Accounting Theory Assign
-
Upload
nana-okyere-boateng -
Category
Documents
-
view
122 -
download
4
Transcript of Accounting Theory Assign
INTRODUCTION
Accounting is the art of collecting, analyzing, recording, summarizing, presenting,
and interpreting financial and operating information for use by management and
other users for decision making purpose.
The primary function of financial accounting is to provide relevant and reliable
financial information to users, both internal and external to the business enterprise.
The focus of financial accounting is on the information needs of investors and
creditors. These users make critical resource allocation decisions that affect the
nation’s economy. The primary means of conveying financial information to
external users is through financial statements and related notes.
For financial statements of businesses to perform their role of helping the external
users to make decisions there must be uniformity in their preparations. This is
normally ensured by accounting standards and principles.
THE NATURE OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Generally accepted accounting principles – standards, as they are sometimes called
consist of the financial accounting and reporting conventions, rules and procedures
that a business enterprise must use in preparing external financial statements that
are subject to audit by an independent certified public accountant (Chasteen et al,
1995).
1
Accounting principles are not like physical laws; they do not exist in nature
awaiting discovery by man. Rather, they are developed by man, in light of what
we consider to be the most important objectives of financial reporting.
Accounting principles are developed in so many ways. Sometimes an accounting
procedure becomes widely used over time by professional accountants. The
organisations responsible for developing accounting principles might recognize
the procedure and include it in Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP).
In other cases accounting standards result from a decision by the rule-making
organisation to adopt one alternative among several methods in practice.
Sometimes the rule-making bodies develop standards based on logic or deductive
reasoning because no clearly defined practices are being used to account for
certain transactions or events.
In many ways the (GAAP) are similar to the rules established for an organized
sport, such as football or basketball. For example, accounting principles, like
sports rules:
Originate from a combination of tradition, experience, and official decree.
Require authoritative support and some means of enforcement.
Are sometimes arbitrary.
May change over time as shortcomings in the existing rules come to light.
Must be clearly understood and observed by all participants in the process.
2
IMPORTANCE
Generally accepted accounting principles help increase the confidence of financial
statement users that the statements are representationally faithful. They provide
companies and accountants who prepare financial statements with guidance on
how to account and report economic activities. And provide independent auditors
of financial statements with a basis for evaluating the fairness and completeness of
the statements.
GAAP are extremely important to independent auditors. An independent auditor’s
(certified public accountant’s) unqualified opinion about a company’s financial
statement asserts that the financial statements fairly present the company’s
financial position, results of operations, and cash flow in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles
Financial accounting and reporting standards require many estimates, assumptions
and professional judgments by management and accountants. Calculations of
depreciation expense and estimates of uncollectible accounts receivable are two
examples. Personal bias, mis-assessment of facts, errors in estimation, and
ambiguity may affect the measurement and communication of economic events.
The potential for such factors to influence financial accounting information is not
surprising when one considers, for example, the significance of accounting
3
information in wage negotiations, management bonuses bank lending decisions,
and other resource allocations.
Financial statements must have credibility to external users. In addition, given
accounting’s service nature, it is essential that the information in financial
statements be useful in decision making. The existence of standards or principles
for accounting and reporting is very important to the credibility and usefulness of
financial data. Without standards to guide accounting and reporting practice, each
accountant would, in effect, have to develop his or her own financial accounting
theory, practices and procedures. Under these circumstances, users of financial
accounting information would find reported information offered little help when
they had to make comparisons among competing uses of scarce resources.
Moreover, without standards, users would have little assurance of the credibility of
reported data. Historically, setting standards for financial accounting and reporting
has proven to be in the public interest.
According to Addo (2007), international accounting standards have the following
importance:
(i) Investors, both individuals and corporate, would be able to compare the
results of different companies internationally as well as nationally in
making investment decisions.
4
(ii) Multinational companies would benefit from international standards for
many reasons including the following.
(1) Better access would be gained to foreign investor funds.
