Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of...

30
Bureau of Mines Report of lnvestigations/l987 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico By S. J. Kravits, A. Sainato, and G. L. Finfinger UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Transcript of Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of...

Page 1: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

Bureau of Mines Report of lnvestigations/l987

Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

By S. J. Kravits, A. Sainato, and G. L. Finfinger

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT O F T H E INTERIOR

Page 2: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

Report of Investigations 9102

Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

By S. J. Kravits, A. Sainato, and G. L. Finfinger

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Donald Paul Hodel, Secretary

BUREAU OF MINES David S. Brown, Acting Director

Page 3: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data :

Kravits, S. J. (Stephen J.) Accurate directional borehole drilling.

(Report of investigations ; 9102)

Bibliography: p. 18.

Supt. of Docs. no.: 1 28.23: 9102.

1. Directional drilling-New Mexico-Navajo Dam. I. Sainato, Albert. 11. Finfinger, Gerald L. 111 Title. IV. Series: Report of investigations (United States. Bureau of Mines) ; 9102.

Page 4: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

CONTENTS Page

A b s t r a c t ........................................................................ 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n ................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ................................................................ 2 T e s t s i t e ...................................................................... 2 D r i l l i n g equipment ............................................................. 3

H y d r a u l i c d r i l l .............................................................. 3 In -ho le motor ................................................................ 3 Boreho le t r a j e c t o r y c o n t r o l d e v i c e s .......................................... 5

Survey ing equipment and p r o c e d u r e s ............................................. 9 S i n g l e - s h o t s u r v e y i n s t r u m e n t ................................................ 9 Survey ing accuracy ........................................................... 10

P l a n n i n g t h e boreho le .......................................................... 11 D i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g t h e d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e ................................ 13

E f f e c t i v e n e s s i n c o n t r o l l i n g b o r e h o l e t r a j e c t o r y ............................. 13 Boreho le punchout and i n v e s t i g a t i n g e r r o r i n az imuth ......................... 15

Conc lus ions .................................................................... 18 R e f e r e n c e s ..................................................................... 18 Appendix.--Dril l and b o r e h o l e s u r v e y log^.........................^............ 19

ILLUSTRATIONS

Navajo Dam l o c a t i o n map .................................................. 3 Navajo Dam r i g h t abutment ................................................ 4 Navajo Dam d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e d r i l l s i t e ............................. 4 H y d r a u l i c d r i l l and c o n t r o l p a n e l ........................................ 5 In-hole motor s c h e m a t i c .................................................. 5 In-hole motor o p e r a t i n g p a r a m e t e r s ....................................... 6 P o l y c r y s t a l l i n e diamond c u t t e r b i t s ...................................... 6 In-hole motor equipped w i t h a 2O ben t hous ing ............................ 6 S i d e f o r c e d iagram ....................................................... 7 Var ious t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s and t h e i r e f f e c t s on boreho le t r a j e c t o r y ...... 8 S i n g l e - s h o t d i r e c t i o n a l s u r v e y i n s t r u m e n t ................................ 9 Reading developed s u r v e y f i l m d i s k ....................................... 9 Survey hardware .......................................................... 10 Nonmagnetic d r i l l c o l l a r and compass s p a c i n g s e l e c t i o n c h a r t ............. 11 V e r t i c a l s e c t i o n of p lanned d e m o n s t r a t i o n boreho le ....................... 12 ............................... Map view of p lanned d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e 12 V e r t i c a l s e c t i o n of d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e ....................a.e........ 13 P l a n view of d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e ..................................... 14 Var ious ben t hous ings .................................................... 14 Borehole punchout ........................................................ 17

TABLES

1. Measured d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s u s i n g 2' bent hous ing .......................... 1 6 A-1 . Log of d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g p a r a m e t e r s ................................... 19 A-2 . Demonst ra t ion b o r e h o l e s u r v e y l o g and l o g of d e s i r e d d e p a r t u r e s .......... 22

Page 5: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

UNIT OF MEASURE ABBREVIATIONS USED

EMU e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c u n i t Ib f

f t f o o t m i n

f t 0 l b f f o o t pound ( f o r c e ) nT

g a l / m i n g a l l o n p e r minute p s i

hp horsepower ~ s i g

i n i n c h r /min

i n / m i n i n c h p e r minute V a c

IN THIS REPORT

pound f o r c e

minute

n a n o t e s l a

pound p e r s q u a r e i n c h

pound p e r s q u a r e i n c h , gauge

r e v o l u t i o n p e r minute

v o l t , a l t e r n a t i n g c u r r e n t

Page 6: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

ACCURATE DIRECTIONAL BOREHOLE DRILLING: A CASE STUDY AT NAVAJO DAM, NEW MEXICO

1 By S. J. Kravits,' A. S a i n a t ~ , ~ and G. L. Finfinger3

ABSTRACT

T h i s r e p o r t d e s c r i b e s a p r o j e c t conducted by t h e Bureau of Mines i n which t h e a c c u r a t e d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g of a boreho le was demons t ra t ed w i t h t h e o b j e c t i v e of i n t e r c e p t i n g a d e s i g n a t e d t a r g e t . The p r o j e c t was conducted a t Navajo Dam i n n o r t h e r n New Mexico a t t h e r e q u e s t of t h e Bu- r e a u of Reclamation. Borehole s u r v e y and d r i l l l o g s a r e p rov ided i n a n appendix .

The t r a j e c t o r y of t h e d e m o n s t r a t i o n b o r e h o l e was des igned t o i n t e r c e p t a 5 - f t - r a d i u s t a r g e t a t t h e f i n a l o r "punchout" d i s t a n c e of 885 f t . The e l e v a t i o n of t h e b o r e h o l e a t t h i s d i s t a n c e was w i t h i n t h e t a r g e t ; t h e b o r e h o l e punchout c o o r d i n a t e s were 8.81 f t sou thwes t of t h e t a r g e t . A s a r e s u l t of t h e demons t ra t ed a c c u r a c y , t h e Bureau of Reclamat ion h a s c o n t r a c t e d t h e a c c u r a t e d r i l l i n g of b o r e h o l e s a s l o n g a s 600 f t from t h e i n s i d e of a s h o r t t u n n e l , t o c o n t r o l w a t e r seepage i n t h e r i g h t a b u t - ment. T h i s r e s u l t e d i n a s u b s t a n t i a l c o s t s a v i n g s compared t o t h e o r i g - i n a l p l a n of c o n s t r u c t i n g a l o n g e r t u n n e l and d r i l l i n g 150-ft bo reho les .

' ~ i n i n g e n g i n e e r . 2 ~ i n i n g e n g i n e e r i n g t e c h n i c i a n . 3 ~ u p e r v i s o r y g e o l o g i s t .

P i t t s b u r g h Research C e n t e r , Bureau of Mines, P i t t s b u r g h , PA.

Page 7: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

INTRODUCTION

The Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Depart- ment of t h e I n t e r i o r , r eques ted t h e Bu- r e au of Mines, through In te ragency Agree- ment No. 1409-0070-1212, t o demonstra te t h e accuracy of d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g a nea r -ho r i zon t a l borehole t o i n t e r c e p t a de s igna t ed t a r g e t . The Bureau of Recla- mat ion ' s o b j e c t i v e was t o determine t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of u s ing a c c u r a t e l y d r i l l e d boreholes t o c o n t r o l wa te r seep- age through open j o i n t s i n bedrock foun- d a t i o n s of embankment dams.

The Bureau of Mines has researched and demonstra ted a c c u r a t e d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l - i n g a s p a r t of i t s methane c o n t r o l pro- gram (1-3).4 - - I n 1979, a d i r e c t i o n a l s u r f a c e borehole was d r i l l e d us ing an in-hole motor5 t o a measured depth of

1,595 f t , main ta in ing an a r c of 6" per 100 f t and coming w i t h i n 3 f t of i n t e r - c ep t i ng t h e P i t t sbu rgh Coalbed 1,012 f t below t h e su r f ace . Five h o r i z o n t a l meth- ane d ra inage boreholes were t hen d r i l l e d from t h e s u r f a c e borehole , t o t a l i n g 9,544 f t .

The Bureau has a l s o demonstrated d r i l l - i n g accuracy i n d r i l l i n g long h o r i z o n t a l methane dra inage boreholes i n underground c o a l mines. Methane dra inage boreholes have been d r i l l e d t o dep ths g r e a t e r t han 2,000 f t , main ta in ing v e r t i c a l borehole t r a j e c t o r y w i th in t h e coalbed (approxi- mately 6 f t ) whi le c o n t r o l l i n g h o r i z o n t a l t r a j e c t o r y a s d e s i r e d t o prevent i n t e r - c ep t i on by f u t u r e mining (2-2). -

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The coopera t ion of t h e Bureau of Recla- Navajo Dam maintenance s t a f f f o r t h e i r mation was c r i t i c a l i n t h e s u c c e s s f u l cont inued suppor t and a s s i s t a n c e du r ing complet ion of t h i s p r o j e c t . The au tho r s t h i s p r o j e c t . The a u t h o r s a l s o thank wish t o thank Hunter C. H a r r e l , geolo- Ed J. Blythe, Jr., we l l p lann ing eng i - g i s t , Engineer ing and Research Cente r , nee r , NL Sperry-Sun, Rosenburg, TX f o r Denver, CO; William C. Eh l e r , g e o l o g i s t , t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e provided i n improv- Durango (CO) P r o j e c t s O f f i c e ; Leonard i n g survey ing accuracy. T r u j i l l o , Navajo Dam supe r in t enden t ; and

TEST SITE

Navajo Dam i s a zoned embankment s t r u c - t u r e i n no r the rn New Mexico, 39 mi les e a s t of Farmington, NM, and about 35 mi l e s s o u t h e a s t of Durango, CO ( f i g . 1 ) . It is one of t h e key s t r u c t u r e s of t h e Colorado River S torage P r o j e c t , regu- l a t i n g t h e f lows of t h e San Juan River and prov id ing s t o r a g e f o r Navajo Ind i an I r r i g a t i o n P r o j e c t . It a l s o p rov ides a f a c i l i t y f o r r e c r e a t i o n and f i s h and w i l d l i f e conserva t ion . Navajo Dam,

' unde r l ined numbers i n p a r e n t h e s e s r e - f e r t o i t e m s i n t h e l i s t o f r e f e r e n c e s p r e c e d i n g t h e appendix .

cons t ruc t ed from 1958 t o 1963, is approx- imate ly 400 f t i n s t r u c t u r a l h e i g h t , 3,600 f t i n c r e s t l e n g t h , 30 f t i n t o p width, and 2,500 f t i n maximum base width (6). The r i g h t abutment of t h e dam was chosen f o r t h e l o a c t i o n of t h e demonstra- t i o n borehole , wi th designed punchout occu r r i ng nea r t h e top of t h e s p i l l w a y ( f i g s . 2-3).

