ACAC Study 16 September 2005 1 ACAC Study of ATM-CNS Presentation at ACAC Seminar 2005 in Rabat by...
-
Upload
melvin-clarke -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of ACAC Study 16 September 2005 1 ACAC Study of ATM-CNS Presentation at ACAC Seminar 2005 in Rabat by...
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 1
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Presentationat
ACAC Seminar 2005 in Rabatby
Michel [email protected]
FromSOFREAVIA
Consulting and Support Studies
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 2
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
Overall Study Presentation
Training issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Institutional issues
ACAC Roadmap
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 3
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSOverall study approach
WP1: Data Collection & forecast evolutions
Data collection
Traffic AnalysisService Evolution
Scenarios
Airspace Organisation Scenario
WP2: CNS Implementation Issues
Foreseen CNS Services
ATC & CNS Infrastructure Scenario
Aircraft Equipment Requirements
WP3: Training needs
Assessment of staffing needs
Identification of training needs
Training Program and Cost
WP4: Cost Benefit Analysis
Equipment Costs Training Costs
Assessment of operational benefits
WP6: Implementation
Roadmap
Deployment
Program
Training
Program
Consolidated CBA ATM/CNS Roadmap
WP5: Institutional issues
Analysis of existing arrangements
Recommended approach
Schedule for new framework
Phase 1
Phase 2
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 4
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSApproach for Phase 1 (1/2)
WP1: Data Collection & forecast evolutions
Data collection
Traffic AnalysisService Evolution
Scenarios
Airspace Organisation Scenario
Traffic data &growth rate forecast
Data on services & infrastructure
Route network & airspace structure
Typology ofservice areas
Optimisednetwork &airspace
Traffic &fleet data
Fleet
data
Questionnaire
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 5
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSApproach for Phase 1 (2/2)
WP2: CNS Implementation Issues
Foreseen CNS Services
ATC & CNS Infrastructure Scenario
Aircraft Equipment Requirements
ATM ServicesWP1
Regional & National Plans
Existing InfrastructureWP1
Aircraft CNSequipment
ATS CNSequipment
Concept ofoperation forATM/CNS
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 6
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSApproach for Phase 2 (1/3)
WP3: Training needs
Assessment of staffing needs
Identification of training needs
Training Program and Cost
WP5: Institutional issues
Analysis of existing arrangements
Recommended approach
Schedule for new framework
Staffing data fromquestionnaires
ATC service leveland forecast numbers
of sectors from phase 1
information fromquestionnaires
Input for WP4 (CBA) Input for WP6 (Roadmap)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 7
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSStudy approach for Phase 2 (2/3)
WP4: Cost Benefit Analysis
Equipment Costs Training Costs
Assessment of operational benefits
Consolidated CBA
Input on cost from WP3
CNS-ATM Agendafrom phase 1
Consolidation ofservices and priorities
ACAC fleetfrom phase 1
Forecast trafficfrom phase 1
Agendarevisionsfor WP6
Current classicalequipment
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 8
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSStudy approach for Phase 2 (3/3)
WP6: ImplementationRoadmap
Deployment
ProgramTraining
Program
ATM/CNS Roadmap
Input on schedule from WP3
CNS-ATM Agendafrom phase 1
Agenda
revisionsfrom WP4
Input on schedule from WP5
Synch.