(2) Management control would be improved, because harmonisation
would aid internal communication of financial information.
(3) Appraisal of foreign entities for take-overs and mergers would be
more straightforward.
(4) It would be easier to comply with reporting requirements of oversees
stock exchange.
(5) Preparation of group accounts would be easier.
(6) A reduction in audit costs might be achieved.
(7) Transfer of accounting staff across national borders would be easier.
(iii) Governments of development countries would save time and money if
they could adopt international standards and, if these were used
internally, governments of developing countries could attempt to control
the activities of foreign multinational companies in their own country.
These companies could not ‘hide’ behind foreign accounting practices
which are difficult to understand.
(iv) It would be easier to calculate the tax liability of investors, including
multinationals who receive income from overseas sources.
5
(v) Regional economic groups usually promote trade within specific
geographical region. This would be aided by common accounting
practices within the region.
(vi) Large international accounting firms would benefit as accounting and
auditing would be much easier if similar accounting practices existed
through out the world.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS OVERLOAD
As mentioned earlier accounting standards are the regulatory framework that
governs the preparation of periodic financial statements of business organisations.
There are several of such standards in Ghana and international world. Each
industry seems to have its own regulatory document. In Ghana mention can be
made of such legislation as the Ghana National Accounting Standards, the
Companies Code 1963, Act 179, and the Incorporated Private Partnership Act,
1962, Act 152. Other legislations governing the financial reporting include the
following:
(i) Securities Industry Law, 1993 (PNDCL 333)
(ii) Securities Industry (Amendment) Act, 2000 (Act 590)
(iii) Banking Law, 1989 (PNDCL 225)
(iv) Insurance Law, 1989 (PNDCL 227)
(v) Ghana Investment Promotion Centre Act, 1994 Act 478)
(vi) Free Zones Act, 1995 (Act 504)
6
(vii) Internal Revenue Act, 2000 (Act 592)
(viii) Stock Exchange (Ghana Stock Exchange Listing Regulations 1990), (LI
1509)
(ix) Stock Exchange (Ghana Stock Exchange Membership Regulations,
1991) (LI 1510) as amended (1993)
(x) Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation 2003 (LI 1728).
Each of these frameworks sometimes gives contrasting views of how certain items
must be treated.
Accounting principles also somewhat vary from country to country. The phrase
“generally accepted accounting principles” (GAAP) refers to the accounting
concepts in the United States. Great Britain and many other countries also have
their own standards. Great Britain, for instance, uses the Statement of Standard
Accounting Practice (SSAP). Even though these standards from different countries
have many things in common they sometimes differ in the way certain items are
treated. For instance in Germany, the amortization period for an intangible asset is
five years. In the United States, a maximum period of forty years is allowed. In the
Netherlands, assets are valued at their economic worth or replacement value. In
the United States, assets are generally valued at historical cost. In Japan, income
smoothing is permitted because firms are allowed discretionary charges to income
for such items as depreciation and bad debts. In the United States, arbitrary
7
charges to income are not permitted. These are just some of the ways in which
reporting practices in the United States differ from reporting practices in other
countries (Kieso et al, 1987).
Because these differences exist, it is often difficult to make comparisons among
enterprises. Many believe that this lack of standardisation inhibits the free flow of
capital across borders and often prompts international investors to demand
unnecessary risk premiums. In addition, many contend that differences in
reporting standards can lead to unfair competitive advantages.
Most companies recognize the need for more uniform standards. As a result, the
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was formed in 1973 to
attempt to narrow the areas of divergence. Because the objectives of financial
reporting in the United States often differ from those in other countries, the
institutional structures are often not comparable, and strong national tendencies are
pervasive, such narrowing will not be easy.