5 ~ h e te rm i n - h o l e i s synonymous w i t h downhole. The a u t h o r s f e e l i n - h o l e i s more d e s c r i p t i v e l y a c c u r a t e when b o r e h o l e t r a j e c t o r y i s n e a r h o r i z o n t a l .

Page 8: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

DRILLING EQUIPMENT

A Diamant ~ o a r t ~ DBH 700 h y d r a u l i c c o r e d r i l l and a 2-7/8-in-OD high- torque, non- magnetic in-hole motor manufactured by S l i m d r i l , Inc . , were used t o d r i l l t h e borehole . The in -ho le motor was equipped w i t h a bent hous ing and two 3-1/2-in-OD p o l y c r y s t a l l i n e diamond c u t t e r b i t s (used s e p a r a t e l y ) , one manufactured by Longyear and one by S l i m d r i l , Inc.

' ~ e f e r e n c e t o s p e c i f i c equ ipmen t d o e s n o t imp ly endor semen t by t h e Bureau o f Mines.

Key mop

COLORADO

MEXICO u

I 1 LEGEND

@ U. S. highway @ State highway - Unpaved road

---- State boundary

County boundary

o Townorcity

0 10 20

Scale, miles

FIGURE 1.-Navajo Dam location map. Adapted from Bureau of Reclamation map.

HYDRAULIC D R I L L

The main components of t h e Diamant Boar t DBH 700 u n i t a r e t h e d r i l l i t s e l f , c o n t r o l p a n e l , and power u n i t ( f i g . 4 ) . To d r i l l t h e demons t ra t ion boreho le , t h e d r i l l was p o s i t i o n e d h o r i z o n t a l l y . The power u n i t i s equipped w i t h two h y d r a u l i c r a d i a l p i s t o n pumps, one f o r t h r u s t and one f o r r o t a t i o n , bo th powered by a s i n - g l e 40-hp, 440-V a c e l e c t r i c motor.

IN-HOLE MOTOR

The 2-7/8-in-OD high- torque in-hole mo- t o r i s a pos i t ive -d i sp lacement h y d r a u l i c motor t h a t r o t a t e s t h e d r i l l b i t w i t h o u t r o t a t i n g t h e d r i l l s t r i n g . The in-hole motor c o n v e r t s t h e h y d r a u l i c horsepower g e n e r a t e d by t h e f low of t h e d r i l l i n g f l u i d ( w a t e r ) under p r e s s u r e i n t o t o r q u e and i n t o t h e r o t a t i o n a l speed o r mechani- c a l power t h a t d r i v e s t h e d r i l l b i t (5) . The components of t h e high- torque motor a r e i d e n t i f i e d i n f i g u r e 5.

When d r i l l i n g f l u i d is pumped through t h e d r i l l s t r i n g and t h e in -ho le motor a t r a t e s of 30 t o 70 gal /min a t d i f f e r e n t i a l p r e s s u r e s of 250 t o 625 p s i g , t h e h e l i c a l s t a i n l e s s s t e e l r o t o r r o t a t e s i n s i d e t h e rubber molded s t a t o r . The range of Slim- d r i l o p e r a t i n g paramete rs i s shown i n f i g u r e 6; t h e a c t u a l pa ramete rs a p p l i e d a r e l i s t e d i n t a b l e A-1 (appendix) . Ro- t a t i o n of t h e d r i v e s h a f t , p o s i t i o n e d w i t h i n t h e b e a r i n g package, i s t r a n s - m i t t e d by t h e f l ex-coupl ing , c o n v e r t i n g t h e e c c e n t r i c r o t a r y motion of t h e h e l i - c a l r o t o r t o c o n c e n t r i c motion. The d r i v e s u b i s connected t o t h e d r i v e s h a f t and i s t h e on ly r o t a t i n g e x t e r n a l compo- n e n t of t h e in -ho le motor. The d r i l l b i t i s f a s t e n e d t o t h e d r i v e sub. Two 3-1/2- in-OD p o l y c r y s t a l l i n e diamond c u t t e r b i t s , one each from Longyear and Slim- d r i l , Inc . , were e q u a l l y used t o d r i l l

Page 9: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

FIGURE 2.-Navajo Dam right abutment.

FIGURE 3.-Navajo Dam demonstration borehole drill site.

Page 10: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

FIGURE 4.-A, Hydraulic drill; 8, control panel. Power unit not shown.

Bearing package NW rod box threa

NQ rod Crossover sub

box thread

Not to scale

FIGURE 5.-In-hole motor schematic. Stator, rotor and exterior nousing are nonmagnetic. Bearing package and drive sub are magnetic.

t h e demons t ra t ion boreho le ( f i g . 7). BOREHOLE TRAJECTORY CONTROL DEVICES P o l y c r y s t a l l i n e diamond c u t t e r b i t s a r e recommended f o r u s e w i t h in-hole motors Various t y p e s of d e v i c e s can be used because t h e y a r e des igned t o o p e r a t e a t w i t h in-hole motors t o c o n t r o l boreho le h i g h r o t a t i n g speeds f o r extended p e r i - t r a j e c t o r y . These i n c l u d e b e n t hous ings , ods. The demons t ra t ion b o r e h o l e ' s h o r i - bent s u b s , e c c e n t r i c s u b s , and d e f l e c t i o n z o n t a l and v e r t i c a l boreho le t r a j e c t o r i e s shoes. An in-hole motor equipped w i t h a were c o n t r o l l e d d u r i n g in-hole motor 2' ben t housing i s shown i n f i g u r e 8. d r i l l i n g by u s i n g c o n t r o l dev ices .

Page 11: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

MOTOR PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL, psi

FIGURE 6.-In-hole motor operating parameters. Water sup- plied to in-hole motor under pressure by two triple-piston pumps.

- Scale, in

FIGURE 7.-Polycrystalline diamond cutter bits.

While d r i l l i n g , t h e r e i s continuous FIGURE 8.-In-hole motor equipped with a 2' bent housing. con tac t between t h e convex s i d e of t h e bent housing and t h e wa l l of t he bore- i s c a l l e d t o o l face d i r e c t i o n and is ho le ; t h i s i s commonly c a l l e d s i d e force. t h e d i r e c t i o n borehole t r a j e c t o r y w i l l The r e s u l t a n t r e a c t i o n of t h e s i d e f o r c e follow. Various t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s and exe r t ed on t h e wa l l of t h e borehole i s a t h e i r e f f e c t s on borehole v e r t i c a l and f o r c e exer ted on t h e b i t i n t h e oppos i te ho r i zon ta l t r a j e c t o r i e s a r e shown i n d i r e c t i o n o r 180' away ( f ig . 9). The d i - f i g u r e 10. r e c t i o n of t h e fo rce exer ted on t h e b i t

Page 12: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

Side force (at 0")

Tool face at 180" (low s~de) force exerted on bit

(reaction of s ~ d e force w tool face at 1 80° 1

Side force (at 0" )

Tool face at 180° (low s ~ d e )

Dlrect~on of force exerted on b ~ t resulting in vertlcal

drop of hole trajectory FIGURE 9.-Side force diagram. Above in-hole motor equipped with bent housing; below, side force

schematic.

Def l ec t ion r a t e s p e r t a i n i n g t o known t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s a r e r a t e s a t which borehole i n c l i n a t i o n and azimuth (bear- i n g ) change o r d e f l e c t dur ing d r i l l i n g . The r a t e of change i n borehole i n c l i n a - t i o n i s t h e v e r t i c a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e ; t h e h o r i z o n t a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e i s t h e r a t e of change i n azimuth. Es tab l i shed

d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s would be used t o pe r i - o d i c a l l y p r o j e c t o r estimate b i t p o s i t i o n 16 f t ahead of t h e cu r r en t survey depth and t o decide what t o o l f ace s e t t i n g should be appl ied t o t h e next d r i l l i n g i n t e r v a l i n order t o maintain des i r ed borehole t r a j e c t o r y . V e r t i c a l and hor i - z o n t a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s a r e determined by

Page 13: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

Maximum build in inclination

5. Left H 5' Right

Maximum and hold

5O Right

5" Maximum azimuth turn

and hold inclination

Maximum drop in inclination

FIGURE 10.-Various tool face settings and their effects on borehole trajectory. Black arrow depicts tool face setting of 45' right, which would result in borehole trajectory building inclination and azimuth turning right (east).

observing t h e change i n i n c l i n a t i o n and azimuth from t h e previous t o t h e cu r r en t borehole survey depth. For example, re- f e r r i n g t o t h e t h i r d page of t a b l e A-2, t h e v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s observed from survey depths 449 t o 459 f t were 0.09"/ft (0.9" dur ing 10-ft i n t e r v a l ) and 0.19"/ft ( e a s t is posi- t i v e ) , r e spec t ive ly . A t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g of 60" t o 80" r i g h t was appl ied us ing a 2" bent housing while d r i l l i n g from 445 t o 475 f t . When t h e survey was conducted a t 459 f t , t he b i t depth was 475 f t . To p r o j e c t t h e i n c l i n a t i o n a t t he b i t depth of 475 i t , t h e e s t a b l i s h e d v e r t i c a l de- f l e c t i o n r a t e of 0 .09"/f t was mul t ip l i ed by 16 f t and added t o t h e surveyed i n c l i - n a t i o n a t 459 f t . This r e s u l t e d i n a p ro j ec t ed i n c l i n a t i o n of 101.8". The azimuth a t t h e b i t depth was pro jec ted t o be 343.0" by mul t ip ly ing t h e h o r i z o n t a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e of 0.19"/ft by 16 f t and

adding t h e azimuth surveyed a t 459 f t of 340.0". The pro jec ted i n c l i n a t i o n and azimuth a t 475 f t were c l o s e t o t h e ac- t u a l r e s u l t s surveyed l a t e r a t 479 f t ( t a b l e A-2). Angle averaging, which i s a surveying c a l c u l a t i o n method, was used t o c a l c u l a t e pro jec ted coord ina tes and e l e - va t ion a t t h e b i t (2, 6). Establ i shed d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s pe r t a in ing t o t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s and bent housing used a r e pro- vided l a t e r i n t h e t e x t .