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 9
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
Overall Study Presentation
Training issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Institutional issues
ACAC Roadmap
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 10
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSHuman Resource in CNS-ATM transition
This aspect is addressed in 4 steps:
1°) identifying short term quantitative and qualitative shortages of Human Resources needed for providing satisfying classical ATS
2°) develop recommendations for those States that would need to implement a « catch-up programme » in recruitment and training by 2007-2008
3°) determine the evolution of HR needs at the 2020 time horizon, based on current operational practices (baseline scenario)
3°) determine the evolution of HR needs at the 2020 time horizon, based on the widespread introduction of advanced ATM/CNS means and associated new procedures (CNS-ATM scenario)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 11
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSController training
It takes about 2 years to train a controller ab initio (9 months for non-radar initial training + 12 months for radar training), and it takes about 3 months to train a qualified non-radar controller to a radar environment (OJT for re-qualification not included)
The training of qualified controllers to advanced CNS/ATM procedures would take 2 to 3 months (depending whether they are already radar-qualified or not)The assumption is made that all controllers are radar-qualified
The overall cost estimate for the additional training of ACC and TMAcontrollers to ATM/CNS procedures encompasses:
• The training cost of newly recruited controllers, &• The training cost of all the controllers still operational in 2010
Overall training budget for air traffic controllers (PV) is in the order of 10 MUSD
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 12
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSTraining of other staff
The other personnel categories to be considered are:
- Technical support staff:• The technical staff in support of ATS operations consists of engineers and technicians that represent 54 % of the number of controllers (EUROCONTROL PRU data)• Initial training course of 2 weeks on a broad technical overview of CNS-ATM evolutions• The overall training budget for Technical support staff (PV) is in the order of 1.2 MUSD
- Managers:• The number of managers is estimated on the basis of 3 people per ACC or main international airport (typically one head and two deputies)• 2 to 6 weeks programmes of conferences and visits preparing them for the challenges of migrating to CNS-ATM-based services• The overall training budget for Managers (PV) is in the order of 1.9 MUSD
- Pilots:• the number of pilots to be trained to CNS-ATM procedures is derived from the ACAC fleet
structure as determined earlier in this study (only modern aircraft are considered)• 5 pilot-copilot crews (10 pilots) are assumed per long range aircraft and 4 pilot-copilot crews (8 pilots) per short-medium range aircraft• Two courses: starting 2009, en-route GNSS RNAV and APV approaches, then from 2013 ASAS procedures (unit cost equivalent to the one for ATC)• The overall training budget for Pilots (PV) is in the order of 85.3 MUSD
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 13
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSImpact on costs
The global CNS/ATM-specific training costs in the CNS-ATM scenario Are presented in the following table :
Training cost PV (USD)
Costs for ANSP :ATCO 10,0Technical support staff 1,2Managers 1,9Total Costs PV 13,1
Costs for Airlines :Pilots 85,3Total Costs PV 85,3
Total Training Costs PV (USD) 98,4
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 14
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
Overall Study Presentation
Training issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Institutional issues
ACAC Roadmap
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 15
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSCBA Approach
The approach of the CBA study is to define:1°) the starting point for ATM-CNS equipment and human resources (after a minimum catch-up programme completed by 2007-2008)Catch-up programme: list of urgent CNS improvements in 4 countries(Libya, Sudan, Syria, Yemen) based on the state of their infrastructure towards the end of 2003
2°) a « business as usual » baseline scenario consisting only in replacing and expanding classical infrastructure as required by traffic growth without changing the way the services are provided
3°) a CNS-ATM transition scenario consisting in progressively replacing the classical infrastructure and services by CNS-ATM solutions
4°) the additional costs and the benefits yielded by a CNS-ATM scenario when compared with the « business as usual » baseline scenario
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 16
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSScope of the CBA
Current ACAC Airspace StructureProposed ACAC Airspace Structure
In the CNS-ATM scenario
Upper Airspace Upper Airspace
Lower Airspace Lower Airspace
The CBA will only deal with the upper airspace and the main TMA (area coloured in orange in the scheme), as regards ATC staff dimensioning and benefits calculation (economically, the rest of the airspace is negligible)
Main TMA Main TMA Main TMA
Main TMA
SmallTMA
SmallTMA
Airspace
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 17
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSWP4: CBA Results (Global point of view)
The CNS-ATM scenario entails additional costs in terms of aircraft equipment and ANSPcost (GNSS costs, ATCO and support staff training), which are more than compensated by savings in classical infrastructure and operational benefits related to en route and TMAnavigation and the reduction of future airspace congestion delays in some areas.