DEFINITION OF ACCOUNTING THEORY
Accounting theory may be defined as a logical reasoning in the form of a set of
broad principles that (1) provide a general frame of reference by which accounting
practice can be evaluated, and (2) guide the development of new practices and
procedures. Accounting theory may also be used to explain the existing practices
8
to obtain a better understanding of them. But the most important goal of
accounting theory should be to provide a coherent set of logical principles that
form the general frame of reference for the evaluation and development of sound
accounting practices (Hendriksen, 1992).
APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING THEORY
The complex nature of accounting phenomena and issues results in the fact that no
single methodology of accounting will be sufficient in finding solutions to
accounting problems. Consequently, the choice of the most appropriate theory
depends of how well it supports the development of procedures and techniques
that best fulfill the objectives of accounting. Since there is no single
comprehensive theory of accounting, various accounting theories of a middle
range have resulted from the use of different approaches. Some of the
methodological techniques or approaches to the development of accounting
theory, which are known as the traditional approaches, include the following:
Deductive, Inductive, Ethical, Behavioral, Sociological and Welfare approaches
Deductive Approach
The deductive approach to the development of accounting theory starts with the
proposition or postulates and derives logical conclusions about the situation. When
used in accounting, this approach starts with the basic premises and then makes
9
accounting principles out of them. The deductive approach starts from the general
to the specific situation. The steps used in developing accounting theory by this
approach are as follows:
(1) Specifying the objective of financial statements.
(2) Selecting the “postulates” of accounting.
(3) Deriving the “principles” of accounting.
(4) Developing the “techniques” of accounting.
The formulation of objectives is very important in the deductive approach because
different objectives might require entirely different structures and result in
different principles and techniques. Essentially, accounting theory should be
flexible enough to provide the needs of different objectives but rigid enough to
provide for some uniformity and consistency in financial reporting to shareholders
and the general public.
Inductive Approach
The inductive approach to the development of accounting theory begins with
observations and measurement and move towards generalized conclusions. When
used in the development of accounting theory, the inductive approach stars with
the making of observations about financial information of an enterprise and moves
on to the construction of generalizations and principles of accounting. This
approach starts from the particular to the general. The inductive approach to the
development of accounting theory involves the following four stages:
10
(1) Recording all observations.
(2) Analysis and classifications of these observations to detect recurring
relationships (“likes” and “similarities”).
(3) Inductive derivation of generalizations and principles of accounting
from observation that depict recurring relationships.
(4) Testing the generalizations
Through this process, new ideas and principles can be derived, particularly if the
observer does not let himself to be influenced by current principles and practices.
The advantage of the inductive approach is that it is not necessarily constrained by
a preconceived model or structure. The researcher is free to make any observation
he may deem relevant. But once generalizations or principles are formulated, they
should be confirmed by the logical process of the deductive approach.
CONCLUSION
To sum up, accounting standards can be described as the guidelines that have been
developed to govern financial reporting of companies. They are not discovered but
developed to meet the needs of society. Accounting standards are important
because they provide financial statements with uniformity, comparability, and
credibility. However, accounting standards overload has made the presentation of
financial statements quite difficult. Ghana’s adoption of the IFRS is a good step
towards the rationalisation of its standards to meet international requirements.
11
Accounting theory may be developed through several approaches including the
deductive and inductive approaches. The deductive approach starts from the
general and moves to the specific while the inductive approach starts from the
specific and moves to the general.
12
REFERENCES
Kieso, E.D. and Weygandt, J.J. (1983) Intermediate Accounting, 4th ed., New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
Kieso, E.D. and Weygandt, J.J. (1987) Intermediate Accounting, 6th ed., New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
Chasteen, G.L., Flaherty, E.R., and O’Connor, C.M. (1995) Intermediate Accounting, 5th
ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hendrksen, E.S. (1982) Accounting Theory, 4th ed., Richard D. Irwin.
Hermanson, R.H., Edwards, J.D., and Maher, W.M. (1992) Accounting Principles, 5th ed.,
Boston: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
Meigs, F.R., Meigs, A.M., Betner, M. and Whittington, R. (1996) Accounting The Basis
for Business Decisions, 10th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
13