Tool f ace d i r e c t i o n s a r e changed by t u r n i n g t h e d r i l l s t r i n g clockwise wi th pipe wrenches t o a p o s i t i o n O0 t o 180" l e f t o r r i g h t from t h e c e n t e r l i n e a long t h e top of t h e boring. Borehole i n c l i n a - t i o n , azimuth, and t o o l f a c e d i r e c t i o n were cont inuously monitored and ad jus t ed t o achieve d i r e c t i o n a l c o n t r o l o r t o maintain t h e des i r ed h o r i z o n t a l and ver- t i c a l borehole t r a j e c t o r i e s .

Page 14: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

SURVEYING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES

SINGLE-SHOT SURVEY INSTRUMENT

An NL Sperry-Sun type B 120° magnetic d i r e c t i o n a l s ing le -shot survey instrument was used dur ing d r i l l i n g t o monitor bore- ho l e i n c l i n a t i o n , bear ing, and t o o l f a c e d i r e c t i o n ( f i g . 11). The e s s e n t i a l e l e - ments of t h e survey instrument a r e t h e compass, i n c l i n a t i o n u n i t , b a t t e r i e s and f i l m loading mechanism, l e n s and lamp holder , and mechanical t i m e r t h a t c o n t r o l s t h e e l e c t r i c a l c i r c u i t s and il- lumina tes t h e compass-inclination u n i t a t a p r e s e t time t o record t h e p e r t i n e n t d a t a on a f i l m d i s k (7). -

To conduct a survey, t he mechanical t imer of t h e survey instrument is set and t h e instrument is loaded with a f i l m disk. The loaded survey instrument is placed i n i t s p r o t e c t i v e cas ing and i n s e r t e d i n t h e hollow d r i l l rod. It i s pumped wi th water t o t h e back end of t h e in-hole motor, where i t a l i g n s wi th t h e o r i e n t i n g sub. The f i l m d i s k i s exposed a t a p r e s e t t ime, a f t e r which t h e i n s t r u - ment is r e t r i e v e d by a w i r e l i n e a t t ached t o t h e p r o t e c t i v e casing. The r e t r i e v e d instrument is removed from i t s p r o t e c t i v e cas ing , and t h e f i l m d i s k is removed, developed, and read ( f i g . 12).

FIGURE 11.-Single-shot directional survey instrument.

FIGURE 12.-Reading developed survey film disk.

Page 15: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

SURVEYING ACCURACY

D i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g accuracy i s p r i - mar i ly dependent on borehole surveying accuracy. Fac to r s t h a t i n f luence bore- h o l e accuracy inc lude inhe ren t accuracy of t h e survey ins t rument , magnetic d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r f e r e n c e , survey frequency o r i n t e r v a l , and t h e c a l c u l a t i o n technique used t o compute borehole coord ina tes and e l e v a t i o n .

The NL Sperry-Sun type B 120" d i r ec - t i o n a l s ing le -shot survey instrument was used t o monitor borehole i n c l i n a t i o n , bea r ing , and t o o l f a c e o r i e n t a t i o n . The manufacturer ' s s p e c i f i e d t o l e r a n c e i n measuring bear ing f o r a r e c e n t l y c a l i - b r a t e d compass (survey instrument) i s '0.5O. Furthermore, t h e r e s o l u t i o n i n r ead ing t h e photographed compass bear ing on t h e f i l m d i s k i s a random 20.5". Con- s equen t ly , a p o t e n t i a l e r r o r of '1" ex- i s t s i n measuring borehole bear ings u s ing t h e s u b j e c t survey instrument . The accu- r acy i n surveying f o r i n c l i n a t i o n us ing t h e s u b j e c t survey instrument i s '0.12O. Wolff and deWardt (8) s t a t e t h a t , f o r a compass u n i t i n good cond i t i on , a gener- a l l y accepted sys t ema t i c accuray i s '1". Compass u n i t s measure magnetic n o r t h and r e q u i r e a d e c l i n a t i o n c o r r e c t i o n t o ob- t a i n t r u e north. Wolff and deWardt sug- g e s t t h a t d e c l i n a t i o n c o r r e c t i o n s ob- t a i n e d from c h a r t s may be i n c o r r e c t t o '0.5. The Nat ional Geophysical Data Cen- ter , Boulder, CO, o r t h e U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, can supply an accu- r a t e d e c l i n a t i o n c o r r e c t i o n i f provided w i t h d r i l l s i t e ( c o l l a r ) coord ina tes and e l eva t ion . The d e c l i n a t i o n c o r r e c t i o n a t Navajo Dam d r i l l s i t e was 12" E '13 min. Random misalignment of t h e survey hard- ware and instrument w i th in t h e d r i l l

s t r i n g w i th r e spec t t o t h e borehole i s another p o s s i b l e source of e r r o r i n bore- h o l e surveying f o r bear ing and i n c l i n a - t i o n ( f i g . 13). The magnitude of t h i s source of e r r o r i s d i f f i c u l t t o de t e r - mine; Wolff and deWardt (8) e s t ima te i t a t approximately '0.2 t o *O.SO.

Compass-type surveying instruments sense only t he d i r e c t i o n of t h e l o c a l magnetic f i e l d vec to r and t h e r e f o r e are sub jec t t o sys temat ic d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r - ference. To reduce d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r - fe rence , compass-type survey instruments must be proper ly spaced i n s i d e adequate l eng ths of nonmagnetic d r i l l c o , l l a r (NMDC). The NMDC used t o d r i l l t h e jdem- o n s t r a t i o n borehole cons is ted of a non- magnetic in-hole motor (nonmagnetic ro- t o r and housing 12 f t i n length , bear ing package and b i t made of magnetic m a t e r i a l 2 f t i n l eng th ) and 100 f t of NQ-size w i r e l i n e nonmagnetic s t a i n l e s s steel d r i l l rod. Previous Bureau experience i n d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l i n g long h o r i z o n t a l boreholes i n c o a l f o r methane dra inage has shown t h a t compass spacing of 20 f t above t h e bottom end of 100 f t of NMDC s u f f i c i e n t l y reduces d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r - ference. NL Sperry-Sun has completed se- l e c t i o n c h a r t s a s guides f o r e s t ima t ing compass spacing based on geographical l o c a t i o n (ho r i zon ta l component of t h e e a r t h ' s magnetic f i e l d i n t e n s i t y v a r i e s wi th l o c a t i o n ) , borehole i n c l i n a t i o n , and bear ing, a s i nd i ca t ed i n f i g u r e 14 ( 9 ) . Based on t h e s e l e c t i o n c h a r t shown f o r t h e Navajo Dam loca t ion , uncorrected bear ing of N 10" W , and i n c l i n a t i o n of 90°, t h e compass should be loca ted 20 f t from t h e bottom of t h e NMDC. While con- duc t ing a borehole survey , t h e NL Sperry- Sun s ing le -shot was placed 13 f t from t h e bottom of t h e NMDC, o r 16 f t from t h e

FIGURE 13.-Survey hardware. A , snubber; 19, centralizing pumpdown washers; C, muleshoe.

Page 16: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

BEARING FROM MAGNETIC NORTH OR SOUTH, deg

(Uncorrected for decl inat ion)

F ing

'IGURE 14.-Nonmagnetic drill collar and compass spac- selection chart.

b i t . Although t h i s s p a c i n g was 7 f t less t h a n t h e e s t i m a t e d compass s p a c i n g s , hav- i n g t h e compass c l o s e r t o t h e b i t en- hanced t h e accuray i n p r o j e c t i n g t h e cur- r e n t p o s i t i o n of t h e b i t from t h e su rvey p o s i t i o n .

Two r e l a t e d f a c t o r s t h a t a f f e c t bore- h o l e su rvey ing accuracy a r e su rvey ing f requency and t h e su rvey ing c a l c u l a t i o n t e c h n i q u e used t o determine boreho le co- o r d i n a t e s and e l e v a t i o n . It is g e n e r a l l y accep ted t h a t r e g a r d l e s s of c a l c u l a t i o n t e c h n i q u e a p p l i e d , s h o r t su rvey i n t e r v a l s w i l l r e s u l t i n i n c r e a s e d accuracy (10). Borehole su rveys were conducted a t 10-ft d r i l l i n g i n t e r v a l s a t Navajo Dam. Of t h e dozen o r s o su rvey ing c a l c u l a t i o n t ech- n i q u e s a v a i l a b l e , balanced t a n g e n t i a l , r a d i u s of c u r v a t u r e , minimum c u r v a t u r e , and a n g l e averag ing a r e g e n e r a l l y ac- c e p t e d a s p rov id ing s i m i l a r and a c c e p t - a b l e r e s u l t s (10) . A r a d i u s of c u r v a t u r e program a d a p t e r f o r a Hewlett Packard 15C c a l c u l a t o r was used t o c a l c u l a t e boreho le c o o r d i n a t e s and e l e v a t i o n . Angle averag- i n g was used p e r i o d i c a l l y t o check t h e r a d i u s of c u r v a t u r e r e s u l t s .

