Academic promotion to Levels C, D and E Round 2, 2011 Academic Promotions Unit.
-
Upload
teresa-gallagher -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Academic promotion to Levels C, D and E Round 2, 2011 Academic Promotions Unit.
Academic promotion to Levels C, D and E
Round 2, 2011
Academic Promotions Unit
Requirements for academic promotion
You must meet:
The qualification requirement
– PhD or equivalent qualification OR
– Significant expertise, standing and research or scholarship within the discipline and/or profession
You must have the support of both your Head of School and Pro Vice-Chancellor if you are applying for academic
promotionwithout a PhD or equivalent
Requirements for academic promotion
3 promotion criteria
Choose 3 criteria from choice of 4 – Teaching & Learning, Research/Creative works, Leadership, Service
– 1 criterion to be assessed on:• High level of performance in duties of current level only
– 2 criteria to be assessed on:• High level of performance in duties of current level and• Satisfactory performance in duties of level above
• 1 criterion to be assessed at current level and above must be Teaching & Learning OR Research/Creative works
If the promotion criteria does not apply to your job:– Apply for consideration for special case promotion
Putting your caseFirst step is to address your readiness, talk to
your Head of School
Prepare your application:
• Application form
• CV
• Selected eVALUate reports – if applicable– Teaching Evaluation Reports (TERs)– Unit Summary Reports (USRs)
• List of assessors (for Academic Promotions Unit only)
Submitting your application
By closing date:
• WinZip application and email to Academic Promotions Unit
• Send assessor report form and documentation to assessors (and Dean/s where appropriate)
Applications will not be considered by theCommittee if they are late, incomplete or do not conform to the application
requirements
Application form and CVApplicant details
Promotion criteria and levels
Qualifications
Recent duties at Curtin• Unit co-ordination• Teaching• Supervision• Research/creative works• Service• Leadership roles
Statements against criteria strictly 1 page onlyLevel E only- Statements against criteria strictly 2 pages only
Checklist and declaration
CV – maximum 6 pages plus publications list and grantsLevel E only-10 pages plus publications list and grants
Assessors
Independently assess the quality of your work
HOS and PVC assess all applications
You select 1 – 3 additional assessors• Each criterion addressed in your application
must be assessed by at least 1 assessor• An assessor can assess 1 or more criteria
Level E only – Deans choose 2 Faculty-nominated assessors
Choosing and contacting assessors
Choose carefully• Do your assessors know your work in the area you have
asked them to assess?• Are they of an appropriate standing/knowledge
base/experience to make a judgement?• Can they represent disciplinary/professional norms for
the Committee and compare your work to these?
Gain consent for the assessment
Help your assessors• Send them a copy of your application• Provide them with evidence e.g. course materials,
research papers, awards, evaluations
Submitting assessor reports
Applicant-nominated assessor reports are submitted directly to the Unit
• We notify you as each report comes in
HOS and PVC submit their assessor reports to Unit• We forward them to you for possible response• You send response to Unit by due date (if
applicable)
All assessor reports except HOS and PVC reports are submitted in confidence
Faculty-nominated assessors (Level E only)
Assess Teaching & Learning and Research where you have nominated those criteria at current level and the level above
Contact Dean Teaching & Learning and/or Research to choose a Faculty-nominated assessor
Deans submit Faculty-nominated assessor details to Unit confidentially
We contact Faculty-nominated assessors
They send their reports directly to Unit in confidence
Interim stages
Applications are checked to ensure:
• Qualification requirement is met• Teaching & Learning or Research addressed at
current level and above• Application is complete• Application only contains material indicated in the
Guidelines• Each criterion addressed is assessed by at least 1
assessor• Note: Applications wont proceed to the
promotions committee if they are incomplete late or don’t conform to Guidelines
You need to be contactable
Top tips
• Read the information on the Academic Promotions website
• Contact the Academic Promotions Unit if you have a query
• Use the round specific Guidelines and forms
• Check details e.g. specify criteria at the correct levels on both the front page of application and statements against criteria
• Remember to sign and date forms
• Ask Head of School for HOS assessor report (not Head of Department)
• Do not submit eVALUate Full Unit Reports
• Make sure all 3 criteria are covered by at least 1 applicant-nominated assessor
ORD research report
Office of Research & Development (ORD) provides verified/audited information for each applicant on:
• Four years of RPI data by category for RPI rounds that have been completed (i.e. finalised awards post-appeal)
• Research publication list and summary (by category) of VERIFIED publications on SCRIPT
• Successful grants on SCRIPT Research Projects in which the applicant is a named investigator
Ensuring an accurate ORD research report
It is your responsibility to:
• Ensure your activity within the SCRIPT system is up to date
• Enter information onto SCRIPT correctly
• Notify ORD of information requiring verification
• Supply all necessary evidence to ORD by the closing date for applications
Research activity – the complete picture
Committee will also consider the additional research and scholarship information provided in your:
• CV
• Statements against the criteria
• Assessor reports
Final stages
• Committee meets to assess applications• Vice-Chancellor is notified of Committee’s
recommendations for approval• Staff are notified of the outcome• Unsuccessful applicants and their HOS and
PVC are provided with feedback on the:– Strengths– Weaknesses– Improvements required
• Effective promotion date for successful applicants is 1 January 2012
Promotion criteria
Excellence in teaching and learning as applied to duties of the appropriate level
High quality outcomes appropriate to the discipline in research/creative works as applied to duties of the appropriate level
Leadership that impacts positively on Curtin’s strategic directions as applied to duties of the appropriate level
Demonstrated excellence in service in line with Curtin’s strategic directions as applied to duties of the appropriate level
Teaching & Learning dutiesExcellence in teaching and learning as applied to duties of the
appropriate level
Level Types of duties may include
E Distinguished scholarship and contribution in teaching and learning at all levels, nationally or internationally; Maintenance of academic standards AND
D Development of curriculum / programs of study; Significant scholarship in teaching and learning locally or nationally AND
C Course / Year / Program co-ordination; Scholarship in teaching and learning AND
B Undergraduate and postgraduate unit co-ordination; Postgraduate lecturing, tutoring, demonstrating, clinical supervision, fieldwork and associated activities AND
A Undergraduate lecturing, tutoring, demonstrating, clinical supervision, fieldwork and associated activities.