GNSSCosts<125
MUSD
A/C Eq.Costs
<280 MUSD ANSPCNS Eq.Savings
>105 MUSD
En routeBenefits
>385 MUSD
TMA Opsbenefits
>30 MUSD
ATFMDelay reduc.>165 MUSD
ANS HRCosts< 13
MUSD
ANSP costs and savings to be covered by route chargesFigures represent Present Values over the period 2005-2020
Airlines costs and benefits
+ 191 MUSD
504 USD
696 M USDA/L HRCosts< 86
MUSD
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 18
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
WP4: CBA Results (ANSPs point of view) (2/2)From the ANSP point of view,The objective is to balance costsby charges :
GNSSCosts
125.3 MUSD
AdditionalHR training
Costs13.1 MUSD
Figures represent Present Values over the period 2005-2020
+ 0 M USD
Additional expensesAdditional expenses Savings and additional revenuesSavings and additional revenues
AdditionalCharges:? MUSD
Additional charges : 32.1 M USDGlobal increase in route charges estimated at 0.7 %
ANSPCNS Eq.Savings
106.3 MUSD
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 19
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSWP4: CBA Results (ACAC airlines viewpoint) (2/2)
From the airlines point of view, restricted to ACAC-based companies:If we consider that the ACAC airlines represents only 50% of the total traffic (i. e. they pay only50% of the ANSP costs, but get only 50% of the operational benefits) and fly about 30% of the timein the ACAC area (thus having to amortize there about 30% of their aircraft equipment and training cost) the figures for ACAC airlines alone are significantly positive:
ACACShare of
A/C eq. costamortization<85 MUSD
ACAC fleetOperational
Benefits >311 MUSD
Additionalcharges
< 20 MUSD
> 180 M USD
ACACA/L HRCosts< 26
MUSD
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 20
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
Overall Study Presentation
Training issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Institutional issues
ACAC Roadmap
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 21
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (1/8)
Subregional Civil Aviation entities may play a combination of three different roles on behalf of their Member States:
Functional role EUROCONTROL EASA ASECNA COCESNA ACAC
Coordination YES YES YES limited limited
Operational YES (*) NO YES YES NO
Regulatory YES (**) YES NO NO NO
(*) global for ATFM (CFMU is agency-operated) and AIM (EAD is privately operated), and through additional protocols between groups of states for MUACC and CEATS
(**) enhanced role owing to mandates from the Single European Sky Committee to develop Implementing Rules and Community Specifications
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 22
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (2/8)
ACACGeneral Assembly(all Member States)
Executive Council(5 Member States
for 2 years)
General Directorate(2 renewable years)
Air TransportCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Air SafetyCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Air NavigationCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Arab League(all Member States)
Politicalauthority
and financialsupervision
Adoption of the Work ProgrammeAdoption of DG and EC ReportsAdministrative & Financial Rules
Day-to-day managementand implementation of
General Assembly decisions
election
election
Specialised Committees
election
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 23
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (3/8)
ACACGeneral Assembly(all Member States)
Executive Council(5 Member States
for 2 years)
General Directorate(2 renewable years,a 4 year mandate isUnder discussion)
Air TransportCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Air SafetyCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Air NavigationCommittee
(7 experts for 2 years)
Arab League(all Member States)
Approval ofnew financialInstruments
(if any)
Adoption of the Work ProgrammeAdoption of DG and EC ReportsAdministrative & Financial Rules
Day-to-day managementand implementation of
General Assembly decisions
election
election
Specialised Committees
New mandate(s)
Preliminary analysis: as of today, ACAC has no mandate as an operational Agency enabled to acton behalf of its Member States to provide services or negotiate service provision by third partiesNew mandates for the Air Navigation Committee can be approved by the Executive Council then theGeneral Assembly.For any activities requiring new financial instruments, approval by the Arab League CoordinationCommittee is necessary (followed by submission to the Social and Economic Council)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 24
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (4/8)
Based on the findings of our study, potential areas of intervention for ACAC are:
•The harmonisation of the Upper Airspace (and of FUA policies)
•The creation, in the medium-long term, of some operational entities • a CRCO-like entity for collecting route charges, • a CFMU-like entity in the MID area, • an EAD-like entity for AIS collection and distribution