PLANNING THE BOREHOLE

The boreho le s t a r t i n g c o o r d i n a t e s were N 19,567.69, E 52,697.69; e l e v a t i o n a t t h e c o l l a r was 5,933.53 f t . The des ig - n a t e d "punchout" was t o occur w i t h i n a 5 - f t r a d i u s of N 20,447.31, E 52,709.41 a t an e l e v a t i o n of 6,049.03 f t ( f i g s . 15- 16). The l o c a t i o n of t h e boreho le was determined a f t e r c o n s i d e r i n g t h e geology of t h e r i g h t abutment and t h e c o n s t r a i n t s t h a t s p e c i f i c g e o l o g i c f e a t u r e s would i m - pose on t h e placement of t h e borehole . The abutment i n t h e v i c i n i t y of t h e bore- h o l e c o n s i s t s predominantly of coarse- to- medium-grained sands tone w i t h i n t e r b e d d e d s h a l e and s i l t s t o n e ( f i g . 15). The sand- s t o n e i s comprised mostly of ve ry hard a n g u l a r q u a r t z g r a i n s weakly t o moderate- l y cemented having an unconf ined compres- s i v e s t r e n g t h of l e s s t h a n 6 ,900 p s i (4 ) . The weak n a t u r e of t h e s a n d s t o n e ' s i n t e r - g r a n u l a r m a t e r i a l i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e rock would probably d r i l l e a s i l y even though t h e s a n d s t o n e ' s q u a r t z g r a i n s were ve ry

and h o r i z o n t a l j o i n t s . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e e x a c t l o c a t i o n s of t h e j o i n t s could n o t be determined because of t h i n s o i l cover , and t h u s t h e boreho le t r a j e c t o r y could n o t be planned t o avo id i n t e r c e p t - i n g them. However, t h e boreho le was de- s igned t o avo id i n t e r c e p t i n g t h e sand- f i l l e d j o i n t shown i n f i g u r e 15. The e l e v a t i o n a t t h e bottom of t h e sand- f i l l e d j o i n t was e s t i m a t e d t o be 5 ,950 f t , o r about 16.5 f t above t h e c o l l a r of t h e borehole . To p reven t d r i l l i n g i n t o t h e j o i n t , t h e f i r s t 250 f t of t h e demon- s t r a t i o n boreho le was t o be d r i l l e d keep- i n g boreho le e l e v a t i o n n e a r t h e e l e v a t i o n of t h e c o l l a r , o r 5 ,933 f t . D r i l l i n g was t o c o n t i n u e from 250 t o 340 f t , by apply- i n g maximum b u i l d and t o o l f a c e d i r e c - t i o n s of 0" t o 20" r i g h t and l e f t ( f i g . 10). A d e s i r e d i n c r e a s e i n boreho le in - c l i n a t i o n from 90.0" ( h o r i z o n t a l i n c l i n a - t i o n ) t o 101.0" (11.0" above h o r i z o n t a l ) would r e s u l t a t 300 t o 340 f t . Borehole

h a r d and a b r a s i v e . Rock o u t c r o p s w i t h i n i n c l i n a t i o n was t h e n t o be main ta ined a t t h e r i g h t abutment c o n t a i n both v e r t i c a l o r n e a r 101.0" t o boreho le complet ion i n

Page 17: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico
Page 18: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

o r d e r t o i n t e r c e p t t h e t a r g e t e leva- s t r a i g h t - l i n e c o l l a r t o punchout t r a j e c - t i o n . While main ta in ing d e s i r e d v e r t i - t o r y having a bea r i ng of N 0"-45'-00" E c a l t r a j e c t o r y a s mentioned, an a t t empt was c a l c u l a t e d and appears i n appendix was t o be made t o main ta in depa r tu r e t a b l e A-2. This in format ion would be w i t h i n 2 f t e a s t o r west from t h e planned used cont inuously du r ing d r i l l i n g t o s t r a i g h t - l i n e c o l l a r t o punchout t r a j e c - monitor d e v i a t i o n from t h e d e s i r e d bore- t o r y ( f i g . 16). The depa r tu r e of t h e ho l e depar tu re .

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING THE DEMONSTRATION BOREHOLE

Seve ra l bent housings were used t o d r i l l t h e demons t ra t ion borehole ; t h e 2" ben t housing was t h e most e f f e c t i v e i n c o n t r o l l i n g v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l t r a - j e c t o r i e s ( f i g . 8 ) . Before d i s c u s s i n g t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of t h e ben t hous ings , t h e d r i l l i n g of t h e bo reho l e ' s v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l t r a j e c t o r i e s i s b r i e f l y descr ibed .

The f i r s t 250 f t of t h e borehole were d r i l l e d main ta in ing e l e v a t i o n nea r t h e c o l l a r e l e v a t i o n a s planned ( f i g . 17). D r i l l i n g con t inued t o a dep th of 495 f t w i thou t deve lop ing t h e necessa ry i n c r e a s e i n v e r t i c a l borehole t r a j e c t o r y . Conse- q u e n t l y , t h e borehole was abandoned i n o r d e r t o s t a r t a new borehole w i t h i n t h e i n i t i a l boreho le a t a dep th of 289 f t . A f t e r t h e new borehole was s t a r t e d a t 289 f t , d r i l l i n g con t inued t o borehole com- p l e t i o n a t 885 f t , main ta in ing d e s i r e d v e r t i c a l t r a j e c t o r y .

Hor izon ta l borehole t r a j e c t o r y du r ing t h e f i r s t 250 f t of t h e borehole was mainta ined t o w i t h i n 2.5 i t of t h e de- s i r e d depar tu re . (Table A-2 g ive s t h e a c t u a l borehole survey l o g and d e s i r e d borehole depar tu res . ) A s d r i l l i n g con- t i nued from 250 f t t o 495 f t , h o r i z o n t a l borehole t r a j e c t o r y dev i a t ed from t h e de- s i r e d course. A f t e r t h e new borehole was s t a r t e d a t 289 f t , h o r i z o n t a l t r a j e c t o r y of t h e new borehole was mainta ined c l o s e t o t h e d e s i r e d course t o borehole comple- t i o n , accord ing t o borehole surveys ( f i g . 18).

EFFECTIVENESS I N CONTROLLING BOREHOLE TRAJECTORY

The 112" bent housing w i th pad was used t o d r i l l t h e i n i t i a l borehole t o a dep th of 455 f t ( f i g . 19). Although t h e de- s i r e d v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l borehole

Target elevation.

1301 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 , , 6.0?;6.0?

HORIZONTAL DEPTH. f t

FIGURE 17.-Vertical section of demonstration borehole.

120

110-

l o o -

90-

C .I- 80-

i 70- 0 F 6 0 - P

5 0 - W

40

3 0

2 0 -

- I 0 0

-

-

- KEY

Surveyed elevation station - of Initial borehole -

- A Surveyed elevation station - of new borehole, sidetracked

- from initial borehole - -

- Collar elevation, 5,933.53 f t

-

o.*-f . - . - - - - - - - = -.-

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ l l l l l l l l l l

100 2 0 0 300 400 5 0 0 6 0 0 700 800 900

Page 19: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

- 4 - " " 1 " I , , , I I I I

-2 -

Actual punchout, measured

boundary of 5-ft - radius target

10-

12-

LATITUDE, f t 8 FIGURE 18.-Plan view of demonstration borehole. Abandoned borehole from 279 to 495 ft not shown. Before drilling of side-

tracked borehole began a t 289 ft, initial borehole resurveyed from 89 to 279 ft at 30-ft intervals as shown.

FIGURE 19.-Various bent housings. Top to bottom: 2' bent housing on in-hole motor, slip-on shoe, lo bent housing with pad, 112" bent housing with pad.

t r a j e c t o r i e s were maintained t o a depth of 250 f t , t h e v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s were i n c o n s i s t e n t and unpredic tab le . D r i l l i n g continued t o a dep th of 455 f t without success i n bring- i n g t h e v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l borehole t r a j e c t o r i e s t o t h e d e s i r e d course. The i n c o n s i s t e n t d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s caus ing poor t r a j e c t o r y c o n t r o l r e s u l t e d from a

lack of s u f f i c i e n t s i d e f o r c e being gen- e r a t e d while u s ing t h e 112' bent housing. The weak n a t u r e of t h e sands tone ' s i n t e r - g r anu la r ma te r i a l i s bel ieved t o have ne- ga ted any p o t e n t i a l s i d e f o r c e generated by t h e 112' bent housing. A t a depth of 455 f t , t h e d r i l l s t r i n g and in-hole mo- t o r were pu l l ed ou t of t he borehole t o r ep l ace t h e 112" housing with a l o bent

Page 20: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

h o u s i n g , a f t e r i t became a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e n e c e s s a r y i n c r e a s e i n e l e v a t i o n of 112 f t and change i n d e p a r t u r e of 14 f t e a s t r e q u i r e d t o i n t e r c e p t t h e t a r g e t c o u l d n o t be accomplished u s i n g t h e 112" b e n t housing.

