs  have  been  criBcal  for  development  of  wind  power.  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas  Energy  Consul7ng  Inc.   7  

WPPI

ecoENERGY

SGER

CPUC TRECS

84.74  

57.35  

77.18  67.25  

89.05  

106.96  

88.88  

119.41  

60.75  

115.50  

64.44  

Electricity  Price  $/MWh  

WPPI – Wind Power Production Incentive ecoENERGY – Production Incentive SGER – Specified Gas Emitters Regulation CPUC TRECS – California Public Utility Commission Tradable Renewable Energy Certificates SPPA – Small Power Producers Act

SPPA

Changes  in  Alberta…..  •  Provincial  Regula7ons  

– Renewable  Fuel  Standards  -­‐  exis7ng  – Provincial  GHG  Targets  -­‐    may  intensify  – Alterna7ve  and  Renewable  Strategy  –  Work  In  Progress  

•  Federal  Regula7ons  – Coal  Genera7on  Re7rements  – Natural  Gas  Power  Genera7on  regula7on  pending  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 8  

Federal  regulaBons  reduce  grid  emissions  intensity.    Hydro  &  Wind  criBcal  &  contribute  cumulaBve  104  Mt  (2039)    

•  Federal  Regula7ons  drop  emissions  intensity  as  shown  in  AESO  LTO.  

 •  AESO  LTO  assumes:    

–  incremental  Wind  and  Hydro  development  

–  Repowering  of  end  of  life  wind  assets  ader  20  years  

•  Cumula7ve  benefit  of  Wind  and  Hydro  104  MT  by  2039.  –  ~  7.5Mtonnes  p.a.  (2039)  –  Equivalent  to  2.5  years  of  

today’s  grid  emissions.  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 9  

!"!!!!

!1!!

!2!!

!3!!

!4!!

!5!!

!6!!

!7!!

!8!!

0!

0.1!

0.2!

0.3!

0.4!

0.5!

0.6!

0.7!

0.8!

2015! 2020! 2025! 2030! 2035! 2040!

MTo

nnes'COEe'

Grid'Average'(T

onne

s'CO2e/M

Wh)'

Year'

Comparison'of'AESO'LTO'and'LTO'without'addiBonal'Wind'or'Hydro'

Grid'Average,'No'addiBonal'Hydro'or'Wind'Grid'Average,'AESO'LTO'

Tonnes'Delta'

Unique  Aspects  of  the  Alberta  Electricity  Market  

•  De-­‐regulated  •  Fair  Efficient  Openly  Compe77ve  Regula7on  •  Energy  Only  Market  •  Facility  Based  Emission  Reduc7on  Obliga7ons  •  Large  coal  genera7on  base  •  Few  physical  contracts  •  Few  long  term  contracts  •  Transforma7onal  change  pending  •  ~7,000  MW  of  addi7onal  genera7on  required  with  pending  coal  re7rement,  and  demand  growth  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 10  

Three  challenges  in  Alberta’s  Electricity  Sector  

•  Cleaning  the  grid  – Reducing  emissions  from  our  electricity  sector  

•  Avoiding  ‘sole  fuel’  dependency  in  the  grid  – Reliance  on  a  single  fuel  adds  significant  risk  to  all  industrial  sectors  in  the  Alberta  economy.    

•  Financing  the  growth  – Balance  sheet/  project  financing  for  ~7,000  MW  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 11  

What  is  the  Problem?  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas  Energy  Consul7ng  Inc.   12  

Lack  of  Long  Term  Power  Purchase  Agreement  (PPA)  

Capture  Rate  

Project  Financing  

Credit  &  Risk  Requirements  

A  PotenBal  SoluBon!  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 13  

A  mechanism  is  needed  that  is:  þ  Technology  neutral,  þ  Revenue  Neutral,  þ  FEOC  compliant,  þ  Fits  the  exis7ng  market  

design,  þ  Compliments  the  Specified  

Gas  Emimers  Regula7on,  þ  Produces  predictable  

changes  in  the  grid  intensity,  

þ  Transparent,  and  þ  Simple  to  administer  and  

understand.  

 FEOC  –  Fair  Efficient  and  Openly  Compe77ve  

What  is  CES  trying  to  achieve?  