but no common Area Control Centre
• The joint representation of ACAC States for negotiating service level agreements with external GNSS and SatCom operators
• the development and monitoring of CNS-ATM plans in coordination with adjacent infra-regional entities (such as ASECNA, EAC etc.)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 25
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (5/8)
A first step is to strengthen as needed the institutional statute of ACACso as to allow its Air Navigation Commission to take up a new role as CNS/ATM co-ordinator for the whole area
A second step is to develop new institutional arrangements enablingACAC to receive mandates from its members for undertaking variousactivities on their behalf
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 26
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (6/8)
Three key limitations of existing ACAC arrangements are:
- its lack of financial autonomy- the absence of a comprehensive representation mandate- the absence of any regulatory role for supporting the enforcement of ICAO standards amongst member states
The most ambitious scenario for ACAC is to create a new agency for co-ordinating efforts and external negotiations, in all of the ATM domains, but stopping short of providing operational ATC services on behalf of its states (ie a Eurocontrol-like entity without Maastricht and CEATS, but possibly with its own CFMU set-up for the MID area, and possibly other common service entities)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 27
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (7/8)
This can be implemented gradually:
•First, some exploratory mandates can be given to the Air Navigation Committee or to the General Directorate
•Then a group of States can request some ACAC support for them to create a joint undertaking in a given area or undertake negociations in a specific area
•Finally, an ACAC-derived Agency can be set-up to take responsibility for
certain services on behalf of the participating Member States
In certain fields of activity (especially AIM and ATFM) this third step could provide a clear operational added value to the actions of individual States
For the sake of transition management the « old » ACAC structure should continue to exist after the new Agency is created (like the JAA after the creation of EASA)
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 28
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSInstitutional issues (8/8)
With respect to the various areas already identified, our initial recommendations are:
• Upper Airspace Harmonisation: mandate ACAC ANC to assist Member States in defining an airspace structure based on a specific sectorisation for the Upper Airspace, an FUA policy and optimised interfaces with the main TMAs (the responsibility for implementation shall remain with the States)• ATFM: mandate ACAC ANC to draft a medium term plan for establishing a MID ATFM Unit to be staffed and funded by MID States (it is foreseen that for some other countries like Morocco, ATFM is principally a matter of co-ordination with the CFMU)• AIS: mandate ACAC ANC to draft a plan for a joint Aeronautical Information entity in charge of gathering and distributing AIP on behalf of the participating States (this is one of the first areas where ACAC-wide Service Provision mechanisms could be put in place)• GNSS: mandate ACAC ANC to co-ordinate service level negotiations between Member States and GNSS Service Providers (FAA, GJU etc.) and provide a common framework for conducting safety analyses• Route Charges: mandate ACAC General Directorate to analyse and compare the charge collection mechanisms currently in application (CRCO, IATA, National) and draft a plan to establish a single common mechanism for ATM cost recovery, including the possibility of allocating a fraction of the fund collected to a transnational Agency
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 29
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
Overall Study Presentation
Training issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Institutional issues
ACAC Roadmap
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 30
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSRoadmap for new services and advanced CNS/ATM technologies
Services and Technologies proposed
Service/Technology
Corresponding Global Trend
Requirements 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Deployment of a VSAT network
Training for ATCOs
Agreements between adjacent ACCs on a radar coverage redundancy
Silent transfers inter-ACC
Determination of areas where terrestrial ADS-B is unfeasible or not cost-effective
Migration from Inmarsat-3 towards Inmarsat-4
FIS-B capable aircraft
ADS-B capable aircraft
Training for pilots
FIS-B applicationsAir-ground ADS-B applications
FDM capable aircraft
D-FIS capable aircraft
Migration from Inmarsat-3 towards Inmarsat-4
Training for ATCOs
Training for pilots