D r i l l i n g con t inued from 455 f t t o a d e p t h of 495 f t u s i n g t h e 1" ben t hous ing w i t h pad ( f i g . 19). Even though t h e ve r - t i c a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s were more c o n s i s - t e n t when compared t o t h e 112" ben t hous- i n g , t h e h o r i z o n t a l boreho le t r a j e c t o r y c o n t i n u e d west i n s t e a d of e a s t . A t t h e s u r v e y d e p t h of 479 f t ( b i t d e p t h of 495 f t ) , t h e boreho le was c a l c u l a t e d t o be 16.8 f t west of t h e t a r g e t d e p a r t u r e and 96.0 f t below t a r g e t e l e v a t i o n . Conse- q u e n t l y , i t was dec ided t o abandon t h e b o r e h o l e and t o s i d e t r a c k o r s t a r t a new b o r e h o l e from w i t h i n t h e i n i t i a l boreho le a t a d e p t h of 289 f t . A s w i t h t h e 112" b e n t hous ing , t h e 1' ben t hous ing appar - e n t l y f a i l e d t o g e n e r a t e s u f f i c i e n t s i d e f o r c e t o c o n t r o l boreho le t r a j e c t o r y .

To accommodate t h e s i d e t r a c k a t a d e p t h of 289 f t , enough d r i l l rod was removed f rom t h e boreho le t o p o s i t i o n t h e d r i l l b i t a t a dep th of 275 f t , t o beg in t h e s i d e t r a c k . The s i d e t r a c k i n g procedure h a s been d e s c r i b e d i n a p r e v i o u s Bureau of Mines p u b l i c a t i o n ( 2 ) . - Using t h e i n - h o l e motor equipped w i t h t h e 1" ben t h o u s i n g , t h e s i d e t r a c k was s t a r t e d a t a d e p t h of 275 f t and completed a t a bore- h o l e d e p t h of 289 f t ( f i g . 17). The i n i - t i a l b o r e h o l e was a l s o resurveyed from 89 t o 289 f t , p r i m a r i l y f o r b e a r i n g , a f - t e r r e p l a c i n g a d e f e c t i v e muleshoe and c e n t r a l i z i n g pumpdown washers t h a t were b e l i e v e d t o have caused e r r o r i n measur- i n g b o r e h o l e b e a r i n g ( t a b l e A-2, f i g u r e 13) .

D r i l l i n g of t h e new boreho le resumed f rom 289 f t t o a d e p t h of 385 f t a f t e r t h e 1' hous ing was r e p l a c e d w i t h a 2" h o u s i n g equipped w i t h a s l i p - o n s h o e (po- s i t i o n e d on t h e i n - h o l e motor a t t h e apex of t h e 2' ben t hous ing) ( f i g . 19) . De- s i r e d b o r e h o l e i n c l i n a t i o n and e l e v a t i o n were a t t a i n e d a t a dep th of 329 f t a f t e r o n l y 40 f t of d r i l l i n g w i t h t h e 2' hous- i n g and s l i p - o n shoe and were main ta ined t h e r e a f t e r . By r e f e r r i n g t o t h e a c t u a l b o r e h o l e su rvey l o g and t h e d e s i r e d

boreho le d e p a r t u r e s i n t a b l e A-2, i t can be s e e n t h a t h o r i z o n t a l t r a j e c t o r y was r e t u r n e d t o and c o n t r o l l e d w i t h i n 2 f t of t h e d e s i r e d boreho le d e p a r t u r e ( f i g . 18) . C o n t r o l on both v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l boreho le t r a j e c t o r i e s was accomplished f o r t h e f i r s t t ime because t h e t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s r e s u l t e d i n p r e d i c t a b l e and con- s i s t e n t d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s . While d r i l l i n g w i t h t h e 2" housing and s l ip -on shoe , compared t o t h e p r e v i o u s bent h o u s i n g s , t h e s i d e f o r c e g e n e r a t e d was g r e a t enough t o overcome t h e weak n a t u r e of t h e sand- s t o n e ' s i n t e r g r a n u l a r m a t e r i a l . Although d i r e c t i o n a l c o n t r o l had improved, t h e s l i p - o n shoe f r e q u e n t l y go t s t u c k i n t h e boreho le w h i l e d r i l l i n g , caus ing t h e average p e n e t r a t i o n r a t e t o d e c r e a s e t o 7 in /min from 21 in /min w i t h t h e p r e v i o u s housings . There fo re , a t a dep th of 385 f t , t h e d r i l l rods and in-hole motor were removed from t h e boreho le t o remove t h e s l i p - o n shoe from t h e 2" bent housing.

The demonstra t i o n boreho le was com- p l e t e d t o t h e f i n a l boreho le dep th of 885 f t u s i n g t h e 2' ben t housing wi thou t t h e s l i p - o n shoe ( f i g u r e s 8 and 19). Ac- t u a l d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s were c o n s i s t e n t and p r e d i c t a b l e f o r d i r e c t i o n a l c o n t r o l w i t h t h e 2" housing ( t a b l e 1 ) . The h o r i z o n t a l boreho le t r a j e c t o r y was main ta ined w i t h i n 2 f t e a s t o r west of t h e des igned t r a j e c - t o r y excep t f o r a s h o r t i n t e r v a l around 500 f t ( f i g . 18). Borehole e l e v a t i o n o r v e r t i c a l t r a j e c t o r y i n c r e a s e d a t an a v e r - age r a t e of 1.98 f t p e r 10 f t d r i l l e d , m a i n t a i n i n g a n average boreho le i n c l i n a - t i o n of approximate ly 101.0" t o s u c c e s s - f u l l y i n t e r c e p t t h e d e s i g n a t e d t a r g e t e l e v a t i o n ( f i g . 17).

BOREHOLE PUNCHOUT AND INVESTIGATING ERROR I N AZIMUTH

The a c t u a l demons t ra t ion punchout d e p t h was 885 f t a t e l e v a t i o n 6,047.53, 1.50 f t below t a r g e t c e n t e r and 8.81 f t s o u t h - west of t h e t a r g e t p e r i m e t e r o r 13.81 f t sou thwes t of t a r g e t c e n t e r ( f i g . 20). The t a r g e t e d punchout was t o occur w i t h i n a 5 - f t r a d i u s w i t h c e n t e r c o o r d i n a t e s of N 20,447.31, E 52,709.41 a t e l e v a t i o n 6,049.03 f t . The c a l c u l a t i o n s from t h e NL Sperry-Sun s u r v e y s showed t h e punchout

Page 21: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

TABLE 1. - Measured d e f l e c t i o n r a t e s u s i n g 2" bent hous ing , d e g r e e s p e r f o o t

Tool f a c e s e t t i n g

Righ t : 20" t o 40°..... 40" t o 60°..... 60" t o 80°..... 80" t o 100°.... 100" t o 120°... 120" t o 140°... 140" t o 160°...

L e f t : 0 0 t o 20 o ~ . . . . .

40" t o 60°..... 60" t o 80°..... 80" t o 100°.... 100" t o 120°... 120" t o 140°... 140" t o 160°... NAp Not a p p l i c

Change i n i n c l i n a t i o n ( v e r t i c a l ) l

Range

Change i n b e a r i n g I ( h o r i z o n t a l )

Average

- 0 0 3 t o +.09 - 0 0 1 t o +.06 - 0 1 2 t o +.06 - 0 1 2 t o +.04

NAp -.07 t o - 0 2 0

NAp

Range I Average I

- 0 0 3 +. 05 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 4 - 0 1 3 - 0 1 2 -. 16

.30L- .11R

.52L- .OOR m4OL- .02L m13L- .59L

NAP m53L- 00 1R

NAp ble . ' + I n c r e a s e ( b u i l d u p ) ; - d e c r e a s e (d rop) .

'R Right ( e a s t ) ; L L e f t (wes t ) . 3 ~ e f t t o o l f a c e s e t t i n g s were a p p l i e d from 805- t o 885-ft

boreho le depth . During t h a t d r i l l i n g i n t e r v a l , t h e n e c e s s a r y b i t t h r u s t of >7 ,000 l b was n o t r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e . Conse- q u e n t l y , d r i l l i n g p e n e t r a t i o n r a t e s and d e f l e c t i o n magnitudes dec reased .

t o be a t e l e v a t i o n 6,047.14 f t 1.89 f t below t h e t a r g e t c e n t e r , and a t coord i - n a t e s N 20,439.96, E 52,710.80, 1.4 f t n o r t h e a s t of t h e t a r g e t c e n t e r . The e l e - v a t i o n e r r o r between t h e a c t u a l and c a l - c u l a t e d punchout was 0.39 f t , which was w e l l w i t h i n t h e accuracy of t h e su rvey i n s t r u m e n t . The c o o r d i n a t e e r r o r between t h e a c t u a l and c a l c u l a t e d punchout was 15.20 f t ( f i g u r e s 18 and 20) , which was w i t h i n t h e 1" accuracy of t h e s u r v e y i n - s t r u m e n t i n measur ing bea r ing .

I n v e s t i g a t i o n i n t o c a l c u l a t i n g system- a t i c compass e r r o r caused by d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r f e r e n c e h a s i n d i c a t e d t h a t a p o s s i - b l e e r r o r of 0.30" E was imposed on t h e compass (11) . Applying t h e e q u a t i o n de- ve loped b y ~ l ~ t h e and C a l l a s ( 1 1 ) - f o r e s - t imat i n g compass s p a c i n g ,

C = s i n - ' ( ( F / H ) ( s i n ( 1 ) s i n (EN),

where C = compass c o r r e c t i o n , ",

F = n e t f o r c e s a f f e c t i n g compass, EMU,

H = h o r i z o n t a l component of e a r t h ' s magnet ic f i e l d i n t e n - s i t y (23,300 nT o r 0.0233 EMU a t Navajo Dam, a c c o r d i n g t o t h e Na t iona l Geophysical Data C e n t e r ) ,

I = boreho le i n c l i n a t i o n , 95",

and E = compass r e a d i n g , 350".

Page 22: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

FIGURE 20.-Borehole punchout.

where PL = lower po l e s t r e n g t h , esti- mated a t 100 EMU,

PU = upper po le s t r e n g t h , e s t i - mated a t 1,000 EMU,

DL = compass d i s t a n c e from lower po le , 400 cm,

and DU = compass d i s t a n c e from upper po le , 3,020 cm.

