Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1989.pdf · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability...
25
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession Ruth D. Hines, Article information: To cite this document: Ruth D. Hines, (1989) "Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Issue: 2, https:// doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268 Downloaded on: 18 August 2017, At: 20:42 (PT) References: this document contains references to 0 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 21177 times since 2006* Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: (1989),"The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 1 pp. - <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671">https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671</a> (1989),"Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the UK Accountancy Profession.", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 2 pp. - <a href="https:// doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132286">https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132286</a> Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by All users group For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW At 20:42 18 August 2017 (PT)
Transcript of Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1989.pdf · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability...
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability JournalFinancial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of theAccounting ProfessionRuth D. Hines,
Article information:To cite this document:Ruth D. Hines, (1989) "Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the SocialConstruction of the Accounting Profession", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Issue: 2, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268Permanent link to this document:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268
Downloaded on: 18 August 2017, At: 20:42 (PT)References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.To copy this document: [email protected] fulltext of this document has been downloaded 21177 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:(1989),"The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,Vol. 2 Iss 1 pp. - <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671">https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671</a>(1989),"Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the UKAccountancy Profession.", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 2 pp. - <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132286">https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132286</a>
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by All users group
For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors serviceinformation about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visitwww.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio ofmore than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of onlineproducts and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on PublicationEthics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
This article has been cited by:
1. Marcia Annisette. 2017. Discourse of the professions: The making, normalizing and taming of Ontario's “foreign-trainedaccountant”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 60, 37-61. [Crossref]
2. Antoine C. M. van den Bogaart, Harmen Schaap, Hans G. K. Hummel, Paul A. Kirschner. 2017. Combining concept mapsand interviews to produce representations of personal professional theories in higher vocational education: effects of orderand vocational domain. Instructional Science 45:3, 359-376. [Crossref]
3. Antoine C. M. van den Bogaart, Hans G. K. Hummel, Paul A. Kirschner. 2017. Explicating development of personalprofessional theories from higher vocational education to beginning a professional career through computer-supporteddrawing of concept maps. Professional Development in Education 1-15. [Crossref]
4. Ian Thomson. 2017. Commentary: A theoretical model of stakeholder perceptions of a new financial reporting system.Accounting Forum . [Crossref]
5. Phil Hancock, Neil Marriott, Angus Duff. 2017. Research-teaching yin-yang? An empirical study of accounting and financeacademics in Australia and New Zealand. Accounting & Finance . [Crossref]
6. 2016. Commentary: A theoretical model of stakeholder perceptions of a new financial reporting system. Accounting Forum40:4, 319-321. [Crossref]
7. Stefano Zambon, Laura Girella. 2016. Accounting Theory and Accounting Practice as Loosely Coupled Systems: A HistoricalPerspective on the Italian Case (1930-1990). FINANCIAL REPORTING :1, 95-133. [Crossref]
8. Moataz Moamen Elmassri, Elaine Pamela Harris, David Bernard Carter. 2016. Accounting for strategic investment decision-making under extreme uncertainty. The British Accounting Review 48:2, 151-168. [Crossref]
9. Brian A. Rutherford. 2016. Articulating accounting principles. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 17:2, 118-135. [Abstract][Full Text] [PDF]
10. Kevin Ow Yong, Chu Yeong Lim, Pearl Tan. 2016. Theory and practice of the proposed conceptual framework: Evidencefrom the field. Advances in Accounting . [Crossref]
11. Prem W. Senarath Yapa, Kerry Jacobs, Bopta Chan Huot. 2016. The field of accounting. Accounting, Auditing & AccountabilityJournal 29:3, 401-427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
12. M. Nur A. Birton, Iwan Triyuwono, Aji Dedi Mulawarman, Aulia Fuad Rahman. 2015. Theory of Shariahization onConceptual Accounting Framework: A Substantive Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 211, 723-730. [Crossref]