Alberta  Electricity  Market  Challenges  q   Cleaning  the  grid  q   Avoiding  ‘sole  fuel’  dependency  in  the  grid  

q   Financing  the  growth  

CES  Scorecard?    þ     þ         þ     

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 14  

Clean  Electricity  Standard  (CES)  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 15  

Clean  Electricity  Standard  •  Clean  Electricity  Standard  would  be  

set  by  the  government  on  a  pornolio  intensity  basis  (Tonnes  CO2e/MWh)  

•  Standard  would  apply  to  Retailers  in  Alberta  –  Any  one  who  purchases  power  to  

supply  load  

•  Intensity  level  decreases  over  7me.  •  Retailers  choice  on  genera7on  

technologies  as  part  of  pornolio.  •  Retailers  choose  to  comply  as  much  

or  as  limle  as  desired.  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 16  

2010$ 2015$ 2020$ 2025$ 2030$ 2035$

Retailer(P

or+o

lio(In

tensity

((ton

nes(

CO2e/M

Wh(

Year(

Clean(Electricity(Standard(

Who  is  Regulated  under  CES?    

•  Retailers    •  Self-­‐Retailers    •  Rural  Electrifica7on  Associa7ons  (REAs)  

•  Based  on  semlement  physical  volumes  with  the  AESO  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 17  

Concurrent  solu7on  –  complementary    

Fit  with  Specified  Gas  Emi]ers  RegulaBon  (SGER)  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 18  

Power  Pool  

SGER:  Generators/Facili7es  CES:   Par7cipants  (Purchaser/Retailers/Marketers)  

Retailers  

Self-­‐Retailers  

REAs  

Comparison  of  CES  and  SGER  

SGER  •  Focus  on  all  facility  emissions  –  

mulB  sector  •  Reduc7on  of  emissions  intensity  

from  facility  •  Compliance  through  facility  

emission  reducBons  •  Financial  Compliance  Alterna7ve  

(CCEMC)  •  Compliance  funds  used  to  s7mulate  

long  term  emission  reduc7ons  •  Tradable  Units  •  Offsets  

CES  •  Focus  on  retailer  pornolio  intensity  

–  single  sector  •  Reduc7on  in  emissions  intensity  of  

por_olio  •  Compliance  through  contracBng  

for  cleaner  por_olio.  •  Financial  Compliance  Alterna7ve  

(Deposit)  •  Compliance  funds  used  to  s7mulate  

shorter  term  market  reponse  •  No  tradable  units  generated  •  No  Offsets  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 19  

Achieving  Compliance  

•  Each  retailer  will  be  required  to  pay  a  deposit  to  a  fund  at  a  set  amount  ($/MWh).  

•  At  the  end  of  the  year,  retailers  who  meet  the  CES  will  receive  a  refund  equal  to  their  deposit.  

•  For  retailers  with  pornolio  intensi7es  less  than  the  CES,  will  receive  a  greater  refund.  

•  For  retailers  with  pornolio  intensi7es  more  than  the  CES,  will  receive  a  less  of  a  refund.  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 20  

Refund  Varies  based  on  Retailer  Performance  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 21  

AT  THE  STANDARD,  THE  REFUND  IS  EQUAL  TO  THE  DEPOSIT  

A  Contextual  Example:    Bo]le  Recycling  in  Alberta  

•  A  deposit  is  paid  on  the  purchase  of  a  beverage  container  

•  Albertans  return  82%  of  containers  purchased  for  a  refund  

•  Benefit:  390,000  cubic  metres  of  landfill  space  saved  

•  Managing  Agency  funded  en7rely  from  deposit  paid  on  beverage  container  purchases  

•  Deposit  and  refund  system  cri7cal  to  creaBng  culture  of  recycling  and  improving  environment  

•  Alberta’s  beverage  container  recycling  industry  in  best  in  class  in  North  America.  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 22  

Direct  Benefits  the  CES  þ  Reduces  grid  intensity  in  Alberta  þ  Drives  demand  for  low  emiqng  genera7on  þ  Increases  the  diversity  and  amount  of  low  emiqng  genera7on  þ  Uses  market  mechanisms  to  achieve  reduc7ons  in  grid  intensity  þ  Provides  long-­‐term  financing  for  low  emiqng  genera7on  þ  Simple  to  administer  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 23  

QuesBons?  

13-­‐05-­‐21   Solas Energy Consulting Inc. 24