C = -0.30' ( c o r r e c t i o n of 0.30° W).

A f i n a l punchout depar ture of 52,706.16 E was ca l cu l a t ed by applying the compass e r r o r c o r r e c t i o n t o t h e previously sur- veyed borehole bear ings. This depar ture i s 4.61 f t c l o s e r t o t h e a c t u a l punchout a s compared t o not applying t h e compass cor rec t ion . Although caut ion must be used when c a l c u l a t i n g compass c o r r e c t i o n caused by d r i l l s t r i n g i n t e r f e r e n c e , be- cause po le s t r e n g t h s cannot be measured p r e c i s e l y and a r e no t cons tan t , t h e ca l - c u l a t i o n i n t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n ' would have increased borehs le punchout accuracy.

Page 23: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstra t ion borehole was d i r e c - ins t rument . The 2" bent housing was t h e t i o n a l l y d r i l l e d t o a f i n a l d e p t h of 885 most e f f e c t i v e i n main ta in ing d i r e c t i o n a l f t , where punchout occurred. F i n a l bore- c o n t r o l of t h e v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l h o l e e l e v a t i o n was w e l l w i t h i n t h e t a r - boreho le t r a j e c t o r i e s . g e t ; boreho le punchout c o o r d i n a t e s were A s a r e s u l t of t h e demonstrated bore- 8.81 f t southwest of t h e t a r g e t . Bore- h o l e d r i l l i n g accuracy , t h e o r i g i n a l p l a n h o l e s can only be d i r e c t i o n a l l y d r i l l e d of c o n s t r u c t i n g a long t u n n e l under t h e w i t h i n t h e accuracy of t h e boreho le s u r - r i g h t abutment of Navajo Dam and d r i l l i n g vey system used. The NL Sperry-Sun t y p e 150-ft boreholes from i n s i d e t h e t u n n e l B 120" s i n g l e - s h o t d i r e c t i o n a l su rvey i n - t o c o n t r o l wa te r seepage was abandoned. s t rument is a c c u r a t e t o w i t h i n 1" b e a r i n g The Bureau of Reclamation has i n s t e a d and 0.24" i n c l i n a t i o n . The borehole- c o n t r a c t e d t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of a s h o r t e r surveyed punchout, r e l a t i v e t o t h e land- t u n n e l and t h e a c c u r a t e d r i l l i n g of bore- su rveyed a c t u a l punchout, was w i t h i n t h e h o l e s a s long a s 600 f t , r e s u l t i n g i n a accuracy of t h e NL Sperry-Sun survey s u b s t a n t i a l c o s t sav ings t o t h e taxpayer .

REFERENCES

1. Oyle r , D. C . , and W. P. Diamond. D r i l l i n g a H o r i z o n t a l Coalbed Methane Drainage System From a D i r e c t i o n a l Sur- f a c e Borehole. BuMines R I 8640, 1982, 50 PP.

2. K r a v i t s , S. J . , A. S a i n t o , and G. L. F i n f i n g e r . Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques f o r D r i l l i n g H o r i z o n t a l Boreholes i n Coal. BuMines R I 8933, 1985, 33 pp.

3. . The Advantages of In-Hole Motor D r i l l i n g . Coal Min., v. 21, No. 11, 1984, pp. 44-46.

4, E h l e r , W. C. F i n a l Report on In- v e s t i g a t i o n s f o r Seepage C o n t r o l Navajo Dam. U. S. BuReclamation (Dep. I n t e r i o r ) , 1983, 48 pp.

5. P i t t a r d , F. High Torque 2-718-in- OD In-Hole Motor Performance Data. Slim- d r i l Inc . , Houston, TX, 1984, 21 pp.

6. American Petroleum I n s t i t u t e . D i - r e c t i o n a l D r i l l i n g Survey C a l c u l a t i o n

Methods and Terminology. Bul l . D20, Dec. 1985, 31 pp.

7. NL Sperry-Sun (Oklahoma C i t y , OK). Magnetic D i r e c t i o n a l Single-shot Operat- i n g I n s t r u c t i o n s . 1972, 12 pp.

8. Wolff , C. J. M . , and J. P. deWardt. Borehole P o s i t i o n U n c e r t a i n t y Ana lys i s of Measuring Methods and Deriva- t i o n of Sys temat ic E r r o r Model. J. Pet . Technol. , v. 33, 1981, pp. 2339-2350.

9, B ly the , E. J., Jr. E s t i m a t i n g Compass Spacing I n s i d e Nonmagnetic C o l l a r s . D r i l l i n g - DCW, v. 36, 1975, pp. 44-47.

10. F i t c h a r d , E. E. Randomly Simu- l a t e d Borehole T e s t s Accuracy of Direc- t i o n a l Survey Methods. O i l and Gas J. , v. 79, No. 26, 1981, pp. 140-150.

11. B ly the , E. J. , Jr, , and N. P. Cal- l a s . Procedure Improves P l a t f o r m Well Loca t ion Technique. O i l and Gas J., v. 75, No. 18, 1977, pp. 224-232.

Page 24: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

APP

EN

DIX

.--D

RIL

L

AN

D

BORE

HO

LE SU

RVEY

LOGS

TAB

LE

A-1

. -

Log

o

f d

ire

cti

on

al

dri

llin

g p

ara

me

ters

Dat

e.

I Bo

reh

ole

I In

tak

e w

ate

r I

Bi t

I

Bit

1

98

5:

1 de;;h,

Se

pt.

. 1

9..

..

Oct

. :

4.b

..

4.b

..

7.b

..

7.b

..

8..

..

11

.b..

1

9..

..

19

....

20

. . . .

2

0..

..

20

.b..

2

0..

..

22. . . .

22

r 2

2.b

..

22

.b..

2

3..

..

23

.. . .

23

....

2

3..

..

23

....

2

3..

..

23

.,..

2

3..

..

23

.,..

2

4..

..

24

.,..

2

4..

..

24

....

2

4..

..

24

.. ..

rota

tio

n,

r/m

in

torq

ue

, f

tblb

f

NAp

I NA

p I

NAp

1 NAp

1 3-l/Z

-in

re

amed

to

6-i

n

ID.

Su

rvey

ti

me

, m

i n

Lo

st

cir

cu

lati

on

.

Com

men

ts

Co

mp

lete

d

dy

e te

st.

R

egai

ned

c

irc

ula

tio

n.

Lo

st

pa

rtia

l c

irc

ula

tio

n.

Do.

Do

. D

o.

Do .

Do .

Do.

Do

. D

o.

Do .

Re

turn

wa

ter

flo

w

inc

rea

sed

. D

o.

Do .

NAp

Not

a

pp

lic

ab

le.

'~h

ru

st

forc

e =

Th

rust

p

ress

ure

(b

ars

) x

14.7

p

sig

/ba

r x

1.2

68

in

2 (

pis

ton

are

a).

Page 25: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

TAB

LE

A-1

. -

Log

of

d

ire

cti

on

al

dri

llin

g p

aram

eter

s--C

on

tin

ued

Com

men

ts

Re

turn

wa

ter

flo

w

inc

rea

sed

. O

utp

ut

flo

w e

xce

eded

in

pu

t.

Ou

tpu

t fl

ow

>

70

gpm

.

80-g

pm

ou

tflo

w.

Ins

tall

ed

1"

ho

usi

ng

.

Sid

etr

ac

ke

d a

t 28

9 f

t.

Ins

tall

ed

2

" w

ith

sh

oe.

S

urv

ey

ing

pro

ble

ms.

10

0-gp

m

ou

tpu

t.

Rem

oved

sl

ip-o

n

sho

e.

Co

nd

uct

ed

2 s

urv

ey

s.

Da

te,

19

85

Oct

.:

24

.. . .

24. ...

2

5..

..

25

.. . .

25. .. .

25

.. ..

25. .. .

25

.. ..

25. ...

25

. ...

2

5..

..

26

....

3

0..

. .

30

....

3

0..

..

30. ...

N

ov. :

l...

. 4

....

5

....

6

....

6

....

6.

.. .

7..

..

7..

..

7..

..

7..

..

7..

..

8..

..

8..

..

go

...

9..

..

9..

..

9..

..

9..

..

9. ..

. 9

....

9

....

9

....