13. Arjan Brouwer, Martin Hoogendoorn, Ewout Naarding. 2015. Will the changes proposed to the conceptual framework'sdefinitions and recognition criteria provide a better basis for IASB standard setting?. Accounting and Business Research 45:5,547-571. [Crossref]
14. Christine Cooper. 2015. Accounting for the fictitious: A Marxist contribution to understanding accounting's roles in thefinancial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 30, 63-82. [Crossref]
15. Dwiyani Sudaryanti, Eko G. Sukoharsono, Zaki Baridwan, Aji D. Mulawarman. 2015. Critical Analysis on AccountingInformation Based On Pancasila Value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172, 533-539. [Crossref]
16. Deviraj Gill and, Anne Broderick. Brand Heritage and CSR Credentials: A Discourse Analysis of M&S Reports 179-199.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
17. Fábio Frezatti, David B. Carter, Marcelo F.G. Barroso. 2014. Accounting without accounting. Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal 27:3, 426-464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. Ying Zhang, Jane Andrew. 2014. Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25:1,17-26. [Crossref]
19. Thomas A Lee. 2013. Reflections on the origins of modern accounting. Accounting History 18:2, 141-161. [Crossref]20. Marion Davis, David Hay. 2012. An Analysis of Submissions on Proposed Regulations for Audit and Assurance in New
Zealand. Australian Accounting Review 22:3, 303-316. [Crossref]21. Kevin Clarke, Jack Flanagan, Sharron O'Neill. 2012. Success in winning Australian Research Council grants as a measure of
comparative professionalised disciplinary research activity. Pacific Accounting Review 24:1, 51-79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]22. Eva Heidhues, Chris Patel. Chapter 4 The Influence of Power and Legitimacy on German Attitudes Toward the IASB and
the Promotion of Professional Judgments 75-122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]23. . References 163-196. [Citation] [PDF] [PDF]24. James Guthrie, Lee D. Parker. 2011. Reflections and projections. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25:1, 6-26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]25. Crawford Spence, David Carter. 2011. Accounting for the General Intellect: Immaterial labour and the social factory. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 22:3, 304-315. [Crossref]
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
26. Ian Dennis. 2010. ‘Clarity’ Begins at Home: An Examination of the Conceptual Underpinnings of the IAASB's ClarityProject. International Journal of Auditing 14:3, 294-319. [Crossref]
27. Henri Guénin-Paracini, Yves Gendron. 2010. Auditors as modern pharmakoi: Legitimacy paradoxes and the production ofeconomic order. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21:2, 134-158. [Crossref]
28. Ian Dennis. 2009. What Do You Expect? A Reconfiguration of the Audit Expectations Gap. International Journal of Auditing. [Crossref]
29. William E. Shafer, Richard S. Simmons. 2008. Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing& Accountability Journal 21:5, 695-720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
30. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accountingand Business Research 37:1, 59-61. [Crossref]
31. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accountingand Business Research 37:1, 39-54. [Crossref]
32. Sylvain Durocher, Anne Fortin, Louise Côté. 2007. Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32:1-2, 29-59. [Crossref]
33. Marcia Annisette, Linda M. Kirkham. 2007. The advantages of separateness explaining the unusual profession-university linkin English Chartered Accountancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 18:1, 1-30. [Crossref]
34. INDRA ABEYSEKERA. 2006. Accounting Meets Politics: Theoretical Interpretation of Key Events (1940-2003) of theAccounting Profession in Australia. Australian Accounting Review 16:40, 66-74. [Crossref]
35. Derek Matthews. 2006. The development of British accountancy in the nineteenth century: A technological deterministapproach. Business History 48:4, 501-528. [Crossref]
36. Craig Deegan, Christopher Blomquist. 2006. Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interactionbetween WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31:4-5, 343-372.[Crossref]
37. Ngaire Kirk. 2006. Perceptions of the true and fair view concept: an empirical investigation. Abacus 42:2, 205-235. [Crossref]38. James Guthrie, Indra Abeysekera. 2006. Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new?. Journal of Human
Resource Costing & Accounting 10:2, 114-126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]39. T.A. Lee. 2006. The war of the sidewardly mobile corporate financial report. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 17:4, 419-455.
[Crossref]40. Indra Abeysekera. 2005. Accounting: in crisis or ascendancy?. Accounting History 10:3, 71-87. [Crossref]41. Bradley N. Potter. 2005. Accounting as a social and institutional practice: perspectives to enrich our understanding of
accounting change. Abacus 41:3, 265-289. [Crossref]42. Thomas B. Lawrence. 2004. Rituals and Resistance: Membership Dynamics in Professional Fields. Human Relations 57:2,
115-143. [Crossref]43. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The epistemology of macroeconomic reality: The Keynesian Revolution from an accounting point of
view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28:5, 471-517. [Crossref]44. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas.