Scholarship in Teaching
Applicants applying for promotion on the basis of teaching are expected to be engaged in the scholarship of teaching.
Scholarship refers to research on, evaluation of
or reflection on teaching and learning that results in improvement to practice. It includes communicating good practice to others.
Research/Creative Works dutiesHigh quality outcomes appropriate to the discipline in research/creative
works as applied to duties of the appropriate level
Level Types of duties may include
E Responsible for research/creative works of a recognised international calibre/a leading authority; Fostering research of others AND
D Responsible for research/creative works of a recognised national calibre AND
C Supervision of Hons, Masters and PhD research projects AND
B Conducting research/creative works
A Conducting research/creative works
Leadership dutiesLeadership that impacts positively on Curtin’s strategic directions as
applied to duties of the appropriate level
Level Types of duties may include
E Management/leadership of a large organisational unit, a University-wide initiative, policy development, community affairs, excellence in teaching/research; international recognition; capacity building AND
D Management/leadership of an organisational unit, a large team, a Faculty-wide initiative; Mentoring of colleagues AND
C Management/leadership of a team, a School-wide initiative, a course, a year group; Mentoring of students AND
B Management/leadership of teaching units, sessional staff AND
A Development of own teaching/research/professional expertise/creative works
Service dutiesDemonstrated excellence in service in line with Curtin’s strategic
directions as applied to duties of the appropriate level
Level Types of duties may include
E Significant service to both the University and the community AND
D Significant service to the University, profession, discipline AND
C Service to the profession, the Faculty AND
B Service to the academic unit and its functioning AND
A Service to own areas of teaching/research
Excellence in duties of current levelSatisfactory performance in duties of level
aboveAcademic Promotions Guidelines• Assessments against the evidence• Curtin Expectations for Academic Performance (CEAP)
including RPI tables
Promotion criteria information on Academic Promotions webpage
Key performance targets in the University, Faculty and School plans http://planning.curtin.edu.au/strategic/plans.cfm
Typical research performance of the area http://research.curtin.edu.au
Faculty and University eVALUate results are available at http://evaluate.curtin.edu.au/index.cfm
Statements against the criteria
Evidence based
Focus on your achievements, contributions, outcomes and outputs
Separate evidence for excellence in duties of current level from evidence for satisfactory performance in duties of level above where possible
Separate achievements in different spheres of influencee.g. School/Faculty/University/national/international
Addressing the promotion criteria
Some duties will be relevant to more than one criterion
You may use different aspects of a duty in different criteria
You cannot use the same activity as evidence in more than one criterion
Academic Promotions website http://hr.curtin.edu.au/academic_promotio
n.cfm
Academic Promotions Unit
Dr Jane Scott, Executive Officer
Ms Allie Rogers, Academic Promotions Officer
Ms Carrissa Lloyd, Administration Officer
Email: [email protected]
Useful contacts
Academic Promotions UnitAllie Rogers, Academic Promotions Officer Phone: 9266 4318Email: [email protected]
ORD research reportDr Melinda Thompson, Manager Research Operations, Office of Research &
DevelopmentEmail: [email protected] Phone: 9266 7112
SCRIPTOffice of Research and DevelopmentEmail: http://research.curtin.edu.au/guides/script.cfm
eVALUateBeatrice Tucker, Manager Evaluation, Office of Teaching and LearningEmail: [email protected] Phone: 9266 1092
EEOAmanda Willis, Director, Corporate Values and EquityEmail: [email protected] Phone: 9266 2772