Bo

reh

ole

d

ep

th,

f t

35

5

36

5

37

5

38

5

39

5

40

5

41

5

42

5

43

5

44

5

45

5

NAp

46

5

47

5

48

5

49

5

NA

p NA

p NA

p 3

05

3

15

3

25

3

35

3

45

3

55

3

65

3

75

3

85

NA

p 3

95

4

05

4

15

4

25

4

35

4

45

4

55

46

5 4

75

Inta

ke

gp

m

67

67

67

67

67

67

65

6

5

68

68

6

8

NAp 63

62

62

6

8

NAp

NAp

NAp 65

66

67

66

66

6

5

69

6

5

67

NAp 68

66

6

5

66

65

66

67

66

66

Bit

ro

tati

on

, r/

min

81

3

81

3

81

3

81

3

81

3

81

3

78

5

785

82

5

82

5

82

5

NAP

746

7 30

7

30

82

5

NA

P N

AP

NAP

78

5

80

0

8 1

3

80

0

80

0

785

83

9

785

81

3

NA

P 8

25

8

00

78

5 8

00

7

85

8

00

8 1

3

80

0

80

0

wa

ter

psi

g

60

0

60

0

60

0

60

0

575

50

0

55

0

500

55

0

62

5

62

5

NAp

65

0

60

0

700

700

NAp

NAp

NAp

65

0

65

0

65

0

65

0

550

60

0

60

0

60

0

550

NAp

500

52

5

550

500

55

0

510

510

60

0

550

Bit

to

rqu

e,

ft0

lbf

11

0

11

0

11

0

11

0

10

0

90

9

5

90

9

5

11

0

110

NAP

11

5

11

0

12

5

12

5

NAP

NA

P NA

P 1

70

17

6 1

78

17

6 17

6 15

6 16

6 1

56

1

48

N

AP

90

9

0

95

9

0

95

9

0

90

11

0 9

5

Th

rust

p

ress

ure

, b

ars

245

245

235

245

250

255

255

250

250

250

250

NA

P 25

0 25

0 25

0 25

0

NAP

NAP

NAP

250

250

250

230

250

260

250

250

260

NAP

260

275

295

290

30

5

300

295

310

300

Th

rust

' fo

rce

, lb

f

4,5

67

4

,56

7

4,3

80

4

,56

7

4,6

60

4

,75

3

4,7

53

4

,66

0

4,6

60

4

,66

0

4,6

60

NA

P 4

,66

0

4,6

60

4

,66

0

4,6

60

NAP

NA

P NA

P 4

,66

0

4,6

60

4

,66

0

4,2

87

4

,66

0

4,8

46

4

,66

0

4,6

60

4

,84

6

NA

P 4

,84

6

5,1

26

5

,49

9

5,4

06

5

,68

5

5,5

92

5

,49

9

5,7

78

5

,59

2

Dr

ill

tim

e,

10

-ft

rod

, m

i n 3

4 3

4

4

4

5

6

3

3

4

NAP 3

3

3

3

NAP

NAP

NAP 2 1

28

1

3

9

13

8

31

2

1

25

NA

P 5

5

4

5

6 5

5

6

5

Su

rvey

ti

me

, m

i n

31

33

1

39

5

7

49

50

35

67

31

40

31

NA

P 42

39

3 1

36

NAp

NAp

NAp 32

47

19

30

30

2

1

32

3 2

30

NAp 23

42

28

45

59

22

26

19

22

Page 26: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

NAp

Not

a

pp

lic

ab

le.

'~h

ru

st

for

ce

= T

hru

st

pre

ssu

re

(ba

rs)

Su

rvey

ing

pro

ble

ms.

C

ond

uct

ed

2 s

urv

eys.

D

o.

Do.

Do.

Do.

Rep

aire

d

surv

ey h

ard

war

e.

Use

d

a w

inch

, +

1,0

00

lb.

Do.

D

o.

Do.

D

o.

Do.

D

o.

Do.

D

o.

Do.

D

o.

Do.

14.7

p

sig

/ba

r x

1.2

68

in

2 (

pis

ton

are

a).

Page 27: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

TAB

LE

A-2

. -

Dem

on

stra

tio

n b

ore

ho

le s

urv

ey

lo

g a

nd

lo

g o

f d

esi

red

de

pa

rtu

res

Bo

re-

ho

le

de

pth

, f

t

NA

P NA

P N

AP

NAP

NAP 65

7

5

85

9

5

10

5

11

5

12

5

13

5

14

5

15

5

16

5

17

5

18

5

19

5

20

5

21

5

22

5

235

24

5

25

5

26

5

27

5

28

5

Azi

mu

th

(un

cor-

re

cte

d),

d

eg

l

NA

P N

AP

35

0.8

1

NA

P NA

P 34

9.50

3

48

.25

34

8.50

35

0.50

35

1.50

3

52

.86

3

50

.70

3

51

.20

35

1.00

34

8.90

34

9.50

34

8.47

35

0.36

34

7.70

3

47

.90

34

8.40

34

8.70

34

8.00

34

5.70

34

7.00

3

45

.50

34

6.30

3

44

.80

Su

rvey

d

ep

th,

ft

0

6

16

26

36

49

59

6

9

79

89

9

9

10

9

119

12

9

13

9

14

9

15

9

16

9

17

9

18

9

19

9

209

219

229

239

249

259

269

Bo

reh

ole

in

cli

- n

ati

on

, d

eg

90.0

8

7.9

8

8.0

8

7.5

88

.9

88.9

8

9.5

90

.0

90.4

90

.9

91.0

91

.4

91.0

90

.5

90.6

90

.7

91.0

91

.5

89.7

89

.2

89

.5

89.9

90

.0

90.1

90

.0

90.0

90

.5

91.1

Cha

nge

in

dep

ar-

ture

s ,

ft

N

AP

NAP

0.3

9

NA

P N

AP

1.24

.1

5

.06

.2

6

.52

.7

3

.66

.5

1

.54

.3

1

.17

.17

.25

.1

8

-.0

3

.03

.l

o

.06

-.

20

-.

29

-.

31

-.

37

-.

43

La

titu

de

, f

t

19

,56

7.6

9

NAp

19

,58

3.6

8

NAp

NAp

19

,61

6.6

4

19

,62

6.6

4

19

,63

6.6

4

19

,64

6.6

3

19

,65

6.6

2

19

,66

6.5

9

19

,67

6.5

7

19

,68

6.5

5

19

,69

6.5

4

19

,70

6.5

3

19

,71

6.5

3

19

,72

6.5

3

19

,73

6.5

2

19

,74

6.5

2

19

,75

6.5

2

19

,76

6.5

2

19

,77

6.5

1

19

,73

6.5

1

19

,79

6.5

1

19

,80

6.5

1

19

,81

6.5

0

19

,82

6.5

0

19

,83

6.4

8

Cha

nge

in

lati

- tu

de

s ,

ft

NA

P NA

P 15

.99

NA

P N

AP

32.9

6 9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.9

8

9.97

9.

97

9.9

8

9.9

8

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

9.99

9.

99

Cha

nge

in t

rue

v

ert

ica

l d

ep

th,

ft

NA

p 0

.11

.3

6

.39

.3

1

019

.14

00

4 -0

03

-0

11

-0

17

-0

21

-.

21

-.

13 -. 10

-01

1

-.1

5

-. 22 -. 10 .lo

.1

1

.05

.0

1

-.0

1

-.0

1

.OO

-0

04

-0

14

Co

rres

- p

on

din

g

de

pth

, f

t4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

12

0

130

140

150

160

170

18

0

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

Tru

e v

ert

ica

l d

ep

th,

ft2

-5,9

33

.53

-5

,93

3.4

2

-5,9

33

.06

-5

,93

2.6

7

-5,9

32

.36

-5

,93

2.1

7

-5,9

32

.03

-5

,93

1.9

9

-5,9

32

.02

-5

,93

2.1

4

-5,9

32

.30

-5

,93

2.5

1

-5,9

32

.72

-5

,93

2.8

5

-5,9

32

.95

-5

,93

3.0

6

-5,9

33

.21

-5

,93

3.4

3

-5,9

33

.53

-5

,93

3.4

4

-5,9

33

.33

-5

,93

3.2

7

-5,9

33

.26

-5

,93

3.2

7

-5,9

33

.28

-5

,93

3.2

8

-5,9

33

.32

-5

,93

3.4

6

Dep

artu

re,

ft

52

,69

7.7

9

NA

P 5

2,6

98

.18

NA

P NA

P 5

2,6

99

.42

5

2,6

99

.57

5

2,6

99

.64

5

2,6

99

.90

5

2,7

00

.42

5

2,7

01

.15

5

2,7

01

.81

5

2,7

02

.33

5

2,7

02

.87

5

2,7

03

.18

5

2,7

03

.35

5

2,7

03

.52

5

2,7

03

.77

5

2,7

03

.95

5

2,7

03

.91

5

2,7

03

.94

5

2,7

04

.04

5

2,7

04

.10

5

2,7

03

.90

5

2,7

03

.61

5

2,7

03

.30

5

2,7

02

.94

5

2,7

02

.51

Des

ired

d

epar

- tu

res

, ft3

52

,69

7.7

9

52

,69

7.4

2

52

,69

8.0

6

52

,69

8.1

9

52

,69

8.3

2

52

,69

8.4

5

52

,69

0.5

8

52

,69

8.7

2

52

,69

8.8

5

52

,69

8.9

8

52

,69

9.1

1

52

,69

9.2

5

52

,69

9.3

8

52

,69

9.5

1

52

,69

9.6

4

52

,69

9.7

8

52

,69

9.9

1

52

,70

0.0

4

52

,70

0.1

7

52

,70

0.3

0

52

,70

0.4

4

52

,70

0.5

7

52

,70

0.7

0

52

,70

0.8

3

52

,70

0.9

6

52

,70

1.1

0

52

,70

1.2

3

52

,70

1.3

6

Page 28: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

See

fo

otn

ote

s a

t en

d

of

tab

le.

Page 29: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

TAB

LE

A-2

. -

De

mo

nst

rati

on

bo

reh

ole

su

rve

y l

og

an

d

log

of

de

sire

d

dep

artu

res-

-Co

nti

nu

ed

Bo

re-

ho

le

de

pth

, f

t

34

5

35

5

36

5

37

5

38

5

39

5

40

5

4 1

5

42

5

43

5

44

5

45

5

46

5

47

5

48

5

49

5

50

5

51

5

52

5

53

5

54

5

55

5

56

5

57

5

58

5

59

5

60

5

61

5

62

5

Bo

reh

ole

in

cli

- n

ati

on

, d

eg

10

0.9

1

00

.4

99

.9

98

.2

10

0.3

1

03

.5

10

2.9

1

00

.9

10

1.0

1

00

.0

10

0.0

1

00

.0

10

0.4

1

01

.3

10

1.9

1

03

.1

10

2.8

1

02

.1

10

2.9

1

03

.5

10

3.5

1

02

.5

10

0.9

1

01

.0

10

0.3

1

00

.7

10

0.8

1

01

.4

10

1.0

Su

rvey

d

ep

th,

ft

32

9

33

9

34

9

35

9

369

37

9

38

9

399

409

419

429

439

449

459

469

479

489

499

50

9

5 1

9

529

539

54

9

559

56

9

579

58

9

59

9

60

9

Azi

mu

th

(un

co

r-

rec

ted

),

de

gl

34

7.9

0

35

2.5

5

34

9.6

0

34

4.4

0

34

7.5

0

35

1.2

0

35

2.5

0

34

6.7

0

34

6.7

0

34

6.8

0

34

6.5

0

34

3.3

0

33

8.1

4

34

0.0

0

34

1.2

0

34

4.8

0

34

6.3

0

34

7.6

0

34

8.7

0

35

0.0

0

35

4.9

0

35

3.3

0

35

2.2

0

35

5.0

0

35

5.1

0

35

3.8

0

35

3.8

0

Cha

nge

in

de

pa

r-

ture

s ,

ft

-0

.46

.3

8

.53

-.