FDM applications in Saudi Arabia, Emirates and BahreinFDM applications in Egypt
KEY MILESTONES DCL applications in main airportsD-FIS applications
CPDLC systems for oceanic traffic from/to AsiaCPDLC systems for overflight traffic in the Sahara region
SatCom/VDL-M2
Satellite-based & VDL-based
communications
G-C2
A-S1
A-C1, A-C2
Mobile air-ground point-to-point communicationsfor CPDLC, D-FIS, FDM, DCL, D-ATIS
Modern ground-ground communications for the exchange of AIS and FIS, coordination inter-ACC, distribution of radar surveillance information
Mobile broadcast communicationsfor FIS-B, ADS-B
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 31
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPlanning for infrastructure deployment/decommissioning
<05 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >20
Ground equipment
Global trend Infrastructure Proposed Evolution Particular Comments Mediterranean RIMSahara desert
COMMUNICATION MID area
not useda few kept as back-upa few kept as back-up
increase : already planned & catch-up program increase : already planned & catch-up program increase : catch-up program
increase : catch-up program
G-C1
G-C2
Generalization of VSAT links except in countries with good ground fixed Com
services
Use of one way mobile SatCom for
provision of AIS
VSAT links
VSAT station
HF
VHF
Leased Linescompleted by VSAT links for data or voice based ground communications, AMHS and SatCom
Replacement by Digital Com (SatCom or VDL-M2)
Aeronautical Informations broadcast by datalink instead of VHF (SatCom or VDL-M2)
Used to cope with increasing needs in communications and data sharing
Used for Int'l links, to replace AFTN links & for radar info sharing
-10%+55%
-10%
-25%
+20% -30%
+30%-15%
+5% -25%
22 new stations
16 new stations
39 new stations
-40% -40%-70%
30 new VSAT links
20 new VSAT links
65 new VSAT links
<05 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >20
Aircraft equipment
Global trend Infrastructure Global evolution Comments Forward fitRetrofit
COMMUNICATION
A-C1
A-C2
Use of Digital Com
Modernisation of Communications means
For the deployment of ADS-C, CPDLC & D-FIS applications
VDL-M2 technology
SatCom technology Replace the deployment of VDL technology
100% equipped
100% equipped
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 32
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Thank you for your attention
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 33
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSPresentation at ACAC Seminar 2005
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 34
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
CBA Sensitivity Analysis
The upper bar, in the figure below, illustrates the results for the sensitivity analysis on the different assumptions presented (deployment on the ground, aircraft equipment, assumptions for benefits calculation).
The second bar illustrates the sensitivity analysis on the Time Discount Rate (TDR).
141.0 MUSD{TDR=10%}
136.8 MUSD{Low assumptions}
264.2 MUSD{TDR=5%}
713.7 MUSD{High assumptions}
0,0 100,0 200,0 300,0 400,0 500,0 600,0 700,0 800,0
184.7 MUSD{Nominal assumptions & TDR=8%}
Sensitivity analysis on deployment scenarios and assumptions for benefits
calculation
Sensitivity analysis on the TDR
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 35
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
CBA Sensitivity analysis (Airlines viewpoint)
The figure below illustrates the results for 2 sensitivity analysis from the Airlines point of view. The sensitivity analysis were conducted on :
- Different charging rate by the ANSPs; and
- Different depreciation rate for the Airlines
152.8 MUSD{Charges : 45%}
147.2 MUSD{Depreciation : 35%}
211.1 MUSD{Charges : 55%}
183.8 MUSD{Depreciation : 25%}
0,0 50,0 100,0 150,0 200,0 250,0
181.9 MUSD{Charges : 50% & Depreciation : 30%}
Sensitivity analysis on the
Depreciation Rate
Sensitivity analysis on the
Charging Rate
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 36
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSStaffing level required for Upper Airspace Sectors
Assumptions :
• The number of sectors foreseen in 2010 and 2020 (as defined In Phase 1) have been used to determine recruitment and training needs for every country
• 1 H24 sector requires up to 15 controllers in the staff (11 operational + 3 for training and studies and 1 for management activities)
in 2005 in 2010 in 2020
Algeria 2 2 3Bahrain 2 3 3Egypt 2 3 3
Emirates 2 2 3Iraq - - -
Jordan 1 1 1Kuweit - - -
Lebanon 1 1 1Libya 2 2 2
Morocco 2 2 3Oman 2 2 2
Pal.Gaza - - -Qatar - - -
Saudi Arabia 5 6 6Sudan 2 3 3Syria 1 2 2
Tunisia 1 1 2
Yemen 1 1 1
TOTAL 26 31 35
Number of Upper Airspace sectors
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 37
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Source column : ‘E’ = from ENAC ; ‘S’ = (Sof) based on data from General questionnaire; ‘Q’ = from detailed HR questionnaire
The yearly recruitment needs takes into account staff renewal due to career evolutions.