Accounting, Organizations and Society 28:1, 65-95. [Crossref]45. Brian P. West. 2001. On the social history of accounting: The Bank Auditby Bruce Marshall. Accounting History 6:1, 11-30.
[Crossref]46. Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam, Juliet Roper. Applying critical discourse analysis: Struggles over takeovers legislation in New
Zealand 121-155. [Abstract] [Enhanced Abstract] [PDF] [PDF]47. Fran M. Wolf, James A. Tackett, Gregory A. Claypool. 1999. Audit disaster futures: antidotes for the expectation gap?.
Managerial Auditing Journal 14:9, 468-478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]48. Brad Potter. 1999. The power of words: explaining recent accounting reforms in the Australian public sector. Accounting
History 4:2, 43-72. [Crossref]49. Keith Robson. 1999. SOCIAL ANALYSES OF ACCOUNTING INSTITUTIONS: ECONOMIC VALUE,
ACCOUNTING REPRESENTATION AND THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Critical Perspectives on Accounting10:5, 615-629. [Crossref]
50. Maria Cadiz Dyball, Lina J. Valcarcel. 1999. The “rational” and “traditional”: the regulation of accounting in the Philippines.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12:3, 303-328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
51. Jane Andrew. 1999. Measurement and Imperialism in the ‘New Millennium’. Pacific Accounting Review 11:1/2, 23-27.[Abstract] [PDF]
52. David Coy, Michael Pratt. 1998. An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Accounting, Auditing& Accountability Journal 11:5, 540-561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
53. John Innes, Tom Brown, David Hatherly. 1997. The expanded audit report ‐ a research study within the development ofSAS 600. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:5, 702-717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
54. Brian P. West. 1996. The professionalisation of accounting. Accounting History 1:1, 77-102. [Crossref]55. Tom Lee. 1995. The professionalization of accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8:4, 48-69. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]56. Mark Shying. 1995. INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CULTURE AND ACCOUNTANTS'
PERCEPTIONS OF PROFESSIONALISM. Asian Review of Accounting 3:2, 58-69. [Abstract] [PDF]57. Timothy J. Fogarty, Mohamed E.A. Hussein, J. Edward Ketz. 1994. Political Aspects of Financial Accounting Standard
Setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:4, 24-46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]58. Irene Tutticci, Keitha Dunstan, Scott Holmes. 1994. Respondent Lobbying in the Australian Accounting Standard‐setting
Process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:2, 86-104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]59. Tom Lee. 1994. Financial Reporting Quality Labels. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:2, 30-49. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]60. Timothy J. Fogarty. 1992. Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: Constraints, opportunities
and dilemmas. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 11:4, 331-355. [Crossref]61. Linda M Kirkham. 1992. Putting auditing practices in context: deciphering the message in auditor responses to selected
environmental cues. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3:3, 291-314. [Crossref]62. Christopher Humphrey, Peter Moizer, Stuart Turley. 1992. The audit expectations gap—plus ca change, plus c'est la meme
chose?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3:2, 137-161. [Crossref]63. Richard Laughlin. 1991. Can the information systems for the NHS internal market work?. Public Money & Management
11:3, 37-41. [Crossref]64. Hugh Willmott. 1991. The auditing game: A question of ownership and control. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2:1,
109-121. [Crossref]65. Tony Tinker. 1991. The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16:3, 297-310. [Crossref]66. Robin Roslender. 1990. Sociology and management accounting research. The British Accounting Review 22:4, 351-372.
[Crossref]67. Christopher Humphrey, Peter Moizer. 1990. From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1:3, 217-238. [Crossref]68. Marilyn Neimark. 1990. The king is dead. Long live the king!. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1:1, 103-114. [Crossref]
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y O
F G
LA
SGO
W A
t 20:
42 1
8 A
ugus
t 201
7 (P
T)
![Brennan, Niamh M. and Solomon, Jill [2008] Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21 (7)](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/54471d13afaf9f5d178b48e1/brennan-niamh-m-and-solomon-jill-2008-corporate-governance-accountability-and-mechanisms-of-accountability-an-overview-accounting-auditing-and-accountability-journal-21-7-september-885-906.jpg)
![Brennan, Niamh M. and Solomon, Jill [2008] Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7)(September):](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/577ce4911a28abf1038e9d03/brennan-niamh-m-and-solomon-jill-2008-corporate-governance-accountability.jpg)