I7

-.3

5

.23

.6

5

.27

-.

22

-.

21

-.

23

- . 5

3

-1.2

5

-1.5

2

-1.2

6

-.8

5

-.4

2

-.I8

.0

3

.23

.7

5

1.0

4

.81

-9

6

1.2

1

1.1

0

.99

.9

4

35

0.5

0

Cha

nge

in

lati

-

tud

es ,

ft

9

.81

9

.82

9

.83

9.

87

9.8

6

9.7

8

9.7

1

9.7

8

9.8

1

9.8

3

9.8

4

9.8

3

9.7

6

9.7

0

9.7

1

9.7

2

9.7

4

9.7

6

9.7

6

9.7

3

9.6

9

9.6

9

9.7

6

9.7

7

9.7

5

9.77

9.

77

9.7

7

9.7

9

Cha

nge

in t

rue

v

ert

ica

l d

ep

th,

ft

-1

.72

-1

.85

-1

.76

-1

.57

-1

.61

-2

.06

-2

.28

-2

.06

-1

.90

-1

.83

-1

.75

-1

.74

-1

.77

-1

.88

-2

.01

-2

.16

-2

.24

-2

.16

-2

.16

-2

.28

-2

.33

-2

.25

-2

.03

-1

.90

-1

.85

- 1

.82

-1

.87

-1

.93

-1

.94

De

pa

rtu

re,

ft

52

,70

3.5

5

52

,70

3.9

3

52

,70

4.4

6

52

,70

4.2

9

52

,70

3.9

3

52

,70

4.1

6

52

,70

4.8

2

52

,70

5.0

9

52

,70

4.8

7

52

,70

4.6

5

52

,70

4.4

2

52

,70

3.8

9

52

,70

2.6

4

52

,70

1.1

1

52

,69

9.8

5

52

,69

9.0

0

52

,68

9.5

8

52

,69

8.4

0

52

,69

8.4

3

52

,69

8.6

5

52

,69

9.4

1

52

,70

0.4

4

52

,70

1.2

6

52

,70

2.2

2

52

,70

3.4

2

52

,70

4.5

2

52

,70

5.5

2

52

,70

6.4

6

52

,70

7.1

2

La

titu

de

, f

t

19

,89

5.9

3

19

,90

5.7

5

19

,91

5.5

8

19

,92

5.4

5

19

,93

5.3

1

19

,94

5.0

9

19

,95

4.8

0

19

,96

4.5

8

19

,97

4.3

9

19

,98

4.2

2

19

,99

4.0

7

20

,00

3.9

0

20

,01

3.6

6

20

,02

3.3

6

20

,03

3.0

7

20

,04

2.8

0

20

,05

2.5

3

20

,06

2.3

0

20

,07

2.0

6

20

,08

1.8

0

20

,09

1.4

9

20

,10

1.1

8

20

,11

0.9

3

20

,12

0.7

0

20

,13

0.4

6

20

,14

0.2

3

20

,15

0.0

0

20

,15

9.7

7

20

,16

9.5

6

Tru

e v

ert

ica

l d

ep

th,

ft

2

-5,9

38

.48

-5

,94

0.3

3

-5,9

42

.09

-5

,94

3.6

7

-5,9

45

.27

-5

,94

7.3

4

-5,9

49

.62

-5

,95

1.6

8

-5,9

53

.58

-5

,95

5.4

1

-5,9

52

.14

-5

,95

8.8

9

-5,9

60

.64

-5

,96

2.5

3

-5,9

64

.54

-5

,96

6.7

1

-5,9

68

.95

-5

,97

1.1

0

-5,9

73

.26

-5

,97

5.5

5

-5,9

77

.88

-5

,98

0.1

3

-5,9

82

.16

-5

,98

4.0

6

-5,9

85

.91

-5

,98

7.7

3

-5,9

89

.60

-5

,99

1.5

2

-5,9

93

.46

De

sire

d

de

pa

r-

ture

s ,

ft

3

52

,70

2.1

4

52

,70

2.2

7

52

,70

2.4

0

52

,70

2.5

3

52

,70

2.6

6

52

,70

2.7

9

52

,70

2.9

2

52

,70

3.0

5

52

,70

3.1

8

52

,70

3.3

1

52

,70

3.4

4

52

,70

3.5

7

52

,70

3.7

0

52

,70

3.8

3

52

,70

3.9

6

52

,70

4.0

9

52

,70

4.2

2

52

,70

4.3

5

52

,70

4.4

8

52

,70

5.6

1

52

,70

5.7

4

52

,70

5.8

7

52

,70

6.0

0

52

,70

6.1

3

52

,70

6.2

6

52

,70

6.3

9

52

,70

6.5

2

52

,70

6.6

5

Co

rre

s-

po

nd

ing

d

ep

th,

ft

4

33

0

340

350

360

37

0

380

39

0

400

410

420

430

440

450

46

0

470

48

0

49

0

500

510

520

530

540

550

560

570

580

59

0

60

0

52

,70

6.7

8

610

Page 30: Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at ... · PDF fileReport of Investigations 9102 Accurate Directional Borehole Drilling: A Case Study at Navajo Dam, New Mexico

635

645

655

665

675

685

595

705

715

725

735

745

755

765

775

785

795

805

815

825

835

845

855

865

875

885

885

YAp

Not

applicable.

Borehole bearing

converted to uncorrected azimuth, radius of curvature calculator program.

Corrects for magnetic

declination (Navajo Dam, add

12'

E in NE quadrant).

Engineering 40 scale used to eliminate reader bias.

*changes to TVD: Up -,

Down

+.

3~og

of desired

departures every

10 ft, collar

to 880 f

t using azimuth of 0.76O.

4~epth

at which desired

departures calculated.

5~orehole terminated at 495 ft, new

borehole sidetracked at 289

ft.

Borehole resurveyed

89 to 279

ft because of

defective survey hardware; used

original surveys 0 to 89 ft.

619

629

639

649

659

669

679

689

699

709

719

729

739

749

759

769

779

789

799

809

819

829

839

849

859

869

885

100.5

100.2

100.8

101.5

100.9

100.2

98.9

99.5

100.1

98.9

99.5

100.1

101.0

102.1

101.4

101.2

100.0

100.1

100.1

101.2

102.2

103.1

103.3

103.8

104.1

104.1

103.8

347.00

347.90

348.70

349.80

350.10

350.70

350.00

349.50

348.40

344.40

344.20

345.00

346.50

350.60

352.10

353.40

347.50

348.40

348.60

350.10

352.80

351.60

348.60

349.70

347.50

347.00

345.60

0.13

-009

005

.2 1

.33

.41

.40

.30

.16

-028

-064

-058

-038

.09

.57

.81

.42

.OO

-009

.23

.59

.71

.36

-19

.lo

-018

-035

-1.86

-1.80

-1.82

-1.93

-1.94

-1.83

-1.66

-1.60

-1.70

-1.65

-1.60

-1.70

-1.83

-2.00

-2.04

-1.96

-1.84

-1.74

-1.75

-1.85

-2.03

-2.19

-2.20

-2.34

-2.41

-3.41

-2.89

9.82

9.84

9.83

9.81

9.80

9.82

9.80

9.87

9.85

9.86

9.85

9.84

9.82

9.79

9.77

9.77

9.82

9.84

9.84

9.82

9.77

9.73

9.73

9.72

9.70

3.68

1.64

52,707.24

52,707.15

52,707.20

52,707.42

52,707.75

52,708.16

52,078.57

52,708.87

52,709.03

52,708.76

52,708.12

52,707.53

52,707.15

52,707.24

52,707.81

52,708.63

52,709.05

52,709.04

52,709.13

52,709.37

52,709.45

52,710.60

52,711.02

52,711.22

52,711.32

52,711.14

52,710.80

52,706.91

52,707.04

52,707.17

52,707.30

52,707.43

52,707.56

52,707.69

52,707.82

52,707.95

52,708.08

52,708.21

52,708.34

52,708.47

52,708.60

52,708.73

52,708.86

52,708.99

52,709.12

52,709.25

52,709.38

52,709.51

52,709.64

52,709.77

52,709.90

52,710.03

52,710.16

52,710.29

20,179.38

20,189.21

20,199.05

20,208.85

20,218.67

20,228.48

20,238.33

20,248.20

20,258.05

20,267.91

20,277.76

20,287.60

20,297.42

20,307.22

20,316.99

20,326.76

20,336.58

20,346.42

20,356.27

20,366.09

20,375.86

20,385.60

20,395.32

20,405.04

20,414.75

20,428.32

20,439.96

620

630

640

650

660

670

680

690

700

710

720

730

740

750

760

770

780

790

800

810

820

830

840

850

860

870

880

-5,955.33

-5,997.12

-5,998.95

-6,000.88

-6,002.82

-6,004.65

-6,006.31

-6,007.91

-6,009.61

-6,011.26

-6,012.86

-6,014.56

-6,016.39

-6,018.40

-6,020.43

-6,022.39

-6,024.23

-6,025.98

-6,027.73

-6,029.58

-6,031.61

-6,033.80

-6,036.08

-6,038.42

-6,040.83

-6,044.24

-6,047.14