Staffing level required for Upper Airspace sectors
in 2005 in 2010 in 2020 2005 and 2010 2010 and 2020
Algeria E 85 2 2 3 - 6 45 5Bahrain S 41 2 3 3 11 11 17 6Egypt Q 85 2 3 3 - - 23 -
Emirates Q 42 2 2 3 - 12 8 2Iraq - -
Jordan Q 34 1 1 1 - - 14 5Kuweit - -
Lebanon S 12 1 1 1 4 4 5 1Libya S 85 2 2 2 - - 34 12
Morocco S 85 2 2 3 - - 34 12Oman Q 45 2 2 2 - - 9 -
Pal.Gaza - -Qatar - -
Saudi Arabia Q 60 5 6 6 32 22 22 -Sudan S - 2 3 3 46 - - -Syria S 35 1 2 2 1 9 14 5
Tunisia Q 57 1 1 2 - 3 30 9Yemen S 27 1 1 1 - - 11 4
TOTAL 693 26 31 35 93 67 266 61
So
urc
e
Current ACC staff
Retirement over the period
Staff not to be trained
(>55 in 2005)
Total recruitment between …Number of Upper Airspace sectors
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 38
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Staffing level required for Main TMA sectors
in 2005 in 2010 in 2020
> 10,000 18 16 8 15
> 30,000 12 11 15 20
> 80,000 3 6 9 26
> 180,000 1 2 3 33
TOTAL 34 35 35
Number of Major airportsMovements
per year
Nb of controllers per airport
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 39
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Source column : ‘E’ = from ENAC ; ‘S’ = (Sof) based on data from General questionnaire; ‘Q’ = from detailed HR questionnaire‘ ‘ = assumption is made that current staff is sufficient for today’s traffic
The yearly recruitment needs takes into account staff renewal due to career evolutions.
Staffing level required for Main TMA sectors
in 2005 in 2010 in 2020 2005 and 2010 2010 and 2020
Algeria 45 3 3 5 - 19 18 6Bahrain S 36 2 3 3 - 5 15 5Egypt Q 19 9 10 12 102 12 2 -
Emirates Q 114 8 10 10 - 6 26 3Iraq -
Jordan Q 18 2 3 3 17 6 6 -Kuweit 30 2 3 3 - 8 12 4
Lebanon S 8 2 2 2 13 2 3 1Libya S 100 1 1 1 - - 40 14
Morocco S 212 4 5 7 - - 86 30Oman Q 15 2 2 3 5 6 - -
Pal.Gaza -Qatar 30 2 3 3 - 8 12 4
Saudi Arabia Q 104 13 13 15 26 33 22 1Sudan S 12 1 1 2 4 9 5 1Syria S - 1 1 1 - - - -
Tunisia Q 61 4 5 7 1 32 28 7Yemen S - 1 1 2 15 5 - -
TOTAL 804 57 66 79 183 149 273 76
So
urc
eCurrent
APP staffRetirement
over the period
Staff not to be trained
(>55 in 2005)
Number of TMA sectors Total recruitment between …
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 40
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSGround infrastructure deployment - COM infrastructure deployment
HF deployment/decommissioning
0
10
20
30
40
50
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
VSAT stations & links deployment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
VSAT station Baseline
VSAT link Baseline
VSAT station CNS/ATM
VSAT link CNS/ATM
Leased lines deployment/decommissioning
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
VHF deployment/decommissioning
0
40
80
120
160
200
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 41
ACAC Study of ATM-CNSGround infrastructure deployment –
Conventional NAV and SUR infrastructure deploymentADS-B deployment/decommissioning
0
10
20
30
40
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
VOR, DME deployment/decommissioning
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
PSR/SSR deployment/decommissioning
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 42
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Ground infrastructure deployment - NAV infrastructure deploymentAPV-SBAS deployment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
ILS deployment/decommissioning
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
GBAS deployment/decommissioning
0
10
20
30
40
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Baseline
CNS/ATM
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 43
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Aircraft equipment deployment - Baseline Scenario
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
GPS
SBAS
GBAS Cat I
GBAS CatII/III
Galileo
VDLtechnology
SatComtechnology
ADS-Breceiver
ACAC Study 16 September 2005 44
ACAC Study of ATM-CNS
Aircraft equipment deployment - CNS-ATM Scenario
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
GPS
SBAS
GBAS Cat I
GBAS CatII/III
Galileo
VDLtechnology
SatComtechnology
ADS-Breceiver