ACEDS-Kroll Ontrack 2-24-15 Webcast
-
Upload
robbie-hilson -
Category
Law
-
view
117 -
download
1
Transcript of ACEDS-Kroll Ontrack 2-24-15 Webcast
Delivering Global Ediscovery Successfully
Emily A. Cobb, Ropes & Gray
Andrew Szczech, Kroll Ontrack
Thomas Sely, Kroll Ontrack
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack
Join Today! aceds.org/join
Exclusive News and Analysis
Monthly Members-Only Webcasts
Networking with CEDS, Members
On-Demand Training
Resources
Jobs Board
bits + bytes Newsletter
Affinity Partner Discounts
“ACEDS provides an excellent, much needed forum… to train, network and stay current on critical information.”
Kimarie Stratos, General Counsel, Memorial Health Systems, Ft. Lauderdale
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack4
Webinar Overview
Introduction and Biographies
Legal Frameworks
Cultural Considerations
Practical Experiences
Questions
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack5
Emily A. Cobb, Ropes & Gray
Emily A. Cobb is an associate and senior discovery attorney at Ropes & Gray, with expertise in electronic discovery across numerous practice areas. Ms. Cobb also maintains an active pro bono practice.
Ms. Cobb practiced in Washington, D.C. before joining Ropes & Gray, where her practice included mass tort litigation, multi-district litigations, and additional commercial litigation in federal and state courts throughout the United States.
Currently, Ms. Cobb concentrates on creating, monitoring, and implementing best practices and strategies for electronic discovery. Ms. Cobb works closely with Ropes & Gray’s ediscovery attorneys and Litigation Technology professionals to analyze metrics, workflows and new technologies to identify and implement opportunities for improving quality and efficiency in ediscovery.
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack6
Andrew Szczech, Kroll Ontrack
Andrew Szczech, Director of Legal Technologies Services, is responsible for the growth and delivery of Kroll Ontrack’s legal technologies services in the EMEA region.
These services include ediscovery, computer forensics and consulting which are provided in order to assist clients in multiple practice areas including dispute resolution and antitrust. Frequently, there is a need for solutions to address complex cross border data protection challenges. Andrew also manages the growth and development of global accounts throughout the EMEA region.
Andrew has worked in IT for over 20 years, both in-house and for solution providers. His main focus has always been to ensure clients are able to maximize the use of technology within their organizations.
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack7
Thomas Sely, Kroll Ontrack
Thomas Sely is a Business Development Manager in France. He advises French clients on the management of electronic evidence and the use of legal technology in matters ranging from forensics investigations, compliance audits and French & EU competition regulatory investigations to litigation and dispute resolution.
Thomas is regularly consulted on the practicalities surrounding the collection, management, processing, review and production of electronic evidence, particularly where issues of French data privacy and data protection are concerned.
Thomas holds a DEA Droit des affaires and a Master in Business Administration from the University of Lyon. He is fluent in French and English.
Introduction
8
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack9
Legal Frameworks
10
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack11
Discussion Points
Common vs. Civil Law
Ediscovery Rules in Different Jurisdictions
Data Protection Laws in Europe and the Extra-Territorial Reach of Regulators
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack12
Common vs. Civil Law
Civil lawCommon law
Sharia lawMixed law
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack13
Ediscovery Rules in Different Jurisdictions
Main differences between US and UK: » Narrower scope of discovery allowed in the UK:
– UK CPR Rule 31.6: requires disclosure of documents on which the party relies or which affect “the case”
» In the UK, there is the obligation to proactively produce clients’ relevant documents to opponents
» Proportionality standards more defined in the UK
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack14
Ediscovery Rules in Different Jurisdictions
Main differences between US and UK: » Broader scope of discovery allowed in the US:
– US FRCP 26(b)(1): “any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter in the pending action…”
» In the US, lawyers must request opponents’ relevant documents
» Proportionality standards less defined
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack15
Ediscovery Rules in Different Jurisdictions
Ediscovery is a global phenomenon
In EMEA and APAC, ediscovery is quickly evolving due to the number of US companies in the region and the need to produce information in US litigation
Some countries have no formal discovery duties; however, a role for ediscovery still exists to support the review of company data in:» Investigations
» Internal audits
» M&A work
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack16
Data Protection Laws in Europe
Complex data protection / privacy laws vary per country
Clash with US discovery laws can lead to sanctions
New EU Data Protection Regulation: the law is about to get stricter which may lead to higher fines and greater extra-territorial reach
Legal and technology solutions help transfer data safely» How safe is the “Safe Harbor”?
» Are there local solutions?
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack17
Questions You May Have?
Do US discovery
rules trump data privacy
laws?
Do all countries have the same
approach to privacy?
How do companies
address these
challenges?
What to do when faced with a case where data
is outside of the US?
What to do about the new EU
Data Protection
regulations?
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack18
Data Protection Laws in Europe
Why does data have to remain in France?» When overseas authorities order the disclosure of French data, it is
getting harder to comply
» Primary reasons:– Blocking statute in penal law says you cannot send evidence out of
country for legal matters in other jurisdictions without specific procedure
– French Secrecy Law: French Parliament wants to enact this to better protect French business’ trade secrecy against request of documents from foreign authorities
» As data protection and business secrecy laws tighten up in France, it is important that clients have more control over their data
Cultural Considerations
19
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack20
Discussion Points
What is it like to do business across the globe?
How do employees consider themselves in different parts of the world?
What are the differing attitudes toward privacy?
Do cultural differences affect attitudes towards discovery?
Practical Experiences
21
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack22
Discussion Points
Collecting data scattered in different countries
Reviewing documents in multiple languages
Complying with data protection and privacy laws restricting data transfer across borders
Adopting a seamless approach to processing and review throughout different countries
Dealing with clients with different ediscovery experience levels in in their countries
Straddling different cost models
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack23
Collecting Data Scattered in Different Countries
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack24
Reviewing Documents in Multiple Languages
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack25
Complying with Data Protectionand Privacy Laws Restricting Data Transfer Across Borders
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack26
Adopting a Seamless Approach to Processing and Review Throughout
Different Countries
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack27
Dealing with Clients with Different Ediscovery Experience Levels in
Their Countries
Proprietary and Confidential | Kroll Ontrack28
Straddling Different Cost Models
Questions
29